throbber
Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 1 of 100 Page ID #:1
`
`Robert G. Klein, Esq., State Bar No. 128550
`LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT G. KLEIN
`8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 935
`Beverly Hills, California 90211
`
`Telephone: (833) 997-5529
`Email: robert@kleinlitigation.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Genesis Media LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`GENESIS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada Limited ) CASE NO.
`Liability Company
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`!
`
`COMPLAINT FOR:
`
`vs.
`
`) 1. Violation of 18 U.S.C.§1962(d) by
`)
`Conspiring to Violate §1962(a)
`OWNZONES MEDIA NETWORK, INC, a )
`corporation; DAN GOMAN, an individual; )
`JOSEPH GOMAN, an individual; MARY
`LAU, an individual; JUDY KIM, an
`individual; MITCH BERMAN, an
`individual; JOIW CALKINS, an
`individual; CRAIG KORNBLAU, an
`individual and DOES 1 through 50
`inclusive.
`
`2. Violation of 18 U.S.C. §1962(d) by
`Conspiring to Violate §1962(c)
`
`) 3. Violation of 18 U.S.C.§1962(c)
`)
`
` 4. Breach of Implied Contract
`Restitution-Unjust Enrichment
`
`))
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Plaintiff Genesis Media LLC, as and for its complaint against Ownzones Media
`
`Network, Inc, a corporation; Dan Goman, an individual; Joseph Goman, an individual; Mary
`
`Lau, an individual; Judy Kim, an individual; Mitch Berman, an individual; John Calkins, an
`
`individual, and Craig Komblau, an individual alleges as follows:
`
`Nature of Action
`
`1.
`
`This is an action arising out of defendants’ violations of the Racketeer
`
`Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.§§1961-1968. This case emanates from
`1
`
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`6 7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`zt
`
`il
`
`c5 ^ i
`H S 11
`^ S § -
`ca d t
`O > -j n
`QC 03 U
`. . «. m
`2
` 2O
`O X
`V) X
`til
`3
` S
`b. S u
`ts. " >
`O
`O 00 U3
`
`2 C
`
`XS
`
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 2 of 100 Page ID #:2
`
`the defendants systematic pattern to defraud plaintiff out of the money plaintiff placed with
`
`defendants as part of a business proposition. The defendants racketeering activities included
`
`criminal violations of the wire fraud and mail fraud statutes, and included security law
`
`violations found at Sections 20 and 22 of the Securities Act of 1933 and various sections of
`
`15 U.S.C. §§ 21 and 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The defendants scheme and
`
`pattern of racketeering starts with Ownzones making false and fraudulent oral and written
`
`representations inflating revenue projections to induce parties to enter into contracts with
`
`Ownzones. In this case Ownzones provided Genesis Media inflated revenue projections to
`
`induce Genesis Media into investing $3.1 million with Ownzones. As part of the pattern of
`
`racketeering Ownzones provided inflated returns on stock offerings Ownzones made to
`
`prospective investors. The Securities and Exchange Commission sued Ownzones, Dan Goman
`
`and Joseph Goman for fraud in connection with the sale of securities in violation of federal
`
`securities laws. Ownzones continued its pattern of racketeering by submitting over-inflated
`
`expense summaries, and embezzling money from Genesis Media by sending fraudulent bank
`
`wire transfers to Ownzones’ branch office in Romania.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in excess of $14 million, plus treble
`
`damages under the RICO claims, along with interest, attorney fees, and cost of suit. Plaintiff
`
`thus seeks recovery of damages from defendants in excess of $56 million.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Parties
`
`Genesis Media LLC is a Nevada limited liability company created by Howard
`
`I.
`
`3.
`
`Misle. Genesis Media was formed in March 2017 in anticipation of entering into a joint
`
`venture partnership with Ownzones Media. Genesis Media raised slightly over $6 million to
`
`be used exclusively to fund a budget to create the 420Tv app.
`n.
`Defendants
`4.
`
`Ownzones Media Networks, Inc. is an entertainment technology company that
`
`claims to provide a technology that allows content providers to make their content available
`
`in a standardized format to various digital platforms. Ownzones Media Network is a Nevada
`
`0
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`zu-
`
`2
`
`O'
`
`M
`
`r- W CO —
`
`O ^ iUJ < s
`^ 5 z ^
`^ a; cn
`U ●- O '£>
`Cfl c =
`O >
`QC
`^ r.
`o
`O
`0.> ^
`>o
`<
`
`iT.
`
`r-y
`^ 0©
`
`is.
`
`H
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 3 of 100 Page ID #:3
`
`corporation with its principal office in Beverly Hills, California.
`
`5.
`
`Ownzones founder and CEO is Dan Goman who is a resident of Los Angeles,
`
`California. He is the founder, sole board member, president, chief executive officer, and
`
`largest shareholder of Ownzones Media Network, Inc.
`
`6.
`
`Joseph Goman, age 31, is a resident of Phoenix, Arizona. He is Dan Goman’s
`
`younger brother and was, until May 2018, a paid consultant for OwnZones who presented to
`
`current and prospective investors and also performed business development and sales
`
`functions. At all times relevant Joseph Goman worked out of Ownzones’ Beverly Hills office.
`
`7.
`
`Mary Lau is a citizen of Los Angeles, California. At all times she was an
`
`employee and financial consultant of Ownzones Media Network. Mary Lau prepared financial
`
`projections for Ownzones.
`
`8.
`
`Judy Kim is Ownzones Media’s in-house counsel. Judy Kim is actively involved
`
`in all aspects of Ownzones Media’s business including, but not limited to is financial dealings,
`
`securities offerings, securities transactions and legal compliance with the securities and
`
`corporate laws.
`9.
`
`Mitch Berman at all times was a high level consultant and advisor to Ownzones
`
`Media and a shareholder in Ownzones Media Network, Inc.. Mitch Berman was actively
`
`involved in Ownzones’ efforts to raise money and procure financing. Mitch Berman
`
`intentionally concealed from AlexNahai and Howard Misle the fact that Ownzones was under
`
`investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission for securities fraud during the time
`
`Ownzones Media was negotiating the contract with Genesis Media. Mitch Berman is a citizen
`
`of Los Angeles, California.
`10.
`
`John Calkins is both a high level consultant, employee, and advisor to Ownzones
`
`Media as well as a shareholder in the company. John Calkins’ role at Ownzones included
`
`advising Ownzones on financial matters including procuring financing from investors though
`
`stock offerings. John Calkins is a citizen of Los Angeles, California.
`11.
`
`Craig Kornblau at all times was an employee of Ownzones Media working from
`
`its Beverly Hills office. Craig Kornblau has been a strategic advisor to Ownzones since
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`3
`
`z -
`
`]
`
`l o
`u ^ ®
`< 8
`UJ
`H H
`— O'
`5 5 z ^
`|"■£S
`Co c ± ^
`O ^ < S
`A/
`m U
`LU
`zo
`O
`-1
`u
`VI X £
`U 5 i “
`t s S
`H
`>o" ^
`Urn
`CO
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 4 of 100 Page ID #:4
`
`December 2017, was involved in fund raising, investor relations, and bringing investors to
`
`Ownzones. Since February 2017 Craig Kornblau has been an advisor to Google Ventures and
`
`an advisor for Row8 since April 2016 a company owned by John Calkins.
`
`12.
`
`Each named defendant either played an active role in the securities fraud or were
`
`part of a conspiracy to engage in the securities fraud violations and/or RICO violations.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`13.
`
`The court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 18
`
`U.S.C. §1961 et. seq., 28 U.S.C. §1331,28 U.S.C. §1337 and 28 U.S.C. §1367.
`
`14.
`
`Personal jurisdiction and venue in this District are proper pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
`
`§1965 and 28 U.S.C. §1391(b) because: (I) defendants are found in, have agents in, and/or
`
`transact business and affairs in, this District, and have minimum contacts with this District;
`
`and (ii) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims for relief occurred
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`in this District.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`Relevant Time Period
`
`15.
`
`Defendants’ racketeering conduct began in or about 2011 and continued until
`
`at least when Ownzones Media was served with the SEC Complaint on April 2, 2020.
`
`General Allegations
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff Genesis Media LLC is a Nevada limited liability company that was
`
`formed in March 2017 for the sole purpose of entering into a joint venture partnership with
`
`Ownzones Media Networks, Inc.
`
`17.
`
`Effective May 22, 2017 the parties entered into the joint venture partnership
`
`agreement called the Strategic Alliance Agreement. A copy of that agreement is attached as
`
`23
`
`Exhibit 1.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`18.
`
`Before the parties signed the Strategic Alliance Agreement the parties always
`
`referred to the money Genesis Media contributed to develop the app as the "budget” and part
`
`of a joint venture partnership.
`
`19.
`
`About a week before the parties signed the Strategic Alliance Agreement,
`
`Ownzones insisted the term "budgef’was replaced by the term "service agreement”.
`
`4
`
`z
`
`rj
`
` SO
`
`v
`
`l oo ^ ^
`O'<u
`a: 5 2
`
`C£.
`n o 2
`cfl Q t
`-j r?
`
`O X d g
`
`mm
`
`tl)
`
`la
`
`U 5 i “
`U. r. >uo
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 5 of 100 Page ID #:5
`
`20.
`
`Genesis Media later learned that Ownzones Media wanted the Strategic Alliance
`
`Agreement to claim it was a “service fee” and not a “budget” so Ownzones Media could
`
`falsely represent to its potential investors that Ownzones had $40 million asset on its balance
`
`sheet ($4.1 million per year for ten years).
`
`21.
`
`In reality the money Genesis Media paid to develop the app did not belong to
`
`Ownzones but instead was to be used exclusively to develop the app. As part of its scheme
`
`and pattern of racketeering Ownzones was falsely inflating its balance sheet to attract
`
`unsuspecting investors.
`
`22.
`
`The joint venture was to develop an “app” called 420Tv using streaming digital
`
`technology to create a “channel” marketed to people interested in, or curious about, the
`
`cannabis lifestyle.
`
`23.
`
`Under the Strategic Alliance Agreement Genesis Media, Ownzones Media, and
`
`Alex Nahai Consulting would co-own, co-manage, and share profits on the 420Tv project.
`
`24.
`
`The agreement required Genesis to fund the budget for the 420Tv app to: (a) to
`
`create and/or hire third party content producers to create television shows and a weekly news
`
`program on the cannabis industry; (b) licence movies from copyright holders that would pique
`
`the interest of people curious about the cannabis lifestyle; (c) budget for technology needed
`
`to operate the website and channel; and (d) pay for marketing and public relations. The last
`
`page of the Strategic Alliance Agreement sets out the only allowable budget items
`
`25.
`
`The parties anticipated the first year budget would be $4.1 million however
`
`Ownzones only spent about $1.4 million on the 420Tv app in the first year. The parties
`
`anticipated that Genesis would need to fund about $600k in the second year after generating
`
`about $800k in anticipated ad sales. Ownzones projected the 420Tv app would generate
`
`between $ 10-$ 12.5 million in the third year. By Ownzones’ projections. Genesis Media would
`
`have recouped its total investment and the 420Tv app would be self-sustaining with sufficient
`
`yearly revenues to perpetuate the business without any additional infusion of funds needed
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`from Genesis Media.
`
`28
`
`26.
`
`Ownzones represented it could get one million visitors to the 420Tv app and
`
`5
`
`z -
`
`]
`
`<N
`
`6^5
`< o
`H b $
`Ov
`Z
`^ P
`c/^
`
`CH D =
`O > !^ S
`ci s ^ 2-
`rv “ ^ 7
`o X
`^ “ d O
`a
`1/5
`Q.
`u>-
`H
`
`fc i >UJ
`o
`UJ
`a
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 6 of 100 Page ID #:6
`
`website by the third year and Ownzones projected the 420Tv app would generate profits of
`
`$10-12.5 million in the third year. The revenue was to come from: (a) monthly subscriptions;
`
`(b) advertising revenue; and (c) merchandise sale. The business model was fashioned after
`
`other streaming channels like Netflix and Amazon Prime.
`
`27.
`
`During the period from March 2017 through May 22, 2017, in order to entice
`
`Genesis Media LLC to enter into the joint venture partnership agreement, Dan Goman of
`
`Ownzones represented to Howard Misle that, among other things, Ownzones was a highly
`
`successful company engaged in producing and creating high quality television channels using
`
`streaming digital technology,
`
`28.
`
`Dan Goman bragged about the big name and wealthy clients Ownzones landed
`
`and how Ownzones possessed decades of experience at companies such as Amazon, HBO,
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`Netflix and Microsoft.
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29.
`
`Goman repeatedly told Misle that Ownzones was in the process of obtaining
`
`investments of $60 million from large corporations like Magnolia Pictures, MGM, Google
`
`Ventures, and Sinclair Broadcasting.
`
`30.
`
`Goman repeatedly assured Misle that Ownzones had a stellar reputation in the
`
`industry and was financially sound.
`
`31.
`
`In reliance of these and other representation and financial projections Genesis
`
`Media entered into the joint venture partnership agreement. Dan Goman’s representations
`
`about Ownzones’ standing in the industry including the representation of its experience and
`
`stellar reputation was a substantial factor in Genesis Media deciding to enter into this joint
`
`venture partnership agreement.
`
`32.
`
`What Dan Goman did not say was that at the time Ownzones and Genesis were
`
`negotiating their contract, Ownzones was struggling financially. In fact, it was recently
`
`revealed in the SEC Complaint infra that “the company [Ownzones] had never been
`
`profitable”.
`33.
`
`On April 14, 2018 about 11 months after the parties signed the joint venture
`
`partnership agreement, Dan Goman sent Howard Misle an email stating:
`
`6
`
`z .
`
`J
`
`l o
`
`O'
`
`r“.
`
`< O
`u. H
`2
`22 =)
`v:l- o
`ffl Cl t
`O > ■:?
`Ci m U.* LU
`u. s
`zo
`O X
`&
`UJ
`^ §
`fr.u, S >
`o “ “ca
`
`(A
`
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 7 of 100 Page ID #:7
`
`As I think you're already aware, in the last 12 months or so,
`OWNZONES as a company has been increasingly moving in
`the direction of being a technology company only....
`To that end, I am proposing the following: We would keep doing
`the technology piece - nothing would change there
`The change would be in terms of content production, marketing
`and distribution.”. [Exhibit 2]
`
`34.
`
`At the time the parties were negotiating the j oint venture partnership agreement
`
`that was signed May 22,2017, Ownzones was already contemplating discontinuing the content
`
`production arm of its company.
`
`35.
`
`Eleven months after signing the joint venture partnership agreement, Ownzones
`
`repudiated 97% of the entire contract.
`
`36.
`
`Genesis later learned that the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a
`
`complaint (“SEC Complaint”) against Ownzones Media Network, Inc., Dan Goman, and
`
`Joseph Goman on April 2, 2020 for violation of Sections 20 and 22 of the Securities Act of
`
`1933 and various sections of 15 U.S.C. §§ 21 and 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
`
`37.
`
`Genesis Media also learned that the Securities and Exchange Commission had
`
`been investigating Ownzones for security fraud violations as far back as March 2017 during
`
`the time Ownzones and Genesis Media were negotiating their contract. Dan Goman and
`
`Ownzones’ consultant defendant Mitch Berman concealed that fact from Howard Misle and
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`Alex Nahai.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`38.
`
`According to the SEC Complaint Ownzones Media raised roughly $45 million
`
`of illicit funds from the sale of unregistered securities through a fraudulent scheme to avoid
`
`detection on the number of purchasers. Ownzones and its principals also used fraudulent
`
`representations in their offer and sale of securities in violation of the federal securities laws.
`
`A copy of that complaint m Securities & Exchange Commission vs. Ownzones Media Network,
`
`Inc., Dan Goman and Joseph Goman United States District Court number 2:20-cv-03108 is
`
`attached as Exhibit 3.
`
`39.
`
`On January 12, 2021 a Final Judgment was entered against Ownzones Media
`
`Network, Inc. A copy of that final Judgment is attached as Exhibit 4.
`
`40.
`
`On January 13,2021 a Final Judgment was entered against Dan Goman. A copy
`
`7
`
`z
`
`< O
`
`l o fN
`O - S o
`UJ
`h- I-
`-5 5 z
`W
` o s
`CO d -
`S ^ < '
`-j
`u. s 2
`o
`O I
`a.
`U]
`>- “
`U 5 j -J
`u
`>
`U.
`C - u.
`
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 8 of 100 Page ID #:8
`
`of that final judgment is attached as Exhibit 5. Page 5 of that judgment states “the allegations
`
`in the complaint were true and admitted by Defendant [Dan Goman]”. This was to avoid the
`
`possibility that Dan Goman would discharge this judgment in bankruptcy; however this
`
`statement is a declaration against interest made by Dan Goman.
`
`41.
`
`On March 17, 2021 a Final Judgment was entered against Joseph Goman. A
`
`copy of that final judgment is attached as Exhibit 6.
`
`42.
`
`The Joseph Goman judgment states“the allegations in the complaint were true
`
`and admitted by Defendant [Joseph Goman]”.
`
`43.
`
`After Howard Misle learned about the SEC Complaint and eventual judgments
`
`things started making more sense.
`
`44.
`
`The Strategic Alliance Agreement required Genesis to fund a $4.1 million
`
`budget to develop the 420Tv app.
`
`45.
`
`Genesis funded $3.1 million of the budget by July 2017, about 45 days after
`
`signing the contract which by the contract’s term was timely. The parties agreed that Genesis
`
`could defer funding the last $1 million until Misle saw how the project was progressing.
`
`46.
`
`By February 2018, some 217 days later, Dan Goman sent an email to Alex Nahai
`
`asking when Howard Misle was coming up with the last $1 million because he had investors
`
`coming around who would be “asking questions”.
`
`47.
`
`Misle learned that Dan Goman wanted this last $1 million, that was supposed
`
`to go into the 420Tv project, to put on Ownzones’ financial statements to create the false
`
`impression that Ownzones appeared to be stronger financially than its accurate financials
`
`showed. Goman did this in order to defraud these unsuspecting investors.
`
`48.
`
`Had Howard Misle known that Dan Goman of Ownzones was engaging in
`
`securities fraud at the time they were negotiating their contract. Genesis Media would never
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`would have entered into this contract.
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`49.
`
`Had Howard Misle known that Dan Goman of Ownzones was not a financially
`
`viable company and not capable of performing its contractual obligations, Genesis Media
`
`never would have entered into this contract.
`
`za
`
`l oo ^ *UJ < 8O
`
`s
`
`O E
`
`Z
`
`Cu
`LU
`
`U. 2 u3
`
`i-
`
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 9 of 100 Page ID #:9
`
`50.
`
`On February 2,2018 Dan Goman wire transferred $99,000 of Genesis Media’s
`
`money to Ownzones’ branch office in Romania.
`
`51.
`
`On March 5, 2018 Dan Goman wire transferred $37,000 of Genesis Media’s
`
`money to Ownzones’ branch office in Romania.
`
`52.
`
`The budget for the 420Tv project did not allow Ownzones to use any of the $3.1
`
`million it received from Genesis Media for Ownzones’ overhead including employee salaries,
`
`office rent, or attorney fees. The budget attached to the Strategic Alliance Agreement is
`
`specific on the allowed expenditures.
`
`53.
`
`As of March 31, 2018 Ownzones only spent $43,895.34 for the technology
`
`portion of the 4201V budget.
`
`54.
`
`If Ownzones spent $43,895.34 on technology to any party other than Ownzones
`
`then Ownzones embezzled $92,104.66.
`
`55.
`
`If Ownzones spent the entire $43,895.34 on Ownzones’ employees then
`
`Ownzones embezzled $136,000 from Genesis Media. Discovery will be needed.
`
`56.
`
`In April 2018 Ownzones emailed Genesis Media its 420Tv Expense Summary.
`
`On that expense summary Ownzones fraudulently over-inflated an expense item where
`
`Ownzones charged Genesis Media $325,000 for Ownzones’ attorney fees which were not a
`
`budgeted item.
`
`57.
`
`In May 2018 Dan Goman told Howard Misle that Ownzones was incapable of
`
`performing the Strategic Alliance Agreement and was repudiating 97% of the contract.
`
`58.
`
`Misle asked Goman to return the $1.6 million left over from Genesis Media’s
`
`$3.1 million, to turn over access to the 420Tv domain name, app and website, and all contracts
`
`entered into for the project. Dan Goman refused.
`
`59.
`
`Genesis Media gave Ownzones Media $3.1 and has nothing to show for that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25 money.
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`60.
`
`Genesis lost $3.1 million, lost profits, and has been unable to make the 420Tv
`
`app functional in order to be able to generate any revenue.
`
`61.
`
`Genesis Media did not learn that Ownzones Media Network was a criminal
`
`9
`
`zu
`
` o
`
`tu
`
`d ^ in
`ci D 5 2
`u o S
`M d Si -
`O > nnC'l
`CQ U ^
`
`o
`bi
`
`<
`
`Ic
`
`.
`H
`-J d
`h-
`
`Cs.
`fa. “ >
`O - UJa
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 10 of 100 Page ID #:10
`
`enterprise until after the SEC complaint was filed on April 2, 2020 and confirmed by
`
`judgments against Ownzones Media, Dan Goman, and Joseph Goman.
`
`62.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Ownzones’ fraud and deceit Ownzones
`
`repudiated the contract and caused Genesis Media damages in the amount of at least $14
`
`million.
`
`Facts Regarding Defendant's Securities Fraud as Part of Its Racketeering Scheme
`
`63.
`
`From 2011 through the present, OwnZones Media Network, Inc., its CEO and
`
`president Daniel Goman (“Dan Goman”), and its agent and stock salesman Joseph Goman
`
`(“Joe Goman”) raised roughly $45 million offering and selling an unregistered securities
`
`offering to over a thousand investors without any exemption from registration.
`
`64.
`
`The company engaged in general solicitation and raised money from numerous
`
`unaccredited investors, purporting to avoid selling to too many unaccredited investors by
`
`devising a “subinvestmenf'process whereby subinvestors’” money has been aggregated under
`
`supposedly accredited “direct investors.” OwnZones raised money through its unregistered
`
`offering, taking in millions of dollars just before the SEC Complaint was filed.
`
`65.
`
`OwnZones, Dan Goman, and Joe Goman also committed fraud in the course of
`
`offering and selling OwnZones stock. Joe Goman, while selling OwnZones stock on behalf
`
`of the company, made multiple misstatements to investors that ranged from saying that
`
`Venture Capitalist MC and MGM had purchased OwnZones stock for $5 per share to
`
`representing that Google had offered to buy OwnZones for $500 million.
`
`66.
`
`Joe Goman also made baseless predictions that OwnZones was about to go
`
`public and that its IPO price would be many multiples higher than what investors were paying
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`for their shares.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`67.
`
`OwnZones and Dan Goman made additional statements to investors concerning
`
`OwnZones’ IPO and the status of discussions with major company investors that were false
`
`or misleading. Moreover, Dan Goman, who runs the company’s day-to-day operations and has
`
`primary responsibility for handling investments in the company, was liable as a control person
`
`of OwnZones, and he did not act in good faith because he ignored multiple warning signs
`
`10
`
`z
`
`l o
`
`LU
`
`—' O'
`
`t o< o
`s i A
`u c 2
`ca Q
`o > d nn
`C'i
`ffi u
`
`UJ
`
`o S d g
`u ^
`LU
`a: H
`u. ?? >
`o
`<
`
`fr r-.
`
`00 liJ
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 11 of 100 Page ID #:11
`
`about Joe’s misconduct in connection with his OwnZones fundraising efforts.
`
`68.
`
`Defendants’ pattern of racketeering started with Ownzones and Goman’s false
`
`and fraudulent oral and written representations inflating revenue projections made to Genesis
`
`Media and continuing with “[Goman’s] “fraud in the course of offering and selling OwnZones
`
`stock. Joe Goman, while selling OwnZones stock on behalf of the company, made multiple
`
`misstatements to investors” as alleged in the SEC Complaint.
`
`69.
`
`By this conduct, all of the Defendants violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of
`
`the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule lOb-5 thereunder. In
`
`addition, Dan Goman is liable under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act for OwnZones’
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`violations of that Act.
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`70.
`
`Ownzones and Dan Goman also engaged in wire fraud by embezzling over
`
`$136,000 from Genesis Media by wiring Genesis Media’s money to Ownzones branch office
`
`in Romania. Dan Goman wired a fraudulent payment on February 2,2018 and March 5,2018.
`
`71.
`
`The other defendants aided, abetted and assisted Dan Goman and Joseph Goman
`
`and were part of a conspiracy to defraud and violate the RICO statute.
`
`72.
`
`Genesis Media brings this action for damages under 18 U.S.C. §1961(a), (c)and
`
`(d); the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), and the common law.
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`(Violation of 18 U.S.C. §1962(d) by Conspiring to Violate §1962(a)
`
`Against Each Defendant)
`
`73.
`
`Genesis Media realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained
`
`in the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`74.
`
`Plaintiff is a “person’* under 18 U.S.C. §1961(3) and 1964(c).
`
`75.
`
`1962(d).
`76.
`
`Each of the defendants is a “person” under 18 U.S.C. §1961(3). 1962(a), and
`
`Ownzones Media Network, Inc. and the individual defendants constitute an
`
`a
`
`enterprise” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.§1961(4) and §1962(a) which were engaged in
`
`activities affecting intestate commerce at all times relevant to this Complaint.
`
`z (
`
`a)
`
`» o
`O o
`O'< 8●>
`; o
`u. ^
`r Q2 ^ < <N
`o
`a.> ^
`y 5
`u
`“ H
`b 30b
` >
`O " “£3
`
`zO
`
`ui
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 12 of 100 Page ID #:12
`
`77.
`
`Defendants conspired among themselves within the meaning of 18
`
`U.S.C.§ 1962(d) to violate 18 U.S.C.§ 1962(a), that is, defendants conspired among themselves
`
`that income would be received, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of activity unlawful under
`
`18 U.S.C.§1961(1)(A) in which defendants participated as principals within the meaning of
`
`18 U.S.C.§§1961(1). 1961(5), and 1962(a), to wit: multiple repeated, and continuous acts of
`
`fraudulent inducement including securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud.
`
`78.
`
`As a result, plaintiff has suffered substantial injury to his business within the
`
`meaning of 18 U.S.C.§ 1964(c), including but not limited to the loss of $3.1 million that was
`
`converted by the defendants, lost income of $10 million, attorney fees currently about
`
`$500,000, and loss of business opportunity of $500,000.
`
`SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`(Violation of 18 U.S.C, §1962(d) by Conspiring to Violate §1962(c)
`
`Against Each Defendant)
`
`79.
`
`Genesis Media realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained
`
`in the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`80.
`
`81.
`
`1962(d).
`
`Plaintiff is a "person’’ under 18 U.S.C. §1961(3) and 1964(c).
`
`Each of the defendants is a "person” under 18 U.S.C. §1961(3). 1962(a), and
`
`82.
`
`Ownzones Media Network, Inc. and the individual defendants constitute an
`
`“enterprise” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.§1961(4) and 1962(c), which were engaged in
`
`activities affecting interstate commerce at all times relevant to this complaint.
`83.
`Each of the defendants were and are associated with the enterprise and conspired
`
`within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) to violate 18 U.S.C.§ 1962(c), that is, the defendants
`
`conspired to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the management and operations
`
`of the affairs of Ownzones Media Network, Inc in relationship to the Plaintiff through a
`
`pattern of activity unlawful under 18 U.S.C.§§1961. §1341 and §1343, to wit: multiple
`
`repeated, and continuous acts of fraudulent inducement including securities fraud, mail fraud
`and wire fraud.
`
`12
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`zu
`
`d - ®
`< §O'
`S - § §
`ca Q t
`O > d '■
`^ » u c
`z
`u.
`o
`ai J S
`O
` r -i X
`&
`t/5
`tu
`-J
`UJ
`“■ H
`
`u.
`
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 13 of 100 Page ID #:13
`
`84.
`
`As a result, plaintiff has suffered substantial injury to his business within the
`
`meaning of 18 U.S.C.§1964(c), including but not limited to the loss of $3.1 million that was
`
`converted by the defendants, lost income of $10 million, attorney fees currently about
`
`$500,000, and loss of business opportunity of $500,000.
`
`THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`(Violation of 18 U.S.C. §1962(c) Against Each Defendant)
`
`85.
`
`Genesis Media realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained
`
`in the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`86.
`
`87.
`
`1962(d).
`
`Plaintiffis a “person” under 18 U.S.C. §1961(3) and 1964(c).
`
`Each of the defendants is a “person” under 18 U.S.C. §1961(3). 1962(a), and
`
`88.
`
`Ownzones Media Network, Inc. and the individual defendants constitute an
`
`“enterprise” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C.§1961(4) and 1962(c), which were engaged in
`
`activities affecting interstate commerce at all times relevant to this complaint.
`
`89.
`
`Each of the individual defendants were and are associated with the enterprise
`
`and have conducted or participated, directly or indirectly, in the management and operation
`
`of the affairs of the enterprise in relationship to the plaintiff through a pattern of activity
`
`unlawful under 18U.S.C.§1961 (A) to wit: multiple repeated, and continuous acts of fraudulent
`
`inducement including securities fraud, mail fraud and wire fraud.
`
`90.
`
`Plaintiff has suffered substantial injury to its business or property within the
`
`meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) by reason of the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) committed by
`
`the defendants, including but not limited to the loss of $3.1 million that was converted by the
`
`defendants, lost income of $10 million, attorney fees currently about $500,000, and loss of
`
`business opportunity of $500,000.
`
`FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`(Breach of Implied Contract-Restitution-Unjust Enrichment Against Each
`
`91.
`
`Genesis Media realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained
`
`Defendant)
`
`13
`
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`z
`
`r-i
`
`PJ
`
`r'i
`
`< 8
`sU ,
`— Ov
`^ a: ri-.
`: o
`ffl d t
`O > :?
`m u
`LU
`
`z
`Ox _
`u ^
`U 5 ^
`>
`b.
`o “ “ce
`
`oX u
`
`t-
`
`<
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-03128 Document 1 Filed 04/12/21 Page 14 of 100 Page ID #:14
`
`in the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
`
`92.
`
`After Genesis Media and Ownzones Media entered into the Strategic Alliance
`
`Agreement, Ownzones falsely represented to its potential investors and potential partners that
`
`the Genesis-Ownzones contract was a service fee contract where Ownzones would earn $4.1
`
`million per year for ten years.
`
`93.
`
`In truth and fact the contract was a joint venture partnership agreement and the
`
`money Genesis Media was to contribute to develop the 420Tv app did not belong to Ownzones
`
`but was to be used exclusively to create the 420Tv app.
`
`94.
`
`Ownzones made that false representation to inflate its balance sheet and
`
`financial records in order to convince investors to invest in Ownzones’ stock offerings and to
`
`entice corporate giants to contract with Ownzones.
`
`95.
`
`As a direct result of Ownzones conduct Ownzones was unjustly enriched by $45
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`million.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Genesis Media prays for relief and judgment against all defendants
`
`as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Compensatory and consequential damages to plaintiffs business and property,
`
`including but not limited to, $14 million consisting of a loss of $3.1 million that was
`
`converted by the defendants, lost income of $10 million, attorney fees currently about
`
`$500,000, and loss of business opportunity of $500,000;
`
`2.
`
`Threefold the amount of the damages sustained by plaintiffs for defendants
`
`violations of 18 U.S.C.§§1961-1968 in the amount of $42 million for a total of$56 million.
`
`3.
`
`Exemplary and punitive damages for the defendants’ intentional, willful, wanton,
`
`outrageous or malicious misconduct, characterized by their evil or rancorous motive, ill will
`
`and intent to injure the plaintiff or the defendants’ gross negligence evincing a conscious
`
`disregard for plaintiffs rights in an amount to be determined at the time of trial.
`
`4.
`
`Equitable relief as might be appropriate including, but not limited to permanent
`
`injunctions preventing and enjoining defendants, and each of them from:
`
`14
`
`z U
`
`i
`
`O ^ i oI
`g = ii
`
`CO d t —
`n
`O >
`^ ffl a ^
`
`O S d $
`
`y ^ ^ S3
`U. S3 S ^>
`u
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket