throbber
Case 2:21-cv-06240-PA-JEM Document 79-2 Filed 06/16/22 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:2054
`
`
`
`
`KEVIN P. MUCK (SBN 120918)
`kevin.muck@wilmerhale.com
`SUSAN S. MUCK (SBN 126930)
`susan.muck@wilmerhale.com
`JESSICA L. LEWIS (SBN 302467)
`jessica.lewis@wilmerhale.com
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
` AND DORR LLP
`One Front Street, Suite 3500
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (628) 235-1002
`Facsimile: (628) 235-1001
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Activision Blizzard,
`Inc., Robert A. Kotick, Dennis Durkin, Armin
`Zerza and Brian Kelly
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`GARY CHENG, Individually and on
`Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`Case No. 2:21-cv-06240-PA-JEM
`
`DECLARATION OF KEVIN P.
`MUCK IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
`DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`ROBERT A. KOTICK, DENNIS
`
`DURKIN, SPENCER NEUMANN,
`Date: August 15, 2022
`ARMIN ZERZA and BRIAN KELLY,
`Time: 1:30 p.m.
`Place: Courtroom 9A, First Street
` Courthouse
`Judge: The Honorable Percy Anderson
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECL. OF KEVIN P. MUCK
`ISO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`No. 2:21-CV-06240-PA-JEM
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06240-PA-JEM Document 79-2 Filed 06/16/22 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:2055
`
`
` I, Kevin P. Muck, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney admitted to practice before this Court, a member of
`
`the bar of the State of California, and a partner in the law firm of Wilmer Cutler
`
`Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, counsel for Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc.
`
`(“Activision” or the “Company”), Robert A. Kotick, Dennis Durkin, Armin Zerza,
`
`and Brian Kelly in this action. I submit this Declaration in support of the motion to
`
`dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal
`
`Securities Laws, filed jointly by my clients and a separately represented co-
`
`defendant, Spencer Neumann. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in
`
`this declaration and, if called upon, could testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a press release
`
`issued by Microsoft Corporation and Activision on January 18, 2022, publicly
`
`available on Activision’s website at https://investor.activision.com/node/34941/pdf.
`
`The copy attached as Exhibit A was obtained from Activision’s website on January
`
`25, 2022.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Activision’s Form
`
`8-K, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (”SEC”) on
`
`April 28, 2022.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a chart reflecting, among other things, daily
`
`closing prices for shares of Activision common stock for the alleged class period in
`
`this action (November 8, 2018 through November 16, 2021), as obtained from
`
`Bloomberg. The data contained in the chart attached as Exhibit C were obtained
`
`from Bloomberg on June 15, 2022.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Robert A. Kotick’s
`
`letter to all employees, dated July 27, 2021, publicly available on the Company’s
`
`website at https://investor.activision.com/node/34326/pdf. The copy attached as
`
`Exhibit D was obtained from Activision’s website on January 25, 2022.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Activision’s Notice
`-1-
`
`No. 2:21-CV-06240-PA-JEM
`
`DECL. OF KEVIN P. MUCK
`ISO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06240-PA-JEM Document 79-2 Filed 06/16/22 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:2056
`
`
`of Motion and Motion for Summary Adjudication filed on May 6, 2022, in the
`
`action captioned Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision
`
`Blizzard, Inc. et al., No. 21STCV26571 (California Superior Court, County of Los
`
`Angeles).
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of the “Order Re
`
`Hearing on Consent Decree,” entered by the Court on March 22, 2022 in the action
`
`captioned U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Activision Blizzard,
`
`Inc., et al., No. 2:21-CV-07682-DSF-JEM (U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal.) [ECF
`
`No. 76].
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the United States
`
`Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC”) “Commissioner Charges
`
`and Directed Investigations” webpage, publicly available on the EEOC’s website at
`
`https://www.eeoc.gov/commissioner-charges-and-directed-investigations. The
`
`copy attached as Exhibit G was obtained from the EEOC’s website on June 9, 2022.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the California
`
`Department of Fair Employment and Housing’s (“DFEH”) “Complaint Process”
`
`webpage, publicly available on the DFEH’s website at
`
`https://www.dfeh.ca.gov/complaintprocess/. The copy attached as Exhibit H was
`
`obtained from the DFEH’s website on June 9, 2022.
`
`10. Attached as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of a redline
`
`comparison of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint filed on December 3, 2021
`
`[ECF No. 39], and Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint filed on May 18, 2022
`
`[ECF No. 78], created by personnel at my law firm using Litera Compare and
`
`Microsoft Word software. Generally, text appearing in blue represents additions to
`
`the Second Amended Complaint, text appearing in red represents deletions, and text
`
`appearing in green represents text that has been moved.
`
`11. On June 3, 2022, counsel for all parties participated in a teleconference
`
`pursuant to Local Rule 7-3. The participants in that conference were: Brian
`-2-
`
`No. 2:21-CV-06240-PA-JEM
`
`DECL. OF KEVIN P. MUCK
`ISO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06240-PA-JEM Document 79-2 Filed 06/16/22 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:2057
`
`
`Alexander of The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., counsel for Plaintiffs; Craig Varnen of
`
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, counsel for defendant Spencer Neumann; and
`
`myself and my colleague, Jessica Lewis, counsel for Defendants Activision, Mr.
`
`Kotick, Mr. Durkin, Mr. Zerza, and Mr. Kelly. Both I and Mr. Neumann’s counsel
`
`explained the substance and specific bases for our respective clients’ contemplated
`
`motion to dismiss and why we believe the Second Amended Complaint does not
`
`state a claim against any of the Defendants, including the failure to allege falsity,
`
`scienter, or loss causation in accordance with applicable legal standards and the
`
`Court’s prior ruling dismissing the First Amended Complaint in this action.
`
`Plaintiffs’ counsel disagreed, and we were not able to reach a resolution that would
`
`eliminate the necessity of a hearing.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 16, 2022 at San
`
`Francisco, California.
`
` /s/ Kevin P. Muck
` Kevin P. Muck
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECL. OF KEVIN P. MUCK
`ISO MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`-3-
`
`No. 2:21-CV-06240-PA-JEM
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket