throbber
Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FREDERIC L. GORDON ATTORNEY AT LAW
`Frederic L. Gordon, Esq. (SBN 98994)
`23521 Estrella Place
`Valencia, CA 91355
`Phone: (619) 572-2210
`FGordonAPC@gmail.com
`
`
`
`MARLER CLARK, LLP, PS
`William D. Marler, Esq.,
`(pro hac vice application forthcoming)
`The Standard Building
`1012 1st Avenue, Fifth Floor
`Seattle, Washington 98104
`Phone: (206) 346-1888
`bmarler@marlerclark.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`MICHELLE WERNLI and EVAN
`)
`
`ALDRICH, on behalf of their minor son, )
`L. A.,
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`EURO FOODS, INC., a Pennsylvania
`)
`corporation, d/b/a CITTERIO USA;
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 2:21-cv-9420
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT FOR
`DAMAGES FOR:
`
`1st Cause of Action: Strict Liability
`2nd Cause of Action: Breach of
`Warranty
`3rd Cause of Action: Negligence
`4th Cause of Action: Negligence Per
`Se
`
`(DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL)
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 2 of 13 Page ID #:2
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs Michelle Wernli and Evan Aldrich, on behalf of their minor son, L.
`
`A., by and through their attorneys, Frederic L. Gordon and William D. Marler of
`
`Marler Clark LLP, PS (pro hac vice application forthcoming), allege upon
`
`information and belief as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`The plaintiffs, Michelle Wernli and Evan Aldrich, are the parents and
`
`legal guardians of their son, plaintiff L. A., who is under 18 years of age and thus a
`
`minor (collectively “Plaintiffs”). The Plaintiffs are residents and citizens of
`
`Moorpark, Ventura County, California.
`
`2.
`
`The defendant, Euro Foods, Inc., d/b/a Citterio USA (hereinafter
`
`“Citterio” or “Defendant”), is a domestic for-profit corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the Pennsylvania, with its principal place of business
`
`located at 2008 State Route 940 Freeland, Pennsylvania 18224. Citterio is a citizen
`
`of the State of Pennsylvania. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant operated
`
`Citterio USA and directly distributed its products to stores in the State of California.
`
`Further, at all times relevant, in order to facilitate selling its products in the State of
`
`California, Defendant maintained such minimum contacts with the State of
`
`California as to subject itself to laws and protections of California. Citterio was the
`
`manufacturer, supplier, packager, distributor, and/or seller of the adulterated food
`
`product that is the subject of this action.
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 3 of 13 Page ID #:3
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) because the matter in controversy exceeds
`
`$75,000.00, exclusive of costs, and it is between a foreign Defendant that is a citizen
`
`of the State of Pennsylvania, and Plaintiffs who are citizens of the State of California.
`
`At all times relevant to this action, Defendant maintained such minimum contacts
`
`with the State of California that this Court’s assertion of jurisdiction over the
`
`Defendant would not violate traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`
`4.
`
`Venue in the United States District Court for the Central District of
`
`California is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2) because a substantial part of
`
`the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims and causes of action occurred
`
`in this judicial district, and because the Defendant was subject to personal
`
`jurisdiction in this judicial district at the time of the commencement of the action.
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`The Salmonella Bacteria
`
`5.
`
`Salmonella is the second most common intestinal infection in the
`
`United States. More than 7,000 cases of Salmonella were confirmed in 2009;
`
`however, most cases go unreported. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
`
`(CDC) estimates that over 1 million people in the U.S. contract Salmonella each
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 4 of 13 Page ID #:4
`
`year, and that an average of 20,000 hospitalizations and almost 400 deaths occur
`
`from Salmonella poisoning, according to a 2011 report.
`
`6.
`
`Salmonella infections usually occur when a person eats food
`
`contaminated with the feces of animals or humans carrying the bacteria. Salmonella
`
`outbreaks are commonly associated with eggs, meat, and poultry, but these bacteria
`
`can also contaminate other foods, such as fruits and vegetables. Foods that are most
`
`likely to contain Salmonella include raw or undercooked eggs, raw milk,
`
`contaminated water, and raw or undercooked meats.
`
`7.
`
`Symptoms of Salmonella infection, or salmonellosis, range widely and
`
`are sometimes absent altogether. The most common symptoms include diarrhea,
`
`abdominal cramps, and fever.
`
`8.
`
`Typical symptoms of Salmonella infection appear 6 to 72 hours after
`
`eating contaminated food, last for 3 to 7 days without treatment, and usually consist
`
`of:
`
`• Diarrhea
`
`• Abdominal cramps
`
`• Fever of 100°F to 102°F
`
`• Bloody diarrhea
`
`• Vomiting
`
`• Headache
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 5 of 13 Page ID #:5
`
`• Body aches
`
`9.
`
`Complications of Salmonella poisoning are more likely to occur among
`
`young children and people of age 65 or older. Possible complications like reactive
`
`arthritis are thought to occur in 2 to 15 percent of Salmonella patients. Symptoms
`
`include inflammation of the joints, eyes, or reproductive or urinary organs. On
`
`average, symptoms appear 18 days after infection. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
`
`can also be a long-term complication.
`
`10.
`
`Salmonella infections generally last 3 to 7 days, and often do not require
`
`treatment. People with severe dehydration may need rehydration through an IV.
`
`Antibiotics are recommended for those at risk of invasive disease, including infants
`
`under three months old. Salmonella is treated with a 14-day course of antibiotics.
`
`Unfortunately, treatment of Salmonella has become more difficult as the pathogen
`
`has become more resistant to antibiotics. Finding the right antibiotic for a case of
`
`Salmonella is crucial to treating this bacterial infection.
`
`An Outbreak of Salmonella Linked to Salami Sticks
`
`
`11.
`
`Illnesses started on dates ranging from September 18, 2021, to October
`
`18, 2021. Ill people ranged in age from 1 to 75 years, with a median age of 7. Sixty-
`
`one percent of ill people were female. Of 24 people with information available, 6
`
`(25%) were hospitalized. No deaths were reported.
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 6 of 13 Page ID #:6
`
`12. On November 12, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
`
`(CDC) stated epidemiologic, traceback, and laboratory data show that Citterio brand
`
`Premium Italian-Style Salami Sticks were the likely cause of the outbreak. Among
`
`people interviewed by state and local public health officials, 100% reported eating
`
`salami sticks, and 96% reported eating or maybe eating Citterio brand Premium
`
`Italian-Style Salami Sticks.
`
`13. On November 10, 2021, Euro Foods, Inc. d/b/a Citterio USA, recalled
`
`approximately 119,091 pounds of salami stick products produced prior to October
`
`25, 2021, with “best by” dates through January 23, 2022, due to suspected
`
`contamination with the Salmonella bacteria.
`
`14. As of November 12, 2021, 31 people infected with the outbreak strain
`
`of Salmonella were reported from 10 states.
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF L. A.’S INJURIES
`
`15. During the week of September 27 – October 3, 2021, L. A. consumed
`
`at least one Citterio brand Premium Italian-Style Salami Stick that was later subject
`
`to Defendant’s recall.
`
`16. On October 4, 2021, L.A. woke up during the night with a fever. Later
`
`during the day, L.A. developed diarrhea, which eventually turned bloody, as well as
`
`severe stomach cramping.
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 7 of 13 Page ID #:7
`
`17. L.A. continued to have multiple bouts of diarrhea per day during the
`
`week of October 4, 2021, and was seen for a telemedicine appointment on October
`
`8, during which the treating physician ordered a stool culture. That culture eventually
`
`came back positive for Salmonella.
`
`18. Plaintiffs were thereafter contacted by Ventura County Public Health
`
`and were informed that L. A. was part of the outbreak attributed to Citterio brand
`
`Premium Italian-Style Salami Sticks.
`
`
`
`
`
`CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`Strict Liability – Count I
`
`19. The Plaintiffs incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 – 18 herein.
`
`20. At all times relevant hereto, Defendant was the manufacturer, supplier,
`
`packager, distributor, and/or seller of the adulterated food product that is the subject
`
`of this action.
`
`21. The adulterated food product that Defendant manufactured, supplied,
`
`packaged, distributed, and/or sold was, at the time it left Defendant’s control,
`
`defective and unreasonably dangerous for its ordinary and expected use because it
`
`contained Salmonella, a deadly pathogen.
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 8 of 13 Page ID #:8
`
`22. The adulterated food product that Defendant manufactured, supplied,
`
`packaged, distributed, and/or sold was delivered to the Plaintiffs without any change
`
`in
`
`its defective condition. The adulterated food product
`
`that Defendant
`
`manufactured, supplied, packaged, distributed, and/or sold was used in the manner
`
`expected and intended and was consumed by plaintiff L. A.
`
`23. Defendant owed a duty of care to the Plaintiffs to manufacture, supply,
`
`package, distribute, and/or sell food that was not adulterated, that was fit for human
`
`consumption, that was reasonably safe in construction, and that was free of
`
`pathogenic bacteria or other substances injurious to human health. Defendant
`
`breached this duty.
`
`24. Defendant owed a duty of care to the Plaintiffs to manufacture, supply,
`
`package, distribute, and/or sell food that was fit for human consumption and that
`
`was safe to consume to the extent contemplated by a reasonable consumer.
`
`Defendant breached this duty.
`
`25. Plaintiff L. A. suffered injuries and damages as a direct and proximate
`
`result of the defective and unreasonably dangerous condition of the adulterated food
`
`product that the Defendant manufactured, supplied, packaged, distributed, and/or
`
`sold.
`
`Breach of Warranty – Count II
`
`26. The Plaintiffs incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 – 25 herein.
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 9 of 13 Page ID #:9
`
`27. Defendant is liable to the Plaintiffs for breaching implied warranties
`
`that it made regarding the adulterated product that the Plaintiffs purchased. These
`
`implied warranties include the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness
`
`for a particular use. Specifically, Defendant impliedly warranted, through its design,
`
`manufacture, distribution, supply, and/or sale of food intended to be consumed by
`
`the public, by the statements and conduct of its employees and agents, and by the
`
`packaging of its product, that the food it prepared and sold was fit for human
`
`consumption and not otherwise adulterated or injurious to health.
`
`28. The contaminated food that Defendant sold would not pass without
`
`exception in the trade and was therefore in breach of the implied warranty of
`
`merchantability.
`
`29. The contaminated food sold to the Plaintiffs was not fit for the uses and
`
`purposes intended (i.e., human consumption); this product was therefore in breach
`
`of the implied warranty of fitness for its intended use.
`
`30. As a direct and proximate cause of the Defendant’s breach of
`
`warranties, as set forth above, plaintiff L. A. sustained injuries and damages in an
`
`amount to be determined at trial.
`
`Negligence – Count III
`
`31. The Plaintiffs incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 – 30 herein.
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 10 of 13 Page ID #:10
`
`32. Defendant owed to the Plaintiffs a duty to use reasonable care in the
`
`manufacture, supply, packaging, distribution, and sale of its food product, which
`
`duty would have prevented or eliminated the risk that Defendant’s food products
`
`would become contaminated with Salmonella or any other dangerous pathogen.
`
`Defendant breached this duty by manufacturing, distributing, supplying, and/or
`
`selling food products contaminated with Salmonella, and was therefore negligent.
`
`33. Defendant had a duty to comply with all federal, state, and local
`
`statutes, laws, regulations, safety codes, and provisions pertaining to the
`
`manufacture, distribution, storage, and sale of its food product, but failed to do so,
`
`and was therefore negligent. The Plaintiffs were among the class of persons designed
`
`to be protected by these statutes, laws, regulations, safety codes, and provisions
`
`pertaining to the manufacture, distribution, storage, and sale of similar food
`
`products. By manufacturing, distributing, supplying, and/or selling food products
`
`contaminated with Salmonella, Defendant breached this duty and was therefore
`
`negligent.
`
`34. Defendant had a duty to properly supervise, train, and monitor its
`
`respective employees, and to ensure that its respective employees complied with all
`
`applicable statutes, laws, regulations, safety codes, and provisions pertaining to the
`
`manufacture, distribution, storage, and sale of similar food products. By
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 11 of 13 Page ID #:11
`
`manufacturing, distributing, supplying, and/or selling food products contaminated
`
`with Salmonella, Defendant breached this duty and was therefore negligent.
`
`35. Defendant had a duty to use ingredients, supplies, and other constituent
`
`materials that were reasonably safe, wholesome, and free of defects; that otherwise
`
`complied with applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations,
`
`codes, and provisions; and that were clean, free from adulteration, and safe for
`
`human consumption. By manufacturing, distributing, supplying, and/or selling food
`
`products contaminated with Salmonella, Defendant breached this duty and was
`
`therefore negligent.
`
`36. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s negligence, plaintiff L.
`
`A. sustained injuries and damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
`
`
`
`Negligence Per Se – Count IV
`
`37. The Plaintiffs incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 – 36 herein.
`
`38. Defendant had a duty to comply with all applicable state and federal
`
`regulations intended to ensure the purity and safety of its food products, including
`
`the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 301, et
`
`seq.).
`
`39. By manufacturing, distributing, supplying, and/or selling food products
`
`contaminated with Salmonella, Defendant breached that duty and, as a result, was
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 12 of 13 Page ID #:12
`
`negligent per se in its manufacture, distribution, and sale of food adulterated with
`
`Salmonella, a deadly pathogen.
`
`40. As a direct and proximate result of the negligent per se conduct by
`
`Defendant, plaintiff L. A. sustained injuries and damages in an amount to be
`
`determined at trial.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF:
`
`WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs pray as follows:
`
`(1) For judgment against Defendant on Count I of this Petition in an
`
`amount that is fair and reasonable, but no less than $75,000.01, for their
`
`costs incurred, and for any other relief to which they may be entitled;
`
`(2) For judgment against Defendant on Count II of this Petition in an
`
`amount that is fair and reasonable, but no less than $75,000.01, for their
`
`costs incurred, and for any other relief to which they may be entitled;
`
`(3) For judgment against Defendant on Count III of this Petition in an
`
`amount that is fair and reasonable, but no less than $75,000.01, for their
`
`costs incurred, and for any other relief to which they may be entitled;
`
`(4) For judgment against Defendant on Count IV of this Petition in an
`
`amount that is fair and reasonable, but no less than $75,000.01, for their
`
`costs incurred, and for any other relief to which they may be entitled;
`
`(5) For costs of suit herein incurred; and
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-09420 Document 1 Filed 12/03/21 Page 13 of 13 Page ID #:13
`
`
`(6) For such other and further relief as this Court may deem proper.
`
`
`
`
`DATED: December 3, 2021
`
`
`
`FREDERIC L. GORDON, ESQ.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Frederic L. Gordon
`
`Frederic L. Gordon, Esq. (SBN 98994)
`23521 Estrella Place
`Valencia, CA 91355
`Phone: (619) 572-2210
`FGordonAPC@gmail.com
`
`
`
`
`-And-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ William D. Marler
`
`William D. Marler, Esq.,
`(pro hac vice application forthcoming)
`MARLER CLARK, LLP, PS
`The Standard Building
`1012 1st Avenue, Fifth Floor
`Seattle, Washington 98104
`Phone: (206) 346-1888
`bmarler@marlerclark.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys For Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs hereby demand a jury trial as provided by Rule 38(a) of the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Frederic L. Gordon
`FREDERIC L. GORDON
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`_____________________________________________________________________________
`PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket