throbber
Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:13
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`Exh 2 - pg 12
`
`

`

`miectronically rileo oy oupenor loOUR or t..,aurornia, L,ounty or urange, vzi I //zuzz ui.zz:zi
`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:14
`1,246137-CU-VVT-CJC - ROA # 2 - DAVID H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court By Halley McMaster, Deputy
`30-2022
`
`Michael J. Curls (SBN 159651)
`Nichelle D. Jordan (SBN 186308)
`LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. CURLS
`4340 Leimert Blvd., Suite 200
`Los Angeles, CA 90008 c
`Telephone: (323) 293-2314
`Facsimile:
`(323) 293-2350
`nichelle@mjclawoffice.com
`Email:
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff JESSICA GHOLSON
`
`SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER
`
`JESSICA GHOLSON, an individual
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VS.
`
`Case No.: 30-2022-01246137 -C U-Wr-CJ C
`Assigned for All Purposes
`J udge Theodore Howard
`
`PLAINTIFF JESSICA GHOLSON'S
`COMPLAINT FOR:
`
`BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC., a
`Virginia Corporation, ROBERT
`MCALONAN, an individual, and DOES 1
`through 10, inclusive,
`
`Defendants
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Gender Discrimination in Violation
`of the Fair Employment and Housing
`Act
`Disability Discrimination in
`Violation of the Fair Employment
`and Housing Act
`Retaliation in Violation of the Fair
`Employment and Housing Act
`Harassment in Violation of the Fair
`Employment and Housing Act
`Failure to Prevent Discrimination,
`Harassment and Retaliation in
`Violation of the Fair Employment
`and Housing Act
`Constructive Termination in
`Violation of the Fair Employment
`and Housing Act
`Constructive Termination in
`Violation of Public Policy
`Intentional Infliction of Emotional
`Distress
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`-1-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Exh 2 - pg 13
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 3 of 16 Page ID #:15
`
`Plaintiff JESSICA GHOLSON alleges:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1. This is a Complaint by Plaintiff JESSICA GHOLSON (Hereinafter referred to as
`
`"Plaintiff') against her former employer BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. (Hereinafter
`
`referred to as "BEACON" or "Defendant") for discrimination, retaliation, harassment,
`
`constructive termination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff seeks
`
`compensatory and punitive damages.
`
`2. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff JESSICA GHOLSON ("Plaintiff') is and has been
`
`an individual residing in Los Angeles County, California.
`
`3. Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that basis alleges that her former employer,
`
`BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. is a Virginia Corporation limited qualified to do business
`
`in the State of California, and has a principal place of business located in the County of Orange,
`
`City of Cypress at 5665 Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Cypress, CA 90630.
`
`4. Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant ROBERT MCALONAN is an
`
`individual residing in the State of California, San Francisco Bay area.
`
`5. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise of
`
`Defendants Does 1 through 10, and each of them, are unknown to Plaintiff at this time, and
`
`therefore they are sued by such fictitious names.
`
`6. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the Defendants herein, and
`
`each of them, are in some manner negligent, or otherwise responsible, for directly and
`
`proximately causing the injuries and damages hereinafter set forth.
`
`7. At all times herein mentioned, the Defendants, and each of them, were principals and/or
`
`agents, servants, or employees of said principals; all the acts performed by each of said
`
`Defendants as agents, servants or employees were done within the scope of their agency,
`
`employment and/or authority of said agency and employment and with the consent of each co-
`
`Defendant.
`
`8. The acts committed by DOES 1 through 10, and as described in this Complaint were duly
`
`authorized and directed by its officers, directors and/or managing agents. In addition, the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-2-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Exh 2 - pg 14
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 4 of 16 Page ID #:16
`
`employers identified herein participated in the acts of its employees and agents as described in
`
`this Complaint, and ratified or accepted the benefits of such acts.
`
`FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`9. Plaintiff, an African-American female was hired by BEACON in June 2014. Plaintiff
`
`held the position of Provider Quality Manager since October 1, 2020.
`
`10. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff has been an exemplary employee with no
`
`performance issues until she started working with her manager, Defendant Robert McAlonan
`
`("Mr. McAlonan.") Plaintiff's working conditions became increasingly hostile when she
`
`returned from bereavement leave following the death of her father in July 2020.
`
`1 1. When Plaintiff informed Mr. McAlonan that she was struggling and thought that she
`
`needed to hire a therapist, Mr. McAlonan's behavior started to escalate into a hostile work
`
`environment.
`
`12. For example, Mr. McAlonan directed Plaintiff to perform administrative and or
`
`secretarial tasks that were not a part of her job description and were not required by Plaintiff's
`
`White male colleagues.
`
`13. When Plaintiff complained to Mr. McAlonan and other managers at Beacon that she felt
`
`that he was discriminating against her based upon her gender, Plaintiff was issued a written
`
`warning for alleged "performance issues." However, no performance issues were brought to
`
`Plaintiff's attention prior to her reporting her complaints of discrimination and retaliation.
`
`14. Prior to receipt of the written warning, Plaintiff shared her concern directly with Mr.
`
`McAlonan as well as her managers, Amy Pearlman, Kristin Slater and Itohan Oyamaden. In
`
`response to her complaints, Mr. McAlonan's demeanor towards her changed significantly
`
`creating a hostile work environment followed by the baseless written warning.
`
`15. Prior to the issuance of the written warning, Mr. McAlonan expressed his anger that
`
`Plaintiff escalated her concerns about the way that he treated her to her manager, Kristin Slater.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes, and therefore alleges that in response to this frustration, Mr.
`
`McAlonan fabricated reasons to issue discipline to Plaintiff.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-3-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Exh 2 - pg 15
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 5 of 16 Page ID #:17
`
`16. Prior to complaining about the hostile work environment that she was subjected to,
`
`Plaintiff was not informed about any performance issues. When Plaintiff inquired about the
`
`performance issues that supported the write up, Mr. McAlonan could only cite the "catch-all"
`
`offense of violation of "code of conduct."
`
`17. Prior to Mr. McAlonan, Plaintiff worked for four other managers without incident. Mr.
`
`McAlonan's belief that he "could not ask Plaintiff to do anything" is based solely on Plaintiff's
`
`report that she felt that Mr. McAlonan was demeaning and belittling Plaintiff because of her
`
`gender when Mr. McAlonan asked her to perform secretarial duties.
`
`18. The allegations by Mr. McAlonan about Plaintiff's work performance in combination
`
`with the manner in which he treated her after she tried to report her experience of a hostile work
`
`environment exacerbated a health condition that was known to Beacon prior to Mr. McAlonan's
`
`actions. As such, it became necessary for Plaintiff to take a medical leave of absence.
`
`19. While out on her medical leave of absence, Mr. McAlonan continued to harass Plaintiff
`
`by making continuous contact with her about work issues throughout her leave. Mr. McAlonan
`
`contacted Plaintiff on numerous occasions by text and email to inquire about her return during
`
`her leave.
`
`20.Not only did Beacon provide a hostile work environment for Plaintiff and continue to
`
`harass her during her medical leave of absence, her manager, Mr. McAlonan specifically
`
`admonished her, on numerous occasions, that it would probably be in Plaintiff's best interest to
`
`find alternate employment. Mr. McAlonan began suggesting that Plaintiff find alternate
`
`employment after she reported that she may need to see a therapist following her father's death.
`
`21. Concerned for her job security, Plaintiff reported Mr. McAlonan's statements to her
`
`managers, including Itohan Oyamaden and Kristen Slater because she was fearful that perhaps
`
`there was a company restructure or some other reason for Mr. McAlonan's repeated assertions
`
`that she should find another job.
`
`22. Both managers assured her that to their knowledge, there was no restructure or any other
`
`reason that Plaintiff's job was in jeopardy. Yet, Mr. McAlonan continued to suggest alternate
`
`employment. Thus, Mr. McAlonan was misrepresenting to Plaintiff the need to find a new job
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-4-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Exh 2 - pg 16
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 6 of 16 Page ID #:18
`
`and Plaintiff is informed and therefore alleges that the misrepresentation was the result of
`
`discrimination and retaliation on the part of Mr. McAlonan.
`
`23. Plaintiff did not want to leave her place of employment, however as a result of the hostile
`
`work environment and Mr. McAlonan's specific admonishment, Plaintiff believed that she did
`
`not have any other option but to resign.
`
`24. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiff was performing satisfactory in her position of
`
`employment.
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION IN VIOLATION OF
`
`THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT
`
`(Against Defendant BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC.)
`
`25. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 24 of this Complaint.
`
`26. The actions of Defendant, as described in this Complaint, constitute unlawful
`
`discrimination on the basis of Plaintiff's gender. Defendant violated the Fair Employment and
`
`Housing Act as promulgated in Government Code Section 12940 et seq. and other state and
`
`federal statutes which prohibit retaliation and discrimination in employment.
`
`27. The discrimination by Defendant impeded Plaintiff's progress and the enjoyment of her
`
`employment at BEACON.
`
`28. Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies by timely filing a charge of
`
`discrimination, harassment and retaliation with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
`
`Commission. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued to Plaintiff a right t
`
`sue letter permitting her to file a private lawsuit against Defendants.
`
`29. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's discrimination, Plaintiff has suffered and
`
`will continue to suffer damages in an amount within the jurisdiction of this court, the exact
`
`amount to be proven at trial. Such damages include:
`
`a:
`
`loss of salary and other valuable employment benefits;
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-5-
`
`COMPLAIN
`
`Exh 2 - pg 17
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 7 of 16 Page ID #:19
`
`b:
`
`prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages for
`
`shame, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress
`
`caused by the conduct of the Defendant;
`
`c:
`
`other consequential damages, including damages for shame,
`
`humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress caused by
`
`the conduct of Defendant.
`
`30. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to her Attorney's fees in prosecuting this lawsuit, pursuan
`
`to Government Code § 12965(b).
`
`31. Further, because the wrongful acts against Plaintiff were carried out, authorized by
`
`Defendants' directors, officers and/or managing agents, acting with malice, oppression or fraud,
`
`or were deliberate, willful and in conscious disregard of the probability of causing injury to
`
`Plaintiff, as reflected by the actions as described earlier in this Complaint, she seeks punitive
`
`damages against Defendants, in order to deter them from such and similar conduct in the future.
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN VIOLATION OF
`
`THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT
`
`(Against All Defendant BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC.)
`
`32. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 31 of this Complaint.
`
`33. The actions of Defendant, as described in this Complaint, constitute unlawful
`
`discrimination on the basis of Plaintiff's medical disability. Defendant violated the Fair
`
`Employment and Housing Act as promulgated in Government Code Section 12940 et seq. and
`
`other state and federal statutes which prohibit retaliation and discrimination in employment.
`
`34. The discrimination by Defendant impeded Plaintiff's progress and the enjoyment of her
`
`employment at BEACON.
`
`35. Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies by timely a charge of discrimination
`
`and harassment with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The U.S. Equal
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-6-
`
`COMPLAIN
`
`Exh 2 - pg 18
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 8 of 16 Page ID #:20
`
`Employment Opportunity Commission issued to Plaintiff a right to letter permitting her to file a
`
`private lawsuit against Defendants.
`
`36. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's discrimination, Plaintiff has suffered and
`
`will continue to suffer damages in an amount within the jurisdiction of this court, the exact
`
`amount to be proven at trial. Such damages include:
`
`a:
`
`b:
`
`loss of salary and other valuable employment benefits;
`
`prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages for
`
`shame, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress
`
`caused by the conduct of the Defendant;
`
`c:
`
`other consequential damages, including damages for shame,
`
`humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress caused by
`
`the conduct of Defendant.
`
`37. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to her Attorney's fees in prosecuting this lawsuit, pursuan
`
`to Government Code § 12965(b).
`
`38. Further, because the wrongful acts against Plaintiff were carried out, authorized by
`
`Defendants' directors, officers and/or managing agents, acting with malice, oppression or fraud,
`
`or were deliberate, willful and in conscious disregard of the probability of causing injury to
`
`Plaintiff, as reflected by the actions as described earlier in this Complaint, she seeks punitive
`
`damages against Defendants, in order to deter them from such and similar conduct in the future.
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF
`
`THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT
`
`(Against Defendant BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC.)
`
`39. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 38 of this Complaint.
`
`40. The actions of Defendant, as described in this Complaint, constitute unlawful retaliation
`
`against Plaintiff for her complaints of gender based discrimination and harassment and for
`
`engaging in the protected activity of taking medical leave.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-7-
`
`COMPLAIN
`
`Exh 2 - pg 19
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 9 of 16 Page ID #:21
`
`41. Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies by timely a charge of retaliation with
`
`the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The U.S. Equal Employment
`
`Opportunity Commission issued to Plaintiff a right to letter permitting her to file a private
`
`lawsuit against Defendants.
`
`42. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's retaliation, Plaintiff has suffered and will
`
`continue to suffer damages in an amount within the jurisdiction of this court, the exact amount to
`
`be proven at trial. Such damages include:
`
`a:
`
`b:
`
`loss of salary and other valuable employment benefits;
`
`prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages for
`
`shame, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress
`
`caused by the conduct of the Defendant;
`
`c:
`
`other consequential damages, including damages for shame,
`
`humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress caused by
`
`the conduct of Defendant.
`
`43. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to her Attorney's fees in prosecuting this lawsuit, pursuan
`
`to Government Code § 12965(b).
`
`44. Further, because the wrongful acts against Plaintiff were carried out, authorized by
`
`Defendants' directors, officers and/or managing agents, acting with malice, oppression or fraud,
`
`or were deliberate, willful and in conscious disregard of the probability of causing injury to
`
`Plaintiff, as reflected by the actions as described earlier in this Complaint, she seeks punitive
`
`damages against Defendants, in order to deter them from such and similar conduct in the future.
`
`FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`HARASSMENT IN VIOLATION OF
`
`THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT
`
`GOVERNMENT CODE § 12940 (J)
`
`(Against All Defendants)
`
`45. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 44 of this Complaint.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-8-
`
`COMPLAIN
`
`Exh 2 - pg 20
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 10 of 16 Page ID #:22
`
`46. Beginning in or about October 2020, Defendant Robert McAlonan while acting in the
`
`course and scope of her employment at BEACON and discriminated against Plaintiff as alleged
`
`herein. The harassment was sufficiently pervasive and severe as to alter the conditions of
`
`Plaintiff's employment and to create a hostile, intimidating, and/or abusive work environment.
`
`Defendants' acts of harassment included, without limitation, the following:
`
`a. Creating and allowing a hostile environment to exist for Plaintiff including verbal
`
`harassment, demeaning conduct, bullying, and threats and intimidation based on
`
`Plaintiff's gender, female.
`
`b. Threatening Plaintiff's employment while on a medical leave of absence
`
`c. All conduct described in the Facts section of this complaint.
`
`47. The sexual harassment against Plaintiff by Mr. McAlonan was condoned, permitted and
`
`encouraged by Beacon, in a manner which was grossly negligent, reckless, willful, malicious and
`
`deliberately indifferent to the Plaintiff's personal rights to a discrimination free work
`
`environment and safety in the work-place. Beacon failed to prevent sexual harassment from
`
`occurring in the work-place.
`
`48. The acts and conduct of Defendants, and each of them, as aforesaid, was in violation of
`
`California Government Code § 12940 et seq. Said statutes impose certain duties upon
`
`Defendants, and each of them, concerning discrimination and harassment against persons, such
`
`as the Plaintiff, on the basis of gender. Said statutes were intended to prevent the type of injury
`
`and damage set forth herein. Plaintiff was, at all times herein mentioned, a member of the class
`
`of persons intended to be protected by said statutes. At all times herein mentioned, Plaintiff was
`
`a person of the female sex and therefore entitled to the protection of California Government
`
`Code § 12940 et seq.
`
`49. As a direct and legal result of Defendants' willful, wanton, intentional, malicious and/or
`
`reckless conduct and the policies alleged herein, Plaintiff suffered severe and extreme mental an
`
`emotional distress, including but not limited to anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of
`
`confidence, fright, depression and anxiety, the exact nature and extent of which are not now
`
`known to her. Plaintiff does not at this time know the exact duration or permanence of said
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-9-
`
`COMPLAIN
`
`Exh 2 - pg 21
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 11 of 16 Page ID #:23
`
`injuries, but is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that some of the injuries are
`
`reasonably certain to be permanent in character. By the aforesaid acts and omissions of
`
`defendants, and each of them, Plaintiff has been directly and legally caused to suffer damages as
`
`alleged herein.
`
`50. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the Defendants, and each of
`
`them, by the acts of its managing agents, officers and/or directors in the aforementioned acts
`
`and/or ratifying such acts, engaged in willful, malicious, intentional, oppressive and despicable
`
`conduct, and acted with willful and conscious disregard of the rights, welfare and safety of
`
`Plaintiff, thereby justifying the award of punitive and exemplary damages, against Defendants in
`
`an amount to be determined at trial.
`
`51. As a result of Defendants' harassment as alleged herein, Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable
`
`attorney's fees and costs of said suit as provided by Cal. Govt. Code Section 12965(b).
`
`FAILURE TO MAINTAIN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT FREE WORK
`
`FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`ENVIRONMENT N IN VIOLATION OF
`
`THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT
`
`GOVERNMENT CODE § 12940 (k)
`
`(Against Defendant BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC.)
`
`52. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 51 of this Complaint.
`
`53. California Government Code § 12940 (k) prohibits an employer from failing to take all
`
`reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
`
`54. Defendant was at all relevant times an employer within the meaning of California
`
`Government Code § 12926 (d) and as such had a duty to take all reasonable steps necessary to
`
`prevent discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
`
`55. Through the acts described fully in the paragraphs above, Defendant violated California
`
`Government Code § 12940 (k) since it failed to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent
`
`discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-10-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Exh 2 - pg 22
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 12 of 16 Page ID #:24
`
`56. The failure of Defendant to take reasonable steps to prevent discrimination and
`
`harassment has caused Plaintiff to sustain substantial losses.
`
`57. Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies by timely filing charges of
`
`discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the U.S. Equal
`
`Employment Opportunity Commission has issued to Plaintiff a right to sue letter permitting her
`
`to file this lawsuit against Defendants.
`
`58. As a direct, foreseeable and proximate result of Defendant's willful, knowing and
`
`intentional failure to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and
`
`harassment, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer humiliation, embarrassment, mental
`
`anguish, emotional distress and discomfort, all to his damage, the precise amount which will be
`
`proven at trial. Such damages include:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`loss of salary and other valuable employment benefits;
`
`prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages at
`
`the legal rate; and
`
`c.
`
`other consequential damages, including damages for shame,
`
`humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress caused by
`
`Defendants' conduct.
`
`59. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to her attorney's fees in prosecuting this lawsuit, pursuant
`
`to Government Code § 12965 (b).
`
`SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF
`
`THE FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT
`
`(Against Defendant BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC.)
`
`60. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 59 of this Complaint.
`
`61. As a further act of discrimination and in retaliation for protesting discriminatory conduct
`
`and invoking protected medical leave time, Plaintiff was forced to resign from her employment
`
`at Beacon.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-11-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Exh 2 - pg 23
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 13 of 16 Page ID #:25
`
`62. Plaintiffs forced resignation violates the Fair Employment and Housing Act as set forth
`
`in Government Code § 12940 et seq which mandates that employees be free from discrimination
`
`and retaliation in the workplace.
`
`63. Plaintiff has exhausted her administrative remedies by timely a charge of discrimination
`
`and harassment with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. The Department of Fair
`
`Employment and Housing issued to Plaintiff a right to letter permitting her to file a private
`
`lawsuit against Defendants.
`
`64. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's retaliation and discrimination, Plaintiff
`
`has suffered and will continue to suffer damages in an amount within the jurisdiction of this
`
`court, the exact amount to be proven at trial. Such damages include:
`
`a:
`
`b:
`
`loss of salary and other valuable employment benefits;
`
`prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages for
`
`shame, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress
`
`caused by the conduct of the Defendant;
`
`c:
`
`other consequential damages, including damages for shame,
`
`humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress caused by
`
`the conduct of Defendant.
`
`65. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to her Attorney's fees in prosecuting this lawsuit, pursuan
`
`to Government Code § 12965(b).
`
`66. Further, because the wrongful acts against Plaintiff were carried out, authorized by
`
`Defendants' directors, officers and/or managing agents, acting with malice, oppression or fraud,
`
`or were deliberate, willful and in conscious disregard of the probability of causing injury to
`
`Plaintiff, as reflected by the actions as described earlier in this Complaint, she seeks punitive
`
`damages against Defendants, in order to deter them from such and similar conduct in the future.
`
`///
`
`///
`
`///
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-12-
`
`COMPLAIN
`
`Exh 2 - pg 24
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 14 of 16 Page ID #:26
`
`SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`WRONGFUL TERMINATION
`
`IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY
`
`(Plaintiff Against All Defendants)
`
`67. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth paragraphs 1
`
`through 66 of this Complaint.
`
`68. Plaintiff was subjected to discriminatory disparate treatment because of her gender and
`
`medical disability. Plaintiff was forced to resign from BEACON as a result of her gender; and in
`
`retaliation for taking medical leave.
`
`69. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff has sustained and will
`
`continue to suffer damages in an amount within the jurisdiction of this court, the exact amount to
`
`be proven at trial. Such damages include:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`loss of salary and other valuable employment benefits;
`
`prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages at
`
`the legal rate; and
`
`c.
`
`other consequential damages, including damages for shame,
`
`humiliation, mental anguish and emotional distress caused by
`
`Defendant's conduct.
`
`EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
`
`(Against All Defendants)
`
`70. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by this reference as if fully set forth herein paragraphs
`
`1 through 69 of this Complaint.
`
`71. Defendant Robert McAlonan intentionally and/or recklessly sought to cause Plaintiff
`
`emotional harm because of her gender, in retaliation for Plaintiffs complaints about gender
`
`discrimination and in retaliation for Plaintiff's taking a medical leave of absence.
`
`72. Beacon intentionally and/or recklessly failed to intervene and create a safe working
`
`environment for Plaintiff
`
`-13-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Exh 2 - pg 25
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 15 of 16 Page ID #:27
`
`73. Beacon is a provider of mental health services.
`
`74. At the time of the incidents giving rise to Plaintiff's complaint, the Defendants knew or
`
`should have known that the COVID-19 global pandemic exacerbated stressors that individuals
`
`such as Plaintiff faced on a day to day basis.
`
`75. At the time of the incidents giving rise to Plaintiff's complaint, the Defendants knew or
`
`should have known that Plaintiff shared a very close and loving relationship with her father and
`
`that she was grieving his loss.
`
`76. Nevertheless, the Defendants and each of them continued to harass and allow Plaintiff to
`
`be harassed at her place of employment, even during her medical leave of absence.
`
`77. Defendants knew or should have known that the harassment by Defendants and the
`
`suggestion that Plaintiff find alternate employment during a global pandemic intensified
`
`Plaintiff's emotional distress.
`
`78. By engaging in the acts alleged herein, Defendants and each of them, engaged in
`
`outrageous conduct with an intent to or a reckless disregard of the probability of causing Plaintiff
`
`to suffer emotional distress.
`
`79. As a direct, proximate and foreseeable result, Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress
`
`and the outrageous conduct was the cause of the emotional distress suffered by Plaintiff.
`
`80. The conduct of Defendants also amounts to oppression, fraud or malice within the
`
`meaning of California Civil Code §3294 et seq. and punitive damages should be assessed against
`
`the Defendants for the purpose of punishment and for the sake of example.
`
`WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF JESSICA GHOLSON PRAYS FOR JUDGMENT
`
`AGAINST DEFENDANTS AND EACH OF THEM AS FOLLOWS:
`
`A. For economic damages according to proof;
`
`B.
`
`For general, special and incidental damages and amounts for emotional
`
`distress according to proof;
`
`C.
`
`For punitive damages against Doe Defendants in an amount appropriate to
`
`punish Defendant for her wrongful conduct and set an example for others;
`
`2
`
`4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`-14-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Exh 2 - pg 26
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-00445-JVS-DFM Document 1-2 Filed 03/22/22 Page 16 of 16 Page ID #:28
`
`D. For prejudgment interest and interest on the sum of damages awarded to
`
`the maximum extent permitted by law;
`
`E.
`
`For an injunction against gender and disability-based harassment,
`
`discrimination and retaliation in the future;
`
`F.
`
`Creation of a Court supervised policy against gender and disability-based
`
`harassment, discrimination and retaliation;
`
`G. Imposition of periodic reporting requirements on the Company;
`
`H. For reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to Government Code § 12965 (b);
`
`I.
`
`For costs of suit herein incurred; and
`
`J.
`
`For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.
`
`DATED: February 17, 2022
`
`LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. CURLS
`
`. Jordan,
`By: Nich
`laintiff
`Attorneys
`JESSICA GHOLSON
`
`PLAINTIFF JESSICA GHOLSON DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL.
`
`DATED: February 17, 2022
`
`LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. CURLS
`
`II. Jordan,
`By: Nic -
`Attorneys40t laintiff
`JESSICA GHOLSON
`
`-15-
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`1 1
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Exh 2 - pg 27
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket