throbber
Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 1 of 43 Page ID #:1
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Adam E. Polk (SBN 273000)
`Jordan Elias (SBN 228731)
`Simon Grille (SBN 294914)
`Jordan Isern (SBN 343159)
`GIRARD SHARP LLP
`601 California Street, Suite 1400
`San Francisco, CA 94108
`Telephone: (415) 981-4800
`apolk@girardsharp.com
`jelias@girardsharp.com
`sgrille@girardsharp.com
`jisern@girardsharp.com
`
`Paige M. Tomaselli (SBN 237737)
`Dylan D. Grimes (SBN 302981)
`GRIME LAW LLP
`730 Arizona Avenue
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`Telephone: (310) 747-5095
`ptomaselli@grimelaw.com
`dgrimes@grimelaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`Gretchen Elsner (pro hac vice forthcoming)
`ELSNER LAW & POLICY, LLC
`314 South Guadalupe Street, Suite 123
`Santa Fe, NM 87501
`Telephone: (505) 303-0980
`gretchen@elsnerlaw.org
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`Case No. 8:22-CV-01562
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SARA SAFARI, PEYMON
`KHAGHANI, and JASON ROSE, on
`behalf of themselves and all others
`similarly situated, and FARM
`FORWARD, on behalf of the general
`public,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., a
`Texas corporation,
`Defendant.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 1
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 2 of 43 Page ID #:2
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Plaintiffs Sara Safari, Peymon Khaghani, and Jason Rose (“Consumer Plaintiffs”),
`on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and nonprofit organization
`Plaintiff Farm Forward (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) file this Class Action Complaint against
`Whole Foods Market, Inc. (“Whole Foods”) and allege as follows:
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`1.
`consumer
`fraud
`action
`concerns Whole Foods’ material
`This
`misrepresentations and omissions about the use of antibiotics in the beef it sells. Whole
`Foods markets its beef with the slogan, “No Antibiotics, Ever” and reinforces this
`promotional message that its beef is antibiotic-free with other similar representations at
`retail stores, in online marketing, and on product packaging. But, as independent testing
`has shown, Whole Foods’ claim that it sells only antibiotic-free beef is false. Plaintiffs
`bring this action to stop Whole Foods’ misleading promotion and sale of beef, including
`the products listed in paragraph 40 below (“Beef Products” or the “Products”), and the
`Consumer Plaintiffs seek to recover damages for themselves and other purchasers of these
`Products in California.
`2.
`Plaintiff Farm Forward—a nonprofit organization seeking to end factory
`farming—recently found that beef sold by Whole Foods contained antibiotic and other
`pharmaceutical residue. The presence of this residue demonstrates the cattle were treated
`with antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals while being raised. Farm Forward seeks
`injunctive relief through this action.
`3. Whole Foods’ internal emails show that its executives rejected the
`opportunity to investigate the accuracy of its “No Antibiotics, Ever” claims, in part
`because “the repercussions for having a positive result were beyond ridiculous[.]”
`Unreceptive to testing cattle in its supply chain, Whole Foods continued promoting its
`beef products as antibiotic-free.
`4.
`Administering routine or subtherapeutic antibiotics to farmed animals creates
`serious health risks. It contributes to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 2
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 3 of 43 Page ID #:3
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`animals—bacteria that consumers of the meat eventually ingest.1 Once in the human
`system, these bacteria can cause infections that cannot be treated with existing antibiotics
`because the bacteria is antibiotic-resistant.2
`5.
`Consumers overpaid for and were economically harmed as a result of Whole
`Foods’ misleading promotion of its Beef Products. Whole Foods charges—and
`consumers pay—a substantial price premium for Beef Products based on the claim that
`the cattle that become these Products were not given any antibiotics. For instance, Whole
`Foods charges $31.99 per pound for beef tenderloin steak filet mignon. A traditional
`retailer charges only $24.99 per pound for the same cut of beef. Thus, Whole Foods
`marks up the price of this Beef Product by 28% in connection with its antibiotic-free
`representations. Consumer Plaintiffs would not have purchased Beef Products, or would
`not have paid the prices they did, had they had known the truth that cattle used in the
`Products were raised with antibiotics.
`6.
`Plaintiffs seek an injunction requiring Whole Foods to correct and clarify its
`past and ongoing misrepresentations and omissions, and to remove the misrepresentations
`or, in the alternative, to ensure that Whole Foods’ Beef Products conform with how it
`markets them. Consumer Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Class, further seek to recover their
`overpayments for Beef Products due to Whole Foods’ false advertising.
`PARTIES
`
`A.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`Sara Safari
`Plaintiff Sara Safari is a citizen and resident of Tustin, California.
`
`7.
`
`
`1 Lisa L. Gill, Is Our Meat Safe to Eat?, 87 Consumer Rep. 31, 36 (2022).
`2 Lesley Stahl, Is overuse of antibiotics on farms worsening the spread of antibiotic-
`resistant bacteria?, CBS News (Jan. 5, 2020), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-
`overuse-of-antibiotics-on-farms-worsening-the-spread-of-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria-
`60-minutes-2020-01-05/.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 3
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 4 of 43 Page ID #:4
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`8.
`Since approximately 2010 and within the applicable limitations period, Ms.
`Safari has purchased Beef Products at Whole Foods on numerous occasions. She mostly
`recently purchased Beef Products from Whole Foods in or around June 2022.
`9. Ms. Safari purchased the Products at Whole Foods’ retail stores, including
`its store located at 2847 Park Avenue in Tustin, California.
`10. Ms. Safari saw and relied on Whole Foods representations concerning its
`Beef Products in-store, on its website, in its listings on Amazon, and on the Products’
`packaging. Ms. Safari saw and relied on Whole Foods’ “No Antibiotics, Ever” and “No
`antibiotics or added growth hormones, ever” slogans prior to purchasing the Beef
`Products.
`11. Ms. Safari purchased the Beef Products at a premium price because, based
`on Whole Foods’ representations, she believed all Whole Foods Beef Products derived
`from cattle raised without antibiotics or pharmaceuticals. Choosing antibiotic-free meat
`is important to Ms. Safari because she does not want to fund or support a farming model
`that uses pharmaceuticals as part of raising the animals in crowded, unsanitary
`conditions. Ms. Safari also does not want to fund or support this farming model because
`it contributes to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and may leave pharmaceutical
`residue in the meat.
`12. Whole Foods never disclosed to Ms. Safari that the cattle used in its Beef
`Products may be raised with antibiotics or that it does not take the necessary steps to
`ensure that all Beef Products it sells are antibiotic-free.
`13. Had Ms. Safari known that cattle used in Whole Foods Beef Products were
`raised with antibiotics, she would not have purchased the Products or would not have
`paid what she did for them.
`
`Peymon Khaghani
`14. Plaintiff Peymon Khaghani is a citizen and resident of Tustin, California.
`15. Since approximately 2010 and within the applicable limitations period, Mr.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 4
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 5 of 43 Page ID #:5
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Khaghani has purchased Beef Products at Whole Foods on numerous occasions. He
`mostly recently purchased Beef Products from Whole Foods in or around June 2022.
`16. Mr. Khaghani purchased the Products at Whole Foods’ retail stores,
`including its store located at 2847 Park Avenue in Tustin, California.
`17. Mr. Khaghani saw and relied on Whole Foods representations concerning
`its Beef Products in-store, on its website, in its listings on Amazon, in emails from
`Whole Foods, and on the Products’ packaging. Mr. Khaghani saw and relied on Whole
`Foods’ “No Antibiotics, Ever” and “No antibiotics or added growth hormones, ever”
`slogans prior to purchasing the Beef Products..
`18. Mr. Khaghani purchased the Beef Products at a premium price because,
`based on Whole Foods’ representations, he believed all Whole Foods Beef Products
`derived from cattle raised without antibiotics or pharmaceuticals. Choosing antibiotic-
`free meat is important to Mr. Khaghani because he does not want to fund or support a
`farming model that uses pharmaceuticals as part of raising the animals in crowded,
`unsanitary conditions. Mr. Khaghani also does not want to fund or support this farming
`model because it contributes to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and may leave
`pharmaceutical residue in the meat.
`19. Whole Foods never disclosed to Mr. Khaghani that the cattle used in its
`Beef Products may be raised with antibiotics or that it does not take the necessary steps
`to ensure that all Beef Products it sells are antibiotic-free.
`20. Had Mr. Khaghani known that cattle used in Whole Foods Beef Products
`were raised with antibiotics, he would not have purchased the Products or would not
`have paid what he did for them.
`
`Jason Rose
`21. Plaintiff Jason Rose is a citizen and resident of Moorpark, California.
`22. Since 2005 and within the applicable limitations period, Mr. Rose has
`purchased Beef Products at Whole Foods on numerous occasions. He most recently
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 5
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 6 of 43 Page ID #:6
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`purchased Beef Products from Whole Foods in or around June 2022.
`23. Mr. Rose purchased the Products at Whole Foods’ retail stores, including its
`store located at 740 N. Moorpark Road in Thousand Oaks, California.
`24. Mr. Rose saw and relied on Whole Foods representations concerning its
`Beef Products in-store and on the Products’ packaging. Mr. Rose saw and relied on
`Whole Foods’ “No Antibiotics, Ever” slogan prior to purchasing the Beef Products.
`25. Mr. Rose purchased the Beef Products at a premium price because, based
`on Whole Foods’ representations, he believed all Whole Foods Beef Products derived
`from cattle raised without antibiotics or pharmaceuticals. Choosing antibiotic-free meat
`is important to Mr. Rose because he does not want to fund or support a farming model
`that uses pharmaceuticals as part of raising the animals in crowded, unsanitary
`conditions. Mr. Rose also does not want to fund or support this farming model because it
`contributes to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and may leave pharmaceutical
`residue in the meat.
`26. Whole Foods never disclosed to Mr. Rose that the cattle used in its Beef
`Products are raised with antibiotics or that it does not take the necessary steps to ensure
`that all Beef Products it sells are antibiotic-free.
`27. Had Mr. Rose known that cattle used in Whole Foods Beef Products were
`raised with antibiotics, he would not have purchased the Products or would not have
`paid what he did for them.
`
`Farm Forward
`28. Plaintiff Farm Forward is a national public interest animal protection
`organization founded in 2007 and recognized by the IRS as a § 501(c)(3) tax-exempt
`entity. Farm Forward’s principal place of business is in Portland, Oregon. It has more
`than 60,000 supporters across the world, with over 33,000 followers on social media.
`29. Farm Forward’s mission is to end factory farming. It has approximately 75
`to 150 supporters and followers in Orange County.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 6
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 7 of 43 Page ID #:7
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`B. Defendant
`30. Defendant Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a corporation organized and
`existing under the laws of the state of Texas. Its principal place of business and
`headquarters is maintained at 550 Bowie Street, in Austin, Texas.
`31. Whole Foods sells the Products in its retail stores throughout California.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`32. This Court has jurisdiction over this lawsuit under the Class Action Fairness
`Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because this is a proposed class action in which: (1) there are at
`least 100 class members; (2) the combined claims of class members exceed $5,000,000,
`exclusive of interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs; and (3) Plaintiffs and Defendant Whole
`Foods are domiciled in different states.
`33. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Whole Foods because the relevant
`transactions with Whole Foods giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in California,
`and Whole Foods has sufficient minimum contacts in California to render the exercise of
`jurisdiction by this Court proper. Additionally, the representations and omissions at issue
`were directed to California residents. Many of the relevant representations and
`omissions—and the transactions made based on those representations and omissions—
`occurred in Whole Foods’ California stores, were made directly to California residents
`via online marketing, and involved Beef Products purchases in California.
`34. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a
`substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this
`District.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`A. Consumer Demand for Antibiotic-Free Meat
`35.
`In recent years, transparency about animal welfare and the administration of
`antibiotics to animals has become increasingly important to meat consumers. According
`to a 2018 study by the Food Marketing Institute, “‘[r]aised in the U.S.’ and ‘antibiotic-
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 7
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 8 of 43 Page ID #:8
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`free’ are the two most requested items for expanded assortment at the primary meat
`store.”3 The same study found that, at the same time that conventional meat sales had
`decreased, “meat with special production claims, such as organic, grass-fed or antibiotic-
`free, had dollar gains of 25.9 percent and volume growth of 38.3 percent over 2017.4
`Nearly two-thirds of shoppers who have seen a claim of “antibiotic-free,” “hormone-
`free” or “humanely-raised” are more likely to buy the advertised item instead of a
`conventional counterpart.5
`36. The use of antibiotics in animal farming contributes to the development of
`antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can infect humans.6 Infection can occur in several
`ways,7 but most relevant here, it can happen by consuming or handling meat.8 Giving
`animals antibiotics contributes to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. People
`then ingest the bacteria along with the meat, and the bacteria can cause infections. Many
`of these infections cannot be effectively treated with existing antibiotics because the
`
`
`3 Power of Meat, Food Marketing Institute, 2018, at 5.
`4 Id.
`5 Id. at 5, 48.
`6 See Antibiotic Resistance: Understanding the Connection to Antibiotic Use In Animals
`Raised for Food, Mayoclinic.org, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-
`conditions/infectious-diseases/in-depth/antibiotic-resistance/art-
`20135516#:~:text=cause%20untreatable%20infections.-
`,Antibiotic%20resistance%3A%20Understanding%20the%20connection%20to%20antib
`iotic%20use%20in%20animals,These%20may%20cause%20untreatable%20infections
`(last visited Aug. 9, 2022); Christy Manyi-Loh et al., Antibiotic Use in Agriculture and
`Its Consequential Resistance in Environmental Sources: Potential Public Health
`Implications, 233 Molecules 795, 796 (2018), available at
`https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6017557/.
`7 Gill, supra note 1, at 36 (noting antibiotic-resistant bacteria can also spread through the
`air, water, insects, farmworkers, and soil).
`8 Vangelis Economou, & Panagiota Gousia, Agriculture and Food Animals as a Source
`of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria, 8 Infect Drug Resist 49-61 (2015), available at
`https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4388096/.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 8
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 9 of 43 Page ID #:9
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`bacteria are already antibiotic-resistant.9
`37. The use of antibiotics is also indicative of animal mistreatment. As Farm
`Forward has noted elsewhere, “[d]ue to their poor genetic health and the crowded
`conditions in which they’re confined, animals on factory farms are often given drugs in
`subtherapeutic doses to promote growth and keep them alive in conditions that would
`otherwise stunt their growth and even kill them.”10 Therefore, the use of antibiotics in
`meat goes hand-in-hand with poor animal welfare standards. And animal welfare, too, is
`of increasing importance to meat consumers. According to a 2017 Hartman’s Group
`survey, 71% of respondents agreed that “when making purchasing decisions, it’s
`important the company avoids inhumane treatment of animals,” and one of the top
`animal welfare practices that increase the likelihood of purchases is that the “animals
`[are] not given antibiotics/hormones.”11 In 2018, another survey found that “[t]hree-
`fourths of consumers say that they would be likely to switch to meat, eggs and dairy
`products with labels that guarantee that the products came from farm animals who were
`raised according to higher animal welfare standards. This finding extends across
`demographics, including gender, age, and race.”12 In 2020, a public opinion poll found
`
`
`
`9 Stahl, supra note 2.
`10 Ben Goldsmith, The Drugs Farm Forward Found Hiding in Your Meat, Farm Forward
`(April 13, 2022), https://www.farmforward.com/#!/blog?blogid=the-drugs-farm-
`forward-found-hiding-in-your-meat; see also Stacy Sneeringer et al., Economics of
`Antibiotic Use in U.S. Livestock Production 31–36 (2015), available at
`https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45485/err-200.pdf?v=0.
`11 Ginger Schleuter, 2017 Study Finds Consumer Familiarity With Sustainability
`Reached All-Time High, Natural Products Insider,
`https://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/sustainability/2017-study-finds-consumer-
`familiarity-sustainability-reached-all-time-high (last visited Aug. 3, 2022).
`12 Lake Research Partners, Results from a Survey of American Consumers, ASPCA,
`https://www.aspca.org/sites/default/files/aspca-
`2018_animal_welfare_labelling_and_consumer_concern_survey.pdf (last visited Aug. 9,
`2022).
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 9
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 10 of 43 Page ID #:10
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`that “[t]he vast majority (89%) of Americans are concerned about industrial animal
`agriculture, citing animal welfare, worker safety or public health risks as a concern.”13
`38. Buying antibiotic-free meat and meat derived from appropriately treated
`animals is sufficiently important to American consumers that they are willing to pay a
`premium price for it. One study, for example, concluded that the price premium is 20%
`or more for meat raised without antibiotics than conventional counterparts.14
`39. Beginning in 2002, Whole Foods launched a promotional campaign
`marketing its beef as having “No Antibiotics, Ever.”15 The reality is starkly different:
`Whole Foods sold Beef Products without taking effective measures to ensure that they
`came from cattle raised without antibiotics.16
`B. Whole Foods’ Beef Products
`40. Whole Foods’ Beef Products—all of which are marketed with the prominent
`slogans “[n]o antibiotics or added growth hormones, ever” or “No Antibiotics, Ever”—
`include, but are not limited to, the following:17
`•
`Beef Ribeye Steak
`•
`Boneless Beef New York Strip Steak
`
`
`13 Email from Bob Meadow & Meryl O’Bryan, Lake Rsch. Partners (Feb. 1, 2019),
`available at
`https://www.aspca.org/sites/default/files/impact_on_public_attitudes_toward_industrial_
`animal_agriculture-final-111120.pdf.
`14 Lance Price et al., Policy Reforms for Antibiotic Use Claims In Livestock, 376 Science
`130 (Supp. 2022), available at https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abj1823.
`15 See Whole Foods Market Quality Standards: Select Milestones, Whole Foods Market,
`https://d39w7f4ix9f5s9.cloudfront.net/ea/2d/171463694419b8abc050017e4255/wfm-
`timeline-4.pdf (last visited July 12, 2022).
`16 See Andrew deCoriolis, Farm Forward Finds Drugs in Certified Meat at Whole
`Foods, Farm Forward (Apr. 4, 2022), https://www.farmforward.com/#!/blog/farm-
`forward-finds-drugs-in-certified-meat-at-whole-foods/farm-forward.
`17 See Beef, Whole Foods Market,
`https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/products/meat/beef, (last visited July 12, 2022).
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 10
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 11 of 43 Page ID #:11
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`Beef Tenderloin Steak (Filet Mignon)
`Ground Beef 90% Lean / 10% Fat
`Boneless Beef Chuck Roast
`Ground Beef 80% Lean / 20% Fat
`Beef Top Sirloin Steak
`Lean Beef Chuck Stew Meat
`Bone-In Beef Short Ribs
`Boneless Ribeye Steak
`Organic Ground Beef 85% Lean / 15% Fat
`Beef Flank Steak
`Organic Boneless Beef Ribeye Steak
`Beef Sirloin Flap Steak
`Beef Tri Tip Roast
`Bone In Flanken Style Beef Short Ribs
`Beef Porterhouse Steak
`Packaged Sliced Lunchmeat, Bologna – Beef Uncured
`Plain Roast Beef
`Bone-In Beef Ribeye Steak
`Organic Beef Bones
`Boneless Beef Chuck Steak
`Eel River Organic Ground Beef 85% Lean/15% Fat
`Country Natural Beef Ground Beef
`Eel River Organic Beef Organic Grass-fed Ground Beef 93/7
`Country Natural Beef Ground Beef 80% Lean/ 20% Fat
`Honest Dogs with Pasture-Raised Beef
`Herb Crusted Roast Beef
`Rao’s Meatballs & Sauce
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 11
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 12 of 43 Page ID #:12
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`•
`•
`
`Eel River Organic Beef Ribeye Steak Bnls Retail Grs Organic S4
`365 by Whole Foods Market Packaged Sliced Lunchmeat, Bologna –
`Beef Uncured
`•
`Beef Oxtail
`•
`365 by Whole Foods Market Sliced Roast Beef
`•
`Diestel Turkey Ranch Beef Pastrami
`•
`Diestel Turkey Ranch Seasoned Uncured Beef Pastrami
`• Wellshire Farms Beef Bologna
`•
`Diestel Turkey Ranch Roast Beef
`• Wild Planet Organic No Salt Added Shredded Beef Pouch
`•
`Organic Meat Co. Organic Burgers
`•
`Country Natural Beef Ground Beef 90% Lean / 10% Fat
`•
`Applegate Organics the Great Organic Uncured Beef Hot Dog
`•
`Panorama Organic Grass-Fed & Finished Ground Beef
`41. Whole Foods sells and has sold, during the applicable statute of limitations,
`its Beef Products in California. The Products are available for purchase at Whole Foods
`stores in California and in most other states.
`42. Whole Foods markets and advertises its Products in California and
`nationwide. It reaches consumers through, among other marketing channels, in-store
`signage, television advertising, print advertising, email marketing, and online marketing
`including on Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Amazon Prime, and its own website
`and blog.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 12
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 13 of 43 Page ID #:13
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`C. Whole Foods’ “No Antibiotics, Ever” Advertising Misleadingly
`Communicates That Its Beef Products Come from Cattle Raised
`Without Antibiotics or Other Pharmaceuticals
`43. Whole Foods has had a formal policy of “[n]o antibiotics ever and animal
`welfare standards in [its] meat department” since 2002. 18 Since 1981, no “antibiotics
`[were] allowed for [its] meat department.”19
`44. Whole Foods promotes “No Antibiotics, Ever” through a widespread
`campaign in stores and online shopping outlets, as well as on its website, blog,
`packaging, and online and television advertisements. “No Antibiotics, Ever” is
`prominently displayed in Whole Foods stores throughout California. “No Antibiotics,
`Ever” appears, for example, on in-store signage above or near Whole Foods meat
`departments as well as on the packaging for certain Products and napkins given out to
`customers:
`
`
`18 See Whole Foods Market Quality Standards: Select Milestones, supra note 15.
`19 See id.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 13
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 14 of 43 Page ID #:14
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`45. A similar slogan appears on Whole Foods’ Amazon listings. As shown
`below, next to each Beef Product on the Amazon website, the prospective purchaser
`sees: “No added growth hormones or antibiotics, ever.”
`
`46. Similarly, on its own website, Whole Foods states that a “baseline
`standard[]” for the meat it sells is “[n]o antibiotics ever. If an animal needs antibiotic
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 14
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 15 of 43 Page ID #:15
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`treatment, it is separated from those bought by [its] meat department.”20
`47. On its blog, Whole Foods promotes “No Antibiotics, Ever” in its meat with
`posts entitled, for instance, “Our Meat: No Antibiotics Ever[,]” “Our Meat: No
`Antibiotics, Ever[,]” “What Makes Our Meat Different[,]” and “Whole Foods Market:
`no antibiotics in meat departments[.]”21 These blog posts specifically mention Whole
`Foods’ Beef Products. For example, the “Our Meat: No Antibiotics Ever” post depicts
`cattle underneath the emphatic caption, “At Whole Foods Market: No Antibiotics EVER
`is our standard[,]” and proceeds to tout “the best-tasting beef, pork and poultry you’ll
`find in a grocery store and no antibiotics, EVER!”22
`
`
`
`20 See Meat Department Quality Standards, Whole Foods Market,
`https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/quality-standards/meat-standards, (last visited July
`12, 2022).
`21 See A.C. Gallo, Our Meat: No Antibiotics, Ever, Whole Foods Market (Jun. 25, 2012),
`https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/tips-and-ideas/archive/our-meat-no-antibiotics-
`ever-0; Liz Fry, Our Meat: No Antibiotics, Ever, Whole Foods Market (Apr. 29, 2015),
`https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/tips-and-ideas/archive/our-meat-no-antibiotics-
`ever; Theo Weening, What Makes Our Meat Different, Whole Foods Market (Feb. 10,
`2011), https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/tips-and-ideas/archive/what-makes-our-
`meat-different; Whole Foods Market: no antibiotics in meat departments, Whole Foods
`Market (Apr. 18, 2011), https://media.wholefoodsmarket.com/whole-foods-market-no-
`antibiotics-in-meat-departments.
`22 See Gallo, supra note 21 (emphasis in original).
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 15
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 16 of 43 Page ID #:16
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`48. Whole Foods’ “No Antibiotics, Ever” promotional campaign also appears
`in television and online video advertisements. For instance, in one television
`advertisement, Whole Foods prominently displays imagery of beef and cattle and its “No
`Antibiotics, Ever” slogan, while the viewer hears a rhyming slogan: “[a]t Whole Foods
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 16
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 17 of 43 Page ID #:17
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Market, we raise our meat right with show-stopping taste in every bite.”23
`
`
`49. Whole Foods’ dissemination of “No Antibiotics, Ever” and related
`advertisements gives reasonable consumers the false impression that the Beef Products
`were raised without antibiotics.
`50. Consumers understand antibiotic-free labeling to mean that the cattle used
`in the meat were raised without antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals. In a 2018
`Consumer Reports study of 1,014 Americans, “when given a list of criteria for a label
`claim referencing ‘no antibiotics’ on meat or poultry,” over three-quarters said “no
`antibiotics” should mean “no antibiotics were administered to a healthy animal” and
`two-thirds said it should mean “no antibiotics were administered to the animal under any
`circumstances.”24
`
`
`23 Whole Foods Market TV Spot, ‘Where it Starts,’ ispot.tv (Aug. 17, 2020),
`https://www.ispot.tv/ad/nxX8/whole-foods-market-where-it-starts.
`24 Consumer Reports Survey Group, Natural and Antibiotics Labels Survey 8 (2018),
`available at https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-
`Natural-and-Antibiotics-Labels-Survey-Public-Report-1.pdf.
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 17
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 18 of 43 Page ID #:18
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`D. Whole Foods’ “Animal Welfare Certified” Representation on Beef
`Product Packaging Reinforces Its “No Antibiotics, Ever” Promotional
`Campaign
`51. Whole Foods also represents that its Beef Products are “Animal Welfare
`Certified” on the Products themselves, as at the bottom of the following ribeye steak
`label:25
`
`52.
`“Animal welfare certified” is a label developed by the Global Animal
`Partnership (“GAP”), a standards-setting group for farmed animals. While GAP
`recognizes different tiers of certification,26 any GAP certification is supposed to mean
`the animals were “raised without the use of antibiotics[.]”27 Given this standard and the
`common understanding of “animal welfare,” Whole Foods’ “Animal Welfare Certified”
`
`
`25 Meat Department Quality Standards, supra note 20.
`26 See id.
`27 See Global Animal Partnership Homepage, https://globalanimalpartnership.org/ (last
`visited July 12, 2022).
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT – 18
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-01562-JWH-KES Document 1 Filed 08/23/22 Page 19 of 43 Page ID #:19
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`label reinforces to reasonable consumers that the Beef Product was raised with higher
`animal welfare standards, without antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals.
`53.
`In approximately 2007, Whole Foods’ CEO formed GAP. Farm Forward’s
`Board Chair28 joined GAP’s founding Board of Directors, and Farm Forward
`representatives continued to serve on GAP’s Board until 2020. During that decade, Farm
`Forward worked with GAP, and by extension Whole Foods, in an effort to improve
`animal welfare standards through multi-level standards development, standards
`application, and standards verification across the meat supply chain.
`54. Whole Foods was integral to creating GAP and its standards: Whole Foods
`employees provided staff support to GAP, and Whole Foods employees served on
`GAP’s Board. Whole Foods thus influenced the GAP standards that would be used to
`certify meat sold by Whole Foods. Whole Foods maintains close control over GAP to
`this day: GAP’s executive director is Whole Foods’ Executive Leader of Meat and
`Poultry.
`55. GAP developed a six-tier rating system (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 5+ ratings), with a
`“1” rating denoting “No Cages, No Crates, No Crowding” and each step up from there
`denoting additional animal welfare measures. Products certified to meet GAP standards
`are often marketed as “Animal Welfare Certified”—bra

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket