throbber

`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 1 of 36
`
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825)
`ddurie@durietangri.com
`EUGENE NOVIKOV (SBN 257849)
`enovikov@durietangri.com
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-362-6666
`Facsimile: 415-236-6300
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and CHRISTIAN LEUTENEGGER
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`Case No.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`
`
`ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and
`CHRISTIAN LEUTENEGGER,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 2 of 36
`
`Plaintiffs Antech Diagnostics, Inc. (“Antech”) and Christian Leutenegger (“Dr. Leutenegger”)
`(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), for their Complaint against Defendant IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (“IDEXX”),
`allege as follows:
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`1.
`Plaintiffs Antech Diagnostics (“Antech”) and Dr. Christian Leutenegger bring this case to
`protect Dr. Leutenegger’s right to earn a living in his field.
`2.
`Dr. Leutenegger has spent the entirety of his career—over twenty-five years—as a
`veterinary scientist specializing in molecular diagnostics, and specifically in the use and development of
`quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests, also known as “qPCR” or “real-time PCR.” The primary
`use of a qPCR test in veterinary medicine is to detect and measure the presence of infectious pathogens
`in animals. qPCR tests can also be used to identify other information, for example, animal parentage or
`the presence of genes that can cause heritable diseases. Today, qPCR tests are commonplace in
`veterinary science.
`3.
`Dr. Leutenegger helped pioneer the use of qPCR tests for diagnostic purposes in
`veterinary medicine. His doctoral research—performed in the 1990s—involved the earliest versions of
`qPCR tests for Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV). After receiving his PhD in 1998, Dr. Leutenegger
`joined University of California, Davis School of Veterinary Medicine for his postdoctoral work. By the
`end of 1999, he helped create the Real-Time PCR Research and Diagnostics Core Facility. Over the next
`nearly seven years, he designed and validated more than 1,500 qPCR tests for research and diagnostic
`applications. He then joined Defendant IDEXX Laboratories (“IDEXX”) in West Sacramento,
`California, where he continued his work designing and validating qPCR tests for veterinary use. After 13
`years at IDEXX, Dr. Leutenegger resigned in 2019 and joined Antech in Fountain Valley, California.
`4.
`It is this last career move that IDEXX now tries to obstruct. After learning of Dr.
`Leutenegger’s employment at Antech, IDEXX sent a series of letters threatening litigation against both
`Plaintiffs for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets and against Dr. Leutenegger for breach of
`contract. But IDEXX has no basis to do so.
`5.
`IDEXX’s threats boil down to the fact that Antech launched a new qPCR panel for
`ringworm—the FastPanel® Ringworm PCR—in September 2020, after Dr. Leutenegger came on board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 3 of 36
`
`IDEXX points to the release of the FastPanel® Ringworm PCR to insinuate that Antech and/or Dr.
`Leutenegger may have misappropriated its trade secret information. But IDEXX’s letters fail to identify
`with any specificity any confidential material Dr. Leutenegger supposedly took or used. Instead,
`IDEXX’s letters identify as “trade secrets” standardized and public aspects of the qPCR process that are
`routinely used in the field of veterinary science and cite to materials that IDEXX itself published in an
`academic journal.
`6.
`Both Dr. Leutenegger and Antech repeatedly assured IDEXX that Dr. Leutenegger has not
`disclosed any proprietary information, and that both Plaintiffs implemented additional safeguards to
`protect against even inadvertent disclosure. But IDEXX continues to insist, without basis, that Dr.
`Leutenegger either has misappropriated or will misappropriate trade secrets simply by virtue of his
`employment at Antech.
`7.
`IDEXX also threatens to pursue breach of contract claims against Dr. Leutenegger,
`asserting that Dr. Leutenegger’s employment at Antech violates the non-competition and non-disclosure
`clauses in his employment contract with IDEXX. But IDEXX’s efforts to enforce the non-competition
`clause contravene California law, which staunchly protects an employee’s right to mobility. California’s
`policy against employee non-competition clauses must apply to any claim brought by IDEXX against Dr.
`Leutenegger: Dr. Leutenegger has worked in California—and only California—since 1999. Indeed,
`IDEXX itself employed Dr. Leutenegger along with numerous other employees in California at an
`IDEXX laboratory in West Sacramento for thirteen years. And any claim of breach of the non-disclosure
`clause fails for the same reason as does IDEXX’s trade secret claim: Dr. Leutenegger has not disclosed
`or used any IDEXX confidential information in his role at Antech, and the information IDEXX takes
`issue with in its letters is and has been public.
`8.
`California law does not allow IDEXX to use threatened litigation as a sword to bar Dr.
`Leutenegger—a former and current California employee—from earning a living in his field of expertise.
`Dr. Leutenegger has spent his entire career in the field of veterinary diagnostics. Long before he began
`his work with IDEXX, he developed thousands of qPCR tests at the University of Zurich and the
`University of California, Davis, advancing the field from his role at one of the most prominent and
`prestigious veterinary programs in the country. He now seeks to continue his life’s work at Antech—and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 4 of 36
`
`Antech seeks to continue its business operations—without the specter of litigation.
`9.
`Plaintiffs thus file this lawsuit to clarify their rights. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Dr.
`Leutenegger and Antech have not misappropriated or threatened misappropriation of any trade secrets
`under either the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) or the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act
`(“CUTSA”). Dr. Leutenegger further seeks a declaration that the non-competition clause in his
`employment contract with IDEXX is unenforceable, and that the non-disclosure clause in his
`employment contract with IDEXX has not been breached.
`THE PARTIES
`10.
`Plaintiff Antech Diagnostics, Inc. is a subsidiary of VCA, Inc. Antech is a corporation
`organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, having its principal place of business at
`17620 Mount Hermann St., Fountain Valley, CA 92708. Antech has been a leader in veterinary
`diagnostics in the United States and Canada for nearly thirty years.
`11.
`Plaintiff Dr. Christian Leutenegger is a resident of California. He has continuously lived
`and worked as a veterinary scientist in California since 1999.
`12.
`Upon information and belief, Defendant IDEXX is a corporation incorporated in
`Delaware with a principal place of business at One IDEXX Drive, Westbrook, ME 04092. IDEXX
`employed Dr. Leutenegger from 2006 until March 2019 at its laboratory at 2825 Kovr Dr., West
`Sacramento, CA 95605. Upon information and belief, IDEXX employs approximately 250 veterinarians
`and technicians at its West Sacramento laboratory, which is the only laboratory in which IDEXX
`performs qPCR testing.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`13.
`This is an action for declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 regarding trade
`secret disputes arising from Dr. Leutenegger’s employment with Defendant IDEXX followed by his
`subsequent employment with Plaintiff Antech, and contract disputes arising from non-competition and
`non-disclosure clauses signed by Dr. Leutenegger as a condition of his employment with Defendant
`IDEXX.
`///
`///
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 5 of 36
`
`JURISDICTION, VENUE & INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
`14.
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Antech’s claims for declaratory relief
`relating to IDEXX’s federal trade secret claims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1836, et seq., 28 U.S.C. § 1331,
`and 28 U.S.C. §2201. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Antech’s claims for declaratory
`relief relating to IDEXX’s state law claims as detailed in this Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
`15.
`A substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims alleged in this
`Complaint occurred in this Judicial District. Dr. Leutenegger has resided in California both before and
`throughout his employment with IDEXX and Antech. The contract and trade secret claims arise from Dr.
`Leutenegger’s employment with IDEXX in West Sacramento, California. Upon information and belief,
`IDEXX employed approximately 250 employees at its reference laboratory in West Sacramento
`throughout the time it employed Dr. Leutenegger there. Upon information and belief, IDEXX has
`operated that laboratory in West Sacramento since at least 2006, and continues to do so to this day. The
`technology IDEXX contends is confidential and proprietary was developed at that facility, and upon
`information and belief is still used and kept at that facility. The Court has personal jurisdiction over
`IDEXX, and IDEXX resides in this District for venue purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(2).
`Venue lies in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`§ 1391(b)(1)–(2).
`16.
`A substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims alleged in this Complaint
`occurred in the City and County of Sacramento. For purposes of intradistrict assignment under Civil
`Local Rule 120 and Appendix A, this Intellectual Property Rights action will be assigned on a district-
`wide basis.
`
`A.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`Dr. Leutenegger’s work at Antech builds on his lengthy career in the field of
`veterinary molecular diagnostics.
`
`17.
`The mere fact that Dr. Leutenegger now develops real-time PCR tests for Antech does not
`constitute evidence of misappropriation of IDEXX’s proprietary information. Rather, Dr. Leutenegger
`has worked in the research and design of qPCR tests for nearly as long as they have been in existence,
`and he began his work relating to ringworm qPCR tests well before he joined IDEXX.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 6 of 36
`
`18.
`Dr. Leutenegger’s work in real-time PCR test development at Antech continues the work
`he has done since 1995, when he began his Ph.D. in molecular virology and immunology at the
`Department for Internal Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zurich. There, Dr. Leutenegger
`researched a method of using one of the earliest real-time PCR tests to detect feline immunodeficiency
`virus (FIV), a disease similar to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 1
`19.
`After receiving his PhD in 1998, Dr. Leutenegger joined the University of California,
`Davis School of Veterinary Medicine (“UC Davis”) for his post-doctoral studies. By the end of 1999, he
`had helped to implement UC Davis’s new Real-time PCR Research and Diagnostics Core Facility, which
`he directed for the next seven years. There, he created novel DNA services for real-time PCR testing for
`researchers and clinicians. Leading a team of nine technicians, Dr. Leutenegger designed and validated
`more than 1,500 tests, and was included on more than 50 peer-reviewed publications relating to qPCR
`testing in animals, humans, and plants.
`20.
`It was at UC Davis that Dr. Leutenegger first engaged with real-time PCR testing in
`animals for ringworm. As early as 2002 or 2003, Dr. Leutenegger conceived of a real-time PCR
`ringworm panel. But at that time, not enough was known about the genetic make-up of a common
`ringworm strain—Trichophyton mentagrophytes—to design an accurate real-time PCR test.
`21.
`Dr. Leutenegger remained at UC Davis for seven years. He then joined IDEXX in 2006
`as the Director of Molecular Diagnostics at IDEXX’s laboratory in West Sacramento, California. Upon
`joining IDEXX, Dr. Leutenegger signed agreements containing the clauses at issue in this action. Dr.
`Leutenegger was not represented by counsel when he signed his employment agreement with IDEXX.
`During his time at IDEXX, including in 2017 and 2018, Dr. Leutenegger received annual 3% raises to his
`salary.
`22.
`At IDEXX, Dr. Leutenegger’s work focused on validating and scaling up certain qPCR
`tests. Much of this work built on Dr. Leutenegger’s earlier research at UC Davis described in paragraphs
`19–20, supra, and on information in the public domain.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Christian Leutenegger et. al, Rapid feline immunodeficiency virus provirus quantitation by polymerase
`chain reaction using the TaqMan® fluorogenic real-time detection system, J. of Virological Methods 78,
`105–116 (1999).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 7 of 36
`
`23.
`Around 2010, the genetic sequence data for ringworm Dr. Leutenegger needed to
`complete his qPCR panel design became publicly available in NCBI GenBank, a database widely used in
`the industry. Dr. Leutenegger used this new genetic sequence data to complete the ringworm panel he
`conceived years earlier at UC Davis. IDEXX publicized Dr. Leutenegger’s research and findings.2
`24.
`In September 2014, IDEXX announced the launch of the Ringworm RealPCRTM Panel,
`which Dr. Leutenegger designed.3
`B.
`IDEXX began threatening Dr. Leutenegger and Antech with litigation almost
`immediately after Dr. Leutenegger commenced his new employment.
`
`25.
`Dr. Leutenegger joined Antech in March 2019. As Antech’s Director of Molecular
`Diagnostics, Dr. Leutenegger develops diagnostic tests that detect a wide range of infectious diseases and
`other harmful pathogens in animals. As one example, Dr. Leutenegger recently helped to develop a
`SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR test to detect the first two cases of Covid-19 in cats from New York. Dr.
`Leutenegger also helped to develop a new real-time PCR panel to detect several strains of ringworm in
`animals.
`26.
`Shortly after Dr. Leutenegger’s departure from IDEXX, IDEXX began sending a series of
`letters to both Dr. Leutenegger and Antech claiming that Dr. Leutenegger had breached his prior
`employment contract with IDEXX and misappropriated “trade secrets.” But IDEXX failed to
`substantiate its claim that any misappropriation or improper disclosure took place, and instead identified
`the following as its proprietary “trade secrets”:
`a.
`“development of Quantitative Leishmania, Equine Diarrhea, FIV, FIPv,
`Ringworm, canine influenza and Respiratory tests;” Ex. 1 at 1.
`b.
` “reverse transcription, amplification and detection;” id.
`c.
`“the IDEXX methodology of operating RealPCRs within a single set of conditions
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Karen A. Moriello and Christian M. Leutenegger, Use of a commercial qPCR assay in 52 high risk
`shelter cats for disease identification of dermatophytosis and mycological cure, Veterinary Dermatology
`29(1), 66–e26 (2018); Linda S. Jacobson et. al, Comparison of real-time PCR with fungal culture for the
`diagnosis of Microsporum canis dermatophytosis in shelter cats: a field study, J. of Feline Medicine and
`Surgery, 20(2), 103–107 (2018).
`3 IDEXX Laboratories Announces Two New Innovative Tests to Aid Veterinarians in the Diagnosis and
`Management of Itchy Pets, IDEXX Website (Sep. 8, 2014), https://www.idexx.com/en/about-
`idexx/news/newsroom-archive/idexx-announces-two-new-innovative-tests-itchy-patients/.
`
`6
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 8 of 36
`
`for extraction;” id.
`d.
`
`service;” id.
`
`“the cost position and internal cost structure of every IDEXX product and
`
`e.
`
`“the pricing and product positioning strategy of all related IDEXX products and
`
`services;” id.
`
`f.
`“information about the most attractive disease franchises for new menu
`development and IDEXX’s strategies for competing with them;” id.
`g.
`“IDEXX’s genetic testing strategy;” id. and;
`h.
`“the value and strategic focus on decentralization and IDEXX’s new product focus
`areas (including but not limited to antibiotic resistance testing, demodex and UTI) and service
`development pipeline.” Id.
`C.
`Dr. Leutenegger and Antech provided IDEXX with multiple written assurances that
`he has not disclosed IDEXX’s proprietary information.
`
`27.
`In a response to IDEXX’s first letter, Dr. Leutenegger assured IDEXX that he did not and
`would not disclose or use any trade secrets or proprietary information owned by IDEXX in his work with
`Antech:
`
`I assured IDEXX in my resignation letter that I would not disclose any
`confidential business information and/or trade secrets belonging to IDEXX
`and am hereby reaffirming this position. My new position as Director of
`Molecular Diagnostics for Antech Diagnostics does not require or cause
`me to use any sensitive, proprietary information belonging to IDEXX. In
`fact, both Antech and I have taken extra precautions to ensure that I do not
`disclose IDEXX’s trade secrets or confidential business information,
`including but not limited to having me sign a statement prior to the
`commencement of employment affirming that I would not disclose any
`such information to Antech. (Please see attached).
`
`Ex. 2 at 1.
`28.
`Dr. Leutenegger even provided IDEXX with an affidavit, signed under the penalty of
`perjury on July 31, 2020, stating:
`On or about September 26, 2006, I executed an Invention and Non-
`Disclosure Agreement with IDEXX (the “Agreement”). I recognize my
`obligations and responsibilities to IDEXX as set forth in the Agreement
`and I agree to abide by the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement
`that are legally enforceable and remain in effect.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 9 of 36
`
`I recognize and acknowledge that, in my role with IDEXX, I was allowed
`access to, and was involved in developing, certain of IDEXX’s proprietary
`and trade secret information. In particular, I recognize that the specific
`primer, probe, synthetic positive controls and re-sequencing primer
`sequence information of all real-time PCR tests I developed are
`confidential, proprietary information belonging to IDEXX (“IDEXX
`Proprietary Information”). I also recognize that IDEXX has asserted that
`its market-based analyses of such tests and products and its planned release
`and marketing strategies and initiatives and platforms relating thereto are
`IDEXX Proprietary Information. Since I have left IDEXX’s employ, I
`have not used or disclosed, nor has it ever been my intention to use or
`disclose, or to assist others to use or disclose, any IDEXX Proprietary
`Information or trade secrets—including in my capacity as an employee of
`Antech Diagnostics.
`I am not in possession of any IDEXX equipment, including any IDEXX
`thumb drives, and I have returned all such equipment to IDEXX.
`Ex. 3 ¶¶ 4–5, 7.
`29.
` Antech also provided IDEXX with its own affirmations that Dr. Leutenegger’s
`employment with Antech would not involve the disclosure or use of any trade secrets or confidential
`information owned by IDEXX, stating:
`I am Vice President and Co-General Counsel for Antech Diagnostics Inc. .
`. . Dr. Leutenegger has affirmed in writing that he has not and shall not use
`IDEXX’s confidential information or trade secrets in his role at Antech.
`Antech shares this same position. Dr. Leutenegger has also reviewed with
`me in detail that information IDEXX alleges is proprietary is already in the
`public domain.
`
`Ex. 4 at 1; see also Ex. 5 at 3 (“To the best of my knowledge and belief, Antech has not induced and
`shall not induce or encourage Dr. Leutenegger to violate the promises and covenants set forth in the
`Agreement”); Ex. 6 at 3.
`30.
`Despite these assurances, when Antech announced its FastPanel® Ringworm PCR test on
`September 17, 2020, IDEXX again threatened Antech and Dr. Leutenegger with litigation. Ex. 5. In that
`letter, IDEXX alleged that the Antech FastPanel® Ringworm PCR “create[d], at a minimum, the
`suspicion that Antech has misappropriated and used IDEXX’s confidential/proprietary information
`and/or trade secrets, and is now using that information at Antech.” Id. at 1. As support for its accusation,
`IDEXX stated that Dr. Leutenegger “was integral to the design and implementation of the IDEXX
`RealPCR system, a novel approach to PCR testing that optimizes tests to a standard set of lab protocols
`(versus optimizing protocols to each individual test),” and that he played a “critical role” in the research
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 10 of 36
`
`and development of IDEXX’s testing portfolio including the ringworm qPCR panel that IDEXX
`launched six years earlier, in 2014. Id.
`31.
`In response, Antech again reassured IDEXX that it and Dr. Leutenegger developed the
`Antech FastPanel® Ringworm PCR independently, and that Dr. Leutenegger neither disclosed nor used
`any of IDEXX’s proprietary or confidential information in doing so:
`Your letters make a number of contentions and assumptions concerning
`Antech’s alleged use of IDEXX’s trade secrets and confidential/proprietary
`information. Antech believes that such contentions and assumptions are
`unfounded, and that it and Dr. Leutenegger have complied fully with the
`affidavits referenced in your letters. Antech takes these obligations very
`seriously, and is amenable to providing additional information confirming
`its compliance.
`
`Ex. 7.
`
`32.
`But IDEXX continued to threaten litigation, asserting that Antech’s letter “raises more
`questions than it answers.” Ex. 8 at 1. IDEXX’s continued threats compelled Antech and Dr.
`Leutenegger to file this Complaint to clarify their rights and resolve these issues.
`D.
`The core steps of qPCR tests are standardized and public, and the fact that Antech
`used them in its FastPanel® Ringworm PCR does not constitute evidence of
`misappropriation.
`33.
`IDEXX claims that Dr. Leutenegger and Antech misappropriated or will misappropriate
`“reverse transcription, amplification and detection” and “the IDEXX methodology of operating
`RealPCRs within a single set of conditions for extraction.” Ex. 1 at 1. But these are in fact the core
`components of real-time PCR tests, and are both public and standardized in the industry.
`34. Modern technology allows scientists and clinicians to analyze genetic material in the form
`of DNA and RNA. The presence of foreign DNA or RNA in an animal sample (meaning DNA or RNA
`other than the animal’s own) can indicate the presence of a pathogen. Identifying that foreign pathogen
`can enable the diagnosis of a disease.
`35.
`DNA and RNA in their naturally occurring states, however, are present in only trace
`amounts. Thus, to detect and analyze foreign pathogens using the genes that indicate their presence (the
`“target” DNA), a laboratory instrument must be used to increase the amount of DNA or RNA available
`for analysis and simultaneously track the rate at which it accumulates. The faster the target DNA or
`RNA accumulates, the more target DNA or RNA that was initially present in the sample, and the more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 11 of 36
`
`severe the infection.
`36.
`This laboratory process, known as quantitative PCR (qPCR), “real-time” PCR, or as
`IDEXX has branded it, “RealPCR,” has become a standard technique in diagnostic molecular biology
`since its invention in 1991.
`37. When performed on a sample of DNA, qPCR can be broken down into three main steps:
`(i) extraction; (ii) amplification; and (iii) detection. In the case of RNA, qPCR involves an additional step
`of reverse transcription between steps (i) and (ii). This is because the qPCR process can only amplify
`DNA and not RNA. Reverse transcription converts RNA to complementary DNA (“cDNA”), which then
`can be amplified and detected.
`38.
`IDEXX asserts that each of these steps reflects use of its trade secrets. But as set forth
`below, the steps of extraction, reverse transcription, amplification, and detection are standardized and
`public—indeed, IDEXX itself has published that it performs these steps in the standardized ways
`described below. Thus, the mere fact that Antech, like IDEXX, uses these standard steps cannot be
`evidence of misappropriation of IDEXX’s trade secrets.
`1.
`Extraction: removing genetic material from a sample.
`39.
`Real-time PCR involves analyzing genetic material—DNA or RNA. In veterinary
`diagnostics, a clinician obtains from the animal a sample—typically blood, saliva, hair, or tissue. That
`sample is then sent to a reference laboratory such as IDEXX or Antech for testing. The extraction
`process removes the DNA or RNA from that sample and then purifies the DNA or RNA to ready it for
`qPCR testing.
`40.
`IDEXX claims as a trade secret “the IDEXX methodology of operating RealPCRs within
`a single set of conditions for extraction.” Ex. 1 at 1. However, as set forth in more detail below, both the
`process of extracting DNA and RNA from animal samples and the chemical formulations used to
`effectuate each step in the extraction process are both public and standardized. Indeed, IDEXX’s own
`“RealPCR* Technical Guide,” which is available online, describes IDEXX’s method of extraction. Ex. 9
`at 7.
`///
`///
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 12 of 36
`
`41.
`
`Extracting DNA and RNA from animal samples involves the following steps:
`
`
`
`a.
`Cells from the sample are ruptured or “lysed” by placing them into a solution
`known as a lysis buffer solution. This process of “lysis” releases the contents of the cells—including the
`cells’ genetic material—into the solution. The lysis buffer solution Dr. Leutenegger developed at Antech
`is based on a formulation that is widely used and has been in the public domain for over 20 years.
`b.
`The proteins from the solution of ruptured cells are then removed, leaving behind
`the dissolved DNA and RNA. This is accomplished by adding a solution of phenol and chloroform—a
`formulation also widely known in the industry, and originally published in 1967.4 After the proteins
`have been removed, the DNA or RNA is converted from its dissolved state into its solid form by a well-
`known technique of adding a solution containing ethanol or isopropanol.
`c.
`The solid DNA or RNA is then purified by binding the molecules to glass or silica
`particles and washing away any remaining contaminants using different wash solutions. It is well known
`that either glass or silica can accomplish this goal. The methods of such purification and the wash
`solution formulations used are widely known and routinely used in the field.5
`IDEXX’s reference to operating the extraction process under “a single set of conditions”
`42.
`merely refers to the idea of standardizing the above method of extraction across different sample types
`and for different real-time PCR tests. Standardizing the method of extraction is commonplace in the
`field. Indeed, Dr. Leutenegger proposed, published, and implemented a method of qPCR standardization
`for veterinary applications in 2001, while working at the University of California, Davis—well before his
`
`
`4 K. S. Kirby and E. A. Cook, Isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from mammalian tissues, Biochem J.
`104(1):254–257 (1967).
`5 See, e.g., Bert Vogelstein and David Gillespie, Preparative and analytical purification of DNA from
`agarose, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76(2):615–619 (1979) (describing a method of binding DNA to
`glass using what’s now known as the “Patterson Protocol”).
`
`11
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 13 of 36
`
`employment at IDEXX began.6 Indeed, one of the sample types submitted for various qPCR panels Dr.
`Leutenegger commercialized while at UC Davis was capable of being extracted simultaneously for use in
`qPCR to detect feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) as well as other infectious pathogens. IDEXX has
`not identified any specific “set of conditions” governing the method of extraction for its RealPCR tests
`that could be proprietary.
`43. Moreover, Antech’s method of extraction and the conditions under which it is performed
`were developed from scratch based on a reagent kit and protocol first made commercially available by a
`third-party manufacturer in 2016—two years after IDEXX launched its RealPCR ringworm panel.
`2.
`Reverse transcription: converting RNA to DNA.
`44.
`As mentioned above, before the qPCR process can be performed on RNA, that RNA must
`be converted into cDNA. The process of converting RNA to cDNA is called “reverse transcription.” To
`convert RNA to cDNA, a scientist will use a naturally occurring enzyme called “reverse transcriptase.”
`This process and the reverse transcriptases that can be used in the laboratory, too, have been well known
`for decades.7
`
`RNA
`
`cDNA
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 Christian M. Leutenegger, The Real-Time TaqMan PCR and Applications in Veterinary Medicine,
`Veterinary Sciences of Tomorrow, Issue 1 (Jan. 2001),
`https://pcrlab.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk6571/files/inline-files/Real-Time-Taq-Man-PCR-
`Applications-Veterinary-Medicine.pdf; see also N. Pusterla, J.E. Madigan, and C.M. Leutenegger, Real-
`Time Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Novel Molecular Diagnostic Tool for Equine Infectious Diseases, J.
`Vet. Intern. Med. Vol. 20, 3–12 (2006).
`7 See e.g., Marc S. Krug and Shelby L. Berger, First-strand cDNA synthesis primed with oligo(dT), Meth.
`Enzymol. 152, 316–25 (1987).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF / CASE NO.
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:20-at-01217 Document 1 Filed 12/09/20 Page 14 of 36
`
`3.
`
`Amplification: multiplying genetic material so that it can be detected and
`measured.
`
`45.
`The next step in the real-time PCR process is amplification of the portion of the nucleic
`acid to be tested (referred to as the “target sequence”—for example, in ringworm, DNA from the fungus
`that causes ringworm). “Amplifying” a piece of DNA means increasing the number of occurrences of
`that piece of DNA in the sample so that it may be more easily analyzed or detected. Amplification
`occurs by precisely heating and cooling a sample of DNA with certain reagents. As with extraction and
`reverse transcription, both the method and the chemicals used to amplify DNA are standardized and
`known in the industry.
`a.
`First, the DNA is heated to a specific temperature for several seconds to break the
`hydr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket