throbber
View Full Docket

Case Title

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Docket Number

3:10-cv-03561

Court

California Northern District Court

Document Title

No. 1190 JURY VERDICT (Phase II). (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed ...

Date Filed

05/23/2012
Download All
Cite Document
Download Current View
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1190 Filed05/23/12 Page1 of 2
Case3:10—cv—O3561—WHA Document119O Fi|edO5/23/12 Pagel of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

No. C 10-03561 WHA

Plaintiff,

V.

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendant.

SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS.

1.

Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google infringes

claim 11, 27, 29, 39, 40, or 41 of United States Patent Number RE38,104?

Yes '
(lnfrlngmg)

CLAIM 11:

CLAIM 27:

CLAIM 29:

CLAIM 39:

CLAIM 40:

CLAIM 41:



UnitedStatesDistrictCourt







FortheNunhcrnDistrict()FCa1if0miu







Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1190 Filed05/23/12 Page2 of 2
Case3:10—cv—O3561—WHA Document119O Fi|edO5/23/12 Page2 of2

2.

Has Oracle proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Google infringes

claim 1 or 20 0fUnitcd States Patent Number 6,061,520‘?

Yes
(Infringing)

No
(Not Prov n)

CLAIM 1:

CLAIM 20:

3.

Has Oracle proven by clear and convincing evidence that Googlc willfully

infringed one or more claims of an asserted patent? (Answer this question only if above you

Nlft

answered “Yes” to one or more claims of a given patent.)

Yes

(Wil1ful)

No

(Not Proven)

FOR THE ’104 PATENT:

FOR THE ’520 PATENT:





FOREP ‘RSON

Dated: May 23 , 2012.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



UnitedStatesDistrictCourt







FortheNorthernDistrictofCaliforniz1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up in order to view it.


Or .

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account account view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

Go back to the docket to see more.