throbber
Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`NorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`bo
`
`Bw
`
`oOCOsDWWN
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OWENDIAZ,
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-06748-WHO
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`TESLA,INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`We,the Jury, find as follows:
`
`1. Was Owen Diaz subjected to a racially hostile work environment by Tesla, Inc.?
`
`(Instruction Nos. 26-33).
`
`J YES
`
`NO
`
`Ifyou answered “yes,” proceed to the next question. Ifyou answered “no,” proceed to
`
`question 4.
`
`2. Was Tesla, Inc., a joint employer of Owen Diaz? (Instruction No. 24)
`
`J YES
`
`NO
`
`Ifyou answered “yes,” proceed to the next question. Ifyou answered “no,” answer
`
`question 4.
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`—_
`
`&.WHWN
`oOSSNNDW
`
`
`
`NorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`3. Did Owen Diaz proveall of the elementsof:
`A. Hostile work environment caused by a
`
`J YES
`
`supervisor (Instruction No. 29)
`
`B. Hostile work environment caused by a
`non-immediate supervisor or co-worker
`
`ft
`
`YES
`
`NO
`
`NO
`
`(Instruction No. 32)
`
`Answer the next question.
`
`. Did Owen Diaz proveall of the elementsofliability based on civil rights violation in a
`
`contractual relationship? (Instruction No. 37)
`v YES
`NO
`
`Ifyou answered “no”to questions 3A, 3B, and 4, skip question 5 andproceed to question
`
`6.
`
`. Did Tesla,Inc., fail to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent Owen Diaz from
`
`being subject to racial harassment? (Instruction No. 34)
`
`J YES
`
`NO
`
`Answerthe next question.
`
`. Did Tesla, Inc.’s negligent supervision or continued employment of Ramon Martinez
`
`cause harm to Owen Diaz? (Instruction No. 35)
`
`J YES
`
`NO
`
`Ifyou answered “yes” to either question 3, 4, 5, or 6 answer the next question. Ifyou
`
`answered “no”to all ofthose questions, thejuryforeperson should sign, date, and return thisjury
`
`questionnaire.
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 3 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`DAMAGES
`
`(Instruction Nos. 38-41)
`
`7. What past non-economic damages did Owen Diaz sustain as a result of Tesla, Inc.’s
`
`unlawful conduct?
`
`$_4 500,000
`
`Go to the next question.
`
`8. What future non-economic damages is Owen Diaz likely to sustain as a result of Tesla,
`
`Inc.’s unlawful conduct?
`
`$_ 2,400 OOO
`
`PUNITIVE DAMAGESFOR CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIMS
`
`(Instruction No. 40)
`
`9. You may only award punitive damagesfor the reasons discussed in Instruction No. 40, that
`
`is, if you find that the defendant’s conduct that harmed the plaintiff was malicious,
`oppressive orin reckless disregard ofthe plaintiff's rights. Do you find by a
`
`preponderanceof the evidence that Owen Diazis entitled to punitive damages against
`
`Tesla Inc. for either creating a hostile work environment based on race (question 3A or
`
`3B), violating civil rights in a contractual relationship (question 4), and/orfailing to
`
`prevent harassmentbased on race in the workplace (question 5)?
`
`J YES
`
`NO
`
`Ifyou answered “yes” to question 9, answer the next question. Ifyou answered “no,” sign
`
`date and return thisjuror questionnaire.
`
`OoCOJDDAnAFSWDHO
`
`NyNONONYHONYYNHNNOFFFFKFFEFFOFRPOeleaoSNDNUUFBWYNYKFDoOoBHHNDHHWFFWDNYKK&S
`
`
`
`NorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 4 of 4
`Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 291 Filed 10/04/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`10. What amount of punitive damages do you award to Owen Diaz?
`
`$
`
`| 30,000,000
`
`
`When you have reachedyourverdict, thejuryforeperson should sign and date thisform
`
`and contact the courtroom deputy, Ms. Davis.
`
`DATED: October 4, 202\
`
`JURY FOREPERSON
`
`—oOfoNYDBWwWFPWLO
`
`
`
`NorthernDistrictofCalifornia
`
`
`
`
`
`UnitedStatesDistrictCourt
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket