throbber
Case 3:19-md-02913-WHO Document 1171 Filed 12/04/20 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`IN RE: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING SALES
`PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
`LITIGATION
`This Document Relates to All Plaintiffs Identified in
`Exhibit A
`
`
`3:19-md-02913 (WHO)
`
`Hon. William H. Orrick
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JLI’S NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
`SUBMIT DISCOVERY REQUIRED BY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 8
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on January 15, 2021, or as soon thereafter as this matter may be
`heard, in Courtroom 2 of this Court, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 17th Floor, San Francisco,
`California, Defendant Juul Labs, Inc. (“JLI”) will and hereby does move for the Court to dismiss without
`prejudice plaintiffs identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B to JLI’s Motion for failure to submit discovery
`required by Case Management Order No. 8. The Motion is based on this Notice of Motion and the
`following Motion to Dismiss.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JLI’s Notice of Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
`For Failure to Submit Discovery Required
`By Case Management Order No. 8
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-md-02913-WHO Document 1171 Filed 12/04/20 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Renee D. Smith/
`Renee D. Smith
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle
`Chicago, IL 60654-3406
`Telephone: (312) 862-2000
`Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
`Renee.Smith@kirkland.com
`
`Peter A. Farrell, P.C.
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 389-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 389-5200
`Peter.farrell@kirkland.com
`Gregory P. Stone (SBN 78329)
`gregory.stone@mto.com
`Bethany W. Kristovich (SBN 241891)
`bethany.kristovich@mto.com
`John M. Gildersleeve (SBN 284618)
`john.gildersleeve@mto.com
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue, 50th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3426
`Telephone: (213) 683-9100
`Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
`Attorneys for Defendant Juul Labs, Inc.
`
`2
`JLI’s Notice of Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
`For Failure to Submit Discovery Required
`By Case Management Order No. 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 4, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-md-02913-WHO Document 1171 Filed 12/04/20 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on December 4, 2020, I electronically served the foregoing Motion on all
`counsel of record in this action using the CM/ECF system.
`
`
`/s/ Renee D. Smith
`Renee D. Smith
`
`JLI’s Notice of Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
`For Failure to Submit Discovery Required
`By Case Management Order No. 8
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-md-02913-WHO Document 1171 Filed 12/04/20 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`IN RE: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING SALES
`PRACTICE AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
`LITIGATION
`This Document Relates to All Plaintiffs Identified in
`Exhibit A
`
`
`3:19-md-02913 (WHO)
`
`Hon. William H. Orrick
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JLI’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT
`DISCOVERY REQUIRED BY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 8
`
`Case Management Order (“CMO”) No. 8 requires that every plaintiff asserting a personal injury
`or wrongful death claim in a case entered on the MDL 2913 docket submit a substantially complete
`Plaintiff Fact Sheet (“PFS”) within 60 days after the complaint has been entered. (CMO No. 8 § 5 (Docket
`No. 406).) Numerous plaintiffs did not comply.
`Pursuant to Sections 5 and 12 of CMO No. 8, on October 26, 2020, JLI served counsel of record
`for plaintiffs identified in Exhibit A with a Notice of Overdue Discovery (the “October 26th Notice”),
`identifying their overdue discovery, and notifying them that their cases may be subject to dismissal for
`failure to comply with the Court’s discovery orders. (Id. ¶ 12; Affidavit of Christina Sharkey (“Aff.”) ¶¶
`4-5.) One of the nine plaintiffs identified in Exhibit A failed to serve a Plaintiff Fact Sheet even after JLI
`granted him an additional 30-day extension. (Aff. ¶ 3.)
`Plaintiffs identified in the October 26th Notice were required to submit a completed PFS on or
`before November 25, or risk having their claims dismissed. (CMO No. 8 ¶ 12.) None of the plaintiffs
`identified in Exhibit A responded to the October 26th Notice, and none of the plaintiffs identified in
`Exhibit A have subsequently produced a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. (Aff. ¶¶ 6-7.)
`Pursuant to Sections 5 and 12 of CMO No. 8, on November 3, 2020, JLI served counsel of record
`for plaintiffs identified in Exhibit B with a Notice of Overdue Discovery (the “November 3rd Notice”),
`identifying their overdue discovery, and notifying them that their cases may be subject to dismissal for
`failure to comply with the Court’s discovery orders. (Id. ¶ 12; Aff ¶¶ 4-5.) Two of the thirteen plaintiffs
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`JLI’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
`For Failure to Submit Discovery Required
`By Case Management Order No. 8
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-md-02913-WHO Document 1171 Filed 12/04/20 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`identified in Exhibit B failed to serve a Plaintiff Fact Sheet even after JLI granted them an additional 30-
`day extension. (Aff. ¶ 3.)
`Plaintiffs identified in the November 3rd Notice were required to submit a completed PFS on or
`before December 3, or risk having their claims dismissed. (CMO No. 8 ¶ 12.) None of the plaintiffs
`identified in Exhibit B responded to the November 3rd Notice, and none of the plaintiffs identified in
`Exhibit B have subsequently produced a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. (Aff. ¶¶ 6-7.)
`Pursuant to CMO No. 8, JLI hereby moves to dismiss, without prejudice, the claims of the plaintiffs
`identified in Exhibits A and B who have not submitted a completed PFS. Pursuant to CMO No. 8,
`Plaintiffs subject to the foregoing Motion must file a response no later than December 18, 2020, either
`(a) certifying that the plaintiff has submitted a completed PFS or (b) opposing the Motion for other reasons.
`
`
`Dated: December 4, 2020
`
`/s/ Renee D. Smith
`Renee D. Smith
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`300 North LaSalle
`Chicago, IL 60654-3406
`Telephone: (312) 862-2000
`Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
`Renee.Smith@kirkland.com
`
`Peter A. Farrell, P.C.
`KIRKLAND & ELLI LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 389-5000
`Facsimile: (202) 389-5200
`Peter.farrell@kirkland.com
`Gregory P. Stone (SBN 78329)
`gregory.stone@mto.com
`Bethany W. Kristovich (SBN 241891)
`bethany.kristovich@mto.com
`John M. Gildersleeve (SBN 284618)
`john.gildersleeve@mto.com
`MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`350 South Grand Avenue, 50th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3426
`Telephone: (213) 683-9100
`Facsimile: (213) 687-3702
`Attorneys for Defendant Juul Labs, Inc.
`2
`
`JLI’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
`For Failure to Submit Discovery Required
`By Case Management Order No. 8
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:19-md-02913-WHO Document 1171 Filed 12/04/20 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on December 4, 2020, I electronically served the foregoing Motion on all
`counsel of record in this action using the CM/ECF system.
`
`
`/s/ Renee D. Smith
`Renee D. Smith
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket