throbber
Case 3:20-cv-05293-RS Document 34 Filed 11/17/20 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`SANDERSON FARMS, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`)
`Plaintiffs In Defense of Animals and Friends of the Earth, and Defendant Sanderson Farms, Inc.,
`by and through their counsel, make the following stipulated request for a stay pending the U.S. Court of
`Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s resolution of the appeal pending in Friends of the Earth v. Sanderson
`Farms, Inc., No. 19-16669 (9th Cir.), which is an appeal of this Court’s July 31, 2019 dismissal order in
`the related case reported at Friends of the Earth v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., No. 17-cv-03592-RS, 2019 WL
`3457787 (N.D. Cal. 2019). In support of their request, and pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties state as
`follows:
`
`1. Following filing of the Complaint in this action on July 31, 2020, the parties conferred regarding
`
`whether proceedings in this case should be stayed pending resolution of the Friends of the Earth
`
`appeal.
`
`2. On September 24, 2020, the parties filed a stipulated request for a preliminary schedule. See ECF No.
`
`28. Pursuant to that request, the parties agreed to postpone the deadline for Sanderson to file its
`
`responsive pleading until at least December 3, 2020. The parties further agreed to meet and confer
`
`following oral argument in the Friends of the Earth appeal—including as to (a) whether a full stay of
`
`this case is warranted pending the Ninth Circuit’s resolution of the appeal in Friends of the Earth;
`
`(b) a schedule for the filing of Sanderson’s responsive pleading in this case; and (c) the timing, scope,
`
`and limits of discovery, if necessary—and to file a joint statement with the Court following that
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:20-CV-05293 (RS)
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:20-CV-05293 (RS)
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
`LIMITED STAY PENDING NINTH
`CIRCUIT DECISION IN FRIENDS OF
`THE EARTH V. SANDERSON FARMS,
`INC. AND UPDATED JOINT CASE
`MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS and FRIENDS OF
`THE EARTH,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05293-RS Document 34 Filed 11/17/20 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`conference. The parties further agreed not to pursue discovery or undertake any other activities in this
`
`case until the filing of that joint statement. The parties expressly reserved their right to move this
`
`Court for a stay should in the event it became necessary.
`
`3. The Court entered an order approving of the parties’ stipulation later the same day. See ECF No. 30.
`
`4. The Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in the Friends of the Earth appeal on October 13, 2020. The
`
`panel has not yet issued a decision in the case.
`
`5. Subsequent to the argument, the parties have conferred and now stipulate as follows and ask this Court
`
`to enter an order accordingly:
`
`i. The parties stipulate to a stay until the earlier of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the
`
`Friends of the Earth appeal or one hundred twenty (120) additional days from
`
`December 3, 2020, which is April 2, 2021.
`
`ii.
`
`If the Ninth Circuit does not issue a decision by April 2, 2021, the parties will meet and
`
`confer the week of April 5, 2021, regarding further scheduling.
`
`iii.
`
`If the Ninth Circuit does issue a decision by April 2, 2021, then within twenty-one (21)
`
`days of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the Friends of the Earth appeal, Sanderson will
`
`file its responsive pleading in In Defense of Animals and the parties will meet and
`
`confer regarding the timing, scope, and limits of discovery, if any.
`
`iv.
`
`Following their meet-and-confer, and within twenty-one (21) days of the Ninth
`
`Circuit’s decision in the Friends of the Earth appeal, the parties will file an additional
`
`Joint Case Management Statement and, if necessary, request a further Case
`
`Management Conference with the Court.
`
`The parties submit this as their updated joint case management statement. Neither party requests
`
`a further case management conference at this time.
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:20-CV-05293 (RS)
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05293-RS Document 34 Filed 11/17/20 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`November 17, 2020
`
`/s/ Michael Glick
`Mark McKane, P.C. (SBN 230552)
`mark.mckane@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`555 California Street
`San Francisco, California 94104
`Telephone: (415) 439-1400
`
`Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
`gregg.locascio@kirkland.com
`Michael Glick (admitted pro hac vice)
`michael.glick@kirkland.com
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`Telephone: (202) 389-5000
`
`Attorneys for Sanderson Farms, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Gretchen Elsner
`Gretchen Elsner (admitted pro hac vice)
`ELSNER LAW & POLICY, LLC
`Gretchen@ElsnerLaw.org
`314 South Guadalupe Street
`Santa Fe, NM 87501
`Telephone: (505) 303-0980
`
`Paige M. Tomaselli (CSB No. 237737)
`THE LAW OFFICE OF
`PAIGE M. TOMASELLI
`P.O. Box 71022
`Richmond, CA 94807
`paige@tomasellilaw.com
`Telephone: (619) 339-3180
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:20-CV-05293 (RS)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05293-RS Document 34 Filed 11/17/20 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I am the ECF user whose user ID and password are
`
`being used in the electronic filing of this document, and further attest that I have obtained the concurrence
`in the filing of the document from the other signatory.
`
`
`/s/ Michael Glick
`Michael Glick
`
`
`
`STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:20-CV-05293 (RS)
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket