throbber
Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 1 of 32
`
`
`
`MICHAEL W. BIEN – Cal. Bar No. 096891
`VAN SWEARINGEN – Cal. Bar No. 259809
`ALEXANDER GOURSE – Cal. Bar No. 321631
`AMY XU – Cal. Bar No. 330707
`ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
`101 Mission Street, Sixth Floor
`San Francisco, California 94105-1738
`Telephone:
`(415) 433-6830
`Facsimile:
`(415) 433-7104
`Email:
`mbien@rbgg.com
`
`vswearingen@rbgg.com
`
`agourse@rbgg.com
`
`axu@rbgg.com
`
`KELIANG (CLAY) ZHU – Cal. Bar No. 305509
`DEHENG LAW OFFICES PC
`7901 Stoneridge Drive #208
`Pleasanton, California 94588
`Telephone:
`(925) 399-5856
`Facsimile:
`(925) 397-1976
`Email:
`czhu@dehengsv.com
`
`ANGUS F. NI – Wash. Bar No. 53828*
`AFN LAW PLLC
`502 Second Avenue, Suite 1400
`Seattle, Washington 98104
`Telephone:
`(773) 543-3223
`Email:
`angus@afnlegal.com
`* Pro Hac Vice application forthcoming
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`U.S. WECHAT USERS ALLIANCE,
`CHIHUO INC., BRENT COULTER,
`FANGYI DUAN, JINNENG BAO,
`ELAINE PENG, and XIAO ZHANG,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
` Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY
`AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official
`capacity as President of the United States,
`and WILBUR ROSS, in his official
`capacity as Secretary of Commerce,
`
`Defendants.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 2 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`1.
`
`Public space in the digital age is defined by platforms and users rather than
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`3
`
`physical places with geographic boundaries. Cyberspace, particularly social media, is one
`
`4
`
`of “the most important places” to exchange views. Packingham v. North Carolina, 582
`
`5
`
`U.S. —, 137 S. Ct. 1730, 1735 (2017). Few digital public squares are as large as that
`
`6
`
`found on WeChat. Released in 2011, WeChat is now one of the world’s most popular
`
`7
`
`mobile telephone applications (“app”), with over 1 billion monthly active users.1
`
`8
`
`2.
`
`Approximately 19 million users rely on the app in the United States, and it is
`
`9
`
`the primary app Chinese-speakers in the U.S. use to participate in social life by connecting
`
`10
`
`with loved ones, sharing special moments, arguing ideas, receiving up-to-the minute news,
`
`11
`
`and participating in political discussions and advocacy.2 As a “super-app,” WeChat users
`
`12
`
`also rely on the app to make telephone calls, hold video conferences, upload documents,
`
`13
`
`share photos, and make payments.3 It has become essential to the conduct of daily life for
`
`14
`
`its users, many of whom regularly spend hours each day on the app.
`
`15
`
`3. WeChat is also used for numerous societally important purposes, including
`
`16
`
`by public institutions. For example, as the coronavirus pandemic continues to separate
`
`17
`
`people physically, WeChat has been used in the United States by police departments to
`
`18
`
`inform the public about testing center locations, by volunteers to organize the delivery of
`
`19
`
`medical supplies, and by families to stay in touch with isolated elderly relatives in nursing
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`1 Rayna Hollander, WeChat has hit 1 billion monthly active users, BUSINESS INSIDER
`(Mar. 6, 2018, 11:59 a.m.), https://www.businessinsider.com/wechat-has-hit-1-billion-
`monthly-active-users-2018-3; Iris Deng and Celia Chen, How WeChat became China’s
`everyday mobile app, SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST (Aug. 16, 2018),
`https://www.scmp.com/tech/article/2159831/how-wechat-became-chinas-everyday-
`mobile-app.
`2 Rick Smith, Crackdown on WeChat could hinder millions of US users who rely on social
`media tool, WRAL TECHWIRE (Aug. 19, 2020),
`https://www.wraltechwire.com/2020/08/19/crackdown-on-wechat-could-hinder-millions-
`of-us-users-who-rely-on-social-media-tool/.
`3 Bani Sapra, This Chinese super-app is Apple’s biggest threat in China and could be a
`blueprint for Facebook’s future. Here’s what it’s like to use WeChat, which helps a billion
`users order food and hail rides, BUSINESS INSIDER (Dec. 21, 2019),
`https://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-superapp-wechat-best-feature-walkthrough-
`2019-12.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 3 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`homes. WeChat is also used by individuals and groups—including churches—for
`
`2
`
`religious and cultural purposes: group prayer, organizing for holidays and events, taking
`
`3
`
`care of the poor, sick and infirm, and education.
`
`4
`
`4.
`
`In the United States and across the world, national governments engage in
`
`5
`
`dragnet surveillance of digital communications of ordinary people. Because governmental
`
`6
`
`surveillance is all-pervasive and occurs at the network level, communications over
`
`7
`
`WeChat, like communications on all other apps that run on our systematically surveilled
`
`8
`
`internet infrastructure, are captured by this dragnet.
`
`9
`
`5.
`
`Despite widespread knowledge of these practices, hundreds of millions of
`
`10
`
`people in this country voluntarily use surveilled devices and apps to participate in all facets
`
`11
`
`of social and economic life every day. This is the case for WeChat users in the United
`
`12
`
`States, where it is widespread knowledge amongst users that both the United States and
`
`13
`
`Chinese governments monitor WeChat communications.4 WeChat users in the United
`
`14
`
`States continue to use and rely on the app, knowing that Big Brother is watching.
`
`15
`
`6.
`
`On August 6, 2020, the President issued Executive Order 13943 entitled
`
`16
`
`“Addressing the Threat Posed by WeChat, and Taking Additional Steps To Address the
`
`17
`
`National Emergency With Respect to the Information and Communications Technology
`
`18
`
`and Services Supply Chain,” 85 FR 48641 (“the Executive Order”). Citing national
`
`19
`
`security concerns, the Executive Order bans what appears to be all uses of WeChat by
`
`20
`
`anyone within the United States as well as “U.S. persons” outside the United States.
`
`21
`
`Section 1(a) of the Executive Order prohibits people and property subject to U.S.
`
`22
`
`jurisdiction from carrying out “transactions” with WeChat after 45 days of the Executive
`
`23
`
`Order’s issuance. Section 2(a) prohibits any transaction “by a United States person or
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`4 See Arjun Kharpal, Chinese tech giant Tencent reportedly surveilled foreign users of
`WeChat to help censorship at home, CNBC (May 8, 2020),
`https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/08/tencent-wechat-surveillance-help-censorship-in-
`china.html; Tim Lau, The Government Is Expanding Its Social Media Surveillance
`Capabilities, BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE (May 22, 2019).
`https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/government-expanding-its-
`social-media-surveillance-capabilities.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 4 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`within the United States” that evades, avoids, or violates the uncertain prohibition in
`
`2
`
`Section 1(a). Maddeningly, the Executive Order does not define what those transactions
`
`3
`
`include, leaving individuals and companies at a loss as to whether they will risk civil
`
`4
`
`and/or criminal prosecution and penalties if they do not fundamentally change the way
`
`5
`
`they communicate or run their businesses. The vaguely worded Executive Order was
`
`6
`
`issued without further explanation or a media briefing, and states that the Secretary of
`
`7
`
`Commerce shall identify what transactions are prohibited after 45 days—in effect,
`
`8
`
`delaying identification of what transactions are prohibited until after such transactions are
`
`9
`
`already prohibited.5
`
`10
`
`7.
`
`Neither the Executive Order itself nor the White House provided concrete
`
`11
`
`evidence to support the contention that using WeChat in the United States compromises
`
`12
`
`national security. Notably, no other nation has implemented a comprehensive WeChat ban
`
`13
`
`on the basis of any like-finding that WeChat is a threat to national security.6 The
`
`14
`
`Executive Order was, however, issued in the midst of the 2020 election cycle, during a
`
`15
`
`time when President Trump has made numerous anti-Chinese statements that have
`
`16
`
`contributed to and incited racial animus against persons of Chinese descent7—all outside
`
`17
`
`of the national security context.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`8.
`
`In a stark violation of the First Amendment, the Executive Order targets and
`
`
`5 Ana Swanson, Trump’s Orders on WeChat and TikTok Are Uncertain. That May Be the
`Point., N.Y. TIMES (Aug. 7, 2020),
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/07/business/economy/trump-executive-order-tiktok-
`wechat.html.
`6 See Maria Abi-Habib, India Bans Nearly 60 Chinese Apps, Including TikTok and
`WeChat, N.Y. TIMES (June 29, 2020, updated on June 30, 2020),
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/29/world/asia/tik-tok-banned-india-china.html (stating
`that India’s ban is “part of the tit-for-tat retaliation after the Indian and Chinese militaries
`clashed earlier this month.”).
`7 See, e.g., Nadia Kim, Asian Americans Suffer From Trump’s Racist Attacks Too, PUBLIC
`SEMINAR (July 23, 2020), https://publicseminar.org/essays/asian-americans-suffer-from-
`trumps-racist-attacks-too/; Li Zhou, Trump’s racist references to the coronavirus are his
`latest effort to stoke xenophobia, VOX (June 23, 2020),
`https://www.vox.com/2020/6/23/21300332/trump-coronavirus-racism-asian-americans;
`Matt Stevens, How Asian-American Leaders Are Grappling With Xenophobia Amid
`Coronavirus, N.Y. TIMES (Mar. 29, 2020, updated on April 10, 2020),
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/29/us/politics/coronavirus-asian-americans.html.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 5 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`silences WeChat users, the overwhelming majority of whom are members of the Chinese
`
`2
`
`and Chinese-speaking communities. It regulates constitutionally protected speech,
`
`3
`
`expression, and association and is not narrowly tailored to restrict only that speech which
`
`4
`
`presents national security risks to the United States. Accordingly, it is unconstitutionally
`
`5
`
`overbroad. Indeed, banning the use of WeChat in the United States has the effect of
`
`6
`
`foreclosing all meaningful access to social media for members of the Chinese-speaking
`
`7
`
`community, such as Plaintiffs, who rely on it to communicate and interact with others like
`
`8
`
`themselves. The ban on WeChat, because it substantially burdens the free exercise of
`
`9
`
`religion, also violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
`
`10
`
`9.
`
`The Executive Order runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process
`
`11
`
`Clause by failing to provide notice of the specific conduct that is prohibited; because of
`
`12
`
`this uncertainty, WeChat users in the United States are justifiably fearful of using WeChat
`
`13
`
`in any way and for any purpose—and also of losing access to WeChat. Since the
`
`14
`
`Executive Order, numerous users, including Plaintiffs, have scrambled to seek alternatives
`
`15
`
`without success. They are now afraid that by merely communicating with their families,
`
`16
`
`they may violate the law and face sanctions.
`
`17
`
`10. WeChat is the only “super-app” with a natively Chinese interface designed
`
`18
`
`for Chinese speakers. That is why it is the dominant social media and e-commerce
`
`19
`
`application amongst the global Chinese diaspora, which include Chinese communities in
`
`20
`
`the United States.8 These individuals, particularly those who do not speak English, are
`
`21
`
`completely reliant on WeChat to communicate, socialize, and express themselves. As
`
`22
`
`such, by prohibiting the use of only WeChat but not any similar applications (ones not
`
`23
`
`made in China and without Chinese interfaces), the Executive Order singles out people of
`
`24
`
`Chinese and Chinese-American ancestry and subjects them to disparate treatment on the
`
`25
`
`basis of race, ethnicity, nationality, national origin, and alienage. In doing so, the
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`8 Thuy Ong, Chinese social media platform WeChat reaches 1 billion accounts worldwide,
`THE VERGE (Mar. 5, 2018), https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/5/17080546/wechat-
`chinese-social-media-billion-users-china.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 6 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`Executive Order violates the Equal Protection Clause.
`
`2
`
`11.
`
`Finally, in issuing the Executive Order, the president acted beyond his
`
`3
`
`authority provided by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which precludes
`
`4
`
`the President from “directly or indirectly” regulating personal communications and the
`
`5
`
`international exchange of information.
`
`6
`
`12.
`
`The U.S. WeChat Users Alliance (“USWUA”), Chihuo, Inc., Brent Coulter,
`
`7
`
`Fangyi Duan, Jinneng Bao, Elaine Peng, and Xiao Zhang (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring
`
`8
`
`this suit to challenge the Executive Order, which eviscerates an irreplaceable cultural
`
`9
`
`bridge that connects Plaintiffs to family members, friends, business partners, customers,
`
`10
`
`religious community members, and other individuals with common interests within the
`
`11
`
`Chinese diaspora, located both in and outside of the United States. The Executive Order
`
`12
`
`has already harmed Plaintiffs, who are plagued with fear for the loss of their beloved
`
`13
`
`connections, whether it be with friends, family, community, customers, aid recipients of
`
`14
`
`the charities they run, or even strangers whose ideas enrich their lives. They have been
`
`15
`
`forced to divert time, energy, and money to seek alternative communication platforms,
`
`16
`
`download and save irreplaceable digital histories, plan for business closures, find other
`
`17
`
`sources of information, and try to obtain alternative contact information for those from
`
`18
`
`whom they will soon be separated. Even if they succeed to some extent in their mitigation
`
`19
`
`efforts, Plaintiffs will never be able to replace the full spectrum of the social interactivity
`
`20
`
`that WeChat offers, nor will they be able to find any social networking platform with
`
`21
`
`anything close to the same level of participation by the global Chinese diaspora—this is
`
`22
`
`because WeChat’s network effects, generated by its 1 billion-plus daily users, is
`
`23
`
`irreplaceable.
`
`24
`
`13.
`
`In short, the threatened displacement of these WeChat users from their public
`
`25
`
`space is an irreparable harm that requires judicial intervention.
`
`26
`
`14.
`
`For these reasons, and those discussed below, the Court should (1) declare
`
`27
`
`that the Executive Order is unlawful and unconstitutional, (2) enjoin Defendants from
`
`28
`
`enforcing the Executive Order to prohibit the use of WeChat in the United States by
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 7 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`individual users, businesses and groups, and (3) stay the implementation date of any of the
`
`2
`
`penalty provisions of Executive Order until a reasonable time after the Secretary of
`
`3
`
`Commerce promulgates definitions of “transactions” under the Executive Order.
`
`4
`
`5
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`15.
`
`The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to the Constitution and
`
`6
`
`laws of the United States. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
`
`7
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
`
`8
`
`16. An actual, present, and justiciable controversy exists between the parties
`
`9
`
`within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a).
`
`10
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims for declaratory and injunctive relief are authorized by 28
`
`11
`
`U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, by Rules 57 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and
`
`12
`
`by the general legal and equitable powers of this Court.
`
`13
`
`18. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 1391
`
`14
`
`(e)(1) because Defendant are officers of the United States acting in their official capacities
`
`15
`
`and (1) at least one plaintiff resides in this district; and (2) a substantial part of the events
`
`16
`
`or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this district. For the same reason,
`
`17
`
`intradistrict assignment is proper in the San Francisco Division. See N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-2.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff U.S. WeChat Users Alliance (“USWUA”) is a New Jersey nonprofit
`
`PARTIES
`
`20
`
`organization that is in the process of being registered under Internal Revenue Code section
`
`21
`
`501(c)(3), established by individuals in the United States for the purpose of opposing the
`
`22
`
`Executive Order. Plaintiff USWUA is made up of WeChat users located throughout the
`
`23
`
`United States who are not affiliated with WeChat, its parent company Tencent Holdings
`
`24
`
`Ltd. (“Tencent”), nor any political party or foreign government. Plaintiff USWUA runs on
`
`25
`
`public donations from WeChat users and organizes its efforts on WeChat. Plaintiff
`
`26
`
`USWUA is made up of individuals who want to continue using WeChat within the United
`
`27
`
`States and are currently suffering and will continue to suffer an injury based on the
`
`28
`
`Defendants’ actions.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 8 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`20.
`
`Plaintiff Elaine Peng is a United States citizen residing in Castro Valley,
`
`2
`
`California. Plaintiff Peng founded the Mental Health Association for Chinese
`
`3
`
`Communities (“MHACC”) in 2013 to provide mental health education, suicide prevention,
`
`4
`
`assistance, and other resources to her local Chinese community that is underserved by the
`
`5
`
`mental health profession due to language and cultural barriers. As president of MHACC,
`
`6
`
`Plaintiff Peng strives to make mental health programs available to those in need and has
`
`7
`
`received multiple awards for her work. Like much of the Chinese population in the United
`
`8
`
`States, Plaintiff Peng uses WeChat as her exclusive means to connect with her Chinese
`
`9
`
`families and friends, domestic or abroad. As most of the population MHACC serves relies
`
`10
`
`on WeChat to communicate, use of WeChat is also integral to MHACC’s mission to
`
`11
`
`provide mental health services and support to its members.
`
`12
`
`21.
`
`Plaintiff Brent Coulter is a United States citizen and WeChat user. Plaintiff
`
`13
`
`Coulter holds a Juris Doctor from the University of California, Hastings College of the
`
`14
`
`Law (“Hastings”), and lives in San Francisco, California. Plaintiff Coulter previously
`
`15
`
`lived in China for approximately five years, where he studied at Sichuan University and
`
`16
`
`worked in marketing. While in China, Plaintiff Coulter used WeChat as his main method
`
`17
`
`of communication to connect with friends and professional contacts. Now in the U.S., one
`
`18
`
`of Plaintiff Coulter’s professional goals is to bridge the gap between China and the U.S.
`
`19
`
`with regard to law and business. At Hastings, Plaintiff Coulter founded the Asian Law and
`
`20
`
`Business Association, through which he formed a partnership with the American Chamber
`
`21
`
`of Commerce (“AmCham”) in Southwest China. Each year, Plaintiff Coulter drafts two
`
`22
`
`chapters of AmCham’s annual white paper on U.S. business in China with his colleagues
`
`23
`
`in both countries. WeChat is central to Plaintiff Coulter’s annual collaboration and
`
`24
`
`remains the only way for him to connect with many of his professional contacts and
`
`25
`
`friends in China. Plaintiff Coulter relies on WeChat to build upon his professional career
`
`26
`
`which straddles law and business in the U.S. and China. Without WeChat, Plaintiff
`
`27
`
`Coulter would lose access to many of the relationships that he has built throughout his
`
`28
`
`studies and career.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 9 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`22.
`
`Plaintiff Xiao Zhang is a Chinese citizen with a valid visa residing in
`
`2
`
`Houston, Texas. She is employed as an engineer and founded a nonprofit organization
`
`3
`
`known as Hita Education Foundation that supports underserved students at the high school
`
`4
`
`in her hometown in China. Plaintiff Zhang uses WeChat to speak with administrators,
`
`5
`
`teachers, parents of school children, and to help identify underserved Chinese students who
`
`6
`
`would benefit from the program. Plaintiff Zhang’s nonprofit organization currently sends
`
`7
`
`donations of 300 yuan (approximately $43 dollars) to seven students per month to pay for
`
`8
`
`meals and school supplies. Plaintiff Zhang also uses WeChat to transfer the funds to each
`
`9
`
`individual student, and WeChat is her exclusive means to connect with her Chinese-
`
`10
`
`speaking family members and friends, domestic or abroad.
`
`11
`
`23.
`
`Plaintiff Fangyi “Amy” Duan is a Chinese citizen with a valid visa, and
`
`12
`
`resides in Santa Clara, California. Plaintiff Duan is employed as the chief executive
`
`13
`
`officer of Plaintiff Chihuo, Inc. (“Chihuo”), a corporation that is dually registered in both
`
`14
`
`California and Delaware.
`
`15
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiff Chihuo is a media and online retailer that creates content regarding
`
`16
`
`Chinese restaurants and cuisine for people residing in the United States. Plaintiff Chihuo
`
`17
`
`provides U.S. based merchants an e-commerce platform for targeting Chinese-speaking
`
`18
`
`consumers. Plaintiff Chihuo serves its customers by providing targeted marketing and
`
`19
`
`advertising services online. Plaintiff Chihuo delivers its targeted advertising and
`
`20
`
`marketing services primarily on several WeChat official accounts through its various
`
`21
`
`functions, including WeChat Moments. Plaintiff Chihuo employs or contracts with
`
`22
`
`approximately thirty people as part of its business. Plaintiff Chihuo’s WeChat accounts
`
`23
`
`cover 14 major metropolitan areas in the United States and are enjoyed by more than
`
`24
`
`640,000 readers.
`
`25
`
`25.
`
`Plaintiff Jinneng Bao is a United States permanent resident and lives in
`
`26
`
`Nassau County, New York. He is self-employed and runs several businesses including a
`
`27
`
`construction company primarily serving Chinese-speaking clients in New York. Plaintiff
`
`28
`
`Bao actively attends a Chinese church in New York and participates in Bible studies
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 10 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`regularly on WeChat. His Bible study group consists of mostly Chinese-speaking
`
`2
`
`members. Due to the pandemic, Plaintiff Bao’s Bible study group has stopped meeting in
`
`3
`
`person, and WeChat is the only way the group currently maintains communications with
`
`4
`
`one another.
`
`5
`
`26. Defendant Donald J. Trump (“President Trump”) is the President of the
`
`6
`
`United States. He is sued in his official capacity. In that capacity, he issued the Executive
`
`7
`
`Order challenged in this suit.
`
`8
`
`27. Defendant Wilbur Ross (“Secretary Ross”) is the United States Secretary of
`
`9
`
`Commerce. He is sued in his official capacity. In the Executive Order, the Secretary is
`
`10
`
`authorized to take actions, including adopting rules and regulations, to implement the
`
`11
`
`Executive Order.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`A. WeChat and App Capabilities
`
`28. WeChat is one of the most popular messaging applications in the world, with
`
`15
`
`a monthly user base of more than 1 billion people.9 Nearly every person in China with an
`
`16
`
`online presence has at least one WeChat account, and over one-third of them spend four
`
`17
`
`hours or more on the app every day—making WeChat an indispensable part of many
`
`18
`
`peoples’ lives and work.10
`
`19
`
`29.
`
`Though WeChat began as a messaging service, it is now a “super-app” that
`
`20
`
`serves a multitude of communicative needs, including making telephone calls, video
`
`21
`
`conferencing, sharing photos, commenting on other users’ posts, making payments, and
`
`22
`
`still other purposes.11
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`9 Arjun Kharpal, Everything you need to know about WeChat—China’s billion-user
`messaging app, CNBC (Feb. 3, 2019), https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/04/what-is-wechat-
`china-biggest-messaging-app.html.
`10 Li Yuan, To Cover China, There’s No Substitute for WeChat, N.Y. TIMES (Jan. 9,
`2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/09/technology/personaltech/china-wechat.html
`11 Bani Sapra, This Chinese super-app is Apple’s biggest threat in China and could be a
`blueprint for Facebook’s future. Here’s what it’s like to use WeChat, which helps a billion
`users order food and hail rides, BUSINESS INSIDER (Dec. 21, 2019),
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 11 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`30. One of WeChat’s primary uses is the app’s messaging capabilities, which
`
`2
`
`include both text and voice messaging. Messaging through WeChat is the preferred
`
`3
`
`method of communication in China, even when doing business. Through the app’s
`
`4
`
`messaging capabilities, users can have numerous ongoing conversations at one time, and
`
`5
`
`can also set up group texts within a family, a business, or among friends, to communicate
`
`6
`
`with the whole group simultaneously.
`
`7
`
`31. WeChat also has capabilities to make voice and video calls. WeChat users
`
`8
`
`often choose to make voice calls within the app rather than through their cellular telephone
`
`9
`
`provider because it is more convenient. Group voice conference calls and video chats—
`
`10
`
`comparable to Zoom video group calls—can also be easily made on WeChat.
`
`11
`
`32. WeChat includes a feature called “Moments” through which users can
`
`12
`
`upload photos, videos, share news articles, and compose text. WeChat users can comment
`
`13
`
`or like the post, similar to the capabilities of apps like Facebook or Instagram.
`
`14
`
`33. WeChat also supports many integrated services, such as banking and ride-
`
`15
`
`sharing, so that users do not need to use a separate app to get those services. Some
`
`16
`
`companies have launched “mini-programs” within WeChat instead of standalone apps,
`
`17
`
`making it more convenient for WeChat users to use their services.
`
`18
`
`34. WeChat has increasingly been adopted by older age groups in China,
`
`19
`
`including a significant percentage of those over 60.12 Even older users in their 70s use
`
`20
`
`WeChat at high levels for messaging, voice calls, reading articles, and making payments.13
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`B. WeChat Usage Specifically in the United States
`
`35.
`
`There are approximately 19 million daily active WeChat users in the United
`
`
`https://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-superapp-wechat-best-feature-walkthrough-
`2019-12.
`12 Clark Boyd, The Silver Lining: WeChat and China’s Over-60s, MEDIUM (Sept. 3, 2020),
`https://medium.com/swlh/the-silver-lining-wechat-and-chinas-over-60s-168b193fb516.
`13 Mansoor Iqbal, WeChat Revenue and Usage Statistics, BUSINESS OF APPS (updated
`July 30, 2020), https://www.businessofapps.com/data/wechat-statistics/.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 12 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`States.14 WeChat is very widely used within the Chinese-American community, which is
`
`2
`
`estimated to be four to five million people.15 WeChat is the dominant method for anyone
`
`3
`
`in the United States who regularly communicates with people in China because it is free, is
`
`4
`
`more convenient, and has better reception than traditional telephone calls. WeChat is used
`
`5
`
`in the United States not only to keep in touch with friends and family, but also academics,
`
`6
`
`professionals, and business people to discuss matters of professional importance. In the
`
`7
`
`United States, the vast majority of the Chinese-speaking population is on WeChat, creating
`
`8
`
`network-effects that encourage others to join and participate lest they be cut off entirely
`
`9
`
`from family, friends, and business circles.16 Simply put, WeChat is irreplaceable because
`
`10
`
`no other app has anywhere near the same number of users and engagement among the
`
`11
`
`Chinese-speaking community in the United States.
`
`12
`
`36. WeChat users in the United States use the app to communicate within
`
`13
`
`Chinese American communities in the United States and with Chinese speakers throughout
`
`14
`
`the world. Without access to WeChat, users in the United States will be cut off from their
`
`15
`
`cultural community in the U.S. and lose the main line of communication they have with
`
`16
`
`the rest of their family thousands of miles away. Plaintiffs Peng, Zhang, Bao, and Fang all
`
`17
`
`use WeChat while living in the United States to regularly communicate with their aging
`
`18
`
`parents or other family members who reside in China.
`
`19
`
`37.
`
`The importance of WeChat to Chinese Americans cannot be overstated
`
`20
`
`because a significant portion of these individuals speak little or no English. According to a
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`14 Krystal Hu, WeChat U.S. ban cuts off users link to families in China, REUTERS (Aug. 7,
`2020), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tencent-holdings-wechat-ban/wechat-us-
`ban-cuts-off-users-link-to-families-in-china-
`idUSKCN253339#:~:text=In%20the%20past%20three%20months,according%20to%20an
`alytics%20firms%20Apptopia.
`15 Gustavio Lopez, Neil G. Ruiz, and Eileen Patten, Key facts about Asian Americans, a
`diverse and growing population, PEW RESEARCH CENTER (Sept. 8, 2017),
`https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/08/key-facts-about-asian-americans/.
`16 Mohit Mittal, WeChat—The One App That Rules Them All, HARVARD BUSINESS
`SCHOOL DIGITAL INITIATIVE (Aug. 25, 2017), https://digital.hbs.edu/innovation-
`disruption/wechat%E2%80%8A-%E2%80%8Athe-one-app-rules/.
`
`[3601169.5]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`Case No. 3:20-cv-05910
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-05910 Document 1 Filed 08/21/20 Page 13 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`study by the Pew Research Center, 41% of the Chinese population in the United States are
`
`2
`
`not English proficient.17 Accordingly, a blanket prohibition on WeChat means that
`
`3
`
`millions of individuals in the United States will be unable to find a comparable substitute
`
`4
`
`on apps such as Facebook, which are designed for English-speaking users and primarily
`
`5
`
`have English-speaking user networks within the United States.
`
`6
`
`38. WeChat users in the United States use the app to engage in, organize, and
`
`7
`
`publicize religious and cultural practices. For instance, various churches with primarily
`
`8
`
`Chinese congregants have WeChat profiles and stream their services online.18 The Church
`
`9
`
`of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints uses WeChat to reach Chinese-American members
`
`10
`
`and potential congregants within China.19 WeChat users in the United States attend and
`
`11
`
`participate in religious services or events, such as funerals, weddings, or other gatherings
`
`12
`
`through the app. Plaintiff Jinneng Bao relies on WeChat exclusively to attend regular
`
`13
`
`Bible studies hosted by his Chinese church in New York. WeChat users in the United
`
`14
`
`States organize and celebrate various religious and cultural holidays through their activity
`
`15
`
`in WeChat groups. They post Moments about holidays such as the Chinese New Year, the
`
`16
`
`Mid-Autumn Moon Festival, Ching Ming Festival (when Chinese pe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket