throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 1 of 19
`
`
`
`Lalli Venkatakrishnan (Cal. Bar # 323747)
`
`CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
`1212 Broadway, Suite 800
`Oakland, CA 94612
`Phone: 510-676-0438
`Fax: 510-844-7150
`Email: lvenkat@biologicaldiversity.org
`
`
`Attorney for Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and
`Center for Environmental Health
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`Civ. No.
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`(Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq)
`
`
`
`CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
`
`and
`
`CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
`HEALTH
`
`
`
`
`
`ANDREW R. WHEELER, in his official
`capacity as Administrator of the United States
`Environmental Protection Agency,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 2 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1. This action is brought under the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 – 7671q,
`
`and seeks to compel the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
`
`(“EPA”) to carry out his outstanding legal obligations to: (1) promulgate a Federal
`
`Implementation Plan (“FIP”) addressing a permitting rule for the Mendocino County Air Quality
`
`Management District; (2) take final action on 51 state implementation plan elements submitted
`
`by the state of California to implement the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Eastern Kern
`
`(Kern County) nonattainment area; (3) take final action on the Rule No. 428 (New Source
`
`Review Requirements for New and Modified Major Sources in Federally Designated
`
`10
`
`Nonattainment Areas) submitted by the state of California to meet the moderate nonattainment
`
`11
`
`requirements under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Northern Sierra Air Quality
`
`12
`
`Management District; and (4) take final action on 7 state implementation plan elements
`
`13
`
`submitted by the state of Colorado to implement the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Denver
`
`14
`
`Metro/North Front Range nonattainment area.
`
`15
`
`2.
`
`Ozone air pollution has profound effects on human health. EPA has found that
`
`16
`
`short and long-term exposure to ozone can result in “enhanced respiratory symptoms in
`
`17
`
`asthmatic individuals, school absences, and premature mortality.” 73 Fed. Reg. 16,436, 16,440
`
`18
`
`(Mar. 27, 2008). Individuals particularly sensitive to ozone exposure include older adults, people
`
`19
`
`with heart and lung disease, people who work and exercise outdoors, and children. See 78 Fed.
`
`20
`
`Reg. 3086, 3088 (Jan. 15, 2013); 62 Fed. Reg. 38,653, 38,668 (July 18, 1997); 73 Fed. Reg.
`
`21
`
`16,436, 16,440 (Mar. 27, 2008).
`
`22
`
`3.
`
`EPA also found that some plant species are especially sensitive to ozone
`
`23
`
`pollution, which stunts growth, interferes with photosynthesis, and increases susceptibility to
`
`24
`
`disease, weather, and insects. These negative impacts have a damaging effect on the surrounding
`
`25
`
`ecosystem, including loss of biodiversity, habitat degradation, and water, nutrient, and carbon
`
`26
`
`cycling. Studies link long-term ozone exposure to adverse health effects in birds such
`
`27
`
`inflammation, ruptured blood vessels, lung failure, decreases in egg production and hatching,
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 3 of 19
`
`
`
`brood abandonment, and reduced growth.1
`
`4.
`
`Accordingly, Plaintiffs CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and
`
`CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH bring this action against Defendant ANDREW
`
`R. WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator for the EPA, to compel him to perform
`
`his mandatory duties to ensure health and public welfare protections promised under the Clean
`
`Air Act.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`5.
`
`This case is a Clean Air Act “citizen suit.” Therefore, the Court has jurisdiction
`
`over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction) and 42 U.S.C. §
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`7604(a) (Clean Air Act citizen suits).
`
`11
`
`6.
`
`An actual controversy exists between the parties. This case does not concern
`
`12
`
`federal taxes, is not a proceeding under 11 U.S.C. §§ 505 of 1146, and does not involve the
`
`13
`
`Tariff Act of 1930.
`
`14
`
`7.
`
`Thus, this Court has jurisdiction to order declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`15
`
`2201. If the Court orders declaratory relief, 28 U.S.C. § 2202 authorizes this Court to issue
`
`16
`
`injunctive relief.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiffs mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice of
`
`NOTICE
`
`19
`
`intent to sue regarding Claims 1 - 3 of this Complaint. EPA received the notice letter regarding
`
`20
`
`these claims in this Complaint on or about November 21, 2019.
`
`21
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiffs subsequently mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, written
`
`22
`
`notice of intent to sue regarding Claim 2 of this Complaint. EPA received the notice letter
`
`23
`
`regarding this violation in this Complaint on or about January 30, 2020.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`10.
`
`Plaintiffs subsequently mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, written
`
`
`
`1 Olivia V. Sanderfoot and Tracey Holloway, Air Pollution Impacts on Avian Species via Inhalation Exposure and
`Associated Outcomes, 12 Environ. Res. Lett. 083002 (2017), available at
`https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8051/pdf.
`
`2
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 4 of 19
`
`
`
`notice of intent to sue regarding Claim 1 - 3 of this Complaint. EPA received the notice letter
`
`regarding these violations in this Complaint on or about February 24, 2020.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiffs subsequently mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, written
`
`notice of intent to sue regarding Claim 4 (2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for Denver Metro/North
`
`Front Range nonattainment area, Colorado) of this Complaint. EPA received the notice letter
`
`regarding this violation in this complaint on or about April 2, 2020.
`
`12. More than sixty days have passed since EPA received the notice letters discussed
`
`above. EPA has not remedied the violations alleged in this Complaint. Therefore, a present and
`
`actual controversy exists between the parties.
`
`VENUE
`
`13.
`
`Defendant EPA resides in this judicial district. This civil action is brought against
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`an officer of the United States acting in his official capacity and a substantial part of the events
`
`13
`
`or omissions giving rise to the claims in this case occurred in the Northern District of California.
`
`14
`
`Some of the claims in this Complaint concerns EPA’s failure to perform mandatory duties with
`
`15
`
`regard to California. EPA Region 9, which is responsible for California, is headquartered in San
`
`16
`
`Francisco. Thus, events and omissions at issue in this action occurred at EPA’s Region 9
`
`17
`
`headquarters in San Francisco. Additionally, Plaintiff CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
`
`18
`
`HEALTH is headquartered in Oakland. Accordingly, venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28
`
`19
`
`U.S.C. § 1391(e).
`
`20
`
`21
`
`INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
`
`14.
`
`A substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to the claims in this case
`
`22
`
`occurred in the County of San Francisco. Accordingly, assignment to the Oakland or San
`
`23
`
`Francisco Division is proper pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-2(c) and (d).
`
`24
`
`25
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY is a non-profit 501(c)(3)
`
`PARTIES
`
`26
`
`corporation incorporated in California. The Center for Biological Diversity’s mission is to ensure
`
`27
`
`the preservation, protection, and restoration of biodiversity, native species, ecosystems, public
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 5 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`lands and waters, and public health through science, policy, and environmental law. Based on the
`
`understanding that the health and vigor of human societies and the integrity and wildness of the
`
`natural environmental are closely linked, the Center for Biological Diversity is working to secure
`
`a future for animals and plants hovering on the brink of extinction, for the ecosystems they need
`
`to survive, and for a healthy, livable future for all of us.
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff the CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH is an Oakland,
`
`California based non-profit organization that helps protect the public from toxic chemicals and
`
`promotes business products and practices that are safe for public health and the environment.
`
`The Center for Environmental Health works in pursuit of a world in which all people live, work,
`
`10
`
`learn and play in health environments.
`
`11
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiffs’ members live, work, recreate, travel and engage in activities throughout
`
`12
`
`the areas at issue in this Complaint and will continue to do so on a regular basis. Pollution in the
`
`13
`
`affected areas threatens and damages, and will continue to threaten and damage, the health and
`
`14
`
`welfare of Plaintiffs’ members. Pollution diminishes Plaintiffs’ members’ ability to enjoy the
`
`15
`
`aesthetic qualities and recreational opportunities of the affected area.
`
`16
`
`18.
`
`EPA’s failure to timely perform the mandatory duties described herein also
`
`17
`
`adversely affects Plaintiffs, as well as their members, by depriving them of procedural
`
`18
`
`protection, opportunities, and information that they are entitled to under the Clean Air Act.
`
`19
`
`Furthermore, EPA’s failure to perform its mandatory duties also creates uncertainty for
`
`20
`
`Plaintiffs’ members as to whether they are exposed to excess air pollution.
`
`21
`
`19.
`
`Defendant ANDREW R. WHEELER is sued in his official capacity as the
`
`22
`
`Administrator of the EPA. In that role, EPA has been charged by Congress with the duty to
`
`23
`
`administer the Clean Air Act, including the mandatory duties at issue in this case.
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`20.
`
`The above injuries will continue until the Court grants the relief requested herein.
`
`STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
`
`21.
`
` Congress enacted the Clean Air Act to “speed up, expand, and intensify the war
`
`27
`
`against air pollution in the United States with a view to assuring the air we breathe through the
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 6 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Nation is wholesome once again.” H.R. Rep. No. 1146, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 1,1, 1970 U.S. Code
`
`Cong. & Admin. News 5356, 5356.
`
`22.
`
`Commensurate with this goal, Congress authorized the Administrator of the
`
`United States Environmental Protection Agency to establish National Ambient Air Quality
`
`Standards (“NAAQS”) for “criteria pollutants,” which are air pollutants that “cause or contribute
`
`to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” 42
`
`U.S.C. § 7408(a)(1)(A).
`
`23.
`
`There are primary and secondary NAAQS. Id. § 7409(a)(1)(A). Primary NAAQS
`
`provide for “an adequate margin of safety…to protect the public health,” while secondary
`
`10
`
`NAAQS “protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects associated
`
`11
`
`with the presence of such air pollutants in the ambient air.” Id. § 7409(b)(1)-(2).
`
`12
`
`24.
`
`After promulgating a new or revised NAAQS, EPA determines whether
`
`13
`
`geographic areas are designated nonattainment (areas that do not meet the primary or secondary
`
`14
`
`NAAQS), attainment (areas that meet the primary or secondary NAAQS), or unclassifiable
`
`15
`
`(areas that cannot be classified based on available information). Id. § 7407(d)(1)(A).
`
`16
`
`25.
`
`States are required to submit State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) and plan
`
`17
`
`revisions that “provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement” of any NAAQS.
`
`18
`
`Id. § 7410(a)(1).
`
`19
`
`26. Within six months of a state submitting a SIP, EPA must make a completeness
`
`20
`
`finding. If a determination is not made within six months of submittal, the plan submission is
`
`21
`
`deemed administratively complete by operation of law. Id. § 7410(k)(1)(B).
`
`22
`
`27.
`
`EPA is required to take final action to approve, disapprove, or provide a
`
`23
`
`conditional approval or disapproval within twelve months of a SIP submittal being
`
`24
`
`administratively complete. Id. § 7410(k)(2)-(4).
`
`25
`
`28. Within two years of EPA finding that a state failed to submit a required SIP or
`
`26
`
`disapproval of a SIP submittal, EPA must promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan. Id. §
`
`27
`
`7410(c).
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 7 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`A.
`
`Mendocino County Air Quality Management District: 2008 8-hour Ozone
`
`NAAQS
`
`29.
`
`On July 3, 2017, EPA published a final rule, issuing a limited approval and
`
`limited disapproval of Mendocino County Air Quality Management District’s revised Rule 1-220
`
`for preconstruction review and permitting under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 82 Fed. Reg.
`
`30, 770 (July 3, 2017).
`
`30.
`
`EPA issued a limited disapproval because Mendocino County Air Quality
`
`Management District’s Rule 1-220 conflicted with the Clean Air Act’s requirement for
`
`10
`
`prevention of significant deterioration of air quality in areas designated “attainment” or
`
`11
`
`“unclassifiable” for pollutants regulated under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`EPA’s limited disapproval of Rule l-220 became effective on August 2, 2017. Id.
`
`As a result, EPA was required to promulgate a FIP no later than August 2, 2019,
`
`14
`
`unless the state of California submits and EPA approves a revised SIP, correcting the
`
`15
`
`deficiencies, before it is required to promulgate a new source review FIP. 42 U.S.C. §7410(c)(1).
`
`16
`
`33.
`
`To date, EPA has neither approved a revised SIP nor published a FIP addressing
`
`17
`
`the disapproval of revised Rule 1-220 for the Mendocino County Air Quality Management
`
`18
`
`District.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`B.
`
`Eastern Kern (Kern County), California: 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS
`
`34.
`
`On December 11, 2017, EPA issued a finding of failure to submit a SIP
`
`21
`
`addressing most of the requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the Eastern Kern (Kern
`
`22
`
`County) nonattainment area (“Eastern Kern nonattainment area”). 82 Fed. Reg. 58, 118 (Dec. 11,
`
`23
`
`2017).
`
`24
`
`35.
`
`The state of California subsequently submitted SIPs addressing 51 nonattainment
`
`25
`
`SIP elements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the Eastern Kern nonattainment area.
`
`26
`
`36.
`
`EPA has a mandatory duty to take final action on SIP submittals within twelve
`
`27
`
`months of those SIP submittals becoming administratively complete. 42 U.S.C. § 7410(k)(2)-(4).
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 8 of 19
`
`
`
`37.
`
`It has been more than 12 months since the nonattainment SIP elements in Table 1
`
`were deemed or found administratively complete.
`
`38.
`
`To date, EPA has not taken final action to approve, disapprove, or conditionally
`
`approve these nonattainment SIP elements for the Eastern Kern nonattainment area listed in
`
`Table 1 below.
`
`TABLE 1
`
`Element
`
`SIP Requirement
`
`Submittal Date
`
`Completion
`Date (no later
`than)
`
`Final Action
`Due Date
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`Contingency Measures
`Volatile Organic
`Compounds (“VOC”)
`and Nitrogen Oxides
`(“NOx”)
`
`10/25/17
`
`4/25/2018
`
`4/25/2019
`
`Emission Inventory
`
`10/25/2017
`
`4/25/2018
`
`4/25/2019
`
`Emission Statement
`
`10/25/2017
`
`4/25/2018
`
`4/25/2019
`
`Nonattainment NSR
`rules - Serious
`
`Ozone Attainment
`Demonstration
`
` Available Control
`Technology (“RACT”)
`Non-Control
`Technique Guidelines
`(“CTG”) Volatile
`Organic Compound
`(“VOC”) for Major
`Sources
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Aerospace
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Auto and Light-Duty
`Truck Assembly
`Coatings (2008)
`
`5/23/2018
`
`8/28/2018
`
`8/28/2019
`
`10/25/2017
`
`4/25/2018
`
`4/25/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`7
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 9 of 19
`
`
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Bulk Gasoline Plants
`
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Equipment Leaks from
`Natural Gas/Gasoline
`Processing Plants
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Factory Surface
`Coating of Flat Wood
`Paneling
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Fiberglass Boat
`Manufacturing
`Materials (2008)
`
`RACT VOC CTG Flat
`Wood Paneling
`Coatings (2006)
`
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Flexible Packaging
`Printing Materials
`(2006)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Fugitive Emissions
`from Synthetic
`Organic Chemical
`Polymer and Resin
`Manufacturing
`Equipment
`RACT VOC CTG
`Graphic Arts -
`Rotogravure and
`Flexography
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Industrial Cleaning
`Solvents (2006)
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 10 of 19
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Large Appliance
`Coatings (2007)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Large Petroleum Dry
`Cleaners
`
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Leaks from Gasoline
`Tank Trucks and
`Vapor Collection
`Systems
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Leaks from Petroleum
`Refinery Equipment
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Lithographic Printing
`Materials and
`Letterpress Printing
`Materials (2006)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Manufacture of High-
`Density Polyethylene,
`Polypropylene, and
`Polystyrene Resins
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Manufacture of
`Pneumatic Rubber
`Tires
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Manufacture of
`Synthesized
`Pharmaceutical
`Products
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Metal Furniture
`Coatings (2007)
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 11 of 19
`
`
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Miscellaneous
`Industrial Adhesives
`(2008)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Miscellaneous Metal
`Products Coatings
`(2008)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Paper, Film, and Foil
`Coatings (2007)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Petroleum Liquid
`Storage in External
`Floating Roof Tanks
`
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Plastic Parts Coatings
`(2008)
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Refinery Vacuum
`Producing Systems,
`Wastewater
`Separators, and
`Process Unit
`Turnarounds
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`SOCMI Air Oxidation
`Processes
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`SOCMI Distillation
`and Reactor Processes
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Shipbuilding/repair
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Solvent Metal
`Cleaning
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`27
`
`28
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`
`36
`
`
`
`
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`10
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 12 of 19
`
`
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Stage I Vapor Control
`Systems - Gasoline
`Service Stations
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Storage of Petroleum
`Liquids in Fixed Roof
`Tanks
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating for
`Insulation of Magnet
`Wire
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Automobiles and
`Light-Duty Trucks
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Cans
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Coils
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Fabrics
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Large Appliances
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Metal Furniture
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Miscellaneous Metal
`Parts and Products
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Surface Coating of
`Paper
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Tank Truck Gasoline
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`37
`
`38
`
`39
`
`40
`
`41
`
`42
`
`43
`
`44
`
`45
`
`46
`
`47
`
`48
`
`
`
`
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`11
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 13 of 19
`
`
`
`
`
`49
`
`50
`
`51
`
`.
`
`Loading Terminals
`
`RACT VOC CTG Use
`of Cutback Asphalt
`
`RACT VOC CTG
`Wood Furniture
`
`Reasonable Further
`Progress (“RFP”)
`Volatile Organic
`Compound (“VOC”)
`and Nitrogen Oxide
`(“NOx”) Moderate
`
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`8/9/2017
`
`2/9/2018
`
`2/9/2019
`
`10/25/2017
`
`04/25/2018
`
`04/25/2019
`
`C. Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District, California: 2008 8-hour
`
`Ozone NAAQS
`
`39.
`
`On September 6, 2016, the state of California submitted a SIP revising Northern
`
`Sierra Air Quality Management District’s New Source Review regulations to meet the moderate
`
`nonattainment requirements under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
`
`40.
`
` EPA determined that the state of California’s submission of Rule No. 428 (New
`
`Source Review Requirements for New and Modified Sources in Federally Designated
`
`Nonattainment Areas) met the minimum criteria for completeness on September 28, 2016. In any
`
`event, the Rule No. 428 submittal would have been deemed complete by no later than March 6,
`
`2017.
`
`41.
`
`EPA has a mandatory duty to take final action on SIP submittals within twelve
`
`months of those SIP submittals becoming administratively complete. 42 U.S.C. § 7410(k)(2)-(4).
`
`42.
`
`On February 19, 2020, the California Air Resource Commission submitted a
`
`revised Rule 428 to EPA for approval into the California SIP, and claimed to “withdraw” its
`
`September 6, 2016 submittal of the prior version of the rule. The February 19, 2020 update of the
`
`September 6, 2016 submittal does not change the due date for EPA’s final action.
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 14 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`43.
`
`To date, EPA has not taken final action to approve, disapprove, or conditionally
`
`approve this SIP submittal.
`
`D. Denver Metro/North Front Range nonattainment area, Colorado: 2008 8-hour
`
`Ozone NAAQS
`
`44.
`
`On July 3, 2018, EPA issued a final rule regarding SIP revisions for the 2008
`
`ozone NAAQS for the Denver Metro/North Front Range nonattainment area. 83 Fed. Reg. 31,
`
`068 (July 3, 2018). The final rule approved the majority of the SIP submittal except for
`
`Regulation No. 7, Section XVI. D-XIX. Id. At 31, 070-71.
`
`45.
`
`The state of Colorado subsequently submitted SIPs addressing 7 nonattainment
`
`10
`
`SIP elements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS for the Denver Metro/North Front Range
`
`11
`
`nonattainment area.
`
`12
`
`46.
`
`It has been more than 12 months since the nonattainment SIP elements in Table 2
`
`13
`
`were deemed or found administratively complete.
`
`14
`
`47.
`
`To date, EPA has not taken final action to approve, disapprove, or conditionally
`
`15
`
`approve these nonattainment SIP elements for the Denver Metro/North Front Range
`
`16
`
`nonattainment area listed in Table 2 below.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE 2
`
`SIP Elements
`
`Submittal Date
`
`Completion Date
`(no later than)
`
`Final Action
`Due Date
`
`Reasonably
`Achievable
`Control
`Technology
`(“RACT”)
`Volatile Organic
`Compound
`(“VOC”)
`Control
`Technique
`Guideline
`(“CTG”) Metal
`Furniture
`Coatings (2007)
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`13
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 15 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`RACT VOC
`CTG
`Miscellaneous
`Metal Products
`Coatings (2008)
`RACT VOC
`CTG Wood
`Furniture
`Manufacturing
`Operations
`(1996)
`RACT VOC
`CTG Industrial
`Cleaning
`Solvents (2006)
`
`RACT VOC
`CTG Aerospace
`(1997)
`
`Reg. No. 7,
`Section X (Use
`of Cleaning
`Solvents)
`
`Reg. No. 7,
`Section XIX
`(Control of
`Emissions from
`Specific Major
`Sources of VOC
`and/or NOx in
`the 8-Hour
`Ozone Control
`Area)
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`5/31/2017
`
`11/30/2017
`
`11/30/2018
`
`CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
`
`FIRST CLAIM
`
`(Failure to promulgate a FIP for part of Mendocino County’s New Source Review
`
`48.
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all paragraphs listed above.
`
`Program)
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 16 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`49.
`
`It has been more than two years since the effective date of EPA’s final rule,
`
`issuing a limited disapproval of Mendocino County Air Quality Management District’s revised
`
`Rule 1-220 for preconstruction review and permitting. 82 Fed. Reg. 30, 770.
`
`50.
`
`EPA has not promulgated a FIP to address the basis for its disapproval of revised
`
`Rule 1-220 and has not approved a SIP addressing the basis for that disapproval.
`
`51.
`
`Accordingly, EPA is in violation of its mandatory duty under 42 U.S.C. §
`
`7410(C)(1) with regard to revised Rule 1-220.
`
`SECOND CLAIM
`
`(Failure to take final action on the 2008 8-hour ozone SIP submittals for the Kern County
`
`nonattainment area, California)
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all paragraphs listed above.
`
`It has been more than twelve months since the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`13
`
`elements for the Kern County, California 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment area listed in Table
`
`14
`
`1 were administratively complete.
`
`15
`
`54.
`
`EPA has not taken final action to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve
`
`16
`
`the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP elements for the Kern County, California 2008 ozone
`
`17
`
`NAAQS nonattainment area listed in Table 1.
`
`18
`
`55.
`
`Accordingly, EPA is in violation of its mandatory duty under 42 U.S.C. §
`
`19
`
`7410(k)(2)-(4) to take final action on the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP elements for the Kern
`
`20
`
`County, California 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment area listed in Table 1.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`THIRD CLAIM
`
`(Failure to take final action on the 2008 8-hour ozone SIP submittals for the Northern
`
`Sierra Air Quality Management District, California)
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all paragraphs listed above.
`
`It has been more than twelve months since the Rule No. 428 SIP submittal for the
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`26
`
`Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District’s New Source Review regulations to meet the
`
`27
`
`moderate nonattainment requirements under the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 17 of 19
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`58.
`
`EPA has not taken final action to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve
`
`the Rule No. 428 SIP submittal.
`
`59.
`
`Accordingly, EPA is in violation of its mandatory duty under 42 U.S.C. §
`
`7410(k)(2)-(4) to take final action on the Rule No. 428 SIP submittal for the Northern Sierra Air
`
`Quality Management District.
`
`FOURTH CLAIM
`
`(Failure to take final action on the 2008 8-hour ozone SIP submittals for the Denver
`
`Metro/North Front Range nonattainment area, Colorado)
`
`Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all paragraphs listed above.
`
`It has been more than twelve months since the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP
`
`60.
`
`61.
`
`11
`
`elements for the Denver Metro/North Front Range nonattainment area listed in Table 2 were
`
`12
`
`administratively complete.
`
`13
`
`62.
`
` EPA has not taken final action to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve
`
`14
`
`the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP elements for the Denver Metro/North Front Range
`
`15
`
`nonattainment area listed in Table 2.
`
`16
`
`63.
`
`Accordingly, EPA is in violation of its mandatory duty under 42 U.S.C. §
`
`17
`
`7410(k)(2)-(4) to take final action on the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP elements for the
`
`18
`
`Denver Metro/North Front Range nonattainment area listed in Table 2.
`
`19
`
`REQUEST FOR RELIEF
`
`20
`
`Wherefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court:
`
`21
`
`64.
`
`Declare that EPA is in violation of the Clean Air Act with regard to its
`
`22
`
`nondiscretionary duty to perform each mandatory duty listed above;
`
`23
`
`65.
`
`Issue a mandatory injunction requiring EPA to perform its mandatory duties by
`
`24
`
`certain dates;
`
`25
`
`26
`
`66.
`
`67.
`
`27
`
`fees; and
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Retain jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing the Court’s order;
`
`Grant Plaintiffs their reasonable costs of litigation, including attorneys’ and expert
`
`16
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 18 of 19
`
`68.
`
`Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`
`17
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06020-WHA Document 1 Filed 08/27/20 Page 19 of 19
`
`
`
`Dated: August 27, 2020
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/Lalli Venkatakrishnan
`Lalli Venkatakrishnan (Cal. Bar # 323747)
`CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
`1212 Broadway, Suite 800
`Oakland, CA 94612
`Tel: (510) 676-0348
`Email: lvenkat@biologicaldiversity.org
`
`Attorney for Plaintiffs Center for Biological
`Diversity and Center for Environmental Health
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND
`INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket