throbber
Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 1 of 40
`

`
`TODD KIM
`Assistant Attorney General
`SETH M. BARSKY, Section Chief
`MEREDITH L. FLAX, Assistant Section Chief
`COBY HOWELL, Senior Trial Attorney
`MICHAEL R. EITEL, Senior Trial Attorney
`U.S. Department of Justice
`Environment & Natural Resources Division
`Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
`1000 S.W. Third Avenue
`Portland, OR 97204
`Phone: (503) 727-1023
`Fax: (503) 727-1117
`Email: coby.howell@usdoj.gov
`
`Attorneys for Federal Defendants
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Oakland)
`
`
`
`CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL
`DIVERSITY, ET AL.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`HAALAND, ET AL.,
`
`
`
`Federal Defendants.
`
`
`Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206-JST
`FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’
`MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY
`REMAND; RESPONSE TO
`PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
`AND AUTHORITIES
`
`
`Date: TBD
`Time: TBD
`Place: Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor
`Judge: The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
`
`
`
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206

`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 2 of 40
`

`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, as soon as possible, Federal Defendants will
`
`move this Court for voluntary remand in the above-captioned case. This motion will
`
`be made before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar, United States District Judge, Oakland
`
`Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 94612.
`
`Federal Defendants move the Court for an order remanding, without vacatur,
`
`the following final rules: 84 Fed. Reg. 44753 (Aug. 27, 2019), 84 Fed. Reg. 45020
`
`(Aug. 27, 2019), and 84 Fed. Reg. 44976 (Aug. 27, 2019). Federal Defendants
`
`respectfully submit this motion in response to Plaintiffs’ motions for summary
`
`judgment.
`
`This motion is based on the accompanying Memorandum of Points and
`
`Authorities and the Third Declaration of Gary D. Frazer (“Third Frazer Decl.”) and
`
`Fourth Declaration of Samuel D. Rauch III (“Fourth Rauch Decl.”).
`
`
`
`Counsel for the parties have conferred on this motion. All Plaintiffs have
`
`indicated that they will oppose this motion. All Intervenor-Defendants have
`
`indicated that they will reserve their position until they have an opportunity to
`
`review the motion.
`
`Federal Defendants are filing this motion in all three related cases, but the
`
`motion and brief are substantively identical in each case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 3 of 40
`

`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`PAGE
`
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORTIES ................................................... 1
`
`INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1
`
`I. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND .......................................... 3
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`The Section 4 Revisions ................................................................................... 4
`
`The Section 4(d) Revisions ............................................................................... 9
`
`The Section 7(a)(2) Revisions ......................................................................... 12
`
`II.
`
`PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND...................................................................... 16
`
`A.
`
`Rule 12 Responsive Pleadings ....................................................................... 16
`
`B. Motions to Stay ............................................................................................... 16
`
`C. Motions for Summary Judgment ................................................................... 18
`
`STANDARD OF REVIEW .......................................................................................... 19
`
`I. THE COURT SHOULD REMAND THE 2019 ESA RULES WITHOUT
`
`VACATUR. ................................................................................................................... 20
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`Voluntary Remand is Appropriate. ............................................................... 20
`
`The Court Should Not Vacate the 2019 ESA Rules. ..................................... 26
`
`CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................ 30
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`i 
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 4 of 40
`

`
`CASES
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE 
`
`
`
`Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Allen,
`No. 04-1813-JO, 2009 WL 2015407 (D. Or. July 1, 2009) ...................................... 21
`
`
`Allied-Signal, Inc. v. U.S. Nuclear Regul. Comm'n,
`988 F.2d 146 (D.C. Cir. 1993) .............................................................................20, 28
`
`
`Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Haaland, 19-cv-06812 (N.D. Cal., Oct. 21, 2019) ........... 2
`
`ASSE Int’l v. Kerry,
`182 F. Supp. 3d 1059 (C.D. Cal. 2016) .................................................................... 21
`
`
`Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or.,
`515 U.S. 687 (1995) .................................................................................................... 4
`
`
`Cal. Cmtys. Against Toxics v. EPA,
`688 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2012) ......................................................................... 20, 22, 27
`
`
`Cent. Power & Light Co. v. United States,
`634 F.2d 137 (5th Cir. 1980) .................................................................................... 21
`
`
`Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland,
` 19-cv-5206 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2019) ....................................................................... 2
`
`California v. Haaland, 19-cv-6013 (N.D. Cal., Sept. 25, 2019) .................................. 2
`
`Cottonwood Env’t L. Ctr. v. Bernhardt,
`No. CV 18-12-BU-SEH, 2020 WL 7263551 (D. Mont. Dec. 10, 2020) .................... 21
`
`
`FCC v. Fox Television Stations,
`556 U.S. 502 (2009) .................................................................................................. 19
`
`
`Fed. Power Comm’n v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.,
`423 U.S. 326 (1976) .............................................................................................26, 27
`
`
`Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Lorion,
`470 U.S. 729 (1985) .................................................................................................. 26
`
`
`Ford Motor Co. v. Nat’l Lab. Rels. Bd.,
`305 U.S. 364 (1939) .............................................................................................20, 21
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`ii 
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 5 of 40
`

`
`
`Idaho Farm Bureau Fed’n v. Babbitt,
`58 F.3d 1392 (9th Cir. 1995) .................................................................................... 27
`
`
`In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking,
`No. C 20-04636 WHA, 2021 WL 4924844 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2021) .................22, 27
`
`
`Nat’l Cable & Telecomms. Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Servs.,
`545 U.S. 967 (2005) .................................................................................................. 20
`
`
`John v. Sec’y of the Interior,
`No. 3:14-CV-00247-LRH-VP, 2015 WL 505526 (D. Nev. Feb. 5, 2015) .................. 22
`
`
`Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.,
`398 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2005) .................................................................................. 30
`
`
`Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,
`463 U.S. 29 (1983) .................................................................................................... 19
`
`
`Neighbors Against Bison Slaughter v. Nat'l Park Serv.,
`No. CV 19-128-BLG-SPW, 2021 WL 717094 (D. Mont. Feb. 5, 2021) .................... 22
`
`
`Pascua Yaqui Tribe v. United States Env't Prot. Agency,
`No. CV-20-00266-TUC-RM, 2021 WL 3855977 (D. Ariz. Aug. 30, 2021) ............... 27
`
`
`Pollinator Stewardship Council v. EPA,
`806 F.3d 520 (9th Cir. 2015) .................................................................................... 28
`
`
`SKF USA, Inc. v. United States,
`254 F.3d 1022 (Fed. Cir. 2001) ...........................................................................20, 22
`
`
`Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs,
`282 F. Supp. 3d 91 (D.D.C. 2017) ............................................................................ 28
`
`
`Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or. v. Babbitt,
`1 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1993) .....................................................................................10, 11
`
`
`Trout Unlimited v. Lohn,
`559 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2009) .................................................................................... 11
`
`
`
`Nat. Res. Def. Council v. U.S. Dep’t. of Interior,
`275 F. Supp. 2d 1136 (C.D. Cal. 2002) .................................................................... 27
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`iii 
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 6 of 40
`

`
`Western Oil & Gas Ass’n v. EPA,
`633 F.2d 803 (9th Cir. 1980) .................................................................................... 27
`
`
`Weyerhaeuser Co. v. FWS,
`139 S. Ct. 361 (2018) .............................................................................................. 6, 9
`
`STATUTES 
`5 U.S.C. § 551(4)-(5) .................................................................................................... 29
`16 U.S.C. § 1531(b) ........................................................................................................ 3
`16 U.S.C. § 1532 ............................................................................................................ 8
`16 U.S.C. § 1532(5)(A) ................................................................................................... 5
`16 U.S.C. § 1532(20) .................................................................................................. 7, 8
`16 U.S.C. § 1533(a)(1) ................................................................................................ 5, 8
`16 U.S.C. § 1533(a)(3)(A) ........................................................................................5, 6, 8
`16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(1)(A) ............................................................................................... 7
`16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(2) .................................................................................................... 6
`16 U.S.C. § 1533(d) ...................................................................................................... 10
`16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2) .................................................................................................. 12
`16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(3)(A) ............................................................................................. 14
`16 U.S.C. § 1540(f) ......................................................................................................... 4
`16 U.S.C. § 1538(a) ...................................................................................................... 10
`16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1)(A)-(G) ...................................................................................... 10
`16 U.S.C. § 1604 .......................................................................................................... 16
`43 U.S.C. § 1712 .......................................................................................................... 16

`FEDERAL REGULATIONS
`
`50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a) (1978) .......................................................................................... 10
`50 C.F.R. § parts 17, 402, 424 ....................................................................................... 4
`50 C.F.R. § 17.31 .......................................................................................................... 11
`50 C.F.R. § 402............................................................................................................. 13
`50 C.F.R. § 402.13(a) ..............................................................................................13, 14
`50 C.F.R. § 402.13 ............................................................................................. 13, 14, 15
`50 C.F.R § 402.02 .............................................................................................. 14, 15, 25
`50 C.F.R § part 402 ....................................................................................................... 1
`50 C.F.R. § 402.14 ........................................................................................................ 14
`50 C.F.R. § 402.14(a) ................................................................................................... 13
`50 C.F.R. § 402.14(c) .................................................................................................... 15
`50 C.F.R. § 402.14(g) ................................................................................................... 14
`50 C.F.R. § 402.14(l) .................................................................................................... 15
`50 C.F.R. § 402.16 ...................................................................................................14, 16
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`iv 
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 7 of 40
`

`
`50 C.F.R. § 402.16(b) ................................................................................................... 16
`50 C.F.R. § 402.17 ...................................................................................................14, 25
`50 C.F.R. § 424.11 .......................................................................................................... 6
`50 C.F.R. § 424.11(b) (2018) .................................................................................... 7, 24
`50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d) ................................................................................................. 7, 8
`50 C.F.R. § 424.11(e) ..................................................................................................... 8
`50 C.F.R. § 424.12(a)(1)(ii) ............................................................................................ 8
`
`
`Other Authorities 
`45 Fed. Reg. 13010 (Feb. 27, 1980) ............................................................................... 1
`49 Fed. Reg. 38900 (Oct. 1, 1984) ................................................................................. 1
`51 Fed. Reg. 19926 (June 3, 1986) .............................................................................. 13
`70 Fed. Reg. 37160, 37195 (June 28, 2005) ................................................................ 11
`81 Fed. Reg. 7214 (Feb. 11, 2016) ................................................................................. 1
`81 Fed. Reg. 7414 (Feb. 11, 2016) ................................................................................. 1
`83 Fed. Reg. 35193 ........................................................................................................ 4
`83 Fed. Reg 35196. ........................................................................................................ 8
`84 Fed. Reg. 44753 (Aug. 27, 2019) ..................................................................... 1, 4, 12
`86 Fed. Reg. 7037 (Jan. 20, 2021) ........................................................................ passim
`81 Fed. Reg. 7414 (Feb. 11, 2016) ................................................................................. 1
`83 Fed. Reg. 35174 ............................................................................................. 4, 12, 14
`84 Fed. Reg. 44976 (Aug. 27, 2019) ................................................................. 1, 4, 6, 14
`84 Fed. Reg. 45020 (Aug. 27, 2019) ..................................................................... passim
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`v 
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 8 of 40
`

`
`
`
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORTIES
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`More than 30 years ago, the Secretaries of the Departments of the Interior
`
`and Commerce (“Secretaries”), acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
`
`(“FWS”) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) (collectively,
`
`“Services”) promulgated comprehensive regulations interpreting and implementing
`
`the Endangered Species Act (“ESA” or “Act”). 1 On August 27, 2019, in three
`
`separate rulemakings, the Services issued the currently at-issue revisions to the
`
`regulations implementing portions of Sections 4, 4(d), and 7(a)(2) of the ESA. See
`
`84 Fed. Reg. 45020 (“Section 4 Rule”); 84 Fed. Reg. 44753 (“Section 4(d) Rule”); 84
`
`Fed. Reg. 44976 (“Section 7(a)(2) Rule”). The three revised regulations became
`
`effective in late 2019.
`
`Seventeen States, the District of Columbia, and the City of New York (“State
`
`Plaintiffs”), the Center for Biological Diversity and other non-governmental
`
`organizations (“CBD Plaintiffs”), and the Animal Legal Defense Fund (“ALDF”)
`
`(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) challenge each of these revised regulations in three
`
`separate suits alleging violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),
`

`1 The Services periodically revised portions of the regulations, such as amendments
`to the Sections 4 and 7 regulations in 2016. See, e.g., 81 Fed. Reg. 7214 (Feb. 11,
`2016) (amending 50 C.F.R. Part 402); 81 Fed. Reg. 7414 (Feb. 11, 2016) (amending
`50 C.F.R. Part 424). But, in the main, the earlier regulations have remained the
`operative regulations for 30-plus years. See also, 45 Fed. Reg. 13010 (Feb. 27,
`1980); 49 Fed. Reg. 38900 (Oct. 1, 1984).
`
`
`1
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 9 of 40
`

`
`National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), and ESA.2 All three Plaintiffs
`
`generally contend they are harmed because the 2019 ESA Rules allegedly
`
`undermine the conservation purposes of the ESA.
`
`Pursuant to Executive Order 13990 signed by President Biden on January
`
`20, 2021 (titled “Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment
`
`and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis”), the White House directed the
`
`Services to evaluate and, where appropriate, revise or rescind environmental and
`
`public health-related regulations that issued during the prior four years that
`
`conflicted with national objectives set forth in the Order. 86 Fed. Reg. 7037 (Jan.
`
`20, 2021). In a publication accompanying that Executive Order, the White House
`
`specifically directed the Services to review the 2019 ESA Rules challenged in this
`
`case. As a result of the Services’ review of these regulations, on June 4, 2021, FWS
`
`announced its intent to rescind the Section 4(d) Rule and the Services announced
`
`their intent to revise the Section 4 and Section 7 Rules.
`
`Based in part on the Services’ intent to rescind and revise the 2019 ESA
`
`Rules, on August 13, 2021, Federal Defendants moved this Court for a stay of
`
`proceedings to allow the Services to complete their rulemaking processes in
`

`2 This Court has related the three cases: Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland,
`19-cv-5206 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2019); California v. Haaland, 19-cv-6013 (N.D. Cal.,
`Sept. 25, 2019); Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Haaland, 19-cv-06812 (N.D. Cal., Oct.
`21, 2019). Federal Defendants are filing an identical motion and memorandum in
`all three cases. For purposes of this memorandum, the cases are referred to
`collectively in the singular tense. The Court has also related California v. Haaland,
`21-cv-00440-JST (N.D. Cal.), which challenges the 2020 Critical Habitat Rules. The
`Court previously granted the parties’ stipulated stay of proceedings in that case.
`
`2
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 10 of 40
`

`
`accordance with the APA. The Court denied Federal Defendants’ motions on
`
`October 7, 2021, finding a possibility of harm to Plaintiffs from continued
`
`implementation of the 2019 ESA Rules. Soon after, Plaintiffs re-filed their motions
`
`for summary judgment.
`
`Because Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment, Defendants now move the
`
`Court to remand the 2019 ESA Rules without vacatur. This voluntary remand
`
`request responds to Plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment by addressing the
`
`proper relief the Court should grant in this case. The requested equitable relief is
`
`legally and factually warranted, narrowly tailored, and resolves Plaintiffs’ claims;
`
`thus, there is no need for the Court to reach the merits of the arguments in this
`
`case. As discussed below, the Court should grant Federal Defendants’ motion for
`
`remand and deny Plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`I.
`
`STATUTORY AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND
`
`Congress enacted the ESA in 1973 “to provide a means whereby the
`
`ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be
`
`conserved, to provide a program for the conservation of such endangered species
`
`and threatened species, and to take such steps as may be appropriate to achieve the
`
`purposes of [certain] treaties and conventions . . . .” 16 U.S.C. § 1531(b). To achieve
`
`these purposes, Congress set out broad procedural and substantive requirements in
`
`various sections of the Act and provided the Secretaries with rulemaking authority
`
`to implement those requirements. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(f); Babbitt v. Sweet Home
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`3
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 11 of 40
`

`
`Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or., 515 U.S. 687, 708 (1995) (“When it enacted the
`
`ESA, Congress delegated broad administrative and interpretive power to the
`
`Secretar[ies].”).
`
`For over 30 years, the Services have interpreted these broad procedural and
`
`substantive requirements principally through joint regulations. See, e.g., 50 C.F.R.
`
`parts 17, 402, 424. During those decades, the Services gained valuable experience
`
`in implementing the Act and their own regulations, and over those years issued
`
`guidance interpreting or clarifying the regulations to facilitate implementation of
`
`the Act.3 To update these regulations, in 2018 the Services issued three separate
`
`proposed rules addressing Sections 4(d), 4, and 7(a)(2) of the Act. 83 Fed. Reg.
`
`35174 (“Section 4(d) proposed rule”); 83 Fed. Reg. 35193 (“Section 4 proposed rule”);
`
`83 Fed. Reg. 35178 (“Section 7(a)(2) proposed rule”). The Services provided notice in
`
`the Federal Register and solicited public comment on the proposed rules. After
`
`considering and addressing these public comments, the Secretaries exercised their
`
`rulemaking authorities and, on August 27, 2019, issued a trio of final rules revising
`
`certain portions of the existing regulations. See 84 Fed. Reg. 45020; 84 Fed. Reg.
`
`44753; 84 Fed. Reg. 44976. The relevant statutory authorities and the revisions to
`
`50 C.F.R. parts 17, 402, and 424, are each addressed below.
`
`A. The Section 4 Revisions
`
`
`

`3 See, e.g., FWS, Laws and Policies, Regulations and Policies, available at
`https://www.fws.gov/endangered/laws-policies/regulations-and-policies.html (last
`visited Dec. 9, 2021) (identifying interpretive guidance and policies relating to
`application of Sections 4 and 7 of the ESA).
`
`4
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 12 of 40
`

`
`Under ESA Section 4, the Services “shall by regulation” determine “whether
`
`any species is an endangered species or a threatened species” after considering five
`
`statutory factors, the best scientific and commercial data available, and States’ and
`
`foreign governments’ efforts to protect the species. 16 U.S.C. § 1533(a)(1), (b)(1)(A).
`
`An “endangered species” is “any species which is in danger of extinction throughout
`
`all or a significant portion of its range.” Id. § 1532(6). A “threatened species” is one
`
`“which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
`
`throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” Id. § 1532(20). If a listed
`
`species no longer meets the definition of an endangered or threatened species, the
`
`Services shall remove the ESA’s protections from the species (delisting). If a species
`
`is delisted, the Services must monitor that species for at least five years. Id. §
`
`1533(g).
`
`Section 4 also generally directs the Services to designate critical habitat for
`
`any species listed as endangered or threatened “to the maximum extent prudent
`
`and determinable.” 16 U.S.C. § 1533(a)(3)(A). “Critical habitat” is defined in
`
`relevant part as:
`
`(i) the specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species, at
`the time it is listed . . . on which are found those physical or biological
`features (I) essential to the conservation of the species and . . . (ii) specific
`areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is
`listed . . . upon a determination by the Secretary that such areas are essential
`for the conservation of the species.
`
`16 U.S.C. § 1532(5)(A). The Services must designate critical habitat on the basis of
`
`the “best scientific data available and after taking into consideration the economic
`
`impact, the impact on national security, and any other relevant impact of specifying
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`5
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 13 of 40
`

`
`any particular area as critical habitat.” Id. § 1533(b)(2). The Services “may exclude
`
`any area from critical habitat if [they] determine[] that the benefits of such
`
`exclusion outweigh the benefits of specifying such area as part of the critical
`
`habitat, unless [they] determine[] . . . [failure to do so] will result in the extinction of
`
`the species concerned.” Id. A critical habitat designation does not directly limit or
`
`affect the conduct of non-federal actors. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. FWS, 139 S. Ct. 361,
`
`365-66 (2018).
`
`To aid in implementing these statutory duties, the Services jointly
`
`promulgated regulations setting forth the procedures for adding, removing, or
`
`reclassifying endangered or threatened species, 50 C.F.R. § 424.11, as well as the
`
`criteria for designating critical habitat for listed species, id. § 424.12. On July 25,
`
`2018, the Services proposed five general revisions to the listing and critical habitat
`
`regulations. These revisions entail: (1) the deletion of economic impact language;
`
`(2) the framework for discussing the foreseeable future; (3) factors to consider in
`
`delisting; (4) specific circumstances that support “not prudent” determinations for
`
`critical habitat; and (5) clarifications and revisions to the standards and process for
`
`designating critical habitat in unoccupied areas. 83 Fed. Reg. at 35194-99. The
`
`Services provided proposed regulatory text addressing each of these issues along
`
`with an explanation and solicited public comments on these as well as other
`
`potential areas for change. 83 Fed. Reg. at 35194.
`
`On August 27, 2019, the Services published the Section 4 final rule adopting
`
`many of their proposed revisions. 84 Fed. Reg. 45020. Among the regulatory
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`6
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 14 of 40
`

`
`changes, the Services revised the regulatory text governing the listing inquiry by
`
`removing the phrase “without reference to possible economic or other impacts of
`
`such determination” from 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(b) (2018). The Services explained that
`
`this change aligns the regulatory text with the statutory language of 16 U.S.C. §
`
`1533(b)(1)(A) and, in limited circumstances, allows the collection and presentation
`
`of economic information to the public.
`
`Second, the Services codified the framework for assessing “foreseeable future”
`
`as used in 50 C.F.R. § 424.11(d). A threatened species is statutorily defined as “any
`
`species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable
`
`future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” 16 U.S.C. § 1532(20)
`
`(emphasis added). Because there is no statutory definition of “foreseeable future,”
`
`the Services historically have determined its meaning on a case-by-case basis using
`
`guidance issued by the Department of the Interior Office of the Solicitor.4 The
`
`Services’ revision codifies the case-by-case approach and provides that, in
`
`undertaking this assessment, “[t]he term foreseeable future extends only so far into
`
`the future as the Services can reasonably determine that both the future threats
`
`and the species’ responses to those threats are likely” and that the Services “need
`
`not identify the foreseeable future in terms of a specific period of time.” 50 C.F.R. §
`
`424.11(d).
`

`4 See Department of the Interior, Office of Solicitor’s 2009 “M-opinion” on
`foreseeable future. 84 Fed. Reg. at 45026.
`
`7
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 15 of 40
`

`
`Third, the Services clarified the factors and criteria for delisting a species. 50
`
`C.F.R. § 424.11(e). As relevant here, the Services made clear that the standards for
`
`listing and delisting are the same, i.e., the five enumerated statutory factors in 16
`
`U.S.C. § 1533(a)(1). 83 Fed. Reg. at 35196. The Services also made a number of
`
`changes to address previous regulatory language—that species should be delisted
`
`when they no longer meet the definition of an endangered or threatened species. Id.
`
`For example, the term “recovery” was removed as one of the bases for delisting to
`
`convey that the analysis is based on whether the species meets the definition of an
`
`endangered or threatened species in 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (6), (20). 83 Fed. Reg. 35196.
`
`Fourth, with respect to designating critical habitat, the Services revised 50
`
`C.F.R. § 424.12(a)(1) to set forth a non-exhaustive list of circumstances in which the
`
`Services may find it “not prudent” to designate critical habitat, as contemplated in
`
`16 U.S.C. § 1533(a)(3)(A) (commonly referred to as “not prudent” determinations),
`
`83 Fed. Reg. at 35196-97. The Services also explained that they will make “not
`
`prudent” determinations clearer and more transparent by basing them on whether
`
`particular circumstances are present, rather than a determination of whether it is
`
`“beneficial” to a species. The Services thus removed the prior regulatory
`
`language—“would not be beneficial to the species”—from 50 C.F.R. §
`
`424.12(a)(1)(ii). 83 Fed. Reg. at 35197; 84 Fed. Reg. at 45040.
`
`Fifth, the Service revised the procedure and criteria for designating
`
`unoccupied critical habitat. 84 Fed. Reg. 45053. The revisions establish a sequence
`
`under which the Services “first evaluate areas occupied by the species” and then
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`8
`Motion for Voluntary Remand, Case. No. 4:19-cv-05206 
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05206-JST Document 146 Filed 12/10/21 Page 16 of 40
`

`
`turn to consideration of unoccupied habitat.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket