throbber
Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 1 of 18
`
`Adam M. Apton (State Bar No. 316506)
`LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
`388 Market Street, Suite 1300
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415-373-1671
`Facsimile: 212-363-7171
`Email: aapton@zlk.com
`
`Mark S. Reich (pro hac vice to be filed)
`Courtney E. Maccarone (pro hac vice to be filed)
`LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP
`55 Broadway, 10th Floor
`New York, NY 10006
`Telephone: 212-363-7500
`Facsimile: 212-363-7171
`Email: mreich@zlk.com
` cmaccarone@zlk.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`A.B., a minor, represented by her mother and
`next friend, AUDREY BURTON, individually
`and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-05683
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ROBLOX CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`(1) Violations of Cal. Bus. & Bus. Prof. Code §
`17200, et seq.
`(2) Violations of Cal. Civ. Code. § 1750, et seq.
`(3) Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and
`Fair Dealing
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 2 of 18
`
`
`
`Plaintiff A.B., a minor, represented by her mother and next friend, Audrey Burton
`(“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, makes the following
`allegations pursuant to the investigation of her counsel and based upon information and belief,
`except as to allegations specifically pertaining to herself and her counsel, which are based on
`personal knowledge, against defendant Roblox Corporation. (“Roblox” or “Defendant”).
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`1.
`Roblox is an online, multiplayer virtual creation platform where users play games
`that were created, along with its for-sale content, by other users. Roblox is predominantly used by
`children and saw a huge surge in usage from children during the COVID-19 pandemic. According
`to the company, as of April 2020, two-thirds of all children in the United States between ages 9
`and 12 used Roblox, and Roblox was played by a third of all Americans under the age of 16.1
`2.
`Roblox is initially free to join and download. Users can then purchase “Robux”
`which is the in-game currency that allows its users to make in-game purchases. Roblox’s revenue
`is dependent upon user-created content, boasting more than 8 million developers and more than 2
`million developers releasing monthly content from the Roblox Studio.2 Users purchase content
`from Roblox’s Avatar Shop, which is the user-to-user marketplace, to personalize their avatars and
`gaming experience. Roblox takes a commission from the user-to-user transaction and generates
`revenue from these sales.
`3.
`Roblox has the ability and retains discretion to delete content from its users’
`inventories, without notice, even after the items have been purchased. Roblox does not provide
`refunds for the content it removes and retains the money it earns as commissions through those
`sales.
`
`4.
`This is the result of Roblox’s lax control policies and practices – both by allowing
`potentially inappropriate or infringing products to be added to its Avatar Shop and sold to users,
`
`
`1 Olga Kharif, Kids Flock to Roblox for Parties and Playdates During Lockdown, BLOOMBERG
`(April 15, 2020), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-15/kids-flock-to-roblox-for-
`parties-and-playdates-during-lockdown (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`2 About Us, ROBLOX, https://corp.roblox.com/(last accessed July 2, 2021).
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 3 of 18
`
`
`
`as well as a failure to have a refund policy in place so that users can be reimbursed for content lost
`or deleted due to circumstances out of their control.
`5.
`In essence, Roblox makes content available for purchase on the Roblox Avatar
`Shop without adequately scrutinizing the content to ensure that it complies with Roblox’s policies.
`If Roblox later determines that the content violates its policies (e.g., includes a trademarked logo),
`Roblox will delete the content. Rather than performing adequate oversight before content is
`offered for sale in its marketplace, Roblox waits until items are purchased, collects commissions,
`and then deletes the content. Roblox keeps its commissions and associated revenue, yet refuses to
`refund its users for the deleted content.
`6.
`This “sell without regard to users” approach unfairly benefits Roblox because it
`allows Roblox to retain all monetary benefit after deleting content. Users, who are predominantly
`children, are left with nothing. Users are then forced make new purchases to replace their items,
`on which Roblox then collects additional commissions.
`7.
`There is no question that Roblox users are harmed as a result of Roblox’s practice
`of deleting content from its platform and refusing to refund its users for those purchases. In order
`to substantially reduce the amount of content deleted from the Roblox platform after users
`purchase the items and more robustly protect Roblox users, Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief,
`requiring Roblox to:
`(a) Implement changes to Roblox’s content moderation practices to require adequate oversight
`before content is offered for sale on the Avatar Shop;
`(b) Implement policies and practices to create additional oversight mechanisms for Roblox to
`monitor developers who regularly create content that ultimately gets deleted (i.e., extra
`oversight over “repeat offenders”);
`(c) Implement policies and practices to create additional oversight mechanisms to help prevent
`content that Roblox deletes from the Avatar Shop to be re-introduced and offered for sale
`again; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 2 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 4 of 18
`
`
`
`(d) Implement a comprehensive refund program to provide users with prospective refunds for
`content purchased in the Avatar Shop and deleted by Roblox (the “Proposed Injunctive
`Relief”).
`8.
`On June 2, 2021, Audrey Burton, acting on behalf of Plaintiff A.B. and all others
`similarly situated, sent a pre-suit demand to Roblox to immediately address its unlawful and unfair
`practice of deleting content purchased by users from its platform and failing to issue refunds for
`that content. In her letter, Ms. Burton requested the Proposed Injunctive Relief as outlined above.
`9.
`Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against Roblox on behalf of herself
`and other similarly situated Roblox users by asserting claims for violations of California’s Unfair
`Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.) (“UCL”); violations of California’s
`Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq.) (“CLRA”), and breach of the
`covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
`
`PARTIES
`10.
`Plaintiff A.B. is a resident of the state of Virginia.
`11.
`Plaintiff is a Roblox account holder who has used Roblox for the last two to three
`years. She spent approximately 200 dollars to purchase items from Roblox’s store, Avatar Shop
`and/or Game Shop only to then experience the deletion of many of the purchased items from her
`inventory. Since opening her current account in September of 2020, approximately seven shirts
`and fifteen pairs of pants have been deleted without refund. When Plaintiff purchased items, there
`was an expectation that the items would remain in her inventory. She would not have purchased
`the items had she known that they would later be deleted and she would not receive a refund for
`the content.
`12.
`Defendant Roblox Corporation is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place
`of business located at 970 Park Place, San Mateo, California 94403. Roblox regularly conducts
`business in this District and throughout the United States.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 3 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 5 of 18
`
`
`
`JURISDICTION, VENUE AND CHOICE OF LAW
`13.
`The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`§ 1332(d) because there are more than 100 Class members and the aggregate amount in
`controversy exceeds $5,000,000, exclusive of interest, fees, and costs, and at least one Class
`member is a citizen of a state different from Roblox.
`14.
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Roblox because it transacts business in
`this State, and because the tortious conduct alleged in this Complaint occurred in, was directed to,
`and/or emanated from this State.
`15.
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because Defendant is
`headquartered in this District, and a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to
`Plaintiff’s claims occurred in this District.
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`Roblox’s Online Platform
`16.
`Roblox is an online, multiplayer virtual creation platform that was founded in
`2006.3 Roblox is a platform where users play games created by other users, known as developers.
`The platform contains over 20 million games.4 Roblox is dependent upon user-created content,
`boasting more than 8 million developers and more than 2 million developers releasing monthly
`content from the Roblox Studio.5 Roblox has over 150 million monthly users,6 with more than
`half of the users being children under the age of 16. In April 2020, Roblox stated that “two-thirds
`of all U.S. kids between 9 and 12 years old use Roblox, and it’s played by a third of all Americans
`
`A.
`
`
`(March 11, 2021),
`talking about Roblox?, POLYGON,
`3 Why
`everyone
`is
`https://www.polygon.com/22326123/what-is-roblox-explainer-public-offering (last accessed July
`2, 2021).
`4 Id.
`5 About Us, ROBLOX, https://corp.roblox.com/ (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`6 Sarah Perez, Roblox jumps to over 150M monthly users, will pay out $250M to developers in
`2020,
`TECHCRUNCH.com
`(Jul.
`28,
`2020,
`10:23
`AM),
`https://techcrunch.com/2020/07/28/roblox-jumps-to-over-150m-monthly-users-will-pay-out-
`250m-to-developers-in-2020/ (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 6 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`under the age of 16.”7 Just three months later, Roblox reported to The Verge an increase from
`two-thirds to “over half of US kids and teens under the age of 16 play the game[.]”8
`17.
`The Roblox platform consists of the Roblox Client and the Roblox Studio. The
`Roblox Client is the system that allows users to “explore millions of immersive 3D experiences”
`with friends, via a customizable avatar.9 The Roblox Studio is the tool used by developers to
`create, release, and operate the “immersive 3D experiences” within the Roblox Client.10
`18.
`“Robux” is Roblox’s virtual, in-game currency that allows its users to make in-
`game purchases.11 Robux of various quantities are available for purchase through Roblox.com.
`Users can purchase 400 Robux for $4.99, 1,700 Robux for $19.99, or 10,000 Robux for $99.99.
`Prices for content on the Avatar Shop vary, with “Premium” items ranging from 20 Robux to 5,000
`Robux.12 Users that create the content and sell it to other users receive the in-game currency in
`return. Robux can then be converted into real-world currency through the Developer Exchange
`Program, known as DevEx.
`19.
`In addition to selling Robux in-game currency in exchange for real currency,
`Roblox makes a 30% commission from every user-to-user transaction in the Avatar Shop.13
`20.
`As such, Roblox benefits financially from every transaction made on its platform.
`
`
`7 Taylor Lyles, Over half of US kids are playing Roblox, and it’s about to host Fortnite-esque
`too,
`THE
`VERGE
`(Jul.
`21,
`2020,
`7:16pm),
`virtual
`parties
`https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/21/21333431/roblox-over-half-of-us-kids-playing-virtual-
`parties-fortnite (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`8 Id. See also Roblox: a parents’ guide, PARENT INFO (https://parentinfo.org/article/roblox-a-
`parents-guide (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`9 About Us, ROBLOX, https://corp.roblox.com/ (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`10 Roblox Support, Roblox Studio, ROBLOX, https://en.help.roblox.com/hc/en-
`us/articles/203313860-Roblox-Studio (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`11 “Roblox Privacy and Safety Checklist”, SWGfL.org.uk,
`https://swgfl.org.uk/assets/documents/roblox-checklist-new.pdf.
`12 Avatar Shop, ROBLOX, https://www.roblox.com/catalog/?Category=1&SortType=5 (last
`accessed July 2, 2021).
`13 Unified Marketplace Fee for Dev Products and Game Passes, DevForum.Roblox.com (Apr.
`2020), https://devforum.roblox.com/t/unified-marketplace-fee-for-dev-products-and-game-
`passes/507109; see also Upcoming Changes to Affiliate Fees & Catalog Item Configuration
`Options, DevForum.Roblox.com, https://devforum.roblox.com/t/upcoming-changes-to-affiliate-
`fees-catalog-item-configuration-options/1066940 (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 7 of 18
`
`
`
`B.
`
`Roblox’s Inadequate and Unfair Content-Control Practices
`21.
`The Avatar Shop, formerly known as the Catalog, is where users can purchase
`content created by developers, such as virtual clothing and other items for their avatar, including
`new heads, faces, gear, accessories, T-shirts, shirts, pants, bundles, and animation packs.
`22.
`Reasonable consumers expect that items purchased from the Avatar Shop will
`appear in their inventories and be available for use, forever.
`23.
`However, users have discovered that Roblox deletes content from their inventories
`without notice, and then refuses to provide refunds for that content. This is the result of Roblox’s
`lax control policies and practices over the placement and retention of content in its Avatar Shop.
`24.
`Roblox makes content available for purchase on the Roblox Avatar Shop without
`adequately scrutinizing the content to ensure that it complies with Roblox’s policies. If Roblox
`later determines that the content violates its policies (e.g., includes a trademarked logo), Roblox
`deletes the content. In other words, rather than performing adequate oversight before content is
`offered for sale in its marketplace, Roblox waits until items are purchased, collects commissions,
`and then deletes the content. Roblox then refuses to refund its users for the deleted content, as the
`company does not have a refund policy in place so that users can be reimbursed for content lost or
`deleted due to circumstances out of their control.
`25.
`This business practice and approach unfairly benefits Roblox because it allows
`Roblox to retain all monetary benefit after deleting content.
`26.
`Users, who are predominantly children, who have been impacted by this practice,
`are left without the purchased items, the money spent, or any means to recover either. Users are
`then faced with the decision to either accept the loss of the items without reimbursement, or forced
`make new purchases to replace their items. Roblox earns and keeps its commissions either way.
`27.
`The internet is replete with consumer complaints relating to Roblox’s unfair and
`unlawful policy of refusing to refund users for content that it made available for sale but then later
`deleted. Sample complaints have been reproduced below:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 6 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 8 of 18
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I literally bought shirts and pants and in like 5 days they got deleted. I feel
`like roblox is removing copied clothing but mine wasn't copied so uh-. I feel
`like roblox is doing the bad thing and should stop bc they ARENT EVEN
`REFUNDING US. What do you think about this?14
`
`I came back to Roblox after a while to see a lotta stuff in my inventory that
`I bought in the past be deleted off the catalog, without any form of
`compensation (such as Robux back) at no fault of my own. Who else thinks
`they should give back Robux to Players who bought now-deleted things off
`the Catalog?15
`
`Company refuses to help recover account items worth hundreds of dollars.
`This is a corporate plot intent on draining my wallet further with a brick
`wall and a U-Turn sign every time I try to contact them. I am reaching out
`to BBB because the corporation is sending scripted messages and
`unprofessionally handling this. Having a bad community is not a reason to
`have unhelpful responses to issues. The company policy says we can only
`be recompensated once ever if anything happens to our account and states
`that they expect our accounts to be safe, but I have experienced coercion
`and blackmail and there was no way to solve this issue. I sought help, and I
`got ignored. I wish for a response.16
`
`We should be able to get refunds for clothing we’ve bought that was
`moderated and deleted later. Earlier today, i went to the customize avatar
`page on roblox, and saw that one of the shirts i bought was deleted. So i
`observed it, and it was indeed deleted (the reason why it was deleted was
`that had been moderated, which it wasnt really that bad, since it was one of
`those Lightning Blue Adidas shirts). So, i decided to remove it from my
`inventory, but then after I did that, it got me thinking. When something you
`own thats been created by users(UGC Accessories, Shirts, Pants, etc) that
`has been deleted from the catalog, shouldn’t you be given the promt to get
`a refund after it has been deleted?17
`
`
`
`You purchase items virtually with hard earned money and they steal the
`items back so you have to repurchase them. This company rips off under
`age children and deceives them. I sent them this email and they replied with
`multiple auto responses. They don't care and don't want to come up with
`resolutions. I know there are hundreds of parents wanting to file a class
`action suit against them.18
`
`14 Yall why is roblox banning random shirts/pants, ROBLOX FORUM (January 11, 2021)
`https://robloxforum.com/threads/yall-why-is-roblox-banning-random-shirts-pants.62673/ (last
`accessed July 2, 2021).
`15 Players should be reimbursed for deleted items from Catalog…, REDDIT
`https://www.reddit.com/r/roblox/comments/j30x8b/players_should_be_reimbursed_for_deleted_
`items/ (last accessed July 2, 2021).
`16 Roblox Corporation, BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/san-
`mateo/profile/online-gaming/roblox-corporation-1116-316031/complaints (last accessed July 2,
`2021).
`17 Get a Refund if clothing item is Deleted, DEVELOPER (March 2020)
`https://devforum.roblox.com/t/get-a-refund-if-clothing-item-is-deleted/486384 (last accessed
`July 2, 2021).
`18 Roblox Corporation, BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/san-
`mateo/profile/online-gaming/roblox-corporation-1116-316031/complaints (last accessed July 2,
`2021).
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 9 of 18
`
`
`
`28.
`Consumers have also complained that it often appears that the deleted content is
`unconnected to any type of policy violation and that Roblox removes content arbitrarily. For
`example, one consumer wrote:
`
`
`
`C.
`
`That is complete BS. My daughter paid 84 Robux for pants and they were just
`deleted. There was nothing inappropriate about them to get them deleted. There
`should be a warning or refund system. Otherwise, they could just keep deleting
`everything for no reason to force people to buy more things.19
`
`Roblox Benefits From Nonexistent Content-Control Measures
`29.
`Roblox benefits from its failure to implement content-control procedures to prevent
`items, which must later be removed from its Avatar Shop, from being sold in the first instance.
`Roblox generates revenue from the sale of each item sold in the Avatar Shop, whether or not it
`ultimately gets deleted. As such, Roblox has no incentive to perform quality control to preclude
`such content from being offered for sale.
`30.
`Instead, Roblox waits until items are purchased, collects commissions, and then
`deletes the problematic content.
`31.
`As one user put it, “it’s basically the same as scamming (paying money for
`something and getting nothing in return as promised).”20
`32.
`To make matters worse, users and developers are able to reintroduce into the
`marketplace items that Roblox previously removed. As a result of Roblox’s inadequate control
`practices, Roblox continues to collect commissions from new sales of content that it previously
`removed for violating policies.
`33.
`Roblox does not remove developers who repeatedly have content removed for
`violations. These “repeat offender” developers continue to profit off of Roblox users, generate
`income for Roblox, and suffer no repercussions.
`
`
`19 Can you refund deleted items?, REDDIT
`https://www.reddit.com/r/roblox/comments/i0qenv/can_you_refund_deleted_items/ (last
`accessed July 2, 2021).
`20 The Roblox Clothing Moderation, ROBLOX FORUM (February 24, 2021),
`https://robloxforum.com/threads/the-roblox-clothing-moderation.66425/ (last accessed July 2,
`2021).
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 10 of 18
`
`
`34.
`Roblox users are harmed as a result of Roblox’s lack of policies and practices
`associated with the process by which content is initially uploaded to the Avatar Shop.
`35.
`Roblox benefits from its refusal to adopt any form of refund program to address the
`out-of-pocket losses incurred by its users. Instead, Roblox keeps its commissions, and refuses to
`refund its users for the deleted content.
`36.
`Roblox must be held accountable and ordered to take affirmative actions to protect
`its users through adequate oversight before content is offered for sale on the Avatar Shop. As such,
`Plaintiff seeks the Proposed Injunctive Relief.
`CLASS ALLEGATIONS
`37.
`Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of herself and as a class action pursuant to
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a), 23(b)(2), and 23(c)(4) on behalf of the following proposed
`Class:
`
`All individuals who purchased content on the Roblox platform (the “Class”).
`38.
`Specifically excluded from the Class are Roblox, its officers, directors, agents,
`trustees, parents, children, corporations, trusts, representatives, employees, principals, servants,
`partners, joint venturers or entities controlled by Roblox, and their heirs, successors, assigns, or
`other persons or entities related to or affiliated with Roblox and/or its officers and/or directors, the
`judge assigned to this action, and any member of the judge’s immediate family.
`39.
`Plaintiff reserves the right to amend the Class definition above if further
`investigation and/or discovery reveals that the Class should be expanded, narrowed, divided into
`subclasses, or otherwise modified in any way.
`40.
`This action may be certified as a class action under Federal Rules 23(a) because it
`satisfies the numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy requirements therein.
`Numerosity. Class members are so numerous and geographically dispersed that
`41.
`individual joinder of all Class members is impracticable. Plaintiff is informed and believes that
`there are millions of Class members throughout the country, making joinder impracticable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 9 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 11 of 18
`
`
`Common questions of law and fact. Common questions of law and fact exist as to
`42.
`all members of the Class. The common factual and legal questions include, but are not limited to,
`the following:
`
`(a) Whether Roblox’s practice of deleting content purchased by users from its
`platform and failing to issue refunds for that content is an unfair business practice
`under the UCL;
`(b) Whether Roblox’s practice of deleting content purchased by users from its
`platform and failing to issue refunds for that content is an unlawful business
`practice under the UCL;
`(c) Whether Roblox practice of deleting content purchased by users from its
`platform and failing to issue refunds for that content violates the CLRA;
`(d) Whether Roblox adequately and effectively reviews content for policy
`violations before content is offered for sale to its users;
`(e) Whether Roblox breached its covenant of good faith and fair dealing with
`Class members;
`(f) Whether Roblox’s misconduct alleged herein caused harm to Class
`members;
`(g) Whether Roblox has the capability to implement changes to Roblox’s content
`moderation practices to require adequate oversight before content is offered for sale on
`the Avatar Shop;
`(h) Whether Roblox has the capability to implement policies and practices to
`create additional oversight mechanisms for Roblox to monitor developers who
`regularly create content that ultimately gets deleted;
`(i) Whether Roblox has the capability to implement policies and practices to
`create additional oversight mechanisms to help prevent content that Roblox deletes
`from the Avatar Shop to be re-introduced and offered for sale again;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 10 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 12 of 18
`
`
`(j) Whether Class members are entitled to injunctive relief, including, but not
`limited to, the Proposed Injunctive Relief, to prevent future harm;
`(k)
` Whether Class members are entitled to declaratory relief to prevent future
`harm.
`Typicality. Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of the other Class members
`43.
`in that the claims of Plaintiff and other Class members are reasonably co-extensive, and arise from
`the same course of wrongful conduct.
`Adequacy of representation. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately protect the
`44.
`interests of the Class. Plaintiff has retained counsel highly experienced in complex consumer class
`action litigation, and Plaintiff intends to vigorously prosecute this action. Further, Plaintiff has no
`interests that are antagonistic to those of the other Class members.
`45.
`The Class may be certified under 23(b)(2) because Roblox has acted or refused to
`act on grounds generally applicable to the Class as a whole, thereby making appropriate final
`declaratory and injunctive relief with respect to Class members as a whole.
`46.
`Alternatively, at a minimum, particular common issues are appropriate for class
`treatment under Rule 23(c)(4).
`
`COUNT I
`Violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law
`On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Class
`Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.
`Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference herein all of the allegations set
`
`47.
`forth above.
`48.
`In accordance with the liberal application and construction of the Unfair
`Competition Law (“UCL”), application of the UCL to all Class members is appropriate, given that
`Roblox’s headquarters is in San Mateo, California; Roblox’s conduct as described herein
`originated from California; and the decisions regarding Roblox’s content moderation emanated
`from California.
`49.
`Roblox is a “person” as defined by Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17201.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 11 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 13 of 18
`
`
`50.
`Roblox violated Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. by engaging in unlawful
`and unfair business acts and practices.
`51.
`Roblox engaged in “unfair” business acts or practices by failing to adequately and
`effectively review content for policy violations before the content could be purchased, and
`thereafter deleting the content and refusing to issue refunds for the content purchased.
`52.
`Roblox’s practices constitute unfair business practices in violation of the UCL
`because, among other things, they are immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or
`substantially injurious to consumers and/or any utility of such practices is outweighed by the harm
`caused to consumers. Roblox’s practices violate the legislative policies of the underlying statutes
`alleged herein: namely, protecting consumers and preventing persons from being injured. Roblox’s
`practices caused substantial injury to Plaintiff and absent members of the Class and are not
`outweighed by any benefits, and Plaintiff and absent members of the Class could not have
`reasonably avoided their injuries.
`53.
`Roblox also engaged in “unlawful” business acts or practices under the UCL. “By
`proscribing any unlawful business practice, section 17200 borrows violations of other laws and
`treats them as unlawful practices that the UCL makes independently actionable.” Cel-Tech
`Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co., 20 Cal. 4th 163, 180 (1999)
`(citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
`54.
`Virtually any law or regulation – federal or state, statutory, or common law – can
`serve as a predicate for an UCL “unlawful” violation. Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 202 Cal. App.
`4th 1342, 1383 (2012).
`55.
`Roblox engaged in unlawful business acts or practices by violating state law,
`including the CLRA, Cal. Civ. Code § 1780 et seq., and common law, as alleged herein.
`56.
`As a direct and proximate result of Roblox’s unfair acts or business practices,
`Plaintiff and Class members have suffered injury in fact and lost money or property.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 12 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 14 of 18
`
`
`57.
`Plaintiff and Class members seek injunctive relief, declaratory relief; reasonable
`attorneys’ fees and costs under California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5; and other appropriate
`equitable relief.
`58.
`Specifically, Plaintiff and other Class members are entitled to injunctive relief
`against Roblox under the UCL, including, without limitation, directing Roblox to:
`59.
`Implement changes to Roblox’s content moderation practices to require adequate
`oversight before content is offered for sale on the Avatar Shop;
`60.
`Implement policies and practices to create additional oversight mechanisms for
`Roblox to monitor developers who regularly create content that ultimately gets deleted (i.e., extra
`oversight over “repeat offenders”);
`61.
`Implement policies and practices to create additional oversight mechanisms to help
`prevent content that Roblox deletes from the Avatar Shop to be re-introduced and offered for sale
`again; and
`62.
`Implement a comprehensive refund program to provide users with prospective
`refunds for content purchased in the Avatar Shop and deleted by Roblox.
`COUNT II
`Violations of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act
`(On Behalf of Plaintiff and the Class)
`Cal. Civ. Code. § 1750 et seq.
`Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference herein all of the allegations set
`
`63.
`forth above.
`64.
`The Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq. (“CLRA”), is
`a comprehensive statutory scheme that is to be liberally construed to protect consumers against
`unfair and deceptive business practices in connection with the conduct of businesses providing
`goods, property or services to consumers primarily for personal, family, or household use.
`65.
`In accordance with the liberal application and construction of the CLRA,
`application of the CLRA to all Class members is appropriate, given that Roblox’s headquarters is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`- 13 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-05683-WHO Document 1 Filed 07/23/21 Page 15 of 18
`
`
`in San Mateo, California; Roblox’s conduct as described herein originated from California; and
`the decisions regarding Roblox’s content moderation emanated from California.
`66.
`Ro

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket