`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`JERI CONNOR,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`QUORA, INC.,
`
`Case No. 18-cv-07597-BLF
`
`
`ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
`RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE
`PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE
`JUDGE
`
`Defendant.
`
`[Re: ECF 237]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Defendant Quora, Inc.’s motion for relief from a non-dispositive
`
`pretrial order of Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72-2. See
`
`Mot., ECF 237. Quora challenges Judge Cousins’s denial of its motion to compel a forensic
`
`examination of Plaintiff Jeri Connor’s electronic devices she used to access Quora on the bases
`
`that the decision was clearly erroneous and contrary to law. Id. 2. Quora argues that it addressed
`
`all the details Judge Cousins found lacking in its proposal and that his alleged lack of reasoning
`
`for the decision makes it contrary to law. Id. 3-4.
`
`A magistrate judge’s non-dispositive pretrial order may be modified or set aside if it is
`
`“clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). “[T]he magistrate’s factual
`
`determinations are reviewed for clear error, and the magistrate’s legal conclusions are reviewed to
`
`determine whether they are contrary to law.” Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 268 F.R.D. 344, 348 (N.D.
`
`Cal. 2010). Having reviewed the briefing and underlying order, the Court finds no clear error and
`
`that Judge Cousins’s legal conclusion was not contrary to law. Judge Cousins did not find Quora’s
`
`showing adequate enough to grant the motion, and he applied the correct legal standard. Quora
`
`cannot come to this court for a do-over on the factual determination.
`
`//
`
`//
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-cv-07597-BLF Document 238 Filed 05/19/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: May 19, 2021
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`