throbber
Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 1 of 35
`
`
`
`
`
`THE LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW J. BROWN
`ANDREW J. BROWN (160562)
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1490
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: 619/501-6550
`andrew@thebrownlawfirm.com
`
`BLOOD HURST & O’REARDON, LLP
`TIMOTHY G. BLOOD (149343)
`THOMAS J. O’REARDON II (247952)
`501 West Broadway, Suite 1490
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: 619/338-1100
`619/338-1101 (fax)
`tblood@bholaw.com
`toreardon@bholaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Case No.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`CLASS ACTION
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`JOHN COFFEE, MEI-LING MONTANEZ,
`and S.M., a minor by MEI-LING
`MONTANEZ, S.M.’s parent and guardian, on
`behalf of themselves and all others similarly
`situated,
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 2 of 35
`
`
`
`“We should be very reticent of creating an experience where the outcome can be
`
`influenced by spending money. Loot boxes play on all the mechanics of gambling except
`
`for the ability to get more money out in the end.”
`
`“Do we want to be like Las Vegas, with slot machines or do we want to be widely
`
`respected as creators of products that customers can trust?”
`
`“We have businesses that profit by doing their customers harm.”
`
`- Tim Sweeney, Co-Founder of Epic Games
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 3 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Plaintiffs JOHN COFFEE, MEI-LING MONTANEZ, and S.M., a minor by MEI-LING
`
`MONTANEZ, S.M.’s parent and legal guardian (“Plaintiffs”), file this Class Action Complaint
`
`against Google LLC (“Google” or “the Company”). Plaintiffs bring this action based upon personal
`
`knowledge of the facts pertaining to themselves, and on information and belief as to all other matters,
`
`by and through undersigned counsel.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`The California legislature has declared: “Gambling can become addictive and is not
`
`an activity to be promoted or legitimized as entertainment for children and families.” Cal. B & P
`
`Code § 19801(c). Through the games it sells and offers for free to consumers through its “Google
`
`10
`
`Play” store, Google engages in predatory practices enticing consumers, including children to engage
`
`11
`
`in gambling and similar addictive conduct in violation of this and other laws designed to protect
`
`12
`
`consumers and to prohibit such practices.
`
`13
`
`2.
`
`Not unlike Big Tobacco’s “Joe Camel” advertising campaign, Google relies on
`
`14
`
`creating addictive behaviors in kids to generate huge profits for the Company. Over the last four
`
`15
`
`years Defendant’s Google Play store games have brought in billions of dollars, even though the vast
`
`
`
`16
`
`majority of the games are free to download.
`
`17
`
`3.
`
`A large percentage of Google’s revenues from Google Play store games come from
`
`18
`
`the in-game purchases of what are known in the gaming industry as “loot boxes” or “loot crates.”
`
`19
`
`Dozens (if not hundreds) of Google Play store games rely on some form of Loot Box or similar
`
`20
`
`gambling mechanism to generate billions of dollars, much of it from kids.
`
`21
`
`4.
`
`Loot Boxes are purchased using real money, but are simply randomized chances
`
`22
`
`within the game to obtain important or better weapons, costumes or player appearance (called
`
`23
`
`“skins”), or some other in-game item or feature that is designed to enhance game-play. If obtained,
`
`24
`
`these weapons, skins, and other items can help the player advance in the game and enhance the game
`
`25
`
`playing experience. But buying a Loot Box is a gamble, because the player does not know what the
`
`26
`
`Loot Box actually contains until it is opened.
`
`27
`
`5.
`
`Unsurprisingly, the perceived best “loot” in the game is also the most difficult to
`
`28
`
`obtain, and least likely to be received via Loot Box. Conversely, most items in the Loot Boxes tend
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 4 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`to be “common” or undesirable to the player – either because it is easily obtained or because the
`
`player already possesses the item.
`
`6.
`
`Some of these specific high-demand items in the game can be so difficult (and costly)
`
`to obtain that a “gray market” has sprung up on the internet – websites where the game accounts
`
`and in some cases individual items can be (and are) bought and sold for real money outside of the
`
`game itself. Numerous websites have been created to broker these transactions, bringing buyer and
`
`seller together to sell these items and accounts, for real money outside of the game.
`
`7.
`
`Loot Boxes have all the hallmarks of a Las Vegas-style slot machine, including the
`
`psychological aspects to encourage and create addiction – especially among adolescents. Moreover,
`
`10
`
`under California law they constitute illegal “slot machines or devices” when played on a mobile
`
`11
`
`phone, tablet, computer, or other similar device. California Penal Code § 330(d) broadly defines an
`
`12
`
`unlawful “slot machine or device” as,
`
`
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`a machine, apparatus, or device that is adapted, or may readily be converted, for use
`in a way that, as a result of the insertion of any piece of money or coin or other object,
`or by any other means, the machine or device is caused to operate or may be operated,
`and by reason of any element of hazard or chance or of other outcome of operation
`unpredictable by him or her, the user may receive or become entitled to receive any
`piece of money, credit, allowance, or thing of value, or additional chance or right to
`use the slot machine or device, or any check, slug, token, or memorandum, whether
`of value or otherwise, which may be exchanged for any money, credit, allowance, or
`thing of value, or which may be given in trade, irrespective of whether it may, apart
`from any element of hazard or chance or unpredictable outcome of operation, also
`sell, deliver, or present some merchandise, indication of weight, entertainment, or
`other thing of value.
`
`21
`
`Cal. Pen. Code § 330(b)(d).
`
`22
`
`8.
`
`Governments, regulators, and psychologists all agree that Loot Boxes, like the ones
`
`23
`
`in games Defendant offers through its Google Play store, operate as gambling devices for those that
`
`24
`
`play the game, including minors, and that they create and reinforce addictive behaviors.
`
`25
`
`9.
`
`For instance, the Government of Belgium examined the use of Loot Boxes in various
`
`26
`
`videogames and determined that they violated that country’s gambling laws, specifically finding,
`
`27
`
`28
`
`The paid loot boxes in the examined games Overwatch, FIFA 18 and Counter-Strike:
`Global Offensive fit the description of a game of chance because all of the
`constitutive elements of gambling are present (game, wager, chance, win/loss).
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 5 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`10.
`
`Likewise, in September 2019 Great Britain Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and
`
`Sport Committee issued a report to Parliament determining that Loot Boxes constitute gambling and
`
`encourage addictive behavior, and recommending that the sale of Loot Boxes to children should be
`
`banned. Committee Chair Damian Collins MP said:
`
`Loot boxes are particularly lucrative for games companies but come at a high cost,
`particularly for problem gamblers, while exposing children to potential harm. Buying
`a loot box is playing a game of chance and it is high time the gambling laws caught
`up. We challenge the Government to explain why loot boxes should be exempt from
`the Gambling Act.
`
`11.
`
`Similarly, psychologists who have studied the issue agree that Loot Boxes correlate
`
`with problem gambling, especially among adolescents. For example, one such survey analysis of
`
`current studies concluded,
`
`[T]he findings are very consistent that there is an association between problem
`gambling and loot box buying among both adolescents and adults (and that the
`association may be even stronger among adolescents).
`
`12.
`
`Even Google implicitly concedes the Loot Boxes in its Google Play store games are
`
`a form of gambling. Like the California state lottery, Google requires its App Developers to disclose
`
`the “odds of winning” particular items in the Loot Boxes for the games it distributes. Google’s
`
`“Developer Program Policies” for App Developers states:
`
`Apps offering mechanisms to receive randomized virtual items from a purchase
`(i.e. "loot boxes") must clearly disclose the odds of receiving those items in advance
`of purchase.1
`
`13. While Google does not itself create these games and the Loot Box mechanism used
`
`to entice children to gamble, Google profits handsomely by 1) marketing, selling, and/or distributing
`
`the games to kids on Google products and through its Google Play store platform; 2) acting as the
`
`agent for the developer in selling the Loot Boxes; and 3) handling the money in all of the transactions
`
`– taking a 30% cut of all money spent by players before transferring the remainder to the developer.
`
`
`1
`https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy-print/. Google
`at
`Available
`apparently does not regulate the method of how those odds are disclosed, as they are frequently
`difficult to find or simply not available until the player has already decided to purchase the Loot
`Box.
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 6 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`14.
`
`Plaintiff John Coffee is a citizen of the State of California and a resident of Tehama
`
`County. Since at least 2018, Plaintiff has owned and played Final Fantasy Brave Exvius, a game
`
`marketed, sold and/or distributed by Defendant Google, and which he downloaded through the
`
`Google Play store on to his Android mobile device. In the course of playing Final Fantasy Brave
`
`Exvius and other games including War of the Visions: Final Fantasy Brave Exvius, Dragon Ball
`
`Legends, The Seven Deadly Sins: Grand Cross, Dragon Quest, Puzzles & Dragons, Dragon Ball Z
`
`Dokkan Battle, Brave Frontier, Arms of War, Mobius Final Fantasy, Final Fantasy Record Keeper,
`
`and Clash Royale, and as a result of Defendant’s conduct, Plaintiff has been induced to spend money
`
`10
`
`to purchase “Loot Boxes” in-game. Plaintiff Coffee continues to play Final Fantasy Brave Exvius
`
`11
`
`and other games offering Loot Boxes on his Android mobile device. Plaintiff Coffee estimates he
`
`12
`
`has spent in excess of $500 on in-game Loot Boxes in exchange for the random-chance possibility
`
`13
`
`of winning valuable items. Plaintiff Coffee still owns and plays Final Fantasy Brave Exvius as well
`
`14
`
`as other games downloaded through the Google Play store, which contain Loot Boxes. To the extent
`
`15
`
`he plays these games in the future, he will be subjected to Google’s predatory Loot Box scheme.
`
`
`
`16
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff Mei-Ling Montanez is the parent and legal guardian of S.M., a minor. She
`
`17
`
`is and at all relevant times was a citizen of the State of New York who resides in Brooklyn, New
`
`18
`
`York. Since at least 2019, her son S.M. has owned and played Dragon Ball Z Dokkan Battle
`
`19
`
`(“Dragon Ball Z”), a game sold and/or distributed by Defendant Google. In the course of playing
`
`20
`
`Dragon Ball Z and other games on Google-enabled devices, Plaintiff’s son S.M. has been induced
`
`21
`
`to spend his parents’ money and perhaps his own money to purchase “Loot Boxes” in-game.
`
`22
`
`16.
`
`Plaintiff S.M. is a minor. He is and at all relevant times was a citizen of the State of
`
`23
`
`New York who resides in Brooklyn. Since at least 2019, S.M. has owned and played Dragon Ball
`
`24
`
`Z, a game owned and published by Bandai Namco Entertainment. Dragon Ball Z was downloaded
`
`25
`
`by S.M. onto a Samsung smartphone device, which uses the Google Android operating system. S.M.
`
`26
`
`downloaded the game Dragon Ball Z from Google’s App Store called “Google Play” directly onto
`
`27
`
`the Google Android device in order to play it.
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 7 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`17.
`
`In the course of playing Dragon Ball Z, S.M. has been induced to spend his parents’
`
`money to purchase “Loot Boxes” in-game. In Dragon Ball Z, the Loot Box mechanism is called a
`
`“Summons,” which S.M. has purchased.
`
`18.
`
`S.M. played, and continues to play, Dragon Ball Z on the Samsung smartphone. Mei-
`
`Ling Montanez estimates S.M. has spent more than $100 on in-game purchases including Loot
`
`Boxes. The money spent on Loot Boxes was done in exchange for the random-chance possibility of
`
`winning valuable items in-game. S.M. used his parents’ credit card, which is on file with Google
`
`for its “Google Play” App Store, to purchase some of the Dragon Ball Z Loot Boxes. Mei-Ling
`
`Montanez is unsure but S.M. may also have made Loot Box purchases directly through their
`
`10
`
`smartphone network provider. S.M. still owns Dragon Ball Z and other Google-enabled games
`
`11
`
`which contain Loot Boxes. To the extent he plays these games in the future, he will be subjected to
`
`12
`
`Google’s predatory Loot Box scheme.
`
`13
`
`19.
`
`Defendant Google LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal
`
`14
`
`place of business and global headquarters at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View,
`
`15
`
`California, 94043. Google is a global technology company that specializes in internet-related
`
`
`
`16
`
`services and products. Google developed, owns and operates the Google Play store and Android
`
`17
`
`operating system.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`20.
`
`This Court has diversity jurisdiction over the claims asserted herein on behalf of a
`
`20
`
`nationwide class pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as amended in February 2005 by the Class Action
`
`21
`
`Fairness Act. Jurisdiction is proper because:
`
`22
`
`(a)
`
`The proposed class includes more than 100 members, and many of the named
`
`23
`
`plaintiffs and class members are citizens of states that are diverse from the state of Defendants’
`
`24
`
`citizenship, the amount in controversy in this class action exceeds five million dollars, exclusive of
`
`25
`
`interest and costs; and,
`
`26
`
`(b)
`
`Defendants have purposefully availed themselves of the privilege of
`
`27
`
`conducting business activities within the State of California, where Google has its principal place
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 8 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`of business; where its officers direct, control, and coordinate Google’s activities, and where Google
`
`engaged in the unlawful conduct alleged herein.
`
`21.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391, because a
`
`substantial part of the challenged conduct or omissions complained of herein occurred in this judicial
`
`district, and defendant caused harm to at least one of the named plaintiffs and numerous class
`
`members in this judicial district.
`
`INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
`
`22.
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-2(c) and (d), assignment to the San Jose Division is proper
`
`because a substantial part of the conduct which gives rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in this district
`
`10
`
`and specifically in Santa Clara County where Google is headquartered. Additionally, Google’s
`
`11
`
`Terms of Service contain a provision in favor of this Division.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
`
`The Google Play “App” Store
`
`23. Google creates and maintains a virtual online “store” where it makes available to
`
`15
`
`consumers various software applications (“Apps”) that are generally (but not exclusively) created
`
`
`
`16
`
`by other developers in an effort to increase revenues for the Company. These Apps are downloaded
`
`17
`
`by the consumer through Defendant’s “Google Play” App store, which itself appears as an App and
`
`18
`
`comes preloaded on mobile devices running on Google’s own Android operating system, including
`
`19
`
`the majority of Android smartphones and tablets.
`
`20
`
`24.
`
`As of March 2020, the Google Play store features over 2.9 million apps – 95% of
`
`21
`
`which are free to download. In 2019, Google Play users downloaded 84.3 billion mobile apps
`
`22
`
`globally.
`
`23
`
`25.
`
`The Google Play store is exclusively owned and operated by Google. It controls
`
`24
`
`which Apps are allowed in Google Play and maintains strict requirements and guidelines for App
`
`25
`
`developers who want to distribute an App via Google Play. Google Play contains hundreds of game
`
`26
`
`Apps which can be downloaded directly onto the Android device and played. Many of the Google
`
`27
`
`Play games are free, or very inexpensive to download.
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 9 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`26.
`
`Google makes money through two methods of generating revenue from each game
`
`that is downloaded through its Google Play store. First, if the developer charges a price for the game
`
`itself, Google will receive a portion of the purchase price (30% of the total). Second, after the game
`
`is purchased and downloaded, Google and the game developer entice the player to make in-app
`
`purchases. Google receives 30% of all of these in-app purchases as well.
`
`27.
`
`Google does not act as a traditional “retailer” by re-selling Apps in its Google Play
`
`store. Instead of buying Apps from the developers and reselling the Apps to customers at a profit,
`
`Google places the developers’ Apps on the virtual shelves of its Google Play store, sells them
`
`directly to Android smartphone and tablet customers, charges and collects the full price (set by the
`
`10
`
`developer) from customers, keeps its 30% of the customer payment from every sale or license, and
`
`11
`
`then remits the balance of the purchase price to the developer.
`
`12
`
`28.
`
`Payment for the Apps, including all in-game purchases after the game is downloaded
`
`13
`
`by the consumer (e.g., Loot Boxes), is controlled entirely by Google. Using Google Play’s payment
`
`14
`
`system, the payments go directly to Google and, after Google takes its 30% of the total, the
`
`15
`
`remainder is distributed to the App developer. Thus, for every Loot Box sale in a game downloaded
`
`
`
`16
`
`from the Google Play store, Google receives 30% of the revenue before the developer gets any
`
`17
`
`money at all.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`Loot Boxes Explained
`
`29.
`
`Google describes “Loot Boxes” as in-App mechanisms that provide users with
`
`20
`
`randomized virtual items from a purchase.
`
`21
`
`30.
`
`In their paper entitled “Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g. ‘loot
`
`22
`
`boxes’) and internet gaming disorder,” Professors Daniel King and Paul Delfabbro provided the
`
`23
`
`following description of a Loot Box:
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`A loot box refers to an in‐game reward system that can be purchased repeatedly
`with real money to obtain a random selection of virtual items. The low probability
`of obtaining a desired item means that the player will have to purchase an
`indeterminate number of loot boxes to obtain the item. Loot boxes resemble
`
`8
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 10 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`gambling slot machines because they require no player skill and have a randomly
`determined outcome (i.e. prize).2
`
`31.
`
`In the Google Play games, Loot Boxes can only be purchased by the consumer
`
`through the Google Play-linked Android device. Loot Boxes are purchased using real-world
`
`currency, usually through electronic means of entering a credit card number or using Google Play
`
`gift card.3
`
`32.
`
`For example, if the player is using an Android smartphone, while playing the game
`
`they can choose to make a purchase in the game itself. Doing so will take the player to a Google
`
`Play store screen which will show the game, the player’s Google Play account identifying
`
`information (such as an email address tied to the account), and confirm that the player wants to
`
`purchase the item by requiring the player to press the “Purchase” button.
`
`33.
`
`Upon pressing the “Purchase” button, the amount of the purchase is immediately
`
`charged by Google to the credit card number on file with the Google Play store. There is no
`
`additional confirmation of any kind. A minor can accomplish the purchase without parental consent,
`
`or even parental knowledge.
`
`34.
`
`To further entice consumers to spend real money on Loot Boxes, many of the games
`
`use a “virtual” money system within the game. That is, instead of buying Loot Boxes directly for a
`
`set dollar amount, the player must first purchase the in-game currency, which is then used to
`
`purchase Loot Boxes. In-game currencies frequently take the form of expensive-sounding items like
`
`“gems” or “gold coins” so the player feels they are getting something of value for their money.
`
`35.
`
`For example, in Mario Kart Tour the player is required to purchase “Rubies,” virtual
`
`items that cost real money and appear as large red gems (i.e. each one looks like a ruby). Rubies are
`
`then used to purchase a “Pipe” which is the version of the Loot Box style gambling mechanism in
`
`that game. In Final Fantasy Brave Exvius, players spend money to purchase “Lapis Crystals.” In
`
`
`2
`King, Daniel and Delfabbro, Paul H., “Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g.
`‘loot boxes’) and internet gaming disorder,” Addiction, 2018.
`
`3
`In some games, a Loot Box can also be “earned” by playing the game for a period of time
`or achieving some in-game goal (such as “experience level”).
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 11 of 35
`
`
`
`Brawl Stars, kids are encouraged to spend money to purchase in-game “gems.” In Roblox, the player
`
`spends money to purchase “Robux.”
`
`36.
`
`This intermediate level of virtual currency is designed to “disconnect” the player
`
`from the concern that he is gambling with real money. According to the Brussels Gaming
`
`Commission:
`
`The use of points (coins) and especially their size are psychologically very
`sophisticated and aimed at creating a personal reality which is then disconnected
`from the real world. FIFA 18 teaches players to think in FUT currency and FIFA
`coins. . . .. In Overwatch and Star Wars Battlefront II, the value of real money is
`also fully disconnected from the value of the in-game currency, causing players
`to lose contact with the real value.
`
`37.
`
`The Loot Box mechanism relies heavily on the psychology of gambling – doing
`
`everything possible to build up the player’s hoped-for win, tension, and excitement. For example,
`
`in many games opening the Loot Box coincides with triumphant music, the Loot Box itself bursting
`
`open with bright lights and colors. Yet this colorful animated system more often than not gives the
`
`player disappointing items, and rarely does the player get exactly the item he wanted.
`
`38.
`
`These Loot Boxes are designed to create a slot machine effect, where even when a
`
`player is not receiving the desired result – which happens frequently – there still exists a belief and
`
`hope that the next Loot Box will contain the desired item(s). This is further reinforced when viewing
`
`favorable results from other players opening Loot Boxes.4
`
`39.
`
`One researcher described the physical experience invoked by this Loot Box
`
`mechanism:
`
`Research by Kim (1998) found that waiting for the outcome of a gamble can activate
`the brain’s chemical reward system, releasing endorphins that create pleasure. In a
`gaming context, think of someone who really wants the Pharah Anubis skin in
`Overwatch. They buy five loot boxes and get excited during the big flashy box-
`opening animation. This excitement happens five times in a short space of time, with
`five flashy box-opening animations that are almost an event in itself.
`
`
`4
`There are thousands of videos on YouTube.com of gamers opening Loot Boxes in many,
`many different games. See, e.g., video of opening FIFA Ultimate Team packs with over 14 million
`views at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX0OZtaQ_kQ.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 12 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`40.
`
`Commenting on the Loot Box mechanism incorporated into videogames like the ones
`
`at issue here, Hawaiian congressman Chris Lee noted that Loot Boxes “are specifically designed to
`
`exploit and manipulate the addictive nature of human psychology.”
`
`41.
`
`Loot Boxes can contain numerous items, and the contents are ranked by order of
`
`probability with terms such as: “Common,” “Rare,” “Epic,” and “Legendary.” According to
`
`Google’s Developer Program Policies, each game developer must somewhere publish the odds of
`
`winning a desirable item in any given Loot Box. See https://play.google.com/about/developer-
`
`content-policy-print/ (“Apps offering mechanisms to receive randomized virtual items from a
`
`purchase (i.e. ‘loot boxes’) must clearly disclose the odds of receiving those items in advance of
`
`10
`
`purchase.”). But, as Google knows, publication of the odds of winning do not deter slot machine
`
`11
`
`12
`
`users, much less gamers including children who are unlikely to understand them.5
`
`42.
`
`Especially rare Loot Box items often come with long odds. For example, a
`
`13
`
`“Legendary” Brawler in Brawl Stars has approximately 0.30% probability of appearing in any
`
`14
`
`particular “Brawl Box.” Although there is no guarantee, obtaining a “Legendary” Brawler in this
`
`15
`
`game can mean buying hundreds of Loot Boxes at a cost of $100 or more, based on these
`
`
`
`16
`
`17
`
`probabilities.6
`
`43.
`
`Through its Google Play store, Google sells and distributes dozens of games that
`
`18
`
`bring in hundreds of millions of dollars every year through the Loot Box gambling mechanism.
`
`19
`
`Below are six popular examples.
`
`20
`
`21
`
`Example 1: Mario Kart Tour
`
`44. Mario Kart Tour is a wildly popular and “free” animated kart-racing game released
`
`22
`
`by Nintendo in September 2019. Google gave it an “E” for “Everyone” age rating. Across the
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`5
`See, e.g., Score Family Fun Ctr. v. County of San Diego, 225 Cal. App. 3d 1217, 1221 (1990)
`(rejecting the argument that the ability to calculate odds meant a virtual casino game was not illegal
`gambling: “this [odds] calculation does not predict, to the individual player, whether his particular
`ticket will win”).
`
`6
`The probability of receiving a specific item from a Loot Box is referred to as the “drop rate.”
`Each Brawl Box provides 3 random draws, and each random draw has the same drop rate of
`approximately 0.1%.
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 13 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Google Play store and Apple App Store, Mario Kart Tour was downloaded more than 123 million
`
`times during its first month, generating $37.4 million in player in-game spending during that time.
`
`As of March 2020, Mario Kart Tour has been the number one app by overall downloads in 65
`
`countries on Google Play. The console version of the game is banned in Belgium because of its Loot
`
`Boxes. In Mario Kart Tour, the Loot Box mechanism is called a “Pipe,” which is a Pipe that shoots
`
`out a random Driver, Kart or Glider which each have a level of rarity.
`
`45.
`
`“Rubies” are the main premium currency in the game. “Pipes” in the game are
`
`purchased with “rubies.” Rubies, in turn, are purchased with money, in odd lots and on a sliding
`
`scale. For example, the player can purchase 3 Rubies for $1.99 ($0.66 per Ruby), 23 Rubies for
`
`10
`
`$12.99 ($0.56 per Ruby), or 135 Rubies for $69.99 ($0.52 per Ruby). They can also be earned in
`
`11
`
`limited amounts through game play.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`46.
`
`By spending Rubies, the player can use the “Pipe” to unlock new and better racers
`
`and karts. Pipes can shoot out a new driver, kart or glider, all of which have their own rarities.7 For
`
`14
`
`example, and depending on the Pipe, each Pipe contains a determined amount of “Normal,” “Super,”
`
`15
`
`and “High-End” items, all of which are chosen randomly within their class and rarity, plus a featured
`
`
`
`16
`
`driver, kart and glider. The items are not ordered, so each item can be potentially found in any
`
`17
`
`placement within the pipe. Of course, it is also possible – even likely – that a player obtains an item
`
`18
`
`from a Pipe that already has been obtained or that is simply not desirable. Below is a screenshot of
`
`19
`
`a player “opening” a “Pipe:”
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`Players can only view the odds of winning from each “drop” by tapping the “Details” button
`right before they open the pipe in the game.
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 14 of 35
`
`47.
`
`According to one video game critic who played the beta version of the game upon
`
`
`
`16
`
`its release to the public in September 2019, the Loot Box mechanics of the game are designed to
`
`17
`
`hook children into spending money on the game:
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Mario Kart Tour locks its racers, karts and gliders behind a randomized, loot box
`system, where if you spend a couple of rubies you can get a green Mario pipe to fire
`out some new item, maybe one of those super rare characters you’ve been wanting
`or maybe that glider you need to get five stars on that same clone of the same course
`you’ve raced on five times already. There isn’t even a character I particularly want
`here, and yet I keep pulling this thing down and reveling in its “surprise mechanic”
`of an animation, hoping that whatever emerges from that glowing white ball will give
`me some sort of peace. Spoilers! It won’t.
`
`And this is the beating heart of Mario Kart Tour, the reason that Nintendo turned its
`game into a morass of currencies, unlocks, XP bars and [loot box] mechanics. The
`reason is that they work: they give us a little dopamine drip in our brains that the
`developer can parcel out to push us towards buying rubies on our own rather than
`“earning” them by grinding through what is bound to be an endless series of samey
`races. All it needs to do is give you a few rewards for free before you’re hooked into
`that glorious feeling of pulling that pipe back: it’s why loot boxes in so many games
`have such elaborate animations and detailed sound effects: those loot boxes are the
`heart of the experience, and they need to hit your animal brain as hard as they can.
`And it works in Mario Kart Tour as well as any. I opened up the game to take a
`
`
`
`
`
`00164916
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-03901 Document 1 Filed 06/12/20 Page 15 of 35
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`screenshot for this article and played a few races, throwing a few more arbitrary stars
`onto my totals.
`
`I haven’t spent any money on Mario Kart Tour yet, and I don’t plan on doing so. I
`can hold out until Shadowkeep for Destiny 2 launches, opening up a much broader
`and more satisfying dopamine source. But oth

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket