throbber
Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 1 of 79
`
`
`
`
`
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`SONAL N. MEHTA (SBN 222086)
` Sonal.Mehta@wilmerhale.com
`2600 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`Palo Alto, California 94306
`Telephone: (650) 858-6000
`DAVID Z. GRINGER (pro hac vice)
` David.Gringer@wilmerhale.com
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich Street
`New York, New York 10007
`Telephone: (212) 230-8800
`ARI HOLTZBLATT (pro hac vice)
` Ari.Holtzblatt@wilmerhale.com
`MOLLY M. JENNINGS (pro hac vice)
` Molly.Jennings@wilmerhale.com
`1875 Pennsylvania Ave NW
`Washington, DC 20006
`Telephone: (202) 663-6000
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`MAXIMILIAN KLEIN, et al., on behalf of
`themselves and all others similarly situated,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`META PLATFORMS, INC., a Delaware
`Corporation headquartered in California,
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`DEFENDANT META PLATFORMS,
`INC.’S ANSWER TO THE FIRST
`AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION
`COMPLAINT
`
`Judge: Hon. James Donato
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 2 of 79
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) answers Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated
`Advertiser Class Action Complaint as follows:
`Except as otherwise expressly stated below, Meta denies each and every allegation
`contained in the Complaint. Meta states that the headings, sub-headings, and footnotes throughout
`the Complaint do not constitute well-pled allegations of fact and therefore require no response. To
`the extent a response is required, Meta denies the allegations in the headings, sub-headings, and
`footnotes in the Complaint, except as otherwise stated. Meta reserves the right to seek to amend
`and/or supplement its Answer as may be necessary.
`ANSWERS TO SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS
`Meta admits that Jessyca Frederick, Mark Young, 406 Property Services, PLLC,
`1.
`Mark Berney, and Katherine Looper purchased advertising from Meta. Meta lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about whether advertising purchases by Jessyca Frederick
`were made on behalf of Affilious, Inc. Meta avers that Plaintiff Joshua Jeon voluntarily dismissed
`his claims on August 29, 2022. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 1.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 2.
`2.
`3.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 3.
`4.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 4.
`5.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 5.
`6.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 6.
`7.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 7.
`8.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 8.
`9.
`Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 9.
`10. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 10.
`11. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 11.
`12. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 12.
`13. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 13.
`14. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 14.
`15. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 15.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`1
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 3 of 79
`
`
`
`16. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 16.
`To the extent Paragraph 17 refers to an agreement between Meta and Google, Meta
`17.
`respectfully refers the Court to that agreement, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate
`statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 17.
`18. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 18.
`19. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 19.
`20. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 20.
`21. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 21.
`22. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 22.
`23. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 23.
`24. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 24, including whether Jessyca Frederick’s advertising purchases were
`made on behalf of Affilious, Inc., and on that basis denies the allegations.
`25. Meta admits that Jessyca Frederick purchased advertisements at various times on
`Facebook between April 4, 2009 and August 2017. Meta lacks knowledge or information
`sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 25, and on that
`basis denies the allegations.
`26. Meta admits that Mark Young purchased advertisements at various times on
`Facebook between June 2017 and April 2019. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
`form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 26, and on that basis denies
`the allegations.
`27. Meta avers that Plaintiff Joshua Jeon voluntarily dismissed his claims on August
`29, 2022, and therefore, no response is required.
`28. Meta admits that 406 Property Services, PLLC purchased advertisements at various
`times on Facebook between June 8, 2017 and October 20, 2017. Meta lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`28, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`2
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 4 of 79
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`29. Meta admits that Mark Berney purchased advertisements at various times on
`Facebook between 2016 and December 2018. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
`form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 29, and on that basis denies
`the allegations.
`30. Meta admits that Katherine Looper purchased advertisements at various times on
`Facebook between 2013 and March 2020. Meta denies that Reality House West is “Looper’s
`nonprofit organization.” Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about
`the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 30, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`31. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 31.
`32. Meta admits the allegations in Paragraph 32.
`33. Meta admits that it was founded by Mark Zuckerberg in 2004. Meta further admits
`that it offers a suite of products to billions of users around the world. Meta further admits that it
`earns revenues from delivering ads to users. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph
`33.
`
`To the extent Paragraph 34 refers to Meta’s public securities filings, Meta
`34.
`respectfully refers the Court to those filings, which speak for themselves, for a complete and
`accurate statement of their contents. Meta admits that its services include the Facebook
`application, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. Meta further admits that the Facebook
`application is a web-based and mobile service that, among other things, allows people to connect,
`share, discover, and communicate. Meta further admits that the Facebook application has several
`features that facilitate these connections, including News Feed. Meta further admits that Instagram
`is a mobile and web-based application that allows users to share photos, videos, and messages and
`that Meta acquired Instagram in 2012. Meta further admits that Messenger is a messaging
`application available on desktops and a variety of mobile platforms that allows users to share
`content and experiences by sending messages, photos, and videos. Meta further admits that
`WhatsApp is a messaging application used by individuals and businesses. Meta further admits
`that it acquired WhatsApp in 2014. Meta admits that Oculus is a hardware, software, and
`developer ecosystem that allows people around the world to come together through Meta’s Oculus
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`3
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 5 of 79
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`augmented reality and virtual reality. Meta further admits that it acquired Oculus in 2014. Meta
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 34.
`35. Meta admits that its revenue as of year-end 2019 was $70.70 billion, up 27% from
`the previous year, with net income from operations of $23.99 billion. Meta further admits that it
`maintained $54.86 billion in cash and cash-equivalent securities as of year-end 2019. Meta further
`admits that it employed 44,942 people around the world at the end of 2019, up 26% from the
`previous year. Meta further admits that its revenue as of year-end 2020 was $85.97 billion, a 22%
`increase from the previous year, with net income from operations of $32.67 billion. Meta further
`admits that it maintained $61.95 billion in cash and cash-equivalent securities as of year-end 2020.
`Meta further admits that it employed 58,604 people at the end of 2020, up 30% from the previous
`year. Meta further admits that it earned $117.93 billion in revenue in 2021. Meta further admits
`that it earned $114.93 billion in revenue from advertising in 2021. Meta further admits that it
`earned $46.753 billion in income from operations in 2021. Meta further admits that it earned
`$56.95 billion in income from operations of its Family of Apps in 2021. Meta further admits that
`its net income from operations was $39.37 billion in 2021. Meta otherwise denies the allegations
`in Paragraph 35.
`36. Meta admits that it reported to investors that on average it had 1.66 billion daily
`active users of Facebook for the 2019 fiscal year, up 9% from the previous year, and 2.50 billion
`monthly active users, up 8% from the previous year. Meta further admits that it had 2.26 billion
`daily active people who used one or more of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and/or WhatsApp,
`up 11% from the previous year, and 2.89 billion monthly active people, up 9% from the previous
`year. Meta further admits that it reported to investors that on average it had 1.84 billion daily
`active users of Facebook for the 2020 fiscal year, up 11% from the previous year, and 2.80 billion
`monthly active users, up 12% from the previous year. Meta further admits that it reported to
`investors that on average it had 2.60 billion daily active people who used one or more of Facebook,
`Instagram, Messenger, and/or WhatsApp, up 15% from the previous year. Meta otherwise denies
`the allegations in Paragraph 36.
`Paragraph 37 includes legal conclusions to which no answer is necessary.
`37.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`4
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 6 of 79
`
`
`
`Paragraph 38 includes legal conclusions to which no answer is necessary.
`38.
`Paragraph 39 includes legal conclusions to which no answer is necessary. To the
`39.
`extent a response is required, for purposes of the current action, Meta does not contest that venue
`in this district is proper.
`Paragraph 40 includes legal conclusions to which no answer is necessary. To the
`40.
`extent a response is required, for purposes of the current action, Meta does not contest that this
`Court has personal jurisdiction over Meta and that Meta transacts business in this district.
`41. Meta admits the allegations in Paragraph 41.
`42. Meta admits that it was founded by Mark Zuckerberg in 2004, that it rose to
`prominence in the face of fierce competition, and that today, it is used by people in the United
`States and worldwide. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 42.
`43. Meta admits that it was more successful than some of its rivals between 2004 and
`2010. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 43.
`44. Meta admits that Myspace was a competitor of Facebook. Meta lacks knowledge
`or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`44, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`To the extent Paragraph 45 refers to a public report, Meta respectfully refers the
`45.
`Court to that report, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its contents.
`Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining
`allegations in Paragraph 45, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`46. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 46, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`47. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 47, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`To the extent Paragraph 48 refers to reporting by Adweek, Meta respectfully refers
`48.
`the Court to that reporting, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its
`contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 48.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`5
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 7 of 79
`
`
`
`Year.
`
`49. Meta admits that Time magazine named Mr. Zuckerberg as its 2010 Person of the
`
`To the extent Paragraph 50 refers to a Time magazine article, Meta respectfully
`50.
`refers the Court to that magazine article, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate
`statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 50.
`51. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 51.
`52. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 52.
`53. Meta admits that it delivers ads to certain users. Meta otherwise denies the
`allegations in Paragraph 53.
`54. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 54.
`55. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 55.
`56. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in the second sentence of Paragraph 56, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 56.
`57. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 57.
`58. Meta admits that it delivers ads to certain users. To the extent Paragraph 58 refers
`to public statements from Meta, Meta respectfully refers the Court to those statements, which
`speak for themselves, for a complete and accurate statement of their contents. Meta otherwise
`denies the allegations in Paragraph 58.
`59. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 59.
`60. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 60.
`To the extent Paragraph 61 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`61.
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 61.
`62. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 62.
`63. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 63.
`64. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 64.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`6
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 8 of 79
`
`
`
`To the extent Paragraph 65 refers to a public report, Meta respectfully refers the
`65.
`Court to that report, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its contents.
`Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 65.
`To the extent Paragraph 66 refers to a public report, Meta respectfully refers the
`66.
`Court to that report, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its contents.
`Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 66.
`67. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 67.
`68. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 68.
`69. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 69, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`70. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 70, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`71. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 71, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`72. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 72, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`73. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 73, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`74. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 74, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`75. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 75, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`76. Meta admits that Google released Google+ in 2011. Meta lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`76, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`77. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 77, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`7
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 9 of 79
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`78. Meta denies that a “DTBE” protects Facebook. Meta lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`78, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`79. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 79, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`80. Meta denies the allegations in the last sentence of Paragraph 80. Meta lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations
`in Paragraph 80, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`81. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 81.
`82. Meta admits that Apple launched Apple iPhone in 2007. Meta otherwise denies the
`allegations in Paragraph 82.
`83. Meta admits that Apple released the Apple iPhone 3G in 2008. Meta lacks
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations
`in Paragraph 83, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`84. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 84, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`To the extent Paragraph 85 refers to a Pew Research survey, Meta respectfully
`85.
`refers the Court to that Pew Research survey, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate
`statement of its contents. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about
`the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 85, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`To the extent Paragraph 86 refers to a Nielsen survey, Meta respectfully refers the
`86.
`Court to that Nielsen survey, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its
`contents. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 86, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`To the extent Paragraph 87 refers to a Nielsen survey, Meta respectfully refers the
`87.
`Court to that Nielsen survey, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its
`contents. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 87, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`8
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 10 of 79
`
`
`
`88. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in Paragraph 88, and on that basis denies the allegations.
`To the extent Paragraph 89 refers to an article in Wired, Meta respectfully refers
`89.
`the Court to that Wired article, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its
`contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 89.
`To the extent Paragraph 90 refers to a Morgan Stanley analysis, Meta respectfully
`90.
`refers the Court to that Morgan Stanley analysis, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 90.
`91. Meta admits that the Facebook mobile app is free to download. To the extent
`Paragraph 91 refers to a public report, Meta respectfully refers the Court to that report, which
`speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its contents. Meta lacks knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`91, and on that basis denies the allegations
`92. Meta admits that it introduced its “Timeline” in 2011. Meta otherwise denies the
`allegations in Paragraph 92.
`93. Meta admits that its mobile application was initially built on HTML5 technology.
`To the extent Paragraph 93 refers to public statements, Meta respectfully refers the Court to those
`public statements, which speak for themselves, for a complete and accurate statement of their
`contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 93.
`To the extent Paragraph 94 refers to public statements, Meta respectfully refers the
`94.
`Court to those public statements, which speak for themselves, for a complete and accurate
`statement of their contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 94.
`95. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 95.
`96. Meta admits that it held its initial public offering on May 18, 2012. To the extent
`Paragraph 96 refers to public securities filings, Meta respectfully refers the Court to those public
`securities filings, which speak for themselves, for a complete and accurate statement of their
`contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 96.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`9
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 11 of 79
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`97. Meta admits that it competes with other mobile applications. Meta otherwise denies
`the allegations in Paragraph 97.
`98. Meta admits that its “Open Graph” provided a set of tools to developers. Meta
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 98.
`To the extent Paragraph 99 refers to public securities filings, Meta respectfully
`99.
`refers the Court to those public securities filings, which speak for themselves, for a complete and
`accurate statement of their contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 99.
`100. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 100.
`101. To the extent Paragraph 101 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 101.
`102. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 102.
`103. To the extent Paragraph 103 refers to a public report, Meta respectfully refers the
`Court to that public report, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its
`contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 103.
`104. Meta admits that it competes with certain application developers. Meta otherwise
`denies the allegations in Paragraph 104.
`105. To the extent Paragraph 105 refers to public statements, Meta respectfully refers
`the Court to those public statements, which speak for themselves, for a complete and accurate
`statement of their contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 105.
`106. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 106.
`107. Meta admits that Platform made it possible for software developers to build apps
`and tools that interoperate with the Facebook application. Meta otherwise denies the allegations
`in Paragraph 107.
`108. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 108.
`109. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in the first clause of Paragraph 109, and on that basis denies the allegations. Meta
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 109.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`10
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 12 of 79
`
`
`
`110. Meta admits that developers could request access to certain user content from
`Facebook. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 110.
`111. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 111.
`112. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 112.
`113. To the extent Paragraph 113 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 113.
`114. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 114.
`115. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in the first sentence of Paragraph 115, and on that basis denies the allegations. Meta
`otherwise the allegations in Paragraph 115.
`116. To the extent Paragraph 116 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 116.
`117. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 117.
`118. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 118.
`119. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 119.
`120. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 120.
`121. Meta lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of
`the allegations in the first sentence of Paragraph 121, and on that basis denies the allegations. Meta
`otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 121.
`122. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 122.
`123. To the extent Paragraph 123 refers to public statements, Meta respectfully refers
`the Court to those public statements, which speak for themselves, for a complete and accurate
`statement of their contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 123.
`124. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 124.
`125. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 125.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`11
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 13 of 79
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`126. Meta admits that, as of April 30, 2015, certain APIs previously available through
`Platform were no longer available. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 126.
`127. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 127.
`128. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 128.
`129. To the extent Paragraph 129 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 129.
`130. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 130.
`131. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 131.
`132. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 132.
`133. Meta admits that it restricted or terminated Platform access for certain apps that
`violate Facebook’s policies. Meta further admits that its competitors include Twitter, Pinterest,
`Google, and Foursquare. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 133.
`134. To the extent Paragraph 134 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 134.
`135. To the extent Paragraph 135 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 135.
`136. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 136.
`137. To the extent Paragraph 138 refers to an internal Meta presentation, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that presentation, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 137.
`138. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 138.
`139. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 139.
`140. To the extent Paragraph 140 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 140.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`12
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-08570-JD Document 408 Filed 01/10/23 Page 14 of 79
`
`
`
`141. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 141.
`142. To the extent Paragraph 142 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 142.
`143. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 143.
`144. To the extent Paragraph 144 refers to a statement by Meta, Meta respectfully refers
`the Court to that statement, which speaks for itself, for a complete and accurate statement of its
`contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 144.
`145. Meta admits that it launched “Platform 3.0.” Meta otherwise denies the allegations
`in Paragraph 145.
`146. To the extent Paragraph 146 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 146.
`147. To the extent Paragraph 147 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 147.
`148. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 148.
`149. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 149.
`150. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 150.
`151. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 151.
`152. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 152.
`153. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 153.
`154. To the extent Paragraph 154 refers to an internal Meta communication, Meta
`respectfully refers the Court to that communication, which speaks for itself, for a complete and
`accurate statement of its contents. Meta otherwise denies the allegations in Paragraph 154.
`155. Meta denies the allegations in Paragraph 155.
`
`No. 3:20-cv-08570-JD
`
`
`
`13
`
`ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED
`ADVERTISER CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket