throbber

`
` A
`
` PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
`David A. Melton, SBN 176340
`350 University Avenue, Suite 200
`Sacramento, California 95825
`TEL: 916.929.1481
`FAX: 916.927.3706
`Dmelton@porterscott.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`WALMART INC.
`
`
`
`DENNIS DEVER,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`WALMART, INC., a Kansas corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 10,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant,
`
`Defendants.
`
`10/12/2022
`
` CASE NO: 22CV02005
`
`
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
`FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE
`
`Defendant WALMART, INC. (“Defendant”) hereby answers the Original Complaint
`(“Complaint”) filed by Plaintiff DENNIS DEVER (“Plaintiff”):
`GENERAL AND SPECIFIC DENIALS
`Pursuant to the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d),
`Defendant denies, generally and specifically, each and every allegation contained in the Complaint,
`and further denies that Plaintiff has been damaged in the amount or amounts alleged therein, or in
`any other amount, or at all, by reason of any act or omission on the part of Defendant, or by any act
`or omission by any agent or employee of Defendant. Defendant further denies, generally and
`specifically, that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief whatsoever.
`//
`//
`
`{02804533.DOCX}
`
`1
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Failure to State a Cause of Action)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein fails to state facts
`sufficient to constitute a cause of action for which relief may be granted.
`SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Accidental or Unavoidable Injury)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred because
`Defendant was not negligent at the time of the accident.
`THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Acts of Other Parties)
`Defendant alleges that, if Defendant is subjected to any liability by Plaintiff, it will be due
`in whole or in part to the acts and/or omissions of other parties, or parties unknown at this time, and
`any recovery obtained by Plaintiff should be barred or reduced according to law, up to and including
`the whole thereof.
`
`FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Assumption of Risk)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred in that Plaintiff,
`with full knowledge of all risks attendant thereto, voluntarily and knowingly assumed any and all
`risks attendant upon Plaintiff’s conduct, including any purported damages alleged to be related
`thereto and proximately caused thereby.
`FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Comparative Negligence)
`Defendant alleges that Plaintiff was negligent, and otherwise at fault, with regard to the
`events alleged in the Complaint, and such negligence and fault is the proximate cause of any
`liabilities or damages Plaintiff may incur. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s recovery, if any, should be
`precluded or reduced in proportion to their negligence and fault.
`//
`//
`
`
`{02804533.DOCX}
`
`2
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Estoppel)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred by the doctrine
`of estoppel.
`
`SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Exercise of Reasonable Care)
`Defendant exercised reasonable care and did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable
`care could not have known, of the alleged acts or allegations in connection with the conditions which
`are the subject of the Complaint.
`EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Failure of Others to Exercise Reasonable Care)
`If Defendant is subjected to any liability herein, it will be due in whole, or in part, to the acts
`and/or omissions of other Defendants or other parties unknown at this time, and any recovery
`obtained by Plaintiff should be barred or reduced according to law, up to and including the whole
`thereof.
`
`NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Failure to Exercise Ordinary Care)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred in that Plaintiff
`failed to exercise ordinary and reasonable care on Plaintiff’s own behalf and such negligence and
`carelessness was a proximate cause of some portion, up to and including the whole of, Plaintiff’s
`own alleged injuries and damages, if any, and Plaintiff’s recovery therefore should be barred or
`reduced according to law, up to and including the whole thereof.
`TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Failure to Mitigate Damages)
`Plaintiff failed to take reasonable steps and make reasonable expenditures to reduce
`Plaintiff’s claims, damages, losses, if any, and that said failure to mitigate Plaintiff’s damages bars
`or reduces any claims, losses, or damages.
`//
`//
`
`
`{02804533.DOCX}
`
`3
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Intervening Acts of Others)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred because the
`injuries and damages sustained by Plaintiff, if any, were proximately caused by the intervening and
`superseding actions of others, which intervening and superseding actions bar and/or diminish
`Plaintiff’s recovery, if any, against Defendant.
`TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Laches)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred by the doctrine
`of laches.
`
`THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Lack of Notice)
`Defendant alleges that it did not have either actual or constructive notice of the conditions,
`if any, which existed at the time and places mentioned in the Complaint, which conditions may have
`caused or contributed to the damages as alleged herein. Said lack of notice prevented Defendant
`from undertaking any measures to protect against or warn of said conditions.
`FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(No Constructive Notice of Dangerous Condition)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred by the fact that
`Defendant did not have constructive notice of the allegedly unsafe conditions on the premises.
`FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Obvious Danger)
`Defendant alleges that Plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable and ordinary care, caution, or
`prudence for Plaintiff’s own safety in order to avoid the alleged accident. The resulting injuries and
`damages, if any, sustained by Plaintiff were proximately caused and contributed to by the negligence
`of Plaintiff, in that any possible danger with regard to the accident in question was obvious to anyone
`using reasonable care.
`//
`//
`
`
`{02804533.DOCX}
`
`4
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Res Judicata/Collateral Estoppel)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred by the doctrines
`of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel.
`SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Several Liability for Non-Economic Damages)
`If Defendant has any liability to Plaintiff in this action, which is denied, it is only severally
`liable for Plaintiff’s non-economic damages under California Civil Code sections 1431.1 and
`1431.2. Therefore, Defendant requests a judicial determination of the percentage of its negligence,
`if any, which proximately contributed to the subject incident.
`EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Statute of Limitations)
`The Complaint, and each and every cause of action alleged therein, is barred by the
`applicable statute of limitations, including, but not limited to, Government Code sections 12960 and
`12965; Code of Civil Procedure sections 335.1, 337, 338, 339, 340 and 343; and Business and
`Professions Code section 17208.
`NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`(Additional Defenses)
`Defendant may have additional defenses that cannot be articulated due to Plaintiff’s failure
`to particularize Plaintiff’s claims, due to the fact that Defendant does not have copies of certain
`DOCUMENTS bearing on Plaintiff’s claims and due to Plaintiff’s failure to provide more specific
`information concerning the nature of the damage claims and claims for certain costs for which
`Plaintiff alleges that Defendant may share some responsibility. Defendant therefore reserves the
`right to assert additional defenses upon further particularization of Plaintiff’s claims, upon
`examination of the DOCUMENTS provided, upon discovery of further information concerning the
`alleged damage claims and claims for costs, and upon the development of other pertinent
`information.
`//
`//
`
`
`{02804533.DOCX}
`
`5
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`

`

`//
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`WHEREFORE, Defendant prays for judgment as follows:
`1.
`That Plaintiff takes nothing by way of the Complaint;
`2.
`That judgment be entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant on all causes of
`action;
`That Defendant be awarded attorneys’ fees and costs of suit incurred herein; and
`That Defendant be awarded such other and further relief as the Court may deem just
`and proper.
`
`3.
`4.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`Defendant hereby demands a trial by jury in the above-entitled matter.
`
`Dated: October 12, 2022
`
`PORTER SCOTT
`A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
`
`By ____________________________________
`David A. Melton
`Attorney for Defendant
`WALMART INC.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`{02804533.DOCX}
`
`6
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`S
`
`

`

`CASE NAME:
`COURT:
`CASE NO.:
`
`DEVER v. WALMART, INC.
`BUTTE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
`22CV02005
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My
`business address is 350 University Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, California 95825.
`On the date below, I served the following document:
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`BY MAIL: I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices.
`I am readily familiar with this business’ practice for collecting and processing correspondence for
`mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the
`ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully
`prepaid.
`BY FAX TRANSMISSION: Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax
`transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed below. No error was
`reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed
`out, is attached
`XX BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Only by e-mailing the document(s) to the persons at the e-mail
`address(es). This is necessitated during the declared National Emergency due to the Coronavirus (Covid-
`19) pandemic because this office will be working remotely, not able to send physical mail as usual, and
`is therefore using only electronic mail. No electronic message or other indication that the transmission
`was unsuccessful was received within a reasonable time after the transmission. We will provide a
`physical copy, upon request only, when we return to the office at the conclusion of the national
`emergency. This is made pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6 as amended per SB 1146, Emergency
`Rule 12.
`
`Addressed as follows:
`Nicholas Walton
`Eric Levine
`THE LEVINE FIRM, APC
`1648 Westwood Blvd.
`Los Angeles, CA 90024
`eric@levinefirmlaw.com
`nwalton@theatlasfirm.com
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
`foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Sacramento, California on October 12, 2022.
`
`Molly A. Flores
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`{02804481.DOCX}
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`350 University Ave., Suite 200
`
`PORTER | SCOTT
`
`Sacramento, CA 95825
`
`FAX: 916.927.3706
`TEL: 916.929.1481
`
`M
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket