throbber
NAME:
`
`CITY:
`
`EMAIL ADDRESS:
`
`ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY
`STATE BAR NUMBER:
`Scott D. Calkins, Esq., SBN 187489; Anthony P. Gaeta, Esq., SBN 239754
`COLLINSWORTH, SPECHT, CALKINS & GIAMPAOLI, LLP
`FIRM NAME:
`9665 Chesapeake Dr., Suite 305
`STREET ADDRESS:
`San Diego
`858-549-2800
`TELEPHONE NO.:
`agaeta@cslawoffices.com,
`K. Hovnanian California Region, Inc.
`ATTORNEY FOR (name):
`
`CM-110
`
`FOR COURT USE ONLY
`
`STATE:
`
`FAX NO.:
`
`CA
`ZIP CODE:
`858-549-3700
`
`92123
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
`725 Court Street
`STREET ADDRESS:
`725 Court Street
`Martinez, CA 94553
`
`CITY AND ZIP CODE:
`
`MAILING ADDRESS:
`
`CONTRA COSTA
`
`BRANCH NAME:
`
` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`Nicholas Warner
`County of Contra Costa, et al.
`
`(Check one):
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`LIMITED CASE
`UNLIMITED CASE
`(Amount demanded is $35,000
`(Amount demanded
`or less)
`exceeds $35,000)
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-02689
`
`A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
`Date:
`July 11, 2024
`Time:
`8:30 a.m.
`Dept.:
`
`9
`
`Address of court (if different from the address above):
`
`Div.:
`
`Room:
`
`Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
`
`Anthony P. Gaeta
`
`INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
`1. Party or parties (answer one):
`a.
`This statement is submitted by party (name):
`K. Hovnanian California Region, Inc.
`b.
`This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
`2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
`
`a. The complaint was filed on (date):
`
`The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
`b.
`3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
`a.
`All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
`b.
`The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`have not been served
` (specify names and explain why not):
`
` (specify names):
`have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed
`
`have had a default entered against them
` (specify names):
`
`c.
`
`The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
`they may be served):
`K. Hovnanian will be filing a cross-complaint against Teichert Construction, Inc. and/or All Commercial Fence, Inc., the
`parties responsible for erecting and/or maintaining the gate which Plaintiff alleges caused his injuries.
`
`4. Description of case
`complaint
`cross-complaint
` (Describe, including causes of action):
`a. Type of case in
`Plaintiff alleges he was injured while riding a bicycle between 10:30 and 11:00 pm on property owned by the City of Antioch.
`The only cause of action alleged in the Complaint is for Dangerous Condition of Public Property, which does not apply to K.
`Hovnanian.
`
`Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
`Judicial Council of California
`CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`Cal. Rules of Court,
`rules 3.720–3.730
`www.courts.ca.gov
`
`Electronically Filed Superior Court of CA County of Contra Costa 6/27/2024 6:20 PM By: C. Jacala, Deputy
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
`
`Nicholas Warner
`
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`County of Contra Costa, et al.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-02689
`
`4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages (if personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
`damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
`earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings; if equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief):
`Plaintiff has not responded to discovery and/or submitted to and IME. Based thereon, Responding Party is unaware of the
`Plaintiff's alleged damages.
`
`CM-110
`
`(If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
`5. Jury or nonjury trial
`a jury triaI
`a nonjury trial.
` (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
`The party or parties request
`requesting a jury trial):
`
`6. Trial date
`a.
`b.
`
`The trial has been set for (date):
`No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
`not, explain):
`
`c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):
`
`7. Estimated length of trial
`The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one)
`a.
`days (specify number):
`4-6
`b.
`hours (short causes) (specify):
`
`by the attorney or party listed in the caption
`
`by the following:
`
`8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
`The party or parties will be represented at trial
`a. Attorney:
`b. Firm:
`c. Address:
`d. Telephone number:
`e. Email address:
`Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
`9. Preference
`This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
`10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
`a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
`the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the
`processes available through the court and community programs in this case.
`
`f. Fax number:
`g. Party represented:
`
`(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel
`has not provided the ADR information package identified
`has
`in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
`has
`(2) For self-represented parties: Party
`has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
`b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
`(1)
`This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
`mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
`statutory limit.
`Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
`Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
`This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
` (specify exemption):
`mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq.
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
`
`Nicholas Warner
`
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`County of Contra Costa, et al.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-02689
`
`CM-110
`
`10. c.
`
`In the table below, indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to
`participate in, or have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):
`
`The party or parties completing
`this form are willing to
`participate in the following ADR
`processes (check all that apply):
`
`If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
`participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
`indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR
`stipulation):
`
` (1) Mediation
`
` (2) Settlement
` conference
`
`(3) Neutral evaluation
`
`(4) Nonbinding judicial
` arbitration
`
` (5) Binding private
` arbitration
`
` (6) Other (specify):
`
`Mediation session not yet scheduled
`Mediation session scheduled for (date):
`
`Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
`
`Mediation completed on (date):
`
`Settlement conference not yet scheduled
`Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
`
`Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
`
`Settlement conference completed on (date):
`
`Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
`Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
`
`Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
`
`Neutral evaluation completed on (date):
`
`Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
`Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
`
`Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
`
`Judicial arbitration completed on (date):
`
`Private arbitration not yet scheduled
`Private arbitration scheduled for
`(date):
`
`Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
`
`Private arbitration completed on (date):
`
`ADR session not yet scheduled
`ADR session scheduled for (date):
`
`Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
`
`ADR completed on (date):
`
`CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
`
`Nicholas Warner
`
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`County of Contra Costa, et al.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-02689
`
`11. Insurance
`
`CM-110
`
`a.
`
`PURE Insurance
`
`Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name):
`b. Reservation of rights:
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`c.
`
`Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):
`
`12. Jurisdiction
`Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
`Other (specify):
`Bankruptcy
`Status:
`
`13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
`a.
`There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
`
`(1) Name of case:
`(2) Name of court:
`(3) Case number:
`(4) Status:
`
`Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
`
`b.
`
`A motion to
`consolidate
`coordinate
` wiII be filed by (name party):
`
`14. Bifurcation
`The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
`action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):
`K. Hovnanian is considering a motion to bifurcate liability and damages based on the Plaintiff's contributory negligence.
`
`15. Other motions
`
` (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):
`The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial
`Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Morion to Bifurcate; MSA; motions in limine.
`
`16. Discovery
`
`a.
`b.
`
`The party or parties have completed all discovery.
`The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
`
`Party
`
`K. Hovnanian
`K. Hovnanian
`K. Hovnanian
`K. Hovnanian
`
`Description
`
`Written discovery/document production
`Percipient witness deposiitosn
`IME
`Expert witness depositions
`
`Date
`
`Per Code
`Per Code
`90-120 days
`Per Code
`
`c.
`
`The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
` (specify):
`anticipated
`
`CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

` PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
`
`Nicholas Warner
`
` DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:
`
`County of Contra Costa, et al.
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`C23-02689
`
`CM-110
`
`17. Economic litigation
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $35,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
`of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
`
`This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
` (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
`discovery will be filed
`should not apply to this case):
`
`18. Other issues
`The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
`conference (specify):
`
`19. Meet and confer
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules
` (if not, explain):
`of Court
`
`After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
`(specify):
`
`20. Total number of pages attached (if any):
`
`I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
`as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
`the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.
`
`Date:
`
`June 27, 2024
`
`Anthony Gaeta
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
`
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)
`
`Additional signatures are attached.
`
`CM-110 [Rev. January 1, 2024]
`
`CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TITLE OF COURT: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA
`
`
`
`COSTA
`TITLE OF CASE: Nicholas Warner v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
`CASE NO.:
`CV-23-02689
`
`
`ATTORNEY NAME: SCOTT D. CALKINS, ESQ., SBN 187489
`scalkins@cslawoffices.com
`ANTHONY P. GAETA, ESQ., SBN 239754
`agaeta@cslawoffices.com
`
`
`
`ADDRESS:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COLLINSWORTH, SPECHT,
`CALKINS & GIAMPAOLI LLP
`9665 Chesapeake Dr., Suite 305
`San Diego, CA 92123
`(858) 549-2800/ Fax (858) 549-3700
`
`DECLARATION OF SERVICE
`
`
`I am, and was at the time of service, employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. I
`am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 9665
`Chesapeake Dr., Ste. 305, San Diego, CA 92123. On June 27, 2024, I served the document(s)
`named below in the above-referenced action as follows:
`
`
` K. HOVNANIAN CALIFORNIA REGION, INC.’S CASE MANAGEMENT
`STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`*SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST*
`
`
`SERVED UPON:
`
`
`
`
`[X]
`
`BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION [ONLY]: The above-referenced document(s)
`was/were transmitted via electronic service to all parties in this case at the respective
`electronic service address(es) listed on the attached service list. Pursuant to C.R.C. 2.251
`and Amended CCP §1010.6(e)(1)-(2), I confirm that the electronic transmission was made
`from my registered email address, mrios@cslawoffices.com provided by my employer,
`Collinsworth, Specht, Calkins & Giampaoli, LLP. The transmission was reported as
`complete and without error. A copy of said confirmation is available upon request.
`
`
`
`[X]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
`the forgoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on June 27, 2024, at San Diego, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Monique Rios
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`

`

`SERVICE LIST
`Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No.: CV-23-02689
`Nicholas Warner v. County of Contra Costa, et al.
`
`
`COUNSEL OF RECORD
`
`
` TELEPHONE/
` FAX NOS.
`
`
`
`
`PARTY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`310.407-0766
`310.407.0767 – Fax
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`415.353.0999
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`City of Antioch
`
`Yosi Yahoudai, Esq.
`Parham Nikfarjam, Esq.
`JAVAHERI & YAHOUDAI, APLC.
`1880 Century Park East, Suite 717
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`parham@jnylaw.com
`teampn@jnylaw.com
`
`Ana Escobedo – Paralegal
`ana@jnylaw.com
`
`Ethan M. Lowry, Esq.
`Diana S. Godwin, Esq.
`Bertrand Fox Elliot Osman & Wenzel
`2749 Hyde Street
`San Francisco, CA 94109
`elowry@bfesf.com
`dgodwin@bfesf.com
`
`Isabel Hernandez – Legal Assistant
`ahernandez@bfesf.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket