throbber
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/03/2019 02:54 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Vargas,Deputy Clerk
`
`Assigned for all purposes to: Spring Street Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Laura Seigle
`
`19STCV35469
`
`

`

`PLD-Pl-001
`
`SHORT TITLE:
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`
`
`HEARD v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al.
`
`4. [:1 Plaintiff (name):
`
`is doing business under the fictitious name (specify):
`
`and has complied with the fictitious business name laws.
`
`5. Each defendant named above is a natural person
`except defendant (name): CITY OF LONG BEA c. E] except defendant (name):
`(1) i:] a business organization, form unknown
`(1) l:] a business organization, form unknown
`(2) I: a corporation
`(2) E a corporation
`(3) :1 an unincorporated entity (describe):
`(3) :1 an unincorporated entity (describe):
`
`(4)
`
`a public entity (describe):
`city
`(5) [:1 other (specify):
`
`(4) I: a public entity (describe):
`
`(5) I:I other (specify):
`
`except defendant (name): NEUTRON HOLDIN d. E] except defendant (name):
`(1) II a business organization, form unknown
`(1) [:1 a business organization. form unknown
`(2)
`a corporation
`(2) l:] a corporation
`(3) I:] an unincorporated entity (describe):
`(3) I:] an unincorporated entity (describe):
`
`(4) [:1 a public entity (describe):
`
`(4) C] a public entity (describe):
`
`(5) [:1 other (specify):
`
`(5) I: other (specify):
`
`:1 Information about additional defendants who are not natural persons is contained in Attachment 5.
`
`The true names of defendants sued as Does are unknown to plaintiff.
`were the agents or employees of other
`Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers):
`1 t0 25
`named defendants and acted within the scope of that agency or employment.
`
`Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): 26 to 50
`are persons whose capacities are unknown to
`plaintiff.
`
`[:1 Defendants who are joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 382 are (names):
`
`This court is the proper court because
`a. I:] at least one defendant now resides in itsjurisdictional area.
`b. :1 the principal place of business of a defendant corporation or unincorporated association is in its jurisdictional area.
`injury to person or damage to personal property occurred in itsjurisdictional area.
`d. [:| other (specify):
`
`9. [3 Plaintiff is required to comply with a claims statute, and
`a. I:] has complied with applicable claims statutes, or
`b. E is excused from complying because (specify):
`
`

`

`
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`PLD-Pl-001
`
`SHORT TITLE:
`
`HEARD v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al.
`
`10. The following causes of action are attached and the statements above apply to each (each complaint must have one or more
`causes of action attached):
`a. I: Motor Vehicle
`General Negligence
`. D Intentional Tort
`Products Liability
`Premises Liability
`f. [:1 Other (specify):
`
`11. Plaintiff has suffered
`
`wage loss
`CI loss of use of property
`hospital and medical expenses
`general damage
`[:1 property damage
`loss of earning capacity
`other damage (specify):
`
`Future medical specials.
`
`12. I: The damages claimed for wrongful death and the relationships of plaintiff to the deceased are
`a. :1 listed in Attachment 12.
`b. l: as follows:
`
`13. The relief sought in this complaint is within the jurisdiction of this court.
`
`14. Plaintiff prays forjudgment for costs of suit; for such relief as is fair, just. and equitable; and for
`(1)
`compensatory damages
`(2) l: punitive damages
`The amount of damages is (in cases for personal injury or wrongful death, you must check (1)):
`(1)
`according to proof
`(2) E] inthe amount of: $
`
`
`
`Date: October
`
`, 2019
`
`Philip P. DeLuca, Esq.
`(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)
`
`
`

`

`SHORT TITLE:
`
`HEARD V. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al.
`
`
`
`CASE NUMBER.
`
`PLD-Pl-001 (4)
`
`FIRST
`
`(number)
`
`CAUSE OF ACTION—Premises Liability
`
`Page
`
`4
`
`[3 Cross - Complaint
`Complaint
`ATTACHMENT To
`(Use a separate cause of action form for each cause of action.)
`
`Prem.L-1. Plaintiff (name): ASHLEY HEARD and JASON HEARD
`alleges the acts of defendants were the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff.
`On (date): July 3, 2019
`plaintiff was injured on the following premises in the following
`
`fashion (description ofpremises and circumstances of injury):
`See Attachment "1".
`
`Prem.L-2.
`
`Count One—Negligence The defendants who negligently owned, maintained. managed and
`operated the described premises were (names):
`
`Does
`
`1
`
`to 50, Inclusive
`
`Prem.L—3.
`
`Count Two—Willful Failure to Warn [Civil Code section 846] The defendant owners who willfully
`or maliciously failed to guard or warn against a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity were
`(names):
`
`CITY OF LONG BEACH; and
`
`Does
`
`I
`
`to 50, Inclusive
`
`Prem.L-4.
`
`Plaintiff, a recreational user, was CI an invited guest [3 a paying guest.
`Count Three—Dangerous Condition of Public Property The defendants who owned public property
`on which a dangerous condition existed were (names):
`CITY OF LONG BEACH; and
`
`-Does1
`
`to 50,1nclusive
`
`Prem.L-5. a.
`
`a.
`
`actual Ci constructive notice of the existence of the
`The defendant public entity had
`dangerous condition in sufficient time prior to the injury to have corrected it.
`b- E The condition was created by employees of the defendant public entity.
`Allegations about Other Defendants The defendants who were the agents and employees of the
`other defendants and acted within the scope of the agency were (names):
`
`Does 26
`
`to 50,1nclusive
`
`b.
`
`The defendants who are liable to plaintiffs for other reasons and the reasons for their liability are
`:1 described in attachment Prem.L-5.b
`as follows (names):
`
`DOES 26 to 50, Inclusive
`
`Pa e 1 on
`
`

`

`
`
`SHORT TITLE:
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`MC-025
`
`HEARD v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al.
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT (Number): "1"
`
`(This Attachment may be used with any Judicial Council form.)
`On or about July 3, 2019, 3:14 pm, Plaintiff, ASHLEY HEARD was operating a Lime electric scooter with
`her legal spouse, JASON HEARD observing nearby on one of Defendant, CITY OF LONG BEACH’s streets,
`to wit, believed to be Windsor Way, adjacent to Queen Mary parking lot when Mrs. HEARD suddenly hit a
`large and deep pothole causing her to fall from said Lime scooter and suffered severe permanent and
`personally disfiguring injuries, to wit, right shoulder soreness radiating into right wrist, right hip soreness
`aggravation of pre—existing condition (torn ACL) various dislocations on right knee, fractured right tibia with
`insertion of plate and screws, fifty (50) staples on back of leg, blisters with drain, right ankle with severe
`bruising, road rash on right of her arm, wrist, legs and body, permanent scarring throughout her body.
`Moreover, Mrs. HEARD suffers from severe emotional distress and aggravation of pre-existing conditions and
`was unusually susceptible as to emotional distress, anxiety-panic disorder, major depressive disorder and
`Thyroid condition, respectively. Mrs HEARD has been experiencing panic/anxiety attacks since the accident;
`she has had several panic attacks (2 per day), insomnia, and when she falls sleep she wakes up screaming,
`possible PTSD, and her husband has to wake her out of it. Damages are ongoing and continuous as a result of
`Defendant, CITY OF LONG BEACH's dangerous condition of public property at the location in question.
`Moreover, Mrs. HEARD has had surgeries involving permanent placement of metal hardware, including, but
`not limited to plates and screws, and will need future surgeries to correct and revise her condition.
`
`As a result of observing his legal spouse, ASHLEY HEARD suffer from the permanently disfiguring personal
`injuries, JASON HEARD is claiming negligent infliction of severe emotional distress. He is also claiming loss
`of consortium due to the damages suffered to the marital relationship in terms of companionship, moral
`support and/or intimacy and related issues arising out of the wrongful injury to his spouse.
`
`Defendant, CITY OF LONG BEACH and DOES 1 to 50 and each of them negligently owned, possessed,
`operated, controlled, managed, and/or maintained their premises and/or failed to warn of a dangerous condition
`of their premises and/or make it safe for patrons, including Plaintiffs, ASHLEY HEARD and JASON HEARD,
`thereby, actually, legally, and/or proximately causing their injuries and damages.
`
`(If the item that this Attachment concerns is made under penalty ofperjury, all statements in this
`Attachment are made underpenalty ofperjury.)
`
`
`Page
`5
`of
`7
`(Add pages as required)
`
`

`

`SHORT TITLE:
`
`HEARD v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et a1.
`
`
`
`CASE NUMBER.
`
`PLD-PI-001 (2)
`
`SECOND
`(number)
`
`CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence
`
`Page
`
`6
`
`ATTACHMENTTO
`
`Complaint :1 Cross-Complaint
`
`(Use a separate cause of action form for each cause of action.)
`
`GN-1. Plaintiff (name): ASHLEY HEARD and JASON HEARD
`
`alleges that defendant (name): NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC. dba LIME; and
`
`1:] Does
`
`1
`
`to
`
`50, Inclusive
`
`was the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff. By the following acts or omissions to act. defendant
`negligently caused the damage to plaintiff
`on (date): July 3, 2019
`at (place): believed to be Windsor Way, adjacent to Queen Mary parking lot, Long Beach, CA 90807.
`
`(description of reasons for liability):
`
`Plaintiff, ASHLEY HEARD was operating a Lime electric scooter rented from Defendants and
`each of them with her legal spouse, JASON HEARD observing nearby when Mrs. HEARD
`suddenly hit a large and deep pothole causing her to fall from said Lime scooter and suffered
`severe permanent and personally disfiguring injuries, to wit, right shoulder soreness radiating into
`right wrist, right hip soreness aggravation of pre-existing condition (torn ACL) various
`dislocations on right knee, fractured right tibia with insertion of plate and screws, fifty (50)
`staples on back of leg, blisters with drain, right ankle with severe bruising, road rash on right of
`her arm, wrist, legs and body, permanent scarring throughout her body. Moreover, Mrs. HEARD
`suffers from severe emotional distress and aggravation of pre—existing conditions and was
`unusually susceptible as to emotional distress, anxiety-panic disorder, major depressive disorder
`and Thyroid condition, respectively. Mrs HEARD has been experiencing panic/anxiety attacks
`since the accident; she has had several panic attacks (2 per day), insomnia, and when she falls
`sleep she wakes up screaming, possible PTSD, and her husband has to wake her out of it.
`Damages are ongoing and continuous as a result of Defendant, CITY OF LONG BEACH'S
`dangerous condition of public property at the location in question. Moreover, Mrs. HEARD has
`had surgeries involving permanent placement of metal hardware, including, but not limited to
`plates and screws, and will need fiiture surgeries to correct and revise her condition.
`
`As a result of observing his legal spouse, ASHLEY HEARD suffer from the permanently
`disfiguring personal injuries, JASON HEARD is claiming negligent infliction of severe emotional
`distress. He is also claiming loss of consortium due to the damages suffered to the marital
`relationship in terms of companionship, moral support and/or intimacy and related issues arising
`out of the wrongful injury to his spouse.
`
`Defendants, DOES 1 to 50 and each of them negligently owned, possessed, operated, controlled,
`managed, and/or maintained their premises and/or failed to warn of a dangerous condition of their
`premises and/or make it safe for patrons, including Plaintiffs.
`
`Page1 ot1
`
`

`

`PLD-Pl-001 (5)
`
`SHORT TITLE:
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`HEARD v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al.
`
`
`
`THIRD
`
`(number)
`
`
`CAUSE OF ACTION—Products Liability
`Page
`7
`
`Complaint B Cross - Complaint
`ATTACHMENT TO
`(Use a separate cause of action form for each cause of action.)
`Plaintiff (name): ASHLEY HEARD and JASON HEARD
`
`plaintiff was injured by the following product:
`July 3, 2019
`Prod. L-1. On or about (date):
`a Lime electn'c scooter, manufactured, owned, rented, and/or distributed by NEUTRON HOLDINGS,
`INC. dba LIME
`
`Prod. L-2. Each of the defendants knew the product would be purchased and used without inspection for defects.
`The product was defective when it left the control of each defendant. The product at the time of injury
`was being
`E] used in the manner intended by the defendants.
`used in the manner that was reasonably foreseeable by defendants as involving a substantial danger not
`readily apparent. Adequate warnings of the danger were not given.
`Prod. L-3. Plaintiff was a
`
`I: purchaser of the product.
`Cl bystander to the use of the product.
`
`user of the product.
`other (specify):
`renter of the product.
`PLAINTIFF'S INJURY WAS THE LEGAL (PROXIMATE) RESULT OF THE FOLLOWING:
`Prod. L- 4.
`Count One—Strict liability of the following defendants who
`a.
`manufactured or assembled the product (names):
`NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC. dba LIME; and
`
`Does 1
`
`to 50, Inclusive
`
`b.
`
`designed and manufactured component parts supplied to the manufacturer (names):
`
`Does 26
`
`to 50, Inclusive
`
`c.
`
`sold the product to the public (names):
`NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC. dba LIME; and
`
`Prod. L-5.
`
`Prod. L-6.
`
`Prod. L-7.
`
`Does 1
`to 50, Inclusive
`Count Two—Negligence of the following defendants who owed a duty to plaintiff (names):
`NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC. dba LIME; and
`Does
`l
`to 50, Inclusive
`Count Three—Breach of warranty by the following defendants (names):
`NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC. dba LIME; and
`Does l
`to 50, Inclusive
`who breached an implied warranty
`a.
`b. E who breached an ex ress warranty which was
`l:l written
`ii oral
`The defendants who are liable to plaintiffs for other reasons and the reasons for the liability are
`l:l listed in Attachment-Prod. L-7
`as follows:
`NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC. dba LIME; and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive
`
`Page 1 on
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket