throbber
10/1/2020
`
`
`
`HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
`Ann Marie Mortimer (State Bar No. 169077)
`amortimer@HuntonAK.com
`Jason J. Kim (State Bar No. 221476)
`kimj@HuntonAK.com
`Jeff R. R. Nelson (State Bar No. 301546)
`jnelson@HuntonAK.com
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`Telephone: (213) 532-2000
`Facsimile: (213) 532-2020
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`
`
`SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
`
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`20-CIV-04256
`
`
` CASE NO.:
`
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`BRANDTOTAL LTD., an Israeli corporation,
`and UNIMANIA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Plaintiff Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) alleges the following:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`Beginning no later than September 2019 and continuing until at least September 2020,
`
`Defendants BrandTotal Ltd. (“BrandTotal”) and Unimania, Inc. (Unimania”) developed and
`
`distributed internet browser extensions (“malicious extensions”) designed to improperly collect data
`
`from Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, Amazon, Facebook, and Instagram. Defendants distributed the
`
`malicious extensions on the Google Chrome Store. Anyone who installed one of Defendants’
`
`malicious extensions essentially self-compromised their browsers to run automated programs designed
`
`to collect data about its user from specific websites. As to Facebook and Instagram, when a user
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`visited those sites with a self-compromised browser, Defendants used the malicious extensions to
`
`11
`
`connect to Facebook computers and collect or “scrape” user profile information (including name, user
`
`12
`
`ID, gender, date of birth, relationship status, and location information), advertisements and advertising
`
`13
`
`metrics (including name of the advertiser, image and text of the advertisement, and user interaction
`
`14
`
`and reaction metrics), and user Ad Preferences (user advertisement interest information). Defendants
`
`15
`
`used the data collected by the malicious extensions to sell “marketing intelligence,” and other services
`
`16
`
`through the website brandtotal.com. Defendants’ conduct was not authorized by Facebook.
`
`17
`
`2.
`
`Facebook brings this action to stop Defendants’ violations of Facebook’s and
`
`18
`
`Instagram’s Terms and Policies. Facebook also brings this action to obtain damages and disgorgement
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`19
`
`for breach of contract and unjust enrichment.
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff Facebook is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in
`
`PARTIES
`
`22
`
`Menlo Park, San Mateo County, California. Instagram is a subsidiary and product of Facebook.
`
`23
`
`4.
`
`Defendant BrandTotal Ltd. was incorporated in Israel on November 20, 2016, and on
`
`24
`
`information and belief, is headquartered in Israel. Ex. 1. BrandTotal Ltd. has a subsidiary named
`
`25
`
`BrandTotal Inc. that was incorporated in Delaware on November 13, 2017, has an office in New York,
`
`26
`
`New York, and sells BrandTotal’s services in the U.S. Exs. 2 – 4. BrandTotal operates the website
`
`27
`
`brandtotal.com, where it sells marketing intelligence through its software-as-a-service platform. Ex.
`
`28
`
`5. BrandTotal controls the malicious extension named “UpVoice” that was used to scrape data from
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`social media services. BrandTotal distributed the malicious extension on the Chrome Web Store under
`
`the developer name “UpVoice.” Ex. 6. Despite its scraping practices, BrandTotal received
`
`approximately $8 million in venture capital funding between 2017 and 2018. Ex. 7.
`
`5.
`
` Defendant Unimania, Inc. (“Unimania”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on
`
`November 27, 2017. Ex. 8. Unimania developed and distributed the malicious extension named “Ads
`
`Feed” on the Chrome Web Store. Ex. 9. Unimania’s website, unimania.xyz, consists of only a landing
`
`page. Ex. 10. In May 2018, AdGuard Research reported that Unimania browser extensions for
`
`Chrome were designed to scrape data from Facebook. See https://adguard.com/en/blog/unimania-
`
`spyware-campaign.html. Those extensions were removed from the Google Chrome Store in 2018.
`
`10
`
`6.
`
`Defendants shared common employees and agents. For example, BrandTotal’s Chief
`
`11
`
`Product Officer and General Manager (Ex. 5), created Facebook accounts in the name of Unimania
`
`12
`
`and the Ads Feed extension. BrandTotal’s Chief Technology Officer and co-founder (Ex. 5) also
`
`13
`
`administered Unimania accounts on Facebook.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`7.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to California Code of Civil
`
`16
`
`Procedure § 410.10. The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of this Court,
`
`17
`
`and the total amount of damages sought exceeds $25,000, exclusive of interest and costs. Defendants’
`
`18
`
`unlawful conduct and breaches have interfered with Facebook’s business and operation of its service.
`
`19
`
`8.
`
`Defendants had multiple Facebook accounts and thereby agreed to Facebook’s Terms
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`20
`
`of Service and Commercial Terms. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because
`
`
`
`21
`
`Facebook’s Commercial Terms contain a forum selection clause that requires this complaint be
`
`22
`
`resolved in a state court located in San Mateo County, and that Defendants submit to the personal
`
`23
`
`jurisdiction of this Court.
`
`24
`
`9.
`
`Defendants also agreed to the Instagram Terms of Use. The Instagram Terms of Use
`
`25
`
`contain a forum selection clause that requires this complaint be resolved by this Court, and that
`
`26
`
`Defendants submit to the personal jurisdiction of this Court.
`
`27
`
`10.
`
`Additionally, the Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they
`
`28
`
`knowingly directed and targeted their conduct at California and at Facebook, which has its principal
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`place of business in California. Defendants also transacted business and engaged in commerce in
`
`California by, among other things, distributing malicious extensions to California-based Facebook and
`
`Instagram users and using California-based services during their data harvesting scheme.
`
`11.
`
`By agreeing to the forum selection clause in the Facebook Terms of Service and
`
`Instagram Terms of Use, Defendants agreed that this Court is the proper venue for this matter.
`
`Additionally, venue is proper in this Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 395.5
`
`because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims alleged in this complaint occurred in
`
`San Mateo County.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`Background on Facebook and Instagram
`
`Facebook is a social networking website and mobile application that enables its users
`
`A.
`
`12.
`
`12
`
`to create their own personal profiles and connect with each other on their personal computers and
`
`13
`
`mobile devices. As of August 2020, Facebook daily active users averaged 1.79 billion and monthly
`
`14
`
`active users averaged 2.7 billion. Facebook has several products, including Instagram. Facebook
`
`15
`
`owns and operates the Instagram service, platform, and computers.
`
`16
`
`13.
`
`Instagram is a photo and video sharing service, mobile application, and social network.
`
`17
`
`Instagram users can post photos and videos to their profiles. They can also view and comment on
`
`18
`
`posts shared by others on Instagram.
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`19
`
`14.
`
`To create a Facebook or Instagram account, Facebook requires users to register with a
`
`20
`
`unique username and password. Registered users can create user profiles and include information
`
`
`
`21
`
`about themselves, including email address, phone numbers, date of birth, and gender.
`
`22
`
`15.
`
`Anyone with a Facebook or Instagram account can create and place ads on Facebook
`
`23
`
`and Instagram. Every week, users and businesses create millions of ads through Facebook’s ad
`
`24
`
`platform, which provides advertisers with many options for reaching audiences.
`
`25
`
`26
`
`B.
`
`16.
`
`Facebook’s Ad Library
`
`The Facebook Ad Library (available at https://www.facebook.com/ads/library) allows
`
`27
`
`anyone to search and view ads published on Facebook or Instagram. It was first created as the Political
`
`28
`
`Ad Archive in May 2018. The current version was made public in March 2019 and expanded the
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`scope of the library to include all active ads running in all countries and inactive ads if the ad is about
`
`social issues, elections or politics. Ads from the latter category will be in the library for up to 7 years.
`
`Only ads that have been viewed by a Facebook or Instagram user will appear in the library.
`
`17.
`
`The Ad Library displays information about the Facebook Page responsible for running
`
`the ads. The “page transparency” section in the library displays the creation date of the Page, Page
`
`name changes, mergers with other Pages, and total spent by the Page on social issues, elections or
`
`politics.
`
`18.
`
`The library is also searchable. Ads can be searched using a key word and results display
`
`the text and image used in the ad. Results can further be filtered by geographic region, platform,
`
`10
`
`number of users that viewed the ad, and views on a particular day.
`
`11
`
`19.
`
`The library does not contain information about the specific users who viewed an ad or
`
`12
`
`a user’s reaction or interactions with an ad. Therefore, a user’s name, ID, date of birth, gender,
`
`13
`
`relationship status, location information, and Ad Preferences are not available in the Ad Library.
`
`14
`
`Similarly, the number of comments, likes, user shares, and other user interaction or reactions are not
`
`15
`
`publicly available in the Ad Library.
`
`16
`
`17
`
`C.
`
`20.
`
`Facebook and Instagram Terms and Policies
`
`All Facebook users must agree to Facebook’s Terms of Service (available at
`
`18
`
`https://www.facebook.com/terms.php) and other rules that govern access to and use of Facebook,
`
`19
`
`which may also include the Facebook Commercial Terms1 (collectively, “Facebook Terms and
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`20
`
`Policies”).
`
`
`
`21
`
`21.
`
`Everyone who uses Instagram agrees to Instagram’s Terms of Use and to other rules
`
`22
`
`that govern access to and use of Instagram, including Instagram’s Community Guidelines and Platform
`
`23
`
`Policy (collectively, “Instagram Terms and Policies”).
`
`24
`
`22.
`
`Instagram’s Terms of Use and Section 3.2.1 of the Facebook Terms of Service prohibits
`
`25
`
`users from “do[ing] . . . anything unlawful, misleading, [ ] or fraudulent” or facilitate or support others
`
`26
`
`in doing so.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`1 Facebook Commercial Terms apply to access and use of Facebook and Facebook Products for any
`business or commercial purpose.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`23.
`
`Section 3.2.2 of the Facebook Terms of Service prohibits users from “do[ing] anything
`
`that could . . . impair the proper working or appearance of [Facebook] Products.”
`
`24.
`
`Instagram’s Terms of Use also prohibit users from “do[ing] anything to interfere with
`
`or impair the intended operation of the [Instagram] Service.”
`
`25.
`
`Section 3.2.3 of the Facebook Terms of Service prohibits “access[ing] or collect[ing]
`
`data from [Facebook] Products using automated means (without our permission) or attempt[ing] to
`
`access data you don’t have permission to access.”
`
`26.
`
`The Instagram Terms of Use also prohibit (a) “access[ing] or collect[ing] in
`
`unauthorized ways . . . [including] collecting information in an automated way without our express
`
`10
`
`permission;” and (b) “violat[ing] someone else’s rights, including intellectual property rights.”
`
`11
`
`12
`
`D.
`
`27.
`
`Background on Scraping
`
`“Web scraping” refers to the process of extracting data from a website interface by
`
`13
`
`using unauthorized automated means, such as specialized tools and software. Websites, including the
`
`14
`
`official Facebook site, are designed for human end-users and not for automated use, and employ anti-
`
`15
`
`scraping measures to prevent and detect web scraping.
`
`16
`
`28.
`
`Automation tools and software are necessary for scraping. Facebook employs a
`
`17
`
`number of measures to detect and disrupt unauthorized automated requests on its systems, including
`
`18
`
`monitoring use patterns that are inconsistent with a human user, CAPTCHA, and disabling of accounts
`
`19
`
`engaged in automated activity.
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`20
`
`29. When scrapers extract the desired data, they often restructure and format it, and save
`
`
`
`21
`
`and store it for further use, such as lead generation and pricing competition and ads optimization.
`
`22
`
`23
`
`E.
`
`30.
`
`Background on Internet Browser Extensions
`
`Internet browsers, such as Google Chrome, Opera, and Firefox, are used to access the
`
`24
`
`internet. Internet browsers follow instructions from websites, in computer code, to render and display
`
`25
`
`a website’s content for users to see. Website content is largely delivered in HTML code. Internet
`
`26
`
`browsers are designed to render the HTML code and display it in images and text for the user’s screen.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`31.
`
`Internet browser extensions are software components that alter a browser’s
`
`functionality. Browser extensions can be installed to enhance user experience and the functionality of
`
`the browser. For example, a browser extension can block pop-up ads.
`
`32.
`
`Browser extensions can also be used in illicit ways. Browser extensions can be coded
`
`to access the full array of information available to the browser and its functionalities. For example, a
`
`browser extension can be designed to monitor a user’s browsing session, manipulate how the content
`
`of visited websites is displayed, and take other unauthorized actions.
`
`33.
`
`Browser extensions are available for download by users from online browser stores,
`
`which are often managed by the browser developer (i.e., Chrome Web Store). In order for a browser
`
`10
`
`extension to install, the user typically must grant permissions for the extension to download and install
`
`11
`
`on the user’s device.
`
`12
`
`13
`
`F.
`
`34.
`
`14
`
`and Policies.
`
`Defendants Accepted Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms and Policies
`
`At all relevant times, Defendants were bound by Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms
`
`15
`
`35.
`
`BrandTotal, through its agents and employees, created a Facebook account in the name
`
`16
`
`of “BrandTotal Analytics” on or about June 13, 2017, and a BrandTotal Instagram account on or about
`
`17
`
`December 5, 2016. BrandTotal also created a Facebook business account on or about February 21,
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`18
`
`2017.
`
`19
`
`36.
`
`On or about September 3, 2019, BrandTotal, through its agents and employees, created
`
`20
`
`a Facebook business account for UpVoice. On or about June 8, 2020, BrandTotal, through its agents
`
`
`
`21
`
`and employees, created a Facebook business account named UpVoiceUS.
`
`22
`
`37.
`
`On July 4, 2018, Unimania, through its agents and employees, created a Facebook
`
`23
`
`business account in the name of Unimania.
`
`24
`
`38.
`
`Between 2017 and 2019, Defendants’ employees and agents created and administrated
`
`25
`
`three Facebook Pages. The Pages were used to promote both malicious extensions and BrandTotal’s
`
`26
`
`marketing service.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`39.
`
`Between July 2018 and June 2020, Defendants’ employees and agents created and
`
`controlled seven Facebook advertising accounts. Defendants used Facebook to promote both
`
`malicious extensions and BrandTotal’s marketing service as set forth in Figures 1 and 2.
`
`Figure 1: BrandTotal Advertisement on
`Facebook
`
`Figure 2: UpVoice Extension Advertisement
`on Facebook
`
`BrandTotal
`Sponsored ,
`
`•••
`
`ill'Yo • UpVolce
`Sponsored · 0
`
`Spending a lot more time on your computer lately?
`Join the thousands of people who already earned gitt cards by joining
`UpVolce.
`Just add the Chrome extension to start earning.
`It's THAT easy!
`
`Discover who your competitors are marketing
`to, what they're targeting, when they're
`advertising, and how much they're spending
`using BrandTotal's all-in-one competitive
`intelligence platform.
`
`Get a free analysis on your competitors ...
`Here
`https://intelligence.brandtotal.oom
`
`WHAT ARE YOUR COMPETITORS
`SPENDING THEIR MONEY ON?
`
`Br11ndTot11I
`
`INTELLIGENCE.BRANDTOTALCOM
`All-In-One Competitor Intelligence Platform
`Find out who your competitors are marketing to, what...
`
`JOINUPVOICE.COM
`UpVoice I Browse regularly, earn gift cards
`Join thousands of people who earn gift cards by checking ...
`
`Download
`
`
`
`
`
`G.
`
`Defendants’ Unlawful Data Scraping Operation
`
`1.
`
`Overview
`
`40.
`
`Since at least September 2019 and continuing until at least September 2020, Defendants
`
`developed and distributed at least two malicious extensions called UpVoice and Ads Feed. Defendants
`
`distributed the malicious extensions on the Chrome Web Store. Exs. 6 and 9. Since September 2019,
`
`the malicious extensions have been installed by thousands of users. These malicious extensions were
`
`programmed to scrape data from various websites and deliver it to Defendants.
`
`41.
`
`BrandTotal enticed users to install the UpVoice extension from the Google Chrome
`
`Store by offering payments in exchange for installs, in the form of online gift cards, and claiming that
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`the users who installed the extension became “panelists . . . [who] impact the marketing decisions and
`
`brand strategies of multi-billion dollars (sic) corporations.” Ex. 6.
`
`42.
`
`Similarly, Unimania promoted its Ads Feed extension on the Google Chrome Store by
`
`claiming that the users became “a panel member of an elite community group that impacts the
`
`advertising decisions of multi-billion dollar corporations!” Ex. 9.
`
`43.
`
`Once installed by the users, however, Defendants used the users’ browsers as a proxy
`
`to access Facebook computers, without Facebook’s authorization, meanwhile pretending to be a
`
`legitimate Facebook or Instagram user. The malicious extensions contained JavaScript files designed
`
`to web scrape the user’s profile information, user advertisement interest information, and
`
`10
`
`advertisements and advertising metrics from ads appearing on a user’s account, while the user visited
`
`11
`
`the Facebook or Instagram websites. The data scraped by Defendants included both public and non-
`
`12
`
`publicly viewable data about the users.
`
`13
`
`44.
`
`Defendants’ malicious extensions were designed to web scrape Facebook and
`
`14
`
`Instagram user profile information, regardless of the account’s privacy settings. The malicious
`
`15
`
`extensions were programmed to send unauthorized, automated commands to Facebook and Instagram
`
`16
`
`servers purporting to originate from the user (instead of Defendants), web scrape the information, and
`
`17
`
`send the scraped data to the user’s computer, and then to servers that Defendants controlled.
`
`18
`
`45.
`
` Defendants used the data collected by the malicious extensions to sell “marketing
`
`19
`
`intelligence,” and other services through the website brandtotal.com. BrandTotal publicly stated that
`
`20
`
`it used the data obtained through the malicious extensions to provide marketing insights about users
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`
`
`21
`
`and advertisers. Exs. 5 and 11.
`
`22
`
`23
`
`2.
`
`The UpVoice Malicious Extension
`
`46.
`
` Since at least September 2019, BrandTotal developed, promoted, and distributed the
`
`24
`
`UpVoice extension. BrandTotal programmed the UpVoice extension to web scrape data from both
`
`25
`
`Facebook and Instagram, as well as Amazon, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and YouTube. BrandTotal
`
`26
`
`further programmed the UpVoice extension to send the scraped data to a server controlled by
`
`27
`
`Defendants.
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`47.
`
`BrandTotal maintained and operated the website joinupvoice.com, which it used to
`
`promote the UpVoice malicious extension. Exs. 11-12. To incentivize the installation of that
`
`malicious extension, BrandTotal offered gift cards to visitors who installed it. Ex. 11. For example,
`
`on its website, as shown in Figure 3 below, BrandTotal promoted the UpVoice browser extension as
`
`a way to “[g]et paid for the time you spend on” Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Amazon and Twitter.
`
`Id. And visitors to the website were instructed to “[a]dd the UpVoice Chrome extension to your
`
`desktop browser [to] start earning gift cards.” Id. Once a user registered on joinupvoice.com, the user
`
`would need to install the UpVoice malicious extension from the Chrome Web Store.
`
`Figure 3: UpVoice Website
`
`UPVDICE
`
`WWIUS
`
`HOWITWOAl(S
`
`REVIEWS
`
`REWARDS
`
`A80UT
`
`f) CON11NU(; WITH 1-ACEBOOK
`
`Get paid for the
`ti~ e 'ou spend on
`
`Add the UpVoice Chrome extension to your desktop browser and start eommg grit
`cords for vis,ting our portrc,patrng sites regularly. It's THAT easy!
`n CONTINUE WITH FACEBOOK
`
`► WATCH VIDEO
`
`Hovv it vvorks
`
`~ ~
`
`Browse
`Continue your regular browsing
`activity
`
`Install
`After signing up. we will invite you to
`install the UpVoice Chrome
`extension. It's safe and won't ,mpact
`your browser performance
`
`Earn
`When you browse through our
`participotrng srtes. the Chrome
`extension anonymously captures
`your ods and gives you daily parms
`hat can later be redeemed for a
`var ,ety of 91ft cards
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`48.
`
`BrandTotal deceived visitors to the website into believing Facebook, and other social
`
`networks were working with UpVoice and BrandTotal by identifying Facebook and the other
`
`companies as “participating sites,” (Exs. 11 and 13) when in fact, Facebook did not authorize
`
`Defendants to scrape data from its computers. Additionally, although Instagram was not included in
`
`the list of “participating sites,” BrandTotal collected advertising data and Instagram user profile
`
`information from users who installed the malicious extension. Ex. 13.
`
`49.
`
`BrandTotal programmed the malicious extension to web scrape user profile
`
`information and advertising data from Instagram users who installed the UpVoice malicious extension.
`
`Ex. 14. BrandTotal caused the malicious extension to scrape advertisements and advertising metrics,
`
`10
`
`including information about the advertiser, the image and text of the advertisement, and user
`
`11
`
`interaction and reaction metrics (e.g., number of views, comments, likes) associated with an
`
`12
`
`advertisement. Id.
`
`13
`
`50.
`
`BrandTotal programmed the malicious extension to scrape Instagram user profile
`
`14
`
`information, including the user’s name, account name, user ID, profile picture, and other information
`
`15
`
`about the user’s account. Id.
`
`16
`
`51.
`
`BrandTotal also programmed the UpVoice malicious extension to send automated
`
`17
`
`requests to Facebook servers to obtain user profile information for Facebook users and advertising
`
`18
`
`data. Exs. 15-19. The malicious extension was coded to scrape information when a user visited
`
`19
`
`Facebook. BrandTotal caused the user’s ID, gender, date of birth, relationship status, and location
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`20
`
`information to be scraped, regardless of the user’s privacy settings. Id. BrandTotal also scraped Ad
`
`
`
`21
`
`Preferences information (Ex. 18), which is nonpublic information Facebook uses to determine what
`
`22
`
`ads to show a user based on a user’s activity on Facebook and Instagram, and other information.
`
`23
`
`52.
`
`BrandTotal also coded the UpVoice malicious extension to send requests to Facebook
`
`24
`
`servers to obtain advertisements and advertising metrics, including information about the advertiser,
`
`25
`
`the image and text of the advertisement, and user interaction and reaction metrics (e.g., number of
`
`26
`
`views, comments, likes) associated with an advertisement. Ex. 20.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`3.
`
`Ads Feed Malicious Extension
`
`53.
`
`Since at least November 2019, Unimania developed, promoted, and distributed the Ads
`
`Feed malicious extension on the Google Chrome Store. Ex. 9. Unimania programmed the Ads Feed
`
`extension to web scrape data from both Facebook and Instagram, as well as Amazon, Twitter, and
`
`YouTube. The data collected through the Ads Feed malicious extension was sent to the same servers
`
`as the data collected through the UpVoice malicious extension.
`
`54.
`
`According to the overview of the malicious extension on the Google Chrome Store, the
`
`malicious extension saves 90 days of advertisements from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube,
`
`and Amazon and allows the user to “click back to those that interest you.” Id. Unlike the UpVoice
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`malicious extension, BrandTotal did not offer users a financial incentive for installing the Ads Feed
`
`11
`
`malicious extension. Id.
`
`12
`
`55.
`
`The Ads Feed malicious extension used code almost identical to the code used in the
`
`13
`
`UpVoice malicious extension to scrape user profile data, advertisements and advertising metrics, and
`
`14
`
`Ad Preference information from Facebook and Instagram. For example, like the UpVoice extension,
`
`15
`
`the Ads Feed malicious extension scraped the image and text of the advertisement, and user
`
`16
`
`interactions with the ad (e.g., number of views, comments, likes) from Facebook and Instagram ads,
`
`17
`
`returned it to the user’s browser, and then sent it to a server controlled by Defendants.
`
`18
`
`19
`
`H.
`
`56.
`
`Facebook’s Enforcement Efforts
`
`In September 2020, Facebook took various technical enforcement measures against
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`20
`
`Defendants, including disabling Facebook and Instagram accounts and Pages. Facebook also made
`
`
`
`21
`
`multiple requests to Google to remove and disable the extensions from the Chrome Store, but Google
`
`22
`
`has not yet done so.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`I.
`
`57.
`
`Defendants Unjustly Enriched Themselves and Harmed Facebook
`
`Defendants’ violations of Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms and Policies have harmed
`
`25
`
`Facebook. Defendants interfered and continued to interfere with Facebook’s and Instagram’s
`
`26
`
`platforms.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`58.
`
`Facebook suffered damages attributable to the efforts and resources it used to
`
`investigate and remediate Defendants’ conduct in an amount to be determined at trial, and in excess
`
`of $25,000.
`
`59.
`
`Since at least September 2019, Defendants have unjustly enriched themselves at
`
`Facebook’s expense in an amount to be determined at trial. Facebook is entitled to an accounting by
`
`Defendants and a disgorgement of all unlawful profits gained from their conduct.
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`(Breach of Contract)
`
`60.
`
`61.
`
`Facebook realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs here.
`
`Since December 2016, Defendants, through their employees and agents, created
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`multiple Facebook and Instagram accounts and agreed to Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms and
`
`12
`
`Policies. Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms constitute an agreement between Defendants and
`
`13
`
`Facebook. Defendants also agreed to Facebook and Instagram’s Terms and Policies through the use
`
`14
`
`of the service.
`
`15
`
`62.
`
`Facebook has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required of them in
`
`16
`
`accordance with Facebook’s and Instagram’s Terms and Policies.
`
`17
`
`63.
`
`Defendants’ actions interfered and caused others to interfere with Facebook and
`
`18
`
`Instagram, and engaged with Facebook and Instagram in unauthorized ways.
`
`19
`
`64.
`
`Defendants have breached and continue to breach Facebook Terms 3.2.1, 3.2.2, and
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`20
`
`3.2.3 and Instagram’s Terms of Use. Facebook’s Terms prohibit (a) using automated means without
`
`
`
`21
`
`Facebook’s permission to web scrape user profiles and account and advertising information from
`
`22
`
`Facebook and Instagram; (b) scraping Facebook and Instagram user profile information and
`
`23
`
`advertising data by sending code to Facebook that purported to originate from the user, which is
`
`24
`
`“unlawful, misleading, [ ] or fraudulent;” (c) falsely representing to users that Facebook is a
`
`25
`
`“participating site” in Defendants’ scraping activity; and (d) scraping the intellectual property rights
`
`26
`
`of others by harvesting advertising images and text. Instagram’s Terms of Use also prohibit the same
`
`27
`
`conduct.
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`65.
`
`Defendants’ many breaches have caused Facebook to incur damages in excess of
`
`$25,000. Accordingly, Facebook seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
`
`66.
`
`Facebook likewise seeks injunctive relief. As a direct result of Defendants’ unlawful
`
`actions, Facebook has suffered and continues to suffer irreparable harm for which there is no adequate
`
`remedy at law, and which will continue unless Defendants’ actions are enjoined.
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`(Unjust Enrichment)
`
`67.
`
`68.
`
`Facebook realleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs here.
`
`Defendants’ acts as alleged herein constitute unjust enrichment of the Defendants at
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Facebook’s expense.
`
`11
`
`69.
`
`Defendants accessed and used, without authorization or permission, Facebook’s
`
`12
`
`service, platform, and computer network, all of which belong to Facebook.
`
`13
`
`70.
`
`Defendants used Facebook’s service, platform, and computer network to, among other
`
`14
`
`things, scrape data from Instagram and Facebook, including non-publicly viewable data.
`
`15
`
`71.
`
`Defendants received a benefit by profiting from the data they wrongfully scraped from
`
`16
`
`Facebook and Instagram, which they used to sell “marketing intelligence” and services. But for
`
`17
`
`Defendants’ wrongful, unauthorized, and intentional use of Facebook and Instagram, they would not
`
`Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
`550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
`Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
`
`18
`
`have obtained such profits.
`
`19
`
`72.
`
`Defendants’ retention of the profits derived from their unauthorized use of Facebook’s
`
`20
`
`service, platform, and computer network, including data, would be unjust.
`
`
`
`21
`
`73.
`
`Facebook seeks an accounting and disgorgement of Defendants’ ill-gotten profits in an
`
`22
`
`amount to be determined at trial.
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Facebook seeks a judgment awarding the following relief:
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`(a)
`
`A permanent injunc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket