throbber
Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 1 of 22
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`MACON DIVISION
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`ONESOUTH BANK,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) Case No. 5:20-cv-00379
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`HERMAN CURT TITSHAW; CRISP
`)
`
`MELONS, INC.; SUMMER TIME
`)
`
`MELONS, LLC; GLOBAL
`
`PRODUCE SALES, INC.; STEPHEN ROSS )
`NICHOLS; LEE ALLEN WROTEN, III; and, )
`MARK A. ELLIOTT,
`
`
`
`)
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`)
`
`UCOMPLAINT
`
`1.
`
`For its Complaint against Defendants, Herman Curt Titshaw (“Titshaw”);
`
`Crisp Melons, Inc. (“Crisp”); Summer Time Melons, LLC (“Summer Time”);
`
`Global Produce Sales, Inc. (“Global”); Stephen Ross Nichols (“Nichols”); Lee
`
`Allen Wroten, III (“Wroten”); and Mark A. Elliott (“Elliott”) (Crisp, Summer
`
`Time, Global, Nichols, Wroten, and Elliott are sometimes collectively referred to
`
`as the “Buyer Defendants”), Plaintiff OneSouth Bank states as follows:
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`2.
`
`This Court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 7 U.S.C. §
`
`1631, the Food Security Act, and supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 1331 and 1338 as this action alleges third party misappropriation of property
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 2 of 22
`
`that was subject to a perfected security interest under 7 U.S.C. § 1631. This Court
`
`has supplemental jurisdiction over the Bank’s related state and common law
`
`claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338 and 1367 as the state and common law
`
`claims arise out of the common nucleus of operative facts.
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2),
`
`as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred
`
`in this District.
`
`PARTIES
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff OneSouth Bank (“Bank”) is a state-chartered bank organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Georgia (Control Number J715964) with its
`
`principal place of business located at 12347 Columbia Street, Blakely, Georgia
`
`39823.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant Herman Curt Titshaw (“Titshaw”) is a resident of the State of
`
`Georgia with his principal place of residence located at 2016 16th Ave E., Cordele,
`
`Georgia 31015.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Crisp Melons, Inc. (“Crisp”) is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Georgia (Control Number 0001485) with
`
`its principal office address located at PO Box 827, Lakeland, Florida 33815 and its
`
`registered agent, Stephen Ross Nichols, located at 1176 Highway 280 W.,
`
`Cordele, Georgia 31015.
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 3 of 22
`
`7.
`
`Defendant Summer Time Melons, LLC (“Summer Time”) is a limited
`
`liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia
`
`(Control Number 17029120) with its principal office address located at 1176
`
`Highway 280 West, Cordele, Georgia 31015 and its registered agent, J. Mitchell
`
`Gibbs, located at 109 E. 14th Ave., Cordele, Georgia 31015.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant Global Produce Sales, Inc. (“Global”) is a corporation organized
`
`and existing under the laws of the State of Florida with its principal address
`
`located at 1018 E. Oleander Street, Lakeland, Florida 33815 and its registered
`
`agent, Mark A. Elliott, located at 1018 E. Oleander Street, Lakeland, Florida
`
`33801.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant Stephen Ross Nichols (“Nichols”) is
`
`a resident of the State of Florida who may be served at 5025 Lake in the Woods
`
`Blvd., Lakeland, Florida 33813.
`
`10. On information and belief, Defendant Lee Allen Wroten, III (“Wroten”) is a
`
`resident of the State of Florida who may be served at 6065 Mountain Lake Dr.,
`
`Lakeland, Florida 33813.
`
`11. On information and belief, Defendant Mark A. Elliott (“Elliott”) is a
`
`resident of the State of Florida who may be served at 1398 Grove Ter., Winter
`
`Park, Florida 32789.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 4 of 22
`
`The Loan and Promissory Note
`
`12. On information and belief, Herman Curt Titshaw is an agricultural
`
`producer specializing in watermelon production.
`
`13.
`
`Titshaw is, and at all times relevant hereto has been, a resident of Crisp
`
`County, Georgia.
`
`14. On November 29, 2018, Titshaw executed a promissory note (the “Note”),
`
`loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), a commercial loan agreement (the
`
`“Commercial Loan Agreement”), and security agreement (the “Security
`
`Agreement”) in favor of the Bank in exchange for the operating funds necessary
`
`to conduct his 2019 watermelon production.
`
`15.
`
`The Note is in the face amount of $1,300,000.00 and has a maturity date of
`
`November 29, 2019. The Note required Titshaw to make a single payment of all
`
`unpaid principal and accrued interest on or before said maturity date with an
`
`interest rate of 7.25%. A true and accurate copy of the Note is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit A.
`
`16.
`
`The Loan Agreement and the Commercial Loan Agreement provide the
`
`terms and conditions under which the Note is governed and the referenced loan
`
`is to be administered. A true and accurate copy of the Loan Agreement is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit B and a true and accurate copy of the Commercial
`
`Loan Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 5 of 22
`
`17.
`
`The Loan Agreement, with reference to the Note, contains the following
`
`provisions regarding the Loan that are pertinent to this matter:
`
`a) Security - To secure payment of the [N]ote and all modifications,
`extensions, renewals, and obligations, Titshaw granted the Bank a
`first lien security interest in all of Titshaw's then owned and
`thereafter acquired interests in the collateral as described in the
`corresponding Security Agreement. Titshaw further granted the
`Bank a security interest in that real property owned by Titshaw and
`located in Land Lot 168, District 10, Crisp County, Georgia that is
`perfected by that Security Deed to the Bank recorded in Book 993,
`Page 153, Land Records of Crisp County, Georgia.
`
`(b) Loan Purpose - Titshaw certified that that proceeds from the
`[N]ote were being used for 2019 Crop Production.
`
`(c) Affirmative Covenants - In addition to all of the other covenants
`set forth in the [N]ote, corresponding Loan Agreement and Security
`Agreement, or other obligations, Titshaw represented and
`warranted that Titshaw would maintain proper books, records, and
`accounts of his operation, would provide annual financial
`statements and tax returns to the Bank, would advise the Bank of
`any change or event which will materially affect the financial
`condition or performance of Titshaw, would timely pay to the Bank
`the proceeds derived from any sale or other disposition of the crops
`subject to the security interest described herein, and that Titshaw
`would immediately report to the Bank any crop loss or other
`collateral loss.
`
`(d) Events of Default - Upon the occurrence of an "Event of Default,"
`as defined in the corresponding Loan Agreement or other
`obligations, the Bank could, at its option, without any demand or
`notice whatsoever, declare the [N]ote and all other obligations to be
`fully due and payable in their aggregate amount, together with
`accrued interest and all prepayment premiums, fees, and charges
`applicable thereto.
`
`(e) Remedies - Upon the occurrence of an "Event of Default," the
`Bank could, at its option, cease making advances under the [N]ote (if
`the [N]ote allowed for such advances), declare the [N]ote and all
`
`-5-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 6 of 22
`
`other obligations of Titshaw to be fully due and payable in their
`aggregate amount together with accrued interest plus any applicable
`prepayment premiums, fees, and charges. In addition to other
`remedies permitted by law, the Bank could at any time, without
`notice, apply the collateral to the [N]ote and/or other obligations,
`whether due or not, and the Bank could, at its option, proceed to
`enforce and protect its rights by an action at law or in equity or by
`any other appropriate proceedings.
`
`(f) Late Payments; Default Rates; Fees - The parties agreed that if any
`payment under the [N]ote is not made when due (whether by
`acceleration or otherwise) or within ten days thereafter, Titshaw
`would pay the Bank a late payment fee of ten percent (10%) of the
`payment amount or $250.00, whichever is less. In addition, the
`parties agreed to post-maturity interest at fifteen percent (15%) or
`the maximum amount allowed by law, whichever is less and cost of
`collection, including attorneys’ fees as described below.
`
`(g) Modification; Waiver of Secured Party - The parties agreed that
`the modification or waiver of any Titshaw obligation or the Bank’s
`rights under the [N]ote must be contained in writing and signed by
`the Bank.
`
`(h) Governing Law - The parties agreed that the laws of the State of
`Georgia govern the construction of the [N]ote and the rights,
`remedies and duties of the parties.
`
`(i) Attorneys' Fees - The parties agreed that in the event of Titshaw’s
`default under the [N]ote (including the documents and instruments
`referred to in the [N]ote), the Bank is entitled to attorneys' fees and
`other costs equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the total amount of
`Titshaw’s default.
`
`(j) Due on Sale or Encumbrance – The parties agreed that upon the
`creation of, or contract for the creation of, any lien, encumbrance,
`transfer, or sale of all or any part of the property subject to the
`Bank’s security interest, the Bank may, at its option, declare the
`entire balance of the [N]ote immediately due and payable.
`
`The Security Agreement
`
`-6-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 7 of 22
`
`18.
`
`The Security Agreement granted to the Bank a security interest in, among
`
`other things, all crops and proceeds of crops owned by Titshaw. A true and
`
`correct copy of the Security Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit D and
`
`incorporated herein by this reference.
`
`19.
`
`Pursuant to its terms, the Security Agreement was made as collateral
`
`security for: (a) the Note and (b) all present and future debts from Titshaw to the
`
`Bank.
`
`20.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement, Titshaw granted to the
`
`Bank a security interest in the following:
`
`(a) all farm products, including all annual and perennial crops, of
`any type or description, including, but not limited to cotton,
`peanuts, corn, soybeans, produce, vegetables, sweet corn and wheat,
`as well as hay, grass, grain and other feeds and forage, now or
`hereafter planted, grown or located on land owned or rented by
`Titshaw and all such crops acquired, wherever stored, together with
`all products of any of the foregoing, and all proceeds of any sale or
`disposition of any of the foregoing;
`
`(b) an assignment of the proceeds of any crop insurance obtained
`with respect to the crops described in Paragraph 20(a), as well as the
`proceeds of and/or participation in any and all governmental
`programs relating to said crops or land owned or rented by Titshaw,
`whether such proceeds relate to crop disaster, price support, land
`diversions, or other programs;
`
`(c) all payments, accounts, general intangibles, or other benefits
`(including, but not limited to, price support payments, payments in
`kind, deficiency payments, disaster payments, letters of entitlement,
`warehouse receipts, storage payments, emergency assistance
`payments, diversion payments, counter-cyclical payments, loan
`deficiency payments, and conservation reserve payments) in which
`
`-7-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 8 of 22
`
`Titshaw now has, or may have in the future any rights or interest or
`which may relate, in any fashion, to the above-described crops, or
`the land owned or rented by Titshaw, and which arise under or as a
`result of any pre-existing, current, or future federal or state
`governmental programs (including, but not limited to, all programs
`administered by the Commodity Credit Corporation, the FSA
`and/or the ASCS); and,
`
`(d) all cash and non-cash proceeds of the foregoing.
`
`21. As required by the Security Agreement, Titshaw, on November 29, 2018
`
`supplied to the Bank a list of buyers, commission merchants, selling agents and
`
`auctioneers to or through whom he may sell the farm products described in the
`
`Security Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Section 1324 of the Food
`
`Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. § 1631 (the “Certification of Potential Buyers”), so
`
`that the Bank could give notices required by, and enjoy the protections afforded
`
`by, Section 1324 of the Food Security Act1. Contained within the Certification of
`
`Potential Buyers is Titshaw’s agreement to update this list by providing the Bank
`
`with any additions or deletions immediately upon becoming aware of such
`
`changes. A true and correct copy of the Certification of Potential Buyers is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit E.
`
`
`1 The Food Security Act (“FSA”) was enacted by Congress in order to protect purchasers of farm products who a)
`do not know that the sale of the products violates a pre-existing security interest and b) lack any practical method for
`discovering the existence of the security interest (see 7 U.S.C. § 1631(a)(1)) from enforcement of a pre-existing
`security interest resulting in double payment to both the seller and the security holder (see 7 U.S.C. § 1631(a)(2)).
`Under the FSA, a lender can preserve its security interest by writing directly to prospective agricultural buyers,
`warning them of the lender's interest in a particular producer's farm products, and requiring that all checks for those
`farm products should include the lender's name as a co-payee. See 7 U.S.C. § 1631(e)(1)(A).
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 9 of 22
`
`22.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement, an "Event of Default"
`
`takes place when any one of the following occurs:
`
`(a) Titshaw fails to make the required payment towards the
`principal or interest on the Note, or towards any other obligation,
`when due;
`
`(b) any representation or warranty of Titshaw set forth in any
`agreement, instrument, document, certificate or financial statement
`evidencing, guarantying, securing or otherwise provided to the
`Bank in connection with the Note, or any other obligation, is
`materially inaccurate or misleading;
`
`(c) Titshaw fails to observe or perform any term or condition in the
`Note or any other term or condition set forth in any agreement,
`instrument, document, certificate or financial statement evidencing,
`guarantying or otherwise related to the Note;
`
`(d) the insolvency or bankruptcy of Titshaw; and,
`
`(e) any sale, conveyance or transfer of any rights in the property
`securing the obligations under the Security Agreement, or any
`destruction, loss or damage of or to the said property in any material
`respect.
`
`23.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement, when an "Event of
`
`Default" occurs, the Bank shall have all rights and remedies in and against the
`
`property securing the obligations under the Security Agreement and otherwise
`
`of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code of Georgia, as well as all
`
`other applicable laws and all rights contained in the Security Agreement, in the
`
`Note, and in all other instruments securing or related to the Note and/or
`
`Titshaw’s other obligations to the Bank.
`
`-9-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 10 of 22
`
`24.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement, no delay on the part of
`
`the Bank in the exercise of any such right or remedy shall operate as a waiver. No
`
`single or partial exercise by the Bank of any right or remedy shall preclude any
`
`other further exercise of it or the exercise of any other right or remedy. No
`
`waiver or indulgence by the Bank of any "Event of Default" shall be effective
`
`unless in writing and signed by the Bank, nor shall a waiver on one occasion be
`
`construed as a waiver of any other occurrence in the future.
`
`25.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement, the laws of the State of
`
`Georgia govern the construction of the Security Agreement and the rights,
`
`remedies and duties of the parties thereto.
`
`26.
`
`Pursuant to the terms of the Security Agreement, the parties agreed that
`
`service of process in any such proceeding relating to the Security Agreement
`
`shall be effective if mailed to Titshaw at the address set forth in the Security
`
`Agreement. The address listed in the Security Agreement for Titshaw is 454
`
`Byrds Mill Road, Cordele, Georgia 31015.
`
`Perfection of the Bank’s Security Interests
`
`27.
`
`In accordance with Section 1324 of the Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. §
`
`1631, the Bank mailed notice of its security interest to Crisp Melons, Inc. at 1176
`
`Highway 280 W., Cordele, Georgia 31015 (the “Notice of Security Interest”) on
`
`-10-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 11 of 22
`
`November 29, 2018. A true and correct copy of the Notice of Security Interest is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit F and incorporated herein by this reference.
`
`28.
`
`The Bank filed with the County Clerks of Sumter, Lee, and Pulaski
`
`Counties, in the State of Georgia, as required by Georgia law, UCC Financing
`
`Statements on or about the second week of January 2019, identifying as
`
`collateral, among other things, all crops and proceeds owned by Titshaw. True
`
`and correct copies of the said UCC Financing Statements are attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit G and incorporated herein by this reference.
`
`29.
`
`The State of Georgia does not maintain a central filing system as defined
`
`under the Food Security Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1631.
`
`Titshaw Defaults on the Loan
`
`30. On August 12, 2019 and August 16, 2019, Titshaw made two partial
`
`payments towards the principal and interest due under the note by first paying
`
`$250,000.00 to the Bank and then paying $9,900.47 to the Bank.
`
`31.
`
`Titshaw defaulted on the Note by failing to make payments on the
`
`remaining principal and interest due before November 29, 2019, the final
`
`maturity date under the Note (the “Default”).
`
`32.
`
`By letter dated June 2, 2020, the Bank, through counsel, notified Titshaw of
`
`his default under the terms of the Note and the Security Agreement and
`
`demanded payment of $491,487.15 plus ongoing interest accruing at $85.91 per
`
`-11-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 12 of 22
`
`day (the “Titshaw Demand Letter”). A true and correct copy of the said Titshaw
`
`Demand Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit H and incorporated herein by this
`
`reference.
`
`The Buyer Defendants
`
`33.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that between about
`
`June 1, 2019 and about July 31, 2019, Titshaw caused watermelons owned and
`
`possessed by Titshaw and subject to the Bank's security interest to be delivered
`
`from Titshaw's possession in Georgia to the possession and control of the Buyer
`
`Defendants.
`
`34.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that between about
`
`June 1, 2019 and about July 31, 2019, the Buyer Defendants, as a selling agent,
`
`commission merchant, or otherwise, sold to third-party buyers the watermelons
`
`owned by Titshaw which were subject to the Bank's security interest and
`
`received the proceeds from the sale of such watermelons.
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the Buyer
`
`Defendants exerted dominion and control over the watermelons and the
`
`proceeds of the watermelons of Titshaw in which the Bank had a perfected and
`
`superior security interest.
`
`-12-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 13 of 22
`
`36. At no time did the Bank authorize the sale or disposition of any
`
`watermelons owned by Titshaw and in the possession of the Buyer Defendants
`
`free and clear of the Bank's perfected security interest, or otherwise.
`
`37.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that for each of the
`
`lots of watermelons owned by and sold on behalf of Titshaw, the Buyer
`
`Defendants deducted or set-off from the proceeds derived from the sale of the
`
`watermelons the costs and expenses incurred by the Buyer Defendants, including
`
`but not limited to processing costs, freight charges, and interest.
`
`38.
`
`The Bank did not consent to the Buyer Defendants retaining proceeds from
`
`the sale of the subject watermelons.
`
`39. At no time relevant did the Bank receive written notice from any party that
`
`the Buyer Defendants were claiming or would claim a lien on any of the
`
`watermelons or proceeds of the watermelons for the costs and expenses related
`
`to the sale of the watermelons or for interest or for any other charge.
`
`40. None of the checks issued by any of the Buyer Defendants for any of the
`
`watermelons sold, as described above, were made jointly payable to the Bank.
`
`41.
`
`The market value for the watermelons produced by Titshaw in which the
`
`Bank had a perfected and superior security interest at the time said watermelons
`
`were sold was not less than $491,487.15.
`
`-13-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 14 of 22
`
`42. At all times herein mentioned, each of the Buyer Defendants participated
`
`in the acts hereinafter alleged to have been done by the Buyer Defendants, and
`
`furthermore, at all times herein mentioned, the acts and omissions of the Buyer
`
`Defendants, and each of them, concurred and contributed to the various acts and
`
`omissions of each in proximately causing the injuries and damages as herein
`
`alleged in Count II.
`
`43.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times
`
`herein alleged, the Buyer Defendants, and each of them, were the successor,
`
`assign, affiliate, subsidiary, or representative of each of the remaining parties
`
`described as Buyer Defendants herein and was acting within the course and
`
`scope of such succession, assignment, affiliation, subordination, or
`
`representation at all material times herein. Each of the Buyer Defendants,
`
`whether acting for itself or otherwise, is in some way responsible for the injuries
`
`and damages as hereinafter alleged.
`
`44.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times
`
`herein alleged, the Buyer Defendants, and each of them, ratified the acts or
`
`omission complained of within Count II herein.
`
`45.
`
`By letters dated September 9, 2020, the Bank, through counsel, demanded
`
`that the Buyer Defendants transmit all proceeds retained by the Buyer
`
`Defendants from any sale of the watermelons produced by Titshaw to the Bank
`
`-14-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 15 of 22
`
`within 10 days of their receipt of said demand letters (collectively the “Buyer
`
`Defendants Demand Letters”). To date, Buyer Defendants have refused to
`
`comply with the terms of the Buyer Defendants Demand Letters. True and
`
`correct copies of the said Buyer Defendants Demand Letters are attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit I and incorporated herein by this reference.
`
`Common Identity of Buyer Defendants
`
`46.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that, at all times
`
`relevant hereto, there existed a unity of interest and ownership between
`
`defendants Crisp, Summer Time, Global, Nichols, Wroten, and Elliott such that
`
`any individuality and separateness between defendants Crisp, Summer Time,
`
`Global, Nichols, Wroten, and Elliott has ceased, and each of said defendants is
`
`the alter ego of the other defendants described herein in that said defendants,
`
`and/or their principal owners, exert control over the other defendants described
`
`herein to the extent there is no separation of identity.
`
`47. Adherence to the fiction of the separate existence of each of the Buyer
`
`Defendants as distinct entities and individuals would permit an abuse of
`
`corporate privilege and would sanction fraud and promote injustice in that said
`
`defendants could avoid obligations that said defendants are otherwise liable for.
`
`48.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Nichols, Wroten,
`
`and Elliott own all the equity in and/or control all the activities of Crisp,
`
`-15-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 16 of 22
`
`Summer Time, and Global, and have moved assets freely between the entities for
`
`their own benefit.
`
`49.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that, during all
`
`times in question, Nichols, Wroten, and Elliott have failed to follow corporate
`
`formalities in regards to Crisp, Summer Time, and Global and have left said
`
`corporate entities undercapitalized.
`
`50.
`
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that, during all
`
`times and events in question, the Buyer Defendants acted under the name of, or
`
`held themselves out as part of, Crisp, an entity that has since been
`
`administratively dissolved by the Georgia Secretary of State for non-payment of
`
`annual registration fees, rather than conducting business in the appropriate
`
`names and entities.
`
`COUNT I – Breach of Contract
`[Defendant Titshaw]
`
`The Bank incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs
`
`
`51.
`
`1 through 50, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`The Note is a valid and enforceable contract between the Bank and Titshaw.
`
`The Bank has performed its obligations under the Note and has satisfied all
`
`conditions precedent to its enforcement.
`
`54.
`
`Titshaw has breached the terms of the Note by, among other things, failing
`
`to pay all remaining principal and interest due on November 29, 2019.
`
`-16-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 17 of 22
`
`55.
`
`Pursuant to the Note, Titshaw’s default under the Note entitles the Bank to
`
`accelerate the principal balance and all accrued interest due and owing under the
`
`Note.
`
`56.
`
`Titshaw has failed to cure his breach of the Note, despite written demand to
`
`do so.
`
`57.
`
`Pursuant to the Security Agreement, if Titshaw defaults under the Note, the
`
`Bank is entitled to all remedies provided for in the Security Agreement.
`
`58. As a direct and proximate result of Titshaw’s breach of the Note, and Bank's
`
`acceleration of all amounts owed by Titshaw to the Bank, the Bank has suffered
`
`and continues to suffer damages that, as of June 2, 2020 are in the amount of
`
`$491,487.15 plus all interest that will continue to accrue, together with applicable
`
`late charges, attorneys' fees, and other costs of collection. The Bank is also entitled
`
`to all remedies provided for in the Loan Agreement and Security Agreement.
`
`59.
`
`Pursuant to the Note, the Bank is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and
`
`costs incurred, with interest accruing thereon, due to the Bank’s enforcement of
`
`the terms of the Note and the Security Agreement2.
`
`COUNT II - Conversion/Misappropriation of Collateral and Proceeds
`[Buyer Defendants]
`
`
`
`2 See Paragraph 9 of the Security Agreement and page 4 of the Loan Agreement under the heading “Demand and
`Post Default Rights”.
`
`-17-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 18 of 22
`
`60.
`
`The Bank incorporates by reference the allegations contained in
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 59, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`61.
`
`The Bank, through its security interest, had rights in the watermelon crop
`
`and the proceeds of the watermelons owned by Titshaw.
`
`62.
`
`The Bank's security interest in the watermelon crop and the proceeds of
`
`the watermelon crop owned by Titshaw was perfected due to the filing of Bank's
`
`UCC Financing Statements in Sumter, Lee, and Pulaski Counties and the sending
`
`of the Notice of Security Interest to the Buyer Defendants through their
`
`predecessor, affiliate, and/or Subsidiary Crisp.
`
`63.
`
`The Bank's perfected security interest in the watermelon crop and the
`
`proceeds of the watermelons owned by Titshaw was superior to any rights that
`
`the Buyer Defendants had or may have had in the watermelons.
`
`64. At no time relevant did the Bank authorize the disposition of any proceeds
`
`of any watermelons owned by Titshaw free and clear of the Bank's perfected
`
`security interest.
`
`65.
`
`The dominion and control exerted by the Buyer Defendants over the
`
`watermelon crop and seizure and retention of the proceeds of watermelons in
`
`which the Bank had a security interest was unauthorized and wrongful due to
`
`Buyer Defendants selling such watermelons without the express authorization of
`
`the Bank, deducting or offsetting interest and costs and expenses from the sale
`
`-18-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 19 of 22
`
`proceeds, and remitting the proceed from the sale of the watermelons to Titshaw
`
`without including the Bank's name on the check.
`
`66.
`
`The unauthorized and wrongful dominion and control exerted by the
`
`Buyer Defendants over the watermelon crop and the proceeds of the
`
`watermelons in which the Bank had a perfected security interest has deprived
`
`the Bank of its rights, as a secured party, in the watermelon crop and the
`
`proceeds from the watermelons.
`
`67.
`
`The Buyer Defendants have failed to return to the Bank the proceeds of the
`
`watermelon crop, despite written demand to do so.
`
`68.
`
`The Buyer Defendants further failed to comply with the Food Security Act3
`
`and the Uniform Commercial Code4 by failing to pay the Bank the proceeds from
`
`the sale of Titshaw’s watermelon crop, as described above.
`
`
`3 7 U.S.C.S. § 1631(e) provides in part: A buyer of farm products takes subject to a security interest created by the
`seller if within one year before the sale of the farm products, the buyer has received from the secured party or the
`seller written notice of the security interest organized according to farm products that: (i) is an original or
`reproduced copy thereof; and (ii) contains the name and address of the secured party, the name and address of the
`person indebted to the secured party, the social security number of the debtor or, in the case of a debtor doing
`business other than as an individual, the Internal Revenue Service taxpayer identification number of such debtor, a
`description of the farm products subject to the security interest created by the debtor, including the amount of such
`products where applicable, crop year, county, or parish, and a reasonable description of the property.
`
`4Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, codified at Title 11, Article 9 of the Georgia Code, governs secured
`transactions, in which a debtor grants a creditor a security interest in personal property as collateral to secure a debt,
`making the creditor a secured party. O.C.G.A. § 11-9-109. Three conditions must be met before a security interest is
`enforceable against anyone. First, unless the secured party possesses the collateral, there must be a written security
`agreement signed by the debtor and containing a description of the collateral. Second, the secured party must have
`given value to the debtor. And third, the debtor must have "rights in the collateral." O.C.G.A. 11-9-203(b). If all
`three conditions are met, the secured party's security interest has been properly "attached" to the collateral.
`
`-19-
`
`

`

`Case 5:20-cv-00379-MTT Document 1 Filed 09/28/20 Page 20 of 22
`
`69. As a result of the Buyer Defendants’ actions, the Bank has incurred
`
`damages in an amount not less than $ 491,487.15.
`
`COUNT III – Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 13-6-11
`[Buyer Defendants]
`
`70.
`
`The Bank incorporates by reference the allegations contained in
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 69, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`71.
`
`The Buyer Defendant’s conversion of the Bank’s property has caused
`
`unnecessary trouble and expense. Their conduct prior to the lawsuit being filed
`
`was in bad faith as contemplated under O.C.G.A. § 13-6-11: "bad faith connected
`
`with the transaction and dealings out of which the cause of action arose, rather
`
`than bad faith in defending or resisting the claim after the cause of action has
`
`already arisen." Brown v. Baker, 197 Ga. App. 466, 398 S.E.2d 797 (1990). Buyer
`
`Defendants ignored the Bank’s security interest in the watermelon crop and
`
`refused to pay the Bank the proceeds from the sale of Titshaw’s watermelon crop
`
`after demands made by the Bank. Such bad faith has led to the filing of this
`
`lawsuit, and, accordingly, the Bank is entitled to recove

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket