throbber
Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`
`ANNEMARIE TARARA, Individually and
`On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
`
`
`
`
`
`TREEHOUSE FOODS, INC., SAM K.
`REED, and DENNIS F. RIORDAN,
`
`
`
`
` Case No.: 16-CV-10632
`
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR
`VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL
`SECURITIES LAWS
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 2 of 23 PageID #:2
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Annemarie Tarara (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorneys, alleges the
`
`following upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which
`
`are alleged upon personal knowledge. Plaintiff’s information and belief is based upon, among
`
`other things, her counsel’s investigation, which includes without limitation: (a) review and
`
`analysis of regulatory filings made by TreeHouse Foods, Inc., (“TreeHouse” or the “Company”),
`
`with the United States (“U.S.”) Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); (b) review and
`
`analysis of press releases and media reports issued by and disseminated by TreeHouse; and (c)
`
`review of other publicly available information concerning TreeHouse.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION AND OVERVIEW
`
`1.
`
`This is a class action on behalf of persons and entities that acquired TreeHouse
`
`securities between February 1, 2016, and November 2, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”),
`
`against the Defendants, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
`
`(the “Exchange Act”).
`2.
`
`TreeHouse is a food manufacturer that operates approximately 24 manufacturing
`
`facilities in the United States and Canada. The Company’s stated goal is to be a leading supplier
`
`of private label food and products including coffee-creamer, canned soups, salad dressings, salsa
`
`and Mexican sauces, jams and pie fillings.
`3.
`
`On February 1, 2016, TreeHouse announced that it completed the acquisition
`
`of ConAgra Foods, Inc.’s (“ConAgra’s”) private brands operations. The Company stated that it
`
`paid $2.7 billion in cash plus transaction expenses for the business. TreeHouse touted the
`
`acquisition as a boon to the Company, stating, “[t]he acquisition of ConAgra’s private brands
`
`operations meaningfully expands TreeHouse’s presence in private label dry and refrigerated
`
`grocery, and will be called TreeHouse Private Brands.”
`4.
`
`Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading
`
`statements regarding
`
`the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically,
`
`Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the
`
`Company’s private label business was underperforming; (2) the Company’s acquisition strategy
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`1
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 3 of 23 PageID #:3
`
`
`
`was underperforming; (3) that the Company had overstated its full-year 2016 guidance; and (4)
`
`that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about TreeHouse’s business, operations,
`
`and prospects, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
`5.
`
`On November 3, 2016, TreeHouse lowered its full year adjusted earnings per
`
`share forecast to $2.80-$2.85, from $3.00-$3.10 due to underperformance of the Private Brands
`
`acquisition and over softness in the private label manufacturing business. The Company also
`
`announced the closure of a plant in Delta, British Columbia, and reported job cuts at its facility
`
`in Battle Creek, Michigan.
`6.
`
`The Company also surprised investors by announcing the resignation of its newly-
`
`appointed President, Chris Sliva, who had been President for less than six months, and the
`
`appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer.
`7.
`
`On the above news, the Company’s shares fell $16.87 per share, or nearly 20%, to
`
`close at $69.72 per share on November 3, 2016.
`8.
`
`As a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts and omissions, and the precipitous
`
`decline in the market value of the Company’s securities, Plaintiff and other Class members have
`
`suffered significant losses and damages.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`The claims asserted herein arise under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange
`
`Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a)) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the SEC (17
`
`C.F.R. § 240.10b-5).
`10.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1331 and Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa).
`11.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and
`
`Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa(c)). Substantial acts in furtherance of the
`
`alleged fraud or the effects of the fraud have occurred in this Judicial District. Many of the acts
`
`charged herein, including the dissemination of materially false and/or misleading information,
`
`occurred in substantial part in this Judicial District, as TreeHouse is headquartered in this district.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`2
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 4 of 23 PageID #:4
`
`
`
`12.
`
`In connection with the acts, transactions, and conduct alleged herein, Defendants
`
`directly and indirectly used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including the
`
`United States mail, interstate telephone communications, and the facilities of a national securities
`
`exchange.
`
`PARTIES
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff Annemarie Tarara, as set forth in the accompanying certification,
`
`incorporated by reference herein, purchased TreeHouse common stock during the Class Period,
`
`and suffered damages as a result of the federal securities law violations and false and/or
`
`misleading statements and/or material omissions alleged herein.
`14.
`
`Defendant TreeHouse is incorporated in Delaware, and the Company’s principal
`
`executive offices are located in Oak Brook, Illinois. TreeHouse’s common stock trades on the
`
`New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “THS.”
`15.
`
`Defendant Sam K. Reed (“Reed”) has served at all relevant times as the
`
`Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.
`16.
`
`Defendant Dennis F. Riordan (“Riordan”) served at all relevant times as the
`
`Company’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and currently serves as the Company’s President
`
`effective November 3, 2016.
`17.
`
`Defendants Reed and Riordan (collectively the “Individual Defendants”), because
`
`of their positions with the Company, possessed the power and authority to control the contents of
`
`TreeHouse’s reports to the SEC, press releases and presentations to securities analysts, money
`
`and portfolio managers and institutional investors, i.e., the market. The Individual Defendants
`
`were provided with copies of the Company’s reports and press releases alleged herein to be
`
`misleading prior to, or shortly after, their issuance and had the ability and opportunity to prevent
`
`their issuance or cause them to be corrected. Because of their positions and access to material
`
`non-public information available to them, the Individual Defendants knew that the adverse facts
`
`specified herein had not been disclosed to, and were being concealed from, the public, and that
`
`the positive representations which were being made were then materially false and/or
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`3
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 5 of 23 PageID #:5
`
`
`
`misleading. The Individual Defendants are liable for the false statements pleaded herein.
`SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS
`
`
`Materially False and Misleading
`Statements Issued During the Class Period
`
`18.
`
`The Class Period begins on February 1, 2016. On that day the Company issued a
`
`press release announcing the completion of its acquisition of ConAgra’s private brands
`
`operations, stating:
`
`OAK BROOK, Ill., Feb. 1, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- TreeHouse Foods (NYSE:
`THS) announced today that it has completed the acquisition of ConAgra
`Foods’ (NYSE: CAG) private brands operations. TreeHouse paid $2.7 billion in
`cash plus transaction expenses for the business and financed the transaction
`through the closing of its previously announced offerings of $775 million in
`aggregate principal senior notes due 2024 with a 6.0% annual interest rate and
`common stock issuance of 13.3 million shares at a price of $65per share (which
`includes the exercise, in full, of the overallotment option), aggregating $862.5
`millionin gross proceeds. The remainder of the purchase price was financed
`under the Company’s revolving credit facility.
`
`“We are pleased to have closed the acquisition, and will continue to focus on
`driving shareholder value and offering our customers value without compromise
`through economies of scale, quality products and superior customer service,”
`said Sam K. Reed, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
`of TreeHouse Foods.
`
`“The Private Brands acquisition broadens our portfolio of offerings for our
`customers. We remain unwaveringly committed to supporting our customers’
`efforts to build their corporate brands and offer consumers the best combination
`of choice and value,” Mr. Reed continued. “We are looking forward to working
`as one go-to-market team to achieve success and will work tirelessly to develop
`the systems and infrastructure to deliver a seamless integration.”
`
`The acquisition of ConAgra’s private brands operations meaningfully expands
`TreeHouse’s presence in private label dry and refrigerated grocery, and will be
`called TreeHouse Private Brands. Bay Valley Foods (with Flagstone Foods) and
`TreeHouse Private Brands will be the operating platforms of TreeHouse Foods,
`Inc. Following the Private Brands acquisition, TreeHouse Foods, Inc. has pro
`forma sales of approximately $7 billion for the twelve months ended December
`31, 2015, more than 50 manufacturing facilities and over 16,000 employees.
`
`19.
`
`On February 11, 2016, the Company issued a press release announcing fourth
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`4
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 6 of 23 PageID #:6
`
`
`
`quarter 2015 financial results, and announced financial guidance for 2016 of $2.95 to $3.10 in
`
`adjusted earnings per share. For the fourth quarter 2015, the Company announced earnings per
`
`share of $1.08 on net sales of $865.4 million. Commenting on the Company’s results, Defendant
`
`Reed told investors:
`
`We finished the year strong, and our employees deserve a great deal of credit for
`continuing to focus on improving our operations and driving excellent margin
`progress. While overall market conditions remained soft and weakness in the
`Canadian dollar persisted, both of which weighed on our top line, we are very
`proud to have delivered margin expansion of 150 basis points in the fourth
`quarter.
`
`This year marks the beginning of an important journey for us, as we press forward
`with our strategic vision and relentlessly focus on tactical execution. We remain
`fully committed to growth and simplification, and believe that our greatest
`opportunities continue to lie ahead. We remain dedicated to building a private
`label platform that offers a broad portfolio of products that are important to our
`customers and supports their efforts to build their corporate brands, while offering
`consumers the best combination of choice and value.
`
`20.
`
`On February 18, 2016, the Company filed its annual report on Form 10-K with the
`
`SEC. The Company reiterated the results previously published in its press release for the fourth
`
`quarter 2015, and reported earnings per share of $2.67 on net sales of $3.2 billion. The Company
`
`also touted to investors the tremendous growth available for private label manufacturing in the
`
`United States:
`
`According to independent market research studies, private label grocery products
`have increased their market share in the United States from 12.7% in 1989 to
`approximately 17.8% in 2015. Despite gains in market share, private label
`penetration in the United States remains below that of many other developed
`economies, including France (27%), Spain (42%), Germany (35%), the United
`Kingdom (41%) and Switzerland (45%) (market research estimates based on 2014
`data). Over time, we expect private label market share in the United States will
`approach the levels currently present in Europe, but due to structural differences,
`we do not anticipate this in the short term.
`
`21.
`
`On May 5, 2016, the Company issued a press release announcing first quarter
`
`results for the period ended March 31, 2016. Therein, the Company reported earnings per share
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`5
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 7 of 23 PageID #:7
`
`
`
`of $0.48 on net sales of $1.3 billion, “a 62.2% increase from 2015, driven by the Private Brands
`
`acquisition.” The Company also “tightens full year 2016 adjusted earnings per share guidance
`
`range to $3.00 to $3.10,” with Defendant Reed commenting in relevant part:
`
`We delivered sequential progress in the first quarter and are off to a solid start,
`despite the ongoing challenges of a stagnant retail landscape. In the first quarter,
`growth in retail single-serve coffee and broad gains in snacks led our combined
`Bay Valley Foods and TreeHouse Private Brands organization, while our cold
`season products such as non-dairy creamers, hot cereal, and soup were negatively
`affected by the unseasonably warm weather.
`
` I
`
` am very pleased with the progress our teams are making integrating the Private
`Brands business, and our sense of functional unity is growing. Our Private Brands
`team is already making great progress in customer service improvements and is
`starting to regain lost distribution that resulted from past service issues. Our
`integration activities are on track and on budget as a result of the strong
`collaboration of our teams during the transition.
`
`22.
`
`On the same day, May 5, 2016, the Company filed its quarterly report on Form
`
`10-Q with the SEC. The Company reiterated the results previously published in press release
`
`issued earlier that day, and noted its continued focus on expanding the Private Brands business,
`
`and the expected overall growth in the United States private label business.
`23. On August 4, 2016, the Company issued a press release announcing second quarter
`
`results for the period ended June 30, 2016. Therein, the Company reported earnings per share of
`
`$0.27 on net sales of $1.5 billion, “a 103.0% increase from 2015, driven by the Private Brands
`
`acquisition.” The Company also reaffirmed its 2016 outlook, with Defendant Reed commenting
`
`in relevant part:
`
`We continue to progress in accordance with our plans for the year and our second
`quarter results represent further sequential improvement. Total Company revenue
`was up significantly due to the Private Brands acquisition. Volume/mix grew 4%
`in North American Retail Grocery, representing one of our best quarters in many
`years. Our operating results continue to show steady improvement, as we focus
`on customers, categories, consumers, and organizational capabilities.”
`
`The detailed integration of legacy TreeHouse and Private Brands is well
`underway, and we are gaining momentum. I’m pleased to report that we
`completed a virtually flawless integration of the acquired condiments business
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`6
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 8 of 23 PageID #:8
`
`
`
`onto the TreeHouse SAP system in early July, linking seven product categories
`and eleven plants that serve over 500 customers. The work that is being
`undertaken across
`the organization
`to establish standardized processes,
`organizational structures, functional responsibilities and reporting relationships is
`extraordinary and is a testament to the robust level of collaboration within our
`organization.
`
`24.
`
`On the same day, August 4, 2016, the Company filed its quarterly report on Form
`
`10-Q with the SEC. The Company reiterated the results previously published in its August 4,
`
`2016 press release, and noted its continued dominance of the private label food manufacturing
`
`business, the success of the Private Brands acquisition, and the expected growth in the overall
`
`United States private label market.
`25.
`
`On August 4, 2016, the Company announced that Christopher D. Sliva had been
`
`elected President of TreeHouse Foods. Defendant Reed commented on the appointment of Mr.
`
`Sliva:
`
`Chris’ contributions over the last four years have both strengthened and advanced
`our organization and culture. I’m proud of the way Chris has led our Company
`through the operational complexity that is inherent in private label. Because of his
`leadership and efforts to focus our organization on simplification, our legacy
`business has delivered gross margin expansion year in, year out.
`
`Chris has also been the driving force in focusing our organization on the private
`label fundamentals of customers, categories, consumers and organizational
`capabilities. As we look forward, it is under Chris’ tutelage that we are designing
`an organizational structure to deliver on the transformative potential of the
`TreeHouse promise to our customers.
`
`26.
`
`The above statements contained in ¶¶18-25 were materially false and/or
`
`misleading, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business,
`
`operations, and prospects. Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or
`
`misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s
`
`business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading
`
`statements and/or failed to disclose: (1) that the Company’s private label business was
`
`underperforming; (2) that the Company’s acquisition strategy was underperforming; (3) that the
`
`Company had overstated its full-year 2016 guidance; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing,
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`7
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 9 of 23 PageID #:9
`
`
`
`Defendants’ statements about TreeHouse’s business, operations, and prospects, were false and
`
`misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
`
`Disclosures at the End of the Class Period
`
`27.
`
`On November 3, 2016, TreeHouse lowered its full year adjusted earnings per
`
`share forecast to $2.80-$2.85 per share from $3.00-$3.10. In relevant part, the Company stated:
`
`“We are lowering our full year 2016 earnings expectations due to the combination
`of lower than expected third quarter sales from the Private Brands business, along
`with our belief that fourth quarter Private Brands sales will fall short of our goal
`to stem its year-over-year sales declines,” said Mr. Reed. “We do believe this is a
`short term situation. Our new go-to-market sales structure is designed to improve
`our ability to help customers merchandise and drive their private label
`programs. Our resumed focus on our products and customers in the fourth quarter
`will quickly restore our Company to our original expectations for the
`combined TreeHouse Foods business.”
`
`The Company expects fourth quarter GAAP and adjusted earnings to be in the
`range of $1.07 to $1.12per fully diluted share. Because the Company cannot
`predict some of the items included in reported GAAP results, such as the impact
`of foreign exchange, the fourth quarter forecast for both GAAP and adjusted
`earnings are the same. Please refer to the “Comparison of Adjusted Information
`to GAAP Information” below for further detail. With regard to the full year,
`TreeHouse expects GAAP earnings to be in the range of $1.95 to $2.00 per fully
`diluted share and adjusted earnings to be in a range of $2.80 to $2.85 per fully
`diluted share. The difference between the high end and low end of the full year
`GAAP and non-GAAP guidance ranges is consistent with the $0.85 impact of
`adjusting items per fully diluted share for the nine months ended September 30,
`2016, as outlined in the chart above.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant Reed, in commenting on the poor performance of the Private Brands
`
`business, stated in relevant part:
`
`The third quarter was a tale of two cities. Our legacy business continued to
`perform well, paced by Retail volume/mix growth of 4.6% and 80 basis points of
`direct operating income margin expansion. On the other hand, while the Private
`Brands business showed sequential improvement, its results fell short of our
`expectations for the quarter.
`
`We believe the underperformance of the Private Brands business is attributable to
`our all-encompassing efforts to smoothly integrate the operations of the new
`business. While we have made great progress in consolidating plants, stabilizing
`the workforce and reducing our reliance on the transition services, the shift in
`management attention led to less robust Private Brands sales than we experienced
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`8
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 10 of 23 PageID #:10
`
`
`
`in the legacy organization. We will be unveiling a new go-to-market sales
`structure to better align and focus our sales teams to drive new and consistent
`growth.
`
`29.
`
`The Company further announced the closure of a plant in Delta, British Columbia,
`
`and reported job cuts at its facility in Battle Creek, Michigan. In relevant part, the Company
`
`stated:
`
`-- TreeHouse Foods,
`Ill., Nov. 3, 2016 /PRNewswire/
`OAK BROOK,
`Inc. (NYSE: THS) today announced its intention to close a facility in Delta,
`British Columbia and reduce
`its manufacturing footprint in Battle Creek,
`Michigan. The decision follows an analysis of the Company’s plant network to
`align operations with the current and future needs of its customers and eliminate
`excess manufacturing capacity.
`
`The Delta facility employs approximately 90 employees and produces frozen
`griddle products, primarily for the North American Retail Grocery segment.
`Production is expected to cease in early 2018. The Company operates two
`facilities in Delta, and this announcement only affects the frozen griddle facility.
`
`The Battle Creek facility produces ready-to-eat cereal, primarily for the North
`American Retail Grocerysegment. The partial closure will affect approximately
`100 of the current 160 employees over a 15 month period beginning in January
`2017. The decision is being announced in advance of the downsizing in order to
`provide employees with as much notice as possible and to ensure a seamless
`transition for customers.
`
`Both the Battle Creek and Delta griddle facilities were part of the Company’s
`acquisition of the ConAgra Foods private brands business in February 2016. The
`Company will provide support to employees whose positions are being
`eliminated.
`
`Total costs to close the Delta facility and downsize Battle Creek are expected to
`be approximately $14.7 million, or $0.16 per fully diluted share, of which
`approximately $6.8 million, or $0.08 per fully diluted share, is expected to be in
`cash. Components of
`the charges
`include non-cash asset write-offs of
`approximately $7.9 million, employee-related costs of approximately $4.6
`million and other closure costs of approximately $2.2 million. The Company
`expects approximately $4.0 million and $3.1 million of the charges to be incurred
`in the fourth quarter of this year and the first quarter of 2017, respectively, with
`the balance of the charges being incurred through the end of 2018.
`
`30.
`
`Finally, the Company disclosed the resignation of its newly appointed President,
`
`Chirs Sliva, and the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`9
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 11 of 23 PageID #:11
`
`
`
`31.
`
`On this news, the Company’s shares fell $16.87 per share, or nearly 20%, to close
`
`at $69.72 per share on November 3, 2016.
`
`CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
`
`32.
`
`Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 23(a) and (b)(3) on behalf of a class, consisting of all persons and entities that
`
`acquired TreeHouse’s securities between February 1, 2016, and November 2, 2016, inclusive,
`
`and who were damaged thereby (the “Class”). Excluded from the Class are Defendants, the
`
`officers and directors of the Company, at all relevant times, members of their immediate families
`
`and their legal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, and any entity in which Defendants
`
`have or had a controlling interest.
`33.
`
`The members of the Class are so numerous that joinder of all members is
`
`impracticable. Throughout the Class Period, TreeHouse’s common stock actively traded on the
`
`NYSE. While the exact number of Class members is unknown to Plaintiff at this time and can
`
`only be ascertained through appropriate discovery, Plaintiff believes that there are at least
`
`hundreds or thousands of members in the proposed Class. Millions of TreeHouse shares were
`
`traded publicly during the Class Period on the NYSE. As of September 30, 2016, the Company
`
`had 56,729,138 shares of common stock outstanding. Record owners and other members of the
`
`Class may be identified from records maintained by TreeHouse or its transfer agent and may be
`
`notified of the pendency of this action by mail, using the form of notice similar to that
`
`customarily used in securities class actions.
`34.
`
`Plaintiff’s claims are typical of the claims of the members of the Class as all
`
`members of the Class are similarly affected by Defendants’ wrongful conduct in violation of
`
`federal law that is complained of herein.
`35.
`
`Plaintiff will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the members of the
`
`Class and has retained counsel competent and experienced in class and securities litigation.
`36.
`
`Common questions of law and fact exist as to all members of the Class and
`
`predominate over any questions solely affecting individual members of the Class. Among the
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`10
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 12 of 23 PageID #:12
`
`
`
`questions of law and fact common to the Class are:
`
`(a)
`
`whether the federal securities laws were violated by Defendants’ acts as alleged
`
`herein;
`
`(b)
`
`whether statements made by Defendants to the investing public during the Class
`
`Period omitted and/or misrepresented material facts about the business, operations, and prospects
`
`of TreeHouse; and
`
`(c)
`
`to what extent the members of the Class have sustained damages and the proper
`
`measure of damages.
`37.
`
`A class action is superior to all other available methods for the fair and efficient
`
`adjudication of this controversy since joinder of all members is impracticable. Furthermore, as
`
`the damages suffered by individual Class members may be relatively small, the expense and
`
`burden of individual litigation makes it impossible for members of the Class to individually
`
`redress the wrongs done to them. There will be no difficulty in the management of this action as
`
`a class action.
`
`UNDISCLOSED ADVERSE FACTS
`
`38.
`
`The market for TreeHouse’s securities was open, well-developed and efficient at
`
`all relevant times. As a result of these materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or
`
`failures to disclose, TreeHouse’s securities traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class
`
`Period. Plaintiff and other members of the Class purchased or otherwise acquired TreeHouse’s
`
`securities relying upon the integrity of the market price of the Company’s securities and market
`
`information relating to TreeHouse, and have been damaged thereby.
`39.
`
`During the Class Period, Defendants materially misled the investing public,
`
`thereby inflating the price of TreeHouse’s securities, by publicly issuing false and/or misleading
`
`statements and/or omitting to disclose material facts necessary to make Defendants’ statements,
`
`as set forth herein, not false and/or misleading. The statements and omissions were materially
`
`false and/or misleading because they failed to disclose material adverse information and/or
`
`misrepresented the truth about TreeHouse’s business, operations, and prospects as alleged herein.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`11
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 13 of 23 PageID #:13
`
`
`
`40.
`
`At all relevant times, the material misrepresentations and omissions particularized
`
`in this Complaint directly or proximately caused or were a substantial contributing cause of the
`
`damages sustained by Plaintiff and other members of the Class. As described herein, during the
`
`Class Period, Defendants made or caused to be made a series of materially false and/or
`
`misleading statements about TreeHouse’s financial well-being and prospects. These material
`
`misstatements and/or omissions had the cause and effect of creating in the market an
`
`unrealistically positive assessment of the Company and its financial well-being and prospects,
`
`thus causing the Company’s securities to be overvalued and artificially inflated at all relevant
`
`times. Defendants’ materially false and/or misleading statements during the Class Period
`
`resulted in Plaintiff and other members of the Class purchasing the Company’s securities at
`
`artificially inflated prices, thus causing the damages complained of herein when the truth was
`
`revealed.
`
`LOSS CAUSATION
`
`41.
`
`Defendants’ wrongful conduct, as alleged herein, directly and proximately caused
`
`the economic loss suffered by Plaintiff and the Class.
`42.
`
`During the Class Period, Plaintiff and the Class purchased TreeHouse’s securities
`
`at artificially inflated prices and were damaged thereby. The price of the Company’s securities
`
`significantly declined when the misrepresentations made to the market, and/or the information
`
`alleged herein to have been concealed from the market, and/or the effects thereof, were revealed,
`
`causing investors’ losses.
`
`SCIENTER ALLEGATIONS
`
`43.
`
`As alleged herein, Defendants acted with scienter since Defendants knew that the
`
`public documents and statements issued or disseminated in the name of the Company were
`
`materially false and/or misleading; knew that such statements or documents would be issued or
`
`disseminated to the investing public; and knowingly and substantially participated or acquiesced
`
`in the issuance or dissemination of such statements or documents as primary violations of the
`
`federal securities laws. As set forth elsewhere herein in detail, Individual Defendants, by virtue
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`12
`
`

`

`Case: 1:16-cv-10632 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/16/16 Page 14 of 23 PageID #:14
`
`
`
`of their receipt of information reflecting the true facts regarding TreeHouse, their control over,
`
`and/or receipt and/or modification of TreeHouse’s allegedly materially misleading misstatements
`
`and/or their associations with the Company which made him privy to confidential proprietary
`
`information concerning TreeHouse, participated in the fraudulent scheme alleged herein.
`APPLICABILITY OF PRESUMPTION OF RELIANCE
`(FRAUD-ON-THE-MARKET DOCTRINE)
`
`The market for TreeHouse’s securities was open, well-developed and efficient at
`
`44.
`
`all relevant times. As a result of the materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failures
`
`to disclose, TreeHouse’s securities traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.
`
`On July 11, 2016, the Company’s stock price closed at a Class Period high of $104.35 per share.
`
`Plaintiff and other members of the Class purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s
`
`securities relying upon the integrity of the market price of TreeHouse’s securities and market
`
`information relating to TreeHouse, and have been damaged thereby.
`45.
`
`During the Class Period, the artificial inflation of TreeHouse’s stock was caused
`
`by the material misrepresentations and/or omissions particularized in this Complaint causing the
`
`damages sustained by Plaintiff and other members of the Class. As described herein, during the
`
`Class Period, Defendants made or caused to be made a series of materially false and/or
`
`misleading statements about TreeHouse’s business, prospects, and operations. These material
`
`misstatements and/or omissions created an unrealistically positive assessment of TreeHouse and
`
`its business, operations, and prospects, thus causing the price of the Company’s securities to be
`
`artificially inflated at all relevant times, and when disclosed, negatively affected the value of the
`
`Company stock. Defendants’ materially false and/or misleading statements during

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket