`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
`EASTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.: 21-CV-3663
`
`COMPLAINT
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ARAMARK FOOD AND SUPPORT
`SERVICES GROUP, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`TYSON FOODS, INC.; TYSON CHICKEN,
`INC.; TYSON BREEDERS, INC.; TYSON
`POULTRY, INC.; PILGRIM’S PRIDE
`CORPORATION; KOCH FOODS, INC.; JCG
`FOODS OF ALABAMA, LLC; JCG FOODS
`OF GEORGIA, LLC; KOCH MEAT CO.,
`INC.; SANDERSON FARMS, INC.;
`SANDERSON FARMS, INC. (FOOD
`DIVISION); SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
`(PRODUCTION DIVISION); SANDERSON
`FARMS, INC. (PROCESSING DIVISION);
`HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS, INC.; MAR-
`JAC POULTRY, INC.; PERDUE FARMS,
`INC.; PERDUE FOODS, LLC; WAYNE
`FARMS, LLC; SIMMONS FOODS, INC.;
`SIMMONS PREPARED FOODS, INC.; O.K.
`FOODS, INC.; O.K. FARMS, INC.; O.K.
`INDUSTRIES, INC.; HARRISON POULTRY,
`INC.; FOSTER FARMS, LLC; FOSTER
`POULTRY FARMS; NORMAN W. FRIES,
`INC. d/b/a CLAXTON POULTRY FARMS,
`INC.; MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INC.;
`MOUNTAIRE FARMS, LLC; MOUNTAIRE
`FARMS OF DELAWARE, INC.; CASE
`FOODS, INC.; CASE FARMS, LLC; CASE
`FARMS PROCESSING, INC.; and AGRI
`STATS, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-03663 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:2
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. (“Aramark” or
`
`“Plaintiff”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia,
`
`Pennsylvania. Aramark is a food service provider operating in all fifty states and in 19 countries
`
`around the world.
`
`2.
`
`Aramark brings this action on its own behalf and pursuant to assignments with
`
`Sysco Corporation, Single Source, Inc. and their affiliates and predecessors with respect to direct
`
`purchases from Defendants made for Aramark’s food services. Sysco Corporation and Single
`
`Source, Inc. on behalf of themselves and their affiliates and predecessors have assigned federal
`
`antitrust claims based on those direct purchases to Aramark.
`
`3.
`
`Aramark brings this action under the federal antitrust laws against the Defendants
`
`identified below and incorporates by reference the factual allegations and reservations of rights
`
`contained in the Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Amended Consolidated Complaint and Demand for Jury
`
`Trial, filed in In re Broiler Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-08637 (ECF 4243; ECF
`
`4244).
`
`4.
`
`Aramark joins Section II of the Direct Action Plaintiffs’ Amended Consolidated
`
`Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, adding the following to specify the Aramark causes of
`
`action and the Defendants in the Aramark action.
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-03663 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:3
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`Name
`Aramark
`Food and
`Support
`Services
`Group, Inc.
`
`Named Co-
`Conspirators
`Fieldale; Amick;
`George’s; Peco;
`Keystone; Allen
`Harim
`
`
`
`Named
`Defendants1
`Agri Stats;
`Claxton; Foster
`Farms; Harrison;
`House of Raeford;
`Koch; Mar-Jac;
`Mountaire; O.K.
`Foods; Perdue;
`Pilgrim’s Pride;
`Sanderson;
`Simmons; Tyson;
`Wayne; Case
`
`Causes of Action
`
`Count I (Sherman Act
`Claim for all
`Anticompetitive
`Conduct); Count II
`(Sherman Act Claim
`for Output Restriction,
`Pled in the Alternative
`to Count I); Count III
`(Sherman Act Claim
`for GA Dock
`Manipulation, Pled in
`the Alternative to
`Count I)
`
`
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:
`A. Enter joint and several judgments against all Defendants in favor of Plaintiff;
`
`B. Award Plaintiff treble damages, of an amount to be determined at trial, to the maximum
`extent allowed under the federal antitrust laws;
`
`C. Award Plaintiff post-judgment interest as provided by law, with such interest to be awarded
`at the highest legal rate;
`
`D. Award Plaintiff its attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and costs, as provided by law;
`
`E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief to which Plaintiff is entitled.
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38, Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all of
`
`
`
`its claims and issues so triable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The Defendants named in this Complaint include the entire Defendant family of each Defendant
`in this table, identified in Section IV.B of ECF 4243/ECF 4244.
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`Case: 1:21-cv-03663 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:4
`
`
`
`Dated: July 9, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Terence H. Campbell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Philip J. Iovieno
`Lawrence S. Brandman
`Nicholas A. Gravante, Jr.
`Karen C. Dyer
`Jack G. Stern
`Mark A. Singer
`Gillian Groarke Burns
`Elizabeth R. Moore
`CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP
`200 Liberty Street
`New York, NY 10281
`Tel: (212) 504-6000
`Fax: (212) 504-6666
`E-mail: philip.iovieno@cwt.com
`
` lawrence.brandman@cwt.com
`
` nicholas.gravante@cwt.com
`
` karen.dyer@cwt.com
`
` jack.stern@cwt.com
`
` mark.singer@cwt.com
`
`gillian.burns@cwt.com
`
`elizabeth.moore@cwt.com
`
`Terence H. Campbell
`Cotsirilos, Tighe, Streicker,
` Poulos & Campbell
`33 N. Dearborn, Ste. 600
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Tel: (312) 263-0345
`Fax: (312) 263-4670
`E-mail: tcampbell@cotsiriloslaw.com
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`