throbber
No. 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
`INCORPORATED,
`JEFFREY N. SIMMONS,
`TODD S. YOUNG,
`JAMES M. MEER,
`R. DAVID HOOVER,
`KAPILA K. ANAND,
`JOHN P. BILBREY,
`ART A. GARCIA,
`MICHAEL J. HARRINGTON,
`DEBORAH T. KOCHEVAR,
`LAWRENCE E. KURZIUS,
`KIRK MCDONALD,
`DENISE SCOTS-KNIGHT,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 58 PageID #: 1047
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
`INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
`
`
`SANDRA HUNTER Individually and on behalf of
`all others similarly situated,
`MARLA STRAPPE,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`ORDER GRANTNG DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Investors in Elanco Animal Health, Inc.—a publicly traded company based in
`
`Greenfield, Indiana—have filed this purported class action for federal securities
`
`violations on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Elanco stock
`
`between September 20, 2018, and May 6, 2020. Plaintiffs allege that Elanco and its
`
`officers engaged in a scheme to deceive and defraud investors of the true value of
`
`Elanco's common stock in violation of federal securities law. Specifically, Plaintiffs
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 2 of 58 PageID #: 1048
`
`allege that Defendants artificially boosted Elanco's earnings and growth by "stuffing"
`
`product distribution channels "far in excess of end-user demand." This, Plaintiffs argue,
`
`combined with Defendants' false and misleading representations about Elanco's growth
`
`and financial situation, led to the artificial inflation of Elanco's stock prices during the
`
`class period. Due to Defendants' allegedly unlawful actions, Plaintiffs claim that they
`
`were injured by purchasing or acquiring Elanco stock during the class period. We
`
`consider here Defendants' Motion to Dismiss this cause of action for failure to state a
`
`claim, and failure to meet the heightened pleading standards required by these specific
`
`securities violations.
`
`I.
`
`ALLEGATIONS OF FACT
`
`Faced with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a federal securities action, "courts must,
`
`as with any motion to dismiss for failure to plead a claim on which relief can be granted,
`
`accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true," Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues &
`
`Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308, 322 (2007) ("Tellabs II"), and draw all inferences in Plaintiffs'
`
`favor, Bielanski v. County of Kane, 550 F.3d 632, 633 (7th Cir. 2008). However, "we are
`
`not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation." Papasan
`
`v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986). We are also not required to "cast a blind eye to 'facts
`
`alleged in the complaint that undermine the plaintiff's claim.'" Gaines v. Guidant Corp.,
`
`2004 WL 2538374 (S.D. Ind. 2004) (Barker, J.) (quoting Arazie v. Mullane, 2 F.3d 1456,
`
`1465 (7th Cir. 1993)). Except where explicitly noted, the facts described herein are those
`
`alleged by Plaintiffs in their First Amended Complaint.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 3 of 58 PageID #: 1049
`
`A. BACKGROUND AND PARTIES
`
`Plaintiffs include both those persons and entities who purchased Elanco securities
`
`between September 20, 2018, and May 6, 2020, as well as those who acquired Elanco
`
`common stock pursuant to Elanco's merger with Aratana Therapeutics on July 18, 2019.
`
`Lead Plaintiff, Sandra Hunter, filed this class action complaint alleging that Elanco, its
`
`Chief Executive Officer Jeffery N. Simmons, and its Chief Financial Officer Todd S.
`
`Young, made fraudulent misrepresentations by omitting material information relating to
`
`"systemic and undisclosed channel stuffing practices" that caused distributors to purchase
`
`inventory "far in excess of demand" from dozens of public statements.1 Compl. ¶¶ 77, 94-
`
`96, 100-01, 103-11, 113-24, 128-29, 131-43, 145-54, 156-69, 171-81, 184-89, 191-203,
`
`206-13. Plaintiffs argue the omission of this information made Elanco's growth and
`
`revenue figures throughout the class period materially misleading. Plaintiffs also allege
`
`that Elanco's Chief Account Officer James M. Meer and the nine members of Elanco's
`
`Board of Directors, by omitting this information regarding channel stuffing from the
`
`offering materials for Elanco's merger with Arantana Therapeutics, rendered the growth
`
`and revenue calculations within these documents materially misleading as well.2
`
`
`1 Because we decline to reproduce here the twenty-seven challenged statements in their
`entirety—which span sixty pages and consist of single-spaced, block quotations with large
`swathes of unchallenged portions of text—we have summarized and extracted relevant portions
`of the facts section of the briefs. We will address the challenged statements more thoroughly in
`the analysis section.
`2 The individual Defendants from the Elanco's Board of Directors are the Chairman R. David
`Hoover, Kapila K. Anand, John P. Bilbrey, Art A. Garcia, Michael J. Harrington, Deborah T.
`Kochevar, Lawrence E. Kurzius, Kirk McDonald, and Denise Scots-Knight. Compl. ¶¶ 23–33.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 4 of 58 PageID #: 1050
`
`Formerly a business unit of Eli Lilly and Company, Elanco was spun-off into a
`
`standalone, public company after its initial public offering on September 20, 2018.
`
`Elanco develops, manufactures, and markets animal health products for both companion
`
`animals, such as dogs and cats, and food animals, i.e., cattle and poultry. Prior to its
`
`initial public offering, Elanco was the fourth largest animal health company in the world,
`
`with $2.9 billion in revenue in 2017. Docket. No. 38-1, at 7.3 Elanco had reported net
`
`income losses for the three years preceding its initial public offering, with $310.7 million,
`
`$47.9 million, and $210.8 million net income loss in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
`
`Elanco expected to "continue to incur substantial expenditures to develop, manufacture,
`
`and market our products and implement [their] business strategies." Id. at 12.
`
`Elanco generates revenue primarily through product sales to customers, who are
`
`generally not end-users, but rather third-party wholesale distributors of Elanco's products.
`
`These distributors, in turn, sell to customers like veterinary clinics for companion animal
`
`products, or cattle and dairy farms for food animal products. Consistent with generally
`
`accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Elanco generally recognizes revenue at the time
`
`the product is shipped their customers. Id. at 46. Payment terms "differ by jurisdiction
`
`and customer, but payment terms in most of [Elanco's] major jurisdictions typically range
`
`from 30 to 100 days from date of shipment." Id. at 47. Going into the IPO, Elanco had
`
`
`3 Docket No. 38-1 references Elanco's Form S-1 Registration Statement attached to the
`Declaration of Stacy Nettleton in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. In ruling on a
`motion to dismiss, courts may consider judicially noticed documents, including publicly filed
`SEC filings, without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. See
`In re Guidant Corp. Sec. Litig., 536 F. Supp. 2d 913, 921 (S.D. Ind. 2008) (Barker, J.), aff'd sub
`nom. Fannon v. Guidant Corp., 583 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2009).
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 5 of 58 PageID #: 1051
`
`eight primary customers: MWI Animal Health, Covetrus, Inc., Patterson Veterinary,
`
`Midwest Veterinary Supply, K+K Vet Supply Inc., Penn Veterinary Supply, Inc., Victor
`
`Medical Company, Veterinary Service, Inc., and Nutra Blend LLC.
`
`Elanco's contracts with "direct and indirect customers may provide for various rebates
`
`and discounts that may differ in each contract." Id. To determine the appropriate
`
`transaction price for Elanco's product sales at the time it recognizes a sale to a direct
`
`customer, Elanco "must estimate any rebates or discounts that ultimately will be due to
`
`the direct customer and other customers in the distribution chain under the terms of
`
`[their] contracts." Id. "The rebate and discount amounts are recorded as a deduction to
`
`arrive at [their] net product sales." Elanco estimates these accruals using an expected
`
`value approach. Actual product returns were less than two percent of Elanco's net revenue
`
`between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018. Id. at 48. During the first six months of
`
`2018, Elanco's sales rebates and discounts liability in the United States reached $88.6
`
`million, compared to $108.2 million in liability for the first six months of the prior year,
`
`2017. Id.
`
`In the animal health sector, companion animal products generally have higher gross
`
`margins relative to food animal products. Elanco began as a food animal-focused
`
`company, but in the ten years preceding its initial public offering, it had "intentionally
`
`transformed" into a diversified global company. Id. at 7. In addition to Elanco's
`
`established position in Food Animal Ruminants & Swine, the company had sought to
`
`increase its profitability and grow its revenue by establishing positions in three "targeted
`
`growth categories": Companion Animal Disease Prevention, Companion Animal
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 6 of 58 PageID #: 1052
`
`Therapeutics, and Food Animal Future Protein and Health. Id. To establish market
`
`positions in these higher margin categories, Elanco had made "strategic acquisitions" to
`
`expand its product portfolio, increase its sales presence, and obtain Research &
`
`Development and manufacturing capabilities. Id. For example, Elanco licensed
`
`Galliprant—a canine osteoarthritis drug from Aratana Therapeutics in 2016—which
`
`generated ten percent sales growth in their Companion Animal sector in 2017. "As a
`
`result of these acquisitions as well as organic growth," Elanco grew their Companion
`
`Animal categories "from a minimal presence in 2007 to more than $900 million in
`
`revenue in 2017." Id. However, an estimated one-third of Elanco's revenue still came
`
`from its medicated feed additives within its Food Animal Ruminants & Swine category.
`
`Moreover, Elanco's top product, Rumensin, a feed additive for cattle, generated
`
`approximately ten percent of Elanco's total revenue that year. Id.
`
`B. LEAD UP TO ELANCO'S INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
`
`During 2017, according to Confidential Witness 1, Elanco employed a "move out"
`
`style business model which focuses on "creating incentives and opportunities to increase
`
`sales by distributors to the ultimate end-users." Compl. ¶ 48. Confidential Witness 1 was
`
`described as a Corporate Account Manager in Elanco's Large Animal division and was
`
`responsible for managing Elanco's relationship with four distributors—MWI, Midwest,
`
`K+K, and Veterinary Service, Inc. Confidential Witness 1 reported to Director of Food
`
`Animal Channel & Distribution, Courtney Shriver, who reported to Senior Director of
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 7 of 58 PageID #: 1053
`
`Channel Strategy and Sales Force Excellence for North America, Julia Loew, who
`
`reported to Vice President, Companion Animal US, Shawn McKee.
`
`Towards the end of 2017, according to Confidential Witness 2, Elanco introduced a
`
`"sliding scale of margins, adjusted quarterly, based on the amount of product distributors
`
`purchased." Id. ¶ 49. Confidential Witness 2 was a Corporate Account Manager in
`
`Elanco's Companion Animal division and was responsible for contract negotiations and
`
`overseeing the day-to-day management of Elanco's relationship with MWI. Confidential
`
`Witness 2 also reported to Shriver, the Director of Food Animal Channel & Distribution.
`
`Confidential Witness 2 stated, "MWI was held to a certain amount of buy from us, and if
`
`they didn't make it, then their margin dropped." Id. According to Confidential Witness 2,
`
`"[n]obody does this," instead "[y]ou should be able to give your client at least annually
`
`[sic] visibility" on their margins. Id. When making a presentation on the sliding scale of
`
`margins at a conference in 2018, Confidential Witness 2 recalled that MWI executives'
`
`"jaws dropped." Id. This was a transition to a "move in" sales model, which incentivizes
`
`sales to Elanco's direct customers—the distributors.4
`
`In the months leading up to Elanco's initial public offering in September of 2018,
`
`Confidential Witness 2 recounted that Elanco's top management became so consumed
`
`with hitting sales numbers to meet market expectations that the pressure to "stuff the
`
`channel" correspondingly ramped up. Id. ¶ 50. In February of 2018, Confidential Witness
`
`1, recalled being asked by Shriver "to bring in a million here, an extra $2 million there, to
`
`
`4 While we accept as true Plaintiffs' factual allegation that Elanco switched sales models, we
`have sidestepped Plaintiffs' editorialized description of the "move in" sales model.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 8 of 58 PageID #: 1054
`
`close the gap on another business segment that wasn't doing well." Id. ¶ 51. Confidential
`
`Witness 2 was directed by Shriver to "figure out which products [MWI could] take and
`
`stuff it in," and "it doesn't matter how you get it in." Id. ¶ 52. Ultimately, Shriver directed
`
`Confidential Witness 2 to "stuff the MWI channel with an additional $3 million of
`
`Interceptor Plus and Trifexus, two popular Companion Animal medications . . . even
`
`though MWI was already holding 75-80 days of both products." Id. The industry standard
`
`practice, we were told, is to hold between 45 and 60 days' worth of inventory.
`
`Confidential Witness 2 increased MWI's margin on Trifexus from eighteen to twenty
`
`percent.
`
`Regarding these months leading up to the September initial public offering,
`
`Confidential Witness 4 recalled that "[w]hen 'move out' started to come short of
`
`projections, that's when [Elanco] start [sic] to 'move in' more." Id. ¶ 50. Specifically,
`
`Confidential Witness 4 recalled that "by mid-2018" the shift to selling as much of
`
`Elanco's products to distributors as possible, regardless of end-user demand, had "started
`
`again." Id. ¶ 53. Confidential Witness 4 was identified as the Global Head of Animal
`
`Care Expansion, Business Development & Licensing and Alternate Innovation from
`
`September of 2018 to January of 2020, and then a Vice President from January of 2020
`
`until July of 2020. It is thus unclear how Confidential Witness 4 came to possess this
`
`information reflecting business activity occurring months before his or her being
`
`employed at Elanco.
`
`C. ELANCO'S INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 9 of 58 PageID #: 1055
`
`In Elanco's registration statement for its initial public offering, Elanco stated its
`
`intention to "continue to grow our business and create value for our shareholders through
`
`a targeted value-generating strategy with three key pillars: a Portfolio Strategy for our
`
`marketed products, an Innovation Strategy for our R&D pipeline and a Productivity
`
`Strategy for our margin expansion initiatives." Id. ¶ 95. Elanco's Portfolio Strategy
`
`promised to focus "the majority of our resources, including more than 75% of our R&D
`
`funding, on our three targeted growth categories": Companion Animal Disease
`
`Prevention, Companion Animal Therapeutics and Food Animal Future Protein & Health,
`
`"where we believe we are well positioned to grow faster than the market." Id. For its
`
`Companion Animal Disease Prevention category, Elanco believed it was well positioned
`
`to drive additional growth through "continued product innovation and sales channel
`
`expansion." Id. For its well-established Food Animal Ruminants & Swine category,
`
`Elanco expected to "continue to be a leader," believing it had "created long-standing
`
`customer relationships [that] provide[s] an important revenue source for our business and
`
`for investment capital to support future growth." Docket No. 38-1, at 7.
`
`Elanco's Innovation strategy included "strong" in-house Research & Development
`
`capabilities in addition to acquiring products through acquisitions or venture capital
`
`investment. Id. at 8. "This inclusive approach to innovation allows us to identify, attract,
`
`fund, and develop new ideas in a manner that enhances our pipeline while, we believe,
`
`reducing the risk associated with an in-house only innovation model." Id. Pursuant to this
`
`strategy, Elanco had launched nine products from 2015 to 2017 that delivered revenue of
`
`$24.7 million in 2015, $97.9 million in 2016, and $143.8 million in 2017, and $136.6
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 10 of 58 PageID #: 1056
`
`million during the first half of 2018. Elanco believed its new products would continue to
`
`be an "important source of revenue." Id. However, Elanco cautioned that generic
`
`competitors were "becoming more aggressive in terms of lauching products before patent
`
`rights expire, and, because of attractive pricing, sales of generic products are an
`
`increasing percentage of overall animal health sales in certain regions." Id. at 12. Elanco
`
`also disclosed that approximately seventy-five percent of its revenue in 2017 came from
`
`products that did not have patent protection, including revenue from some of its top
`
`products like Rumensin. Id. at 16. As a result, Elanco already had faced competition from
`
`lower-priced generics or other alternatives to some of its products and warned that it
`
`could continue to face such competition for more of its products.
`
`Elanco's Productivity Strategy focused, in part, on sales growth, which entailed plans
`
`by Elanco to significantly increase its operating margins by increasing productivity
`
`within its sales force. To accomplish this level of growth, Elanco would rely on both its
`
`"sales force's strong customer relationships" and Elanco's "strategic distributor
`
`partnerships to efficiently grow demand for [its] products." Compl. ¶ 46. Elanco's
`
`registration statement identified "increased use of alternative distribution channels,"
`
`"changes within existing distribution channels," and changes within its existing
`
`distributor relationships as risk factors for its Companion Animal products. Id. ¶ 97.
`
`Elanco's registration statement included the disclosure that in 2017, a change in their
`
`"inventory management practices resulted in a revenue lag as existing inventory was sold
`
`down, which management estimates decreased our revenue by approximately $35
`
`million." Id.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 11 of 58 PageID #: 1057
`
`D. ELANCO'S 2018 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
`
`
`i. THIRD QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`Confidential Witness 4 recalled that the "move in" model was in full force by late
`
`2018, with Elanco offering discounts, additional rebates, and extended payment terms to
`
`induce distributors to purchase more inventory. Id. ¶ 54. On November 6, 2018, Elanco
`
`announced its third quarter 2018 financial results and reported that revenue had grown
`
`nine percent—as compared to the third quarter of 2017—to $761.1 million. Revenue
`
`from the Companion Animal Disease Prevention and Therapeutics categories grew thirty-
`
`four and twenty-seven percent, respectively, growth that was driven by increased volume
`
`and price. Food Animal Ruminants & Swine increased eight percent for the quarter,
`
`while Food Animal Future Protein & Health grew two percent for the quarter.
`
`On an earnings call conducted that same day, Elanco's President and Chief Executive
`
`Officer Jeffery Simmons explained that Elanco "saw strong performance in our targeted
`
`growth categories, and we continue delivering on our commitments to achieve a
`
`sustainable flow of innovation with new product approvals, several new launches, and an
`
`R&D collaboration." Id. ¶ 104. He further explained that Elanco's "margin expansion
`
`efforts continue to progress," and ultimately, "we met our expectations for delivery in our
`
`first quarter as a publicly traded company." Id. Simmons commented that while some of
`
`the growth rates in this quarter were "quite large due to purchasing patterns, the year-to-
`
`date results are more in line with our goals and strategy." Id. For example, Elanco's then-
`
`Chief Financial Officer explained that part of the Companion Animal Disease
`
`Prevention's high growth rate was due to "a favorable comparison to the prior year,
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 12 of 58 PageID #: 1058
`
`including an anticipated stock out in [quarter three] in 2017, which shifted sales to the
`
`second quarter." Id. ¶ 105. Simmons concluded that these results demonstrated that "our
`
`strategy is performing as expected and we are tracking towards our goals." Id. ¶ 104.
`
`i. FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR END PERFORMANCE
`
`During the fourth quarter of 2018, Shriver directed Confidential Witness 1 to push
`
`$10 to $12 million worth of excess feed additive and vaccine inventory onto MWI, over
`
`and above MWI's typical monthly purchase of $12 million in feed additive. Id. ¶ 60.
`
`Confidential Witness 1 recalled that by the fourth quarter of 2018, inventory levels of
`
`feed additives and cattle vaccines were at 120 days at Elanco's major distributors, double
`
`the industry standard. On February 6, 2019, Elanco announced its financial results for
`
`both the fourth quarter and the full year of 2018, reporting revenue growth of six percent,
`
`to $799.3 million and $3.1 billion, respectively. Net income and earnings per share (EPS)
`
`had reached $86.5 million and $0.28, respectively. Docket No. 38-3, at 9. For the year,
`
`the deduction for estimated rebates and discounts totaled $221 million. Docket No. 38-11,
`
`at 6. These results, according to Elanco, reflected "strong volume growth and the
`
`execution of the company's targeted, three-pillar strategy focused on Portfolio,
`
`Innovation and Productivity" as well as a "strong full year performance in its three
`
`targeted growth categories." Compl. ¶ 119. Food Animal Ruminants & Swine still
`
`accounted for thirty-eight percent of Elanco's revenue for the year, with Food Animal
`
`Future Protein & Health accounting for twenty-three percent, Companion Animal
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 13 of 58 PageID #: 1059
`
`Disease Prevention accounting for twenty-six percent, and Companion Animal
`
`Therapeutics accounting for just nine percent. Id. ¶ 43.
`
`For the fourth quarter of 2018, the constant currency core revenue growth rate reached
`
`six percent. Companion Animal Disease Prevention revenue was up forty-three percent
`
`for the quarter, which "improved in comparison to [the] prior year due to a reduction in
`
`channel inventory in the fourth quarter of 2017." Id. ¶ 119. However, Elanco reported
`
`that revenue for Companion Animal Therapeutics had decreased by six percent due to the
`
`timing and availability of Galliprant shipments. Elanco attributed this decrease to "a
`
`planned shipment in late 2018 [which] was delayed until early 2019 to appropriately
`
`complete the quality release process," and demand for Galliprant has exceeded supply
`
`capacity "resulting in Galliprant backorders at the end of the year." Id. Elanco was
`
`"working diligently to expand production and expects to clear remaining backorders by
`
`late first quarter or early second quarter 2019." Id. Food Animal Future Protein & Health
`
`revenue had increased eight percent, driven by volume and increased price. Revenue for
`
`Food Animal Ruminants & Swine, Elanco's largest revenue category, had decreased by
`
`eight percent, driven by "softness in swine antibiotics, particularly in Asia, and a stock-
`
`outage of Micotil, an injective treatment for Bovine Respiratory Disease, now resolved."
`
`Docket No. 38-3, at 8.
`
`E. ELANCO'S 2019 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
`
`On December 18, 2018, Elanco announced its financial guidance for 2019, with
`
`included stated expectations of annual revenue of between $3.10 and $3.16 billion and
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 14 of 58 PageID #: 1060
`
`earnings per share of between $0.36 to $0.48 on a reported basis and $1.02 to $1.12 on an
`
`adjusted basis. During a call with investors held that day, Simmons said the company was
`
`pleased with the progress made in 2018, and was "meeting our expectations, achieving
`
`sales growth, delivering innovation, executing our margin expansion priorities and
`
`carrying momentum into 2019." Compl. ¶ 115. "On a like-for-like comparison across
`
`years," Simmons stated that the company expected to "grow 2019 earnings at a double-
`
`digit pace." Id. He further explained that "the fundamentals of our industry are strong,
`
`and our strategy sets us up to grow revenue, expand margins and bring new innovation."
`
`Id. Elanco's Chief Financial Officer Todd Young explained on that call that "underlying
`
`operational growth and the benefits of the restructuring actions provide an expected 15%
`
`increase in adjusted EPS for 2019, well above the expected constant currency core
`
`revenue growth rate of 4% to 6%." Id. ¶ 116.
`
`During an unspecified quarter in 2019, Confidential Witness 3 reportedly "sold $10
`
`million of product to Animal Health International, a Patterson subsidiary, in exchange for
`
`a 5% rebate, while Nutra Blend received a 20% rebate to incentivize Nutra Blend to make
`
`a larger purchase in excess of its needed inventory." Id. ¶ 57. However, Confidential
`
`Witness 3 was a National Accounts Manager in Elanco's Food Animal Division and was
`
`responsible for Elanco's relationships with MWI, Covetrus, and Patterson. There is no
`
`mention of Confidential Witness 3 working with Nutra Blend, so it is unclear whether
`
`this information provided here by him or her was first-or second-hand. Confidential
`
`Witness 3 reported to Shriver.
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 15 of 58 PageID #: 1061
`
`i. FIRST QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`On April 26, 2019, Elanco announced its agreement to acquire Aratana, the pet
`
`therapeutics company from whom Elanco had previously licensed Galliprant. On May 9,
`
`2019, Elanco announced its first quarter financial results, reporting that revenue declined
`
`one percent to $731.1 million. Elanco reduced its revenue expectations for the year to a
`
`range of $3.08 and $3.14 billion. Companion Animal Disease Prevention revenue was
`
`down eight percent for the quarter, while Companion Animal Therapeutics revenue was
`
`up thirty-one percent, "primarily driven by sales of Galliprant" as "backorders in the
`
`channel were resolved and the product was launched in several European markets." Id. ¶
`
`116. Food Animal Future Protein & Health revenue was flat for the quarter, while Food
`
`Animal Ruminants & Swine decreased three percent as growth from the resolution of
`
`certain backorders and favorable purchasing patterns in cattle products was offset by
`
`other external factors such as the African Swine Fever.
`
`On an earnings call conducted that day, CFO Todd Young explained that there is a lot
`
`of variability in the stocking dynamics of distributors, especially between the Companion
`
`Animal Therapeutics and Companion Animal Disease Prevention categories. Young
`
`further explained that there were incentives for distributors to buy more vaccines and
`
`parasiticides to meet the tiering incentives in the fourth quarter of 2018, so "they were
`
`pretty fully stocked on those" versus in the first quarter of 2019, when "the incentive was
`
`to buy Galliprant given [Elanco had] resolved all the backorders and had lots of
`
`production on that side." Id. ¶ 135. Young emphasized that he felt "very good about the
`
`underlying demand at the vet channel," and, while the sixteen percent six-month growth
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 16 of 58 PageID #: 1062
`
`rate was "certainly not what we project for the full year, we do feel very good about our
`
`position with our companion animal portfolio for the rest of 2019." Id.
`
`ii. SECOND QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`During the second quarter of 2019, Shriver instructed Confidential Witness 3 to sell
`
`an additional $5 million of products to Confidential Witness 3's distributors. After filing
`
`the necessary merger registration documents with the SEC, Elanco's merger with Aratana
`
`was declared effective on June 17, 2019. At the end of the second quarter, when MWI
`
`was already holding more than 60 days of inventory for feed additives, Shriver directed
`
`Confidential Witness 1 to sell an "additional $10 million that quarter on top of MWI's
`
`normally scheduled $9-$10 million purchase." Id. ¶ 61. "In order to convince MWI to
`
`make such a large additional purchase," Confidential Witness 1 "offered an additional
`
`rebate of 3%, which grew to an additional 5% on top of the standard discount as the year
`
`progressed." Id. Confidential Witness 1 also recalled that by around mid-2019, MWI had
`
`taken on so much extra inventory that MWI had to rent warehouse space and use tractor-
`
`trailers in Amarillo, Texas to store the surplus product MWI purchased from Elanco.
`
`On August 13, 2019, Elanco announced its second quarter 2019 financial results,
`
`reporting a revenue increase of one percent to $781.6 million, with four percent constant
`
`currency rate revenue growth. Simmons stated the company was "encouraged by the 9
`
`percent constant currency growth in our targeted growth categories." Id. ¶ 156. However,
`
`Elanco again reduced its 2019 financial guidance, lowering the top end of the revenue
`
`range by $20 million, "primarily [from] the increased headwind from [the] African Swine
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 17 of 58 PageID #: 1063
`
`Fever and anticipated supply disruption of certain injectable cattle products." Docket No.
`
`38-5, at 8. Revenue for the Companion Animal Disease Prevention category grew six
`
`percent from both volume and price. Revenue for Companion Animal Therapeutics
`
`increased twenty-six percent, with twenty-one percent of the growth attributable to
`
`increased sales volume. Young explained on the earnings call that day that this "growth is
`
`driven by demand for products across the therapeutics portfolio, primarily the continued
`
`uptake for Galliprant in the U.S. and now a strong launch in Europe as well." Compl. ¶
`
`158. Future Protein and Health's revenue grew seven percent, but Food Animal
`
`Ruminants & Swine's revenue was down nine percent, with unfavorable purchasing
`
`patterns for Rumensin in the United States, and the continued impact from external
`
`factors such as the African Swine Fever on Elanco's international business, particularly in
`
`Asia. Docket No. 38-5, at 7. Moreover, during that same earnings call, Young discussed
`
`the recent approval of a generic version of Rumensin as well as the pending launch of a
`
`competitor to two of Elanco's best-performing Companion Animal Disease Prevention
`
`products.
`
`iii. THIRD QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`Confidential Witness 3 recalled a telephone conversation occurring in September of
`
`2019 with Shriver, in which Shriver told him or her that during a meeting Shriver had
`
`with Simmons at Elanco's headquarters, Simmons told him to "make the quarter, no
`
`matter what." Compl. ¶ 63. In or around that same time, Confidential Witness 3 also
`
`recalled Shriver telling them that Simmons was particularly worried about the
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 18 of 58 PageID #: 1064
`
`introduction of a generic form of Rumensin and was thus eager to push out Elanco's
`
`Rumensin inventory. Shriver directed Confidential Witness 3 to sell an additional $5
`
`million for the third quarter among MWI, Covetrus, and Patterson, even though each
`
`customer was already "bursting" with inventory. Id. In September of 2019, Shriver also
`
`directed Confidential Witness 3 to push an extra $10 million in cattle feed additives—
`
`including Rumensin—to meet Elanco's third quarter 2019 revenue forecast. Confidential
`
`Witness 3 recalled that a fellow Account Manager, using the 10% rebate incentive Elanco
`
`offered to distributors purchasing in the last week of a quarter, managed to sell an extra
`
`$20 million of inventory to Nutra Blend.
`
`On November 6, 2019, Elanco announced its third quarter 2019 financial results,
`
`reporting a revenue increase of one percent to $771.3 million, and core revenue at
`
`constant currency rates

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket