`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH
`INCORPORATED,
`JEFFREY N. SIMMONS,
`TODD S. YOUNG,
`JAMES M. MEER,
`R. DAVID HOOVER,
`KAPILA K. ANAND,
`JOHN P. BILBREY,
`ART A. GARCIA,
`MICHAEL J. HARRINGTON,
`DEBORAH T. KOCHEVAR,
`LAWRENCE E. KURZIUS,
`KIRK MCDONALD,
`DENISE SCOTS-KNIGHT,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 1 of 58 PageID #: 1047
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
`INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
`
`
`SANDRA HUNTER Individually and on behalf of
`all others similarly situated,
`MARLA STRAPPE,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`ORDER GRANTNG DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Investors in Elanco Animal Health, Inc.—a publicly traded company based in
`
`Greenfield, Indiana—have filed this purported class action for federal securities
`
`violations on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Elanco stock
`
`between September 20, 2018, and May 6, 2020. Plaintiffs allege that Elanco and its
`
`officers engaged in a scheme to deceive and defraud investors of the true value of
`
`Elanco's common stock in violation of federal securities law. Specifically, Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 2 of 58 PageID #: 1048
`
`allege that Defendants artificially boosted Elanco's earnings and growth by "stuffing"
`
`product distribution channels "far in excess of end-user demand." This, Plaintiffs argue,
`
`combined with Defendants' false and misleading representations about Elanco's growth
`
`and financial situation, led to the artificial inflation of Elanco's stock prices during the
`
`class period. Due to Defendants' allegedly unlawful actions, Plaintiffs claim that they
`
`were injured by purchasing or acquiring Elanco stock during the class period. We
`
`consider here Defendants' Motion to Dismiss this cause of action for failure to state a
`
`claim, and failure to meet the heightened pleading standards required by these specific
`
`securities violations.
`
`I.
`
`ALLEGATIONS OF FACT
`
`Faced with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss a federal securities action, "courts must,
`
`as with any motion to dismiss for failure to plead a claim on which relief can be granted,
`
`accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true," Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues &
`
`Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308, 322 (2007) ("Tellabs II"), and draw all inferences in Plaintiffs'
`
`favor, Bielanski v. County of Kane, 550 F.3d 632, 633 (7th Cir. 2008). However, "we are
`
`not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation." Papasan
`
`v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986). We are also not required to "cast a blind eye to 'facts
`
`alleged in the complaint that undermine the plaintiff's claim.'" Gaines v. Guidant Corp.,
`
`2004 WL 2538374 (S.D. Ind. 2004) (Barker, J.) (quoting Arazie v. Mullane, 2 F.3d 1456,
`
`1465 (7th Cir. 1993)). Except where explicitly noted, the facts described herein are those
`
`alleged by Plaintiffs in their First Amended Complaint.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 3 of 58 PageID #: 1049
`
`A. BACKGROUND AND PARTIES
`
`Plaintiffs include both those persons and entities who purchased Elanco securities
`
`between September 20, 2018, and May 6, 2020, as well as those who acquired Elanco
`
`common stock pursuant to Elanco's merger with Aratana Therapeutics on July 18, 2019.
`
`Lead Plaintiff, Sandra Hunter, filed this class action complaint alleging that Elanco, its
`
`Chief Executive Officer Jeffery N. Simmons, and its Chief Financial Officer Todd S.
`
`Young, made fraudulent misrepresentations by omitting material information relating to
`
`"systemic and undisclosed channel stuffing practices" that caused distributors to purchase
`
`inventory "far in excess of demand" from dozens of public statements.1 Compl. ¶¶ 77, 94-
`
`96, 100-01, 103-11, 113-24, 128-29, 131-43, 145-54, 156-69, 171-81, 184-89, 191-203,
`
`206-13. Plaintiffs argue the omission of this information made Elanco's growth and
`
`revenue figures throughout the class period materially misleading. Plaintiffs also allege
`
`that Elanco's Chief Account Officer James M. Meer and the nine members of Elanco's
`
`Board of Directors, by omitting this information regarding channel stuffing from the
`
`offering materials for Elanco's merger with Arantana Therapeutics, rendered the growth
`
`and revenue calculations within these documents materially misleading as well.2
`
`
`1 Because we decline to reproduce here the twenty-seven challenged statements in their
`entirety—which span sixty pages and consist of single-spaced, block quotations with large
`swathes of unchallenged portions of text—we have summarized and extracted relevant portions
`of the facts section of the briefs. We will address the challenged statements more thoroughly in
`the analysis section.
`2 The individual Defendants from the Elanco's Board of Directors are the Chairman R. David
`Hoover, Kapila K. Anand, John P. Bilbrey, Art A. Garcia, Michael J. Harrington, Deborah T.
`Kochevar, Lawrence E. Kurzius, Kirk McDonald, and Denise Scots-Knight. Compl. ¶¶ 23–33.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 4 of 58 PageID #: 1050
`
`Formerly a business unit of Eli Lilly and Company, Elanco was spun-off into a
`
`standalone, public company after its initial public offering on September 20, 2018.
`
`Elanco develops, manufactures, and markets animal health products for both companion
`
`animals, such as dogs and cats, and food animals, i.e., cattle and poultry. Prior to its
`
`initial public offering, Elanco was the fourth largest animal health company in the world,
`
`with $2.9 billion in revenue in 2017. Docket. No. 38-1, at 7.3 Elanco had reported net
`
`income losses for the three years preceding its initial public offering, with $310.7 million,
`
`$47.9 million, and $210.8 million net income loss in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
`
`Elanco expected to "continue to incur substantial expenditures to develop, manufacture,
`
`and market our products and implement [their] business strategies." Id. at 12.
`
`Elanco generates revenue primarily through product sales to customers, who are
`
`generally not end-users, but rather third-party wholesale distributors of Elanco's products.
`
`These distributors, in turn, sell to customers like veterinary clinics for companion animal
`
`products, or cattle and dairy farms for food animal products. Consistent with generally
`
`accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Elanco generally recognizes revenue at the time
`
`the product is shipped their customers. Id. at 46. Payment terms "differ by jurisdiction
`
`and customer, but payment terms in most of [Elanco's] major jurisdictions typically range
`
`from 30 to 100 days from date of shipment." Id. at 47. Going into the IPO, Elanco had
`
`
`3 Docket No. 38-1 references Elanco's Form S-1 Registration Statement attached to the
`Declaration of Stacy Nettleton in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. In ruling on a
`motion to dismiss, courts may consider judicially noticed documents, including publicly filed
`SEC filings, without converting the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment. See
`In re Guidant Corp. Sec. Litig., 536 F. Supp. 2d 913, 921 (S.D. Ind. 2008) (Barker, J.), aff'd sub
`nom. Fannon v. Guidant Corp., 583 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2009).
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 5 of 58 PageID #: 1051
`
`eight primary customers: MWI Animal Health, Covetrus, Inc., Patterson Veterinary,
`
`Midwest Veterinary Supply, K+K Vet Supply Inc., Penn Veterinary Supply, Inc., Victor
`
`Medical Company, Veterinary Service, Inc., and Nutra Blend LLC.
`
`Elanco's contracts with "direct and indirect customers may provide for various rebates
`
`and discounts that may differ in each contract." Id. To determine the appropriate
`
`transaction price for Elanco's product sales at the time it recognizes a sale to a direct
`
`customer, Elanco "must estimate any rebates or discounts that ultimately will be due to
`
`the direct customer and other customers in the distribution chain under the terms of
`
`[their] contracts." Id. "The rebate and discount amounts are recorded as a deduction to
`
`arrive at [their] net product sales." Elanco estimates these accruals using an expected
`
`value approach. Actual product returns were less than two percent of Elanco's net revenue
`
`between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018. Id. at 48. During the first six months of
`
`2018, Elanco's sales rebates and discounts liability in the United States reached $88.6
`
`million, compared to $108.2 million in liability for the first six months of the prior year,
`
`2017. Id.
`
`In the animal health sector, companion animal products generally have higher gross
`
`margins relative to food animal products. Elanco began as a food animal-focused
`
`company, but in the ten years preceding its initial public offering, it had "intentionally
`
`transformed" into a diversified global company. Id. at 7. In addition to Elanco's
`
`established position in Food Animal Ruminants & Swine, the company had sought to
`
`increase its profitability and grow its revenue by establishing positions in three "targeted
`
`growth categories": Companion Animal Disease Prevention, Companion Animal
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 6 of 58 PageID #: 1052
`
`Therapeutics, and Food Animal Future Protein and Health. Id. To establish market
`
`positions in these higher margin categories, Elanco had made "strategic acquisitions" to
`
`expand its product portfolio, increase its sales presence, and obtain Research &
`
`Development and manufacturing capabilities. Id. For example, Elanco licensed
`
`Galliprant—a canine osteoarthritis drug from Aratana Therapeutics in 2016—which
`
`generated ten percent sales growth in their Companion Animal sector in 2017. "As a
`
`result of these acquisitions as well as organic growth," Elanco grew their Companion
`
`Animal categories "from a minimal presence in 2007 to more than $900 million in
`
`revenue in 2017." Id. However, an estimated one-third of Elanco's revenue still came
`
`from its medicated feed additives within its Food Animal Ruminants & Swine category.
`
`Moreover, Elanco's top product, Rumensin, a feed additive for cattle, generated
`
`approximately ten percent of Elanco's total revenue that year. Id.
`
`B. LEAD UP TO ELANCO'S INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
`
`During 2017, according to Confidential Witness 1, Elanco employed a "move out"
`
`style business model which focuses on "creating incentives and opportunities to increase
`
`sales by distributors to the ultimate end-users." Compl. ¶ 48. Confidential Witness 1 was
`
`described as a Corporate Account Manager in Elanco's Large Animal division and was
`
`responsible for managing Elanco's relationship with four distributors—MWI, Midwest,
`
`K+K, and Veterinary Service, Inc. Confidential Witness 1 reported to Director of Food
`
`Animal Channel & Distribution, Courtney Shriver, who reported to Senior Director of
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 7 of 58 PageID #: 1053
`
`Channel Strategy and Sales Force Excellence for North America, Julia Loew, who
`
`reported to Vice President, Companion Animal US, Shawn McKee.
`
`Towards the end of 2017, according to Confidential Witness 2, Elanco introduced a
`
`"sliding scale of margins, adjusted quarterly, based on the amount of product distributors
`
`purchased." Id. ¶ 49. Confidential Witness 2 was a Corporate Account Manager in
`
`Elanco's Companion Animal division and was responsible for contract negotiations and
`
`overseeing the day-to-day management of Elanco's relationship with MWI. Confidential
`
`Witness 2 also reported to Shriver, the Director of Food Animal Channel & Distribution.
`
`Confidential Witness 2 stated, "MWI was held to a certain amount of buy from us, and if
`
`they didn't make it, then their margin dropped." Id. According to Confidential Witness 2,
`
`"[n]obody does this," instead "[y]ou should be able to give your client at least annually
`
`[sic] visibility" on their margins. Id. When making a presentation on the sliding scale of
`
`margins at a conference in 2018, Confidential Witness 2 recalled that MWI executives'
`
`"jaws dropped." Id. This was a transition to a "move in" sales model, which incentivizes
`
`sales to Elanco's direct customers—the distributors.4
`
`In the months leading up to Elanco's initial public offering in September of 2018,
`
`Confidential Witness 2 recounted that Elanco's top management became so consumed
`
`with hitting sales numbers to meet market expectations that the pressure to "stuff the
`
`channel" correspondingly ramped up. Id. ¶ 50. In February of 2018, Confidential Witness
`
`1, recalled being asked by Shriver "to bring in a million here, an extra $2 million there, to
`
`
`4 While we accept as true Plaintiffs' factual allegation that Elanco switched sales models, we
`have sidestepped Plaintiffs' editorialized description of the "move in" sales model.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 8 of 58 PageID #: 1054
`
`close the gap on another business segment that wasn't doing well." Id. ¶ 51. Confidential
`
`Witness 2 was directed by Shriver to "figure out which products [MWI could] take and
`
`stuff it in," and "it doesn't matter how you get it in." Id. ¶ 52. Ultimately, Shriver directed
`
`Confidential Witness 2 to "stuff the MWI channel with an additional $3 million of
`
`Interceptor Plus and Trifexus, two popular Companion Animal medications . . . even
`
`though MWI was already holding 75-80 days of both products." Id. The industry standard
`
`practice, we were told, is to hold between 45 and 60 days' worth of inventory.
`
`Confidential Witness 2 increased MWI's margin on Trifexus from eighteen to twenty
`
`percent.
`
`Regarding these months leading up to the September initial public offering,
`
`Confidential Witness 4 recalled that "[w]hen 'move out' started to come short of
`
`projections, that's when [Elanco] start [sic] to 'move in' more." Id. ¶ 50. Specifically,
`
`Confidential Witness 4 recalled that "by mid-2018" the shift to selling as much of
`
`Elanco's products to distributors as possible, regardless of end-user demand, had "started
`
`again." Id. ¶ 53. Confidential Witness 4 was identified as the Global Head of Animal
`
`Care Expansion, Business Development & Licensing and Alternate Innovation from
`
`September of 2018 to January of 2020, and then a Vice President from January of 2020
`
`until July of 2020. It is thus unclear how Confidential Witness 4 came to possess this
`
`information reflecting business activity occurring months before his or her being
`
`employed at Elanco.
`
`C. ELANCO'S INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 9 of 58 PageID #: 1055
`
`In Elanco's registration statement for its initial public offering, Elanco stated its
`
`intention to "continue to grow our business and create value for our shareholders through
`
`a targeted value-generating strategy with three key pillars: a Portfolio Strategy for our
`
`marketed products, an Innovation Strategy for our R&D pipeline and a Productivity
`
`Strategy for our margin expansion initiatives." Id. ¶ 95. Elanco's Portfolio Strategy
`
`promised to focus "the majority of our resources, including more than 75% of our R&D
`
`funding, on our three targeted growth categories": Companion Animal Disease
`
`Prevention, Companion Animal Therapeutics and Food Animal Future Protein & Health,
`
`"where we believe we are well positioned to grow faster than the market." Id. For its
`
`Companion Animal Disease Prevention category, Elanco believed it was well positioned
`
`to drive additional growth through "continued product innovation and sales channel
`
`expansion." Id. For its well-established Food Animal Ruminants & Swine category,
`
`Elanco expected to "continue to be a leader," believing it had "created long-standing
`
`customer relationships [that] provide[s] an important revenue source for our business and
`
`for investment capital to support future growth." Docket No. 38-1, at 7.
`
`Elanco's Innovation strategy included "strong" in-house Research & Development
`
`capabilities in addition to acquiring products through acquisitions or venture capital
`
`investment. Id. at 8. "This inclusive approach to innovation allows us to identify, attract,
`
`fund, and develop new ideas in a manner that enhances our pipeline while, we believe,
`
`reducing the risk associated with an in-house only innovation model." Id. Pursuant to this
`
`strategy, Elanco had launched nine products from 2015 to 2017 that delivered revenue of
`
`$24.7 million in 2015, $97.9 million in 2016, and $143.8 million in 2017, and $136.6
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 10 of 58 PageID #: 1056
`
`million during the first half of 2018. Elanco believed its new products would continue to
`
`be an "important source of revenue." Id. However, Elanco cautioned that generic
`
`competitors were "becoming more aggressive in terms of lauching products before patent
`
`rights expire, and, because of attractive pricing, sales of generic products are an
`
`increasing percentage of overall animal health sales in certain regions." Id. at 12. Elanco
`
`also disclosed that approximately seventy-five percent of its revenue in 2017 came from
`
`products that did not have patent protection, including revenue from some of its top
`
`products like Rumensin. Id. at 16. As a result, Elanco already had faced competition from
`
`lower-priced generics or other alternatives to some of its products and warned that it
`
`could continue to face such competition for more of its products.
`
`Elanco's Productivity Strategy focused, in part, on sales growth, which entailed plans
`
`by Elanco to significantly increase its operating margins by increasing productivity
`
`within its sales force. To accomplish this level of growth, Elanco would rely on both its
`
`"sales force's strong customer relationships" and Elanco's "strategic distributor
`
`partnerships to efficiently grow demand for [its] products." Compl. ¶ 46. Elanco's
`
`registration statement identified "increased use of alternative distribution channels,"
`
`"changes within existing distribution channels," and changes within its existing
`
`distributor relationships as risk factors for its Companion Animal products. Id. ¶ 97.
`
`Elanco's registration statement included the disclosure that in 2017, a change in their
`
`"inventory management practices resulted in a revenue lag as existing inventory was sold
`
`down, which management estimates decreased our revenue by approximately $35
`
`million." Id.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 11 of 58 PageID #: 1057
`
`D. ELANCO'S 2018 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
`
`
`i. THIRD QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`Confidential Witness 4 recalled that the "move in" model was in full force by late
`
`2018, with Elanco offering discounts, additional rebates, and extended payment terms to
`
`induce distributors to purchase more inventory. Id. ¶ 54. On November 6, 2018, Elanco
`
`announced its third quarter 2018 financial results and reported that revenue had grown
`
`nine percent—as compared to the third quarter of 2017—to $761.1 million. Revenue
`
`from the Companion Animal Disease Prevention and Therapeutics categories grew thirty-
`
`four and twenty-seven percent, respectively, growth that was driven by increased volume
`
`and price. Food Animal Ruminants & Swine increased eight percent for the quarter,
`
`while Food Animal Future Protein & Health grew two percent for the quarter.
`
`On an earnings call conducted that same day, Elanco's President and Chief Executive
`
`Officer Jeffery Simmons explained that Elanco "saw strong performance in our targeted
`
`growth categories, and we continue delivering on our commitments to achieve a
`
`sustainable flow of innovation with new product approvals, several new launches, and an
`
`R&D collaboration." Id. ¶ 104. He further explained that Elanco's "margin expansion
`
`efforts continue to progress," and ultimately, "we met our expectations for delivery in our
`
`first quarter as a publicly traded company." Id. Simmons commented that while some of
`
`the growth rates in this quarter were "quite large due to purchasing patterns, the year-to-
`
`date results are more in line with our goals and strategy." Id. For example, Elanco's then-
`
`Chief Financial Officer explained that part of the Companion Animal Disease
`
`Prevention's high growth rate was due to "a favorable comparison to the prior year,
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 12 of 58 PageID #: 1058
`
`including an anticipated stock out in [quarter three] in 2017, which shifted sales to the
`
`second quarter." Id. ¶ 105. Simmons concluded that these results demonstrated that "our
`
`strategy is performing as expected and we are tracking towards our goals." Id. ¶ 104.
`
`i. FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR END PERFORMANCE
`
`During the fourth quarter of 2018, Shriver directed Confidential Witness 1 to push
`
`$10 to $12 million worth of excess feed additive and vaccine inventory onto MWI, over
`
`and above MWI's typical monthly purchase of $12 million in feed additive. Id. ¶ 60.
`
`Confidential Witness 1 recalled that by the fourth quarter of 2018, inventory levels of
`
`feed additives and cattle vaccines were at 120 days at Elanco's major distributors, double
`
`the industry standard. On February 6, 2019, Elanco announced its financial results for
`
`both the fourth quarter and the full year of 2018, reporting revenue growth of six percent,
`
`to $799.3 million and $3.1 billion, respectively. Net income and earnings per share (EPS)
`
`had reached $86.5 million and $0.28, respectively. Docket No. 38-3, at 9. For the year,
`
`the deduction for estimated rebates and discounts totaled $221 million. Docket No. 38-11,
`
`at 6. These results, according to Elanco, reflected "strong volume growth and the
`
`execution of the company's targeted, three-pillar strategy focused on Portfolio,
`
`Innovation and Productivity" as well as a "strong full year performance in its three
`
`targeted growth categories." Compl. ¶ 119. Food Animal Ruminants & Swine still
`
`accounted for thirty-eight percent of Elanco's revenue for the year, with Food Animal
`
`Future Protein & Health accounting for twenty-three percent, Companion Animal
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 13 of 58 PageID #: 1059
`
`Disease Prevention accounting for twenty-six percent, and Companion Animal
`
`Therapeutics accounting for just nine percent. Id. ¶ 43.
`
`For the fourth quarter of 2018, the constant currency core revenue growth rate reached
`
`six percent. Companion Animal Disease Prevention revenue was up forty-three percent
`
`for the quarter, which "improved in comparison to [the] prior year due to a reduction in
`
`channel inventory in the fourth quarter of 2017." Id. ¶ 119. However, Elanco reported
`
`that revenue for Companion Animal Therapeutics had decreased by six percent due to the
`
`timing and availability of Galliprant shipments. Elanco attributed this decrease to "a
`
`planned shipment in late 2018 [which] was delayed until early 2019 to appropriately
`
`complete the quality release process," and demand for Galliprant has exceeded supply
`
`capacity "resulting in Galliprant backorders at the end of the year." Id. Elanco was
`
`"working diligently to expand production and expects to clear remaining backorders by
`
`late first quarter or early second quarter 2019." Id. Food Animal Future Protein & Health
`
`revenue had increased eight percent, driven by volume and increased price. Revenue for
`
`Food Animal Ruminants & Swine, Elanco's largest revenue category, had decreased by
`
`eight percent, driven by "softness in swine antibiotics, particularly in Asia, and a stock-
`
`outage of Micotil, an injective treatment for Bovine Respiratory Disease, now resolved."
`
`Docket No. 38-3, at 8.
`
`E. ELANCO'S 2019 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
`
`On December 18, 2018, Elanco announced its financial guidance for 2019, with
`
`included stated expectations of annual revenue of between $3.10 and $3.16 billion and
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 14 of 58 PageID #: 1060
`
`earnings per share of between $0.36 to $0.48 on a reported basis and $1.02 to $1.12 on an
`
`adjusted basis. During a call with investors held that day, Simmons said the company was
`
`pleased with the progress made in 2018, and was "meeting our expectations, achieving
`
`sales growth, delivering innovation, executing our margin expansion priorities and
`
`carrying momentum into 2019." Compl. ¶ 115. "On a like-for-like comparison across
`
`years," Simmons stated that the company expected to "grow 2019 earnings at a double-
`
`digit pace." Id. He further explained that "the fundamentals of our industry are strong,
`
`and our strategy sets us up to grow revenue, expand margins and bring new innovation."
`
`Id. Elanco's Chief Financial Officer Todd Young explained on that call that "underlying
`
`operational growth and the benefits of the restructuring actions provide an expected 15%
`
`increase in adjusted EPS for 2019, well above the expected constant currency core
`
`revenue growth rate of 4% to 6%." Id. ¶ 116.
`
`During an unspecified quarter in 2019, Confidential Witness 3 reportedly "sold $10
`
`million of product to Animal Health International, a Patterson subsidiary, in exchange for
`
`a 5% rebate, while Nutra Blend received a 20% rebate to incentivize Nutra Blend to make
`
`a larger purchase in excess of its needed inventory." Id. ¶ 57. However, Confidential
`
`Witness 3 was a National Accounts Manager in Elanco's Food Animal Division and was
`
`responsible for Elanco's relationships with MWI, Covetrus, and Patterson. There is no
`
`mention of Confidential Witness 3 working with Nutra Blend, so it is unclear whether
`
`this information provided here by him or her was first-or second-hand. Confidential
`
`Witness 3 reported to Shriver.
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 15 of 58 PageID #: 1061
`
`i. FIRST QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`On April 26, 2019, Elanco announced its agreement to acquire Aratana, the pet
`
`therapeutics company from whom Elanco had previously licensed Galliprant. On May 9,
`
`2019, Elanco announced its first quarter financial results, reporting that revenue declined
`
`one percent to $731.1 million. Elanco reduced its revenue expectations for the year to a
`
`range of $3.08 and $3.14 billion. Companion Animal Disease Prevention revenue was
`
`down eight percent for the quarter, while Companion Animal Therapeutics revenue was
`
`up thirty-one percent, "primarily driven by sales of Galliprant" as "backorders in the
`
`channel were resolved and the product was launched in several European markets." Id. ¶
`
`116. Food Animal Future Protein & Health revenue was flat for the quarter, while Food
`
`Animal Ruminants & Swine decreased three percent as growth from the resolution of
`
`certain backorders and favorable purchasing patterns in cattle products was offset by
`
`other external factors such as the African Swine Fever.
`
`On an earnings call conducted that day, CFO Todd Young explained that there is a lot
`
`of variability in the stocking dynamics of distributors, especially between the Companion
`
`Animal Therapeutics and Companion Animal Disease Prevention categories. Young
`
`further explained that there were incentives for distributors to buy more vaccines and
`
`parasiticides to meet the tiering incentives in the fourth quarter of 2018, so "they were
`
`pretty fully stocked on those" versus in the first quarter of 2019, when "the incentive was
`
`to buy Galliprant given [Elanco had] resolved all the backorders and had lots of
`
`production on that side." Id. ¶ 135. Young emphasized that he felt "very good about the
`
`underlying demand at the vet channel," and, while the sixteen percent six-month growth
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 16 of 58 PageID #: 1062
`
`rate was "certainly not what we project for the full year, we do feel very good about our
`
`position with our companion animal portfolio for the rest of 2019." Id.
`
`ii. SECOND QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`During the second quarter of 2019, Shriver instructed Confidential Witness 3 to sell
`
`an additional $5 million of products to Confidential Witness 3's distributors. After filing
`
`the necessary merger registration documents with the SEC, Elanco's merger with Aratana
`
`was declared effective on June 17, 2019. At the end of the second quarter, when MWI
`
`was already holding more than 60 days of inventory for feed additives, Shriver directed
`
`Confidential Witness 1 to sell an "additional $10 million that quarter on top of MWI's
`
`normally scheduled $9-$10 million purchase." Id. ¶ 61. "In order to convince MWI to
`
`make such a large additional purchase," Confidential Witness 1 "offered an additional
`
`rebate of 3%, which grew to an additional 5% on top of the standard discount as the year
`
`progressed." Id. Confidential Witness 1 also recalled that by around mid-2019, MWI had
`
`taken on so much extra inventory that MWI had to rent warehouse space and use tractor-
`
`trailers in Amarillo, Texas to store the surplus product MWI purchased from Elanco.
`
`On August 13, 2019, Elanco announced its second quarter 2019 financial results,
`
`reporting a revenue increase of one percent to $781.6 million, with four percent constant
`
`currency rate revenue growth. Simmons stated the company was "encouraged by the 9
`
`percent constant currency growth in our targeted growth categories." Id. ¶ 156. However,
`
`Elanco again reduced its 2019 financial guidance, lowering the top end of the revenue
`
`range by $20 million, "primarily [from] the increased headwind from [the] African Swine
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 17 of 58 PageID #: 1063
`
`Fever and anticipated supply disruption of certain injectable cattle products." Docket No.
`
`38-5, at 8. Revenue for the Companion Animal Disease Prevention category grew six
`
`percent from both volume and price. Revenue for Companion Animal Therapeutics
`
`increased twenty-six percent, with twenty-one percent of the growth attributable to
`
`increased sales volume. Young explained on the earnings call that day that this "growth is
`
`driven by demand for products across the therapeutics portfolio, primarily the continued
`
`uptake for Galliprant in the U.S. and now a strong launch in Europe as well." Compl. ¶
`
`158. Future Protein and Health's revenue grew seven percent, but Food Animal
`
`Ruminants & Swine's revenue was down nine percent, with unfavorable purchasing
`
`patterns for Rumensin in the United States, and the continued impact from external
`
`factors such as the African Swine Fever on Elanco's international business, particularly in
`
`Asia. Docket No. 38-5, at 7. Moreover, during that same earnings call, Young discussed
`
`the recent approval of a generic version of Rumensin as well as the pending launch of a
`
`competitor to two of Elanco's best-performing Companion Animal Disease Prevention
`
`products.
`
`iii. THIRD QUARTER PERFORMANCE
`
`Confidential Witness 3 recalled a telephone conversation occurring in September of
`
`2019 with Shriver, in which Shriver told him or her that during a meeting Shriver had
`
`with Simmons at Elanco's headquarters, Simmons told him to "make the quarter, no
`
`matter what." Compl. ¶ 63. In or around that same time, Confidential Witness 3 also
`
`recalled Shriver telling them that Simmons was particularly worried about the
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01460-SEB-MG Document 62 Filed 08/17/22 Page 18 of 58 PageID #: 1064
`
`introduction of a generic form of Rumensin and was thus eager to push out Elanco's
`
`Rumensin inventory. Shriver directed Confidential Witness 3 to sell an additional $5
`
`million for the third quarter among MWI, Covetrus, and Patterson, even though each
`
`customer was already "bursting" with inventory. Id. In September of 2019, Shriver also
`
`directed Confidential Witness 3 to push an extra $10 million in cattle feed additives—
`
`including Rumensin—to meet Elanco's third quarter 2019 revenue forecast. Confidential
`
`Witness 3 recalled that a fellow Account Manager, using the 10% rebate incentive Elanco
`
`offered to distributors purchasing in the last week of a quarter, managed to sell an extra
`
`$20 million of inventory to Nutra Blend.
`
`On November 6, 2019, Elanco announced its third quarter 2019 financial results,
`
`reporting a revenue increase of one percent to $771.3 million, and core revenue at
`
`constant currency rates