throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN UV CURABLE COATINGS
`FOR OPTICAL FIBERS, COATED
`OPTICAL FIBERS, AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1031
`
`NOTICE OF COMMISSION DETERMINATION TO REVIEW IN PART A FINAL
`INITIAL DETERMINATION FINDING A VIOLATION OF SECTION 337;
`EXTENSION OF TARGET DATE
`
`AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
`
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (the
`"Commission") has determined to review in part the final initial determination (the "ID") issued
`by the presiding administrative law judge ("AU") on February 15, 2018, finding a violation of
`section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in connection with certain asserted patents.
`The Commission has also determined to extend the target date for the completion of this
`investigation from June 18, 2018, to June 25, 2018.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Traud, Office of the General Counsel,
`U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-
`205-3427. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
`or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
`Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington,
`DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also
`be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www. usitc.gov. The public record for this
`investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket ("EDIS") at
`https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can
`be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal, telephone 202-205-1810.
`
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 5, 2016, the Commission instituted this
`investigation based on a complaint filed by DSM Desotech, Inc. of Elgin, IL; and DSM IP Assets
`B.V. of Heerlen, Netherlands (collectively, "DSM" or "Complainants"). 81 FR 87588-89 (Dec.
`5, 2016). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
`19 U.S.C. 1337 ("section 337"), based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
`importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain UV curable coatings
`for optical fibers, coated optical fibers, and products containing same by reason of infringement
`of one or more of claims 1-8, 10-15, and 18-22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,961,508 ("the '508 patent");
`
`

`

`claims 1-10 and 13-15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,171,103 ("the '103 patent"); claims 2-4,9, 11-12,
`and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 7,067,564 ("the '564 patent"); and claims 1-3, 9, 12, 16-18, 21, and 30
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,706,659 ("the '659 patent"). Id. The Commission's Notice of Investigation
`named as respondents Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. of Shanghai, China
`("MUV"); and OFS Fitel, LLC of Norcross, Georgia ("OFS") (collectively, "Respondents"). Id.
`The Office of Unfair Import Investigations ("OUII") was also named as a party in this
`investigation. Id.
`
`Prior to the evidentiary hearing, DSM withdrew its allegations as to certain patent claims.
`See Order 12 (Apr. 12, 2017), unreviewed, Notice of Commission Determination Not to Review
`an Initial Determination Granting Complainants' Unopposed Motion to Terminate this
`Investigation with respect to One Patent Claim (May 11, 2017); Order 50 (Aug. 25, 2017),
`unreviewed, Notice of Commission Determination Not to Review An Initial Determination
`Withdrawing from the Complaint Certain Allegations Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,067,564
`(Sept. 15, 2017). DSM proceeded at the evidentiary hearing on the following patents and claims:
`claims 1-8, 11-15, 18-19, 20-21, and 22 of the '508 patent; claims 1-10 and 13-15 of the '103
`patent; and claims 1-3, 9, 12, 16-18, 21, and 30 of the '659 patent.
`
`On February 15, 2018, the All issued the ID, which finds only MUV in violation of
`section 337, and only as to the '508 and '103 patents. The AU J recommended that the
`Commission issue a limited exclusion order directed to MUV's infringing products. The AUJ
`also recommended a bond of forty percent of entered value during the Presidential review period.
`See 19 U.S.C. 1337(j)(3).
`
`On February 27-28, 2018, OUII, DSM, MUV, and OFS filed petitions for review of the
`ID, and on March 7-8, 2018, the parties filed responses to the petitions. On March 19, 2018, the
`private parties filed statements on the public interest. The Commission also received comments
`on the public interest from members of the public.
`
`Having examined the record in this investigation, including the ID, the petitions for
`review, and the responses thereto, the Commission has determined to review the ID in part. In
`particular, the Commission has determined to review the following:
`
`(1) Whether respondent OFS imports respondent MUV's accused
`KS1-043/048 coating.
`
`(2) Whether claim 30 of '659 patent is invalid for lack of written
`description.
`
`(3) Whether claims 1-8, 11, 15, and 18-19 of the '508 patent are
`invalid for lack of written description and enablement.
`
`(4) Whether claim 21 of the '508 patent and claims 1-10 and 13-15 of
`the '103 patent are invalid for lack of written description and enablement.
`
`(5) Whether the accused products infringe the '508, '103, and '659
`patents.
`
`2
`
`

`

`(6) Whether the technical and economic prongs of the domestic
`industry requirement have been met for the '508, '103, and '659 patents.
`
`The Commission has determined to not review the remainder of the ID. The Commission does
`not request any briefing at this time.
`
`This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure
`(19 CFR part 210).
`
`By order of the Commission.
`
`Issued: April 16, 2018
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTAIN UV CURABLE COATING FOR OPTICAL
`FIBERS, COATED OPTIONAL FIBERS, AND PRODUCTS
`CONTAINING SAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1031
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached NOTICE has been served by hand
`upon the Commission Investigative Staff, Claire K. Comfort, Esq., and the following parties, as
`indicated, on April 16, 2018.
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`On Behalf of Complainants DSM Desotech, Inc. and DSM IP
`Assets B.V.:
`
`Christine E. Lehman, Esq.
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai)
`Co. Ltd.:
`
`Edmond R. Bannon, Esq.
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`601 Lexington Avenue, 52nd Floor
`New York, NY 10022
`
`On Behalf of Respondent OFS Fitel, LLC:
`
`Bradley J. Olson, Esq.
`BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP
`1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 500
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`Li Via Hand Delivery
`El Via Express Delivery
`O Via First Class Mail
`El Other:
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`[11 Via Express Delivery
`0 Via First Class Mail
`O Other:
`
`O Via Hand Delivery
`0 Via Express Delivery
`El Via First Class Mail
`0 Other:
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket