k
`
`_
`
`_
`
`Gibson. Dunn &Crutcher LLP
`
`-
`‘
`
`fifliwfi
`‘/"‘
`"
`. NuM3Ei
`
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY101660193
`Tet 212.351.4000
`www.gibsondunn.cum
`
`' ~
`
`Josh Krevitt
`
`'
`
`I
`
`“
`
`‘
`
`O
`
`C3‘
`
`(L7
`
`'
`‘_-_\A-‘un--“.............;........
`.
`Qibce oi the
`
`_ 'S‘*‘3'°@'¥ _'
`'
`‘5"? "Bede
`€0rn~m1ss.|@n
`
`r
`
`Direct+1212.351.2490
`Fax:+1212.351.6390
`JKrevi|t@gibsendurm.com
`
`November
`
`2,2015
`
`VIA COURIER
`
`"
`
`‘
`
`1
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary
`United States Intemational Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W.
`’
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`Re: In the Matter of Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices, Systems, and Components
`Uiereof;
`Inv. N0. 337-TA—
`'
`
`Dear Secretary Barton:
`
`Inc. against proposed
`Enclosed for filing on behalf of Complainant Fitbit,
`(collectively, “Proposed
`Respondents AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone and BodyMedia,
`Inc.
`Respondents”) are documents in support of Complainant’s request that the Commission
`commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of l930, as amended.
`Pursuant to the Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, request for confidential
`treatment of Fitbit’s Complaint and Confidential Exhibits 38C-40C is transmitted
`concurrently with this submission.
`
`Accordingly, Complainant Fitbit submits the following documents for filingi
`
`1. An original and eight (8) copies of the verified Non-Confidential Complaint and the
`Public Interest Statement, one (1) CD of the accompanying Non-Confidential
`exhibits. (19 CPR §§ 201.6(¢), 210.4(o(2), 210.8(a)(l)(i), and 210.8(5).)
`
`2. An original and eight (8) copies of the verified Confidential Complaint and the
`Public Interest Statement, one (1) CD of the accompanying Confidential Exhibits
`38C-40C. (I9 CFR §§ 201.6(c), 210.4(t)(2), 2l0.8(a)(1)(i), and 210.8(b).)
`
`3. Two (2) additional copies of both the verified Non-Confidential Complaint and the
`Public Interest Statement and two (2) CDs of the Non-Confidential exhibits, one (1)
`each
`for
`service
`upon each of
`the Proposed "Respondents.
`(19 CFR
`§§ 2l0.8(a)(l)(iii)A.)
`
`4. Two (2) additional copies of the verified Confidential Complaint and the Public
`Interest Statement and two (2) CDs of the Confidential Exhibits 38C-40C, one (1)
`
`Beijing ~ Brussels - Century Oily - Dallas - Denver - Dubai ~Hong Kong - London - Los Angeles » Munich
`New York - Orange County - Pale Alto - Paris - San Francisco - S50 Paulo - Singapore - Washington, D.C.
`
`

`

`GEESUN DUNN
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`November 2, 2015
`Page 2
`
`service upon each of
`each for
`§§ 210.8(a)(1)(iii).)
`
`the Proposed Respondents.
`
`(19 CFR
`
`5. The original certified copies of U.S. Patent No. 8,920,332 (“the ’332 patent”), U.S.
`Patent No. 8,868,377 (“the ’377’patent”), and U,S. Patent No. 9,089,760 (“the ’760
`patent”) (collectively, “the Patents at Issue” or “Fitbit’s Patents”); and three (3)
`additional copies of the patents on CD, cited in the Complaint as Exhibits 1-3 (19
`CFR §§ 210.8(a)(l)(iii) and 210.12(a)(9)(i).)
`
`6. The original certified copies of the assigmnents for the Patents at Issue and three (3)
`additional copies of the assignments for the Patents at Issue on CD, cited in the
`Complaint as Exhibits 4-6. (19 CFR §§ 210.8(a)(l)(iii) and 2lO.l2(a)(9)(ii).)
`
`7. The original certified copies of the prosecution histories of the Patents at Issue
`included in the Complaint as Appendices A, C, and E, and three (3) additional copies
`ofeach on separate CD5. (19 CFR§2l0.12(c)(1).)
`
`8. Four (4) copies on separate CD5 of patent and technical reference documents
`identified in each of the prosecution histories of the Patents at Issue, included in the
`Complaint as Appendices B, D, and F. (19 CFR § 2l0.l2(c)(2).)
`
`Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Josh Krevitt
`
`JK/jcf
`
`Enclosures:
`
`

`

`§iEStON_1}L§'i’~§iN
`
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`
`200 Park Avenue
`New York. NY 10166-0193
`I8! 212.351.4000
`www.gibs0ndunn.com
`
`C
`
`Josh Krevilt
`Direct: +1 212.351.2490
`Fax: +1 212.351.6390
`JKrevitt@gibsondunn.com
`
`/
`
`November 2, 2015
`
`VIA COURIER
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary
`United States International Trade Commission
`500 E. Street, S.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`Re: In the Matter of Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices, Systems, and Components
`Thereof" Inv. N0. 33 7'-TA­
`
`Dear Secretary Barton:
`
`In accordance with Commission Rules 210.6 and 210.5, 19 CFR §§ 201.01 and
`210.5, Complainant Fitbit requests confidential
`treatment of the business information
`contained in its Complaint and Confidential Exhibits 38C-40C. A certification is provided
`below pursuant to 19 C.F.R. §§ 201.06 and 210.5 requesting confidential treatment of Fitbit’s
`Complaints and Confidential Exhibits 38C-40C.
`
`The information for which confidential treatment is sought is proprietary commercial
`information not otherwise publicly available. Specifically, the Complaint and Confidential
`Exhibits 38C-40C (which contain swom declarations of Fitbit’s CFO and CTO and a list of
`licensed entities for the Patents-at-lssue) contain proprietary and confidential business and
`technical
`information of Complainant Fitbit and Fitbit’s investments in the domestic
`industry.
`
`The information described above qualifies as confidential business information pursuant to
`Commission Rule 210.6 because:
`
`a)
`
`lt is not available to the public;
`
`b) Unauthorized disclosure of such information could cause substantial hann to the
`competitive position of Fitbit; and
`
`c)
`
`Its disclosure could impair the Commissions’ ability to obtain infomiation necessary
`to perform its statutory function.
`
`Beijing ~ Brussels ' Century City ~ Dallas - Denver ~ Dubai ~ Hong Kong ~ London - Les Angeles - Mumch
`New York - Orange County - Palo Alto ~ Paris - San Francisco - S30 Paulo - Singapore - Washington. D.C.
`
`

`

`GZBSQNDUNN
`
`The Honorable Lisa R. Barton
`November 2, 2015
`Page 2
`
`Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions
`
`Sincerely,
`
`"
`
`%w\~Km-JW
`Josh Krevitt
`
`JIUjef
`
`/
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASTHNGTON, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WEARABLE ACTIVITY
`TRACKINGDEVICES,SYSTEMS,AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`.
`.'
`I“"““g““‘°“ N°- -——~—
`
`COMPLAINANT FITBIT, INC.’S STATEMENT ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST
`
`In support of its Complaint, filed on October 30, 2015 and titled “In the Matter of Certain
`
`Wearable Activity Tracking Devices, Systems, and Components Thereof,” Complainant Fitbit,
`
`Inc. (“Fitbit”) respectfiilly submits this Statement of Public Interest, as required by 19 C.F.R.
`
`§ 210.8(b)
`
`for the commencement of an investigation directed to -proposed Respondents
`
`AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone and BodyMedia, Inc. (collectively, “Jawbone”).
`
`The present statement addresses the four public interest factors that must be considered
`
`before issuing an exclusion order pursuant to l9 U.S.C. § l337(d)(1): (1) public health and
`
`welfare in the United States, (2) competitive conditions in the United States economy, (3) the
`
`production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and (4) United States
`
`consumers. As discussed below, none of the four statutorily-enumerated public interest factors
`
`counsels against the issuance of an exclusion order directed to proposed Respondents’ infringing
`
`wearable fitness and activity trackers identified in the Complaint (the “Accused Products”).
`
`Indeed, .The Commission has found that an exclusion order would violate the public
`
`interest only in a limited number of cases in which “inadequate supply [of the articles at issue]
`
`within the United States—by both the patentee and the domestic licensees—meant that an
`
`exclusion order would deprive the public of products necessary for some important health or
`
`welfare need: energy efiicient automobiles, basic scientific research, or hospital equipment.”
`
`Spansion, Inc. v. Int’! Trade Comm ’n, 629 F.3d 1331, I360 (Fed. Cir. 2010). See, e.g., Fluidized
`
`Supporting Apparatus, 337-TA—l82/188, I984 WL 63741 (Oct.
`
`I984)
`
`(no therapeutically
`
`

`

`comparable product available to hospital bed for burn patients); Inclined-Field Acceleration
`
`Tubes, 337—TA-67, 0080 WLA594319 (Dec. 19805 (no high-quality domestic altematives to
`
`imported tubes used in nuclear research); Automatic Crankpin Grinders, 337-TA-60, 0079 WL
`
`419349 (Dec. 1979) (no timely supply of parts for automakers to meet congressionally mandated
`
`fuel-efficiency standards).
`
`This investigation does not raise public interest concems of the type and severity at issue
`
`in the aforementioned cases. The ways in which the Accused Products are used as well as the
`
`anticipated effects of an exclusion order on each public interest factor are set forth separately
`
`below.
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`1.
`
`The Requested Remedies Relate To Wearable Fitness and Activity
`Trackers
`
`The Accused Products are wearable fimess and activity trackers, which are electronic
`
`devices used to monitor various indicia of health and fitness. For example—and depending on
`
`the version or model of the device used—individuals may wear such devices on their person in
`
`order to track the number of steps they have taken in a given period of time, the amount of
`
`calories they have bumt, the duration and quality of their sleep, or their heart rate.
`
`On information and belief, Jawbone designs the Accused Products, which are then
`
`assembled in China.
`
`The Accused Products compete directly with Fitbit’s own product line of wearable fitness
`
`and activity hackers. Fitbit requests a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order.
`
`2.
`
`The Requested Remedies Do Not Raise Any Significant Public Health,
`Safety, or Welfare Concerns
`
`The requested remedies would have no impact on public health and welfare within the
`
`meaning of 19 C.F.R. § 1337(d), (e), and (1) and 19 C.F.R. §210.8(b). As an initial matter, the
`
`Accused Products provide simply a valuable aid to individual users who wish to monitor their
`
`health and fitness—they are not an irreplaceable tool for the improvement of individual fitness,
`
`nor would their absence be detrimental to individual or public health. Further, even if fitness and
`
`activity trackers were indispensable to public health and welfare in general, there are numerous
`
`2
`
`

`

`alternatives to Jawbone’s specific Accused Products that could fill any void created by an
`
`exclusion order.
`
`Indeed, there are numerous substitutes for the Accused Products available on
`
`the market, most of which provide similar if not identical benefits. Thus, an exclusion order
`
`would not adversely impact public health and welfare.
`
`.
`
`3.
`
`The Requested Remedies Would Not Adversely Affect Competitive
`Conditions in the United States Economy
`
`The requested remedies would not affect competitive conditions in the United States
`
`economy, as the market for wearable fitness and activity trackers is highly competitive. Indeed,
`
`an exclusion order would likely have minima
`
`l
`
`'f any—effects on the supply and availability of
`1
`
`like products, because several substitutes are available to replace Jawbone’s devices on the
`
`market. For example, Fitbit, whose own product line includes at least six different like devices‘
`
`that are directly competitive to Jawbone’s Accused Products, would stand ready to meet any
`
`additional consumer demand for its devices in the event of an exclusion order. Further, a host of
`
`companies that compete directly with Jawbone (e.g., Nike, Adidas, Garmin, Samsung, LG, Sony,
`
`Microsofl, Apple, TomT0m, Basis, Jaybird, Polar, Withings, Misfit, Striiv, Razer, LifeTrak,
`
`Moov, Runstatic, Mio, Basis, Philips) offer acceptable substitutes for the Accused Products and
`
`also should have the capacity to fill any void in supply created by an exclusion order.
`
`For the same reasons, an exclusion order would likely have minimal—if any—effects on
`
`the price of like products. The relevant market is highly competitive, as shown by the large
`
`number of competitors offering substitutes for Jawbone’s devices, and——givena robust supply»
`
`it is unlikely that an exclusion order would cause a surge in the prices of similar products.
`
`Lastly, an exclusion order would not hamper innovation in the industry at large. There is
`
`substantial consumer demand for such products, which ensures adequate economic incentives to
`
`counteract any deterrent effects an exclusion order might have on either potential market entrants
`
`or active market participants.
`
`' The Fitbit Zip, Fitbit One, Fitbit Flex, Fitbit Charge, Fitbit Charge HR, and the Fitbit Surge.
`
`3
`
`

`

`4.
`
`The Requested Remedies Would Not Adversely Affect the Production
`‘of Like or Directly Competitive Articles in the United States
`
`The requested remedies will not adversely affect the production of like or directly
`
`competitive articles in the United States.' The accused Jawbone articles are manufactured in
`
`China, and Fitbit is not aware of any manufacturing operations in the United States that would be
`
`impacted by the issuance of a limited exclusion order. Further, to the best ofFitbit’s knowledge,
`
`the accused Jawbone articles do not contain any components manufactured in the United States.
`
`Therefore, an exclusion order would not have a negative impact on any manufacturing operations
`
`in the United States.
`
`The Requested Remedies Would Not Adversely Impact Consumers
`5.
`Neither an exclusion order nor a cease and desist order would have an adverse impact on
`
`consumers. Given the number of directly competitive products available to replace the Accused
`
`Products, an exclusion order would have—at most—marginal impact on the availability and
`
`price of such devices. Further, Fitbit submits that the devices at issue are sufiiciently similar to
`
`their substitutes—in tenns of functionality, overall quality, and performance—that substitution
`
`of like devices for Jawbone’s devices would not affect consumers on the whole.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Dated: October 28, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`vitt
`Josh
`Beatrice Hahn
`George Stamatopoulos
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10166
`Telephone:
`(212) 351-4000
`Facsimile: (212) 351-4035
`
`Wayne Barsky
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2029 Century Park East, Suite 4000
`Los Angeles, CA 90067-3026
`Tel: (310) 552-8500
`Fax: (310)551-8741
`
`Jason L0
`Jermifer Rho
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`333 South Grand Ave
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
`Tel: (213)229-7153
`Fax: (213) 229-6153
`
`Neema Jalali
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
`San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
`Tel: (415) 393-8258
`Fax: (415) 374-8409
`
`Frederick S. Chung
`Stuart M. Rosenberg
`Alison Watkins
`Quincy Lu
`Christina Chandler Kogan
`Zachary Wood
`Ryan Iwahashi
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1881 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`
`

`

`Telephone: (650) 849-5300
`Facsimile: (650) 349-5333
`
`Andrew Lin
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100
`Dallas, TX 75201-6912
`.
`Tel: (214) 698-3100
`Fax: (214) 571-2900
`
`Counselfor Complainant F itbit, Inc.
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN WEARABLE ACTIVITY TRACKING
`DEVICES, SYSTEMS,ANDCOMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`ti N
`ti
`In
`“*5 g“ °“
`
`°'—-—.
`
`VERIFIED.COMPLAINT OF FITBIT, INC. UNDER
`SECTION 337 OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930, AS AMENDED
`
`Progsed Rgspgndents:
`
`AliphC0m d/b/a Jawbone
`99 Rhode Island Street
`3"’ Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94103
`Telephone: (714) 812-8200
`
`B0dyMedia, Inc.
`Union Trust Building
`501 Grant Street, Suite 1075
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219
`Telephone: (412) 288-9901
`
`Complainant:
`
`Fitbit, Inc.­
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: (877) 623-4997
`
`Counsel for Complainant
`Josh Krevitt
`,
`Beatrice Hahn
`George Starnatopoulos
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, New York 10166
`Telephone: (212) 351-4000
`Facsimile: (212) 351-4035
`
`Wayne Barsky
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2029 Century Park East, Suite 4000
`Los Angeles, CA 90067-3026
`
`­
`

`

`Tel: (310) 552-8500
`Fax: (310) 551-8741
`
`Jason L0
`Jennifer Rho
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`333 South Grand Ave
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
`Tel: (213) 229-7153
`Fax: (213)229-6153
`
`Neema Jalali
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
`San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
`Tel: (415) 393-8258
`Fax: (415) 374-8409
`
`Frederick S. Chung
`Stuart M. Rosenberg
`Alison Watkins
`Quincy Lu
`Christina Chandler Kogan
`Zachary Wood
`Ryan Iwahashi
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1881 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, California 94304
`Telephone: (650) 849-5300
`Facsimile: (650) 849-5333
`
`Andrew Lin
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100
`Dallas, TX 75201-6912
`Tel: (214) 698-3100
`Fax: (214) 571-2900
`
`

`

`3“
`
`‘-'<>‘“L<,',’/"5'_’.’,"4., ~;,>»i::1-W."=11»??=,‘¥¥1"i“alert M?
`
`viz‘;~='=;1»','-"<'-<2‘-1*‘/r'.::.'r='~.'"i:': 7/‘—‘*=;;té/'r:.¢/;l:">'.n'%-1'3?‘-" 1;./,'-wt:-;=,".--‘i2
`re. v.’--an
`' ;.:;¢ )1-'¢:."~P
`:1-,'.=,'u
`
`
`*4 '»-‘-="~was-»'*'=-:.;;>1@1-=2"I=:?<.w>¢1=w-in:-'e»f~.‘=.'1.’<.>a.::=;:<
`
`’
`’
`
`:=<.~_».r’:¢Y/:5' '
`"
`‘ "
`'
`"
`6’
`f’
`1~”»r‘,,~'.~
`5/:
`,-':.‘/ W’
`wot-.~.~ =.'»- '
`-.c,,
`'ExhIb1t”t‘l//W ~
`~f:‘*’
`J ~ ~@.»~m»;~
`a
`I
`»
`._,
`..
`,
`.
`,,;
`’“>>V‘
`._.,.- 4, ,3,,},,V_.._ H l.,,,
`,,:/f...,
`r_,,.,_. ,,,_.»,g‘_, =r
`.,
`., ...(.
`,
`é,
`.. NF;
`1’
`¢U_H..,r
`,_,(,.,,.4 Nib ,_
`W‘
`'
`~;~»-M
`'...»:"-aw‘
`’»1ai'§=:-w-41.1-<»&'s»';-'.»¢'av .-1"’/,.1:r-¢'--»';1..,=.=»%-'-1,1:-J6"
`‘.".'.<1.--.'.-'..'-11:4”-~f?'-/<'r
`*1-we
`me‘
`/W’;
`<4:1'-/‘"7-i""-1m’='
`».§'.."?,= A/I-'1--'-."’:
`.,;:<1?
`wt.-¢'.§’N*,:45)-'/i ~~")»";1»~.»-~.»r.
`r
`,,
`,~.
`.1‘./-\-..@,;4.,/../,/ J.
`. M .
`
`>_,/‘.5’;;.,¢. .
`~=r~:-'.-=1=-1*."
`V2,:
`on
`imca H .=r_n
`a/_~:,~;=»v'-,_~r>..,-:;¢~=:>'w,~.1r;'~.4_<.<.g;-m~a,~_»=:r='
`
`/-'¢:‘,m.i ,7‘;Z§‘1?r‘i'r'55‘},VFwf5s§-7‘»-zr./1!»:-u-'w'~mew --==".4:<-.~r.-':.»*»"1="J'z;=~>9»;;;.:/z,.1:7‘+==
`.1//1.» a 5
`, 5,-;/M;
`:.,;_:__/’.;_»5:-/93:,;;.:5:;=-flfl-fi2,.,“.;;'-‘,1/V ‘ml;
`,\¢,;, ,,<,';“:,_:\:,"é-iw r-w;;-,~,-i;,_,_.;@;~>..>-.~J,,1»,»<¢m..»,wimafizz‘--r~‘@2:<;,
`
`;,!w<-,.--,‘..\_.~r.~,_~-,,. 1',--,. 41,;,1; 1;-_'mi» »r
`-,_»'v<rr;:;;-,.,,-.4,'4
`
`
`1% figfr‘/I!/I’,i,';"19,‘i~?,:¢.;.~wv‘=’§.¥4@2,1»2*;w1r~<-;;r':;we;M
`2;.»»¢:;w<t§¢<§*<a:1.w&;;»1.@iw;??Z
`¢>;@-ea"-;=<;€»;
`
`‘z~,n-a::.»;;¢gm,/?.,:-4.1 *::s:'.{"."{"/-"1?3»,"
`
`TABLE OF EXHIBITS
`
`"'
`
`»l)¢‘4}
`'.~.+,~1‘
`’"r;(
`Certified Copy of United States Patent Number 8,920,332 (the “’332 Patent”)
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Certified Copy of United States Patent Number 8,868,377 (the “’377 Patent”)
`
`Certified Copy of United States Patent Number 9,089,760 (the “’760 Patent”)
`Certified Copy of Assignment Papers for the ’332 Patent
`
`'
`
`Certified Copy of Assignment Papers for the ’377 Patent
`
`Certified Copy of Assignment Papers for the ’760 Patent
`
`pInfringement Claim Chart Comparing the ’332 Patent with the Jawbone UP3
`Infringement Claim Chart Comparing the ’332,Patent with the Jawbone UP4
`
`Infiingement Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent with the Jawbone U? Move
`
`_ 10.
`ll.
`
`Infringement Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent with the Jawbone UP2
`i Infringement Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent with the Jawbone UP3
`
`12.
`
`'13.
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`l8.
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`Infringement Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent with the Jawbone UP4
`
`Infringement Claim Chart Comparing the ’760 Patent with the Jawbone UP Move
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’332 Patent With the Fitbit Surge
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’332 Patent With the Fitbit Charge HR
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent With the Fitbit Surge­
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent With the Fitbit Charge HR
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent With the Fitbit Charge
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent With the Fitbit Flex
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent With the Fitbit One '
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’377 Patent With the Fitbit Zip
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’760 Patent With the Fitbit Flex
`
`Domestic Indus1:ryClaim Chart Comparing the ’760 Patent With the Fitbit One
`
`Domestic Industry Claim Chart Comparing the ’760 Patent With the Fitbit Zip
`
`List of Foreign Counterparts to the Patents-at-Issue
`
`Copies of Receipts from Purchase of Representative Accused Products
`
`Copies of Photographs of Jawbone Products
`
`(a) UP move
`
`g
`
`i
`
`

`

`1 H 4
`; ¥'»'/_'/ 9,"-1'-!='/1’=_-'-"/211;?!‘fi'<?~@1<‘i'{,jf"=',
`'
`>7'l5li¢~'é"\"l I5‘ Xi"?
`4
`rt wt!-'
`
`i-’="%~2§Z;';-;~-:+,s:zE‘::-;»-:»-;.-1-tr; »:,'~‘,"?-¢¢"=_-"',zlf§,‘=1.i'-,».-41;‘;
`
`V
`
`1'-';/J.
`
`E»-‘a~"J'."'1"-4 ~"“~'1‘."»‘,L':i1’ 1‘j»_5'<1,Y'~‘-Fr‘:1 -»I""‘1-"-_ .1.—"“95-'.'-'*,‘/4;1='ff.91:;1’t§s%FI?'
`3/1&5’;;s:z;%~;§<:.@':2'flab};-5£;:=é'=‘£a‘:'.-'.:-=5’-:,;-yi»?-=~;.yagq;<=¢:¢
`
`':'//
`'-‘» ,H;‘-.,;.",,
`‘ii?
`'1-‘F-'11-“~‘;‘-'='-_''11 '2/W7‘/2;"
`,'.-»'f.-'=;':.;:'z';,;_:<1;i/1;=f"--"<;¢-».,;-;»1';';-'
`,.'7;:-;=i;;"'
`
`KI
`
`"/.r.,',
`
`¢
`
`f>.-;'i1
`
`‘I/1» rg.
`
`'
`
`-" 4""/‘YY»"?n‘,‘
`
`"-in ‘
`
`~11]11 Ilia"-K1-'~
`<
`,
`/1»
`. at
`,,
`:,-&..¢/
`/3’¥f,4:¢ W” ,./..’._';’»‘,/=-'
`- _'5,'_.7~. :';'.'—;,'
`‘V »/'
`/1..
`,
`.
`V,»/t
`.../,
`v,~:'»/;<,-5 ~_r-=-->4
`<»'>',at; 1' =',.>,<.z,-» 1
`
`::,l'4”¢@l_“/k‘)/';'4):f1v;}£')'-’vI"?_'»»,,;¢ >1»
`;‘
`
`".1
`
`-::' ~“;’'"
`'»~‘"~;
`/
`~
`0
`0
`[J
`M.
`.
`/
`5%.,”
`»_;,>.j-j
`2,.»
`, __., /, 45 ,‘ _g-.i,- .11 ’V\;,—yi‘~‘41.,"l'1VY4i":_,-,'.,1
`4,.
`< v:_
`_/,~_.,
`\_ via-‘Iv
`.
`,
`.'
`K! .
`4
`.,,
`._
`-
`»
`.~»,=/=:;,'~;:.
`¢-:;'-,<¢',;w;.;,1;-;;:,:w:<~=:'-=:=.=";¢
`;:.;',
`.~ <w¢_.~¥.;:%,4¢r=-,.-
`Y-.:,;-4=:'¢:;=~»;-2'/'1)1>‘~*Z><.:—:@~"1';=,-'-:;->._~.-
`P; #1"
`lam,
`--
`
`/
`
`'—
`)
`
`1-,’,
`/,r1=;2-r»:-'v,;»;»§f-Q-.-1»::.<.~~
`-,5 ,.1-'_-..
`,
`"I"
`.
`,,,¢
`._ 1,'t"rf',/
`<
`/3;);-=;
`.-
`-,,-;-/1
`/1:».--.».-.u -.»'--1,.-2--.'
`V- 1:»;
`
`(b) UP2
`
`(c) UP3
`
`(d) UP4
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`'34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38C.
`
`39C
`
`40C
`
`Sales Web Pages from Jawbone.com
`
`Copies of Support and Infonnation Web Pages for the UP Move
`
`Copies of Support and Information Web Pages for the UP2
`
`I
`
`Copies of Support and Information Web Pages for the UP3
`
`Copies of Support and Information Web Pages for the UP4
`Videos from Jawbone.com Support Pages
`
`Fitbit Registration Statement —Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1
`
`Fitbit Quarterly Report —Form 10-Q
`Jawbone Company Information
`
`'
`
`i
`
`B0dyMedia Company Information and Acquisition Press Release
`Declaration of William Zerella (Confidential)
`
`Declaration of Eric N. Friedman (Confidential)
`
`List of Licensed Entities for the Patents-at-Issue (Confidential)
`
`_
`
`-ii
`
`

`

`~
`
`74%
`
`“W
`
`XII]
`J~ M
`
`¢
`
`~’
`h '1
`< YSICBL
`/ ~'
`5*
`II Nfl‘,x§§
`a .
`.»»
`
`/.-=~~.-'~.,‘»»;v.'.c-;-,:;->3:1.:-'.r/mg;
`".4: 1' »:'::-,"~z
`»*'~:=:.;:w/;';;~/.1 '»_'=~"'4/,=,-'=»¢V ;:.:—;;.;1;->i=5:;'-3'l~C§~.1q}.7‘
`/
`-.1._-,1.-1/-;'v,~.;;»/'5;-=;,.;.,;,;v,'.au,.~..4.
`r
`".
`‘ Q ’P».~:...~;"
`/rm‘
`»“’<»-‘r
`.,-
`
`Q46 £52'1as-;:»'>/.'»g:;=':'>E§%:<:¢>»»??§1.w;§2:»;:,.,:;<z4;;:2.:.;4.':.:.'*'£!-33-::§:2":5"i*'%'e§3<';-¢~',-1¢>:a’~';/¢-,¢=;<,@-.~..
`an", »_,».
`,¢w,,.._.
`,,.fl....1.;,,.,,,,
`,}_.H ,,.“,;5,_../’,)..,,_. ,,;,,_.fi/,,..,
`.14s>.'¢</...
`.
`_.
`..
`_,.,.
`J
`“’
`’ &*.:;y' w ’ M1!/?,.< ‘/~>~",
`"£/I/‘Q91 '~;»»-M2
`.»fi7"i‘-"*3->551" L. »=.u¢.~::~:1.=¢g:.=1a' 1;»,-/—-;'»:;;'£='/'5'-'5 Q;-7' R35;/»::SL'/"{§§'¥;;-5§'5':}§;17§:
`= ,,r
`*
`*
`- ~14/:'_r-?§i»r¢-.~s+r.-..'1.-4§g¢¢<;+,e.e;$1.;4;;%#¢;~Q»;-%<p*=»=~;=-vn.mw-=~<='=..
`~/J
`11/2:1’ ' #1,»;-:.<s;=..-.1.-.L-:.»v=:. u<:2=»;¢?¢s4~‘é:¢%i4%--12*;-.--,~.¢.->-4,17%-.@
`_ _
`_
`.:.,.-2:‘-Y1/.s,~:.~q.<»»-.: 1..
`»,~;
`W
`/
`_
`<
`,
`_,
`.g,gr...
`. My 11.1,,
`.
`.. _.,,.
`, I‘,
`..-.
`,-. .
`. .,,_/,A
`.
`,<_A,,=,,./
`, »
`~!~
`4.,
`.
`V11‘,/,»an "-v,-'J.‘\“:L\'/-1%,/,»~=-.._-./,.-
`...--(Q.
`.1
`~»....»...
`.
`..
`. .../_. »=/,~/.-...-,;»-,»»/».>.
`~~,-..(.W.-»...=.‘..' -
`;'_-.;.-1'--.,»1.>,
`.1 .:v_~3'_,'..»‘aw-:.;=4,~.,-;..,=.=,'/‘eh..r:>:,,..
`=;,;
`»»,-;.'.;,~
`.,'<;,<,‘¢_=~,/.»-~- ):\[-“,‘~'_’*»§-:1
`:.,/',=¢,.;;:~;--,~,,-.,_/,-,,;-11
`W.
`;;,;,,,/:­
`
`:-=><;s;;j‘=1>-'/B‘-3:5»/¢%»%_4&*a<:.!"£?;‘:£5Y<"=n;¢Jc:F1:;:'->"-‘I?-.&*~=-:.<..;9z.'~g;1;.*»;>>,;;at/Lf§%.~e'<.;-.;~4<;§,.,/...‘<¢m<§;§;m=;,.».;~;§.l$;g».,#t5¢;%~v,,:m;y-—f.:
`§Z"1'7§-‘</°%€.*.1:‘..’==’=i.§<>§§§I-5?¢’>i1l~%-.T¢m§*£§€fi.i%:":*?’:‘-‘¢‘i"${5$-a?/.-i13&*'53%%:$';:;z
`i-
`m‘:~:<,»..-,...»f:e.<i@<:;¢m 1% c:$<-@.*§:*@e*~=-.%*;=%>s¢».»?1>"<;,f':2é
`
`TABLE OF PHYSICAL EXHIBITS
`
`':':_1;~:
`
`/
`
`Jawbone UP Move
`
`Jawbone UP2
`
`Jawbone UP3
`
`Jawbone UP4
`
`Fitbit Surge
`
`Fitbit Charge HR
`
`Fitbit Charge
`Fitbit Flex
`Fitbit One
`
`Fitbit Zip
`
`I
`
`\
`
`­
`

`

`APPENDIX OF ADDITIONAL MATERIALS
`
`Appendix A
`
`Certified File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,920,332
`
`Appendix B:
`
`Technical References Cited During Prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 8,920,332
`
`Appendix C:
`
`Certified File History of U.S. Patent No. 8,868,377
`
`i
`
`Appendix D:
`
`Technical References Cited During Prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 8,868,377
`
`Appendix E:
`
`Certified File History of U.S. Patent No. 9,089,760
`
`Appendix F:
`
`Technical References Cited During Prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 9,089,760
`
`iv
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT OF FITBIT, INC. UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE TARIFF ACT ...i
`
`TABLE OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................. .. i
`
`TABLE OF PHYSICAL EXHIBITS ........................................................................................... ..iii
`
`APPENDIX OF ADDITIONAL MATERIALS .......................................................................... .. iv
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS ............. ...................-.........................................................................
`
`.. v
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ .. 1
`
`COMPLAINANT ............................................................................................................. .. 3
`
`III.
`
`PROPOSED RESPONDENTS ......................................................................................... .. 4
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`A1iphCom, _Inc.d/b/a Jawbone ...............................................................................
`
`..4
`
`BodyMedia, Inc............... ..'..................................................................................... ..5
`
`IV.
`
`THE PRODUCTS—AT-ISSUE..........................................................................................
`
`.. 5
`
`V.
`
`THE PATENTS-AT-ISSUE ............................................................................................. .. 6
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`The ’332 Patent ...................................................................................................... ..6
`
`The ’377 Patent ...................................................................................................... ..8
`
`The ’760 Patent ...................................................................................................... ..9
`
`Licenses...........,.................................................................................................... ..10
`
`VI.
`
`UNLAWFUL AND UNFAIR ACTS OF THE PROPOSED RESPONDENTS .............. 10
`
`E.
`
`Patent Claims at Issue ............................................................................................l3
`
`VII.
`
`SPECIFIC INSTANCES OF UNFAIR IMPORTATION AND SALE ........................... 13
`
`VIII. HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE ITEM NUMBERS .......................................... .. 14
`
`-v
`
`

`

`DOMESTIC INDUSTRY ............................................... ..
`
`A.
`
`Fitbit’s~Articles Protected by the Patents-at-Issue
`
`B.
`
`. Fitbit’s Investment in the Domestic Industry ........
`
`RELATED LITIGATION .............................................. ..
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED ................................................... ..
`
`vi
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`'
`
`l.
`
`Fitbit,
`
`Inc.
`
`(“Fitbit” or “Complainant”)
`
`requests
`
`that
`
`the United States
`
`International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) institute an investigation into violations of
`
`Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, by Respondents AliphCom
`
`d/b/a Jawbone (“Jawbone”) and BodyMedia, Inc. (“BodyMedia”) (collectively, “Respondents”)
`
`2.
`
`Fitbit brings this Complaint in order to. protect its domestic industry from the
`
`widespread, willful, and destructive unfair competition caused by the patent infringement of
`
`Respondents, which develops and distributes the infringing UP Move, UP2, UP3,and’UP4, as
`
`well as the UP App.
`
`3.
`
`This Complaint
`
`is based on the Respondents’ unlawful and unauthorized
`
`importation into the United States, sale for importation, and/or.sale within the United States afier
`
`importation of wearable fitness and activity tracker devices.
`
`_
`
`4.
`
`Fitbit
`
`is a company that helps people lead healthier, more active lives by
`
`empowering them with data, inspiration, and guidance to reach their goals. Fitbit is an innovator
`
`in the health and fitness market, addressing key needs with advanced technology embedded in
`
`cutting-edge but simple-to-use products and services. Since 2007, Fitbit has led the way in
`
`health and fitness in both the U.S. and abroad, growing rapidly into a leading global health and
`
`fitness brand. Fitbit has built an extensive and acclaimed domestic industry and holds the
`
`leading position in the U.S. connected activity tracker market.
`
`'
`
`5.
`
`Fitbit welcomes competition, as it has always worked hard to find new and better
`
`ways to build the best products for consumers.
`
`Jawbone, by contrast, has continually played
`
`catchup to Fitbit, emulating Fitbit and infiinging Fitbit’s patents.
`
`

`

`6.
`
`Respondents’ products
`
`infringe, either
`
`‘literally or under
`
`the doctrine, of
`
`equivalents, at least one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,920,332 (“the ‘332 patent”), U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,868,377 (“the ‘377 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 9,089,760 (“the ‘760 patent”)
`
`(collectively, the “patents-at-issue” or the “Fitbit Patents”). The patents-at-issue are valid and
`
`enforceable United States Patents.
`
`7.
`
`The Fitbit Patents relate. to technology used in wearable fitness and activity
`
`tracker devices to monitor and report on health and wellness metrics.
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, Respondents’ activity tracker devices infringe at least
`
`the following exemplary claims of the patents-at-issue:
`
`.
`
`-.
`
`.
`
`-=.;~;~;
`
`.
`
`--4,~‘:‘~'3~%;.-a-.=..,;1
`
`*
`
`.
`
`Y?
`
`j...~.>?=53“§-"~?§{$°;E‘~¥*“.%~¢»-~22
`
`8,92o,332
`
`8,868,377
`
`9,089,760
`
`1, 4-5, 13-17
`
`1, 2-4, 7-9, 10, 11, 16, 25, and 27-28
`
`1, 2-12, 13, 14-15,118-21
`
`~
`
`9.
`
`A certified copy of the ‘S32 patent accompanies this complaint as Exhibit 1.
`
`Fitbit owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in this patent.
`
`10.
`
`A certified copy of the ’377 patent accompanies this complaint as Exhibit 2.
`
`Fitbit owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in this patent
`
`'
`
`ll.
`
`A certified copy of the "760 patent accompanies this complaint as Exhibit 3.
`
`Fitbit owns by assignment the entire right, title, and interest in this patent.
`
`‘ Claims in bold are independent claims.
`
`2
`
`<
`
`­
`

`

`12.
`
`The Respondents’ activities with respect to the importation into the United States,
`
`the sale _for importation into the United States, and/or the sale within the United States afier
`
`importation of certain wearable fitness and activity tracker devices, described more fully infia,
`
`are unlawful under 19 U.S.C. § l337(a)(1)(B)(i) in that they constitute infringement of the valid
`
`and enforceable patents-at-issue.
`
`i
`
`13.
`
`Accordingly, Fitbit seeks relief from the Commission in the fomi of a limited
`
`exclusion order excluding fiom entry into the United States activity tracking devices, systems,
`
`and components thereof that infi'inge the asserted patents. Fitbit further seeks a cease and desist
`
`order halting the importation, sale, offer for sale, marketing, advertising, or soliciting of activity
`
`tracking devices, systems, and components thereof owned, held, or stored by the Respondents
`
`and their related companies that infiinge the valid and enforceable Fitbit patents.
`
`-
`
`14.
`
`As required by Section 337(a)(2) and defined by Section 337(a)(3), an industry in
`
`the United States relating to the patents-at-issue exists by virtue of at least Fitbit’s investment in
`
`plant and equipment, employment of labor and capital, and/or investment in the exploitation with
`
`respect to the patents-at-issue.
`
`II.
`
`COMPLAINANT
`
`15.
`
`Fitbit is a United States company organized and existingas a corporation under
`
`the laws of Delaware. Fitbit maintains its principal place of business at 405 Howard Street, San
`
`Francisco, Califomia 94105.
`
`16.
`
`Fitbit is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in and to the ’332
`
`patent; ’377 patent, and ’760 patent. (See Exhibits 4-6.)
`
`,
`
`17.
`
`Fitbit designs, develops, markets, and sells or licenses: (i) the Fitbit Surge; (ii) the
`
`Fitbit ChargeHR, (iii) the Fitbit Charge, (iv) the Fitbit Flex; (v) the Fitbit One; and (vi) the Fitbit
`
`3
`
`

`

`Zip. Fitbit sells or licenses its products in the United States, and worldwide, including through
`
`its online store, its corporate wellness offering, distributors, and retailers.
`
`18.
`
`Fitbit developed the technology that is protected by the paten