throbber
Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 13
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF KANSAS
`
`NO. 18-2302-CM
`
`
`
`
`STEPHANIE ANTHONY,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,
`HOME DEPOT INC. d/b/a HOME DEPOT,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`The parties agree that during the course of discovery it may be necessary to disclose
`
`certain confidential information relating to the subject matter of this action. They agree
`
`that certain categories of such information should be treated as confidential, protected from
`
`disclosure outside this litigation, and used only for purposes of prosecuting or defending
`
`this action and any appeals. The parties jointly request entry of this proposed Protective
`
`Order to limit the disclosure, dissemination, and use of certain identified categories of
`
`confidential information.
`
`The parties assert in support of their request that protection of the identified
`
`categories of confidential information is necessary because Plaintiff has requested that
`
`Home Depot’s produce “all versions of Home Depot policies, procedures, by-laws, rules
`
`and regulations in effect in June 2016 which relate to preventing or avoiding shopper’s
`
`injuries.” Home Depot’s responsive documents are internal, non-public, and sensitive
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 2 of 13
`
`commercial information, which describe in detail Home Depot’s policies and procedures.
`
`The policies and procedures are proprietary to Home Depot and used by Home Depot to
`
`conduct an industry-leading retail home improvement business. Home Depot has a
`
`commercial and competitive interest in protecting such policies and procedures from public
`
`disclosure.
`
`For good cause shown under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), the court grants the parties’ joint
`
`request and hereby enters the following Protective Order:
`
`1.
`
`Scope. All documents and materials produced in the course of discovery of
`
`this case, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, all deposition
`
`testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively
`
`“documents”), are subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as set forth
`
`below. As there is a presumption in favor of open and public judicial proceedings in the
`
`federal courts, this Order will be strictly construed in favor of public disclosure and open
`
`proceedings wherever possible.
`
`2.
`
`Definition of Confidential Information.
`
` As used in this Order,
`
`“Confidential Information” is defined as information that the producing party designates
`
`in good faith has been previously maintained in a confidential manner and should be
`
`protected from disclosure and use outside the litigation because its disclosure and use is
`
`restricted by statute or could potentially cause harm to the interests of disclosing party or
`
`nonparties. For purposes of this Order, the parties will limit their designation of
`
`“Confidential Information” to the following categories of information or documents:
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 3 of 13
`
`Home Depot’s policies, procedures, by-laws, rules, and/or regulations; Home Depot’s
`
`investigative materials; Plaintiff’s medical records; and Plaintiff’s employment/personnel
`
`records.
`
`Information or documents that are available to the public may not be designated as
`
`Confidential Information.
`
`3.
`
`Form and Timing of Designation. The producing party may designate
`
`documents as containing Confidential Information and therefore subject to protection
`
`under this Order by marking or placing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “the
`
`marking”) on the document and on all copies in a manner that will not interfere with the
`
`legibility of the document. As used in this Order, “copies” includes electronic images,
`
`duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions that contain the Confidential Information.
`
`The marking will be applied prior to or at the time the documents are produced or disclosed.
`
`Applying the marking to a document does not mean that the document has any status or
`
`protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order.
`
`Copies that are made of any designated documents must also bear the marking, except that
`
`indices, electronic databases, or lists of documents that do not contain substantial portions
`
`or images of the text of marked documents and do not otherwise disclose the substance of
`
`the Confidential Information are not required to be marked. By marking a designated
`
`document as confidential, the designating attorney thereby certifies that the document
`
`contains Confidential Information as defined in this Order.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 4 of 13
`
`4.
`
`Inadvertent Failure to Designate. Inadvertent failure to designate any
`
`document or material as containing Confidential Information will not constitute a waiver
`
`of an otherwise valid claim of confidentiality pursuant to this Order, so long as a claim of
`
`confidentiality is asserted within 30 days after discovery of the inadvertent failure.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Depositions. Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if
`
`designated as such when the deposition is taken or within a reasonable time period after
`
`receipt of the deposition transcript. Such designation must be specific as to the portions of
`
`the transcript and/or any exhibits to be protected.
`
`6.
`
`Protection of Confidential Material.
`
`(a) General Protections. Designated Confidential Information must be
`
`used or disclosed solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this lawsuit, including
`
`any appeals.
`
`(b) Who May View Designated Confidential Information. Except
`
`with the prior written consent of the designating party or prior order of the court, designated
`
`Confidential Information may only be disclosed to the following persons:
`
`(1) The parties to this litigation, including any employees, agents,
`and representatives of the parties;1
`
`
`
`
`1If the confidential documents contain highly sensitive trade secrets or other highly sensitive com-
`petitive or confidential information and disclosure to another party would result in demonstrable
`harm to the disclosing party, then the parties may stipulate or move for the establishment of an
`additional category of protection, (e.g., Attorneys’ Eyes Only) that prohibits disclosure of such
`documents or information to that category or that limits disclosure only to specifically designated
`in-house counsel or party representative(s) whose assistance is reasonably necessary to the conduct
`of the litigation and who agree to be bound by the terms of the Order.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 5 of 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(2)
`
`Counsel for the parties and employees and agents of counsel;
`
`(3) The court and court personnel, including any special master
`appointed by the court, and members of the jury;
`
`
`(4)
`
`Court reporters, recorders, and videographers engaged for
`depositions;
`
`(5) Any mediator appointed by the court or jointly selected by the
`parties;
`
`(6) Any expert witness, outside consultant, or investigator retained
`specifically in connection with this litigation, but only after
`such persons have completed the certification contained in
`Attachment A, Acknowledgment and Agreement to be Bound;
`
`(7) Any potential, anticipated, or actual fact witness and his or her
`counsel, but only to the extent such confidential documents or
`information will assist the witness in recalling, relating, or
`explaining facts or in testifying, and only after such persons
`have completed the certification contained in Attachment A;
`
`(8)
`
`(9)
`
`The author or recipient of the document (not including a person
`who received the document in the course of the litigation);
`
`Independent providers of document reproduction, electronic
`discovery, or other litigation services retained or employed
`specifically in connection with this litigation; and
`
`(10) Other persons only upon consent of the producing party and on
`
`such conditions as the parties may agree.
`
`(c) Control of Documents. The parties must take reasonable efforts to
`
`prevent unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of documents designated as containing
`
`Confidential Information pursuant to the terms of this Order. Counsel for the parties must
`
`maintain a record of those persons, including employees of counsel, who have reviewed or
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 6 of 13
`
`been given access to the documents along with the originals of the forms signed by those
`
`persons acknowledging their obligations under this Order.
`
`7.
`
`Filing of Confidential Information. In the event a party seeks to file any
`
`document containing Confidential Information subject to protection under this Order with
`
`the court, that party must take appropriate action to insure that the document receives
`
`proper protection from public disclosure including: (a) filing a redacted document with the
`
`consent of the party who designated the document as confidential; (b) where appropriate
`
`(e.g., in relation to discovery and evidentiary motions), submitting the document solely for
`
`in camera review; or (c) when the preceding measures are inadequate, seeking permission
`
`to file the document under seal by filing a motion for leave to file under seal in accordance
`
`with D. Kan. Rule 5.4.6.
`
`Nothing in this Order will be construed as a prior directive to allow any document
`
`to be filed under seal. The parties understand that the requested documents may be filed
`
`under seal only with the permission of the court after proper motion. If the motion is
`
`granted and the requesting party permitted to file the requested documents under seal, only
`
`counsel of record and unrepresented parties will have access to the sealed documents. Pro
`
`hac vice attorneys must obtain sealed documents from local counsel.
`
`8.
`
`Challenges to a Confidential Designation. The designation of any material
`
`or document as Confidential Information is subject to challenge by any party. Before filing
`
`any motion or objection to a confidential designation, the objecting party must meet and
`
`confer in good faith to resolve the objection informally without judicial intervention. A
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 7 of 13
`
`party that elects to challenge a confidentiality designation may file and serve a motion that
`
`identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. The
`
`burden of proving the necessity of a confidentiality designation remains with the party
`
`asserting confidentiality. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties must continue
`
`to treat the materials as Confidential Information under the terms of this Order.
`
`9.
`
`Use of Confidential Documents or Information at Trial or Hearing.
`
`Nothing in this Order will be construed to affect the use of any document, material, or
`
`information at any trial or hearing. A party that intends to present or that anticipates that
`
`another party may present Confidential Information at a hearing or trial must bring that
`
`issue to the attention of the court and the other parties without disclosing the Confidential
`
`Information. The court may thereafter make such orders as are necessary to govern the use
`
`of such documents or information at the hearing or trial.
`
`10. Obligations on Conclusion of Litigation.
`
`(a) Order Remains in Effect. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered, all
`
`provisions of this Order will remain in effect and continue to be binding after conclusion
`
`of the litigation.
`
`(b) Return of Confidential Documents. Within 30 days after this
`
`litigation concludes by settlement, final judgment, or final order, including all appeals, all
`
`documents designated as containing Confidential Information, including copies as defined
`
`above, must be returned to the party who previously produced the document unless: (1)
`
`the document has been offered into evidence or filed without restriction as to disclosure;
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 8 of 13
`
`(2) the parties agree to destruction of the document to the extent practicable in lieu of
`
`return;2 or (3) as to documents bearing the notations, summations, or other mental
`
`impressions of the receiving party, that party elects to destroy the documents and certifies
`
`to the producing party that it has done so.
`
`(c) Retention of Work Product. Notwithstanding
`
`the above
`
`requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work product,
`
`including an index which refers or relates to designated Confidential Information, so long
`
`as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text or images
`
`of designated documents. This work product will continue to be confidential under this
`
`Order. An attorney may use his or her own work product in subsequent litigation provided
`
`that its use does not disclose Confidential Information.
`
`11. Order Subject to Modification. This Order is subject to modification by
`
`the court on its own motion or on motion of any party or any other person with standing
`
`concerning the subject matter. The Order must not, however, be modified until the parties
`
`have been given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the proposed modification.
`
`12. No Prior Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the
`
`representations and agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery.
`
`
`2The parties may choose to agree that the receiving party must destroy documents containing
`Confidential Information and certify the fact of destruction, and that the receiving party must not
`be required to locate, isolate and return e-mails (including attachments to e-mails) that may include
`Confidential Information, or Confidential Information contained in deposition transcripts or drafts
`or final expert reports.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 9 of 13
`
`Nothing in this Order will be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any
`
`document or material designated as Confidential Information by counsel or the parties is
`
`entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) or otherwise until such time as the court
`
`may rule on a specific document or issue.
`
`13.
`
`Persons Bound by Protective Order. This Order will take effect when
`
`entered and is binding upon all counsel of record and their law firms, the parties, and
`
`persons made subject to this Order by its terms.
`
`14.
`
`Jurisdiction. The court’s jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Order
`
`will terminate on the final disposition of this case. But a party may file a motion to seek
`
`leave to reopen the case to enforce the provisions of this Order.
`
`15. Applicability to Parties Later Joined. If additional persons or entities
`
`become parties to this lawsuit, they must not be given access to any Confidential
`
`Information until they execute and file with the court their written agreement to be bound
`
`by the provisions of this Order.
`
`16.
`
`Protections Extended to Third-Party’s Confidential Information. The
`
`parties agree to extend the provisions of this Protective Order to Confidential Information
`
`produced in this case by third parties, if timely requested by the third party.
`
`17. Confidential Information Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced in Other
`
`Litigation. If a receiving party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other
`
`litigation that would compel disclosure of any material or document designated in this
`
`action as Confidential Information, the receiving party must so notify the designating party,
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 10 of 13
`
`in writing, immediately and in no event more than three business days after receiving the
`
`subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order.
`
`The receiving party also must immediately inform in writing the party who caused
`
`the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered
`
`by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Order. In addition, the receiving party must
`
`deliver a copy of this Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the
`
`subpoena to issue.
`
`The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested persons to the
`
`existence of this Order and to afford the designating party in this case an opportunity to try
`
`to protect its Confidential Information in the court from which the subpoena or order
`
`issued. The designating party bears the burden and the expense of seeking protection in
`
`that court of its Confidential Information, and nothing in these provisions should be
`
`construed as authorizing or encouraging a receiving party in this action to disobey a lawful
`
`directive from another court. The obligations set forth in this paragraph remain in effect
`
`while the party has in its possession, custody, or control Confidential Information
`
`designated by the other party to this case.
`
`18.
`
`Inadvertent Disclosure of Confidential Information Covered by
`
`Attorney-Client Privilege or Work Product. The inadvertent disclosure or production
`
`of any information or document that is subject to an objection on the basis of attorney-client
`
`privilege or work-product protection, including, but not limited, to information or
`
`documents that may be considered Confidential Information under the Protective Order,
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 11 of 13
`
`will not be deemed to waive a party’s claim to its privileged or protected nature or estop
`
`that party or the privilege holder from designating the information or document as
`
`attorney-client privileged or subject to the work product doctrine at a later date. Any party
`
`receiving any such information or document must return it upon request to the producing
`
`party. Upon receiving such a request as to specific information or documents, the receiving
`
`party must return the information or documents to the producing party within 30 days,
`
`regardless of whether the receiving party agrees with the claim of privilege and/or
`
`work-product protection. Disclosure of the information or document by the other party
`
`prior to such later designation will not be deemed a violation of the provisions of this Order.
`
`The provisions of this section constitute an order pursuant to Rules 502(d) and(e) of the
`
`Federal Rules of Evidence.
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 12 of 13
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: August 28, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WE SO MOVE
`and agree to abide by the
`terms of this Order
`
`
`
`
`s/ K. Gary Sebelius
`U.S. Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`WE SO MOVE
`and agree to abide by the
`terms of this Order
`
`/s/James R. Shetlar
`James R. Shetlar, Esq.
`LAW OFFICES OF JAMES R. SHETLAR, PA
`8000 Foster
`Overland Park, KS 66204-3699
`Phone: (913) 648-3220
`Fax: (913) 648-3357
`E-mail: james@shetlarlawfirm.com
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Marcos A. Barbosa
`Marcos A. Barbosa, Esq.
`KUTAK ROCK LLP
`2300 Main Street, Suite 800
`Kansas City, MO 64108
`Phone: (816) 960-0090
`Fax: (816) 960-0041
`E-mail: Marcos.barbosa@kutakrock.com
`
`and
`
`Benjamin M. Weston (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`LEDERER WESTON CRAIG PLC
`4401 Westown Parkway, Suite 212
`West Des Moines, IA 50266
`Phone: (515) 224-3911
`Fax: (515) 224-2698
`E-mail: bweston@lwclawyers.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:18-cv-02302-CM-KGS Document 13 Filed 08/28/18 Page 13 of 13
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`AND
`AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
`
`The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he/she has read the Protective Order
`
`dated _______________ in the case captioned, Stephanie Anthony v. Home Depot U.S.A.,
`
`Inc. and Home Depot Inc., and attached hereto, understands the terms thereof, and agrees
`
`to be bound by its terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States
`
`District Court for the District of Kansas in matters relating to this Protective Order and
`
`understands that the terms of the Protective Order obligate him/her to use materials
`
`designated as Confidential Information in accordance with the order solely for the purposes
`
`of the above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such Confidential Information to
`
`any other person, firm, or concern, except in accordance with the provisions of the
`
`Protective Order.
`
`The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Protective Order may result in
`
`penalties for contempt of court.
`
`Name:
`
`Job Title:
`
`Employer:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`
`______________________________________
`
`______________________________________
`
`Business Address:
`
`___________________________
`
`___________________________
`
`Date: _________________
`
`___________________________
`Signature
`
`13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket