`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
`
`Civil Case No. 1:19-CV-2521-SAG
`
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*
`*************
`
`ORDER
`
`
`JUDY JIEN, et al.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PERDUE FARMS, INC., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is this 16th day of
`
`September, 2020, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, ECF 341, 342, 343, 344, 349,
`
`350, 351, 353, are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motions are granted with respect
`
`to Count I of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, ECF 258, for all Defendants except Fieldale,
`
`Butterball, and WMS. The Motions are granted with respect to Count II of Plaintiffs’ Amended
`
`Complaint for all Defendants except Fieldale, Butterball, Peco Foods, Agri Stats, and WMS.
`
`Where dismissal is granted, the claims shall be dismissed without prejudice and Plaintiffs will be
`
`afforded thirty days in which to seek leave to file a second Amended Complaint.
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs are ordered to confer, by September 23, 2020, with counsel for the five remaining
`
`Defendants and advise if they intend to seek leave to file a second Amended Complaint, to avoid
`
`those Defendants filing an Answer to this Amended Complaint only to have to respond again to
`
`an amended version.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/
`
`
`Stephanie A. Gallagher
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
