`
`THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
`
`WORCESTER,ss.
`
`WORCESTER SUPERIOR COURT
`CIVIL ACTION NO.
`?
`
`eeaAaeaeaeeeeeaaaaa
`
`CATHY BUDRY,
`Plaintiff,
`
`Vv.
`
`KELLY ROBINSON, MD, REID
`MOTHA,PA, ELLEN M. RAY, MD,
`STACEY BRACKETT,RN, JESSICA
`BOUTELL, RN, HEYWOOD
`HEALTHCARE,INC., d/b/a
`HEYWOOD HOSPITAL,
`HEYWOOD MEDICAL GROUP,INC.,
`and HEYWOODPHYSICIAN HOSPITAL
`ORGANIZATION,INC.
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT &
`JURY DEMAND
`
`
`
`MAY 22 2023
`
`ATTEST Miwa
`
`J WWE. CLEA
`
`1. The plaintiff, Cathy Budry, is an individual residing in Worcester, Worcester County,
`
`PARTIES
`
`Massachusetts.
`
`2. At all times material hereto, the defendant, Heywood Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Heywood
`
`Hospital, was a Massachusetts corporation with a principal place of business located in
`
`Gardner, Worcester County, Massachusetts, which operated a hospital therein known as
`
`“Heywood Hospital”.
`
`3. Atall times material hereto, the defendant, Heywood Medical Group,Inc., was a
`
`Massachusetts corporation with a principal place of business located in Gardner,
`
`Worcester County, Massachusetts, that was owned by, controlled by, and/oraffiliated
`
`Page 1 of 23
`
`
`
`with, Heywood Hospital, and which provided medical services to patients, through its
`
`employees, contractors and/or agents, at Heywood Hospital.
`
`. Atall times material hereto, the defendant, Heywood Physician Hospital Organization,
`
`Inc., was a Massachusetts corporation with a principal place of business located in
`
`Gardner, Worcester County, Massachusetts, that was ownedby, controlled by, and/or
`
`affiliated with, Heywood Hospital, and which provided medical services to patients,
`
`through its employees, contractors and/or agents, at Heywood Hospital.
`
`. The defendant, Kelly Robinson, MD, maintains both a residence and a usual place of
`
`business in Gardner, Worcester County, Massachusetts, and was, at all times material
`
`hereto, a licensed physician holding himself out as a medical doctor specializing in
`
`internal medicine and emergency medicine, and an attending physician working at
`
`Heywood Hospital.
`
`. The defendant, Ellen M. Ray, MD, maintains a residence in Winchendon, Worcester
`
`County, Massachusetts, and a usual place of business in Gardner, Worcester County,
`
`Massachusetts, and was, at all times material hereto, a licensed physician holding herself
`
`out as a medical doctor specializing in internal medicine and emergency medicine, and
`
`Chief of Emergency Services at Heywood Hospital.
`
`. The defendant, Reid Motha, PA, maintains a residence in Gill, Franklin County,
`
`Massachusetts, and a usual place of business in Gardner, Worcester County,
`
`Massachusetts, and was, at all times material hereto, a certified physician’s assistant
`
`working in the Emergency Department at Heywood Hospital.
`
`Page 2 of 23
`
`
`
`The defendant, Stacey Brackett, RN, maintains a residence in Hubbardston, Worcester
`
`County, Massachusetts, and a usual place of business in Gardner, Worcester County,
`
`Massachusetts, and was,at all times material hereto, a registered nurse working in the
`
`Emergency Department at Heywood Hospital.
`
`The defendant, Jessica Boutell, RN, maintains both a residence and a usualplace of
`
`business in Gardner, Worcester County, Massachusetts and was, at all times material
`
`hereto, a registered nurse working in the Emergency Department at Heywood Hospital.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`10.
`
`On June 23, 2020, at or about 6:00 p.m., the plaintiff, Ms. Cathy Budry, presented at the
`
`Emergency Department at Heywood Hospital in Gardner, MA.
`
`11.
`
`Ms. Budry screened negative for Covid-19 and was admitted to the Emergency
`
`Department where the defendants, Ellen M. Ray, MD, Kelly Robinson, MD, Reid Motha,
`
`PA,Stacéy Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell, RN, participated in the evaluation, care
`
`and treatment of Ms. Budry.
`
`12.
`
`At the time of her presentation, Ms. Budry was suffering from multiple spinal epidural
`
`abscesses (“SEAs”), and was displaying signs and symptoms of SEA(s), a bacterial
`
`infection(s) in the spinal canal that can grow and expand quickly, causing neurological
`
`injury by:compressing the spinal cord.
`
`13.
`
`At the time of her presentation, Ms. Budry was known to the defendants to have a prior
`
`history of SEA(s), and to be an intravenous drug user (““IVDU”), and for these reasons to
`
`be at a higherrisk for SEA(s).
`
`Page 3 of 23
`
`
`
`14. In June of 2020, SEA was known to physicians and medical providers to be a rapidly
`
`progressive condition that constituted a medical emergency requiring prompt diagnosis
`
`and treatmentin order to prevent devastating neurological injury, permanentparalysis
`
`and/or death.
`
`15. In June of 2020, the earlier an SEA(s) could be diagnosed andtreated, via surgical
`
`intervention/decompression and antibiotics, the better the medical outcome for the
`
`patient, as such treatment would halt neurological injury and permit the patient to retain
`
`function.
`
`16. In June of 2020, the defendants were aware that an SEA(s) left undiagnosed and
`
`untreated until the onset of paralysis was morelikely to result in permanentparalysis
`
`and/orlimited restitution of function in the patient, even with surgical intervention.
`
`17. At the time of Ms. Budry’s presentation at Heywood Hospital, the medical standard(s) of
`
`care required an emergency and/orinternal medicine physician, physician’s assistant,
`
`and/or registered nurse, to recognize the signs and symptoms of SEA(s), and to suspect
`
`SEA(s) in patients presenting with Ms. Budry’s signs and symptomsand/or prior medical
`
`history.
`
`18. At the time of Ms. Budry’s presentation at Heywood, the applicable medical standard(s)
`
`of care required the average qualified emergency and/or internal medicine physician,
`
`Physician's assistant, and/or registered nurse, when presented with a patient with Ms.
`Budry’s signs and symptomsand/orpriorhistory, to suspect SEA(s) and to seek and/or
`
`order an emergent MRI, and/or admit the patient for observation until SEA(s) was ruled
`
`out or confirmed by MRI, and/or to order or request an infectious disease and/or
`
`Page 4 of 23
`
`
`
`neurological/neurosurgical consultation, which would likely similarly result in an MRI
`
`being ordered.
`
`19.
`
`Atthe time of Ms. Budry’s presentation, MRI wasthe standard ofcare for the diagnosis
`
`of SEA becauseit provided superior visualization, could detect SEA early in the course,
`
`and could distinguish SEA from other conditions.
`
`20.
`
`Notwithstanding Ms. Budry’s signs and symptoms, and/or her known medicalhistory,
`
`and notwithstanding the seriousness and emergent nature of SEA, and that time was of
`
`the essence, none of Ms. Budry’s providers at Heywood — including Ellen M. Ray, MD,
`
`Kelly Robinson, MD, Reid Motha, PA, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell, RN -
`
`recognized or appreciated Ms. Budry’s signs/symptoms of SEA(s), sought or ordered an
`
`MRI, admitted her inpatient for observation until SEA(s) wasruled out or confirmed by
`
`MRI, or ordered an infectious disease or neurological/neurosurgical consultation.
`
`21.
`
`Instead, a CT without contrast, ineffective for detecting SEA and below the standard of
`
`care, was ordered, and aboutthree (3) hourslater, after having reviewed “documentation
`
`ofthe patient’s history, exam findings, diagnostics, interventions and procedures” —
`including the radiologist’s report recommending MRI - Dr. Kelly Robinson discharged
`
`Ms.Budry to home with her symptoms“unchanged”, and with an incomplete or incorrect
`
`diagnosis of “cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy, unspecified cervical region”, and
`
`with no scheduled follow-up.
`
`22.
`
`Hercondition having not been properly diagnosedor treated, about forty-eight (48) hours
`
`later, on the evening of June 25, 2020, Ms. Budry presented again at the Emergency
`
`Department at Heywood Hospital, via ambulance, with signs and symptoms“similar” to
`
`Page 5 of 23
`
`
`
`those she presented with on June 23, 2020, and with the onset ofparalysis — she was
`
`evaluated: and treated by the defendant, Ellen M. Ray, MD.
`
`23.
`
`Dr. Ray diagnosed Ms. Budry with “cauda equina syndrome”and arranged for her
`
`immediate “epidural abscess” transfer to Baystate Medical Center that same night for a
`
`“higher level of care”, including neurological consultation and MRI.
`
`24.
`
`After arriving at Baystate Medical Center by ambulance at about midnight on June 26,
`
`2020, MRI(s) revealed the multiple SEA(s) in the plaintiffs cervical, thoracic and/or
`lumbar spine, and she underwentsurgical intervention and decompression —
`
`unfortunately, due to the missed, delayed and/or late diagnoses at Heywood Hospital,
`
`surgical intervention could not prevent respiratory failure and/or result in any material
`
`functional restitution for the plaintiff, and she was caused to be, and remainsto this day, a
`
`quadriplegic.
`
`25.
`
`Ever since June 25, 2020, and as a result ofher quadriplegia, Ms. Budry has required
`
`constant hospitalization(s) and medical monitoring, has suffered total physical disability
`
`and loss of mobility, and has further suffered, and remainsat risk for, additional
`
`complications and sequalae associated with her condition(s).
`
`26.
`
`Had the plaintiffs treatment providers at Heywood Hospital acted in accordance with the
`applicable medical standards of care on June 23, 2020,the plaintiff's SEA(s) would have
`been timely diagnosed and promptly treated prior to the onset ofparalysis and/or before the
`
`occurrenceofsignificant neurologicalinjury, and she would haveretaineda full or substantial
`
`level of function, and not have suffered the degree of neurological injury, respiratory
`
`paralysis, incontinence and permanent quadriplegia that she has.
`
`Page 6 of 23
`
`
`
`27. The requirements of G.L. c. 231,§ 60L, have been satisfied, by reason ofthe plaintiff
`
`serving a sufficient written “Notice of Intent to File Medical Malpractice Action(s)”
`
`uponthe parties-defendantin this case within the statutory timeframe, and/or by reason
`
`of the defendants informing plaintiffs counsel in writing that they do not intend tosettle
`
`the claim(s) within the applicable notice period, and/or becausetheplaintiff is exempt
`
`from said requirements pursuant to § 60L(j) as this lawsuit is being filed within six (6)
`
`monthsofthestatute oflimitations expiring as to any claimant, and/or by reason of other
`
`statutory and/or common-law exemption(s).
`
`COUNT 1 — MEDICAL NEGLIGENCEvs. KELLY ROBINSON, MD
`
`28. The plaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one (1) through twenty-
`
`seven (27) and, by this reference, incorporates the sameherein.
`
`29. At all times material hereto, and on June 23, 2020, a physician-patient relationship
`
`existed between the defendant, Kelly Robinson, MD,andthe plaintiff, Cathy Budry.
`
`30. Atall times material hereto, and on June 23, 2020, Kelly Robinson, MD, owed the
`
`plaintiff a duty to exercise the reasonable care and skill of the average qualified internist
`
`and/or emergency physician in accordance with the applicable medical standard(s) of
`
`care, which included recognizing and appreciating the plaintiff's prior history and signs
`
`and symptoms of SEA(s), suspecting SEA(s) on theplaintiffs hospital presentation,
`
`ordering an emergent MRI, admitting the plaintiff as an inpatient and observingher until
`
`SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI, and/or ordering an infectious disease
`
`and/or neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s) that would likely have resulted in an
`
`MRI beingordered.
`
`Page 7 of 23
`
`
`
`31.
`
`The defendant, Kelly Robinson, MD, breachedthis duty of care, and fell below the
`
`medical standard(s) ofcare, in failing to recognize and appreciate the plaintiff's prior
`
`history arid signs/symptoms of SEA(s), in failing to suspect SEA(s) on her hospital
`
`presentation,in failing to order an emergent MRI,in failing to admit the plaintiff as an
`
`inpatient and observe her until SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI,in failing
`
`to order an infectious disease and/or neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s), in
`
`discharging the plaintiff with an incomplete and/or incorrect diagnosis and with her
`
`symptoms unchanged, and in missing the SEA(s) diagnosis andfailing to treat her
`
`SEA(s) in any way.
`
`32.
`
`The missed diagnosis by, and negligent acts and omissions of, Kelly Robinson, MD,
`
`and/or his departures from the medical standards of care, were not (1) permitted by, or
`
`made pursuant to, an official state or federal Covid-19 emergency rule(s) that waived,
`
`suspended or modified the otherwise applicable standardsofcarerelating to the
`
`| plaintiffs treatment, or (ii) in fact caused or impacted by decisions made pursuant to such
`
`a rule(s), and/or treatment conditions resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak,or (iii) made
`
`in good faith consistent with the guidelines for crisis standards of care for the Covid-19
`
`pandemic issued by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (“DPH”), nor were
`
`suchcrisis standards of care formally activated with DPHat the time, and/or in force or
`
`triggered.
`
`33.
`
`Asa direct and proximate result of said acts and omissions of Kelly Robinson, MD,the
`
`plaintiffs SEAs remained undiagnosed and untreated fora critical period of time, and
`
`thereby were permitted to expand and causeirreversible spinal cord injury to the plaintiff,
`
`depriving her of a better medical outcome, causing her to suffer, and to continue to suffer
`
`Page 8 of 23
`
`
`
`from, pain, permanentparalysis, quadriplegia, mental anguish,disability, related
`
`complications and sequalae, and to incur, and to continue to incur, substantial medical
`
`expense(s).
`
`WHEREFORE,theplaintiff prays judgment against the defendant, Kelly Robinson, MD,
`
`for the above-described harms, with awards of damages, attorneys' fees, interest and
`
`costs.
`
`COUNT 2 — MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE vs. ELLEN M. RAY, MD
`
`34.
`
`The plaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one (1) through thirty-three
`
`(33) and, by this reference, incorporates the sameherein.
`
`35.
`
`Atall times material hereto, and on June 23, 2020, a physician-patient relationship
`
`existed between the defendant, Ellen M. Ray, MD,andthe plaintiff, Cathy Budry.
`
`36.
`
`At all times material hereto, and on June 23, 2020, Ellen M. Ray, MD, owedthe plaintiff
`
`a duty to exercise the reasonable care and skill of the average qualified internist and/or
`
`emergency physician in accordance with the applicable medical standard(s) ofcare,
`
`which included recognizing and appreciating the plaintiffs prior history and
`signs/symptoms of SEA(s), suspecting SEA(s) on the plaintiff’s hospital presentation,
`
`ordering an emergent MRI, admitting her as an inpatient and observing heruntil SEA(s)
`
`could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI,and/orordering an infectious disease and/or
`
`neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s) that would likely have resulted in an MRI
`
`being ordered.
`
`37.
`
`The defendant, Ellen M. Ray, MD, breached this duty of care, and fell below the medical
`
`standard(s) of care, in failing to recognize and appreciate the plaintiff's prior history and
`
`Page 9 of 23
`
`
`
`signs/symptoms of SEA(s),in failing to suspect SEA(s) on herhospital presentation, in
`
`failing to ‘order an emergent MRI, in failing to admit the plaintiff as an inpatient and
`
`observe her until SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI,in failing to order an
`
`infectious disease and/or neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s), in causing or
`
`permitting the plaintiff's discharge with an incomplete and/or incorrect diagnosis and
`
`with her symptoms unchanged, and in missing the SEA(s) diagnosis andfailing to treat
`
`the plaintiff's SEA(s) in any way.
`
`38.
`
`The missed diagnosis by, and negligent acts and omissionsof, Ellen M. Ray, MD,and/or
`
`her departures from the medical standards of care, were not (i) permitted by, or made
`
`pursuantto, an official state or federal Covid-19 emergency rule(s) that waived,
`
`suspended or modified the otherwise applicable standardsofcare relating to the
`
`plaintiffs treatment, or (ii) in fact caused or impacted by decisions made pursuant to such
`
`a rule(s), and/or treatment conditions resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak,or (111) made
`
`in good faith consistent with the guidelines for crisis standards of care for the Covid-19
`pandemic issued by DPH,nor were such crisis standards ofcare formally activated with
`
`DPHat the time and/orin force ortriggered.
`
`39.
`
`Asa direct and proximateresult of said acts and omissions of Ellen M. Ray, MD,the
`
`plaintiffs SEAs remained undiagnosed and untreated for a critical period of time, and
`
`thereby were permitted to expand andcauseirreversible spinal cord injury to the plaintiff,
`
`depriving her of a better medical outcome, causing her to suffer, and to continue to suffer
`
`from, pain, permanentparalysis, quadriplegia, mental anguish, disability, related
`complications and sequalae, and to incur, and to continue to incur, substantial medical
`
`expense(s).
`
`Page 10 of 23
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE,theplaintiff prays judgment against the defendant, Ellen M. Ray, MD,
`
`for the above-described harms, with awards of damages, attorneys' fees, interest and
`
`costs.
`
`COUNT 3 — MEDICAL NEGLIGENCEvs. REID MOTHA, PA
`
`40.
`
`Theplaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one(1) through thirty-nine
`
`(39) and, by this reference, incorporates the sameherein.
`
`41.
`
`At all times material hereto, and on June 23, 2020, a physician’s assistant-patient
`
`relationship existed between the defendant, Reid Motha, PA, and the plaintiff, Cathy
`
`Budry.
`
`42.
`
`Atall times material hereto, Reid Motha, PA, owedthe plaintiff a duty to exercise the
`
`reasonable care and skill of the average qualified physician’s assistant in accordance with
`
`the applicable medical standard(s) of care, which included recognizing and appreciating
`
`the plaintiff's prior medical history and signs/symptoms of SEA(s), and advisinghis
`
`supervising physician(s) thereof, as well as ordering, or advising his supervising
`
`physician(s) to order, an emergent MRI, admitting the plaintiff as an inpatient and
`
`observing her until SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI,and/oradvisinghis
`
`supervising physician(s) to do so, and/or ordering or requesting an infectious disease
`
`and/or neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s), and/or recommending the sameto his
`
`supervising physician(s).
`
`43.
`
`The defendant, Reid Motha, PA, breached this duty of care, and fell below the medical
`
`standard(s) ofcare, in failing to recognize and appreciate the plaintiff's prior history and
`
`signs/symptoms of SEA(s), andin failing to sufficiently advise his supervising
`
`Page 11 of 23
`
`
`
`physician(s) ofthe same, in failing to order an emergent MRI, and/or to advise his
`
`supervising physician(s) to do so, in failing to admit the plaintiff as an inpatient and
`
`observe her until SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI, and/or advising his
`
`supervising physician(s) to do the same,in failing to order or request an infectious
`
`disease and/or neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s), in causing and/or permitting
`
`the plaintiffto be discharged with an incomplete and/or incorrect diagnosis and with her
`
`symptoms unchanged, and in missing the SEA(s) diagnosis andfailing to treat the
`
`plaintiff's SEA(s) in any way.
`
`44.
`
`The missed diagnosis by, and negligent acts and omissions of, Reid Motha, PA, and/or
`
`his departures from the medical standards of care, were not (i) permitted by, or made
`
`pursuant to, an official state or federal Covid-19 emergency rule(s) that waived,
`
`suspended or modified the otherwise applicable standardsof care relating to the
`
`plaintiff's treatment, or(ii) in fact caused or impacted by decisions made pursuant to such
`
`a rule(s), and/or treatment conditions resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak, or (iii) made
`
`in good faith consistent with the guidelines for crisis standards of care for the Covid-19
`
`pandemic issued by DPH,nor were suchcrisis standards of care formally activated with
`
`DPHatthe time and/orin force ortriggered.
`
`45.
`
`Asa direct and proximate result of said acts and omissions of Reid Motha, PA,the
`plaintiff5 SEAsremained undiagnosed and untreated for a critical period oftime, and
`
`thereby were permitted to expand and causeirreversible spinal cord injury to the plaintiff,
`
`depriving her of a better medical outcome,causing herto suffer, and to continueto suffer
`
`from, pain, permanentparalysis, quadriplegia, mental anguish,disability, related
`
`Page 12 of 23
`
`
`
`complications and sequalae, and to incur, and to continue to incur, substantial medical
`
`expense(s).
`
`WHEREFORE,the plaintiff prays judgment against the defendant, Reid Motha, PA, for
`
`the above-described harms, with awards of damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and costs.
`
`COUNT 4-— NEGLIGENCEvs.
`STACEY BRACKETT, RN & JESSICA BOUTELL, RN
`
`46.
`
`Theplaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one (1) through forty-five
`
`(45) and, by this reference, incorporates the same herein.
`
`47.
`
`Atall times material hereto, and on June 23, 2020, a nurse-patient relationship existed
`
`betweentheplaintiff, Cathy Budry, and the defendants, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica
`
`Boutell, RN.
`
`48.
`
`Atall times material hereto, the defendants, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell,
`
`RN,were assignedto care for the plaintiff and owed her a duty to exercise the reasonable
`
`care and skill of the average qualified registered nurse(s) in accordance with the
`
`applicable medical standard(s) of care and good nursingpractices, which included
`
`recognizing, appreciating and documentingthe plaintiffs prior medical history and
`
`signs/symptoms of SEA(s) on her hospital presentation, and properly advising the
`
`attending physicians andassistants thereof, as well as advising the physicians and/or
`
`assistants of the need to order an MRI and/or admitthe plaintiff until SEA(s) could be
`
`ruled out or confirmed by MRI,and/or of the need for ordering or requesting an
`
`infectious disease and/or neurological/neurosurgical consultation(s), and/or to repeat vital
`
`signs, make and properly documentfurther observationsofthe plaintiff's signs/symptoms
`
`Page 13 of 23
`
`
`
`of SEA(s), and otherwise elevate concerns of symptoms/signs of SEA(s) and suspicion
`
`for SEA(s) to the attention of other providers at the hospital.
`
`49.
`
`The defendants, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell, RN, breached this duty of care,
`
`and fell below the medical standard(s) ofcare, in failing to recognize, appreciate and
`
`documenttheplaintiffs prior history and signs/symptoms of SEA(s), andin failing to
`
`sufficiently advise the plaintiff's physician(s) and physicians’ assistant(s) of the same,in
`
`failing to advise the plaintiff's physician(s) and assistants to admit the plaintiff as an
`
`inpatient and observeher until SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by MRI, in failing
`
`to advise them to request an infectious disease and/or neurological/neurosurgical
`
`consultation(s), in failing to repeat vital signs and properly obtain and documentfurther
`
`observationsof the plaintiff's signs/symptoms of SEA(s),in failing to sufficiently elevate
`
`concerns of symptoms/signs of SEA(s) to the attention of other providers, in causing
`
`and/or permitting the plaintiff to be discharged from the hospital with an incomplete
`
`and/or incorrect diagnosis and with her symptoms unchanged, and in missing the SEA(s)
`
`diagnosis andfailing to treat the plaintiff's SEA(s) in any way.
`
`50
`
`. The negligent acts and omissions of the defendants, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica
`
`Boutell, RN, and/or their departures from the medical standards of care, were not (1)
`
`permitted by, or made pursuantto, an official state or federal Covid-19 emergencyrule(s)
`
`that waived, suspended or modified the otherwise applicable standardsofcare relating to
`
`the plaintiff's treatment, or (ii) in fact caused or impacted by decisions made pursuant to
`
`such a rule(s), and/or treatment conditions resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak,or(iii)
`
`made in goodfaith consistent with the guidelines for crisis standards of care for the
`
`Page 14 of 23
`
`
`
`Covid-19 pandemic issued by DPH,nor were suchcrisis standards of care formally
`
`activated|with DPH atthe time and/orin forceortriggered.
`
`51.
`
`Asa direct and proximate result of said acts and omissions of Stacey Brackett, RN, and
`
`Jessica Boutell, RN,the plaintiff's SEAs remained undiagnosed and untreated for a
`
`critical period oftime, and thereby were permitted to expand and causeirreversible spinal
`
`cord. injury to the plaintiff, depriving her of a better medical outcome, causing herto
`suffer, and to continue to suffer from, pain, permanent paralysis, quadriplegia, mental
`anguish, disability, related complications and sequalae, and to incur, and to continue to
`
`incur, substantial medical expense(s).
`
`WHEREFORE, the plaintiffprays judgment against the defendants, Stacey Brackett, RN,
`and Jessica Boutell, RN, for the above-described harms, with awards of damages,
`
`attorneys! fees, interest and costs.
`
`COUNT 5— NEGLIGENT SUPERVISIONvs.
`KELLY ROBINSON, MD & ELLEN M. RAY, MD
`
`52.
`
`Theplaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one(1) throughfifty-one
`
`(51) and, by this reference, incorporates the same herein.
`
`53.
`
`Atall timies material hereto, the defendants, Kelly Robinson, MD,and/or Ellen Ray, MD,
`owed a duty to the plaintiff, and were obliged by law and the applicable medical
`standards ofcare, to properly supervise Reid Motha, PA, and/or the other medicalstaffat
`Heywood Hospital whoparticipated in the evaluation, care and treatment ofthe plaintiff,
`in order to ensure that they provided medical servicesto the plaintiffin accordance with
`
`accepted medical standardsofcare.
`
`Page 15 of 23
`
`
`
`54.
`
`The defendants, Kelly Robinson, MD,and/or Ellen Ray, MD,each individually and/or in
`
`combination, acted negligently in failing to properly supervise and/or monitor Reid
`
`Motha, PA, and/or other medical staff at Heywood Hospital under their supervision,
`
`direction and/or control, to ensure that the medical treatment ofthe plaintiff was in
`
`accordance with accepted medical standards ofcare, causing the plaintiff's SEA(s) to
`
`remain undiagnosed and untreated, and the plaintiff to suffer harm.
`
`55.
`
`The failuie to properly supervise Reid Motha, PA, and/or other medical staff, and/or to
`
`prevent their respective departures from the medical standardsofcare, as before-
`
`mentionedherein, were not (1) permitted by, or made pursuant to, an official state or
`
`federal Covid-19 emergency rule(s) that waived, suspended or modified the otherwise
`
`applicable standards ofcare relating to the plaintiffs treatment, or (ii) in fact caused or
`
`impacted by decisions made pursuant to such a rule(s), and/or treatment conditions
`
`resulting from the Covid-19 outbreak, or (iii) made in good faith consistent with the
`
`guidelines for crisis standards of care for the Covid-19 pandemic issued by DPH,nor
`
`were suchcrisis standards of care formally activated with DPHat the time and/orin force
`
`or triggered.
`
`56.
`
`Asa direct and proximateresult of said negligent acts and omissions of Kelly Robinson,
`
`MD, and/or Ellen M. Ray, MD,in failing to properly supervise Reid Motha, PA, and/or
`
`other medical staff at Heywood Hospital, the plaintiff's SEAs remained undiagnosed and
`
`untreated for a critical period of time, and thereby were permitted to expand and cause
`
`irreversible spinal cord injury to the plaintiff, depriving her of a better medical outcome,
`
`causing her to suffer, and to continue to suffer from, pain, permanentparalysis,
`
`Page 16of 23
`
`
`
`quadriplegia, mental anguish,disability, related complications and sequalae, and to incur,
`
`and to continue to incur, substantial medical expense(s).
`
`WHEREFORE,theplaintiff prays judgment against the defendants, Kelly Robinson,
`
`MD,and Ellen M. Ray, MD for the above-described harms, with awards of damages,
`
`attorneys' fees, interest and costs.
`
`COUNT 6 — GROSS NEGLIGENCEvs. KELLY ROBINSON, MD, ELLEN M. RAY,
`MD, REID MOTHA, PA, STACEY BRACKETT, RN, & JESSICA BOUTELL, RN
`
`37.
`
`Theplaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one(1) through fifty-six (56)
`
`and, by this reference, incorporates the same herein.
`
`58.
`
`The before-mentioned negligent acts, omissions and departures from the applicable
`
`medical standards of care by the defendants Kelly Robinson, MD, Ellen M. Ray, MD,
`
`Reid Motha, PA, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell, RN, were especially
`
`egregious and substantially higher in magnitude than ordinary negligence, amounting to
`
`gross negligence, in that these providers simply ignored and/or were inattentive to the
`
`plaintiff's known risks factors for, and obvious indications of, SEA(s), a condition then
`well-known in the medical community to be very serious, and one wherethefailure to
`
`timely diagnose and treat would lead to serious catastrophic injury, permanentparalysis
`
`and/or death.
`
`59.
`
`At all times material hereto, it was highly foreseeable that the before-mentioned failure(s)
`
`of the defendants Kelly Robinson, MD, Ellen M. Ray, MD, Reid Motha, PA, Stacey
`
`Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell, RN, to act in accordance with the applicable medical
`
`standard(s) of care, were likely to create an unreasonablerisk of harm to theplaintiff and
`
`result in serious catastrophic injury to her, and thereby amounted to gross negligence.
`
`Page 17 of 23
`
`
`
`60. As a direct and proximate result of the gross negligence of these defendants, the
`
`plaintiff's SEAs remained undiagnosed and untreatedfora critical period of time, and
`
`thereby were permitted to expand and causeirreversible spinal cord injury to the plaintiff,
`
`depriving her of a better medical outcome, causing her to suffer, and to continue to suffer
`
`from, pain, permanentparalysis, quadriplegia, mental anguish, disability, related
`
`complications and sequalae, and to incur, and to continue to incur, substantial medical
`
`expense(s).
`
`WHEREFORE,theplaintiff prays judgment against the defendants, Kelly Robinson,
`
`MD,Ellen M. Ray, MD, Reid Motha, PA, Stacey Brackett, RN, and Jessica Boutell, RN,
`
`for the above-described harms, with awards of damages, attorneys’ fees, interest and
`
`costs.
`
`COUNT 7 — VICARIOUSLIABILITYvs.
`KELLY ROBINSON, MD & ELLEN RAY, MD
`
`61.
`
`Theplaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one (1) through sixty (60)
`
`and, by this reference, incorporates the same herein.
`
`62.
`
`Atall times material hereto, the defendants, Kelly Robinson, MD, and/or Ellen Ray, MD,
`
`directed and controlled the activities of Reid Motha, PA, who acted as the former’s agent
`
`and/or apparent/ostensible agent, in the care and treatmentofthe plaintiff.
`
`63
`
`. The defendants, Kelly Robinson, MD, and/or Ellen Ray, MD, by and through their agent,
`
`and/or apparent/ostensible agent, Reid Motha, PA, acted negligently and/or grossly
`
`negligent in providing treatmentto theplaintiff that fell below the medical standard(s) of
`
`care, in failing to recognize and appreciate the plaintiff's medical history and
`
`Page 18 of 23
`
`
`
`signs/symptoms of SEA(s), in failing to order an emergent MRI,in failing to admit the
`
`plaintiff as an inpatient and observe her until SEA(s) could be ruled out or confirmed by
`
`MRI, in failing to order an infectious disease and/or neurological/neurosurgical
`
`consultation(s), in discharging the plaintiff with an incomplete and/or incorrect diagnosis
`
`and with her symptoms unchanged,and in missing the SEA diagnosis andfailing to treat
`
`the plaintiff's SEA(s) in any way.
`
`64.
`
`Asa direct and proximate result of said acts and omissions of Kelly Robinson, MD,
`
`and/or Ellen Ray, MD,through their agent and/or apparent/ostensible agent, Reid Motha,
`
`PA,the plaintiff's SEAs remained undiagnosed and untreatedfora critical period of time,
`
`and thereby were permitted to expand and causeirreversible spinal cord injury to the
`
`plaintiff, depriving her of a better medical outcome, causing her to suffer, and to continue
`
`to suffer from, pain, permanentparalysis, quadriplegia, mental anguish, disability, related
`
`complications and sequalae, and to incur, and to continue to incur, substantial medical
`
`expense(s):
`
`WHEREFORE,theplaintiff prays judgment against the defendants, Kelly Robinson,
`
`MD,and Ellen M. Ray, MD,for the above-described harms, with awards of damages,
`
`attorneys’ fees, interest and costs.
`
`COUNT 8 - VICARIOUS LIABILITY vs. HEYWOOD DEFENDANTS
`
`65.
`
`Theplaintiff repeats the allegations contained in paragraphs one (1) through sixty-four
`
`(64) and, by this reference, incorporates the sameherein.
`
`66.
`
`Atall times material hereto, Heywood Healthcare, Inc., d/b/a Heywood Hospital,
`
`Heywood Medical Group,Inc., and Heywood Physician Hospital Organization, Inc.,
`
`Page 19 of 23
`
`
`
`(hereinafter the “Heywood Defendants”), each individually, and/or in combination,
`
`engagedin, and held themselves out as, providing hospital facilities and/or
`
`medical services to patients at Heywood Hospital, many of whom,includingth