`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT COURT OF MINNESOTA
`
`
`
`
`IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
`
`
`This Document Relates To:
`
`THE DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF
`ACTION
`
`
`
`Case No. 0:18-cv-01776 (JRT-HB)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
`APPROVAL OF THE CLASS
`ACTION SETTLEMENT
`BETWEEN DIRECT PURCHASER
`PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT
`JBS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`945578.1
`
`
`
`CASE 0:18-cv-01776-JRT-HB Doc. 549 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`This Court, having reviewed the Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action
`
`Settlement Between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and JBS (“Motion”), its accompanying
`
`memorandum and the exhibits thereto, the Settlement Agreement,1 and the file, hereby
`
`ORDERS AND ADJUDGES:
`
`Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement and Certification of Settlement Class
`
`1.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action and each of the parties to the
`
`Settlement Agreement. Upon review of the record, the Court finds that the proposed Settlement
`
`Agreement, which was arrived at by arm’s length negotiations by highly experienced counsel
`
`with the assistance of an experienced and nationally renowned mediator, falls within the range
`
`of possible approval and is hereby preliminarily approved, subject to further consideration at
`
`the Court’s Fairness Hearing. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is preliminarily
`
`determined to be fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Class,
`
`raises no obvious reasons to doubt its fairness, and raises a reasonable basis for presuming that
`
`the Settlement Agreement and its terms satisfy the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure 23(c)(2) and 23(e) and due process so that notice of the Settlement should be given
`
`to the Settlement Class.
`
`2.
`
`This Court certifies a Settlement Class defined as:
`
`All persons who purchased Pork directly from any of the
`Defendants or any co(cid:173)conspirator, or their respective subsidiaries
`or affiliates for use or delivery in the United States from at least as
`early as January 1, 2009 until the date of this order granting
`Preliminary Approval of the Settlement Agreement. Specifically
`excluded from the Settlement Class are the Defendants; the
`officers, directors or employees of any Defendant; any entity in
`
`
`1 Unless otherwise noted, all capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as in the
`Settlement Agreement between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and JBS (also referred to herein as
`“Settlement”).
`945578.1
`
`
`
`CASE 0:18-cv-01776-JRT-HB Doc. 549 Filed 12/01/20 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`which any Defendant has a controlling interest; and any affiliate,
`legal representative, heir or assign of any Defendant. Also
`excluded from this Settlement Class are any federal, state, or local
`governmental entities, any judicial officer presiding over this
`action and the members of his/her immediate family and judicial
`staff, and any juror assigned to this action.
`
`3.
`
`The Court appoints the law firms of Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., and
`
`Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP as Co-Lead Counsel for the Settlement Class.
`
`Approval of the Notice Plan
`
`4.
`
`The Court hereby directs notice to be distributed to the Settlement Class
`
`members pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 23(c)(2).
`
`5.
`
`The proposed notice plan set forth in the Motion and the supporting declarations
`
`comply with Rule 23(c)(2)(B) and due process as it constitutes the best notice that is
`
`practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice via mail and email to all
`
`members who can be identified through reasonable effort. The direct mail and email notice
`
`will be supported by reasonable publication notice to reach potential members of the
`
`Settlement Class who could not be individually identified.
`
`6.
`
`The attached proposed notice documents: Long Form Notice (Exhibit A), Email
`
`Notice (Exhibit B), and Summary Publication Notice (Exhibit C), and their manner of
`
`transmission, comply with Rule 23(c)(2)(B) and due process because the notices and forms
`
`are reasonably calculated to adequately apprise Settlement Class of (i) the nature of the action;
`
`(ii) the definition of the class certified; (iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses; (iv) that a
`
`Settlement Class member may enter an appearance through an attorney if the member so
`
`desires; (v) that the court will exclude from the Settlement Class any member who requests
`
`exclusion; (vi) the time and manner for requesting exclusion; and (vii) the binding effect of a
`
`945578.1
`
`
`
`CASE 0:18-cv-01776-JRT-HB Doc. 549 Filed 12/01/20 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`class judgment on members of the class under Rule 23(c)(3). Non-substantive changes, such
`
`as typographical errors, can be made to the notice documents by agreement of the parties
`
`without leave of the Court.
`
`7.
`
`So that the proposed notice plan may be carried out, each Defendant in this
`
`Action is directed to provide a customer list to the Settlement Administrator, including any
`
`reasonably available names, email addresses, and mailing addresses, pursuant to the schedule
`
`below.
`
`Schedule for Class Notice and the Fairness Hearing
`
`8.
`
`The Court hereby sets the below schedule for the dissemination of notice to
`
`potential members of the Settlement Class, for members of the Settlement Class to object to
`
`or exclude themselves from the Settlement Agreement, and for the Court’s Fairness Hearing,
`
`at which time the Court will determine whether the Settlement Agreement should be finally
`
`approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate. This Court may order the Fairness Hearing to be
`
`postponed, adjourned, or continued. If that occurs, the updated hearing date shall be posted on
`
`the Settlement Website, but other than the website posting the Parties will not be required to
`
`provide any additional notice to Settlement Class members. Pursuant to any applicable orders
`
`relating to the COVID-19 emergency or otherwise, the Fairness Hearing may take place
`
`remotely, including via telephone or video conference.
`
`DATE
`_____________ (45 days after the
`issuance of this Order)
`
`
`_____________ (75 days after the
`
`issuance of this Order)
`
`
`945578.1
`
`\
`
`EVENT
`Each Defendant to provide a customer list
`to the Settlement Administrator including
`\
`any reasonably available names, email
`addresses, and mailing addresses
`Settlement Administrator to provide direct
`
`mail and email notice, and commence
`implementation of the publication notice
`plan
`
`
`
`
`CASE 0:18-cv-01776-JRT-HB Doc. 549 Filed 12/01/20 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`EVENT
`Last day for Settlement Class members to
`request exclusion from the Settlement
`\
`Class; for Settlement Class members to
`object to the Settlement; and for Settlement
`Class members to file notices to appear at
`
`the Final Fairness Hearing
`Co-Lead Counsel to provide JBS with a list
`of all persons and entities who have timely
`
`and adequately requested exclusion from
`the Settlement Class
`Co-Lead Counsel shall file a motion for
`final approval of the Settlement and all
`supporting papers, and Co-Lead Counsel
`and JBS may respond to any objections to
`the proposed Settlement
`Final Fairness Hearing
`
`DATE
`_____________ (60 days after the
`commencement of Notice)
`
`
`
`_____________ (7 days after last day to
`request exclusion from the Settlements)
`
`
`_____________ (14 days before Final
`\
`Settlement Fairness Hearing)
`
`
`
`_____________ at ____ a.m. (at least 40
`days after last day to request exclusion
`from the Settlement)
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`DATED:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HON. JOHN R. TUNHEIM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`945578.1
`
`