throbber
Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 53 PageID: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. ____________
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`ZIPIT WIRELESS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff, Zipit Wireless, Inc., for its Complaint against Defendant LG Electronics U.S.A.,
`
`Inc., alleges as follows:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code.
`
`
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff, Zipit Wireless, Inc. (hereinafter “Zipit”) is a Delaware Corporation with a
`
`principal place of business located at 101 North Main Street, Suite 201, Greenville, South Carolina
`
`29601.
`
`3.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. (“LGEUS”) is a
`
`Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business at 910 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood
`
`Cliffs, New Jersey, 07632.
`
` 1
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 2 of 53 PageID: 2
`
`4.
`
`On July 23, 2018, Zipit sued LGEUS’s parent company, LG Electronics, Inc.
`
`(“LGEKR”), in the District of South Carolina for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,292,870 and
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,894,837. LGEKR moved to dismiss Zipit’s complaint for lack of personal
`
`jurisdiction or, alternatively, to transfer the case to the Northern District of California (despite
`
`having no offices there). The South Carolina court denied LGEKR’s motions without prejudice,
`
`granting LGEKR leave to refile its motion after the parties conducted jurisdictional discovery.
`
`In its reply brief in support of its motion, LGEKR stated that LGEUS is the “true defendant in
`
`this case,” and that New Jersey is a proper venue given that LGEUS is headquartered in this
`
`District. Zipit Wireless, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., No. 6:18-cv-02016-JMC (D.S.C.), Dkt. 46
`
`at 8 n.4.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`5.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over all causes of action set forth herein
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code, including 35 U.S.C. §271 et seq.
`
`6.
`
`LGEUS is in the business of supplying instant messaging devices, such as
`
`smartphones, in the United States.
`
`7.
`
`LGEUS has solicited business in the State of New Jersey, transacted business
`
`within the State of New Jersey and attempted to derive financial benefit from residents of the
`
`State of New Jersey, including benefits directly related to the instant patent infringement cause
`
`of action set forth herein.
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 3 of 53 PageID: 3
`
`8.
`
`LGEUS has made, used, sold, offered for sale, and/or imported mobile phones
`
`and/or has placed such phones into the stream of commerce, which phones have been offered for
`
`sale, sold, and/or used in the State of New Jersey and this judicial district.
`
`9.
`
`At the time of filing of this Complaint, LGEUS’s smartphones are available for
`
`purchase by consumers in the State of New Jersey, including within this judicial district.
`
`10.
`
`On information and belief, LGEUS has made, used, sold, offered for sale, and/or
`
`imported wireless mobile communication devices that are alleged herein to infringe one or more
`
`of the patents set forth herein, and/or has placed such devices into the stream of commerce,
`
`which devices have been made, offered for sale, sold, and/or used in the State of New Jersey and
`
`within this judicial district.
`
`11.
`
`LGEUS sells products in this judicial district that are accused of infringement in
`
`this Complaint.
`
`12.
`
`LGEUS is subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of New Jersey and in this
`
`judicial district.
`
`13.
`
`LGEUS is subject to personal jurisdiction in the State of New Jersey by virtue of
`
`the fact that its headquarters and its principal place of business are located in the State of New
`
`Jersey. LGEUS is also subject to personal jurisdiction under the provisions of the New Jersey
`
`Long Arm Statute by virtue of the fact that, upon information and belief, LGEUS has availed
`
`itself of the privilege of conducting and soliciting business within this State, including engaging
`
`in at least some of the infringing activities in this State, as well as by others acting as LGEUS’s
`
`agents and/or representatives, such that it would be reasonable for this Court to exercise
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 4 of 53 PageID: 4
`
`jurisdiction consistent with principles underlying the U.S. Constitution, and the exercise of
`
`jurisdiction by this Court would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, LGEUS has also established minimum contacts with
`
`this judicial district and regularly transacts and does business within this district, including
`
`advertising, promoting and selling products over the Internet, through intermediaries,
`
`representatives and/or agents located within this judicial district, that infringe Plaintiff Zipit’s
`
`patents, which products are then sold and/or shipped directly to citizens residing within this State
`
`and in this judicial district. Upon further information and belief, LGEUS has purposefully
`
`directed activities at citizens of this State including those located within this judicial district.
`
`15.
`
`On information and belief, LGEUS has purposefully and voluntarily placed its
`
`products into the stream of commerce with the expectation that they will be purchased and used
`
`by customers located in the State of New Jersey. On information and belief, LGEUS’s
`
`customers in the State of New Jersey have purchased and used and continue to purchase and use
`
`LGEUS’s products.
`
`16.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant under the long arm statute of the
`
`State of New Jersey because: (i) Defendant has and continues to intentionally sell products and
`
`methods, including the infringing methods, to customers in New Jersey; (ii) Defendant has and
`
`continues to intentionally instruct customers and potential customers in New Jersey with respect to
`
`how to use the products and methods that Defendant sells to customers in New Jersey; (iii)
`
`Defendant knows and has known its products and methods, including the infringing methods, have
`
`and continue to be sold and marketed in New Jersey; (iv) Defendant knows and has known that its
`
`manufactured products and methods will enter the United States of America and the State of New
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 5 of 53 PageID: 5
`
`Jersey; (v) Defendant has and continues to target customers and potential customers in New Jersey
`
`to buy and/or use Defendant’s products and methods, including the infringing methods; (vi)
`
`Defendant has and continues to provide advice to customers in New Jersey; (vii) it has been and
`
`continues to be foreseeable that Defendant’s products and methods, including the infringing
`
`methods, would enter the State New Jersey; (viii) Defendant has and continues to market to citizens
`
`of New Jersey through its website www.lg.com/us, which is copyrighted 2009-2020 by LG
`
`Electronics; (ix) Defendant has and continues to provide services to citizens of New Jersey through
`
`its through website; (x) Defendant derives substantial revenue from New Jersey; (xi) New Jersey
`
`has and continues to be part of Defendant’s established distribution channels; (xii) the assertion of
`
`personal jurisdiction over Defendant is reasonable and fair; (xiii) and the State of New Jersey has an
`
`interest in this matter due to the presence of Defendant’s products and methods, including the
`
`infringing methods, in the State of New Jersey.
`
`17.
`
`This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Defendant as: (i) Defendant maintains
`
`a regular and established place of business, its headquarters, in the State of New Jersey; (ii)
`
`Defendant transacts business in the State of New Jersey; (iii) Defendant maintains regular and
`
`systematic business contacts with the State of New Jersey and within this judicial district and
`
`division; (iv) Defendant purposely, regularly, and continuously conducts business in the State of
`
`New Jersey and within this judicial district and division; (v) Defendant knowingly places its
`
`infringing products in the stream of commerce knowing, expecting, and intending for its infringing
`
`products to be offered for sale, sold, purchased, and used by residents of State of New Jersey and
`
`within this judicial district and division; (vi) Defendant knowingly places its infringing products in
`
`the stream of commerce knowing, expecting, and intending for materials supporting it infringing
`
` 5
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 6 of 53 PageID: 6
`
`products, such as user manuals and product support literature, to be offered for sale, sold, purchased,
`
`and used by residents of State of New Jersey and within this judicial district and division; (vii)
`
`Defendant purposefully directs its activities at residents of the State of New Jersey; (viii) the cause
`
`of action set forth herein arises out of or relates to the Defendant’s activities in the State of New
`
`Jersey; and (ix) the exercise of jurisdiction over Defendant will not offend the traditional notions of
`
`fair play and substantial justice.
`
`18.
`
`Venue is proper in this judicial district and division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331,
`
`§1338(a), and §1400(b) at least because Defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a
`
`regular and established place of business in the District of New Jersey.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Zipit’s Technology
`
`19.
`
`Zipit has and continues to offer for sale Wi-Fi based instant messaging solutions.
`
`Zipit’s first product, the Zipit Wireless Messenger:
`
`
`
` 6
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 7 of 53 PageID: 7
`
`was introduced in 2004 and was sold through major retailers including Target, Best Buy, Radio
`
`Shack, and Amazon and received press coverage in the Chicago Tribune, the New York Times,
`
`and many media outlets, as shown in Exhibit “G.”
`
`20.
`
`In 2007, Zipit introduced its second-generation Wi-Fi based instant messaging
`
`device known as “Z2”:
`
`
`
`21.
`
`In 2011, Zipit launched an enterprise messaging solution in conjunction with a
`
`major U.S. cellular carrier and is actively selling this solution into healthcare, hospitality, ems,
`
`manufacturing, utility, and government accounts. Zipit’s solution has been deployed in over 250
`
`enterprise customers across the U.S. and Zipit’s customer base continues to grow monthly.
`
`Zipit’s Awards And Notoriety
`
`22.
`
`In 2005, Time Magazine awarded Zipit’s first Wi-Fi instant messaging device
`
`(“Zippy”) Time’s “The Most Amazing Inventions of 2005” Award:
`
` 7
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 8 of 53 PageID: 8
`
`
`
`To determine the award winners, Time Magazine “spent more than six months surveying fields
`
`as diverse as electronics, aeronautics, medical technology, sports equipment, toys, clothing and
`
`food looking for the newest-and most inspired-ideas of the year.” Exhibit “G.”
`
`23.
`
`Zipit’s “Zippy” instant messaging device also won an award from iParenting
`
`Media in 2006. Exhibit “G.”
`
`24.
`
`Zipit’s “Zippy” Wi-Fi instant messaging device also received praise and acclaim
`
`in media across the United States and the World in at least the Chicago Tribune “Zipit is king of
`
`messengers” (March 3, 2005); the New York Times “Making an Easy Task, Instant Messaging,
`
`Even Easier.” (March 10, 2005); the New York Times “Making an Easy Task, Instant
`
`Messaging, Even Easier.” (March 21, 2005) (Online Edition); the Austin American-Statesman
`
`“Gadgets: … Instant messaging with no extra charges” (March 21, 2005); ABC12.com “Zipit
`
`Wireless Messenger” (Aug. 15, 2005); ABC12.com “Zipit Wireless Messenger” (Aug. 22,
`
`2005); The Greenville News (Dec. 5, 2004); Parade “a brilliant little device” (April 24, 2005);
`
` 8
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 9 of 53 PageID: 9
`
`Univision.com; ym.com “What’s Hot: March 15, 2005” (March 17, 2005); Gizmodo “Perfect for
`
`the IM addict” (July 19, 2005); Gizmodo “Teacher’s Worst Nightmare - Aeronix ZipIt” (Sept.
`
`29, 2005); HeraldToday.com (“Zipit rules wireless messenging world”) (March 10, 2005); HUB:
`
`Digital Living (March 2005); New York Daily News “Hot, hotter, hottest The Definitive guide to
`
`who and what is sexy right now” “Gadgets” (April 3, 2005); and the St. Petersburg Times “2005
`
`Annual Gadget Guide From Apple to Zipit” “For the good times” (Nov. 28, 2005). Exhibit “G.”
`
`25.
`
`Zipit’s second version of its Wi-Fi instant messaging device, “Z2,” also was
`
`widely praised and acclaimed. In 2007, PC Magazine awarded Zipit’s “Z2” the “Winner” of its
`
`“Best of Show” award at the Digital Life show in the category of “Portable Gear.” Zipit’s “Z2”
`
`also won another award from iParenting Media in 2008. Exhibit “G.”
`
`26.
`
`Zipit’s “Z2” Wi-Fi instant messaging device, also was praised in at least the
`
`following media sources: PC Magazine DigitalLife 2007 “Best of Show” (Sept. 28, 2007);
`
`DigitalLife’s “Best of Show Award” (Oct. 2, 2007); 2013 iParenting Media Awards – Winner –
`
`Zipit Wireless Messenger 2 (April 30, 2008); 2014, Video – Z2 Highlight Reel (The Today
`
`Show; USA Today; Associated Press Article; The Washington Post; The Boston Globe; Houston
`
`Chronicle; The Philadelphia Inquirer; The Kansas City Star; The Miami Herald; San Francisco
`
`Chronicle; Orlando Sentinel; Rocky Mountain News; ABC Television Channel 7; CNN
`
`Television; FOX News FOX & Friends; The New York Times; Pittsburgh Post-Gazette; MTV
`
`Television; Yahoo! Tech; CNET; eva; The Montel Williams Television Show; NBC Channel 5;
`
`LINUX Journal; WNN Wi-Fi News; Digital Tech News’; Wireless Week; electronista; I40
`
`News; Best stuff; FOX & Friends (2015); The Montel Williams Show (Dec. 6, 2006; WABC –
`
`New York Channel 7 (Dec. 17, 2006); FOX Business (March 19, 2008); The Today Show (Jan.
`
` 9
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 10 of 53 PageID: 10
`
`6, 2008); MTV; The Detroit News – “In our opinion - Zipit Z2 perfect for kids” (June 30, 2008);
`
`the Akron Beacon, Ohio.com (April 14, 2008); the Arizona Star (April 3, 2008); the
`
`BaltimoreSun.com (April 17, 2008); The Record NorthJersey.com “Kids and their parents will
`
`love the Z2 messaging device” (April 12, 2008); TheStreet.com “Instant Messaging With Mass
`
`Appeal” (Dec. 7, 2007); Digital Life “Digital Life Announces the Digital Life Innovators Class
`
`of 2007” (Sept. 24, 2007); E-Gear “Is Anybody Out There” (April 9, 2008); Gizmodo “Zipit Z2
`
`Wireless Messenger Lets Teens IM For Free” (Nov. 7, 2007); GoErie.com “ Txt all d tym” “IM
`
`friends without tying up computer” (April 11, 2008); CBS4Denver.com “One of the best
`
`products for teens, tweens and their parents” (2007); InfoSyncWorld.com “Zipit Z2 Wireless
`
`Messenger sends IMs without PC or phone” “it has a dedicated smiley button, which we have
`
`never seen before, but now we want on our Treo :-)” (Nov. 7, 2007); InsignifacantThoughts.com
`
`(Sept. 28, 2007); KansasCity.com “Better Messages” (Dec. 6, 2007); LinuxDevices.com (Nov. 9,
`
`2007); MiamiHerald.com (Oct. 18, 2007); ny1.com (Sept. 27, 2007); NYTimes.com (Oct. 4,
`
`2007); PCMag.com.br (Sept. 28, 2007); PC.Watch.Impress.co.JP (Dec. 9, 2007); Yahoo! News
`
`(Sept. 27, 2007); Register Hardware UK (Nov. 7, 2007); SlashGear.com (Sept. 27, 2007);
`
`StarTelegram.com “High-tech hobbies” (Oct. 14, 2007); the Minneapolis StarTribune.com (Oct.
`
`8, 2007); DailyHerald.com (June 23, 2008); The Gazette Canada.com (Oct. 11, 2007);
`
`TheStreet.com “Instant Messenger With Mass Appeal” “a must-have for travelers” (Dec. 7
`
`2007); TimeforKids.com (Nov. 26, 2007); Twice.com (Sept. 27, 2007); ABCNews.com (Nov. 2,
`
`2007); ABCNews: The Ultimate Gift Guide (Nov. 8, 2007); Adweek Magazine “Top 10 Trends
`
`of 2007” (Dec. 17, 2007); BlogStuff.com (Nov. 26, 2007); Blog-SciFi.com (Sept. 27, 2007);
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 11 of 53 PageID: 11
`
`Brighthand.com (Sept. 30, 2007); CBS Tech Toys Review (Oct. 16, 2007); and The Charlotte
`
`Observer Charlotte.com (Oct. 21, 2007). Exhibit “G.”
`
`Wi-Fi Instant Messaging Devices With Emoticons Drive Purchasing Decisions
`
`27.
`
`Prior to the existence of Wi-Fi instant messaging, carriers typically charged up to
`
`$0.20 per text, or $20.00 per month for unlimited texting. Thanks to Wi-Fi based instant
`
`messaging, however, consumers no longer had to pay for individual instant messages or monthly
`
`service plans. As a result, by 2016, it was estimated that consumers saved $54 billion
`
`($54,000,000,000) through the use of Wi-Fi instant messaging instead of from SMS-based
`
`instant messaging.
`
`28.
`
`Instant messaging has been and continues to be the single most important
`
`smartphone feature. Indeed, many potential customers are unlikely to purchase a smartphone
`
`that is not able to generate an instant message comprising an emoji / graphical symbol (J, L)
`
`that is sent over Wi-Fi.
`
`29.
`
`Using a handheld device, such as a smartphone, to send instant messages that
`
`contain emojis is a major and growing form of communication among an incredibly large
`
`demographic. Indeed, this is reflected by Oxford Dictionary’s “word” of the year for 2015,
`
`which was the “face with tears of joy” emoji:
`
`
`
`Oxford Dictionary selected the emoji as its “word” of the year because the emoji was “the ‘word’
`
`that best reflected the ethos, mood, and preoccupations of 2015.” It is further reflected by the
`
`11
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 12 of 53 PageID: 12
`
`creation of “World Emoji Day,” which is held annually on July 17.
`
`ZIPIT’S PATENTS
`
`30.
`
`The United States Patent and Trademark Office awarded Zipit two patents on its
`
`highly acclaimed “Instant Messaging Terminal Adapted For Wi-Fi Access Points,” U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,292,870 and U.S. Patent No. 7,894,837.
`
`Zipit’s U.S. Patent No. 7,292,870
`
`31.
`
`On November 6, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued United States Patent No. 7,292,870, entitled “Instant Messaging Terminal Adapted
`
`For WI-FI Access Points.” A true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,292,870 is attached
`
`hereto as Exhibit “A.”
`
`32.
`
`Zipit is the owner, by assignment, of all right, title, and interest in and to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,292,870 (hereinafter the “ʼ870 Patent”), including the right to sue for past, present,
`
`and future patent infringement, and to collect past, present, and future damages.
`
`33.
`
`The ʼ870 patent complies with the Patent Act, including 35 U.S.C. §101, 35
`
`U.S.C. §102, 35 U.S.C. § 103, and 35 U.S.C. §112. Exhibit “B.”
`
`34.
`
`On July 16, 2013, the Patent Office issued a Certificate of Correction for the ʼ870
`
`patent. Exhibit “C.”
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`Each and every claim of the ʼ870 patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`The ʼ870 patent and its claims are entitled to the benefit of the date upon which
`
`Zipit filed its provisional patent application 60/532,000, which was filed on December 24, 2003.
`
` Exhibit “D.”
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 13 of 53 PageID: 13
`
`37.
`
`As the invention(s) claimed in the ʼ870 patent were conceived no later than April
`
`2003, the claims of the ʼ870 patent are further entitled to a priority date of no later than April
`
`2003.
`
`IPR2014-01507
`
`38.
`
`On March 30, 2015, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United
`
`States Patent and Trademark Office instituted an Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of the ʼ870 patent.
`
`39.
`
`On June 22, 2015, Zipit filed its “Patent Owner’s Response Under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.120.” Exhibit “E.”
`
`40.
`
`On March 29, 2016, the PTAB issued a Final Decision that confirmed the
`
`patentability of all claims of the ʼ870 Patent in IPR2014-01507. Exhibit “F.”
`
`41.
`
`All papers and pleadings filed with the PTAB for IPR2014-01507 are part of the
`
`prosecution history of the ʼ870 Patent. Due to their size and volume, the papers and pleadings
`
`filed with the PTAB for IPR2014-01507 are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`IPR2019-01567
`
`42.
`
`On August 30, 2019, Defendant filed a Petition For Inter Partes Review of the
`
`ʼ870 Patent.
`
`43.
`
`On December 10, 2019, Zipit filed a Preliminary Response to Defendant’s
`
`Petition, requesting the PTAB to deny Defendant’s Petition. Exhibit “V,” 870 POPR.
`
`44.
`
`On information and belief, the PTAB should issue its Institution Decision
`
`regarding Defendant’s Petition in March 2020.
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 14 of 53 PageID: 14
`
`No Claim Of Zipit’s ’870 Patent Is Abstract
`
`45.
`
`The claims of the ʼ870 Patent are focused on an advance over the prior art such
`
`that their character as a whole is not directed to excluded subject matter, such as an abstract idea,
`
`or any other subject matter excluded under 35 U.S.C. §101. For example, the claims of the ʼ870
`
`patent are directed to improvements in computer functionality.
`
`46.
`
`The PTAB determined that the combinations claimed in the claims of the ʼ870
`
`Patent were novel and nonobvious, as did the Patent Office during its initial review of the claims.
`
`See, e.g., Exhibit “B” and Exhibit “F.”
`
`47.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent includes, inter alia, an
`
`instant messaging terminal and method that includes a housing, a display mounted in the
`
`housing, a data entry device that affords the generation of textual characters and graphical
`
`symbols, a wireless Internet protocol communications module, a wireless transceiver, and a
`
`control module that includes a processor for executing an application program to implement
`
`instant messaging and session protocols for a conversation. Such a claimed combination does
`
`not exist in the prior art. Such a combination was not well-understood, routine, or conventional.
`
` And such a combination constitutes a tangible, specific, concrete invention. The claimed
`
`combination also improved the operation of computer functionality, overcoming various failures
`
`with existing computing devices as discussed in the Background of the Invention and the
`
`Summary of the Invention.
`
`48.
`
`For example, providing the claimed combination in a handheld terminal (as
`
`opposed to a desktop, laptop, or PDA requiring external peripheral data entry and/or display
`
`devices) represented a significant advance in computer functionality, including allowing both
`
`14
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 15 of 53 PageID: 15
`
`textual characters and graphical symbols to be entered/generated using a data entry device
`
`integrated into the handheld terminal. This avoided the need for a platform to support the data
`
`entry device during data entry. Furthermore, the claimed data entry device for
`
`generating/entering textual characters and graphical symbols improved the efficiency of
`
`computing devices by allowing graphical symbols to be directly entered by a user, avoiding the
`
`need for the computing device to translate a sequence of textual characters into a graphical
`
`symbol prior to displaying and sending the graphical symbol.
`
`49.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent further includes, inter
`
`alia, an instant messaging terminal and method that, after loss of a network connection,
`
`automatically searches for a new connection and displays the conversation histories that were
`
`active when the network connection was lost. Such a claimed combination does not exist in the
`
`prior art. Such a combination was not well-understood, routine, or conventional. And such a
`
`combination constitutes a tangible, specific, concrete invention. Indeed, such functionality
`
`would have run counter to the state of the art due to concerns about the impact of battery life.
`
`This claimed capability represented a significant advance in computer functionality. For
`
`example, the claimed capability does not depend on user instruction to locate a connection after
`
`connection loss. Moreover, the claimed capability of displaying active conversation histories for
`
`active conversations terminated by loss of network connection improves upon the state of the art,
`
`in which such conversation histories were typically lost upon termination of the user’s network
`
`connection.
`
`50.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent further includes, inter
`
`alia, an instant messaging terminal and method that includes a plurality of keys for graphical
`
`15
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 16 of 53 PageID: 16
`
`symbols, each graphical symbol key including indicia identifying the graphical symbol generated
`
`by depressing the key bearing the indicia. Such a claimed combination does not exist in the prior
`
`art. Such a combination was not well-understood, routine, or conventional. And such a
`
`combination constitutes a tangible, specific, concrete invention. This claimed feature also relates
`
`to the improvement in the efficiency of computing devices discussed above allowing graphical
`
`symbols to be directly entered by a user, avoiding the need for the computing device to translate
`
`a sequence of textual characters into a graphical symbol prior to displaying and sending the
`
`graphical symbol.
`
`51.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent further includes, inter
`
`alia, an instant messaging terminal and method that includes at least one programmable key
`
`associated with a set of characters corresponding to a graphical symbol supported by an instant
`
`messaging service provider. Such a claimed combination does not exist in the prior art. Such a
`
`combination was not well-understood, routine, or conventional. And such a combination
`
`constitutes a tangible, specific, concrete invention. This claimed feature also relates to the
`
`improvement in the efficiency of computing devices discussed above allowing graphical symbols
`
`to be directly entered by a user, avoiding the need for the computing device to translate a
`
`sequence of textual characters into a graphical symbol prior to displaying and sending the
`
`graphical symbol.
`
`52.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent further includes, inter
`
`alia, an instant messaging terminal and method that includes a control module that stores a
`
`profile containing network settings for a network communicating with the communications
`
`module and the wireless transceiver through an access point. Such a claimed combination does
`
`16
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 17 of 53 PageID: 17
`
`not exist in the prior art. Such a combination was not well-understood, routine, or conventional.
`
` And such a combination constitutes a tangible, specific, concrete invention. This claimed
`
`capability further improves computer operation because it permits, for example, the handheld
`
`terminal to connect automatically to a network corresponding to a store profile without user
`
`intervention. See Exhibit “A,” ʼ870 Patent at 5:20-31.
`
`53.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent further includes, inter
`
`alia, an instant messaging terminal and method that includes a control module that includes an
`
`audio player for generating sound from a downloaded file. Such a claimed combination does not
`
`exist in the prior art. Such a combination was not well-understood, routine, or conventional.
`
`And such a combination constitutes a tangible, specific, concrete invention. Moreover, the
`
`provision of this capability in the claimed handheld terminal improved the operation of existing
`
`handheld terminals by, for example, allowing users to listen to music while exchanging instant
`
`messages (including generating/entering textual characters and graphical symbols using the data
`
`entry device) using a single handheld terminal.
`
`54.
`
`The advancement claimed in the claims of the ʼ870 Patent further includes, inter
`
`alia, an instant messaging terminal and method that includes a control module that generates
`
`sound from files received from an Internet radio station through a wireless, Internet protocol
`
`access point. Such a claimed combination does not exist in the prior art. Such a combination
`
`was not well-understood, routine, or conventional. And such a combination constitutes a
`
`tangible, specific, concrete invention. The provision of this capability in the claimed handheld
`
`terminal improved the operation of existing handheld terminals by, for example, allowing users
`
`to listen to sound files from an Internet radio station while exchanging instant messages
`
`17
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 18 of 53 PageID: 18
`
`(including generating/entering textual characters and graphical symbols using the data entry
`
`device) using a single handheld terminal.
`
`The Inventions Claimed In The ’870 Patent Were Not
`Well-Understood, Routine, Or Conventional
`
`55.
`
`Prior to Zipit’s invention, instant messaging primarily transpired with desktop
`
`
`
`computers.
`
`56.
`
`Prior to Zipit’s invention, text messages were sent over a carrier’s cellular
`
`network using SMS. Users sending and receiving text messages typically were charged for each
`
`text, including at rates of $0.20/text or $20/month.
`
`57.
`
`Zipit’s technology allowed instant messaging by a handheld instant messaging
`
`terminal using Wi-Fi, avoiding the expense of texting and the need to share a desktop computer
`
`for instant messaging.
`
`58.
`
`Zipit’s patented and claimed technology allowed mobile handheld devices to
`
`directly connect to a Wi-Fi access point without using an intermediate protocol in order to send
`
`instant messages comprising an emoji / graphical symbol (J, L) over Wi-Fi, instead of the
`
`cellular network.
`
`59.
`
`No claims of the ʼ870 Patent are unpatentable under §103. See, e.g., Exhibit “B”
`
`and Exhibit “F.” In addition, the patentability of the claims of the ʼ870 Patent is confirmed by
`
`the overwhelming evidence of widespread acclaim that Patentee’s “Zippy” and “Z2” devices
`
`received. Due to the several awards, newspaper stories, television stories, and online articles
`
`regarding Zipit’s “Zippy” and “Z2” devices, including for example: (i) Time Magazine’s “The
`
`Most Amazing Inventions of 2005” Award, which was awarded to Zipit Wireless, Inc. for its
`
`18
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-01494-KM-JBC Document 1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 19 of 53 PageID: 19
`
`“Zippy” device, (ii) the 2005 Chicago Tribune article, which declares that “Zipit Is King Of
`
`Messengers,” and (iii) PC Magazine’s “Winner” of its 2007 “Best of Show” award in the
`
`category of “Portable Gear,” which was awarded to Zipit for its “Z2” device, Zipit’s patented
`
`“Zippy” and “Z2” devices received widespread acclaim. Exhibit “G.”
`
`60.
`
`A nexus exists between Zipit’s “Zippy” device and the claims of the ʼ870 Patent.
`
`Exhibits “E,” “G,” and “V.”
`
`61.
`
`A nexus also exists between Zipit’s acclaimed “Z2” device and the claims of the
`
`ʼ870 Patent. Exhibits “E,” “G,” and “V.”
`
`Zipit’s U.S. Patent No. 7,894,837 Patent
`
`62.
`
`On February 22, 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
`
`legally issued United States Patent No. 7,894,837, entitled “Instant Messaging Terminal Adapted
`
`For Wireless Communication Access Points.” A true and correct copy of U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,894,837 is attached hereto as Exhibit “H.”
`
`63.
`
`Zipit is the owner, by assignment, of all right, title, and interest in and to U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,894,837 (hereinafter the “ʼ837 Patent”), including the right to sue for past, present,
`
`and future patent infringement, and to collect past, present, and future damages.
`
`64.
`
`The ʼ837 Patent complies with the Patent Act, including 35 U.S.C. §101, 35
`
`U.S.C. §102, 35 U.S.C. § 103, and 35 U.S.C. §112. Exhibit “I.”
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`Each and every claim of the ʼ837 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`The ʼ837 patent and its claims are entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the
`
`ʼ870 patent (May 14, 2004) and also the date upon which Zipit filed its provisional patent
`
`application (December 23, 2003). Exhibit “D.”
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket