`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
`
`
`
`CNSP, INC., d/b/a NMSURF; and ALBERT
`CATANACH,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 1:17-cv-00827-MCA-KRS
`
`
`v.
`
`CITY OF SANTA FE,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF
`RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAYING DISCOVERY
`
`
`
`THIS MATTER comes before the Court following a telephonic status conference held
`
`on November 16, 2017. During the conference, the parties and the Court discussed the Court’s
`
`obligation to enter a scheduling order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 or find good
`
`cause to delay entry of such an order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2) (requiring the Court to “issue
`
`the scheduling order as soon as is practicable, but unless the judge finds good cause for delay,
`
`the judge must issue it within the earlier of 90 days after any defendant has been served with the
`
`complaint or 60 days after any defendant has appeared”). After hearing from the parties and in
`
`light of the pending motions requesting various forms of dispositive and related relief, the Court
`
`found good cause to delay entering a scheduling order and granted the parties’ oral motion to
`
`stay discovery pending resolution of the motions.
`
`
`
`IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that good cause exists to delay entering a Rule 16
`
`scheduling order for the reasons stated on the record. The Court shall not issue a scheduling
`
`order until resolution of the pending motions.
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00827-MCA-KRS Document 21 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties’ oral motion to stay discovery is GRANTED
`
`and discovery in this matter is STAYED pending resolution of the pending motions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___________________________________
`KEVIN R. SWEAZEA
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
