throbber
Case 1:21-cv-05527 Document 1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`----------------------------------------------------------------------x
`WAUSAU BUSINESS INSURANCE
`COMPANY,
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CLOVE LAKES HEAL TH CARE AND
`REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`----------------------------------------------------------------------x
`M A D A M S/S I R S:
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff WAUSAU BUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY ("Wausau
`
`Business"), by its attorneys, JAFFE & ASHER LLP, as and for its Complaint against
`
`defendant CLOVE LAKES HEAL TH CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER, INC.
`
`("Clove Lakes"), allege as follows:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1332(a) by reason of the diversity of citizenship of the parties and the fact that the
`
`amounts in controversy exceed the sum of $75,000 exclusive of costs. This is an action
`
`for damages based upon breach of contract.
`
`2.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Wausau Business was, and still is,
`
`a stock insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, with its
`
`principal place of business located at 1 7 5 Berkeley Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.
`
`3.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Wausau Business was, and still is,
`
`an insurance company duly authorized to conduct business within the State of New York.
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05527 Document 1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, at all times hereinafter mentioned,
`
`Clove Lakes was, and still is, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New
`
`York, with its principal place of business located at 25 Fanning Street, Staten Island, New
`
`York 10952.
`
`5.
`
`Upon information and belief, at all times hereinafter mentioned,
`
`Clove Lakes was, and still is, in the business of owing and running a health care and
`
`rehabilitation center.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff repeats and realleges each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs "1" through "5" of this Complaint as through fully set forth at length herein.
`
`7.
`
`At the special instance and request of Clove Lakes, Wausau Business
`
`issued a Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy, No. WCK-Y91-
`
`443783-016, with a policy period from November 21, 2006 to November 21, 2007,
`
`to Clove Lakes as the Named Insured (the "Wausau Policy").
`
`8.
`
`The premiums for the Wausau Policy is determined, in part, based
`
`upon Clove Lakes' payroll during the policy period and the classification of each
`
`employee's employment.
`
`· 9. Wausau Business duly conducted audits of the Clove Lakes' payroll
`
`for of the Wausau Policy, and Clove Lakes has not raised any issues or objections to the
`
`audit results.
`
`10.
`
`In addition, pursuant to an agreement entitled "Retrospective
`
`Premium Endorsement Large Risk Alternative Rating Option," which Clove Lakes signed
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05527 Document 1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 3
`
`for and is part of the Wausau Policy, Clove Lakes and Wausau Business agreed that the
`
`premiums would be based, in part, upon Incurred Losses under the Wausau Policies (the
`
`"Retrospective Premium").
`
`11 . Clove Lakes agreed that the Retrospective Premium would be
`
`calculated annually, and Clove Lakes agreed to pay Retrospective Premium when invoiced.
`
`12. Clove Lakes has satisfied and paid all Retrospective Premium
`
`obligations for the respective adjustments that occurred prior to 2021.
`
`13. On or about May 20, 2021, Wausau Business issued its 2021
`
`retrospective adjustment invoice, which included the Fourteenth Retrospective Adjustment
`
`for the 2006-07 Policy (the "2021 Retrospective Adjustment").
`
`14. The 2021 Retrospective Adjustment was based upon a May 1, 2021
`
`valuation date claims.
`
`15. As a result of the 2021 Retrospective Adjustment, the sum of
`
`$236,342 became due and owing to Wausau Business by Clove Lakes.
`
`16. Although duly demanded, Clove Lakes has failed and refused to pay
`
`the $236,342, except that Clove Lakes received a credit of $21 for the Eleventh
`
`Retrospective Adjustment on the 2009 to 2010 policy, leaving the sum of $236,321
`
`due and owing to Wausau Business by Clove Lakes for the 2021 Retrospective
`
`Adjustment.
`
`17.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, Wausau Business has sustained damages of
`
`$236,321, plus interest at 9% per annum from May 20, 2021.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05527 Document 1 Filed 10/05/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 4
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff WAUSAU BUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY
`
`demands judgment against defendant CLOVE LAKES HEALTH CARE AND
`
`REHABILITATION CENTER, INC. in the sum of $236,321, plus interest at 9% per
`
`annum from May 20, 2021, and granting plaintiff the costs and disbursements of this
`
`action, together with such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`October 5, 2021
`
`Yours, etc.
`
`JAFFE & ASHER LLP
`
`~~
`
`By_: - - - - - - -- - -
`Marshall T. Potashner, Esq.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`WAUSAU BUSINESS INSURANCE
`COMPANY
`445 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 405
`White Plains, New York 10601
`(212) 687-3000
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket