throbber
Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 10 PagelD #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISCTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`X
`
`FRIENDS NYC, EMMA KADAR-PENNERand
`MARY MEYER,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-against-
`
`PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CIVIL COMPLAINT
`
`CaseNo.: Z/ C!lV S730
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`Plaintiffs, FRIENDS NYC, EMMA KADAR-PENNER and MARY
`
`MEYER,bytheir attorneys, GOUCHEV LAW,asandfor their Verified
`
`Complaint respectfully allege as follows:
`
`PARTIES AND VENUE
`
`1. Plaintiff, FRIENDS NYC,is a domestic organization, with a principal place
`
`of business located at 56 Bogart Street, Brooklyn, NY 11206. Plaintiffs,
`
`EMMA KADAR-PENNERand MARY MEYER,are the owners of
`
`FRIENDS NYC. Hereinafter, FRIENDS NYC, EMMA KADAR-PENNER
`
`and MARY MEYER,arecollectively referred to as “Plaintiffs.”
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 2 of 10 PagelD #: 2
`
`2. Defendant, PAYPAL HOLDINGSINC. (PAYPAL),is a foreign business,
`
`doing business in San Jose, California, hereinafter “Defendant.”
`
`3. Venueis proper and based on Plaintiffs principal place of business, whichis
`
`located in Brooklyn, NY, within the Eastern District of New York.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`4. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter based on a federal question
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, et seq.
`
`5. Specifically, the 2018 Hemp Farm Act(the “Act”) provides:
`
`"InJo State ... shall prohibit the transportation or shipment of hemp or
`hemp products produced in accordance with subtitle G of the
`Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 ... through the State."
`Pub. L. 115-334, § 10114 (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 1639 note).
`
`6. Additionally, the Act removed hemp,defined as cannabis (Cannabis sativa
`
`L.) and derivatives of cannabis with extremely low concentrations of the
`
`psychoactive compounddelta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (no more than
`
`0.3 percent THC on a dry weight basis), from the definition of marijuana in
`
`the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
`
`7. Plaintiffs request that this court hear whether the Defendant violated the Act
`
`based on an alleged violation of its Acceptable Use Policy based on deeming
`
`Plaintiffs to have been engagedin the sale of narcotics for products that
`
`contained less than 0.3 percent THC.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 3 of 10 PagelD #: 3
`
`FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`8. Plaintiffs opened an account with Defendant on or about December 2012.
`
`9. The following email addressesare linked to Plaintiffs account and bank
`
`accounts with Defendant:
`
`Emma Kadar Penner emmakpenner@gmail.com,personal
`Mary Meyer Clothing mary@marymeyerclothing.com, business
`Mary Meyerhello@friendsnyc.com, business
`Mary Meyerfriendsnycpayments@gmail.com, business
`Mary Meyer marymeyershops@gmail.com, personal
`
`10.Plaintiffs sold various goods using Defendant’s platform without incident for
`
`8 years.
`
`11.Plaintiff’s goods included home,gift and clothing as merchandise.
`
`12.During 2018, Plaintiffs expanded their product line into certain CBD oil
`
`products containing less than 3% THC, while most products contained 0%
`
`(CBD Products).
`
`13.Plaintiffs used Defendantas a third party vendorto collect paymentfor the
`
`sale of these CBD Products.
`
`14.0n December2, 2020, Plaintiffs received a notice from Defendantthat both
`
`their business and personal accounts werelocked, that Plaintiffs were
`
`permanently barred from transacting any businesssales with Defendant and
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 4 of 10 PagelD #: 4
`
`furthermore, that a hold was placed on approximately $ 9,000.00 in total
`
`representing variousof Plaintiffs funds (“Plaintiff's Funds”). Exhibit “A”
`
`15.Pursuant to the Defendant’s User Agreement(“User Agreement’),
`
`Defendant informed Plaintiffs that it would be holding the Plaintiffs Funds
`
`for up to 180 days pending an investigation.
`
`16.Plaintiffs made numerousattempts to resolve this matter with the Defendant
`
`but were given no information as to the cause for a 6 month period.
`
`17.Defendant respondedstating that it would only release information about
`
`Plaintiffs PayPal accountsif they received a legal subpoena. Exhibit B.
`
`18.Plaintiffs attempted to resolve this with Defendant over the course of the 180
`
`days, with no avail.
`
`19.Defendant never contacted Plaintiffs regarding the investigation, as such
`
`Plaintiffs were never afforded an opportunity to evaluate the cause of the
`
`suspension orprovide any facts to dispute the same.
`
`20.On May 20, 2021, Plaintiffs received notice from Defendant that $3, 958.01
`
`was withdrawn from their account as “damages caused by Acceptable Use
`
`Policy violation.” This same notice provides a link to dispute this
`
`withdrawal and whenfollowed,sets forth that there is no recourse available
`
`for the claim. See Exhibit C.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 5 of 10 PagelD #: 5
`
`21.. The only information Plaintiffs were able to ascertain during this 6
`
`month period from Defendant was a vagueallegationthat Plaintiffs violated
`
`Defendant’s “Acceptable Use Policy.”
`
`22. During this time, Defendant withheld and converted these funds of
`
`Plaintiffs, without notice and later revealed that it was based on a violation
`
`of Defendant’s Acceptable Use Policy which is repugnant and violates the
`
`Act.
`
`23. A review of Defendant’s Acceptable Use Policy sets forth four
`
`categories relating to Prohibited activities.
`
`24. Plaintiffs reviewed the same due to Defendant's failure to set forth any
`
`cause based onthelist and were unable to determine the causesinceall
`
`activities listed were outside the scope of their business model and products.
`
`25. On June 11, 2021, Defendant sent a message setting forth a reason for
`
`cutting off the businessrelationship citing sale of narcotics resulting in loss
`
`of funds and/or damages. In relevant part the email provided:
`
`“After a review of your accountactivity, we've determinedthat you're in
`violation of PayPal's Acceptable Use Policy. Specifically, the sale of
`narcotics, steroids, drug paraphernalia, certain controlled substances, or
`other products that present a risk to consumersafety. As a result, your
`account has been permanently limited and you won't be able to conduct any
`further business using PayPal. This is permitted under the PayPal User
`Agreementsections Restricted Activities and Actions We May Take.”
`
`Exhibit D
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 6 of 10 PagelD #: 6
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`/
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiffs restate and reiterate each and every allegation set forth in
`
`paragraphs 1-25 aboveasif stated fully herein.
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into a contract for services in or about
`
`December, 2012.
`
`28.
`
`Pursuant to the contract, Plaintiffs utilized Defendant’s services as a third
`
`party platform for the receipt of payments for products it sold.
`
`29.
`
`Plaintiffs accepted the terms of the contract, including Defendant’s
`
`Acceptable Use Policy.
`
`30. Defendant breached the contract on December2, 2020, and multiple times
`
`thereafter by barring them andrestricting them from doing business without
`
`providing a basis or notice of any kind, and placed a hold on approximately $
`
`9,000.00 in total.
`
`31. Defendant breached the contract on May 20, 2021, when Plaintiffs received
`
`notice from Defendant that $3, 958.01 was withdrawn from their accountas
`
`“damages caused by Acceptable UsePolicy violation” without providing a basis
`
`or notice of any kind.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 7 of 10 PagelD #: 7
`
`32. Defendant breached the contract on June 11, 2021, when Defendantsent a
`
`messagesetting forth a reason for cutting off the businessrelationship citing sale of
`
`narcotics resulting in loss of Plaintiffs funds and/or damages.
`
`33.
`
`That by reason ofsaid breaches of contract, Plaintiffs have been damaged
`
`and continue to sustain damages.
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`34.
`
`Plaintiff restates and reiterates each and every allegation set forth in
`
`paragraphs 1-33 aboveasif stated fully herein.
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiffs provided the Defendant with access to their bank accounts linked
`
`to their email addresses set forth above herein.
`
`36.
`
`On December2, 2020, and multiple times thereafter, Defendant intentionally
`
`interfered to the exclusion ofPlaintiffs rights the funds that were held in the
`
`Plaintiffs bank accounts that were linked as set forth above in para.9.
`
`37. On December2, 2020, and multiple times thereafter, Defendantintentionally
`
`interfered with the possession andright to possessionof Plaintiffs rights to the
`
`fundsheld in the Plaintiffs bank accounts that were linked as set forth above in
`
`para.9.
`
`38.
`
`That by reason of said conduct caused by Defendant, Plaintiffs have been
`
`damaged and continue to sustain damages.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 8 of 10 PagelD #: 8
`
`39.
`
`Therefore, Plaintiff demands judgmentin her favoras set forth below.
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiff restates and reiterates each and every allegationset forth in
`
`paragraphs1-39 aboveasif stated fully herein.
`
`41.
`
`On December2, 2020, Plaintiffs received a notice from Defendantthat both
`
`their business and personal accountslinked at set forth above in para. 9 were
`
`locked,that Plaintiffs were permanently barred from transacting any businesssales
`
`with Defendant and furthermore, and that a hold was placed on approximately $
`
`9,000.00 in total representing variousof Plaintiffs funds (“Plaintiffs Funds”).
`
`42. On May 20, 2021, Plaintiffs received another notice from Defendantthat $3,
`
`958.01 was withdrawn from their accountas “damages caused by Acceptable Use
`
`Policy violation.” This same notice providesa link to dispute this withdrawal and
`
`when followed,sets forth that there is no recourse available for the claim. See
`
`Exhibit C.
`
`43. On June 11, 2021, Defendant senta third a message setting forth a reason for
`
`cutting off the business relationship citing sale of narcotics resulting in loss of
`
`funds and/or damages. In relevant part the email provided:
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 9 of 10 PagelD #: 9
`
`“After a review of your accountactivity, we've determined that you're in
`violation of PayPal's Acceptable Use Policy. Specifically, the sale of
`narcotics, steroids, drug paraphernalia, certain controlled substances, or
`other products that present a risk to consumersafety. As a result, your
`account has been permanently limited and you won't be able to conduct any
`further business using PayPal. This is permitted under the PayPal User
`Agreementsections Restricted Activities and Actions We MayTake.”
`
`Exhibit D
`
`44.
`
`Defendant withheld and converted these fundsof Plaintiffs, without notice
`
`and based on a violation of Defendant’s Acceptable Use Policy which is repugnant
`
`andviolates the Act.
`
`45. Defendant breached its contract with Plaintiffs based on a violation of
`
`Defendant’s Acceptable Use Policy which is repugnantand violates the Act.
`
`46. As aresult of Defendant’s conduct, Plaintiffs suffered a deprivation of property
`
`without due process andrelated to a finding repugnant to US law,and suffered
`
`damages,including but not limited to economic and consequential damages.
`
`WHEREFORE,Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendantas follows:
`
`a. Nine percentinterest from December2, 2020, regarding the holdthat
`Defendant placed on Plaintiffs funds for approximately $ 9,000.00, and
`b. Damagesin the amount of $3, 958.01 plus nine percentinterest from May
`20, 2021, and
`c. Punitive damages, attorney’s fees, costs and disbursementsfor the entire
`action no less than $100,000.00, and
`d. Granting such other and furtherrelief as the Court may deem just and
`proper.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-05920 Document1 Filed 10/25/21 Page 10 of 10 PagelD #: 10
`
`Dated:
`
`New York, New York
`October 25, 2021
`
`GOUCHEV LAW
`
`Wt, X0-¢¢4
`
`Dorothy H. Riggio, Esq.
`45 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor
`New York NY 10111
`Tel. (212) 537-9209
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket