throbber
Case 2:16-cv-03639-JMA-AYS Document 11 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 36
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`--------------------------------------------------------------------X
`BRIAN KEITH DUDLEY,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ORDER
` 16-CV-3639 (JMA)(AYS)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`-against-
`
`SHERIFF MICHAEL J. SPOSATO, NASSAU COUNTY,
`DETECTIVE TRACEY S. CABEY, NASSAU COUNTY
`POLICE DEPARTMENT, NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT
`ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, D.A. MADELINE SINGAS,
`A.D.A. MICHAEL BUSHWACK,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------------X
`AZRACK, United States District Judge:
`
`
`On June 20, 2016, incarcerated pro se plaintiff Brian Keith Dudley (“plaintiff”) filed a
`
`complaint in this Court against Nassau County Sheriff Michael J. Sposato (“Sheriff Sposato”),
`
`Nassau County, Detective Tracey S. Cabey (“Det. Cabey”), the Nassau County Police Department
`
`(the “NCPD”), the Nassau County District Attorney’s Office (the “NCDA”), Nassau County
`
`District Attorney Madeline Singas (“D.A. Singas”) and Assistant District Attorney Michael
`
`Bushwack (“A.D.A. Bushwack” and collectively, “defendants”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
`
`(“Section 1983”), alleging a deprivation of his constitutional rights. Accompanying the
`
`complaint is an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
`
`In the complaint, plaintiff seeks to challenge his arrest for promoting prison contraband in
`
`the first degree in violation of New York Penal Law § 205.25(2), a class D felony. More
`
`specifically, plaintiff claims that he was framed by two other inmates who planted a shank in his
`
`cell and that plaintiff was improperly arrested, charged, and disciplined as a result. (Compl.
`
`¶ IV.)
`
`Plaintiff alleges that he was found guilty following a disciplinary hearing on December 2,
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`FILED 
`CLERK 


`U.S. DISTRICT COURT 
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
`LONG ISLAND OFFICE 
`
`11/13/2017 2:41 pm
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-03639-JMA-AYS Document 11 Filed 11/13/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 37
`
`2015, but claims that the Sheriff did not produce “key witnesses” who had exculpatory evidence
`
`and, had they been called to testify, “plaintiff could have had all charges pending against him
`
`dismissed.” (Id. at 6.) Thus, plaintiff claims to have been falsely arrested and maliciously
`
`prosecuted. (Id. ¶ IV.A)
`
` Plaintiff also complains that although the search of his cell occurred on November 21,
`
`2015, Det. Cabey “falsified documents” by alleging that the incident occurred on February 2, 2016
`
`in the felony complaint filed against him. (Id. at 7.)
`
`Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a letter with the Court by December 11, 2017 that explains
`
`the status of the criminal action stemming from this arrest and the felony complaint against him.
`
`If plaintiff fails to file this letter by December 11, 2017, his action may be dismissed for failure
`
`to prosecute.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: November 13, 2017
` Central Islip, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___/s/ (JMA)___________________
`Joan M. Azrack
`
`
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket