`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`--------------------------------------------X
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`13-cv-6326 (TPG)
`
`v.
`
`PREVEZON HOLDINGS LTD. et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ECF CASE
`
`ORDER
`
`--------------------------------------------X
`
`For the reasons discussed at the March 9, 2015 hearing, the court grants
`
`the motion to quash the Aspen Subpoenas purportedly served on William F.
`
`Browder ("Browder") and other non-parties. (Dkt. No. 111).
`
`For the reasons also discussed at the March 9, 20 15 hearing, the court
`
`holds that Browder was properly served with the New York Subpoena. The
`
`court further finds that Browder "regularly transacts business in person" in
`
`New York as CEO of Hermitage Capital, and. as an author and activist.
`
`See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c). The court thus holds that Browder is subject to
`
`deposition in New York under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`The New York Subpoena is now returnable April 15, 2015.
`
`The court reiterates the need to minimize the time and expense involved
`
`in litigating any remaining issues pertaining to the New York Subpoena. To
`
`that end, the parties and Browder should confer to narrow such issues and to
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-06326-TPG Document 252 Filed 03/10/15 Page 2 of 2
`
`reach agreements on scope and confidentiality. If issues remain in dispute, the
`
`parties and Browder shall submit letters to the court outlining their positions
`
`no later than March 13, 2015, in advance of the next scheduled status
`
`conference. Such letters must not exceed three pages.
`
`This order resolves the entries listed as items 111 and 226 on the docket.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`March 10, 2015
`
`U.S. District Judge
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
