`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`CRYSTAL CARTER, SUSAN CIFELLI, and
`LETITIA TAYLOR, individually and on
`behalf of all others similarly situated,
`
`
` Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`v.
`
`
`DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs Crystal Carter, Susan Cifelli, and Letitia Taylor (“Plaintiffs”), individually and
`
`on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, by and through their attorneys, make the following
`
`allegations pursuant to the investigation of their counsel and based upon information and belief,
`
`except as to allegations specifically pertaining to themselves and their counsel, which are based
`
`on personal knowledge.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a class action suit brought on behalf of all persons with Facebook accounts
`
`who watch videos on hgtv.com and subscribe to HGTV’s newsletter.
`
`2.
`
`Discovery Communications, LLC (“Defendant” or “HGTV”) develops, owns, and
`
`operates hgtv.com, a website that hosts and delivers hundreds of videos1 featuring “home and
`
`lifestyle content.”2 The website’s content is popular among viewers, “attract[ing] an average of
`
`9.9 million people each month.”3
`
`
`1 HGTV, VIDEOS, https://www.hgtv.com/videos.
`2 DISCOVERY, HGTV SERIES ‘GOOD BONES’ DELIVERS STRONG SEASON
`PERFORMANCES IN KEY DEMOS, https://press.discovery.com/us/hgtv/press-
`releases/2021/hgtv-series-good-bones-delivers-strong-season-5558/.
`3 Id.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 2 of 25
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Defendant monetizes its website by knowingly collecting and disclosing its
`
`subscribers’ personally identifiable information—including a record of every video clip they
`
`view—to Facebook without consent.
`
`4.
`
`The United States Congress passed the Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”) in
`
`1988, seeking to confer onto consumers the power to “maintain control over personal
`
`information divulged and generated in exchange for receiving services from video tape service
`
`providers.” S. Rep. No. 100-599, at 8. “The Act reflects the central principle of the Privacy Act
`
`of 1974: that information collected for one purpose may not be used for a different purpose
`
`without the individual’s consent.” Id.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant violated the VPPA by knowingly transmitting Plaintiffs’ and the
`
`putative class’s personally identifiable information to unrelated third parties.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`The VPPA
`
`6.
`
`The origins of the VPPA begin with President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of
`
`I.
`
`
`Judge Robert Bork to the United States Supreme Court. During the confirmation process, a
`
`movie rental store disclosed the nominee’s rental history to the Washington City Paper, who then
`
`published that history. Congress responded by passing the VPPA, with an eye toward the digital
`
`future. As Senator Patrick Leahy, who introduced the Act, explained:
`
`It is nobody’s business what Oliver North or Robert Bork or Griffin Bell or Pat
`Leahy watch on television or read or think about when they are home. In an area
`of interactive television cables, the growth of computer checking and check-out
`counters, of security systems and telephones, all lodged together in computers, it
`would be relatively easy at some point to give a profile of a person and tell what
`they buy in a store, what kind of food they like, what sort of television programs
`they watch, who are some of the people they telephone. I think that is wrong.
`
`S. Rep. 100-599, at 5-6 (internal ellipses and brackets omitted).
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 3 of 25
`
`
`
`7.
`
`The VPPA prohibits “[a] video tape service provider who knowingly discloses, to
`
`any person, personally identifiable information concerning any consumer of such provider.” 18
`
`U.S.C. § 2710(b)(1). The VPPA defines personally identifiable information as “information
`
`which identifies a person as having requested or obtained specific video materials or services
`
`from a video service provider.” 18 U.S.C. § 2710(a)(3). A video tape service provider is “any
`
`person, engaged in the business, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, of rental, sale, or
`
`delivery of prerecorded video cassette tapes or similar audio visual materials.” 18 U.S.C. §
`
`2710(a)(4).
`
`II.
`
`The Facebook Tracking Pixel
`
`8.
`
`Facebook is the largest social networking site on the planet, touting 2.9 billion
`
`monthly active users.4 Facebook describes itself as a “real identity platform,”5 meaning users
`
`are allowed only one account and must share “the name they go by in everyday life.”6 To that
`
`end, when creating an account, users must provide their first and last name, along with their
`
`birthday and gender.7
`
`9.
`
`Facebook generates revenue by selling advertising space on its website.8
`
`
`4 Sean Burch, Facebook Climbs to 2.9 Billion Users, Report 29.1 Billion in Q2 Sales, YAHOO
`(July 28, 2021), https://www.yahoo.com/now/facebook-climbs-2-9-billion-202044267.html
`5 Sam Schechner and Jeff Horwitz, How Many Users Does Facebook Have? The Company
`Struggles to Figure It Out, WALL. ST. J. (Oct. 21, 2021).
`6 FACEBOOK, COMMUNITY STANDARDS, PART IV INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY,
`https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/integrity_authenticity.
`7 FACEBOOK, SIGN UP, https://www.facebook.com/
`8 Mike Isaac, Facebook’s profit surges 101 percent on strong ad sales., N.Y. TIMES (July 28,
`2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/28/business/facebook-q2-earnings.html.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`10.
`
` Facebook sells advertising space by highlighting its ability to target users.9
`
`Facebook can target users so effectively because it surveils user activity both on and off its site.10
`
`This allows Facebook to make inferences about users beyond what they explicitly disclose, like
`
`their “interests,” “behavior,” and “connections.”11 Facebook compiles this information into a
`
`generalized dataset called “Core Audiences,” which advertisers use to apply highly specific
`
`filters and parameters for their targeted advertisements.12
`
`11.
`
`Advertisers can also build “Custom Audiences.”13 Custom Audiences enable
`
`advertisers to reach “people who have already shown interest in [their] business, whether they’re
`
`loyal customers or people who have used [their] app or visited [their] website.”14 Advertisers can
`
`use a Custom Audience to target existing customers directly, or they can use it to build a
`
`“Lookalike Audiences,” which “leverages information such as demographics, interests, and
`
`behavior from your source audience to find new people who share similar qualities.”15 Unlike
`
`Core Audiences, Custom Audiences require an advertiser to supply the underlying data to
`
`Facebook. They can do so through two mechanisms: by manually uploading contact information
`
`
`9 FACEBOOK, WHY ADVERTISE ON FACEBOOK,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/205029060038706.
`10 FACEBOOK, ABOUT FACEBOOK PIXEL,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/742478679120153?id=1205376682832142.
`11 FACEBOOK, AD TARGETING: HELP YOUR ADS FIND THE PEOPLE WHO WILL LOVE YOUR BUSINESS,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/ads/ad-targeting.
`12 FACEBOOK, EASIER, MORE EFFECTIVE WAYS TO REACH THE RIGHT PEOPLE ON FACEBOOK,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/news/Core-Audiences.
`13 FACEBOOK, ABOUT CUSTOM AUDIENCES,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/744354708981227?id=2469097953376494.
`14 FACEBOOK, ABOUT EVENTS CUSTOM AUDIENCE,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/366151833804507?id=300360584271273.
`15 FACEBOOK, ABOUT LOOKALIKE AUDIENCES,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/164749007013531?id=401668390442328.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 5 of 25
`
`
`
`for customers, or by utilizing Facebook’s “Business Tools,” which collect and transmit the data
`
`automatically.16 One such Business Tool is the Facebook Tracking Pixel.
`
`12.
`
`The Facebook Tracking Pixel is a piece of code that advertisers, like Defendant,
`
`can integrate into their website. Once activated, the Facebook Tracking Pixel “tracks the people
`
`and type of actions they take.”17 When the Facebook Tracking Pixel captures an action, it sends
`
`a record to Facebook. Once this record is received, Facebook processes it, analyzes it, and
`
`assimilates it into datasets like the Core Audiences and Custom Audiences.
`
`13.
`
`Advertisers control what actions—or, as Facebook calls it, “events”—the
`
`Facebook Tracking Pixel will collect, including the website’s metadata, along with what pages a
`
`visitor views.18 Advertisers can also configure the Facebook Tracking Pixel to track other
`
`events. Facebook offers a menu of “standard events” from which advertisers can choose,
`
`including what content a visitor views or purchases.19 An advertiser can also create their own
`
`tracking parameters by building a “custom event.”20
`
`14.
`
`Advertisers control how the Facebook Tracking Pixel identifies visitors. The
`
`Facebook Tracking Pixel is configured to automatically collect “HTTP Headers” and “Pixel-
`
`
`16 FACEBOOK, CREATE A CUSTOMER LIST CUSTOM AUDIENCE,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/170456843145568?id=2469097953376494;
`FACEBOOK, CREATE A WEBSITE CUSTOM AUDIENCE,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/1474662202748341?id=2469097953376494.
`17 FACEBOOK, RETARGETING, https://www.facebook.com/business/goals/retargeting.
`18 See FACEBOOK, FACEBOOK PIXEL, ACCURATE EVENT TRACKING, ADVANCED,
`https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-pixel/advanced/; see also FACEBOOK, BEST
`PRACTICES FOR FACEBOOK PIXEL SETUP,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/218844828315224?id=1205376682832142.
`19 FACEBOOK, SPECIFICATIONS FOR FACEBOOK PIXEL STANDARD EVENTS,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/402791146561655?id=1205376682832142.
`20 FACEBOOK, ABOUT STANDARD AND CUSTOM WEBSITE EVENTS,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/964258670337005?id=1205376682832142.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 6 of 25
`
`
`
`specific Data.”21 HTTP Headers collect “IP addresses, information about the web browser, page
`
`location, document, referrer and persons using the website.”22 Pixel-specific Data includes “the
`
`Pixel ID and cookie.”23
`
`II.
`
`HGTV And The Facebook Pixel
`
`HGTV’s website hosts and delivers hundreds of videos.
`
`HGTV hosts the Facebook Tracking Pixel and transmits nine distinct events to
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`Facebook:24
`
` Figure 1
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Each metric independently and jointly permits an ordinary person to identify a
`
`video and the video’s content.
`
`//
`
`
`21 FACEBOOK, FACEBOOK PIXEL, https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-pixel/.
`22 Id.
`23 Id.
`24 This data derives from a tool created and offered by Facebook.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 7 of 25
`
`
`
`18.
`
`PageView discloses a video’s URL whenever a viewer accesses that webpage.
`
`Figure 2
`
`
`
`19.
`
`ViewContent likewise discloses that video’s URL.
`
`Figure 3
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 8 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`20. Microdata and Button Click also discloses the video’s title.
`
`Figures 4 & 5
`
`
`
`21.
`
`VideoAdStart and VideoAdComplete discloses when a viewer starts and finishes
`
`the advertisement that plays before the video.
`
`Figures 6 & 7
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 9 of 25
`
`
`
`22.
`
`VideoContentStart and VideoContentComplete register and disclose when a
`
`viewer starts and finishes the video’s content.
`
`Figures 8 & 9
`
`
`
`23.
`
`All eight events, independently and jointly, permit an ordinary person to identify a
`
`video’s content, title, and URL.
`
`24. When a visitor watches a video on hgtv.com while logged into Facebook, HGTV
`
`compels a visitor’s browser to transmit the c_user cookie to Facebook. The c_user cookie
`
`contains that visitor’s unencrypted Facebook ID. When accessing the above video, for example,
`
`HGTV compelled the browser to send eight cookies:
`
`Figure 10
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 10 of 25
`
`
`
`25. When a visitor’s browser has recently logged out of Facebook, HGTV will
`
`compel the browser to send a smaller set of cookies:25
`
`Figure 11
`
`
`
`26.
`
`The fr cookie contains, at least, an encrypted Facebook ID and browser
`
`identifier.26 The _fbp cookie contains, at least, an unencrypted value that uniquely identifies a
`
`browser.27 The datr cookies also identifies a browser. 28 Facebook, at a minimum, uses the fr
`
`and _fbp cookies to identify users.29
`
`27.
`
`If a visitor has never created a Facebook account, HGTV transmits three cookies,
`
`two of which are visible here:30
`
`Figure 12
`
`
`
`28. Without a corresponding Facebook ID, the fr cookie contains, at least, an
`
`abbreviated and encrypted value that identifies the browser. The _fbp cookie contains, at least,
`
`
`25 The _fbp cookie, visible in Figure 10, is not shown here but is still transmitted.
`26 DATA PROTECTION COMMISSIONER, FACEBOOK IRELAND LTD, REPORT OF RE-AUDIT (Sept. 21,
`2012), http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/ODPC_Review.pdf.
`27 FACEBOOK, CONVERSION API, https://developers.facebook.com/docs/marketing-
`api/conversions-api/parameters/fbp-and-fbc/.
`28 FACEBOOK, COOKIES & OTHER STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES,
`https://www.facebook.com/policy/cookies/.
`29 FACEBOOK, COOKIES & OTHER STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES,
`https://www.facebook.com/policy/cookies/.
`30 The _fbp cookie, visible in Figure 10, is not shown here but is still transmitted.
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 11 of 25
`
`
`
`an unencrypted value that uniquely identifies a browser. Facebook uses both for targeted
`
`advertising.
`
`29.
`
`The fr cookie will expire after 90 days unless the visitor’s browser logs back into
`
`Facebook.31 If that happens, the time resets, and another 90 days begins to accrue.32
`
`30.
`
`The _fbp cookie will expire after 90 days unless the visitor’s browser accesses the
`
`same website.33 If that happens, the time resets, and another 90 days begins to accrue.34
`
`31.
`
`The Facebook Tracking Pixel uses both first- and third-party cookies. A first-
`
`party cookie is “created by the website the user is visiting”—i.e., HGTV.35 A third-party cookie
`
`is “created by a website with a domain name other than the one the user is currently visiting”—
`
`i.e., Facebook.36 The _fbp cookie is always transmitted as a first-party cookie. A duplicate _fbp
`
`cookie is sometimes sent as a third-party cookie, depending on whether the browser has recently
`
`logged into Facebook.
`
`32.
`
`Facebook, at a minimum, uses the fr, _fbp, and c_user cookies to link to Facebook
`
`IDs and corresponding Facebook profiles.
`
`33.
`
`A Facebook ID is personally identifiable information. Anyone can identify a
`
`Facebook profile—and all personal information publicly listed on that profile—by appending the
`
`Facebook ID to the end of Facebook.com.
`
`
`31 See FACEBOOK, COOKIES & OTHER STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES,
`https://www.facebook.com/policy/cookies/.
`32 Confirmable through developer tools.
`33 See FACEBOOK, COOKIES & OTHER STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES,
`https://www.facebook.com/policy/cookies/.
`34 Also confirmable through developer tools.
`35 PC MAG, FIRST-PARTY COOKIES, https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/first-party-
`cookie. This is confirmable by using developer tools to inspect a website’s cookies and track
`network activity.
`36 PC MAG, THIRD-PARTY COOKIES, https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/third-party-
`cookie. This is also confirmable by tracking network activity.
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`34.
`
`Through the Facebook Tracking Pixel’s code, these cookies combine the
`
`identifiers with the event data, allowing Facebook to know, among other things, what HGTV
`
`videos a user has watched.37
`
`35.
`
`HGTV also uses “Automatic Advanced Matching.” When activated, the
`
`Facebook Tracking Pixel “look[s] for recognizable form field and other sources on your website
`
`that contain information such as first name, last name and email.” 38 The Facebook Tracking
`
`Pixel’s code collect[s] that information, “along with the event, or action, that took place.”39 This
`
`information is “hashed,”40 meaning it is “[a] computed summary of digital data that is a one-way
`
`process.”41 In other words, it “cannot be reversed back into the original data.”42
`
`36.
`
`HGTV discloses this information so it can better match visitors to their Facebook
`
`profiles, which thereby allows HGTV to better track analytics and target its advertisements:
`
`Figure 13
`
`
`37 FACEBOOK, GET STARTED, https://developers.facebook.com/docs/meta-pixel/get-started.
`38 https://www.facebook.com/business/help/611774685654668?id=1205376682832142
`39 FACEBOOK, ABOUT ADVANCED MATCHING FOR WEB,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/611774685654668?id=1205376682832142.
`40 DEFINITION OF HASH, https://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/hash
`41 Id.
`42 Id.
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 13 of 25
`
`37.
`
`HGTV’s Facebook Tracking Pixel is configured to scan form fields containing a
`
`user’s email, first name, last name, gender, phone number, city, state, and zip code:43
`
`Figure 14
`
`
`
`38.
`
`Every individual who subscribes to HGTV’s newsletter must input an email
`
`address.
`
`Figure 15
`
`
`
`
`
`39.
`
`HGTV discloses a subscriber’s email address whenever they input it into the form
`
`field.
`
`40.
`
`HGTV knows Facebook will match the Advanced Matching parameters with a
`
`subscriber’s subsequent activity, thereby helping HGTV “[i]ncrease the number of attributed
`
`
`43 Facebook provides a corresponding look-up table: FACEBOOK, ADVANCED MATCHING,
`https://developers.facebook.com/docs/meta-pixel/advanced/advanced-matching.
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 14 of 25
`
`
`
`conversions,” “[i]ncrease [its] Custom Audience size,” and “[d]ecrease the cost per
`
`conversion.”44
`
`41.
`
`HGTV also discloses to Facebook that an individual has subscribed to the
`
`newsletter in the first place.
`
`Figure 16
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`
`44 FACEBOOK, ABOUT ADVANCED MATCHING FOR WEB,
`https://www.facebook.com/business/help/611774685654668?id=1205376682832142.
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 15 of 25
`
`
`
`42.
`
`After providing their email address, subscribers must select each newsletter
`
`they’d like to receive.
`
`Figure 16
`
`
`
`43.
`
`The principal purpose of the newsletter is to drive traffic to HGTV’s website.
`
`The overwhelming amount of content featured in the newsletter links back to articles and videos
`
`on hgtv.com.
`
`Figure 17
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 16 of 25
`
`
`
`
`
`44.
`
`By subscribing to HGTV’s newsletter, Plaintiffs subscribed to “goods or services
`
`from a video tape service provider.” 18 U.S.C. § 2710.
`
`45.
`
`By compelling a visitor’s browser to disclose the Advanced Matching parameters
`
`alongside event data for videos, HGTV knowingly discloses information sufficiently permitting
`
`an ordinary person to identify a specific individual’s video viewing behavior.
`
`46.
`
`By compelling a visitor’s browser to disclose the c_user cookie alongside event
`
`data for videos, HGTV knowingly discloses information sufficiently permitting an ordinary
`
`person to identify a specific individual’s video viewing behavior.
`
`47.
`
`By compelling a visitor’s browser to disclose the fr and _fbp cookies alongside
`
`event data for videos, HGTV discloses information sufficiently permitting an ordinary person to
`
`identify a specific individual’s video viewing behavior.
`
`48.
`
`By compelling a visitor’s browser to disclose the fr cookie and other browser
`
`identifiers alongside event data for videos, HGTV discloses information sufficiently permitting
`
`an ordinary person to identify a specific individual’s video viewing behavior.
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 17 of 25
`
`
`
`49.
`
`Facebook confirms that it matches activity on HGTV with a user’s profile.
`
`Facebook allows users to download their “off-site activity,” which is a “summary of activity that
`
`businesses and organizations share with us about your interactions, such as visiting their apps or
`
`websites.”45 Here, the off-site activity report confirms HGTV identifies an individual’s video
`
`viewing activities:
`
`Figure 18
`
`50.
`
`The “ID” shown here is the same Facebook Pixel ID visible in the first image.
`
`The Facebook Pixel ID is a numerical code that uniquely identifies each Pixel.46 In practice, this
`
`means HGTV’s Facebook Tracking Pixel has a Pixel ID that differs from all other websites. All
`
`subscribers who view videos on hgtv.com can pull their off-site activity report and see the same
`
`Pixel ID.
`
`III.
`
`Experience of Plaintiff Crystal Carter
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`In 2010, Plaintiff Carter created a Facebook account.
`
`From 2018 to February 2022, Plaintiff Carter enrolled in Defendant’s newsletter.
`
`During that same time period, Plaintiff Carter watched videos on hgtv.com. Defendant disclosed
`
`
`45 FACEBOOK, WHAT IS OFF-FACEBOOK ACTIVITY?,
`https://www.facebook.com/help/2207256696182627. As discussed there, the Off-Facebook
`Activity is only a “summary” and Facebook acknowledges “receiv[ing] more details and activity
`than what appears in your Facebook activity.” What is more, it omits “information we’ve
`received when you’re not logged into Facebook, or when we can’t confirm that you’ve
`previously used Facebook on that device.”
`46 FACEBOOK, GET STARTED, https://developers.facebook.com/docs/meta-pixel/get-started.
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 18 of 25
`
`
`
`her event data, which recorded and disclosed the video’s title and content, along with every time
`
`Plaintiff Carter paused a video, played a video, started a video, or completed a video.
`
`53. When Plaintiff Carter first subscribed, she entered her email address. Defendant
`
`then disclosed this identifier to Facebook, along with her Facebook ID and other identifying
`
`information, like identifiers for her browser.
`
`54. When Plaintiff Carter watched videos on hgtv.com, Defendant disclosed event
`
`data to Facebook, knowing Facebook would combine that data with the identifiers. By doing so,
`
`HGTV disclosed Plaintiff Carter’s PII to a third-party.
`
`55.
`
`Plaintiff Carter discovered that HGTV surreptitiously collected and transmitted
`
`her personally identifiable information in February 2022.
`
`IV.
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`Experience of Plaintiff Susan Cifelli
`
` In 2010, Plaintiff Cifelli created a Facebook account.
`
`In approximately 2010, Plaintiff Cifelli enrolled in Defendant’s newsletter. Since
`
`then, Plaintiff Cifelli has watched videos on hgtv.com. Defendant disclosed her event data,
`
`which recorded and disclosed the video’s title and content, along with every time Plaintiff Cifelli
`
`paused a video, played a video, started a video, or completed a video.
`
`58.
`
` When Plaintiff Cifelli first subscribed, she entered her email address. Defendant
`
`then disclosed this identifier to Facebook, along with her Facebook ID and other identifying
`
`information, like identifiers for her browser.
`
`59. When Plaintiff Cifelli watched videos on hgtv.com, Defendant disclosed event
`
`data to Facebook, knowing Facebook would combine that data with the identifiers. By doing so,
`
`HGTV disclosed Plaintiff Cifelli’s PII to a third-party.
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 19 of 25
`
`
`
`60.
`
`Plaintiff Cifelli discovered that HGTV surreptitiously collected and transmitted
`
`her personally identifiable information in February 2022.
`
`V.
`
`61.
`
`62.
`
`Experience of Plaintiff Letitia Taylor
`
` In or around 2007, Plaintiff Taylor created a Facebook account.
`
`From approximately 2019 to 2021, Plaintiff Taylor enrolled in Defendant’s
`
`newsletter. During that same time period, Plaintiff Taylor watched videos on hgtv.com.
`
`Defendant disclosed her event data, which recorded and disclosed the video’s title and content,
`
`along with every time Plaintiff Taylor paused a video, played a video, started a video, or
`
`completed a video.
`
`63. When Plaintiff Taylor first subscribed, she entered her email address. Defendant
`
`then disclosed this identifier to Facebook, along with her Facebook ID and other identifying
`
`information, like identifiers for her browser.
`
`64. When Plaintiff Taylor watched videos on hgtv.com, Defendant disclosed event
`
`data to Facebook, knowing Facebook would combine that data with the identifiers. By doing so,
`
`HGTV disclosed Plaintiff Taylor’s PII to a third-party.
`
`65.
`
`Plaintiff Taylor discovered that HGTV surreptitiously collected and transmitted
`
`her personally identifiable information in February 2022.
`
`PARTIES
`
`66.
`
`Plaintiff Carter is, and has been at all relevant times, a resident of New York, New
`
`York and has an intent to remain there, and is therefore a domiciliary of New York.
`
`67.
`
`Plaintiff Cifelli is, and has been at all relevant times, a resident of Vernon, New
`
`Jersey and has an intent to remain there, and is therefore a domiciliary of New Jersey.
`
`68.
`
`Plaintiff Taylor is, and has been at all relevant times, a resident of Georgetown,
`
`19
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 20 of 25
`
`
`
`Delaware and has an intent to remain there, and is therefore a domiciliary of Delaware.
`
`69.
`
`Defendant Discovery Communications, LLC is a Delaware corporation with its
`
`principal place of business at 230 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10001. Defendant
`
`develops, owns, and operates hgtv.com, which is used throughout New York and the United
`
`States.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`70.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1331 because it arises under a law of the United States (the VPPA).
`
`71.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant’s
`
`principal place of business is in New York, New York.
`
`72.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because a substantial
`
`part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
`
`CLASS ALLEGATIONS
`
`73.
`
`Class Definition: Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of similarly situated
`
`individuals defined as all persons in the United States who have a Facebook account, subscribed
`
`to HGTV’s newsletter, and viewed videos on HGTV’s website (the “Class”).
`
`74.
`
`Subject to additional information obtained through further investigation and
`
`discovery, the above-described Class may be modified or narrowed as appropriate, including
`
`through the use of multi-state subclasses.
`
`75.
`
`Numerosity (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(1)): At this time, Plaintiffs do not know the
`
`exact number of members of the aforementioned Class. However, given the popularity of
`
`Defendant’s website, the number of persons within the Class is believed to be so numerous that
`
`joinder of all members is impractical.
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 21 of 25
`
`
`
`76.
`
`Commonality and Predominance (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(2), 23(b)(3)): There is
`
`a well-defined community of interest in the questions of law and fact involved in this case.
`
`Questions of law and fact common to the members of the Class that predominate over questions
`
`that may affect individual members of the Class include:
`
`(a) whether Defendant collected Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s PII;
`
`(b) whether Defendant unlawfully disclosed and continues to disclose its
`users’ PII in violation of the VPPA;
`
`
`(c) whether Defendant’s disclosures were committed knowingly; and
`
`(d) whether Defendant disclosed Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s PII without
`consent.
`
`77.
`
`Typicality (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(3)): Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of those of
`
`
`
`the Class because Plaintiffs, like all members of the Class, used HGTV’s website to watch
`
`videos, and had their PII collected and disclosed by Defendant.
`
`78.
`
`Adequacy (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(4)): Plaintiffs have retained and are represented
`
`by qualified and competent counsel who are highly experienced in complex consumer class
`
`action litigation, including litigation concerning the VPPA and its state-inspired offspring.
`
`Plaintiffs and their counsel are committed to vigorously prosecuting this class action. Moreover,
`
`Plaintiffs are able to fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the Class.
`
`Neither Plaintiffs nor their counsel have any interest adverse to, or in conflict with, the interests
`
`of the absent members of the Class. Plaintiffs have raised viable statutory claims or the type
`
`reasonably expected to be raised by members of the Class, and will vigorously pursue those
`
`claims. If necessary, Plaintiffs may seek leave of this Court to amend this Class Action
`
`Complaint to include additional representatives to represent the Class, additional claims as may
`
`be appropriate, or to amend the definition of the Class to address any steps that Defendant took.
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 22 of 25
`
`
`
`79.
`
`Superiority (Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3)): A class action is superior to other
`
`available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy because individual
`
`litigation of the claims of all members of the Class is impracticable. Even if every member of
`
`the Class could afford to pursue individual litigation, the court system could not. It would be
`
`unduly burdensome to the courts in which individual litigation of numerous cases would
`
`proceed. Individualized litigation would also present the potential for varying, inconsistent or
`
`contradictory judgments, and would magnify the delay and expense to all parties and to the court
`
`system resulting from multiple trials of the same factual issues. By contrast, the maintenance of
`
`this action as a class action, with respect to some or all of the issues presented herein, presents
`
`few management difficulties, conserves the resources of the parties and of the court system and
`
`protects the rights of each member of the Class. Plaintiffs anticipate no difficulty in the
`
`management of this action as a class action.
`
`CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`COUNT I
`VIOLATION OF THE VIDEO PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT
`18 U.S.C. § 2710, et seq.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference the allegations contained in all
`
`80.
`
`preceding paragraphs of this complaint.
`
`81.
`
`Plaintiffs bring this claim individually and on behalf of the members of the
`
`proposed Class against Defendant.
`
`82.
`
`Defendant is a “video tape service provider” because it creates, hosts, and delivers
`
`hundreds of videos on its website, thereby “engag[ing] in the business, in or affecting interstate
`
`or foreign commerce, of rental, sale, or delivery of prerecorded video cassette tapes or similar
`
`audio visual materials.” 18 U.S.C. § 2710(a)(4). In particular, Defendant solicits individuals to
`
`22
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02031-PGG Document 1 Filed 03/11/22 Page 23 of 25
`
`
`
`subscribe to their newsletter that advertises and promotes videos and articles on its website,
`
`hgtv.com.
`
`83.
`
`Plaintiffs and members of the Class are “consumers” because they subscribed to
`
`HGTV’s newsletter. 18 U.S.C. § 2710(a)(1).
`
`84.
`
`HGTV disclosed to a third party, Facebook, Plaintiffs’ and the Class members’
`
`personally identifiable information. HGTV utilized the Facebook Tracking Pixel to compel
`
`Plaintiffs’ web browser to transfer Plaintiffs’ identifying information, like their Facebook ID,
`
`along with Plaintiffs’ event data, like the title of the videos they viewed.
`
`85.
`
`86.
`
`Plaintiffs and the Class members viewed video clips using HGTV’s website.
`
`HGTV knowingly disclosed Plaintiffs’ PII because it used that data to build
`
`audiences on Facebook and retarget them for its advertising campaigns.
`
`87.
`
`Plaintiffs and Class members did not provide Defendant with any form of
`
`consent—either written or otherwise—to disclose their PII to third parties.
`
`88.
`
`Nor were Defendant’s disclosures made in the “ordinary course of business” as
`
`the term is defined by the VPPA. In particular, HGTV’s disclosures to Facebook were not
`
`necessary for “debt collection activities, order fulfillm