throbber
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NASSAU
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`SARAH
`
`RODRIGUEZ,
`
`Index
`Date
`
`No.:
`Filed:
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against
`
`-
`
`SMA
`ABBAS
`
`DISTRIBUTORS,
`DASTGIR
`
`LLC.,
`and SONY
`
`KAMIANI
`DASTGIR
`
`INC.
`
`and
`
`(individually),
`
`Plaintiffs
`Nassau
`
`designate
`as the
`place
`
`the County
`of
`trial.
`
`of
`
`Venue
`place
`
`is based
`of business.
`
`on
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`principal
`
`Defendants.
`
`SUMMONS
`
`TO THE ABOVE
`
`NAMED
`
`DEFENDANT:
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`
`SUMMONED
`
`to serve
`
`upon
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`attorneys
`
`an answer
`
`to the
`
`complaint
`
`in this
`
`action
`
`within
`
`30 days
`
`after
`
`service
`
`of
`
`this
`
`summons.
`
`In
`
`case
`
`of
`
`your
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`answer,
`
`judgment
`
`will
`
`be taken
`
`against
`
`you
`
`by
`
`default
`
`for
`
`the
`
`relief
`
`demanded
`
`in the
`
`complaint.
`
`Dated:
`
`July
`
`24,
`
`2020
`
`VIRGINIA
`
`& AMBINDER,
`
`LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/
`Leonor
`Esq.
`H. Coyle,
`Esq.
`Michele
`Moreno,
`Esq.
`Alanna
`Sakovits,
`7th FlOOr
`40 Broad
`Street,
`New York
`New York,
`10004
`943-9080
`(212)
`Icoyle@vandallp.com
`
`Attorneys
`
`for
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`TO:
`
`LLC.
`
`New York
`
`11768
`
`SMA Distributors,
`Lane
`15 Stirrup
`Fort
`Salonga,
`
`Kamiani,
`
`Inc.
`
`1 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`366 N Broadway,
`New York
`Jericho,
`and/or
`911 Montauk
`Hwy.,
`New York
`
`Bayport,
`
`314,
`
`Suite
`11753
`
`11705
`
`Dastgir
`Abbas
`Lane
`15 Stirrup
`Fort
`Salonga,
`
`Dastgir
`Sony
`15 Stirrup
`Fort
`Salonga,
`
`Lane
`
`New York
`
`11768
`
`New York
`
`11768
`
`2 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NASSAU
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`SARAH
`
`RODRIGUEZ,
`
`- against
`
`-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`SMA
`ABBAS
`
`DISTRIBUTORS,
`DASTGIR
`
`LLC.,
`and SONY
`
`KAMIANI
`DASTGIR
`
`INC.
`
`and
`
`(individually),
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Sarah
`
`Rodriguez
`
`("Plaintiff"),
`
`by
`
`her
`
`attorneys,
`
`Virginia
`
`& Ambinder,
`
`LLP
`
`alleges
`
`upon
`
`knowledge
`
`as to herself
`
`and
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief
`
`as to all
`
`other
`
`matters
`
`as
`
`follows:
`
`PRELIMINARY
`
`STATEMENT
`
`1.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`is brought
`
`against
`
`SMA DISTRIBUTORS,
`
`LLC.,
`
`KAMIANI
`
`INC.
`
`and
`
`ABBAS
`
`DASTGIR
`
`and SONY
`
`DASTGIR
`
`("Defendants")
`
`to recover
`
`for
`
`violations
`
`of
`
`the New
`
`York
`
`State
`
`Human
`
`Rights
`
`Law,
`
`Executive
`
`Law
`
`§ 296
`
`et
`
`seq.
`
`(hereinafter
`
`"NYSHRL")
`
`for
`
`actual
`
`or
`
`wrongfully
`
`discriminating
`
`and
`
`retaliating
`
`against
`
`Plaintiff
`
`based
`
`on
`
`her
`
`perceived
`
`disability
`
`and
`
`for
`
`requesting
`
`reasonable
`
`accommodations,
`
`and
`
`for
`
`damages
`
`for
`
`failure
`
`to provide
`
`proper
`
`wage
`
`statements
`
`pursuant
`
`to New
`
`York
`
`Law
`
`§§
`
`198-1(d)
`
`and
`
`195(3)
`
`(hereinafter
`
`"NYLL").
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`initiated
`
`this
`
`action
`
`seeking
`
`loss
`
`of
`
`past
`
`and
`
`future
`
`earnings,
`
`compensatory
`
`damages,
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`interest,
`
`attorneys'
`
`fees,
`
`and
`
`costs.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`AND VENUE
`
`Venue
`
`herein
`
`is proper
`
`as Defendant
`
`conducts
`
`business
`
`in Nassau
`
`County.
`
`This
`
`Court
`
`has jurisdiction
`
`over
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`pursuant
`
`to the NYSHRL
`
`and CPLR
`

`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`301.
`
`1
`
`3 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`PARTIES
`
`5.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Sarah
`
`Rodriguez,
`
`is a female
`
`who
`
`is currently
`
`a resident
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of
`
`New York
`
`and who
`
`was
`
`formerly
`
`employed
`
`by Defendants.
`
`6.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`SMA Distributors,
`
`LLC.,
`
`is a New York
`
`corporation
`
`registered
`
`to do business
`
`in New York,
`
`with
`
`a principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`in
`
`15 Stirrup
`
`Ln,
`
`Fort
`
`Salonga,
`
`New York
`
`11768.
`
`7.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Kamiani,
`
`Inc.,
`
`is a New York
`
`corporation
`
`registered
`
`to do business
`
`in New York,
`
`with
`
`a principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`in 366 N Broadway,
`
`Suite
`
`314,
`
`Jericho,
`
`New York
`
`11753
`
`and/or
`
`911 Montauk
`
`Hwy.,
`
`Bayport,
`
`New York
`
`11705.
`
`8.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Abbas
`
`Dastgir
`
`is a resident
`
`of
`
`15 Stirrup
`
`Ln,
`
`Fort
`
`Salonga,
`
`New York
`
`11768,
`
`and
`
`at all
`
`relevant
`
`times
`
`was
`
`an officer,
`
`director,
`
`and/or
`
`owner
`
`of Defendant
`
`Corporations.
`
`9.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Sony
`
`Dastgir
`
`is a resident
`
`of
`
`15 Stirrup
`
`Ln,
`
`Fort
`
`Salonga,
`
`New York
`
`11768,
`
`and
`
`at all
`
`relevant
`
`times
`
`was
`
`an officer,
`
`director,
`
`and/or
`
`owner
`
`of Defendant
`
`Corporations.
`
`10.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`Defendants
`
`employed
`
`more
`
`than
`
`4 employees
`
`during
`
`all
`
`relevant
`
`times,
`
`and was Plaintiff's
`
`employer
`
`as defined
`
`under
`
`the NYSHRL.
`
`11.
`
`Defendants
`
`were
`
`responsible
`
`for
`
`the
`
`firing
`
`and
`
`hiring
`
`of Plaintiff,
`
`and
`
`controlled
`
`the
`
`terms
`
`and
`
`conditions
`
`of
`
`her
`
`employment
`
`including
`
`her
`
`rate
`
`of
`
`pay,
`
`schedule,
`
`promotions,
`
`discipline,
`
`and
`
`raises.
`
`STATEMENT
`
`OF FACTS
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`worked
`
`for Defendants,
`
`performing
`
`work
`
`as sales
`
`associate
`
`and
`
`eventually
`
`as a manager
`
`from
`
`approximately
`
`March
`
`2017
`
`until
`
`she was
`
`terminated
`
`on or about May
`
`1, 2020.
`
`2
`
`4 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`relevant
`
`times,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`an employee
`
`of Defendants.
`
`Individual
`
`Defendants
`
`Abbas
`
`and
`
`Sony
`
`Dastgir
`
`directed
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in her work
`
`and
`
`paid
`
`Plaintiff
`
`her wages.
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`qualified
`
`for
`
`her
`
`position
`
`and was
`
`recognized
`
`and
`
`promoted
`
`by
`
`her
`
`employers
`
`and Defendant's
`
`customers
`
`for
`
`her
`
`exceptional
`
`work
`
`performance.
`
`16.
`
`On or
`
`around
`
`April
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`symptoms
`
`of
`
`the Novel
`
`18,
`
`2020,
`
`experiencing
`
`Covid-19
`
`virus
`
`(hereinafter
`
`"the
`
`virus")
`
`during
`
`the
`
`course
`
`of performing
`
`her
`
`job
`
`responsibilities
`
`for Defendants.
`
`During
`
`this
`
`time,
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`step-father,
`
`who
`
`lives
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`tested
`
`positive
`
`for
`
`the
`
`virus.
`
`17.
`
`On or around
`
`April
`
`18, 2020,
`
`pursuant
`
`to Governor
`
`Cuomo's
`
`March
`
`22,
`
`2020 New
`
`York
`
`State
`
`on Pause
`
`Executive
`
`Order
`
`(hereinafter
`
`the
`
`"Order"),
`
`Plaintiff
`
`advised
`
`Defendant
`
`Dastgir
`
`as
`
`required
`
`the
`
`Order.
`
`Abbas
`
`that
`
`she
`
`would
`
`be
`
`staying
`
`home
`
`to
`
`quarantine
`
`by
`
`Subsequently,
`
`on or about
`
`April
`
`25,
`
`2020,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`advised
`
`Defendant
`
`Abbas
`
`Dastgir
`
`that
`
`she had
`
`indeed
`
`tested
`
`positive
`
`for
`
`the
`
`virus
`
`and would
`
`be continuing
`
`to quarantine
`
`as per
`
`the Order.
`
`18.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`during
`
`her mandatory
`
`quarantine,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`kept
`
`Defendants
`
`informed
`
`of
`
`the
`
`status
`
`of her
`
`health.
`
`further
`
`explained
`
`to defendants
`
`that
`
`she was
`
`required
`
`to test negative
`
`19.
`
`Ms. Rodriguez
`
`twice
`
`before
`
`being
`
`able
`
`to return
`
`to work,
`
`pursuant
`
`to the Order.
`
`20.
`
`Ms.
`
`Rodriguez
`
`followed
`
`all
`
`quarantine
`
`requirements
`
`and
`
`kept
`
`Defendants
`
`informed
`
`of
`
`the
`
`progress
`
`of
`
`her
`
`illness.
`
`On May
`
`1, 2020,
`
`Ms.
`
`Rodriguez
`
`communicated
`
`and
`
`coordinated
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Abbas
`
`Dastgir
`
`the picking
`
`up of her
`
`paycheck,
`
`as well
`
`as her
`
`request
`
`for
`
`the
`
`corresponding
`
`paystub,
`
`which
`
`she required
`
`for
`
`insurance
`
`purposes.
`
`3
`
`5 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`21.
`
`On May
`
`1, 2020,
`
`Ms.
`
`Rodriguez
`
`picked
`
`up
`
`her
`
`check
`
`from
`
`Defendant
`
`Abbas
`
`Dastgir,
`
`in person,
`
`however
`
`she did
`
`not
`
`receive
`
`the
`
`requested
`
`corresponding
`
`paystub.
`
`22.
`
`On Saturday
`
`May
`
`2, 2020,
`
`Ms. Rodriguez
`
`informed
`
`Defendants
`
`that
`
`she had
`
`twice
`
`tested
`
`negative
`
`for COVID-19,
`
`and
`
`consequently
`
`she would
`
`be returning
`
`to work
`
`the
`
`following
`
`Wednesday
`
`May
`
`6, 2020.
`
`to Plaintiff's
`
`communication
`
`that
`
`she would
`
`be back
`
`to work
`
`23.
`
`Defendants
`
`response
`
`upon
`
`testing
`
`negative
`
`for
`
`the virus,
`
`was
`
`that Defendants
`
`had
`
`"already
`
`arranged
`
`new
`
`help"
`
`and
`
`that
`
`Defendant
`
`Abbas
`
`Dastgir
`
`"wished
`
`her
`
`luck".
`
`24.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`condition,
`
`having
`
`experienced
`
`the
`
`symptoms
`
`and
`
`subsequently
`
`tested
`
`positive
`
`for Covid-19,
`
`qualifies
`
`as a disability
`
`under
`
`the NYSHRL.
`
`25.
`
`Firing
`
`Ms.
`
`Rodriguez
`
`for
`
`falling
`
`ill with
`
`COVID-19
`
`and
`
`adhering
`
`to the
`
`required
`
`her
`
`behavior
`
`retaliation.
`
`quarantine
`
`subjected
`
`to discriminatory
`
`and
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`discharge
`
`was
`
`undertaken
`
`in
`
`retaliation
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`falling
`
`ill with
`
`Covid-19
`
`and
`
`quarantining
`
`as
`
`required
`
`by Governor
`
`Cuomo's
`
`March
`
`22,
`
`20202
`
`Order,
`
`and
`
`because
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`status
`
`as a person
`
`with
`
`a disability
`
`and/or
`
`perceived
`
`disability.
`
`27.
`
`Defendants
`
`unlawful
`
`acts
`
`have
`
`caused
`
`Ms.
`
`Rodriguez
`
`to
`
`suffer
`
`severe
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`high
`
`stress
`
`embarrassment
`
`and
`
`humiliation.
`
`including
`
`experiencing
`
`fear,
`
`levels,
`
`anxiety,
`
`This
`
`experience
`
`resulted
`
`in Ms. Rodriguez
`
`experiencing
`
`debilitating
`
`insomnia.
`
`28.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`the
`
`individual
`
`Defendants
`
`were
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`employers
`
`throughout
`
`her
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendant
`
`Corporations.
`
`29.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`accommodation
`
`requests
`
`were
`
`reasonable
`
`and
`
`posed
`
`no undue
`
`burden
`
`to
`
`Defendants.
`
`30.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`treated
`
`less well
`
`because
`
`of her
`
`actual
`
`and/or
`
`perceived
`
`disability.
`
`4
`
`6 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`31.
`
`Defendant
`
`discriminated
`
`against
`
`Plaintiff
`
`on
`
`the
`
`basis
`
`of
`
`her
`
`disability
`
`and/or
`
`perceived
`
`disability.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`Defendant
`
`failed
`
`to provide
`
`a reasonable
`
`accommodation
`
`for Plaintiff.
`
`Defendant
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`engage
`
`in
`
`a good
`
`faith
`
`interactive
`
`dialogue
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to
`
`assess
`
`her
`
`needs
`
`and
`
`the
`
`reasonableness
`
`of her
`
`accommodation
`
`requests.
`
`34.
`
`Defendant
`
`retaliated
`
`against
`
`Plaintiff
`
`for making
`
`a reasonable
`
`accommodation
`
`request
`
`and
`
`for
`
`her
`
`complaints
`
`that
`
`the
`
`accommodations
`
`were
`
`not
`
`being
`
`adhered
`
`to.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`Defendant
`
`unlawfully
`
`terminated
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`employment.
`
`During
`
`the
`
`relevant
`
`time,
`
`Defendants
`
`did
`
`not
`
`always
`
`issue
`
`and/or
`
`allow
`
`Plaintiff
`
`access
`
`to statements
`
`with
`
`each
`
`payment
`
`of her wages
`
`that
`
`listed
`
`the
`
`accurate
`
`number
`
`of hours
`
`they
`
`worked,
`
`their
`
`rate
`
`of pay,
`
`allowances
`
`the Defendants
`
`have
`
`claimed,
`
`as
`
`or any
`
`may
`
`purportedly
`
`required
`
`by NYLL
`
`§ 195(3)
`
`37.
`
`Numerous
`
`times
`
`during
`
`her
`
`employment,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`unable
`
`to view
`
`and/or
`
`obtain
`
`wage
`
`statements
`
`from
`
`Defendants,
`
`despite
`
`repeated
`
`requests
`
`38.
`
`Defendant's
`
`unlawful
`
`actions
`
`have
`
`resulted
`
`in
`
`significant
`
`physical
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`including
`
`increased
`
`headaches,
`
`migraines,
`
`dizziness,
`
`weakness,
`
`fatigue,
`
`nausea,
`
`distress,
`
`anxiety,
`
`stress,
`
`and
`
`embarrassment.
`
`a result
`
`of
`
`39.
`
`As
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Defendant
`
`has
`
`violated
`
`the NYSHRL
`
`and NYLL.
`
`FIRST
`DISABILITY
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`DISCRIMINATION
`
`AGAINST
`UNDER
`
`DEFENDANTS:
`THE NYSHRL
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`re-alleges
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in the preceding
`
`paragraphs.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to
`
`the NYSHRL,
`
`it
`
`is
`
`unlawful
`
`"[flor
`
`an
`
`employer,
`
`because
`
`of
`
`an
`
`individual's
`
`...
`
`disability
`
`...
`
`to
`
`discharge
`
`from
`
`employment
`
`such
`
`individual
`
`or
`
`to
`
`discriminate
`
`5
`
`7 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`against
`
`such
`
`individual
`
`in
`
`compensation
`
`or
`
`in terms,
`
`conditions
`
`or privileges
`
`of
`
`employment."
`
`NYSHRL
`
`§ 296(1)(a).
`
`42.
`
`Further,
`
`it
`
`is
`
`"unlawful
`
`discriminatory
`
`practice
`
`for
`
`an
`
`employer
`
`...
`
`to
`
`refuse
`
`to
`
`provide
`
`reasonable
`
`accommodations
`
`to the known
`
`disabilities
`
`... of an employee
`
`...
`
`in connection
`
`with
`
`a
`
`job"
`
`unless
`
`it
`
`"can
`
`be demonstrated
`
`to impose
`
`an undue
`
`hardship
`
`on the
`
`operation
`
`of
`
`an
`
`...
`
`program
`
`or
`
`enterprise."
`
`NYSHRL
`
`and
`
`(b).
`
`employer's
`
`business,
`
`§ 296(3)(a)
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`Defendants
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`actual
`
`or perceived
`
`disability.
`
`Defendants
`
`engaged
`
`in an unlawful
`
`discriminatory
`
`practice
`
`by
`
`treating
`
`her
`
`less well
`
`because
`
`of
`
`her
`
`actual
`
`or
`
`perceived
`
`disability,
`
`failing
`
`to
`
`provide
`
`Plaintiff
`
`with
`
`a reasonable
`
`accommodation
`
`for
`
`her
`
`actual
`
`or perceived
`
`disability,
`
`failing
`
`to engage
`
`in a good
`
`faith
`
`interactive
`
`process
`
`with
`
`Plaintiff
`
`about
`
`her
`
`reasonable
`
`accommodation
`
`requests,
`
`and
`
`ultimately
`
`terminating
`
`her
`
`due
`
`to her
`
`actual
`
`or perceived
`
`disability
`
`and
`
`in retaliation
`
`for
`
`her
`
`accommodation
`
`requests.
`
`45.
`
`Defendant's
`
`actions
`
`were
`
`undertaken
`
`in conscious
`
`disregard
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`rights
`
`and
`
`violate
`
`the NYSHRL.
`
`46.
`
`By
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`reasons,
`
`Defendant
`
`is
`
`liable
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`to
`
`be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`for
`
`all
`
`damages
`
`permitted
`
`under
`
`the
`
`law
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to
`
`back
`
`front
`
`attorneys
`
`and
`
`costs.
`
`compensatory
`
`damages,
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`pay,
`
`pay,
`
`interest,
`
`fees,
`
`SECOND
`
`AGAINST
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`DEFENDANTS:
`UNDER
`THE NYSHRL
`RETALIATION
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`re-alleges
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`above.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to
`
`the NYSHRL,
`
`Executive
`
`Law
`
`§ 296(7),
`
`"[i]t
`
`shall
`
`be
`
`an
`
`unlawful
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`discriminatory
`
`practice
`
`for
`
`any
`
`person
`
`engaged
`
`in
`
`any
`
`activity
`
`to which
`
`this
`
`section
`
`applies
`
`to
`
`retaliate
`
`or discriminate
`
`against
`
`any
`
`person
`
`because
`
`he or she has opposed
`
`any
`
`practices
`
`forbidden
`
`6
`
`8 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`under
`
`this
`
`article
`
`or because
`
`he or she has
`
`filed
`
`a complaint,
`
`testified
`
`or assisted
`
`in any
`
`proceeding
`
`under
`
`this
`
`article."
`
`49.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`engaged
`
`in protected
`
`activity
`
`under
`
`the NYSHRL
`
`by making
`
`reasonable
`
`accommodation
`
`requests
`
`given
`
`her
`
`disability
`
`having
`
`contracted
`
`the Novel
`
`Covid-19
`
`Virus
`
`during
`
`the
`
`course
`
`of
`
`her
`
`employment
`
`with
`
`Defendants,
`
`and
`
`thus
`
`being
`
`required
`
`to
`
`quarantine
`
`for
`
`a
`
`of
`
`the March
`
`2020 New York
`
`Pause
`
`Executive
`
`Order.
`
`determinate
`
`amount
`
`time
`
`as per
`
`22,
`
`50.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`was
`
`aware
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`protected
`
`activity
`
`and
`
`her
`
`status
`
`as a person
`
`with
`
`a disability
`
`and/or
`
`perceived
`
`disability.
`
`51.
`
`Defendant
`
`undertook
`
`an adverse
`
`employment
`
`action
`
`against
`
`Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`refusing
`
`to
`
`accommodate
`
`her
`
`requests,
`
`by
`
`refusing
`
`to
`
`engage
`
`in
`
`a good
`
`faith
`
`interactive
`
`process
`
`to
`
`assess
`
`need
`
`for
`
`and
`
`her
`
`employment
`
`for
`
`her
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`accommodations,
`
`ultimately
`
`terminating
`
`reasonable
`
`requests.
`
`52.
`
`Defendant's
`
`adverse
`
`employment
`
`actions
`
`were
`
`taken
`
`against
`
`Plaintiff
`
`because
`
`she
`
`requested
`
`reasonable
`
`accommodations
`
`for
`
`her
`
`disability,
`
`and
`
`because
`
`she
`
`complained
`
`about
`
`Defendant's
`
`refusal
`
`to adhere
`
`to the
`
`accommodations.
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`Defendant's
`
`conduct
`
`was
`
`done
`
`in conscious
`
`disregard
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`rights.
`
`By
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`reasons,
`
`Defendant
`
`is
`
`liable
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`to
`
`be
`
`all
`
`under
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`for
`
`damages
`
`permitted
`
`the
`
`law
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`damages,
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`back
`
`pay,
`
`front
`
`pay,
`
`interest,
`
`attorneys
`
`fees,
`
`and
`
`costs.
`
`THIRD
`NEW YORK
`
`AGAINST
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`TO PROVIDE
`- FAILURE
`
`DEFENDANTS:
`WAGE STATEMENTS
`
`55.
`
`56.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`reallege
`
`and
`
`incorporate
`
`reference
`
`all
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`above.
`
`by
`
`Pursuant
`
`to NYLL
`
`§§
`
`198-1(d)
`
`and
`
`195(3)
`
`and
`
`12 NYCRR
`
`§ 146-2.2
`
`and
`
`2.3,
`
`an
`
`7
`
`9 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`employer
`
`is required
`
`to provide
`
`its employee
`
`with
`
`a paystub
`
`that
`
`accurately
`
`reflects
`
`the rate
`
`of pay,
`
`the
`
`hours
`
`worked
`
`and
`
`the
`
`amounts
`
`deducted.
`
`The
`
`paystubs
`
`must
`
`include:
`
`the
`
`employee's
`
`rate
`
`or
`
`rates
`
`of pay;
`
`the
`
`overtime
`
`rate
`
`of pay,
`
`if
`
`the
`
`employee
`
`is subject
`
`to overtime
`
`regulations;
`
`the
`
`basis
`
`of wage
`
`payment
`
`(per
`
`hour,
`
`per
`
`shift,
`
`per week,
`
`piece
`
`rate,
`
`commission,
`
`etc.);
`
`allowances
`
`the
`
`any
`
`employer
`
`intends
`
`to
`
`claim
`
`as
`
`part
`
`of
`
`the minimum
`
`wage
`
`including
`
`tip,
`
`meal,
`
`and
`
`lodging
`
`allowances;
`
`the
`
`regular
`
`pay
`
`day;
`
`the
`
`employer's
`
`name
`
`and
`
`any
`
`names
`
`under
`
`which
`
`the
`
`employer
`
`does
`
`business
`
`(DBA);
`
`the
`
`physical
`
`address
`
`of
`
`the
`
`employer's
`
`main
`
`office
`
`or principal
`
`place
`
`of
`
`business
`
`and,
`
`if different,
`
`the
`
`employer's
`
`mailing
`
`address
`
`; and
`
`the
`
`employer's
`
`telephone
`
`number.
`
`57.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`did
`
`not
`
`receive
`
`and/or
`
`have
`
`access
`
`to paystubs
`
`each week
`
`that
`
`she worked.
`
`By
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`reasons,
`
`Defendants
`
`have
`
`violated
`
`NYLL
`
`§§
`
`198-1(d)
`
`and
`
`195(3)
`
`and
`
`12 NYCRR
`
`§ 146-2.2
`
`and
`
`2.3
`
`and
`
`are liable
`
`to the Plaintiff
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`plus
`
`liquidated
`
`damages,
`
`interest,
`
`attorneys'
`
`fees
`
`and
`
`costs
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`demands
`
`judgment:
`
`on her
`
`first
`
`of action
`
`against
`
`Defendant
`
`in an amount
`
`at
`
`(1)
`
`cause
`
`trial,
`
`plus
`
`attorneys'
`
`fees
`
`and
`
`costs;
`
`to be determined
`
`(2)
`
`on her
`
`second
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`against
`
`Defendant,
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`plus
`
`attorneys'
`
`fees
`
`and
`
`costs;
`
`(3)
`
`on her
`
`third
`
`cause
`
`of action
`
`against
`
`Defendant,
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`plus
`
`attorneys'
`
`fees
`
`and
`
`costs;
`
`(4)
`
`such
`
`other
`
`and
`
`further
`
`relief
`
`the Court
`
`deems
`
`just
`
`and
`
`proper.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York
`New York,
`2020
`23,
`July
`
`8
`
`10 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/24/2020 12:30 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 607537/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/24/2020
`
`& AMBINDER,
`
`LLP
`
`Leonor
`H. Coye,
`Moreno,
`
`H. Coy_le
`
`Esq.
`
`Esq.
`
`VIRGINIA
`
`By:
`
`__/s/
`
`Leonor
`
`Michele
`
`Alanna
`
`Esq.
`Sakovits,
`7th FlOOr
`St.,
`New York
`
`40 Broad
`New York,
`943-9080
`(212)
`Icoyle@vandallp.com
`
`10004
`
`Attorneys
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff
`
`9
`
`11 of 11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket