throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`
`X:NAV-M786\Appeal
`MAC/rf
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`R'I'
`COURT
`OF THE
`OF NEW YORK
`—-------------
`TOWER INSURANCE
`39 REAL
`a/s/o
`532
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`—---------
`COMPANY
`
`—-----X
`—------
`—-------
`OF NEW YORK
`
`fY,
`
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against
`
`-
`
`hidex
`
`No.:
`
`150281/11
`
`No'I'IC.;I:,'
`NOTICE
`
`OF AWBAL
`
`I MW.I.,MW ENGINBERING
`GROUP,
`REAI.
`SHINE
`JIEM[NG
`.III.',MIN(J
`WANG,
`KUANG
`STONE
`PANE
`ZHI
`YU,
`INC'
`SHIMING
`SHIMING
`THAM,
`INC.,
`YONG CONSTRUCTION,
`P.C., HENG
`STONE
`CONSTRUCTION,
`ENC.,
`
`LLC
`
`INC.,
`FY,
`CONSTRUCTION,
`TAM ARCHITECT,
`METAL
`INC.,
`JOHN
`
`and
`
`MSU,
`
`Defendants.
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-------X
`
`C O U N S E L :
`
`I'l.,l',ASI,'
`PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`that
`
`the
`
`defendant,
`
`METAL
`
`STONE
`
`CONSTRUCTION,
`
`INC.
`
`hereby
`
`appeals
`
`to the Appellate
`
`Division,
`
`First
`
`Department,
`
`27 Madison
`
`Avenue,
`
`New
`
`York,
`
`New York
`
`from
`
`an Order
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of New York,
`
`New York
`
`on March
`
`County
`
`(Honorable
`
`Erika
`
`M. Edwards)
`
`made
`
`in the
`
`above-entitled
`
`matter
`
`22,
`
`2018,
`
`and
`
`entered
`
`in the Office
`
`I'
`
`of
`
`the Clerk
`
`I'
`of New York
`
`County,
`
`on March
`
`27,
`
`2018,
`
`which
`
`Order
`
`denied
`
`defendant,
`
`ME"fAL
`
`STONE
`
`CONSTRUCTION,
`
`INC.'s
`
`post-trial
`
`motion
`
`to set aside
`
`the
`
`verdict
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`
`4404(a)
`
`and
`
`the
`
`post-trial
`
`motion
`
`by defendant
`
`PANE
`
`STONE
`
`(
`
`()NN'I'I<I.J(.
`
`I'ION
`
`IN(.',,
`
`to,.et
`
`isi(ic
`
`the
`
`ver(lict
`
`pursu,'int
`
`to C.',I'l,R
`
`l <0 I(;1),
`
`'I'hi,.
`
`apl>e
`
`il
`
`i,.
`
`1 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`
`taken
`
`from
`
`those
`
`parts
`
`of
`
`the Order
`
`which
`
`is adverse
`
`to defendant-appellant.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York,
`April
`4, 2018
`
`New York
`
`ESQ.
`& MOOR1.5
`
`MARK
`A. COLLESANO,
`McTIERNAN
`BARRY,
`for Defendant
`Attorneys
`MF FAL
`STONE
`CONSTRUCTION,
`-- 14d'
`Street
`Floor
`2 Rector
`Street
`101 Greenwich
`New York
`New York,
`313-3600
`(212)
`
`10006
`
`INC.
`
`TO:
`
`RUSSELL
`ESQ.
`G. MONACO,
`LAW OFFICES
`OF STEVEN
`Attorneys
`for Plaintiff
`28u'
`40 Wall
`Street,
`New York,
`New York
`File No.:
`TIC10S0188
`212-400-7154
`
`Floor
`10005
`
`G. FA(TfH,
`
`LLC
`
`SCHWAB
`LESTER
`KATZ
`for Defendants
`Anorneys
`STONE
`PANE
`and
`JOllN.JOI
`120 Broadway
`New York,
`212-964-6611
`
`New York
`
`10271
`
`& DWYER,
`
`LLP
`
`HSU
`
`GOGICK
`Attorneys
`SFHMING
`11.I
`Broadway,
`New York,
`212-422-9424
`
`& O'NEILL,
`BYRNE
`for Defendants
`SHIMING
`TAM,
`Room.kootn
`1560
`New York
`10004
`
`LLP
`
`TAM,
`
`ARCHITBCT,
`
`P.C.
`
`&<0 HENDERSON,
`RAWLE
`for Defendants
`Attorneys
`LMW ENGINEERING
`WANG
`and
`JIEMING
`271'' Floor
`14 Wall
`Street,
`New York
`New York,
`212-323-7070
`
`LI P
`
`GRCHJP,
`
`LLC
`
`10005-2101
`
`2 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`
`'I'();
`
`REALTY,
`SHINE
`No Appearance
`
`l.NC.
`
`KUANG
`ZHI
`No Appearance
`
`YU
`
`YONG CONSTRUCTION,
`HENG
`N 0 AppC<lf<lI1CC
`
`INC
`
`3 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NEW YORK
`CLERK
`/2018
`21
`03/27
`COUNTY
`03:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`[FILED:
`PM)
`NYSCEF
`DOC , NO,
`96
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`r Kt:>r'>< NO. .
`.1WEX
`150281/2011
`.'I.'.t
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`NYSCEF:Y!~u>'~'k~' 03/27/2018
`
`RECE1VED.t.
`
`5'.I.'
`()I'
`I.JR'I'
`IU:.'Ivl]:.'
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`OF NEW YORK
`COUN'IY
`
`................,s...ss...s..s.........
`......s.s...-..----......-.-.---.----------..-----..-................--..........-X
`of New York
`n/s/o
`
`Tower
`532
`
`Insurance
`39th REALTY
`.'><)
`
`Company
`LLC,
`
`'
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`agaiGSt..
`-aga.tt>8t-
`
`IndeX.No.;
`
`150281/11
`
`NOTICE
`
`OF ENTRY
`
`GROUP
`LLC,
`KUANG
`Z.HI
`YU,
`SFHMENG
`TNC.,
`FC, HENG
`.I'l.l,;N(:i
`STONE
`
`WANG,
`
`NC>'
`J1EMENG
`PANE
`TAM,
`YONG
`
`LMW ENGINEERING
`SHINE
`REAI
`INC.,
`IY,
`CO.NSTRUCTION
`STON.B
`.I'H,
`SHIMING
`,'>I-l]MIN(r
`TAM,
`ARCHITECT,
`Ivil..",.l'
`METAL
`CONSTRUCTION
`INC.,
`.IN(',
`and JOHN
`CO.NSTRUCTION
`TNC.
`
`HSU,
`
`Defendants.
`
`1>LT:.ANT:.'
`PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`that
`
`the within
`
`is a true
`
`copy
`
`of
`
`an Order
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Honorable
`
`Erika
`
`M. Edwards
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of New York
`
`for
`
`the
`
`County
`
`of New York,
`
`dated
`
`.M.arch
`
`22,
`
`2018
`
`and
`
`entered
`
`in the
`
`office
`
`of
`
`the Clerk
`
`of
`
`the County
`
`of New York
`
`on March
`
`27,
`
`2018.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York,
`March
`27,
`
`New York
`2018
`
`LAW OFFICE
`
`. OF STENEN
`
`G. FAUTH,
`
`LLC
`
`By:
`.13y:
`
`Esq.
`Floor
`
`York
`
`10005
`
`G. Monaco,
`Russell
`28*
`40 Wan Street,
`New York,.New
`400-7154
`
`(212)
`Attorneys
`
`for
`
`Plaintiff
`
`.I. D f> f.<>
`
`4 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`/27
`: 21
`2018
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`[FILED:
`03
`03
`PM)
`NYSCEF
`96
`NO..
`DOC.
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`INDEX
`NO.
`150281/2011
`
`.:I..:I.
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`RECEIVRD
`NYSCEP:
`03/27/2010
`
`TO:
`
`Katz & Dwyer,
`
`Schwalb
`Lester
`120 Broadway
`New York,
`Attmneysfor
`andJohn
`
`Hst/
`
`NY 10271
`.r
`Pane Stone Constrtraion
`
`Barry
`2 Rector
`New York,
`Attorneysjor
`,'Itfarrrl
`,it)1//Enrley
`
`McTiernan
`
`and Moore
`14th
`floor
`Street,
`
`.')treet,.'Iieet,
`NY 10006
`..I
`Meta/
`Stone Construction.
`
`!nc.
`
`4 Shiming
`Tam
`.S'himinglal)n)
`Shiming
`Dismissed
`from Case
`
`Iam.
`
`Architect,
`
`I'<.'I'(.'
`
`PC
`
`LMW Engineering
`Group
`Dismissed
`from Case
`
`LLC & Jieming
`
`Wang
`
`Shine
`.S'I)inc
`Realty,
`No Appearance
`
`Inc.
`
`Yu
`Zhi Kuang
`No Appearance
`
`(:>
`22 c>t:I:
`
`l()1 (1
`
`5 of 11
`
`

`

`.
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`: NEW YORK
`FILED
`COUNTY
`CLERK
`/ 27 / 2 018
`03
`B2
`: 3 2
`' DOC,'.
`DOC.
`NYSCEF
`NO.
`.
`96
`SUPREME
`
`COURT
`OF THE
`NEW YORK
`
`STATE
`COUNTY
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`mDEX
`NO.
`150281/2011
`..'I
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03 /27/2018
`
`.
`
`PMj
`
`PRESENT:
`.......................
`
`Hon.
`
`Paul A. Goetz.
`
`JSC
`
`Justice
`
`PET
`
`: 150281/2011
`Number
`Index
`TOWER INSURANCE
`COMPANY
`vs
`LMW ENGINEERING
`: 003
`Sequence Number
`.
`OTHER RELIEFS
`
`GROUP
`
`LLC
`
`OF
`
`INDEX NO..____,._
`
`MOTl0N DAT&,,_____
`„
`
`MOTION SEQ. No.
`
`_
`
`The following
`Notice
`of Motion/order
`
`, were read on this motion
`1 to
`papers,numbered
`to show Cause - Affidavits
`- Exhibits
`Exhibits
`
`Affidavits
`
`-
`
`Answering
`
`to/for
`
`....
`
`I No(s).
`
`t No(s). __
`
`____
`.
`................. ........................ ) No(s). ____,_
`
`DECIDED
`
`er-
`
`AS PER ATTACHED
`r-4~&'6
`
`prrLM
`
`DECISION
`
`AND ort0Eft
`
`DR<FD
`
`k(zz.
`
`((/
`
`Replying
`
`Affidavits
`
`Upon
`
`the foregoing
`
`papers,
`
`it
`
`is ordered
`
`that
`
`this motion
`
`is
`
`Dated:
`
`U)
`
`ZQ
`
`L'I
`
`u
`
`LLI
`
`u
`
`CO
`
`Z
`
`Q 0
`
`L CHECK ONE:
`
`...........,,.,,.......,..,............,,,,,,.,,,,,..................
`2. CHECK AS APPROPRIATE:
`
`.......-............,,....MOTION
`
`+
`
`'
`
`IS:
`
`CASE DISPOSED
`
`I
`
`GRANTED
`
`I
`
`DENIED
`
`.
`
`3. CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:
`
`..,,,,......,..................................,
`
`L.J
`
`SETTLE ORDER
`
`,
`
`J.S.Q,
`
`Hon.
`
`Paul A. Goetz.
`JSC
`) NON.FINAL
`DISPOSITION
`
`El GRANTED
`,'
`
`IN PART
`
`i-] OTHER
`
`] SUBMIT ORDER
`
`DO NOT POST
`
`(
`
`]FIDUCIARY
`
`APPOINTMENT
`
`C) REFERENCE
`
`'3l nr/,I ?6)
`
`6 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`NEW YORK
`FILED:
`NYsr:.'Ei'
`96
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`No.
`..
`.
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`2018
`
`m2
`
`: 2 2
`
`PM)
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK..
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`150281/2011
`:fNDEX
`NO. .
`.I.NDE)X
`
`RECE:rve:D
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`TOWER
`YORK
`
`OMPANY
`INSURANCE
`LLC,
`a/s/o
`532
`39 REALTY,
`
`OF NEW
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`150281/2011
`
`DECISION/ORDER
`
`-against-
`
`Motion
`
`Sequences:
`
`002
`
`and
`
`003
`
`JIEMING
`LMW ENGINEERING
`LLC,
`GROUP,
`ZHI KUANG YU,
`WANG SHINE
`REALTY,
`INC.,
`PANE STONE
`CONSTRUCTION,
`INC.,
`TAM ARCHITECT,
`SHIMING
`THAM,
`SHIMING
`P.C., HENG YONG CONSTRUCTION,
`INC.
`JOHN HSU,
`
`and
`
`Defendants.
`
`Recitation,
`
`as required
`
`by CPLR 2219(a),
`
`of
`
`JI
`the papers
`
`considered:in
`
`the
`
`review
`
`of
`
`motion'
`this motion:
`
`Papers
`and Affidavits/Affirmations/
`of Motion
`annexed
`of Law
`Affidavits/Affirmations
`
`and Memo
`
`Notice
`Memos
`Opposition
`of Law
`Reply
`Law
`
`annexed
`Affidavits/Affirmations/Memos
`annexed
`
`ERIKA
`
`M. EDWARDS,
`
`J.S.C.:
`./.Z
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Tower
`
`Insurance
`
`action
`
`Numbered
`
`1, 2
`
`3, 4
`
`5, 6
`
`of
`
`a/s/o
`
`brought
`
`this
`
`subrogation
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`recover
`money
`construction
`
`work
`
`Constroetion,
`for
`its insured's
`
`Inc.
`
`conducted
`before
`
`Stone
`
`Metal
`The
`2017.
`$449,627.15
`
`tried
`were
`rendered
`
`jury
`
`with
`
`Pane
`
`Stone
`
`being
`
`property
`on the adjacent
`a jury
`favor
`a verdict
`in Tower's
`75% responsible
`
`of New York
`Company
`Pane Stone
`against
`Defendants
`Stone"
`Stone"
`("("
`("Metal
`("collectively
`Stone")
`in 2008
`damage
`building.
`Tower's
`from September
`Defendants
`against
`Stone
`
`532
`39 Realty,
`Construction
`"Defendants"
`"Defendants"
`"Defendants"),
`by negligent
`claims
`against
`
`caused
`
`(" Tower"
`LLC ("Tower")
`Stone"
`Stone"
`("
`("Pane
`Stone"),
`to
`others
`
`and
`
`underpinning
`Stone
`Pane
`to October
`amount
`total
`25% responsible
`
`and
`
`4,
`of
`
`for
`
`15, 2017,
`in the
`
`being
`
`and Metal
`
`on various
`
`days
`
`Tower's
`
`loss.
`
`Both
`
`Defendants
`
`now move
`
`for
`
`an order
`
`4404(a).
`damages'
`
`Under
`because
`
`motion
`
`it was
`
`sequence
`against
`
`Pane
`
`002,
`the weight
`
`setting
`Stone moves
`the evidence,
`of
`
`the
`aside
`verdict,
`the jury's
`to set aside
`speculative.
`excessive
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`award
`of
`
`and
`
`Under
`
`3 Pane Stone listed
`
`the damages
`
`award
`
`at'
`at $4S2,127.15,
`
`but
`
`it was actually449,627.15.
`
`% c?ff:?a?
`
`7 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`NEW YORK
`FILED
`:
`,f!'
`79v,'>Cr!'
`..F',I"
`96
`DoC.
`NYSCEF
`NO,
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/ 27
`
`/ 2018
`
`23:32
`
`PM
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`DïDEX
`NO.
`150281/20U
`.1
`
`.:I..:I.
`scep.
`
`
`i'4i!'.C,.'I!'..I:Vf!.'l3NY!>C.'L'i";I/.C I,'IVf I)
`
`03/27/2010
`
`sequence
`
`Stone moves
`
`motion
`weight
`
`or
`
`law,
`moves
`$200,000
`motions
`the jury's
`
`liability
`
`003, Metal
`for
`the evidence,
`of
`for
`in the alternative,
`the jury's
`to set aside
`or
`to S238,000,
`and Pane Stone
`verdict
`
`an order
`an order
`damages
`in the alternative,
`opposed
`that Metal
`
`partially
`
`finding
`
`finding
`granting
`award
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`the jury's
`to set aside
`liability
`negligent
`not
`was
`Stone
`that Metal
`as to negligence.
`a new trial
`of $449.627.15
`to Tower,
`on damages.
`a new trial
`for
`as it pertained
`motion
`Stone's
`for Tower's
`was 25% liable
`
`verdict
`
`Metal
`
`as against
`as a matter
`also
`Stone
`the award
`to reduce
`or
`both
`opposes
`Tower
`to setting
`damages.
`
`the
`of
`
`to
`
`aside
`
`For
`
`the reasons
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein,
`
`the court
`
`denies
`
`Defendants'
`
`motions
`
`in their
`
`entirety.
`
`does
`Pane Stone
`the jury's
`substance
`that
`since
`it was
`speculative
`of damages
`true measure
`of
`actual
`cost
`insured's
`$200,000.
`
`solely
`should
`repair
`
`was
`
`apportionment
`the jury's
`dispute
`not
`the weight
`against
`was
`award
`damages
`opinion.
`and
`on estimates
`based
`on the evidence
`based
`have
`been
`and
`that
`$200,000
`
`of
`
`against
`
`liability
`the
`of
`evidence,
`Stone
`further
`Pane
`
`argues
`it, but
`and
`excessive
`that
`argues
`
`in
`
`the
`
`demonstrating
`the diminution
`
`the
`that
`of value
`
`was
`
`to $204,000
`
`verdict
`disputes
`the jury's
`Metal
`Stone
`because
`it only
`s744IJJlllllVV L~Nll aL ~xaamSaV ZaWV>~~WJ
`it had
`no liability
`substance
`that
`of Buildings.
`the New York
`Department
`City
`it had
`no supervisory
`at
`present
`the site,
`authority
`Shine
`insured.
`to Tower
`or
`its
`no duty
`it owed
`and
`performed.
`work
`was
`the underpinning
`and Pane
`contractor
`
`being
`hired
`
`Stone
`
`Heng
`
`Yong
`
`Shine
`Realty
`Construction
`
`It did
`
`I
`
`over
`
`argues
`
`that
`
`measure
`
`award
`
`which
`
`should
`was
`
`and damages.
`on liability
`which
`was
`filed
`the PW2,
`perform
`any work
`not
`the underpinning
`the owner
`was
`Realty
`hired
`Pane
`
`of
`Stone
`
`to perform
`
`the
`
`or
`
`underpinning
`
`Stone
`
`argues
`
`in
`
`permit
`
`for
`
`not
`
`Metal
`the work
`it was
`the site,
`at
`or subcontractor
`work
`where
`the property
`as its general
`work.
`
`also
`Metal
`to use the proper
`failed
`cost
`of
`the reasonable
`demonstrated
`evidence
`to repair
`work
`needed
`defense
`
`$23,500.
`diminution
`
`The
`in value
`
`the damages
`of damages
`Metal
`Stone
`insured
`Tower's
`at $20,000
`estimated
`
`repair.
`that
`the
`
`roof
`
`inflated
`
`because
`
`verdict
`
`should
`
`the court
`
`should
`
`on damages.
`
`it
`be set aside
`reduce
`the
`
`award
`
`experts
`to be $200,000.
`included
`some
`as against
`to $200,000
`
`Metal
`items
`which
`
`the weight
`
`and
`the repairs
`Stone
`
`Stone
`and Pane
`$200,000
`paid
`each
`$500
`
`be set aside
`the lesser
`of
`argue
`
`both
`the
`for
`seven
`
`for
`
`to be $204,000
`
`repairs,
`windows
`and
`
`the jury
`because
`or
`in value
`that
`the
`additional
`
`reduced
`diminution
`the
`in substance
`was
`there
`a total
`for
`$238,000
`
`expert's
`
`estimate
`
`of
`and
`
`the
`
`was
`damages
`
`costs
`
`claims
`
`Tower's
`that
`damaged.
`
`were
`of
`
`not
`the evidence
`
`Therefore,
`and
`because
`
`it was
`
`the jury's
`or
`excessive
`a new trial
`
`to $238,000,
`
`or
`
`in the alternative,
`
`order
`
`permits
`
`judgment
`
`CPLR 4404(a)
`that
`and
`direct
`it can
`order
`of
`
`thereon
`law or
`
`interest
`as determined
`
`justice,
`
`by
`
`a new
`
`or where
`court
`
`the
`
`trial
`
`cannot
`4404[a]).
`
`court
`a trial
`be entered
`verdict
`where
`the
`the jury
`(CPLR
`
`a jury
`to set aside
`in favor
`of a party
`to the weight
`is contrary
`together
`kept
`after
`being
`
`verdict
`
`entitled
`
`or any
`as a matter
`to judgment
`the evidence,
`for
`a reasonable
`
`judgment
`
`entered
`
`of
`
`of
`
`in the
`time
`
`agree
`
`is permitted
`court
`The
`of
`the
`the weight
`factors"
`of many
`
`is against
`
`balancing
`
`a verdict
`to set aside
`"involves
`and
`it
`v HaHmark
`
`evidence
`(Cohen
`
`and order
`what
`
`Cards,
`
`Inc.,
`
`a new trial
`part
`is in large
`45 NY2d
`
`493,
`
`the jury's
`where
`a discretionary
`{l 978]
`499
`
`verdict
`
`[internal
`
`2
`
`Q<9 af'~f2 XDi<a
`
`8 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`NEW YORK
`FILED:
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`No.
`96
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`03
`
`/27
`
`/2018
`
`m2
`
`: 32
`
`PM|
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`INDEX
`NO.
`150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2010
`
`omitted]).
`
`For
`
`citations
`by sufficient
`evidence,
`of
`no valid
`line
`simply
`to the conclusion
`(people]
`irrational
`not be utterly
`that
`conclude
`
`the verdict
`
`quotation
`
`and citation
`
`a court
`court
`the
`
`and
`
`that
`to determine
`that
`must
`find
`permissible
`reasoning
`the jury"
`reached
`by
`the result
`to reach
`a jury
`for
`law not
`of
`is as a matter
`omitted]).
`
`of
`
`is a question
`upon
`evidence"
`
`it has determined
`supported
`the
`
`by
`
`verdict
`law a jury
`as a matter
`presented
`based
`on the evidence
`which
`could
`inferences
`(id.).
`If
`there
`
`is not
`at
`
`supported
`'
`
`is
`
`there
`trial,
`rational
`lead
`and
`"it would
`
`may
`
`not
`
`possibly
`of
`fact
`. . the court
`[internal
`
`.
`
`(id.
`
`It
`for
`
`requires
`
`to view
`the court
`the
`to assume
`the movant
`party,
`and to grant
`all
`favorable
`inferences
`Kornblum
`v Intset
`
`where
`
`the evidence
`facts
`testified
`
`376
`
`in the light most
`to by
`the prevailing
`from the evidence
`to the
`[1976]).
`Judgment
`
`favorable
`
`to the
`prevailing
`witnesses
`to be true
`(see S.
`
`party
`
`party's
`
`prevailing
`
`the
`
`the
`
`Co.
`Metals
`is not
`appropriate
`
`Ctnp.,
`issues
`
`the
`to be accorded
`[1" Dept
`
`700
`
`699,
`
`testimony
`1972]).
`
`verdict
`weight
`
`AD2d
`
`flowing
`38 NY2d
`of
`credibility
`are within
`the province
`
`are involved
`of
`
`notwithstanding
`and
`as matters
`of
`credibility
`the jury
`( Bodlovich
`v Carucci,
`
`38
`
`When
`
`determines
`
`that
`
`applying
`the jury's
`
`legal
`
`these
`verdict
`
`to the evidence
`and
`damages
`
`evidence
`that Metal
`
`the court
`and
`Stone
`was
`
`law,
`
`principles
`on liability
`to set aside
`the motions
`denies
`not
`negligent
`as a matter
`of
`
`at
`presented
`was
`not
`against
`f'
`a new
`for
`the jury's
`
`the court
`trial,
`the weight
`
`of
`
`the
`
`for
`trial,
`damages
`
`an order
`award.
`
`the
`or
`
`verdict,
`to reduce
`
`Defendants
`
`failed
`
`to demonstrate
`
`that
`
`Here,
`the evidence
`could
`not
`ample
`
`by
`have
`
`showing
`reached
`
`its
`
`the jury's
`verdict
`so greatly
`preponderated
`evidence
`the
`that
`interpretation
`conclusion
`on any
`of
`verdict
`
`was
`
`against
`
`in their
`
`favor
`
`that
`
`of
`
`the
`
`of Tower
`
`based
`
`the jury's
`
`fair
`in favor
`
`Stone
`
`to Metal
`
`Stone
`
`and
`
`the jury's
`
`damages
`
`the weight
`the jury
`there was
`to Pane
`
`evidence.
`Here,
`on 75% liability
`in the
`amount
`
`of
`
`the
`
`reasonable
`the jury
`why
`to substantiate
`
`inferences
`
`appeared
`
`to
`
`liability
`
`and
`
`award
`and
`
`of
`the witnesses
`is easy
`submitted
`
`to understand
`by Tower
`
`to support
`evidence
`and 25% liability
`$449,627.15.
`After
`considering
`drawn
`from the evidence
`in favor
`the
`and
`
`the
`credibility
`of Tower,
`evidence
`
`it
`
`documentary
`
`credit
`
`damages.
`
`testimony
`
`As noted
`
`Tower
`
`by both
`on the evidence
`which
`signed
`by a Metal
`Stone
`As
`the
`
`and Pane
`
`Stone,
`that Metal
`
`revealed
`
`the jury
`Stone
`
`found
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`the application
`
`filed
`
`to be 25% liable
`f'
`for
`the work
`
`permit,
`
`employee
`
`who
`
`listed Metal
`Metal
`
`Stone
`Stone
`
`as the
`
`construction
`
`was
`
`required
`
`to conduct
`
`based
`
`it was
`
`superintendent.
`
`construction
`the work,
`
`superintendent,
`underpinning.
`
`including
`
`daily
`
`site visits
`
`to supervise
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`The
`
`was
`not
`
`site
`
`hired
`
`engineer
`testified
`paid
`by Metal
`Stone,
`the underpinning
`performing
`and a representative
`came
`
`also
`
`listed
`was
`in substance
`
`as the client
`he had
`that
`by Metal
`work
`
`Stone
`
`each
`
`time.
`
`properly,
`He believed
`
`on the engineer's
`a long-term
`and whenever
`he called
`
`Metal
`
`support
`
`of excavation
`
`Metal
`
`Metal
`
`Stone
`
`was
`
`with
`Stone,
`relationship
`he saw that
`sub-contractor
`the
`a supervisor
`Stone
`to send
`contractor
`the
`general
`
`plans.
`that
`
`he
`was
`
`to the
`
`for
`
`the foundation
`
`underpinning
`
`work
`work.
`
`and
`
`that Metal
`
`Stone
`
`was
`
`required
`
`to contact
`
`him prior
`
`to the
`
`start
`
`of
`
`the
`
`3
`
`81 orrf:
`
`Ie)
`
`9 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`FILED
`NEW YORK
`:
`ii.'i,','iI
`DoC.
`NO
`96
`NYSCEF
`
`03
`
`/ 27
`
`/ 2018
`
`13
`
`: 3 f71vi]
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`1502 8-1,/2011
`INDEX
`NO .
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`03/27/2018
`
`Additionally,
`interrelated
`and
`
`address
`
`significantly
`the same
`
`the
`
`have
`
`evidence
`as they
`the
`
`that Metal
`demonstrated
`by the same
`are owned
`employees.
`same
`
`Stone
`
`and Pane
`share
`
`they
`
`are
`
`Stone
`the same
`
`office,
`
`have
`
`person,
`
`on the evidence,
`Based
`at
`claim.
`the damages
`to settle
`expert's
`based
`on their
`amount
`was
`the damaged
`the cost
`of
`the insured's
`the insured
`did
`mortgage
`to avoid
`the money
`dealt
`with
`
`trial.
`
`Tower
`presented
`
`Tower
`
`to repair
`expert
`not
`
`detailed
`property.
`after
`
`It
`
`to repair
`he
`
`fees
`
`and
`
`The
`he still
`is still
`even
`after
`
`not
`
`his
`off
`concerns.
`
`and
`and
`attorney
`all
`the money
`use
`problems
`additional
`building's
`outstanding
`legal
`to pay
`He used
`company.
`on repairs
`that
`safety
`primarily
`that
`yet
`completed
`repairs,
`necessary
`the building
`that
`He said
`and a staircase.
`that
`in substance
`and windows.
`He stated
`condition
`to its pre-accident
`original
`condition.
`
`this
`estimate
`with
`
`that
`
`some
`
`of
`
`from
`
`its
`
`testified
`parties
`$449,627.15
`
`all
`insured
`that
`evidence
`an itemized
`
`and
`after
`negotiating
`evidence
`revealed
`
`experts
`Damages
`it paid
`demonstrated
`that
`and testimonial
`documentary
`the premises
`of
`inspection
`reached
`was a compromise
`depreciation.
`The
`deducting
`the
`off
`paid
`the property,
`his mortgage
`was having
`$200,000
`then
`spent
`approximately
`that
`in substance
`testified
`to repair
`the roof,
`windows,
`the doors
`with
`are problems
`and there
`not
`will
`still
`the building
`are made,
`be replaced
`and corniches
`can
`never
`that
`in substance
`engineer
`testified
`is in continuing
`over
`to shift
`
`but
`with
`
`insured
`needed
`
`level
`all
`repairs
`the facade
`structural
`
`incident
`
`cracks
`
`because
`to grow
`
`the
`building
`and the building
`Defendants'
`
`not
`he had
`capstones
`
`all
`
`be restored
`to their
`the repair
`structural
`
`time.
`
`costs
`
`increased
`
`decline
`
`and
`
`from
`erosion
`
`of
`
`Additionally,
`the date
`caused
`which
`
`because
`Tower's
`the initial
`the
`
`experts
`list
`
`conduct
`
`a detailed
`needed
`
`inspection
`
`of
`
`the
`
`As Tower
`nor
`
`argues,
`provide
`
`did
`they
`to its pre-accident
`
`Tower
`
`that
`
`claims
`were
`not
`
`premises,
`premises
`by others.
`defense
`reasonable
`
`not
`did
`of estimated
`based
`
`largely
`its experts
`or expert
`
`repairs
`their
`conclusions
`
`to restore
`on reports
`
`the
`prepared
`
`over
`builders.
`
`the defense
`Based
`
`because
`experts
`on the evidence,
`over
`evidence
`
`the
`
`the
`it was
`
`They
`credited
`engineers
`
`Tower's
`
`testimonial
`
`and
`
`documentary
`
`an itemized
`condition.
`the jury
`structural
`experts
`to credit
`the jurors
`for
`presented
`by Defendants.
`
`evidence
`
`within
`
`As mentioned
`the province
`Defendants
`
`of
`
`the evidence,
`permissible
`
`inferences
`
`issues
`
`above,
`the jury
`failed
`which
`
`of credibility
`be a basis
`cannot
`and
`to demonstrate
`that
`rational
`could
`
`lead
`possibly
`amount
`in the total
`claims
`25% held
`to be liable
`
`and
`
`the weight
`to set aside
`there
`is simply
`jurors
`to conclude
`with
`of $449,627.15,
`for
`such
`damages.
`
`to be given
`a verdict.
`no valid
`
`are
`
`to testimony
`Therefore,
`of
`line
`reasoning
`that Defendants
`
`based
`
`on
`and
`
`Pane
`
`Stone
`
`held
`
`to
`
`were
`
`not
`
`liable
`
`be 75% liable
`
`for Tower's
`and Metal
`
`Stone
`
`Therefore,
`
`the court
`
`denies
`
`Defendants'
`
`motions
`
`in their
`
`entirety
`
`with
`
`prejudice.
`
`As
`
`such,
`
`it
`
`is hereby
`
`ORDERED
`the verdict
`
`that
`the
`as to damages
`and
`it
`is further
`
`costs;
`
`aside
`without
`
`Defendant
`denies
`court
`sequence
`under motion
`
`Pane
`002
`
`Construction's
`Stone
`in its entirety
`
`with
`
`motion
`prejudice
`
`to set
`and
`
`4
`
`'i! ) <b.'fl'.:18'i
`
`10 of 11
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2018 03:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99
`CLERK
`: 32
`/ 2018
`FILED
`COUNTY
`NEW YORK
`/ 27
`03
`B2
`:
`PM)
`
`.DOC.C.' NO.
`(~'
`94
`NY5CEF
`.
`
`INDEX NO. 150281/2011
`
`NO.
`150281/2011
`INDEX
`.'I
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2018
`NY$CEF:
`03/27/2018
`
`RECEIVED
`
`ORDERED
`the court
`denies
`on liability
`and
`verdict
`the jury's
`aside
`and without
`prejudice
`with
`in its entirety
`
`that
`
`Defendant
`damages
`costs.
`
`Date: March
`
`22,
`
`2018
`
`Metal
`for
`
`Construction's
`Stone
`relief
`under
`motion
`other
`
`and
`
`to set
`motion
`003
`sequence
`
`H N.
`
`-.',RlK.A M,
`
`',1?WARDS
`
`r
`
`9~ gi:I::Icn
`
`11 of 11
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket