throbber
Motion Seq. 003
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`-------------------------------------------------------------------X Case No.: 1:25-cv-1265
`JENNIFER AN,
`
` Plaintiff
`
`
`-against-
`
`KANYE WEST a/k/a YE, individually,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`AFFIRMATION OF
`JESSE S. WEINSTEIN, ESQ.
`IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
`OPPOSITION TO DISMISS
`PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`
`-------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`JESSE S. WEINSTEIN , ESQ ., an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court ,
`hereby affirms the following to be true under penalty of perjury:
`1. I am an attorney with Arcé Law Group, P.C., counsel of record for Plaintiff Jenifer An in the
`above-captioned action. I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this case
`through my legal representation of Plaintiff.
`2. I submit this Affirmation in opposition to Defendant Kanye West a/k/a Ye’s (“West”) Motion
`to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) and (g), and
`Civil Rights Law §§ 70 -a and 76 -a (Motion Seq. 003), and specifically to authenticate and
`introduce into the record the exhibits attached hereto.
`3. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a sworn affidavit, executed under penalty
`of perjury, from Liz Martins, Eleanor Jackson’s (“La Roux”) make-up artist who was present
`on set during the filming of the “In for the Kill” music video, and personally witnessed
`Defendant West’s conduct toward Plaintiff.
`4. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from a confidential investigative
`report prepared by Beau Dietl & Associates, dated October 18, 2024, summarizing its
`interview with “In for the Kill” music video Director, Geremy Jasper.
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 07:01 PM INDEX NO. 152284/2025
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
`1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`5. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from a confidential investigative
`report prepared by Beau Dietl & Associates, dated October 18, 2024, summarizing its
`interview with “In for the Kill” music video First Assistant Director, John Mintz.
`6. Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a sworn affidavit, executed under penalty
`of perjury, from Michelle An, the current President of Creative Strategy at Interscope , a
`division of UMG Recordings, Inc. Ms. An, a Production Manager at the time, was present on
`set during the filming of the “In for the Kill” music video, and personally witnessed Defendant
`West’s conduct.
`7. Attached as Exhibit E are Instagram messages between Ms. Jackson and Plaintiff, where Ms.
`Jackson and Plaintiff discuss Defendant West’s conduct toward Plaintiff on set during the
`filming of the “In for the Kill” music video.
`8. Exhibits A through E are offered to demonstrate that Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint
`is supported by a substantial basis in law, as required under CPLR 3211(g), and to corroborate
`the factual allegations set forth therein.
`9. For the reasons set forth in Plaintiff ’s accompanying Memorandum of Law in Opposition,
`Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court deny Defendant ’s Motion to Dismiss in its
`entirety and grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
`10. I affirm the foregoing under penalty of perjury pursuant to CPLR § 2106.
`Dated: New York, New York
`March 10, 2026
` Respectfully submitted,
`Arcé Law Group, P.C.
`
`/s/_Jesse S. Weinstein____
`Jesse S. Weinstein, Esq.
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`45 Broadway, Suite 2810
`New York, New York 10006
`T: (212) 248-0120
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 07:01 PM INDEX NO. 152284/2025
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026
`2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket