throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`_____________________________________________X
`
`TAIDGH BARRON,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`- against –
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.:
`
`COMPLAINT
`Jury Trial Demand
`
`
`NEW YORK POST and NEWS CORP,
`
`
`
`____________________________________________X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Taidgh Barron, by and through his attorneys, Rubin Employment Law, brings
`
`this Complaint against New York Post (“The Post”) and News Corp (collectively, “Defendants”)
`
`and alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`Barron brings this action based on Defendants’ violation of New York Labor Law
`
`§740 in conjunction with their violations of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of
`
`1970 (“OSHA”).
`
`2.
`
`Defendants violated the “general duty clause” of OSHA when they failed to
`
`provide Barron and other Post photographers and reporters with adequate personal protective
`
`equipment (“PPE”) to protect against the transmission of the deadly COVID-19 virus while
`
`covering the pandemic in New York City, thus creating a danger to Barron, to all other Post
`
`employees, and to the general public with whom they came into contact.
`
`3.
`
`Defendants also violated OSHA when they failed to provide Barron and other
`
`Post photographers and reporters with PPE to protect against injury while covering the Black
`
`Lives Matter protests in New York City, which turned into riots and looting.
`
`1 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`4.
`
`As such, Defendants violated New York Labor Law §740 when they terminated
`
`Barron’s employment in retaliation for his complaints about lack of sufficient coronavirus PPE
`
`and lack of any civil unrest PPE.
`
`THE PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`Plaintiff Taidgh Barron is an individual residing in New York County, New York,
`
`5.
`
`residing within the jurisdiction of this Court.
`
`6.
`
`At all times relevant to the Complaint, Defendant New York Post employed
`
`Barron at its office and principal place of business in New York County, New York, also within
`
`the jurisdiction of this Court.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant The Post, a daily tabloid newspaper in New York City ranked as the
`
`fourth largest newspaper in the United States by circulation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
`
`Defendant News Corp, whose principal place of business also is located in New York County,
`
`New York.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Jurisdiction of this Court is proper pursuant to CPLR § 301.
`
`Venue for this action in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, is
`
`proper pursuant to CPLR § 503 (a) and New York Labor Law § 740 (4)(b).
`
`10.
`
`At all times relevant to this action, Barron was an “Employee” within the meaning
`
`of New York Labor Law § 740 (1)(a).
`
`11.
`
`At all times relevant to this action, either the Post or News Corp or both
`
`Defendants were “Employer[s]” within the meaning of New York Labor Law § 740 (1)(b).
`
`12.
`
`At all times relevant to this action, Chris Dougherty, Post director of
`
`photography, was a Post “Supervisor” within the meaning of New York Labor Law § 740 (1)(f).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`Barron’s Employment with The Post
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`13.
`
`Barron began working for The Post as a staff photographer in or about September
`
`2019.
`
`14.
`
`Barron invested significant time and effort to secure the highly competitive
`
`position of staff photographer for The Post. He obtained a New York Police Department Press
`
`Credential, became a member of the New York Press Photographers Association and gained
`
`experience by working the streets for four years.
`
`15.
`
`Barron’s qualifications impressed The Post, and his supervisors made it clear
`
`from the beginning that they were grooming him to be a long-term employee. The Post gave
`
`Barron opportunities and training consistent with its intention to employ him on a long-term
`
`basis.
`
`16.
`
`On Barron’s first day on the job, the head and associate photo editors sent him
`
`out, along with veteran staff photographer Tamara Beckwith, to cover a lawsuit. Beckwith did
`
`not normally photograph these types of assignments, but The Post wanted Barron to receive the
`
`benefit of her training and guidance.
`
`17.
`
`A month later, the two photo editors sent Barron to Manhattan Criminal Court for
`
`one week to be trained by longtime Post freelance court photographer Steven Hirsch. Hirsch
`
`taught Barron the rules of photographing in court, how to scope out news in court photography
`
`and how to catch people in the building to secure information and photos.
`
`18.
`
`On October 24, 2019, The Post sent Barron to Hoboken, New Jersey to cover a
`
`makeup artist who had found drugs and paraphernalia in her latest shipment of beauty supplies
`
`from Sephora. David Rentas, head photo editor, explained to Barron that he wanted him to
`
`become familiar with filing an expense report on an out-of-state assignment to prepare him for
`
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`more long-distance assignments. Rentas told Barron to be prepared to travel to more out-of-state
`
`assignments.
`
`19.
`
`On November 4, 2019, The Post sent Barron to Washington, D.C. with a reporter
`
`to stake out the Ukraine whistleblower. The Post did not use its standard practice of hiring a
`
`local freelancer, because it wanted to provide Barron with valuable training.
`
`20.
`
`After returning from D.C., Barron suggested to Rentas that he obtain a White
`
`House Hard Pass to enable him to cover President Donald Trump during the upcoming election.
`
`Rentas told Barron that this was a great idea, and he would work on it. Clearly, Rentas expected
`
`that Barron would still be with The Post during the election season.
`
`21.
`
`Rentas also made it clear to Barron that he wanted him to work every holiday
`
`possible during his first year at The Post to gain experience working important annual events.
`
`Barron Reports Dangers
`Posed by Coronavirus and Requests PPE
`
`
`22.
`
`COVID-19.
`
`On January 24, 2020, The Post reported on the United States’ first case of
`
`23.
`
`On or about January 24, 2020, The Post assigned Barron to cover Halpern’s
`
`Pharmacy, because it was already running out of face masks. About one week later, the manager
`
`of the pharmacy told Barron that a person working for Reuters had purchased all of the face
`
`masks in the store for Reuters employees. On that same date, The Post reported that Mayor Bill
`
`de Blasio said the coronavirus would reach NYC “sooner rather than later.”
`
`24.
`
`On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the virus a global
`
`health emergency.
`
`25.
`
`On January 31, 2020, The Post reported on the first-known NYC resident to be
`
`tested on suspicion of contracting COVID-19.
`
`
`
`4
`
`4 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`26.
`
`Barron immediately understood the gravity of the situation. He knew that the
`
`introduction and spread of a dangerous virus in a densely populated metropolis like NYC posed a
`
`great risk to all of its residents.
`
`27.
`
`On or about February 6, 2020, Barron reported to his supervisor, Chris
`
`Dougherty, director of photography, that he required PPE to protect himself and others from
`
`contracting the coronavirus. Dougherty denied Barron’s request.
`
`28.
`
`One week later, on February 13, 2020, The Post ran an article titled, “Coronavirus
`
`can be spread by people who don’t show symptoms, CDC warns.” The story reported that the
`
`director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said, “What I’ve learned in the last
`
`two weeks is that the spectrum of this illness is much broader than was originally presented.
`
`There’s much more asymptomatic illness.”
`
`29.
`
`On or about February 20, 2020, Barron again met with Dougherty and requested
`
`PPE a second time. Again, Dougherty did not take Barron’s request seriously and advised him
`
`that The Post would not provide him with PPE of any kind.
`
`30.
`
`Only six days later, The Post ran a story titled, “New York needs more masks
`
`amid coronavirus outbreak.” In that article, The Post reported, “Many pharmacies across the Big
`
`Apple told The Post that they have been sold out of masks for weeks — or can’t keep up with
`
`demand.”
`
`31.
`
`On March 12, 2020, The Post printed an article (with an accompanying
`
`photograph Barron took) criticizing “Mayor Bill de Blasio and his public health team” for
`
`stressing that, “though the coronavirus is certainly contagious, the mechanics of transmission are
`
`relatively limited.” The article reported,
`
`The claim that the coronavirus dies quickly upon exposure to the
`atmosphere is striking; it also seems to contradict information elsewhere.
`The World Health Organization says that the novel coronavirus appears to
`
`
`
`5
`
`5 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`behave similarly to related viruses and “may persist on surfaces for a few
`hours or up to several days.” A recent article in the Journal of Hospital
`Infection suggests that, depending on the surface material, it can remain
`infectious for up to nine days.
`
`
`32.
`
`The next day, on March 13, 2020, The Post reported, “Spread of coronavirus
`
`‘much worse’ than Ebola, expert claims.” The article stated, in part, “The global spread of the
`
`coronavirus is ‘much, much worse’ than seen with Ebola – which, unlike COVID-19, ‘requires
`
`very close contact for transmission’ according to the professor who helped discover the earlier
`
`illness.”
`
`33.
`
`Four days later, on March 17, 2020, The Post ran an article titled “86% of people
`
`with coronavirus are walking around undetected, study says.”
`
`34. Meanwhile, without providing Barron with the requested PPE, The Post continued
`
`to require him to cover stories that put him at an even higher risk than most people of contracting
`
`and spreading the virus.
`
`35.
`
`On multiple days, The Post assigned Barron to ride the subways to determine the
`
`impact of the virus in that setting. Barron took photographs of transit workers and riders wearing
`
`protective masks and of police officers requiring homeless people to leave the cars and stations
`
`to prevent the virus from spreading.
`
`36.
`
`The Post repeatedly sent Barron to Bellevue Hospital to photograph: (1) new
`
`morgue construction necessitated by the pandemic; and (2) the transport of corpses whose deaths
`
`resulted from COVID-19.
`
`37.
`
`On March 24, 2020, The Post assigned Barron to cover the press conference that
`
`Patrick Foye, chairman and chief executive officer of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
`
`(“MTA”), held at MTA Headquarters. The only photographer at the event, Barron was required
`
`
`
`6
`
`6 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`to be within close proximity of Foye, who was not wearing a mask. The next day, Foye tested
`
`positive for the coronavirus.
`
`38.
`
`Three days later, Barron expressed his concern to The Post associate photo editor
`
`about his encounter with Foye. The editor asked Barron whether he had physically touched
`
`Foye. Barron explained that he had been in close proximity to Foye, who was contagious and
`
`unmasked, but had not touched him. The editor sent Barron back out into the field.
`
`39.
`
`On or about March 27, 2020, The Post assigned Barron to cover a story regarding
`
`two condominium associations whose porters and doormen had contracted COVID-19. The
`
`associations had asked the residents to fill in while the porters and doormen were sick. Barron’s
`
`assignment was to stand outside two known COVID-19 hot spots to interview and photograph
`
`building residents who had been exposed to the deadly virus.
`
`40.
`
`By March 31, 2020, in the span of only one month, more than 1,000 NYC
`
`residents had died from COVID-19, as reported by The Post.
`
`41.
`
`The Post continued to put Barron at risk so he could provide firsthand coverage of
`
`the virus. On or about April 4, 2020, Dougherty required Barron to go to Grand Central Station
`
`to shoot a time-lapse video spanning 15 hours. As a result, Barron was exposed to hundreds of
`
`individuals who pass through Grand Central over the course of an entire day and evening. He
`
`was also exposed to highly vulnerable members of the homeless population.
`
`42.
`
`On April 12, 2020, The Post reported that one of its sports photographers,
`
`Anthony Causi, had died from COVID-19. Three days later, Governor Andrew Cuomo issued
`
`an Executive Order requiring everyone in NYC to wear a mask in public.
`
`43.
`
`On April 15, 2020, the New York Times published an article indicating that the
`
`Wall Street Journal was providing PPE (KN95 masks, gloves and hand sanitizer) to their
`
`
`
`7
`
`7 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`freelance photographers. The Journal, like The Post, is a News Corp publication. Nevertheless,
`
`The Post had failed to provide any PPE to Barron.
`
`44.
`
`On or about April 19, 2020, News Corp sent Barron seven low-quality surgical
`
`masks, not enough to protect Barron for more than one week of work. Newscorp never sent any
`
`additional masks, nor did it offer to do so.
`
`45.
`
`On April 20, 2020, The Post reported, “New York City’s death toll stands at
`
`13,683 – including probable and confirmed coronavirus cases.”
`
`Barron Reports Being Assaulted
`And Requests Civil Unrest PPE
`
`
`46.
`
`On May 25, 2020, George Floyd, a Black American man, was killed in
`
`Minneapolis, Minnesota while in police custody. This event sparked national unrest and both
`
`peaceful and violent protests in NYC and other cities throughout the country.
`
`47.
`
`By email dated June 2, 2020, Barron reported to Dougherty and to the Photo Desk
`
`that he had twice been assaulted while taking photographs of looters and rioters.
`
`48.
`
`Three days later, Barron emailed Dougherty and inquired whether The Post would
`
`be providing civil unrest PPE – press helmets, vests and eye protection – for photographers and
`
`reporters. In that email, Barron referenced The Post’s delay in providing coronavirus PPE.
`
`Dougherty never responded to Barron’s email.
`
`The Post Illegally Retaliates Against Barron
`By Terminating his Employment
`
`
`49.
`
`On July 22, 2020, less than two months after Barron’s request for civil unrest PPE
`
`and five months after his request for coronavirus PPE, The Post terminated Barron’s
`
`employment. The Post claimed that its decision was a financial one.
`
`50.
`
`At the same time The Post fired Barron, it rehired “runners” who had been
`
`furloughed in April. Runners are entry-level reporters who work the street and feed copy to
`
`
`
`8
`
`8 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`rewrite desks. Their primary responsibility is to find stories by being on the scene. Throughout
`
`the runner furlough, Barron had handled both runner and reporter job responsibilities.
`
`51.
`
`In addition, The Post hired more expensive freelance photographers to fill the
`
`void left by Barron’s absence. Since Barron was fired, The Post has continued to hire freelance
`
`photographers for work Barron could have done for considerably less money.
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`(Violation of New York Labor Law §740 – Retaliation for Whistleblowing)
`
`Barron repeats and realleges each allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 51
`
`52.
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`53.
`
`New York Labor Law §740 prohibits retaliatory personnel action against an
`
`employee who “blows the whistle” on an employer whose unlawful conduct endangers the
`
`public health or safety.
`
`54.
`
`The New York whistleblower law specifically provides that, “An employer shall
`
`not take any retaliatory personnel action against an employee because such employee . . .
`
`discloses . . . to a supervisor . . . an activity, policy or practice of the employer that is in violation
`
`of a law, rule or regulation which violation creates and presents a substantial and specific danger
`
`to the public health or safety . . . .” Labor Law § 740(2)(a).
`
`55.
`
`Barron complained on numerous occasions to his Post supervisor, Chris
`
`Dougherty, about: (1) the lack of coronavirus PPE; (2) being required to work in close proximity
`
`to people infected and possibly infected with COVID-19; and (3) the lack of civil unrest PPE.
`
`56.
`
`The Post failed to provide any of the requested PPE.
`
`57.
`
`News Corp made one lame effort to provide inadequate PPE – a mere seven low-
`
`quality surgical masks.
`
`
`
`9
`
`9 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`58. When Defendants failed to provide adequate coronavirus PPE to Barron, they
`
`created a danger not only to him and to all Post employees, but to the general public with whom
`
`Barron and other Post employees came into contact daily. Absent coronavirus PPE, Barron and
`
`all Post employees were at risk of contracting COVID-19 and of spreading it to other NYC
`
`residents.
`
`59. When Defendants failed to provide any civil unrest PPE, they put Barron and
`
`other Post employees at risk of grave injury when covering looting and rioting.
`
`60.
`
`The Post thus violated OSHA’s “general duty clause,” Section 5(a)(1), which
`
`provides that every employer “shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of
`
`employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death
`
`or serious physical harm to his employees . . . .” 29 USC § 654(a)(1).
`
`61.
`
`By terminating his employment, Defendants retaliated against Barron, in violation
`
`of New York Labor Law § 740, for reporting to his supervisor that Defendants violated OSHA’s
`
`general duty clause by failing to provide PPE to photographers and reporters who were covering
`
`a pandemic and civil unrest.
`
`62.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ violation of New York Labor
`
`Law § 740, Barron has suffered significant economic loss, physical and emotional distress,
`
`embarrassment, damage to his career, and other adverse effects on his daily life.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for the following:
`
`
`
`a.
`
`full compensation for back pay, front pay, benefits, and other
`
`remuneration with interest;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`compensatory damages;
`
`consequential damages;
`
`10
`
`10 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`reinstatement with full fringe benefits and seniority rights;
`
`punitive damages;
`
`pre- and post-judgment interest;
`
`reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and disbursements in this action; and
`
`such other relief as the Court deems equitable and just.
`
`RUBIN EMPLOYMENT LAW
`
`By: ________________________________
`
`Alix R. Rubin
`30 Wall Street
`8th Floor
`New York, NY 10005
`347-756-4828
`
` – and –
`
`695 US Highway 46 West
`Suite 404
`Fairfield, NJ 07004
`973-787-8442
`
`arubin@alixrubinlaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`November 5, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`11 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury of all issues in this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RUBIN EMPLOYMENT LAW
`
`By: ________________________________
`
`Alix R. Rubin
`30 Wall Street
`8th Floor
`New York, NY 10005
`347-756-4828
`
` – and –
`
`695 US Highway 46 West
`Suite 404
`Fairfield, NJ 07004
`973-787-8442
`
`arubin@alixrubinlaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`November 5, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`12 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/05/2020 04:47 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 159519/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/05/2020
`
`ComplaimL Supreme Court NT - Compknot
`
`Sepmne Cout. NYpff
`
`fihr
`
`C L es Tath
`
`4-ransa
`
`local
`
`Lassp C
`
`5gwtxat
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`Taxigh
`
`Barron.
`
`trmg
`
`duly
`
`sworn.
`
`depnes
`
`and says:
`
`and
`Comptamt
`the abov e-titled
`I am the plamtitTin
`read the foregeog
`I lure
`actum.
`theresa
`know the contents
`as to matten
`except
`thereof.
`The same are true to my knowledge,
`them to be true.
`stated to be alleged
`I tehese
`on informanon
`and as to thtw matters.
`and belef.
`
`To the best of my knowledge.
`and behef.
`informanon
`the circumstances.
`under
`these papers or
`the presentanon
`of
`as defined m Subseenon
`frivolous
`(c) of Section
`30-1.1
`of
`.ludge (22 NYCRRL
`
`reasonable
`atler an ingen
`formed
`are na
`therein
`the atentwns
`the Cinef Admmistive
`the Rules of
`
`to before me this
`Sworn
`.
`45
`of November,
`2020.
`
`tn
`
`Taidgb
`
`Barron
`
`-Pe
`
`usserrE APOLO
`op asæwyou
`•usuccan
`h 01AP$319830
`awmes e wcm
`4 Conssaur Eweres87-23-2023
`
`Notary
`
`Public
`
`13 of 13
`
`13
`
`13 of 13
`
`1I 4.2020, 2:29 PM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket