throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 011112020 10:21 .
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2020 10:21 AM
`
`' NYSCI
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 36
`m-fi}
`3F DOC. NO. 36
`é]
`-
`
`INDEX NO-
`716—5557472019?
`INDEX NO. 160694/2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2020
`R«.C«.IV«.D \Irsczarz 01/10/2020
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`'
`
`NEW YORK COUNTY
`
`PRESENT:
`
`HON. DORIS LING-COHAN
`
`-
`
`PART
`
`IAS MOTION 36
`
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`moex No.
`
`160694/2019
`
`, DONALD TRUMP,
`
`_
`
`Defendant.
`
`"'""'---""'""""""“'"“""""l"""""""""""""""""""""""""""x
`
`MOTION DATE
`
`'
`
`MOTION SEQ. NO.
`
`N/A
`
`001
`
`DECISION + ORDER ON
`MOTION
`
`The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 28, 29, 30, 31, 32.
`33, 34
`.
`
`were considered on this motion to/for
`
`'
`
`DISMISS
`
`Defendant Donald Trump (“Trump”) seeks that this Court sign his Order to Show Cause
`
`to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for an interim stay of discovery.
`
`Upon the foregoing documents, it is
`
`ORDERED that the Court declines to sign the within Order to Show Cause submitted by
`defendant Trump, as the moving papers fail to contain an affidavit byhhim, to support his
`
`argument that this Court lackspersonal jurisdiction over him. Although defendant Trump,
`
`through his counsel, claims lack of personal jurisdiction, notably, there is not even a tweet, much
`
`.
`
`less an affidavit by defendant Trump in support of his motion. Instead, as to his claim of lack of
`
`personal jurisdiction, defendant asserts, through his attorney in a'rnére Memorandum of Law in
`
`Support, that this Court should “take judicial notice that the President of the United States has
`
`resided in the White House for the past three years.” (Memorandum of Law in Support, at 2, ill).
`
`However, judicial notice is not appropriate here, as “[a] court may only apply judicial notice to
`
`matters ‘of common and general knowledge, well established, and authoritatively settled, not
`
`160694/2019 CARROLL, E. JEAN vs. TRUMP, DONALD J.
`Motion No. 0017
`'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`lof2
`1 of 2
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2020 10:21 AM
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 011-1120201021 A
`
`Nysc:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 36
`.
`.
`.
`._ 3F DOC. NO. 36
`*5
`
`INDEX NO. 160694/2019
`INDEX NO- ”0694/2019
`
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2020
`R«C«IV«D VYSCEF: 01/10/2020
`
`
`
`doubtful or uncertain [g] the test is whether sufficient notoriety. attaches to the fact to make it
`
`proper to assume its existence without proof.” (Dallas v WR. Grace and C0,, 225 AD2d 319,
`320 [lst Dept 1996], quoting Ecco High Frequency Corp. v Amtorg Trading Corp. , 81 NYS 2d
`
`610 [Sup Ct, NY County 1948], afi’d 274 AD 982 [1st Dept 1948]).
`
`i
`
`The Court notes that, not only Was ~no affidavit from defendant Trump supplied in support
`
`of this application, but even the defendant’s attorney’s affirmation does not assert a basis
`
`(evidentiary or otherwise) for dismissal; rather, the affirmation acts as a mere conduit to provide
`. documents relating to the procedural posture of the case. (Lawrence Rosen Affirmation).
`Moreover, there is no basis for a stay of discovery deadlines in this case.
`I
`
`In the future, all Orders to Show Cause shall be presented in the following manner:
`
`(1) . Notice to the other side as per 22 NYCRR §202.7(f) and the Court shall also be
`
`provided with courtesy hard copies in hand, of all papers; and
`
`'(2)
`
`Movant shall seek an appropriate “time, date and place” as per 22 NYCRR '
`
`I
`
`§202.7(f), for presentation of any application, from the Part’s court attorney by telephone, prior I
`
`
`-
`
`
`DORIS LING-COHAN, J.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`to filing.
`
`1/6/2020
`
`DATE
`
`CHECK ONE:
`
`APPLICATION:
`
`CASE msposeo
`GRANTED
`SETTLE ORDER
`
`‘
`
`DENIED
`
`NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
`GRANTED IN PART
`SUBMIT ORDER
`
`-
`
`[:1 OTHER
`
`CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:
`
`INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN
`
`FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT»
`
`a D REFERENCE
`
`J :Uudge_Ling-Cohan\OSC\Denied\Carrol| v Trump 01606942019 001.docx
`
`160694I2019 CARROLL, E. JEAN vs. TRUMP, DONALD J.
`Motion No. 001
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`20f2‘
`2 of 2
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket