throbber
1
`
` SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`
`NEW YORK COUNTY
`
`PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
`by LETITIA JAMES, Attorney General
`of the State of New York
`Plaintiff,
`- against –
`Robert G. Kramer,
`Defendant
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`Index number:
`
`Plaintiff, People of the State of New York, by its attorney, Letitia James, Attorney
`General of the State of New York (“OAG” or “Plaintiff”), alleges as follows against Defendant
`Robert G. Kramer (“Kramer” or “Defendant Kramer”):
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1. In the midst of the COVID-19 crisis, Defendant Kramer, the then-CEO of
`Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (“Emergent”), engaged in illegal insider trading of Emergent stock.
`Kramer entered into the illegal trades while in possession of material nonpublic information
`regarding serious and unresolved contamination issues Emergent faced in manufacturing
`COVID-19 vaccine drug substance for AstraZeneca PLC (“AstraZeneca”).
`2. Kramer sold over $10 million worth of Emergent stock while the contamination
`and production problems remained undisclosed to the public and just days before the stock’s
`price began a steady decline following analyst concerns about production.
`3. Operation Warp Speed was an effort by the U.S. government to support the rapid
`development of COVID-19 vaccine candidates. On June 1, 2020, Emergent joined the federal
`government’s effort by committing space in Emergent’s plant located in Bayview, Maryland, to
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`1 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`support the rapid development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. Emergent also entered
`into lucrative partnerships with both AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson to produce drug
`substance for the companies’ COVID-19 vaccine candidates.
`4. On June 11, 2020, Emergent publicly announced an agreement, valued at $87
`million, to provide development and manufacturing services for AstraZeneca’s COVID-19
`vaccine candidate, ChAdOxl nCOV-19 (AZD1222) (the “Product” or “AZD1222”), at
`Emergent’s Bayview facility.
`5. On July 27, 2020, Emergent announced a second contract with AstraZeneca,
`publicly valued at $174 million, which provided for contract development and manufacturing
`(“CDMO”) services for vaccine drug substance production by Emergent between July 2020 and
`June 2021 at large scale for commercial supply. Emergent’s two contracts with AstraZeneca
`were worth a combined value of $261 million.1
`6. In the week following Emergent’s announcement of its CDMO contract with
`AstraZeneca, Emergent’s stock price climbed 29.5%, going from $94.78 on July 27, 2020, to
`close at $134.46 on August 5, 2020.
`7. As development of the manufacturing process progressed over the fall of 2020,
`Emergent experienced serious manufacturing difficulties, particularly with contamination of
`AZD1222. Specifically, Emergent discovered excess bioburden (bacteria) and elevated
`endotoxin (a type of toxin released by bacteria) in multiple drug substance batches, as early as
`
`1 The manufacturing and production contracts Emergent secured with AstraZeneca were its
`second foray into manufacturing a COVID-19 vaccine substance. On April 23, 2020, prior to the
`U.S. government’s announcement of Operation Warp Speed, Emergent secured a contract to
`manufacture vaccine substance for Johnson & Johnson also at Emergent’s Bayview facility. On
`July 2, 2020, the parties entered into a second large scale drug substance manufacturing
`agreement which expanded the term of the agreement and was valued at more than $480 million.
`The two vaccines would later become cross-contaminated.
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`2 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`September 26, 2020. Kramer, as CEO, knew of the contamination at least as early as October 6,
`2020.
`8. In early October, these contamination issues led to the rejection and destruction of
`multiple batches of vaccine drug substance, each containing potentially millions of dose-
`equivalents of vaccine.
`9. Because of the serious, continuing and unresolved contamination, Emergent and
`AstraZeneca agreed to pause production of AZD1222 to investigate the root cause, and
`ultimately aborted, rejected or destroyed multiple batches. These manufacturing issues led to
`Emergent’s inability to meet the rapid production schedule anticipated in its contracts with
`AstraZeneca.
`10. In mid-October 2020, shortly after learning of the contamination problems at
`Emergent, Defendant Kramer asked his investment adviser to complete a Rule 10b5-1 stock
`trading plan (the “Trading Plan”) which would allow Kramer to exercise stock options and
`simultaneously sell the acquired shares. Kramer had not implemented such a Trading Plan since
`2016.
`11. On November 13, 2020, while Emergent was in an all-hands-on-deck
`manufacturing crisis and still in the midst of an internal investigation of the unresolved
`contamination and manufacturing problems that had not been disclosed to the public, Defendant
`Kramer finalized and entered into the Trading Plan. The terms of the Trading Plan required the
`immediate sale of shares upon Emergent’s stock reaching a preset price.
`12. The Martin Act, New York General Business Law § 352 et seq., forbids
`fraudulent practices, including the trading of stock by company insiders in possession of material
`nonpublic information. No statute, rule or law permits Rule 10b5-1 trading plans to be used as a
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`3 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`way of evading insider trading laws when an insider is aware of material nonpublic information
`at the time the trading plan is adopted.
`13. Defendant Kramer realized proceeds of $10,121,079.50 on the sale of Emergent
`stock under his Trading Plan. On January 15, January 20, January 21 and February 8, 2021,
`Defendant Kramer exercised various Emergent stock options to purchase Emergent stock at
`prices ranging from $25.62 to $30.86 per share. Pursuant to the Trading Plan, Defendant Kramer
`then immediately sold multiple lots of the shares he had acquired. Kramer sold 19,026 shares on
`January 15, then sold 2,232 shares on January 20, another 21,900 shares on January 21, followed
`by the sale of an additional 45,397 shares on February 8, 2021. These Emergent stock sales were
`consummated at weighted average sales prices ranging between approximately $106 and $120
`per share, significantly higher than Kramer’s purchase price.
`14. Shortly after Kramer completed these sales of stock on February 8, 2021,
`information about some of Emergent’s struggles was revealed to the public. After reaching a
`high of $125.19 per share on February 12, 2021, Emergent’s stock price began a steady decline
`from which it has not recovered. As of the date of this filing, Emergent stock currently trades at
`approximately $12 per share.
`15. Defendant Kramer’s actions violated the Martin Act.
`PARTIES
`16. Plaintiff is the People of the State of New York, represented by Letitia James,
`Attorney General of the State of New York, and is authorized to bring this action in the name
`and on behalf of the People of the State of New York pursuant to the Martin Act.
`17. Defendant Kramer was employed by Emergent for more than two decades in
`multiple roles. He joined Emergent as its Chief Financial Officer in 1999. In that role, he was
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`4 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`responsible for financial accounting and reporting, budgeting and analysis, and investor relations.
`From March 2018 to April 2019, Defendant Kramer was Emergent’s Chief Operating Officer,
`responsible for supervising manufacturing operations, among other duties. Defendant Kramer
`became the CEO of Emergent on April 1, 2019. As CEO, Defendant Kramer was responsible for
`management of the entire company. Kramer retired from Emergent on August 1, 2023.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`18. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, jurisdiction over
`Defendant Kramer, and authority to grant the relief requested pursuant to the Martin Act.
`19. The Martin Act authorizes the Attorney General to commence a civil action for
`restitution, disgorgement and other relief against any person or corporation engaging or
`participating in fraudulent practices in the issuance, exchange, purchase, sale, promotion,
`negotiation, advertisement, investment advice, or distribution of securities or commodities within
`or from New York State.
`20. The transactions complained of were arranged and executed for Kramer by
`Defendant Kramer’s investment adviser, Merrill Lynch, on the New York Stock Exchange
`through its block trading desk in New York. The stock sales at issue were made pursuant to a
`Trading Plan which provided that it be governed by New York law. On November 13, 2020,
`Defendant Kramer signed the Trading Plan and agreed that his transactions were governed by
`New York law.
`21. New York investors, including New York State employee retirement funds,
`bought, sold, and held hundreds of thousands of shares in Emergent stock during the relevant
`period.
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`5 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`22. Pursuant to C.P.L.R. 503, venue is proper in New York County because
`Plaintiff’s office is located in this county.
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`A. Emergent Secures and Publicizes Multimillion Dollar Contracts from AstraZeneca
`
`23. In light of the COVID-19 emergency, the federal government announced
`Operation Warp Speed on May 15, 2020, with the goal of coordinating efforts in the public and
`private sectors to get vaccines for the coronavirus produced and approved as quickly as possible.
`24. One week later, on May 21, 2020, AstraZeneca, a multinational pharmaceutical
`company headquartered in Cambridge, United Kingdom, announced its vaccine candidate,
`AZD1222.
`25. On June 10, 2020, AstraZeneca and Emergent entered into a Master Services
`Agreement pursuant to which Emergent would produce bulk drug substance for AZD1222.
`26. On June 11, 2020, Emergent issued a press release announcing the agreement to
`support the manufacturing of AZD1222.2
`27. Emergent’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2020, stated that “[o]n June
`10, 2020, Emergent entered into an agreement with AstraZeneca to provide CDMO services,
`technology transfer, analytical testing, drug substance process and performance qualification and
`will reserve certain large-scale manufacturing capacity through 2020.” In the press release,
`Emergent valued the agreement at approximately $87 million.
`28. On July 24, 2020, Emergent and AstraZeneca entered into a Master Services
`Agreement to produce drug substance at large scale for commercial supply. On that same date,
`
`2 https://www.emergentbiosolutions.com/press/news-release-details-emergent-biosolutions-signs-
`agreement-be-us-manufacturing-0/
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`6 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`the parties also agreed on a Manufacturing Product Schedule and Work Order for the large-scale
`manufacturing of AZD1222.
`29. On July 27, 2020, Emergent issued a press release announcing that it had signed a
`COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing agreement with AstraZeneca pursuant to which “Emergent
`will provide contract development and manufacturing services beginning in 2020 to produce
`drug substance at large scale for commercial supply.” In the press release, Emergent also
`announced that the “Agreement is valued at approximately $174 million through 2021 and brings
`the total AstraZeneca commitment to $261 million.”
`30. In response to the announcements, Emergent’s stock price almost doubled in
`price, increasing from a low of $68.11 on June 11, 2020, to a high of $134.46 on August 5, 2020.
`31. Pursuant to the Manufacturing Product Schedule and Work Order dated July 24,
`2020, Emergent agreed to manufacture up to 95 vaccine drug substance batches by April 30,
`2021, and 120 batches by June 30, 2021. Each batch contained several million dose-equivalents
`of COVID-19 vaccine drug substance. The expected production schedule called for up to 15
`batches (12 initial, 3 additional) of AZD1222 at Emergent’s Bayview, Maryland, manufacturing
`facility, Area 13, from July 1 through November 30, 2020. The expected production schedule
`included the manufacture of up to 80 batches of AZD1222 (32 initial, 48 additional) at Bayview
`Area 3 from September 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021, and 25 additional batches in Area 3
`from May 1 through June 30, 2021.
`32. Emergent’s November 19, 2020, CDMO Executive Management Team Budget
`Review projected 79 batches of AZD1222 in 2021 for revenue of $158 million.
`
`3 Emergent’s manufacture of AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine candidates was
`scheduled to take place in separate areas within Emergent’s Bayview facility.
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`7 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`B. Emergent’s Manufacture of AZD1222 Suffers from Early Microbial Contamination
`
`33. Emergent’s production, manufacture and quality control of AZD1222 was led by
`Sean Kirk (“Kirk”), Executive Vice President, Manufacturing and Technical Operations, and
`Adam Havey (“Havey”), Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Both Kirk and
`Havey reported directly to Defendant Kramer and kept him apprised of Emergent’s progress.
`34. During this time, Defendant Kramer, who resided in Michigan, spent five weeks
`at a time onsite at Bayview. Kramer received regular updates from his direct reports, including
`Kirk and Havey. Kramer spoke to Kirk on a near daily basis and spoke to Havey multiple times
`per week during Operation Warp Speed. Kramer additionally held separate one-on-one meetings
`with Kirk and Havey on at least a weekly basis.
`35. As a matter of safety, pharmaceutical products generally undergo bacterial
`contamination tests including for endotoxin (toxic components of bacteria which can cause
`dangerous reactions) and bioburden (bacterial colonies). These tests ensure the safety and
`usability of pharmaceuticals, including vaccines. Tests that exceed certain levels can trigger
`“alerts” or “alarms,” and result in the destruction of pharmaceutical or vaccine drug substance
`batches.
`36. On or about September 26, 2020, Emergent began noticing indices of
`contamination in its production of AZD1222, including elevated levels of endotoxin and excess
`bioburden.
`37. On or about October 1, 2020, Emergent began an investigation into “initial
`indications of microbial contamination” in the early batches of AZD1222.
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`8 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`38. On October 2, 2020, following procedures defined by the U.S. Food & Drug
`Administration (“FDA”) for quality management, Emergent discovered a deviation4 in its
`vaccine manufacturing process that it classified as “Critical.” The deviation related to an
`“endotoxin event” on the same date. In the context of FDA manufacturing rules, critical
`deviations mean that a batch of drug substance is likely unusable. 21 U.S.C.S. § 331(a) and 21
`C.F.R. § 210.1.
`39. Kirk and Havey met with AstraZeneca at least once a week to discuss Emergent’s
`progress in successfully manufacturing AZD1222. They also frequently had larger meetings
`with AstraZeneca which included Emergent’s partners in the federal government.
`40. On October 5, 2020, during a regularly scheduled weekly meeting to review the
`progress of the COVID-19 project, Emergent notified the U.S. government’s Biomedical
`Advance Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”), a Department of Health and
`Human Services (“HHS”) working group that was involved in the management of Operation
`Warp Speed, that Emergent had aborted two batches of AZD1222. Each aborted batch meant the
`destruction of millions of dose-equivalents of vaccine drug substance.
`41. On October 6, 2020, Kirk provided Defendant Kramer with a copy of a
`PowerPoint presentation, including slides about the aborted, contaminated batches discussed at
`the previous day’s meeting.
`42. On October 13, 2020, key managers and employees working for both Emergent
`and AstraZeneca concluded that five out of the first seven batches of AZD1222 produced by
`Emergent were likely to be lost to contamination due to alarm level tests for endotoxin and
`
`4 A deviation is a term in FDA-regulated industries defined as follows: “Discrepancy – Datum or result
`outside of the expected range; an unfulfilled requirement; may be called non-conformity, defect,
`deviation, out-of-specification, out-of-limit, out-of-trend” https://www.fda.gov/media/71023/download
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`9 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`bioburden (tests that indicated the presence of unacceptably high levels of toxic bacteria), and
`discussed the possible need to stop manufacturing in order to investigate the cause of the
`contamination.
`43. That same day, Emergent’s Quality Assurance Chief sent an email to Havey
`stating “. . . [W]e’re likely to lose 5 of 7 batches to date due to contamination issues . . . . My
`question is if we need to stop production to investigate [the ongoing contamination issue].”
`44. On October 13, 2020, Kirk emailed senior leadership at AstraZeneca saying that
`Emergent had “all hands on deck to evaluate the current challenges …”. An AstraZeneca EVP
`replied: “The situation is indeed worrisome and we are very concerned.”
`45. On October 13, 2020, Kirk also told Defendant Kramer that he worried that the
`concerning bioburden test results would likely be discussed in a meeting later that day with
`AstraZeneca and BARDA. Later in the day, Kirk sent Defendant Kramer an email stating “Bob,
`Drawing your attention to Slide 10. Couple of issues last week. I can cover in today…with
`[BARDA] meeting if they come up. The bioburden issue may create some tension between us
`and [AstraZeneca] and could require a process change….”
`46. Slide 10, labeled “Update since 10/5”, notes some of the contamination identified
`as of October 13, 2020:
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`10 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Update since 10/5 emergent
`AZAreas 1 &3
`" First DSShipment ever! 21001940+
`" Endotoxin/Bioburden issue emerging possibly starting at AEXstep
`" 21001941, 21002064affected
`" CompletedDSbatch 21002064
`" Small leak at DSbag - re-filtered
`" 21001904- contaminated 2,000L bioreactor
`" Investigation in-progress
`- All relevant samples collected &submitted
`- Bag, connections, penetrations examined
`. BARDAUpdate- 13Oct2020
`11
`
`
`
`47. The following day, on October 14, 2020, in response to an email from an
`AstraZeneca employee regarding agenda items for an October 16, 2020, weekly BARDA
`meeting, an expert at HHS sent an email to AstraZeneca requesting the addition of the following
`new agenda item: “the QC [quality control] testing model provided by Emergent and proposed
`strategy related to downstream endotoxin failures.”
`48. On October 15, 2020, a member of the AstraZeneca team replied to HHS’s expert
`and requested Emergent’s participation in the discussion regarding its quality control and
`proposed strategy for handling its endotoxin failures.
`49. Because of the serious, unresolved contamination problems, Emergent and
`AstraZeneca agreed to pause production of multiple batches of AZD1222, each containing up to
`millions of dose-equivalents of vaccine drug substance, and multiple batches were ultimately
`aborted or rejected and destroyed.
`C. In the Midst of Serious, Undisclosed Contamination Issues, Defendant Kramer
`Pursued a Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan
`
`50. In mid-October, with knowledge of the destruction of multiple batches of
`AZD1222 due to contamination issues and after an internal investigation was underway,
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`11 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`Defendant Kramer sought to exercise his Emergent stock options to purchase stock and then
`immediately sell it off.
`51. As part of Kramer’s compensation and incentive package, he regularly received
`options to purchase shares of Emergent stock. In October 2020, Kramer held 231,764 options to
`purchase Emergent stock at exercise prices ranging from $25.62 to $61.44.
`52. On Sunday October 11, 2020, Defendant Kramer called and spoke to his
`investment adviser at Merrill Lynch. He asked him about entering into the Trading Plan to sell
`Emergent stock.
`53. On October 12, 2020, Defendant Kramer sent an email to his investment adviser
`with a summary of his stock options saying: “Please review and lets [sic] discuss the best way to
`incorporate this into my portfolio investment planning.”
`54. On October 14, 2020, in a scheduled call, Defendant Kramer again spoke with his
`investment adviser to discuss drafting a Rule 10b5-1 plan.
`55. On October 16, 2020, Defendant Kramer and his investment adviser again had a
`phone conversation where they discussed the Trading Plan, including the type of equity awards
`that could be covered under the plan and the limit price.
`56. On October 20, 2020, Merrill Lynch sent Defendant Kramer a draft of the Trading
`Plan. Under the draft Trading Plan, once a 60 day ‘cooling-off’ period after signing the Trading
`Plan had passed, Defendant Kramer would exercise his options and sell the stock when the price
`was greater than $100. At the time of drafting the Trading Plan, the price of Emergent stock was
`approximately $100, and had traded at over $111 a few days prior.
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`12 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`D. Emergent’s Contamination Problem Intensifies at the End of October
`
`57. Defendant Kramer was fully aware of the escalating manufacturing problems.
`Kirk and Havey, reporting directly to Defendant Kramer, met and spoke regularly with Kramer
`throughout the investigation into the contamination problems and kept Kramer fully apprised of
`the continuing and unresolved problems at Emergent’s Bayview facility where AZD1222 was
`being manufactured.
`58. Defendant Kramer’s handwritten diary from October 21, 2020, notes “at scale
`contamination,” “bioburden/endotoxin,” “pushing for downstream filtration step,” and that “AZ
`has resisted.”
`59. On October 23, 2020, an AstraZeneca SVP emailed Kirk and stated: “The
`situation is clearly deeply concerning as [also] the most recent batch has endotoxin/Bio hits and
`my understanding is that we now have found it in the buffer solution. This really makes me
`concerned that we may have a bigger and more systematic issue at the Site . . . .”
`60. The same day, an AstraZeneca EVP emailed Kirk stating: “We remain very
`concerned and sincerely hope that EBS [Emergent] can turn this around rapidly . . . . While I
`understand your point on the speed of what we are doing, I must share that others in our partner
`network have performed more reliably to date. We are simply nervous that the US supply chain
`is falling behind.”
`61. The increasing concerns about contamination led to a “Senior Leader Call” that
`included Kirk and Havey, the AstraZeneca SVP, and representatives of BARDA, where
`AstraZeneca executives expressed “concerns at a number of levels” about “Emergent’s ability to
`meet our expectations (and commitments.)”
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`13 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`62. On October 25, 2020, Kirk texted Havey complaining that “Issues keep piling up.
`This was last night. The AZ meeting is 8:30am on Tuesday at bayview. They asked to do a
`gemba5 walk and I said ‘no’.”
`63. During a meeting that took place the following day on October 26, 2020, a slide
`from a COVID-19 Projects Update PowerPoint presentation highlighted multiple vaccine batches
`as “late, can’t recover,” and contained a revised manufacturing schedule identifying the number
`of batches that were reduced in 2020 and early 2021.
`64. On the morning of October 26, 2020, Kirk texted Havey and told Havey that he
`had given Defendant Kramer the “full landscape.”
`65. As Emergent’s CEO, Defendant Kramer was aware of Emergent’s continuing
`contamination problems and understood that the U.S. government was expressing concern about
`the ability of Emergent to implement AstraZeneca’s process in accordance with Operation Warp
`Speed.
`E. Emergent Promoted the AstraZeneca Contracts in SEC Filings and Analyst Calls
`but Failed to Disclose the Serious, Unresolved Contamination Issues
`
`66. On November 6, 2020, Emergent filed its 3Q2020 10-Q quarterly report with the
`SEC which touted its contracts for the production of AZD1222 but omitted any mention of
`Emergent’s serious and unresolved manufacturing and contamination problems with AZD1222.
`67. Defendant Kramer concealed Emergent’s problems during Emergent’s 3Q2020
`analyst earnings call on November 5, 2020. Specifically, Defendant Kramer told analysts that
`Emergent had met the goal of establishing the manufacturing process for its COVID-19 vaccine
`contracts with both AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, stating “…we were to have established
`
`5 A Gemba Walk is a business term derived from Japanese crime fiction; “genba” meaning “the actual
`place”, where management walks the “crime scene” looking for the source of the problems.
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`14 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`a large-scale manufacturing infrastructure and tech-transfer their candidates to this infrastructure
`to our Bayview facility outside of Baltimore during 2020 and early into 2021, and that is
`essentially complete. The second commitment of obligation, if you will, is to manufacture and
`supply drug substance to their vaccine candidates in support of their global supply chain goals...”
`68. Defendant Kramer also responded to questions regarding Emergent’s overall
`procurement and contracting outlook without acknowledging the existence of any problems,
`including the ongoing unresolved bioburden and endotoxin contamination problems, the rejected
`and destroyed vaccine drug substance batches, manufacturing delays, or their impact on the
`vaccine drug substance production schedule.
`69. At the time of Defendant Kramer’s statements on November 5, 2020, Emergent
`had not yet successfully completed what is known as a Process Performance Qualification
`(“PPQ”) batch—a successful batch of drug substan ce according to a replicable set of procedures
`that will produce successful batches without further changes—of AZD1222. Without a PPQ
`batch, the tech transfer process was not complete, the FDA could not issue an authorization, and
`Emergent was not prepared to begin manufacturing commercial batches of AZD1222.
`F. In Early November, the Contamination Issue Remained Unresolved
`
`70. At the beginning of November 2020, at AstraZeneca’s urging, Emergent initiated
`a “war room” approach to its bioburden investigation.
`71. On Friday, November 6, 2020, Kirk complained in a group text that Emergent’s
`failures to take promised actions and deliver results was hurting Emergent’s relationship with
`AstraZeneca, stating “If we don’t get more active on the floor leadership dealing with this stuff
`then we are doomed from a credibility perspective. We are currently at a significant relational
`deficit with AZ and need to get aggressive to get out of this hole.”
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`15 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`72. On Saturday November 7, 2020, as Emergent staff were still working through the
`weekend and overwhelmed by the number of problematic test results, Kirk exchanged the
`following texts with Havey expressing his concern over the situation:
`Sean Kirk <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T09:51:26.0000000Z
`Endotoxin hits throughout ppq 1 in area 1. This is in addition to the endotoxin hit we got
`on the first run in area 3. Call with AZ is at noon. Word is they are going to tell us they
`want to come in Monday and assess our overall operational readiness.
`
`Havey, Adam <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:01:21.0000000Z
`What's your position?
`
`Havey, Adam <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:01:31.0000000Z
`What are mike and Sue saying?
`
`Sean Kirk <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:13:20.0000000Z
`We have a prep call at 11. I'm not sure I have a position. it's not like I can’t tell them
`they can’t come with all the concerns they have
`
`Havey, Adam <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:13:42.0000000Z
`Understood
`
`Havey, Adam <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:14:12.0000000Z
`The area 1 hits are concerning...
`
`Sean Kirk <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:25:12.0000000Z
`At this point everything is concerning. Like fighting the Chinese army
`
`Havey, Adam <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-07T10:38:50.0000000Z
`Sorry, I wasn’t trying to pile on or be glib. I was just thinking out loud
`
`73. On Saturday November 7, 2020, senior AstraZeneca executives spoke with
`members of the Emergent Executive Management Team and expressed their concerns about the
`lack of progress in resolving the bioburden contamination problem. Emergent understood that
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`16 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`the situation at that time was urgent and severe. In an internal AstraZeneca email summarizing
`the meeting, one AstraZeneca manager said: “We where [sic] very clear with them that we need
`to see a totally different level of senior leadership from their side from now on and that we are
`bringing in the cavalry in form of our most experienced SME-s/Leaders…”
`74. Over the course of the weekend, AstraZeneca management suggested to Kirk and
`others at Emergent that production be halted and the schedule slowed down while Emergent
`continued to investigate the source of the contamination, so as not to lose additional batches of
`vaccine.
`75. Defendant Kramer was aware of the escalating situation. On Sunday November 8,
`2020, Kirk texted Defendant Kramer to update him on conversations Kirk had with
`AstraZeneca’s leadership and with BARDA over the weekend and notifying Kramer that he may
`be receiving a call regarding same:
`Sean Kirk <[redacted phone number] (IMessage)>
`
`Bob sorry to bother you but could you please give me a call when you have a
`couple minutes. Would like to update you on some conversations with
`AstraZeneca leadership and Ba[r]da this weekend. You make it a call from
`[G]eneral Perna [head of BARDA] so I wanted to give you an update in the event
`that happens
`
`76. On Monday, November 9, 2020, Defendant Kramer texted Kirk about the
`pressure they were under:
`Kramer, Robert <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-09T14:59:42.0000000Z
`Let's talk before our call with Perna. I’m open until 4:30 PM.
`
`Sean Kirk <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-09T15:05:53.0000000Z
`I will call at 4 or just before. Having a challenging day. Ows/ barda asking for me to
`run bayview full time
`
`Kramer, Robert <[redacted phone number]>
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/15/2026 11:00 AMINDEX NO. 450441/2026
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/15/2026
`17 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`2020-11-09T15:11:55.0000000Z
`I know, I spoke to Adam.
`
`Sean Kirk <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-09T16:40:55.0000000Z
`Az presented it as their gift to us to slow down. Such bullshit.
`
`Kramer, Robert <[redacted phone number]>
`2020-11-09T16:41:30.0000000Z
`For sure.
`
`77. By November 10, 2020, Emergent and AstraZeneca had agreed to slow down
`production and come up with a plan to implement the slowdown, which ultimately included
`removing three batches from the schedule to further investigate and implement corrective
`actions.
`78. On November 13, 2020, the federal government, AstraZeneca, and Emergent held
`yet another meeting. A slide from a PowerPoint presentation show

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket