`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`
`SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against -
`
`
`
`NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF
`ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`(Catskill Aqueduct Repair and Rehabilitation)
`
`
`
`To The Above-Named Defendants:
`
`
`
`Index No.
`Date Purchased:
`
`Plaintiff(s) designate (s) New York
`County as to the place of Trial
`
`The basis of the venue is location of
`Defendant’s Offices
`SUMMONS
`
`Plaintiff(s) reside(s) at:
`150 Meadowlands Parkway,
`Secaucus, NJ 07094
`
`YOU ARE SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve a copy of
`your Answer, or, if the Complaint is not served with this Summons, to serve a Notice of
`Appearance, on the plaintiff’s attorney(s) within twenty (20) days after the service of this
`Summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within thirty (30) days after the service is complete
`if this Summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case your
`failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded
`in the Complaint.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`May 18, 2023
`
`McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP
`225 Liberty Street, 36th Floor
`New York, New York 10281
`(212) 483-9490
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Mark A. Rosen
`Mark A. Rosen
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant’s Address:
`
`One Centre Street
`New York, New York 10007
`
`
`4789862_1
`
`1 of 8
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against -
`
`
`
`NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF
`ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`(Catskill Aqueduct Repair and Rehabilitation)
`
`Index No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, by its attorneys McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its
`
`verified complaint against defendant, alleges as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Schiavone Construction Co. LLC (“Schiavone”) is a corporation duly
`
`authorized to conduct business in the State of New York.
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, defendant NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (“DEP”) is a municipal agency duly organized and
`
`existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York with the ability to sue and be
`
`sued.
`
`3.
`
`That heretofore pursuant to public bidding and in compliance with the laws made
`
`and provided therefor, plaintiff entered into a written contract (“Contract”) with the DEP to
`
`perform the labor and furnish the equipment and material required for a project known as the
`
`Catskill Aqueduct Repair and Rehabilitation, Contract No. 20181427993 (“Project”).
`
`Said Contract was in all respects regularly executed and was in accordance with
`
`Thereafter, plaintiff entered into performance of the Contract and duly performed
`
`law.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`4769550_1
`
`2 of 8
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`all of the terms and conditions of the Contract on its part to be performed through the date of this
`
`complaint except as prevented by the defendant.
`
`6.
`
`On or about April 18, 2023, plaintiff duly filed a Notice of Claim with the
`
`Comptroller of the City of New York setting forth its claims.
`
`7.
`
`More than 30 days have elapsed since the filing of said notice of claim and
`
`before the commencement of this action, but defendant and said Comptroller has refused and
`
`neglected to pay or adjust plaintiff’s said claims.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
`
`paragraphs “1” through “7” of the complaint with the same force and effect as though fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff’s performance of its contract work has been substantially and materially
`
`disrupted, interfered with and delayed by circumstances uncontemplated by plaintiff which could
`
`not have been reasonably foreseen when the contract was bid and entered into and by
`
`affirmative, intentional or grossly intentional acts and bad faith by defendant, all of which
`
`constitute breaches of defendant’s fundamental obligations of the contract.
`
`10. DEP’s affirmative, intentional, bad faith or grossly negligent or uncontemplated
`
`acts and omissions constituting material breaches of fundamental obligations include, but are not
`
`limited to, the failure to provide access to the site; the issuance of inaccurate, incomplete and
`
`erroneous bid and design documents; the failure to provide a design that was appropriate for the
`
`project and free of design errors and omissions; the failure to properly assess and the
`
`misrepresentations of conditions at the site; the issuance of an excessive amount of design
`
`changes, extra work and change orders; the failure to timely issue and approve required re-
`
` 2
`
`
`
`3 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`designs necessary for the change orders and extra work and to allow the work to proceed; the
`
`failure to timely register change orders; the failure to properly assess hazardous environmental
`
`conditions at the site; the direction that respirators must be worn for biofilm removal; the
`
`addition of a fourth shutdown for the performance of remaining contract and additional change
`
`order work; the direction to suspend work.
`
`11.
`
` In addition, the project was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the rules
`
`and restrictions as to how work could proceed imposed by various government entities including,
`
`but not limited to, the DEP.
`
`12.
`
`That by reason of the affirmative, intentional or grossly negligent or
`
`uncontemplated acts and bad faith of the defendant constituting material breaches of fundamental
`
`obligations and the excessive Change Orders and redesigns, plaintiff was prevented from
`
`performing and completing the work in accordance with the schedule, phasing and sequencing
`
`set forth in the Contract Documents upon which plaintiff relied upon in preparing its bid for the
`
`Project and entering into the Contract.
`
`13.
`
`That by reason of the foregoing, plaintiff’s progress and performance of its work,
`
`as well as that of its subcontractors, was substantially interfered with and plaintiff was forced to
`
`perform in a non-sequential, disrupted, non-productive manner and the duration of the
`
`performance of the contract has been extended well beyond the original contract completion
`
`date.
`
`14. Defendant’s breaches and misrepresentations were deliberate, willful, reckless
`
`and grossly negligent and plaintiff, in bidding this contract based on the bid documents could not
`
`have anticipated or contemplated the long delays and interferences resulting from defendant’s
`
`improper performance of its contractual obligations.
`
` 3
`
`
`
`4 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`15.
`
`That as a result of the foregoing, plaintiff’s and its subcontractor’s, cost of
`
`performing the work was substantially and excessively increased beyond what it otherwise
`
`would have cost to complete the contract by reason of increased costs for labor, material, greatly
`
`extended field supervision and field overhead and general overhead costs.
`
`16.
`
`That by reason of the foregoing plaintiff has been damaged in a sum not less than
`
`$19,325,991.57 no part of which has been paid although duly demanded.
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff reserves its right to payment of all other monies due or to become due
`
`under the Contract for work performed or to be performed, including change orders for approved
`
`and disputed extra work, and the return of all bonds and other securities deposited to secure
`
`payment of monies retained under the Contract.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs “1” through “17” inclusive of the complaint with the same force and effect as though
`
`fully set forth herein.
`
`19.
`
`That in submitting its bid for the contract based upon the bid documents
`
`presented to it by the defendant, plaintiff contemplated that defendant’s plans and specifications
`
`would be accurate and adequate, that there would be no extensive redesigns of the work, that
`
`defendant would promptly determine any necessary changes in the plans and specifications, that
`
`defendant’s representations concerning the schedule and the work of other trades were
`
`substantially accurate and adequate, that defendant would provide plaintiff timely access to
`
`necessary areas of the site for the plaintiff’s work, that defendant would efficiently and
`
`effectively coordinate, supervise, schedule and progress the work with the various trades on the
`
`project, that defendant would not interfere with the performance, procedures and sequencing
`
` 4
`
`
`
`5 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`plaintiff reasonably anticipated utilizing, that defendant would allow plaintiff adequate and
`
`reasonable time to perform its work and issue appropriate and reasonable extensions of time and
`
`do all things required to enable plaintiff to perform its work expeditiously by normal and
`
`contemplated sequencing procedures and in accordance with the Contract Documents.
`
`20.
`
`That defendant has materially breached the contract by DEP’s affirmative,
`
`intentional, bad faith or grossly negligent or uncontemplated acts and omissions constituting
`
`material breaches of fundamental obligations include, but are not limited to, the failure to
`
`provide access to the site; the issuance of inaccurate, incomplete and erroneous bid and design
`
`documents; the failure to provide a design that was appropriate for the project and free of design
`
`errors and omissions; the failure to properly assess and the misrepresentations of conditions at
`
`the site; the issuance of an excessive amount of design changes, extra work and change orders;
`
`the failure to timely issue and approve required re-designs necessary for the change orders and
`
`extra work and to allow the work to proceed; the failure to timely register change orders; the
`
`failure to properly assess hazardous environmental conditions at the site; the direction that
`
`respirators must be worn for biofilm removal; the addition of a fourth shutdown for the
`
`performance of remaining contract and additional change order work; the direction to suspend
`
`work.
`
`21.
`
`That as a result of defendant’s aforesaid breaches of its contract obligations, there
`
`has been a material and cardinal change in the nature of the work, as contemplated by plaintiff.
`
`Plaintiff has been precluded from performing the work as and when contemplated when the
`
`contract was bid and plaintiff’s work has been caused to be extended well beyond the anticipated
`
`completion date.
`
`22.
`
`That by reason thereof plaintiff, and its subcontractors, have been subjected to
`
` 5
`
`
`
`6 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`substantial additional and otherwise unnecessary costs for labor, materials and equipment,
`
`greatly extended field supervision and field overhead and general office overhead not
`
`contemplated by plaintiff or its subcontractors in submitting their bids for the project.
`
`23.
`
`That as a result of the foregoing plaintiff has been damaged in an amount not less
`
`than $17 million no part of which has been paid although duly demanded.
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant in a sum not less than
`
`$19,325,991.57 on its First Cause of Action and in a sum not less than $17 million on its Second
`
`Cause of Action together with interest thereon, the costs and disbursements of this action and
`
`such other and further relief the Court deems proper.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`May 18 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY &
`CARPENTER, LLP
`
`By
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark A. Rosen
`Mark A. Rosen
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`225 Liberty Street, 36th Floor
`New York, New York 10281
`(212) 483-9490
`
`
`
`
`
` 6
`
`
`
`7 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`
`
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`Mark A. Rosen, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of
`
`New York, affirms the following under the penalties of perjury:
`
`I am a member of the firm of McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, attorney
`
`for the plaintiff herein.
`
`I have read the foregoing Complaint and know the contents thereof; and, the same is true
`
`on information and belief based on the corporate records and discussions with representatives of
`
`plaintiff. To the extent that the claims include claims asserted therein or listed in any referenced
`
`schedule include matters and amounts claimed by plaintiff’s subcontractors or suppliers, the
`
`matters and amounts claimed are based on information provided by such subcontractors or
`
`suppliers.
`
`This verification is made by me because the plaintiff’s offices are located other than in
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark A. Rosen
`MARK A. ROSEN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 7
`
`
`
`8 of 8
`
`the County of New York.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`May 18, 2023
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`