throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`
`SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against -
`
`
`
`NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF
`ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`(Catskill Aqueduct Repair and Rehabilitation)
`
`
`
`To The Above-Named Defendants:
`
`
`
`Index No.
`Date Purchased:
`
`Plaintiff(s) designate (s) New York
`County as to the place of Trial
`
`The basis of the venue is location of
`Defendant’s Offices
`SUMMONS
`
`Plaintiff(s) reside(s) at:
`150 Meadowlands Parkway,
`Secaucus, NJ 07094
`
`YOU ARE SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve a copy of
`your Answer, or, if the Complaint is not served with this Summons, to serve a Notice of
`Appearance, on the plaintiff’s attorney(s) within twenty (20) days after the service of this
`Summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within thirty (30) days after the service is complete
`if this Summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case your
`failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded
`in the Complaint.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`May 18, 2023
`
`McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP
`225 Liberty Street, 36th Floor
`New York, New York 10281
`(212) 483-9490
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Mark A. Rosen
`Mark A. Rosen
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant’s Address:
`
`One Centre Street
`New York, New York 10007
`
`
`4789862_1
`
`1 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against -
`
`
`
`NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF
`ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
`
`
`Defendant.
`(Catskill Aqueduct Repair and Rehabilitation)
`
`Index No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, by its attorneys McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, as and for its
`
`verified complaint against defendant, alleges as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff Schiavone Construction Co. LLC (“Schiavone”) is a corporation duly
`
`authorized to conduct business in the State of New York.
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, defendant NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF
`
`ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (“DEP”) is a municipal agency duly organized and
`
`existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York with the ability to sue and be
`
`sued.
`
`3.
`
`That heretofore pursuant to public bidding and in compliance with the laws made
`
`and provided therefor, plaintiff entered into a written contract (“Contract”) with the DEP to
`
`perform the labor and furnish the equipment and material required for a project known as the
`
`Catskill Aqueduct Repair and Rehabilitation, Contract No. 20181427993 (“Project”).
`
`Said Contract was in all respects regularly executed and was in accordance with
`
`Thereafter, plaintiff entered into performance of the Contract and duly performed
`
`law.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`4769550_1
`
`2 of 8
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`all of the terms and conditions of the Contract on its part to be performed through the date of this
`
`complaint except as prevented by the defendant.
`
`6.
`
`On or about April 18, 2023, plaintiff duly filed a Notice of Claim with the
`
`Comptroller of the City of New York setting forth its claims.
`
`7.
`
`More than 30 days have elapsed since the filing of said notice of claim and
`
`before the commencement of this action, but defendant and said Comptroller has refused and
`
`neglected to pay or adjust plaintiff’s said claims.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`8.
`
`Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation set forth in
`
`paragraphs “1” through “7” of the complaint with the same force and effect as though fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff’s performance of its contract work has been substantially and materially
`
`disrupted, interfered with and delayed by circumstances uncontemplated by plaintiff which could
`
`not have been reasonably foreseen when the contract was bid and entered into and by
`
`affirmative, intentional or grossly intentional acts and bad faith by defendant, all of which
`
`constitute breaches of defendant’s fundamental obligations of the contract.
`
`10. DEP’s affirmative, intentional, bad faith or grossly negligent or uncontemplated
`
`acts and omissions constituting material breaches of fundamental obligations include, but are not
`
`limited to, the failure to provide access to the site; the issuance of inaccurate, incomplete and
`
`erroneous bid and design documents; the failure to provide a design that was appropriate for the
`
`project and free of design errors and omissions; the failure to properly assess and the
`
`misrepresentations of conditions at the site; the issuance of an excessive amount of design
`
`changes, extra work and change orders; the failure to timely issue and approve required re-
`
` 2
`
`
`
`3 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`designs necessary for the change orders and extra work and to allow the work to proceed; the
`
`failure to timely register change orders; the failure to properly assess hazardous environmental
`
`conditions at the site; the direction that respirators must be worn for biofilm removal; the
`
`addition of a fourth shutdown for the performance of remaining contract and additional change
`
`order work; the direction to suspend work.
`
`11.
`
` In addition, the project was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the rules
`
`and restrictions as to how work could proceed imposed by various government entities including,
`
`but not limited to, the DEP.
`
`12.
`
`That by reason of the affirmative, intentional or grossly negligent or
`
`uncontemplated acts and bad faith of the defendant constituting material breaches of fundamental
`
`obligations and the excessive Change Orders and redesigns, plaintiff was prevented from
`
`performing and completing the work in accordance with the schedule, phasing and sequencing
`
`set forth in the Contract Documents upon which plaintiff relied upon in preparing its bid for the
`
`Project and entering into the Contract.
`
`13.
`
`That by reason of the foregoing, plaintiff’s progress and performance of its work,
`
`as well as that of its subcontractors, was substantially interfered with and plaintiff was forced to
`
`perform in a non-sequential, disrupted, non-productive manner and the duration of the
`
`performance of the contract has been extended well beyond the original contract completion
`
`date.
`
`14. Defendant’s breaches and misrepresentations were deliberate, willful, reckless
`
`and grossly negligent and plaintiff, in bidding this contract based on the bid documents could not
`
`have anticipated or contemplated the long delays and interferences resulting from defendant’s
`
`improper performance of its contractual obligations.
`
` 3
`
`
`
`4 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`15.
`
`That as a result of the foregoing, plaintiff’s and its subcontractor’s, cost of
`
`performing the work was substantially and excessively increased beyond what it otherwise
`
`would have cost to complete the contract by reason of increased costs for labor, material, greatly
`
`extended field supervision and field overhead and general overhead costs.
`
`16.
`
`That by reason of the foregoing plaintiff has been damaged in a sum not less than
`
`$19,325,991.57 no part of which has been paid although duly demanded.
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff reserves its right to payment of all other monies due or to become due
`
`under the Contract for work performed or to be performed, including change orders for approved
`
`and disputed extra work, and the return of all bonds and other securities deposited to secure
`
`payment of monies retained under the Contract.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs “1” through “17” inclusive of the complaint with the same force and effect as though
`
`fully set forth herein.
`
`19.
`
`That in submitting its bid for the contract based upon the bid documents
`
`presented to it by the defendant, plaintiff contemplated that defendant’s plans and specifications
`
`would be accurate and adequate, that there would be no extensive redesigns of the work, that
`
`defendant would promptly determine any necessary changes in the plans and specifications, that
`
`defendant’s representations concerning the schedule and the work of other trades were
`
`substantially accurate and adequate, that defendant would provide plaintiff timely access to
`
`necessary areas of the site for the plaintiff’s work, that defendant would efficiently and
`
`effectively coordinate, supervise, schedule and progress the work with the various trades on the
`
`project, that defendant would not interfere with the performance, procedures and sequencing
`
` 4
`
`
`
`5 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`plaintiff reasonably anticipated utilizing, that defendant would allow plaintiff adequate and
`
`reasonable time to perform its work and issue appropriate and reasonable extensions of time and
`
`do all things required to enable plaintiff to perform its work expeditiously by normal and
`
`contemplated sequencing procedures and in accordance with the Contract Documents.
`
`20.
`
`That defendant has materially breached the contract by DEP’s affirmative,
`
`intentional, bad faith or grossly negligent or uncontemplated acts and omissions constituting
`
`material breaches of fundamental obligations include, but are not limited to, the failure to
`
`provide access to the site; the issuance of inaccurate, incomplete and erroneous bid and design
`
`documents; the failure to provide a design that was appropriate for the project and free of design
`
`errors and omissions; the failure to properly assess and the misrepresentations of conditions at
`
`the site; the issuance of an excessive amount of design changes, extra work and change orders;
`
`the failure to timely issue and approve required re-designs necessary for the change orders and
`
`extra work and to allow the work to proceed; the failure to timely register change orders; the
`
`failure to properly assess hazardous environmental conditions at the site; the direction that
`
`respirators must be worn for biofilm removal; the addition of a fourth shutdown for the
`
`performance of remaining contract and additional change order work; the direction to suspend
`
`work.
`
`21.
`
`That as a result of defendant’s aforesaid breaches of its contract obligations, there
`
`has been a material and cardinal change in the nature of the work, as contemplated by plaintiff.
`
`Plaintiff has been precluded from performing the work as and when contemplated when the
`
`contract was bid and plaintiff’s work has been caused to be extended well beyond the anticipated
`
`completion date.
`
`22.
`
`That by reason thereof plaintiff, and its subcontractors, have been subjected to
`
` 5
`
`
`
`6 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`substantial additional and otherwise unnecessary costs for labor, materials and equipment,
`
`greatly extended field supervision and field overhead and general office overhead not
`
`contemplated by plaintiff or its subcontractors in submitting their bids for the project.
`
`23.
`
`That as a result of the foregoing plaintiff has been damaged in an amount not less
`
`than $17 million no part of which has been paid although duly demanded.
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant in a sum not less than
`
`$19,325,991.57 on its First Cause of Action and in a sum not less than $17 million on its Second
`
`Cause of Action together with interest thereon, the costs and disbursements of this action and
`
`such other and further relief the Court deems proper.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`May 18 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`McELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY &
`CARPENTER, LLP
`
`By
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark A. Rosen
`Mark A. Rosen
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`225 Liberty Street, 36th Floor
`New York, New York 10281
`(212) 483-9490
`
`
`
`
`
` 6
`
`
`
`7 of 8
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2023 09:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 652404/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2023
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`Mark A. Rosen, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of
`
`New York, affirms the following under the penalties of perjury:
`
`I am a member of the firm of McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter LLP, attorney
`
`for the plaintiff herein.
`
`I have read the foregoing Complaint and know the contents thereof; and, the same is true
`
`on information and belief based on the corporate records and discussions with representatives of
`
`plaintiff. To the extent that the claims include claims asserted therein or listed in any referenced
`
`schedule include matters and amounts claimed by plaintiff’s subcontractors or suppliers, the
`
`matters and amounts claimed are based on information provided by such subcontractors or
`
`suppliers.
`
`This verification is made by me because the plaintiff’s offices are located other than in
`
`
`
`/s/ Mark A. Rosen
`MARK A. ROSEN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 7
`
`
`
`8 of 8
`
`the County of New York.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`May 18, 2023
`
`4769550_1
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket