throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`THREE
`R.P.
`SQUARE
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`THIRTY
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`SUMMONS
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`ASSOCIATES,
`TEN WEST
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`42-52 WEST
`FORTIETH
`
`LLC,
`
`20-136
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`TWENTY
`FORTY-FOUR
`EIGHTEEN
`KOFLER
`11 MADISON
`ASSOCIATES,
`NORTH ASSOCIATES,
`THIRTY
`THIRD
`ARCADE
`FORTY
`EIGHT
`BUILDING
`SEVEN
`39 STREET,
`ASSOCIATES,
`ONE TEN WEST
`411
`ASSOCIATES,
`4 BRYANT
`AVENUE
`PARK
`ASSOCIATES,
`WEST
`SQUARE
`16 MADISON
`ASSOCIATES,
`THE ARSENAL
`34 STREET,
`COMPANY,
`ANNEX
`THE ARSENAL
`1605 MAIN
`CORP.,
`39™ STREET
`WEST
`231/249
`ASSOCIATES,
`39™ STREET
`FASHION
`CORP.,
`ASSOCIATES,
`DEER
`LEFCOURT,
`LLC,
`TRU-UNION,
`LLC,
`11 DAYTON
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`AVENUE,
`LLC,
`LEFCOURT
`TERESHARAN
`CENTRAL,
`LLC,
`
`LLC,
`FIFTH
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`317 EAST
`
`LLC,
`STREET,
`231 WEST
`
`PARK
`
`LLC,
`REALTY,
`
`The Plaintiffs
`New York
`of
`place
`
`County
`trial.
`
`designate
`as the
`
`CORP.,
`
`The basis
`Plaintiffs'
`
`of venue
`principal
`
`business:
`
`.
`is
`place
`
`of
`
`411 5"¹ Avenue.
`New York, NY 10016
`
`-against-
`
`AFFILIATED
`
`FM INSURANCE
`
`COMPANY,
`
`------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`To the above-named
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`SUMMONED
`complaint
`
`the
`
`in this
`
`action
`and
`to
`serve
`
`a
`of
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`to answer
`to serve
`complaint
`the
`with
`your
`if
`a notice
`this
`is not
`served
`summons,
`answer,
`or,
`Plaintiffs'
`of
`after
`within
`on the
`exclusive
`this
`the service
`20 days
`summons,
`Attorney(s)
`if
`after
`(or within
`of service
`is complete
`this
`summons
`is not personally
`the service
`30 days
`of New York);
`in
`of
`your
`to appear
`or answer,
`within
`case
`failure
`to you
`the State
`and
`will
`be taken
`for
`the relief
`in the complaint.
`against
`you
`by default
`demanded
`
`of
`
`copy
`appearance,
`of
`the day
`delivered
`judgment
`
`Dated:
`
`New York,
`November
`
`New York
`12, 2020
`
`Defendant's
`
`address:
`
`270 Central
`
`Johnston,
`
`Avenue
`RI 02919
`
`P.C.
`
`WEG AND MYERS,
`for
`Attorneys
`Plaintiffs
`Federal
`Plaza
`2nd FlOOr
`52 Duane
`Street,
`New York
`New York,
`10007
`227-4210
`(212)
`
`1 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`ASSOCIATES,
`TEN WEST
`BUILDING
`
`TWENTY
`11 MADISON
`THIRTY
`THIRD
`
`THREE
`R.P.
`SQUARE
`
`FORTY
`39
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`20-136
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`FORTY-FOUR
`EIGHTEEN
`KOFLER
`ASSOCIATES,
`NORTH ASSOCIATES,
`ASSOCIATES,ARCADE
`ASSOCIATES,
`42-52 WEST
`EIGHT
`THIRTY
`SEVEN
`ASSOCIATES,
`FORTIETH
`ONE TEN WEST
`ASSOCIATES,
`LLC,
`STREET,
`AVENUE
`4 BRYANT
`PARK
`411
`FIFTH
`ASSOCIATES,
`SQUARE
`WEST
`MADISON
`ASSOCIATES,16
`317 EAST
`THE ARSENAL
`34 STREET,
`LLC,
`ANNEX
`THE ARSENAL
`1605 MAIN
`CORP.,
`39™ STREET
`WEST
`231/249
`ASSOCIATES,
`39™ STREET
`FASHION
`CORP.,
`ASSOCIATES,
`DEER
`LEFCOURT,
`LLC,
`TRU-UNION,
`LLC,
`11 DAYTON
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`AVENUE,
`LLC,
`LEFCOURT
`TERESHARAN
`CENTRAL,
`LLC,
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`COMPANY,
`STREET,
`231 WEST
`
`LLC,
`CORP.,
`
`PARK
`
`LLC,
`REALTY,
`
`-against-
`
`AFFILIATED
`
`FM INSURANCE
`
`COMPANY
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`FORTY-FOUR
`
`EIGHTEEN
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`TWENTY
`
`THREE
`
`R.P.
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`KOFLER
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`11 MADISON
`
`SQUARE
`
`NORTH
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`TEN WEST
`
`THIRTY
`
`THIRD
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`ARCADE
`
`BUILDING
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`FORTY
`
`EIGHT
`
`THIRTY
`
`SEVEN
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`42-52 WEST
`
`39 STREET,
`
`LLC,
`
`ONE TEN WEST
`
`FORTIETH
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`411
`
`FIFTH
`
`AVENUE
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`4 BRYANT
`
`PARK
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`16
`
`MADISON
`
`SQUARE
`
`WEST
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`317 EAST
`
`34 STREET,
`
`LLC,
`
`THE
`
`ARSENAL
`
`COMPANY,
`
`LLC,
`
`THE
`
`ARSENAL
`
`ANNEX
`
`CORP.,
`
`1605 MAIN
`
`STREET,
`
`LLC,
`
`231/249
`
`WEST
`
`39™ STREET
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`231
`
`WEST
`
`39™ STREET
`
`CORP.,
`
`FASHION
`
`2
`
`2 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`ASSOCIATES, LEFCOURT, LLC, TRU-UNION, LLC, DEER PARK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`
`11 DAYTON AVENUE, LLC, LEFCOURT CENTRAL, LLC, TERESHARAN REALTY,
`
`Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) by their attorneys WEG AND MYERS, P.C., as and for their Complaint
`
`herein allege as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiffs, together with their managing agent Adams & Company Real Estate,
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`LLC, manages and/or owns a large portfolio of real estate properties throughout New York.
`
`2.
`
`Like most property owners, out of concern for the general possibility of unforeseen
`
`loss, Plaintiffs procured insurance in order to protect its assets against fortuitous losses.
`
`3.
`
`Specifically, Plaintiffs procured an “all risk” insurance policy sold by Affiliated
`
`FM Insurance Company (“Affiliated FM”) which was in full force and effect when the Covid-19
`
`pandemic swept through the nation.
`
`4.
`
`The Covid-19 pandemic has caused physical loss or damage to high volume
`
`commercial tenants and retail businesses.
`
`5.
`
`In particular, in response to the damage being inflicted, and to protect the public
`
`from further exposure to infected areas, New York State and New York City both issued “stay at
`
`home” orders which prohibited Plaintiffs from continuing its normal business operations.
`
`6.
`
`As a result of the retail tenants being forced to shut their doors, they stopped paying
`
`rent, causing a substantial loss to Plaintiffs.
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiffs fully expected that, in light of the all-encompassing all-risk policy of
`
`insurance, Defendant would be responsive to their insurance claim.
`
`8.
`
`Defendant’s failure to provide Plaintiffs with coverage for losses sustained due to
`
`the outbreak of Covid-19 has forced Plaintiffs to bring this litigation.
`
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`PARTIES
`
`9.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Forty-Four Eighteen Associates was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`10.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Twenty Three R.P. Associates was a partnership
`
`registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`11.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Kofler Associates was a partnership registered
`
`in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`12.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 11 Madison Square North Associates was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`13.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Ten West Thirty Third Associates was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`14.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Arcade Building Associates was a partnership
`
`registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`15.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Forty Eight Thirty Seven Associates was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`16.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 42-52 West 39 Street, LLC, was a domestic
`
`limited liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New
`
`York, having its principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`
`
`4
`
`4 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`17.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, One Ten West Fortieth Associates, was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`18.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 411 Fifth Avenue Associates, was a partnership
`
`registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`19.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 4 Bryant Park Associates was a partnership
`
`registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`20.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 16 Madison Square West Associates was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`21.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 317 East 34 Street, LLC, was a domestic limited
`
`liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New York, having
`
`its principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`22.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, The Arsenal Company, LLC, was a domestic
`
`limited liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New
`
`York, having its principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`23.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, The Arsenal Annex Corp., was a domestic
`
`corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New York, having its
`
`principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`24.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 231/249 West 39th Street Associates was a
`
`partnership registered in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York,
`
`New York.
`
`
`
`5
`
`5 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`25.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 231 West 39th Street, Corp., was a domestic
`
`corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New York, having its
`
`principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`26.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Fashion Associates was a partnership registered
`
`in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`27.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, LEFCOURT, LLC, was a foreign limited
`
`liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of Florida and
`
`authorized to do business in the State of New York, having its principal place of business at 411
`
`5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`28.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, 11 Dayton Avenue, LLC, was a domestic
`
`limited liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New
`
`York, having its principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`29.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Lefcourt Central, LLC, was a domestic limited
`
`liability company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of New York, having
`
`its principal place of business at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`30.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Teresharan Realty was a partnership registered
`
`in the State of New York with an address at 411 5th Avenue, New York, New York.
`
`31.
`
`At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE
`
`COMPANY (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant or “Affiliated FM”) was and is a foreign
`
`corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of Rhode Island, having its
`
`principal place of business at 270 Central Avenue, Johnston, Rhode Island
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`6 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS AND ITS EFFECTS
`
`32.
`
`It is beyond cavil that the world is currently experiencing a global pandemic from
`
`a disease caused by a novel coronavirus (specifically, SARS-COV-2) and commonly referred to
`
`as Covid-19.
`
`33.
`
`From as early as December 2019, Covid-19 began spreading, first in China and
`
`then, because the disease is highly contagious, rapidly around the globe.
`
`34.
`
`The first confirmed case of the virus outside China was diagnosed on January 13,
`
`2020 in Bangkok, Thailand with the number of cases exceedingly increasing worldwide.
`
`35.
`
`On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared the Covid-
`
`19 outbreak constituted a public health emergency of international concern.
`
`36.
`
`Not only is SARS-COV-2 transmitted via human-to-human, but the WHO and
`
`scientific studies have confirmed that the virus can remain infectious on objects and surfaces.
`
`37.
`
`According to a study documented in The New England Journal of Medicine, Covid-
`
`19 was detectable in aerosols for up to 3 hours, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on
`
`cardboard, and up to 3 days on plastic and stainless steel.1
`
`38.
`
`Indeed, scientific studies suggest that individuals could get Covid-19 through
`
`indirect contact with surfaces or objects used by an infected person, regardless of whether the
`
`infected person was symptomatic.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`All of these materials are used and found throughout the insured premises.
`
`By February 25, 2020, the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”) warned Americans
`
`that the world was on the brink of a global pandemic, effectively dismantling any notion that
`
`SARS-COV-2 would not affect the population of the United States.
`
`
`1 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2004973
`
`
`
`7
`
`7 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`41.
`
`From that point forward, Covid-19 and its damaging consequences received wide
`
`spread media attention.
`
`42.
`
`As a result of this outbreak, the Center for Disease Control began recommending
`
`that individuals stay at home and those who are not sick engage in preventative measures such as
`
`constant hand washing and the avoidance of activities that would bring them in close proximity of
`
`people or surfaces where the virus resides.
`
`43.
`
`Given the nature of Plaintiffs’ business, the spread of the Covid-19 virus led to
`
`significant economic damages.
`
`44.
`
`These damages resulted from damage to and from within Plaintiffs’ insured
`
`premises as well as from premises within the vicinity of the insured locations.
`
`45.
`
`Such damage both existing on surfaces found within the insureds’ and surrounding
`
`premises as well as in the breathable air circulating within the insureds’ and surrounding premises.
`
`46.
`
`Human beings spread Covid-19 through the simple act of breathing in air that
`
`contains viral droplets. The New York Times recently reported that “[a]n infected person talking
`
`for five minutes in poorly ventilated space can also produce as many viral droplets as one infectious
`
`cough.2
`
`47. Moreover, studies have verified that many individuals remain asymptomatic
`
`despite infection by Covid-19.3
`
`
`2 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/14/science/coronavirus-transmission-cough-6-feet-arul.html
`3 https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2020-05-28/studies-detail-rates-of-
`asymptomatic-cases-of-coronavirus (observing that 42% of infected persons in Wuhan, China
`were asymptomatic).
`
`
`
`8
`
`8 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`48.
`
`Consequently, while it is possible to identify certain individuals who are suffering
`
`from obvious symptoms of the coronavirus, absent significant medical testing, it is impossible to
`
`distinguish between infected and non-infected members of the general public.
`
`49.
`
`Civil authority orders began to be issued by New York State and New York City
`
`which required properties to close their doors to the public.
`
`50.
`
`The basis of these orders were all predicated, in part, on the effect of the presence
`
`of Covid-19 within enclosed, highly trafficked locations.
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ INSURANCE POLICY AND CLAIM
`
`51.
`
`The commencement of this lawsuit results from a breach of insurance contract
`
`arising from the failure of Affiliated FM to provide payment to Plaintiffs for their losses resulting
`
`from the global pandemic commonly referred to as coronavirus beginning on or about March 17,
`
`2020, resulting in an economic loss that was first realized on or about April 1, 2020.
`
`52.
`
`On or about June 23, 2019, for good and valuable consideration, Plaintiffs procured
`
`a policy of insurance from Affiliated FM (the “Subject Policy”) bearing policy number KM984.
`
`53.
`
`The Subject Policy provides coverage for, inter alia, physical loss or damages, as
`
`well as losses of income due to business interruption.
`
`54.
`
`55.
`
`The Subject Policy bears effective dates from June 23, 2019 to June 23, 2020.
`
`The Subject Policy was in full force and effect as of June 23, 2019 and for the
`
`period of time immediately thereafter.
`
`56.
`
`The insuring clause of the Subject Policy provides in relevant part:
`
`This Policy covers property, as described in this Policy,
`against ALL RISKS OF PHYSICAL LOSS OR
`DAMAGE, except as hereinafter excluded, while located
`as described in this Policy.
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`9 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`57.
`
`The Subject Policy further provides coverage for Communicable Disease –
`
`Property Damage, specifically:
`
`If a described location owned, leased or rented by the
`Insured has the actual not suspected presence of
`communicable disease and access to such described
`location is limited, restricted or prohibited by:
`
`a) An order of an authorized governmental agency
`regulating or as a
`result of such presence of
`communicable disease; or
`
`b) A decision of an Officer of the Insured as a result of such
`presence of communicable disease,
`
`
`
`This Policy covers the reasonable and necessary costs
`incurred by the Insured at such described location for
`the:
`
`a) Cleanup, removal and disposal of such presence of
`communicable disease from insured property.
`
`The Subject Policy further provides coverage for losses resulting from interruption
`
`58.
`
`to Plaintiffs’ business, Specifically:
`
`B. BUSINESS INTERRUPTION COVERAGE
`
`(3) Rental Income
`
`The recoverable Rental Income is the actual loss
`sustained by the Insured of the following during the
`Period of Liability:
`
`a) The fair rental value of any portion of the property
`occupied by the Insured;
`
`b) Income reasonably expected from
`the rentals of
`unoccupied or unrented portions of such property;
`
`c) The rental income from the rented portions of such
`property, according to bona fide leases, contracts or
`agreements, in force at the time of the loss.
`
`10
`
`10 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`59.
`
`The Subject Policy provides Business Interruption Coverage Extensions
`
`specifically:
`
`(2) Civil or Military Authority
`
`This Policy covers the Business Interruption Coverage
`loss incurred by the Insured during the Period of Liability
`if an order of civil or military authority prohibits access
`to a location provided such order is the direct result of
`physical damage if the type insured at a location or within
`five (5) statute miles of it.
`
`(3) Communicable Disease – Business Interruption
`
`
`If a described location owned, leased or rented by the
`Insured has the actual not suspected presence of
`communicable disease and access to such described
`location is limited, restricted or prohibited by:
`
`a) an order of an authorized governmental agency
`regulating such presence of communicable disease;
`
`b) A decision of an Officer of the Insured as a result of such
`presence of communicable disease.
`
`This Policy covers the Business Interruption Coverage
`loss incurred by the Insured during the Period of Liability
`at such described location with such presence of
`communicable disease.
`
`(7) Extended Period of Liability
`
`
`The Gross Earnings and Rental Income coverage is
`extended to cover the reduction in sales resulting from:
`
`a) The interruption of business as covered by Gross
`Earnings or Rental Income;
`
`b) For such additional length of time as would be required
`with the exercise of due diligence and dispatch to restore
`the Insured’s business to the condition that would have
`existed had no loss happened; and
`
`c) Commencing with the date on which the liability of the
`Company for loss resulting from interruption of business
`
`11
`
`11 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`would terminate if this Business Interruption Coverage
`Extension had not been included in this Policy.
`
`(8) Ingress/Egress
`
`This Policy covers the Business Interruption Coverage
`loss incurred by the Insured due to the necessary
`interruption of the Insured’s business when ingress to or
`egress from a described
`location(s)
`is physically
`prevented, either partially or totally, as a direct result of
`physical loss or damage of the type insured to property of
`the type insured whether or not at a described location.
`
`The Subject Policy further provides coverage for Professional Fees, Specifically:
`
`60.
`
`This Policy covers the reasonable and necessary expenses
`incurred by the Insured of:
`
`b) Accountants;
`
`e) Other professionals; and
`
`f) The Insured’s own employees,
`
`For producing and certifying particulars or details to
`determine the amount of loss payable under this Policy
`for which this Company has accepted liability.
`
`No exclusion in the Policy applies to preclude coverage for the actual presence of
`
`61.
`
`Covid-19 at or away from Plaintiffs’ property, the physical loss and damage to the property/or the
`
`business interruption losses that have and will continue to result from the physical loss and damage
`
`to property.
`
`62.
`
`On or about April 13, 2020, Affiliated FM issued requests for information
`
`consisting of a questionnaire to be filled out by the Plaintiffs, asking for specific verified cases of
`
`Covid-19 on its premises.
`
`63.
`
`On or about August 12, 2020, Plaintiffs submitted a Sworn Statement in Proof of
`
`Loss, in connection with a claim for $23,757,712.00 in damages incurred between April 1, 2020
`
`through October, 2020, as projected.
`
`
`
`12
`
`12 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`64.
`
`Pursuant to Insurance Law § 216.6, Affiliated FM had 15 business days to accept
`
`or reject Plaintiffs’ claim.
`
`65.
`
`Notwithstanding the foregoing, Affiliated FM failed to accept or reject the claim
`
`submitted by Plaintiffs in a timely manner.
`
`Loss.
`
`66.
`
`67.
`
`To date Plaintiffs have not received a response to its Sworn Statement in Proof of
`
`Subsequent to the filing of its Sworn Statement in Proof of Loss, Plaintiffs have
`
`attempted to mitigate their damages in connection with the rental income loss suffered. As a result,
`
`Plaintiffs current damages for the applicable time period totals $16,386,172.00.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT
`(Breach of Contract)
`
`68.
`
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege paragraphs “1” through “67”, with the same force and
`
`effect as if set forth at length herein.
`
`FM.
`
`69.
`
`70.
`
`The Subject Policy constituted a binding contract between Plaintiffs and Affiliated
`
`Plaintiffs complied with all of their obligations under the Subject Policy, including
`
`through timely notification of a loss and the filing of a Sworn Statement in Proof of Loss.
`
`71.
`
`To date, Affiliated FM has failed to compensate Plaintiffs for any of their losses,
`
`which now totals $16,386,172.00.
`
`72.
`
`Affiliated FM’s failure to compensate Plaintiffs for their losses constitutes a breach
`
`of the Subject Policy.
`
`73.
`
`As a result of Affiliated FM’s breach of the Subject Policy, Plaintiffs have suffered
`
`damages in the amount of $16,386,172.00 together with such additional and subsequent damages
`
`as may be incurred and proven at trial.
`
`
`
`13
`
`13 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/13/2020 11:37 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 656260/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/13/2020
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Affiliated FM Insurance Company as
`
`follows:
`
`(a) On the First Cause of Action, a money judgment against Affiliated FM in the amount of
`
`$16,386,172.00, together with such additional and subsequent damages as may be
`
`proven at trial;
`
`Reasonable fees and costs of this action; and
`
`For such other and further relief as to which this Court deems just and proper.
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`November 12, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yours, etc.,
`
`WEG AND MYERS, P.C.
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Joshua L. Mallin
`
` Dennis D’Antonio, Esq.
` Joshua Mallin, Esq.
` Federal Plaza
` 52 Duane Street, 2nd Floor
` New York, New York 10007
` (212) 227-4210
`
`14
`
`14 of 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket