throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`--------
`ARNE
`
`HAUGHWOUT,
`
`COURT
`OF THE STATE
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Index
`
`X
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against
`
`-
`
`defendants'
`
`OF NEW YORK,
`ARCHDIOCESE
`and EDWARD
`CHURCH
`WEBER,
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`------------------------------
`
`Defendants•
`
`X
`
`Port
`
`To
`
`the
`
`above-named
`
`defendants:
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`
`of
`
`your
`
`answer
`
`or,
`
`SUMMONED
`complaint
`
`the
`
`if
`
`to
`
`answer
`
`the
`
`complaint
`
`is
`
`not
`
`served
`
`with
`
`a
`
`serve
`
`notice
`
`copy
`of
`
`appearance,
`
`on
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`Attorneys
`
`20
`
`days
`
`summons,
`summons
`
`this
`
`your
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`appear
`
`is
`
`not
`
`personally
`or
`
`answer,
`
`delivered
`
`judgement
`
`exclusive
`
`of
`
`the
`
`day
`
`of
`
`service
`
`(or
`
`within
`
`within
`30
`
`days
`
`after
`
`to
`
`you
`
`within
`
`the
`
`State
`
`will
`
`be
`
`taken
`
`for
`
`the
`
`relief
`
`the
`of New
`
`WAS FILED
`
`THE CLERK
`WITH
`IN COMPLIANCE
`
`SUMMONS
`A COPY OF THIS
`NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`ON
`AND 306(a).
`
`Dated:
`
`New
`
`August
`
`York,
`
`14,
`
`New
`
`2019
`
`York
`
`MERSON
`
`LAW,
`
`1 of 18
`
`By:
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`TO:
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`1011
`New
`
`ST.
`854
`
`Staten
`
`1st
`
`York,
`
`Avenue,
`New
`
`York
`
`10022
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`Targee
`
`Island,
`
`Street
`New
`
`York
`
`10304
`
`EDWARD WEBER
`Avenue
`452 Madison
`New
`New
`
`York,
`
`York
`
`10022
`
`2 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`
`---------------------------------------------------------X
`ARNE HAUGHWOUT,
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Index
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against
`
`-
`
`yggyyggo
`COMPLAINT
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`CHURCH,
`
`OF NEW YORK,
`and EDWARD WEBER
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`--------------------
`
`Defendant.
`--------------------------------
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`above
`
`named,
`
`complaining
`
`of
`
`the
`
`defendants,
`
`X
`
`by MERSON
`
`PLLC.,
`
`respectfully
`
`allege(s):
`
`NATURE
`
`OF THE CLAIM
`
`1.
`
`This
`
`is
`
`a
`
`case
`
`of
`
`plaintiff
`
`Arne
`
`Haughwout
`
`who
`
`was
`
`sexually
`
`Monsignor
`
`Edward
`
`Weber
`
`("Weber")
`
`at
`
`and
`
`of
`
`St.
`
`Sylvester
`
`Archdiocese
`
`ofNew
`
`York
`
`("Archdiocese").
`
`2.
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`a priest
`
`at
`
`St
`
`Sylvester
`
`Church
`
`in
`
`Staten
`
`Island,
`
`New York
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Archdiocese.
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`known
`
`among
`
`the
`
`community
`
`sexual
`
`predator.
`
`3.
`
`Despite
`
`the
`
`Archdiocese
`
`and
`
`Church's
`
`knowledge
`
`that
`
`Weber
`
`sexually
`
`and/or
`
`had
`
`the
`
`3 of 18
`propensity
`
`to
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children,
`
`the
`
`Archdiocese
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`penis,
`
`forcing
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to
`
`engage
`
`in
`
`oral
`
`sex,
`
`digitally
`
`penetrating
`
`sodomizing
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`anus
`
`and
`
`otherwise
`
`sexually
`
`abusing
`
`him.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`by Weber
`
`at
`
`least
`
`one
`
`hundred
`
`and
`
`Plaintiff
`
`brings
`
`this
`
`lawsuit
`
`to
`
`recover
`
`for
`
`the
`
`emotional
`
`and
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`endured
`
`because
`
`of
`
`the
`
`negligence
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Archdiocese
`
`of New York
`
`Church
`
`and
`
`to make
`
`sure
`
`no
`
`other
`
`child
`
`is
`
`forced
`
`to
`
`suffer
`
`the
`
`mental
`
`trauma
`
`he
`
`felt
`
`and
`
`continues
`
`to
`
`feel.
`
`PARTIES
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK was
`
`7.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned
`
`for
`
`profit
`
`corporation
`
`incorporated
`
`in
`
`the
`
`state
`
`of New York
`
`and
`
`the
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`8.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`located
`
`at
`
`1011
`
`1St
`
`Avenue,
`
`New York,
`
`New York
`
`10022.
`
`9.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`a
`
`priest
`
`operating
`
`under
`
`control
`
`of
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK,
`
`and
`
`and/or
`
`employees.
`
`10.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`an
`
`agent,
`
`servant
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK.
`
`11.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`4 of 18
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`13.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`defendant
`
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`was
`
`located
`
`at
`
`854
`
`Targee
`
`Street,
`
`Staten
`
`Island,
`
`New York
`
`10304.
`
`14.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`a priest
`
`operating
`
`under
`
`the
`
`direction
`
`and
`
`control
`
`of
`
`defendant
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH,
`
`and
`
`its
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees.
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`an
`
`servant
`
`and/or
`
`employee
`
`of
`
`15.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`agent,
`
`defendant
`
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH.
`
`16.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`defendants
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`and ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`were
`
`agents,
`
`servants,
`
`employees
`
`and/or
`
`alter
`
`egos
`
`of
`
`each
`
`other.
`
`FACTS
`
`OF THE CASE
`
`17.
`
`Defendants
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`and
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH's
`
`negligence
`
`and
`
`recklessness
`
`caused
`
`Weber
`
`to
`
`have
`
`access
`
`to
`
`children
`
`without
`
`knowledge
`
`that Weber
`
`supervision,
`
`including
`
`on
`
`Defendant's
`
`Premises,
`
`despite
`
`its
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`children
`
`and/or
`
`had
`
`the
`
`propensity
`
`to
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children
`
`and
`
`therefore
`
`are
`
`responsible
`
`for
`
`the
`
`injuries
`
`that
`
`Plaintiff
`
`incurred
`
`because
`
`but
`
`for
`
`Defendants
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`and
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH's
`
`negligence,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`have
`
`suffered
`
`the mental
`
`and
`
`physical
`
`anguish
`
`inflicted
`
`Defendant's
`
`gross
`
`wanton,
`
`and/or
`
`willful
`
`conduct
`
`by Weber.
`
`negligence,
`
`reckless,
`
`supports
`
`punitive
`
`liability.
`
`18.
`
`Weber
`
`sexually
`
`assaulted
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and many
`
`other
`
`young
`
`patrons
`
`of
`
`St.
`
`Sylvester
`
`Church
`
`in
`
`Staten
`
`Island,
`
`New
`
`York.
`
`Nonetheless,
`
`defendants
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF
`
`NEW YORK
`
`and
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`remove
`
`Weber
`
`from
`
`his
`
`position
`
`as a priest
`
`or
`
`to
`
`take
`
`any
`
`steps
`
`to
`
`keep
`
`the
`
`dangerous
`
`predator
`
`away
`
`from
`
`5 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`children.
`
`In
`
`fact,
`
`the
`
`Archdiocese
`
`and
`
`Church
`
`continued
`
`to
`
`allow,
`
`encourage
`
`and/or
`
`pennit
`
`Weber
`
`to have
`
`unfettered
`
`access
`
`to children,
`
`without
`
`proper
`
`supervision.
`
`19.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`herein
`
`mentioned,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`in foster
`
`care.
`
`20.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`foster
`
`home
`
`mandated
`
`that
`
`he
`
`attend
`
`church
`
`at St. Sylvester
`
`Church
`
`every
`
`Sunday
`
`where
`
`Weber
`
`was
`
`the
`
`priest.
`
`Weber
`
`led
`
`every
`
`Sunday
`
`mass
`
`Plaintiff
`
`attended.
`
`through
`
`Weber
`
`21.
`
`Beginning
`
`in
`
`or
`
`about
`
`1979
`
`and
`
`continuing
`
`approximately
`
`1983,
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`in
`
`the
`
`Rectory
`
`and
`
`Altar
`
`at St.
`
`Sylvester
`
`Church
`
`and
`
`other
`
`sexually
`
`venues.
`
`22.
`
`Weber
`
`requested
`
`Plaintiff
`
`stay
`
`after
`
`the mass
`
`and when
`
`he did, Weber
`
`began
`
`fondling,
`
`rubbing,
`
`and/or
`
`groping
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`penis.
`
`Weber
`
`then
`
`took
`
`his
`
`pants
`
`off
`
`and
`
`forced
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to perform
`
`oral
`
`sex
`
`on him.
`
`would
`
`also
`
`pin
`
`Plaintiff
`
`down
`
`so he could
`
`penetrated
`
`then
`
`23.
`
`Weber
`
`not move
`
`and
`
`digitally
`
`sodomized
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`anus
`
`until
`
`he
`
`ejaculated.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`cry
`
`and
`
`beg Weber
`
`to
`
`stop
`
`to no avail.
`
`24.
`
`When
`
`Plaintiff
`
`threatened
`
`to
`
`tell
`
`the
`
`police
`
`that Weber
`
`was
`
`sexually
`
`abusing
`
`him,
`
`Weber
`
`told
`
`Plaintiff
`
`if he ever
`
`told
`
`anyone
`
`about
`
`the
`
`abuse,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`would
`
`never
`
`see his
`
`twin
`
`brother
`
`again.
`
`25.
`
`Weber
`
`used
`
`his
`
`position
`
`of authority
`
`and
`
`power
`
`provided
`
`to him by
`
`the Archdiocese
`
`and
`
`and
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`Church
`
`in
`
`order
`
`to
`
`get
`
`Plaintiff
`
`alone
`
`and manipulate
`
`him
`
`into
`
`feeling
`
`helpless
`
`afraid
`
`so that
`
`he would
`
`not
`
`disclose
`
`the
`
`abuse.
`
`Weber
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`at
`
`least
`
`one
`
`hundred
`
`and
`
`fifty
`
`times.
`
`As
`
`such,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`suffered
`
`catastrophic
`
`and
`
`lifelong
`
`injuries
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`and
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH's
`
`negligence
`
`in undertaking
`
`a duty,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to in locis
`
`parentis,
`
`in failing
`
`to protect
`
`6 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`the
`
`children
`
`of
`
`its
`
`parishes
`
`and
`
`of
`
`its
`
`community
`
`safe
`
`from
`
`Archdiocese
`
`having
`
`knowledge
`
`that
`
`Weber
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`propensity
`
`to
`
`sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children,
`
`and/or
`
`allowing
`
`Weber
`
`position
`
`of
`
`authority
`
`and
`
`power,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Archdiocese
`
`and
`
`Church
`
`supervise
`
`Weber.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`FOR NEGLIGENCE
`
`AGAINST
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`28.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`repeat,
`
`reiterate
`
`and
`
`reallege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as
`
`if
`
`hereinafter
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`At
`
`times
`
`mentioned
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`29.
`
`all
`
`herein,
`
`duty
`
`of
`
`care,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to
`
`in
`
`locis
`
`parentis,
`
`to
`
`keep
`
`students
`
`and
`
`children
`
`of
`
`its
`
`parishes,
`
`including
`
`plaintiff
`
`safe
`
`from
`
`clergymen
`
`under
`
`its
`
`supervision
`
`and
`
`control,
`
`including
`
`on
`
`company
`
`ultimately
`
`befell
`
`the
`
`plaintiff,
`
`and
`
`they
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to
`
`supervise
`
`Weber.
`
`30.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`mentioned
`
`herein,
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`its
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees
`
`breached
`
`the
`
`above-stated
`
`reckless,
`
`willful
`
`and
`
`wanton
`
`manner,
`
`and
`
`caused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`to
`
`be
`
`sexually
`
`31.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`7 of 18
`negligence
`the
`
`of
`
`of
`
`defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`32.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`defendants
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`33.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`punitive
`
`damages
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`34.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the
`
`jurisdiction
`
`of
`
`all
`
`lower
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`35.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`exceptions
`
`to
`
`Article
`
`16
`
`of
`
`the
`
`C.P.L.R.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND
`CAUSE
`AND SUPERVISION
`RETENTION
`
`OF ACTION
`AGAINST
`
`FOR NEGLIGENT
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`36.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`reiterates
`
`and
`
`each
`
`and
`
`repeats,
`
`realleges
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as
`
`if
`
`hereinafter
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`37.
`
`Defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK,
`
`had
`
`a
`
`duty
`
`to
`
`known
`
`risks
`
`of
`
`harm
`
`to
`
`the
`
`young
`
`patrons,
`
`students
`
`and
`
`children
`
`including
`
`plaintiff
`
`by
`
`its
`
`clergymen.
`
`38.
`
`Defendant
`
`was
`
`negligent
`
`in
`
`hiring,
`
`retaining
`
`and
`
`supervising
`
`their
`
`Weber,
`
`who
`
`were
`
`careless,
`
`unskillful,
`
`negligent,
`
`reckless
`
`and
`
`wanton
`
`manner
`
`in
`
`not
`
`possessing
`
`the
`
`requisite
`
`knowledge
`
`and
`
`skill
`
`officials
`
`and
`
`church
`other
`8 of 18
`
`supervisors
`
`who
`
`should
`
`have
`
`properly
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`anguish
`
`and/or
`
`physical
`
`manifestations
`
`thereof,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`losses,
`
`as
`
`of
`
`yet
`
`been
`
`ascertained.
`
`41.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`defendants
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`42.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`punitive
`
`damages
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`43.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the
`
`jurisdiction
`
`of
`
`all
`
`lower
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`exceptions
`
`16
`
`of
`
`the
`
`C.P.L.R.
`
`44.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`to
`
`Article
`
`AS AND FOR THE THIRD
`CAUSE
`OF EMOTIONAL
`DISTRESS
`
`FOR NEGLIGENT
`OF ACTION
`ARCHDIOCESE
`AGAINST
`
`45.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`l.
`
`through
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as
`
`if
`
`herein
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`and
`
`their
`
`employees,
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`the
`
`failure
`
`supervise
`
`and
`
`hire
`
`Weber
`
`the
`
`priest
`
`who
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`proximately
`
`result
`
`in
`
`physical
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`to
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`47.
`
`Defendant
`
`ARCHDIOCESE
`9 of 18
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`and
`
`their
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`49.
`
`Despite
`
`said
`
`knowledge,
`
`power
`
`and
`
`duty,
`
`defendant
`
`negligently
`
`stop,
`
`prevent,
`
`and
`
`prohibit
`
`the
`
`improper
`
`conduct
`
`that
`
`resulted
`
`in Weber
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`50.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`defendants
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`51.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`punitive
`
`damages
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`52.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the
`
`jurisdiction
`
`of
`
`all
`
`lower
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`16
`
`of
`
`the
`
`C.P.L.R.
`
`53.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`exceptions
`
`to
`
`Article
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`FOR NEGLIGENCE
`
`AGAINST
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`54.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`repeat,
`
`reiterate
`
`and
`
`reallege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as
`
`if
`
`hereinafter
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`55.
`
`At
`
`all
`
`times
`
`mentioned
`
`herein,
`
`defendant
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to
`
`in
`
`locis
`
`parentis,
`
`to
`
`keep
`
`the
`
`young
`
`children
`
`of
`
`its
`
`parishes,
`
`including
`
`plaintiff
`
`safe
`
`from
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`under
`
`its
`
`10 of 18
`supervision
`
`and
`
`control,
`
`including
`
`on
`
`company
`
`premises,
`
`

`

`I
`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`57.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`negligence
`
`of
`
`defendant
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`and/or
`
`its
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`plaintiffs
`
`were
`
`caused
`
`serious
`
`personal
`
`injuries,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`mental
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering,
`
`mental
`
`anguish
`
`and/or
`
`physical
`
`manifestations
`
`thereof,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`losses,
`
`all
`
`of
`
`which
`
`have
`
`not
`
`as
`
`of
`
`yet
`
`been
`
`ascertained.
`
`58.
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`By
`
`foregoing,
`
`compensatory
`
`defendants
`
`in such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`fmd
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`59.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is entitled
`
`to punitive
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendants
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`60.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdiction
`
`of all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`61.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`exceptions
`
`to Article
`
`16 of
`
`the C.P.L.R.
`
`OF ACTION
`AGAINST
`
`HIRING,
`CHURCH
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`CAUSE
`AND SUPERVISION
`RETENTION
`
`FOR NEGLIGENT
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`62.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in
`
`those
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`61.,
`
`inclusive,
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if hereinafter
`
`set
`
`froth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`63.
`
`Defendant
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH,
`
`had
`
`a duty
`
`to
`
`supervise
`
`and
`
`prevent
`
`known
`
`risks
`
`of harm
`
`to the
`
`young
`
`patrons
`
`of
`
`its parishes
`
`by
`
`its
`
`clergymen.
`
`negligent
`
`in
`
`64.
`
`Defendant
`
`was
`
`hiring,
`
`retaining
`
`and
`
`supervising
`
`their
`
`personnel,
`
`such
`
`as
`
`Weber,
`
`who
`
`were
`
`careless,
`
`unskillful,
`
`negligent,
`
`reckless
`
`and
`
`acted
`
`in
`
`a willful
`
`and
`
`wanton
`
`manner
`
`in not
`
`possessing
`
`the
`
`requisite
`
`knowledge
`
`and
`
`skill
`
`of priests
`
`and
`
`church
`
`officials
`
`and
`
`other
`
`church
`
`supervisors
`
`who
`
`should
`
`have
`
`properly
`
`been
`
`supervising
`
`the
`
`priests
`
`and
`
`church
`
`officials
`
`to ensure
`
`the
`
`safety
`
`of
`
`the
`
`children
`
`of
`
`its parishes.
`
`11 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`65.
`
`Defendant
`
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`Weber
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`and/or
`
`had
`
`the propensity
`
`to sexually
`
`abuse
`
`children
`
`and
`
`did
`
`nothing
`
`to stop
`
`it.
`
`66.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of
`
`such
`
`negligent
`
`hiring,
`
`supervising
`
`and
`
`retention,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`to
`
`suffer
`
`serious
`
`personal
`
`injuries,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`conscious
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering,
`
`mental
`
`anguish
`
`and/or
`
`physical
`
`manifestations
`
`thereof,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`losses,
`
`all
`
`of which
`
`have
`
`not
`
`been
`
`as of yet
`
`ascertained.
`
`67.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendants
`
`in such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`68.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is entitled
`
`to punitive
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendants
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`69.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdiction
`
`of all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`within
`
`70.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`exceptions
`
`to Article
`
`16 of
`
`the C.P.L.R.
`
`AS AND FOR THE SIXTH
`OF EMOTIONAL
`
`CAUSE
`DISTRESS
`
`OF ACTION
`AGAINST
`
`FOR NEGLIGENT
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`INFLICTION
`CHURCH
`
`.
`
`71.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in
`
`those
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`70.,
`
`inclusive,
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if herein
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`72.
`
`Defendant
`
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`and
`
`their
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`the
`
`failure
`
`reasonably
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`to properly
`
`advise,
`
`supervise
`
`and
`
`hire Weber
`
`the
`
`priest
`
`who
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`would
`
`and
`
`did
`
`proximately
`
`result
`
`in
`
`physical
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`73.
`
`Defendant
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`CHURCH
`
`and
`
`their
`
`agents,
`
`servants
`
`and/or
`
`employees
`
`knew
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`the
`
`sexual
`
`abuse
`
`and
`
`other
`
`improper
`
`conduct
`
`would
`
`and
`
`did
`
`proximately
`
`result
`
`in physical
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`12 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`74.
`
`Defendant
`
`has
`
`the
`
`power,
`
`ability,
`
`authority
`
`and
`
`duty
`
`to
`
`intervene
`
`with
`
`and/or
`
`stop
`
`the
`
`improper
`
`conduct
`
`that
`
`resulted
`
`in Plaintiff
`
`being
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`by Weber.
`
`75.
`
`Despite
`
`said
`
`knowledge,
`
`power
`
`and
`
`duty,
`
`defendant
`
`negligently
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`act
`
`so as to
`
`stop,
`
`prevent,
`
`and
`
`prohibit
`
`the
`
`improper
`
`conduct
`
`that
`
`resulted
`
`in Weber
`
`sexually
`
`abusing
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`76.
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is
`
`By
`
`foregoing,
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendants
`
`in such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`77.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is entitled
`
`to punitive
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendants
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate.
`
`78.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdiction
`
`of all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`79.
`
`action
`
`within
`
`exceptions
`
`to Article
`
`This
`
`falls
`
`16 of
`
`the C.P.L.R.
`
`AS AND FOR THE SEVENTH
`CAUSE
`AS TO EDWARD
`
`OF ACTION
`WEBER
`
`FOR ASSAULT
`
`80.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in
`
`those
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`79.,
`
`inclusive,
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if herein
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`81.
`
`Defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER's
`
`predatory,
`
`abusive,
`
`manipulative
`
`and
`
`unlawful
`
`acts
`
`against
`
`created
`
`a reasonable
`
`in Plaintiff
`
`of
`
`immediate
`
`harmful
`
`or
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`apprehension
`
`offensive
`
`contact
`
`to
`
`plaintiff's
`
`person,
`
`all
`
`of
`
`which
`
`were
`
`done
`
`intentionally
`
`by
`
`defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`to plaintiff
`
`without
`
`plaintiff's
`
`consent.
`
`82.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`aforementioned
`
`assault,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`sustained
`
`in
`
`the
`
`past,
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to
`
`sustain
`
`in
`
`the
`
`future,
`
`serious
`
`and
`
`severe
`
`psychological
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`mental
`
`anguish,
`
`embarrassment
`
`and
`
`humiliation.
`
`13 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`83.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`aforementioned
`
`assaults,
`
`plaintiff
`
`has
`
`incurred
`
`medical
`
`expenses
`
`and
`
`other
`
`economic
`
`damages,
`
`and will
`
`now
`
`be
`
`obligated
`
`to
`
`expend
`
`sums
`
`of money
`
`for medical
`
`care
`
`and
`
`attention
`
`in
`
`effort
`
`to
`
`cure
`
`himself
`
`of
`
`his
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`to
`
`alleviate
`
`his
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering,
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`mental
`
`anguish,
`
`embarrassment
`
`and
`
`humiliation.
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`84.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`plaintiff
`
`compensatory
`
`defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`in such
`
`sums
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`plaintiff
`
`is
`
`further
`
`entitled
`
`to punitive
`
`and
`
`exemplary
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`appropriate
`
`to
`
`deter
`
`said
`
`defendant
`
`and
`
`others
`
`from
`
`future
`
`similar
`
`misconduct.
`
`sought
`
`the jurisdiction
`
`of all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`85.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`exceeds
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`86.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`exceptions
`
`to Article
`
`16 of
`
`the C.P.L.R.
`
`AS AND FOR THE EIGHTH
`CAUSE
`AS TO EDWARD
`
`OF ACTION
`WEBER
`
`FOR BATTERY
`
`87.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in
`
`those
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`this
`
`Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`86.,
`
`inclusive,
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if herein
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`was
`
`eleven
`
`years
`
`defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`88.
`
`When
`
`Plaintiff
`
`approximately
`
`old,
`
`intentionally
`
`and
`
`unlawfully
`
`sexually
`
`abused
`
`Plaintiff
`
`by
`
`rubbing,
`
`fondling
`
`and/or
`
`groping
`
`his
`
`penis,
`
`and
`
`digitally
`
`and
`
`otherwise
`
`sodomizing
`
`plaintiff's
`
`anus.
`
`89.
`
`Defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`unlawful,
`
`abusive,
`
`manipulative,
`
`and
`
`predatory
`
`acts
`
`against
`
`plaintiff,
`
`amounted
`
`to
`
`a series
`
`of
`
`harmful
`
`and
`
`offensive
`
`contacts
`
`to
`
`plaintiff's
`
`person
`
`all
`
`of which
`
`were
`
`done
`
`intentionally
`
`by
`
`defendant
`
`to plaintiff
`
`without
`
`plaintiff's
`
`consent.
`
`14 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`90.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`aforementioned
`
`batteries,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has
`
`sustainec
`
`in
`
`the
`
`past,
`
`and
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`to
`
`sustain
`
`in
`
`the
`
`future,
`
`psychological
`
`injury,
`
`pain
`
`anc
`
`suffering,
`
`serious
`
`and
`
`severe
`
`psychological
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`distress,
`
`mental
`
`anguish
`
`embarrassment
`
`and
`
`humiliation.
`
`91.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`plaintiff
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`compensatory
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`in such
`
`sums
`
`a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`adequate,
`
`and
`
`plaintiff
`
`is
`
`further
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`punitive
`
`and
`
`exemplary
`
`damages
`
`from
`
`defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`in
`
`such
`
`sums
`
`as a jury
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`just
`
`and
`
`appropriate
`
`to
`
`deter
`
`said
`
`defendant
`
`and
`
`others
`
`from
`
`future
`
`similar
`
`misconduct.
`
`The
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdiction
`
`of all
`
`lower
`
`courts
`
`which
`
`would
`
`92.
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`93.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`exceptions
`
`to Article
`
`16 of
`
`the C.P.L.R.
`
`AS FOR A NINTH
`CAUSE
`OF EMOTIONAL
`
`OF ACTION
`DISTRESS
`
`FOR INTENTIONAL
`INFLICTION
`EDWARD WEBER
`AGAINST
`
`94.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats
`
`reiterates,
`
`and
`
`reallages
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in
`
`those
`
`paragraphs
`
`of
`
`the Complaint
`
`marked
`
`and
`
`designated
`
`1.
`
`through
`
`93.,
`
`inclusive,
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if hereafter
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length.
`
`Defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`engaged
`
`conduct
`
`towards
`
`with
`
`95.
`
`in outrageous
`
`plaintiff
`
`the
`
`intention
`
`to cause,
`
`or with
`
`reckless
`
`disregard
`
`for
`
`the
`
`probability
`
`of
`
`causing,
`
`plaintiff
`
`to
`
`suffer
`
`severe
`
`emotional
`
`distress
`
`by
`
`sexually
`
`assaulting
`
`him
`
`while
`
`he was
`
`an
`
`child
`
`patron
`
`at and
`
`of St. Sylvester
`
`Church.
`
`96.
`
`As
`
`a proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`aforementioned
`
`assaults,
`
`batteries,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`violations
`
`committed
`
`against
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`he
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`and
`
`continues
`
`to
`
`suffer
`
`extreme
`
`mental
`
`15 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`distress,
`
`humiliation,
`
`anguish,
`
`and
`
`emotional
`
`and
`
`physical
`
`injuries,
`
`losses,
`
`all
`
`his
`
`damage
`
`in
`
`amounts
`
`to
`
`be
`
`proven
`
`at
`
`trial.
`
`97.
`
`Defendant
`
`EDWARD
`
`WEBER
`
`committed
`
`the
`
`acts
`
`alleged
`
`fraudulently,
`
`and
`
`oppressively
`
`with
`
`the
`
`wrongful
`
`intention
`
`of
`
`improper
`
`and
`
`evil
`
`motive
`
`amounting
`
`to malice
`
`and
`
`in
`
`conscious
`
`rights,
`
`entitling
`
`plaintiff
`
`to
`
`recover
`
`punitive
`
`damages
`
`in
`
`amounts
`
`amount
`
`98.
`
`The
`
`of
`
`damages
`
`sought
`
`exceeds
`
`the
`
`jurisdiction
`
`of
`
`all
`
`otherwise
`
`have
`
`jurisdiction.
`
`99.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`falls
`
`within
`
`the
`
`exceptions
`
`to
`
`Article
`
`16
`
`of
`
`the
`
`C.P.L.R.
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`plaintiff
`
`demands
`
`judgement
`
`against
`
`defendant
`
`would
`
`find
`
`fair,
`
`adequate
`
`and
`
`just.
`
`Dated:
`
`New
`
`August
`
`York,
`
`14,
`
`New
`2019
`
`York
`
`16 of 18
`
`MERSON
`
`Jo7danÝ.
`
`ivIerson
`
`Sarah
`
`R.
`
`Cantos
`
`for
`58th
`
`New
`
`Attorneys
`
`150
`East
`New York,
`603-9100
`
`(212)
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`-----------------------------
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`---------------------X
`
`ARNE HAUGHWOUT,
`
`-against
`
`-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ATTORNEY
`VERIFICATION
`
`OF NEW YORK,
`ARCHDIOCESE
`and EDWARD WEBER
`CHURCH
`
`ST.
`
`SYLVESTER
`
`_____________---___----------------------------------X
`JORDAN
`K. MERSON,
`
`an
`
`attorney
`
`duly
`
`admitted
`
`to
`
`practice
`
`in
`
`Defendant.
`
`State,
`
`and
`
`a member
`
`of
`
`the
`
`firm
`
`MERSON
`
`LAW,
`
`PLLC.,
`
`attorneys
`
`the
`
`within
`
`action,
`
`hereby
`
`affirms
`
`under
`
`penalty
`
`of
`
`perjury:
`
`That
`
`he
`
`has
`
`read
`
`the
`
`within
`
`complaint
`
`and
`
`knows
`
`the
`
`contents
`
`same
`
`own
`
`except
`
`matters
`
`therein
`
`is
`
`true
`
`to
`
`his
`
`knowledge,
`
`as
`
`to
`
`the
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`and
`
`that
`
`as
`
`to
`
`those
`
`matters
`
`he
`
`believes
`
`it
`
`to
`
`be
`
`That
`
`the
`
`sources
`
`of
`
`his
`
`information
`
`and
`
`knowledge
`
`are
`
`investigations
`
`the
`
`file.
`
`That
`
`the
`
`reason
`
`this
`
`verification
`
`is made
`
`by
`
`affirmant
`
`and
`
`not
`
`the
`
`plaintiff
`
`is
`
`not
`
`within
`
`the
`
`County
`
`where
`
`the
`
`attorney
`
`has
`
`his
`
`office.
`
`17 of 18
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2019 12:32 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 950005/2019
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2019
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`Year
`
`2019
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`COURT
`OF THE
`OF NEWYORK
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`ARNE HAUGHWOUT,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against
`
`-
`
`OF NEW YORK,
`ARCHDIOCESE
`CHURCH
`and EDWARD
`WEBER,
`
`ST. SYLVESTER
`
`Defendants.
`
`__
`
`SUMMONS
`
`AND VERIFIED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Merson
`
`Law,
`
`PLLC.
`
`.titornepfè>r PlaintitRs.,
`
`Office and l½st OtTice.tddress. leieplwne
`34"'
`5862 Street
`F1.
`150 East
`New York,
`New York
`10155
`603-9100
`(212)
`
`To:
`
`All
`
`Parties
`
`18 of 18
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket