FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 10:04 AM
`FILED? ONEIDA'ICOUNTY' CLERK 0411-12017 10:‘04‘AM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`>
`
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`I DE’X’NO- 33FCA2016—002902
`
`
`
`
`
`RnCnIVnD NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`VSUPREMEJCOURTA
`
`COUNTY=OE ONEIDA
`
`In‘the.Matter 0f the Application.of
`
`APPLE PROPERTY GROUPELLQ,
`
`,
`‘
`Bet1tioner,
`
`ORDER
`'
`
`-again$t-
`
`_
`CITY OE‘UTICA, New YORK end.
`DAVID H. WILLIAMS, Assessor.of'the
`City of Utica, New York”
`'
`
`'
`
`‘Index No; EFCAzols—ZQOZ
`iRJI No¢i32416—0857
`'Judge,Hesper~
`
`Respondents.
`
`To review a certain real property
`assessment‘for.the-assessment=roll
`
`(year’zols under Article 7 of the
`iReal Property Tax Law;
`
`The above—entitled proceeding having been brought by Petitioner to
`
`preducefthe'assessment,made by Respondents for the purpose of taxation fOr
`
`the year 2016 with respect to Petitionerfs real property ("Petitioner‘s
`
`-Pr9p¢rtY"l located'in the CitY'0£ Utica: CQunty'of Gneida, State 0: New
`
`York and described.and assessed on Ehe 2016 assessment rolls of the City
`
`of Utica, New Yorkaas follows:
`
`‘PROPERTY IwD.
`
`‘
`
`=TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE
`
`‘221 School ROad
`_307,14—2+29;,and
`
`$45}000,00
`
`-Petitioner and ReSPondents. by Stipulation'entered into between than
`respective attorneys dated ..MQ_.;H
`‘;ES‘,
`
`
`2017; which
`
`and 1their
`
`'Stipulation is annexed hereto,'having stipulated that the assessment for
`
`Petitioner's Property be reduced on.Respondent City of Utioa! New York's
`
`2016 assessment.rOlls,
`
`NOW; upon reading_and filing the aforeSaid Stipulation, it 13
`
`On Motion of COhen-& Cohenn attorneys for Petitioner,
`
`1
`
`Filed In Oneida County Clerks Office
`
`4/11/20171 15:54:45 AM Index # EFCA2016-002002
`1 of 6
`
`
`FILED? ONEIDA'ICOUNTY' CLERK 0411-12017 10:‘04‘AM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`>
`
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`I DE’X’NO- 33FCA2016—002902
`
`
`
`
`
`RnCnIVnD NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`VSUPREMEJCOURTA
`
`COUNTY=OE ONEIDA
`
`In‘the.Matter 0f the Application.of
`
`APPLE PROPERTY GROUPELLQ,
`
`,
`‘
`Bet1tioner,
`
`ORDER
`'
`
`-again$t-
`
`_
`CITY OE‘UTICA, New YORK end.
`DAVID H. WILLIAMS, Assessor.of'the
`City of Utica, New York”
`'
`
`'
`
`‘Index No; EFCAzols—ZQOZ
`iRJI No¢i32416—0857
`'Judge,Hesper~
`
`Respondents.
`
`To review a certain real property
`assessment‘for.the-assessment=roll
`
`(year’zols under Article 7 of the
`iReal Property Tax Law;
`
`The above—entitled proceeding having been brought by Petitioner to
`
`preducefthe'assessment,made by Respondents for the purpose of taxation fOr
`
`the year 2016 with respect to Petitionerfs real property ("Petitioner‘s
`
`-Pr9p¢rtY"l located'in the CitY'0£ Utica: CQunty'of Gneida, State 0: New
`
`York and described.and assessed on Ehe 2016 assessment rolls of the City
`
`of Utica, New Yorkaas follows:
`
`‘PROPERTY IwD.
`
`‘
`
`=TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE
`
`‘221 School ROad
`_307,14—2+29;,and
`
`$45}000,00
`
`-Petitioner and ReSPondents. by Stipulation'entered into between than
`respective attorneys dated ..MQ_.;H
`‘;ES‘,
`
`
`2017; which
`
`and 1their
`
`'Stipulation is annexed hereto,'having stipulated that the assessment for
`
`Petitioner's Property be reduced on.Respondent City of Utioa! New York's
`
`2016 assessment.rOlls,
`
`NOW; upon reading_and filing the aforeSaid Stipulation, it 13
`
`On Motion of COhen-& Cohenn attorneys for Petitioner,
`
`1
`
`Filed In Oneida County Clerks Office
`
`4/11/20171 15:54:45 AM Index # EFCA2016-002002
`1 of 6
`
`
`
`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 10:04 AM
`! FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY C'LERK'04m2017 10:04 AM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`1 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`_I DEX NO- 13F€A2016"-002002
`
`
`
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`RnCnIVnD NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`‘ORDERED,
`
`that
`
`the aforesaid assessment eStablished on the‘2016
`
`assessment rolls of the City ofi'Utica, New'Yofik for Petitioner’s Propexty
`
`in the City of Utica, New York shall be, and the'same hereby is,
`
`reduced
`
`asvfo11ows:
`
`_PROPERTY‘I.DQ
`
`TOTAL ASSESSED VALUEV
`
`221chhool Read
`307.14-2—29; and
`
`'
`
`$40,320,00
`
`and as so reduced, Shall be, ahd hereby is; confirmed, and it is further
`
`ORDERED;
`
`that the-Officers haVifig custody of the 2016 asseSSment
`
`r6113 cf the City of Utica, Neerork-shall forthwith correct_the said
`
`entries On such rolls in conformity with this.Order and shall nope‘upon
`
`the margin of Spoh rolls opposite suoh entry'tpat
`
`the same has been
`
`1corrected by the apthozizafiion'of this Ordepz and-it is further
`
`ORDERED, that Petitioner shall be entitled to a refund of any real
`
`‘estate taxes paid ’by Petitioner Abased. on the amount
`
`,by which the
`
`‘assessmentsestablished.on the 2016 City of Utica, New York's assessment
`:rolls for Petitionep's Property befose its reductionsas proVided ih this
`
`order eXCeeds
`
`the assessment Of Petitioner's aforesaid real preperty
`
`ifollofiiné‘SUCh redUCtion.as provided in thiS‘Order, provided, howeVer,
`each municipality 9r Other governmental'entiiy'ebliéated'tQ provide a
`
`'refund shall have the option;
`
`instead of'making'paymefit of such.refhnd
`
`directly to,Petitioner; £0 provide the refund in the;f0rm of:ajpayme5t
`
`credit! until credit ih fall has been made] upon.eaeh real estate-tax,
`
`'hereafter'leVied upon Petitionerls Property by eaCh.such municipality or'
`
`Other gdvernmental entity; and it is fupther
`
`ORDERED;
`
`that, except-as permitted by Real Property Tax Law section
`
`727,
`
`the assessed valuation‘of Petitioner's Property as reduced hereby
`
`20f6'
`2 of 6
`
`‘—
`
`
`
`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 10:04 AM
`'FIiED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 041:12017'10:04*A “3
`
`
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`
`
`I DEX NO. EFCAZOlG-OOZOOZ
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`
`
`
`
`RnCnIVnD NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`
`
`shall not be changed by ReSpondentSI‘and no applicati9n.f°r-a reductiQH
`
`of each reduced assessment shall be sought by Petitioner; for the next
`
`three succeeding=assessmentjrolls prepared on the basis of the three
`
`taxable status dates next occurring on or after the taxable status date
`,of the 2016 assessment under review-ia this proceeding, afid all tax bills
`fhereafterx185ued by_afiy takihgisurisdidtion_with respect to.Petitionerfs
`
`iProperty;
`
`‘while ithe
`
`foregOing pfOVisions prohibiting. change .arergso
`
`applicable, Shall be based_on the reduced assessment, and it is-further
`
`ORDERED.
`
`that:Petitioner shall not.be entitled.tocrecgver the costs
`
`‘and disbursements of this proceeding,
`
`Dated:
`
`RQmer NewVXQrk
`‘
`
`,
`2017
`
`
`
`3of6
`3 of 6
`
`
`
`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 10:04 AM
`FILED: ONEIIA COUNTY CLERK04m2017 10:04 AM
`
`. NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`I DEXNO- BFWOW-002002:
`
`
`
`
`RnCnIVnD NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`
`
`STATE OF NEW YORK-
`‘SUPREME'COURT‘
`
`‘
`.
`,
`COUNTY OF ONEIDA‘
`
`Ih the Matter Of the Application of
`
`APPLE'PROPERTY GROUP LLC,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`-—againSt-
`
`SETTLEMENT.STIPULATION
`
`CITY OF UTICALENEW‘YORK-andl
`wDAVID H. WILLIAMS, Assessor of the
`City of Utica,jNew3York,
`
`'
`
`Index NO..EFCA2016E2002
`RJI No; 32—16-0857
`Assigned Judge: HESTER
`
`_
`
`Respondents.
`
`To :evi9W‘a cattain real property
`assessment for the assessment :01;
`year‘ZOlG under Article'? of the
`Real Property Tax Law.
`
`WHEREAS,
`
`'APPLE
`
`PROPERTY
`
`GROUP
`
`LLC, Petitioner
`
`,above—named
`
`(WPetitionerP),
`
`commenced‘
`
`the‘
`
`above-entitled:
`
`proceeding
`
`(this
`
`"Prbceedihg") under ArtiCle 7 of-the Real-Property Tax Law to reduce-the
`
`asSeSsment Of certain of its real prdpérty ("PétitiOner's property")
`
`located in the City of Utioa, County Of Oneidaf State of:New york ahd
`
`described on-the'ZOi6.assessment rolls of the City of Utica, New Ydrk‘as
`
`follpws:
`
`PROPERTY I,D.
`
`-
`
`TOTAL Assasssb:VALUE
`
`221 School Road
`307.14+2-297 and
`
`$45i000-00
`
`WHEREAS, Vthe’ parties have .reacned ah reSOlhtion of 7the
`
`issues
`
`involved in thiszErgceedingi it.is
`
`:STiPULATBbZAND‘AGREED, by and between:therunder8ignedt being all of
`
`~the parties and their attorneyS'in this érgoeeding,
`
`that
`
`the above
`
`assessment of Petitioner's Property on the City.of Utica, New York’s 2016
`
`assessment rolls as of the taxable status date August 1, 2016 shall be
`
`4
`
`4 of 6
`4 of 6
`
`
`
`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 10:04 AM
`- FILED: ONEIDA COUNT-Y CLERK 04m 017 10:04 AM '
`NYSC
`3F DOC. NO. 10.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`'
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`I DEX NO“ 3FCA2016'—002002'
`
`
`
`
`RMCMIVMD NYSCEF:
`04/11/2017‘
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`reduced.to the following (the “Reduced Assessment”):
`
`PROPERTY I.D}
`
`TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE
`
`221 School Road
`307.14e2-29; and
`
`~
`
`$40,320,00
`
`nand it is further
`
`\STIPULATED AND AGREED as fOlldwsi
`
`A.
`
`The offiper having custody 0f the 2016 assesSment rolls cf
`
`the City of
`
`.Utica,
`
`New ‘York shail
`
`forthwith correCt:
`
`the .entzies
`
`pertaining to Petitiener‘s 1,.1PrOpezty on“ such 2.0106 assessment. {rolls 'to
`
`,reflect:the Reduced Assessment and shall note upon'the.ma;gin.of such
`
`2016 assessment rolls opposite such entries that
`
`the same have been
`
`corrected by the authorization of-thiertipulation.
`
`B;
`
`Petitioner shall be entitled to a refund of any real
`
`estate taxes paid by Petitioner based any the amount by which the
`
`assessment establiShed On.the 2016 City-of Utica, New York's:assessment
`
`rolls for Petitibneris Prdperty before its reduction as pfovided'in this
`
`Ogder exceeds'the assessment oi Petitioner’s aforesaid real propeity
`
`follow§hg such reduction as provided'inithis_0rder; provided, however,
`
`each municipality or Othe: governmehtal entity-obligated to provide a
`
`refund shall have the option, instead of making payment of such fefund
`
`directiyitOIPetitioner;_to proyide the refund 1h the form of a payment
`
`craditr until credit in fail has been-made, upon each zeal.estate-tax
`
`hereafter levied Upon ‘Petifcionefle Prepexty by ’eeeh: such municipality or
`
`other governmentalzentityg
`
`:C.
`
`Except as permitted pursuant to subdivision 2 of Real
`
`.Property Tangaw section 727,
`
`the assessment of Petitionerfs‘Property,
`
`after its.reductioh 0n the City of Utica, New YOrk’s.2016 assessment
`
`5 of 6
`5 of 6
`
`
`
`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2017 10:04 AM
`FILED:'ONEIDA' COUNTY CLERK 04.112017 10:04 AM
`
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10
`
`
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002002
`' I DEX NO- “WON-002002
`
`
`
`
`04/11/2017
`RMCMIVMD NYSCEF:
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
`
`
`
`'rolls to the Reduced AsSessment, shall) pursuant to Real Property Tax Law
`
`section 72], not-be changed for the next
`
`three suCCeeding aSSessment
`
`rolls prepared on the basis of
`
`the three taxable status dates next
`
`occurring‘on or after the City of Utica, New Yorkfs August 1, 2016
`
`taxable status date; and all tavaills hereafter issued by any taxing
`
`jfiriSdiction With respect to Petitioner's;Propertyi while the foregoing
`
`‘proviSions prohibiting Change are So applicable, shall be based on the
`
`‘Reduced ASSeSSment.
`
`D; CoSts and diSbursements shall be denied to Petitioner;.and
`
`it is‘further
`
`STIPULATED AND AGREED,
`
`that Petitioner shall have the right to
`
`obtain, without notice to-Respondents, an order in the abovehehtitled
`
`proceeding .formalizing'the foregoing provisions of thiSIStipulationg
`Dated:
`LEYC3{'\S
`:5, 2017
`
`
`' L'i Petitioner
`
`-AP
`
`
`
`
`.; ILLIAMS, Assessor-i
`
`of the City of Utica, New York
`
`.CITY OF UTICA, NEW YORK, Respondent
`
`by: 1 é “(/3
`
`
`William Borrill, Esq.,.
`Corporation CounSel
`
`6 of 6
`6 of 6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
