throbber
FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`COURT
`OF ONElDA
`
`OF THE
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`KIMBERLY
`
`A NEWTON,
`
`and
`
`TAYLOR
`
`J HOY,
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`MASON
`VENUES,
`STIRPE
`
`JAR 22,
`LLC d/b/a
`DAVID
`STIRPE
`and
`DAVID
`ANTHONY,
`a/k/a
`
`PREMlER
`a/k/a
`
`WEDDING
`DAVID
`A.
`
`Defendants.
`
`X
`
`X
`
`Index
`
`No:
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Se
`
`Pro
`of
`
`Plaintiffs,
`themselves,
`
`Wedding
`("Stirpe"),
`
`Kimberly
`submit
`this
`Venues
`and
`
`Newton
`Complaint
`and
`("PWV")
`follows:
`as
`
`state
`
`behalf
`Premier
`
`Anthony
`
`Taylor
`and
`against
`David
`Stirpe
`
`Hoy
`Defeñdañts,
`a/k/a
`
`(collectively
`Mason
`A.
`
`David
`
`"the
`Jar
`Stirpe
`
`on
`Couple"),
`LLC d/b/a
`22,
`a/k/a
`David
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff,
`3948
`
`Kimberly
`South
`Fox
`
`Newtoi-i,
`Street,
`
`is
`
`of
`a resident
`Colorado
`
`the
`
`State
`80110.
`
`of Colorado
`
`whose
`
`address
`
`is
`
`Englewood,
`
`Plaintiff,
`whose
`
`Taylor
`address
`
`is a Canadian
`Hoy,
`South
`is 3948
`
`Fox
`
`citizen
`
`and
`
`current
`
`Englewood,
`
`resident
`Colorado
`
`of
`
`State
`the
`80110.
`
`of Colorado
`
`Street,
`
`3.
`
`Defendant
`
`standing
`13476'
`
`PWV is a New York
`with
`a principal
`office
`and
`process
`address
`
`limited
`address
`at P.O.
`
`liability
`at 5367
`
`Box
`
`805,
`
`DOS ID # 5278426,
`company,
`E. Seneca
`Street,
`Vernon,
`New York
`13476.
`
`Vernon,
`
`in good
`New York
`
`4.
`
`Defendant
`address
`P.O.
`
`Box
`
`Stirpe
`989
`
`is a
`James
`
`at
`
`805,
`
`Vernon,
`
`resident
`
`of
`
`the
`
`State
`
`Syracuse,
`Street,
`New York
`13476.
`
`of New
`New York
`
`York
`
`13203,
`
`with
`
`a
`whose
`
`possible
`record
`
`resideñiial
`
`address
`
`is
`
`5.
`
`Defendants
`
`Stirpe
`
`and
`
`venues,
`
`catering
`
`amenities,
`
`PWV are
`event
`
`in the
`
`planning,
`
`business
`and
`
`of
`other
`
`and
`owñiñg
`wedding-related
`
`wedding
`operating
`services.
`
`'
`
`precess
`The
`be an error
`
`address
`because
`
`listed with
`that
`zip code
`
`of State
`the Department
`to Van Hornesvill,
`refers
`
`as 13475,
`its zip code
`shows
`in Herkimer
`New York,
`County.
`
`which
`
`appears
`
`to
`
`Filed
`
`In Oneida
`
`County
`
`Clerks
`
`Office
`
`7/11/2020
`
`1 of 15
`08:26:50
`
`PM
`
`Index
`
`# EFCA2020-001266
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`VENUE
`
`& JURISDICTION
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Venue
`Oneida
`to, Oneida
`
`is
`
`proper
`
`County,
`County.
`
`in Oneida
`all
`and
`the
`
`County
`acts,
`omissions,
`
`because
`
`Defendants'
`
`and
`
`events
`
`is
`business
`in dispute
`occurred
`
`based
`in, or
`
`of
`
`out
`relate
`
`This
`relief
`
`Court
`and
`
`has
`further
`
`jurisdiction
`and
`
`over
`consequential
`
`this matter
`relief
`
`because
`in excess
`
`Couple
`the
`of $25,000.
`
`is seeking
`
`declaratory
`
`FACTUALBACKGROUND
`
`8.
`
`The
`
`Couple
`
`graduating,
`
`first
`the
`
`met
`Couple
`
`in Syracuse,
`moved
`
`New York,
`to Colorado
`to
`
`where
`begin
`
`they
`their
`
`attended
`legal
`careers.
`
`law
`
`school.
`
`After
`
`9.
`
`Mr.
`
`Hoy
`Syracuse,
`New York
`
`grew
`up
`New York.
`area.
`
`City
`
`in Kingston,
`Ms.
`Newton
`
`Ontario,
`grew
`
`Canada,
`approximately
`in Colorado
`but
`
`up
`
`has
`
`two
`extended
`
`hours
`
`family
`
`of
`north
`in the
`
`10.After
`
`planning
`
`moving
`their
`
`to
`Colorado,
`wedding.
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`got
`
`engaged
`
`on May
`
`4,
`
`2019,
`
`and
`
`began
`
`11.Because
`expected
`in Central
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`most
`guests,
`New York.
`
`in Central
`met
`of whom
`
`reside
`
`New York
`in Canada,
`
`and
`
`within
`
`the
`
`driving
`Couple
`
`distance
`decided
`
`for
`
`several
`
`to
`
`get married
`
`Cannery,"
`
`Couple
`12.The
`Defendants
`
`found
`own
`
`or
`
`a venue
`operate
`
`online
`in the
`
`called
`area.
`
`"the
`
`one
`
`of many
`
`venues
`
`that
`
`13.Since
`drove
`
`the
`down
`
`Couple
`from
`
`was
`Canada
`
`unable
`and
`
`tour
`
`to
`visited
`
`the
`the
`
`venue
`on
`site
`
`from
`their
`
`Colorado,
`behalf.
`
`Mr.
`
`Hoy's
`
`parents
`
`Couple
`14.The
`Defendants
`
`was
`able
`telephonically.
`
`to
`
`participate
`
`virtually
`
`via
`
`FaceTime
`
`before
`
`speaking
`
`with
`
`15.Familiar
`in the
`
`with
`the
`of 2020,
`
`fall
`
`seasons
`close
`
`in Central
`Labor
`
`to
`
`Day.
`
`New York,
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`hoped
`
`for
`
`a wedding
`
`date
`
`16.Defendants
`August
`
`indicated
`2020.
`
`29,
`
`that,
`
`due
`
`to
`
`a
`
`recent
`
`cancellation,
`
`there
`
`was
`
`an
`
`opening
`
`for
`
`17.The
`
`looking
`
`Cannery
`for.
`
`had
`
`Further,
`
`the
`allure,
`Defendants'
`
`capacity,
`
`flexibility
`
`charm,
`with
`
`and
`availability
`out-of-state
`couples
`
`that
`
`the
`appealed
`
`was
`Couple
`to them.
`
`18.On
`May
`23,
`in the
`amount
`
`the
`2019,
`of $2,400.
`
`Couple
`
`paid
`
`Defendants
`
`an
`
`initial
`
`deposit
`
`toward
`
`their
`
`wedding
`
`2
`
`2 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`19.Defendants
`contract
`on-site
`
`any
`
`price,
`staff,
`
`calculated
`which
`
`the
`
`was
`
`vendors,
`
`deposit
`on
`based
`or others
`
`by
`their
`who
`
`taking
`guest
`would
`
`10% of
`Couple's
`the
`of approximately
`count
`be
`present
`throughout
`
`estimated
`
`total
`
`150,
`the
`
`excluding
`day.
`
`20.On
`May
`exchange
`2020.
`
`29,
`
`29,
`for
`See
`
`the
`2019,
`a wedding
`Exhibit
`
`executed
`Couple
`of 150
`guests
`1, 05/29/2019
`
`a contract
`at
`be
`held
`to
`Contract.
`Signed
`
`with
`the
`
`Defendants
`
`Cannery
`
`for
`$24,999.29
`on Saturday,
`
`August
`
`in
`
`21.Defendants
`Couple
`in cash.
`
`further
`the
`offered
`to take
`advantage
`
`planned
`
`Couple
`of
`
`this
`
`a 10% discount
`for
`and make
`incentive
`
`cash
`the
`
`payments,
`
`remaiñiñg
`
`the
`
`so
`payments
`
`22.Also,
`toward
`called
`
`Defendants
`a rehearsal
`Mason
`"the
`
`the
`sent
`dinner
`Jar."
`
`Couple
`if
`the
`
`a welcome
`Couple
`decided
`
`packet
`to
`
`with
`hold
`
`a credit
`on
`it at
`
`of
`
`that
`their
`
`could
`other
`
`used
`be
`venues
`
`23.The
`toward
`
`Couple
`their
`
`agreed
`rehearsal
`
`and
`
`provided
`dinner.
`
`Defendants
`
`with
`
`an
`
`additional
`
`$800
`
`to be
`
`contributed
`
`24. On November
`large
`Dibbles
`
`tasting
`Inn
`
`17,
`event
`Estates.
`
`2019,
`that
`
`Couple
`the
`Defendants
`
`booked
`hosted
`
`a trip
`their
`
`for
`
`to Syracuse,
`clients
`at one
`
`New York
`to
`of
`their
`other
`
`attend
`
`a
`
`venues,
`
`25.Since
`
`lives
`in the
`
`out-of-state,
`until
`area
`
`their
`
`the Couple
`wedding.
`
`knew
`
`this
`
`event
`
`would
`
`be the
`
`only
`
`time
`
`the
`would
`
`Couple
`be
`
`they
`
`26.Therefore,
`and
`finalized
`
`they made
`of
`many
`
`arrangements
`the
`
`wedding
`
`to meet
`all
`details
`
`other
`with
`at once.
`
`vendors,
`
`selected
`
`their
`
`menu,
`
`27. Upon
`additional
`Colorado.
`
`confirming
`$8,000
`
`the
`that
`toward
`
`10% discount
`their
`
`wedding
`
`still
`in
`
`applies,
`cash
`
`the
`before
`
`Couple
`
`catching
`
`paid
`their
`
`Defendants
`flight
`
`back
`
`an
`to
`
`28.Throughout
`
`January
`
`and
`
`February
`
`of 2020,
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`continued
`
`wedding
`
`plaññiñg.
`
`29. On March
`approve
`
`1,
`before
`
`2020,
`
`they
`
`ordered
`Couple
`the
`to order
`planned
`the
`
`a
`rest
`
`sample
`to
`send
`
`of
`
`the
`out
`
`final
`to their
`
`invitation
`guests.
`
`design
`
`to
`
`30.A
`
`few
`presumptive
`
`days
`
`later,
`positive
`
`however,
`cases
`
`Governor
`of COVID-19.
`
`Jared
`
`Polis
`
`announced
`
`Colorado's
`
`first
`
`31.Over
`reports
`
`the
`
`next
`about
`
`several
`whether
`
`weeks,
`the
`virus
`
`Couple
`the
`would
`
`grew
`interfere
`
`concerned
`with
`their
`
`based
`wedding.
`
`on many
`
`ccñílicting
`
`32. Until
`updates
`
`the
`
`Couple
`before
`
`had
`
`placing
`
`more
`the
`
`information,
`final
`order
`
`they
`their
`
`for
`
`wanted
`
`wedding
`
`see
`to
`invitations.
`
`if Defendants
`
`had
`
`any
`
`3
`
`3 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`33.Without
`any
`about
`inquire
`pandemic.
`the
`
`word
`the
`
`from
`
`status
`
`Defendants,
`and
`more
`
`the
`
`clarity
`
`Couple
`about
`
`reached
`Defendants'
`
`out
`
`on
`
`plans
`
`April
`for
`
`22,
`
`2020,
`
`responding
`
`to
`to
`
`34.Although
`bê|ieved
`
`Defendants
`were
`
`they
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`provide
`
`busy
`
`prioritizing
`
`any
`needs
`
`meaningful
`of
`couples
`
`response,
`with
`
`the
`
`the
`
`Couple
`weddings.
`
`spring
`
`initially
`
`the
`35.Still,
`invitations.
`
`Couple
`Despite
`
`ensured
`
`having
`
`to make
`this
`information,
`
`Defendants
`
`aware
`Defendants
`
`their
`of
`ignored
`
`decision
`to
`the Couple's
`
`off
`hold
`inquiries.
`
`on
`
`36.From
`answers
`
`April
`
`to
`
`specifically
`the
`availability
`situation
`the
`
`to
`
`2020
`their
`requested
`of backup
`escalates.
`
`present,
`questions
`details
`
`the
`and
`about
`and
`
`dates,
`
`any
`
`otheroptions
`
`followed
`has
`Couple
`for
`Defendants
`Defendants'
`
`nearly
`up
`address
`
`to
`
`a dozen
`their
`
`times
`concerns.
`
`re-opening
`for
`
`plans,
`
`addressing
`
`safety
`the
`
`seeking
`They
`precautions,
`issues
`before
`
`37.Even
`have
`
`though
`failed
`
`Defendants
`to make
`
`any
`
`have
`effort
`
`known
`resolve
`
`to
`
`about
`
`these
`
`anything
`
`matters
`address
`
`or
`
`since
`the
`
`least
`at
`Couple's
`
`April,
`concerns.
`
`they
`
`38.For
`
`example,
`questions,
`
`June
`
`Defendants
`still
`
`plenty
`
`was
`
`they
`of
`
`on
`instead
`wished
`150
`guests
`issues.
`be
`
`2020,
`4,
`there
`stating
`for. Without
`staff
`plus
`
`no
`
`wedding
`gathering
`there
`
`would
`
`summarily
`of
`to
`time
`how or why
`they
`Defendants
`possible,
`
`Couple's
`the
`dismissed
`with
`the
`Couple
`provide
`the
`social
`a large
`believed
`seemed
`adamant
`
`explaining
`would
`
`be
`
`39.In
`
`response
`
`Couple's
`
`to the
`Defendants
`simply
`contract[,]"
`accompanied
`
`inquiries
`sent
`
`by
`
`about
`an
`a link.
`
`possible
`automated
`
`options
`email
`
`to
`that
`
`cancel
`stated
`
`or
`postpone
`"here
`is
`
`your
`
`if
`
`necessary,
`signed
`
`Couple
`40.The
`from
`the
`representation
`it before.
`
`clicked
`original
`of
`this
`Exhibit
`
`See
`
`the
`
`link,
`
`they
`
`as
`
`on
`the
`contract
`document
`06/09/2020
`
`2,
`
`saw a document
`but
`May.
`signed
`last
`contract,"
`their
`"signed
`Document
`
`- Doctored.
`
`that was
`
`completely
`
`different
`Defendants'
`
`Notwithstanding
`the Couple
`
`had
`
`never
`
`seen
`
`Defendants'
`
`41.Upon
`
`trying
`Couple
`their
`
`reviewing
`somehow
`to
`pointed
`previous
`
`bind
`these
`
`out
`concerns
`
`additional
`Couple
`modifications
`requests.
`
`the
`
`and
`
`provisicñs,
`
`the
`terms
`to
`to Defendants,
`
`Couple
`
`they
`
`believed
`never
`agreed
`addition
`to
`
`in
`
`they
`
`were
`The
`
`to.
`
`re-raising
`
`retroactively
`out
`
`42.However,
`explanation
`
`the
`for
`
`Couple
`the
`
`grew
`altered
`
`more
`document.
`
`suspicious
`
`when
`
`Defendants
`
`never
`
`offered
`
`any
`
`43.Instead,
`email
`
`Defendant
`address
`
`where
`
`Stirpe
`he
`
`began
`
`continued
`
`communicating
`dismissing
`
`with
`their
`
`Couple
`the
`concerns
`
`as
`
`his
`via
`invalid
`
`"yahoo.com"
`
`and
`
`said
`
`he
`
`4
`
`4 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`would
`goose
`
`"not
`go[]
`chase[.]"
`
`through
`
`every
`
`available
`
`date
`
`for
`
`the
`
`foreseeable
`
`future
`
`for
`
`some
`
`wild
`
`44. Otherwise,
`restricti0ñs,
`quarantines,
`Defendants'
`on
`
`he
`
`refused
`border
`aside
`
`to address
`
`closures,
`from
`
`conduct,
`
`doctored
`the
`contract,
`cancellation/postponement
`"the
`terms
`unclear
`which
`
`of your
`contract
`
`any
`
`of
`
`the
`
`current
`
`government
`
`alternatives,
`contract
`would
`even
`are
`
`they
`
`mandatory
`apply."
`Based
`to.
`
`referring
`
`stating,
`briefly
`it
`remains
`
`45.Defendant
`himself
`
`wedding
`
`Stirpe
`"an
`
`as
`venue
`
`represents
`
`himself
`
`as
`
`entrepreneur,
`in the
`expert
`
`author,
`industry."
`
`"David
`business
`
`Anthony,
`coach,
`
`Wedding
`sales
`
`MD"
`
`trainer,
`
`and
`
`advertises
`and
`the
`
`#1
`
`46.Even
`as
`
`though
`a cancellati0ñ
`
`the
`
`Couple
`and
`
`has
`
`elected
`Defendants
`to cancel,
`yet
`additional
`payments.
`demanded
`
`even
`
`to treat
`
`these
`
`inquiries
`
`47.It
`
`been
`
`has
`Defendants
`
`weeks
`twelve
`or
`assurances
`
`since
`that
`
`the
`
`they
`
`Couple
`could
`
`initially
`perform
`
`requested
`of
`in light
`
`a status
`issues.
`these
`
`update
`
`from
`
`Defendants'
`
`as
`
`planned,
`
`they
`
`48.Despite
`occur
`instead.
`
`Defendants'
`
`initial
`have
`
`acknowledgment
`since
`backtracked
`
`that
`
`the
`and
`
`wedding
`threatened
`
`may
`to
`
`be
`not
`after
`go
`
`possible
`the
`Couple
`
`to
`
`from
`
`49. Given
`and
`
`global
`
`pandemic,
`
`apparent
`the
`
`willingness
`Couple
`has
`
`take
`to
`choice
`
`advantage
`to seek
`but
`
`no
`
`a national
`of
`guidance
`
`emergency
`Court.
`the
`
`APPLICABLE
`
`LAWS
`
`& POLICY
`
`GUIDELINES
`
`50. On March
`
`emergency
`
`2020,
`13,
`of March
`
`the
`
`1, 2020,
`
`President
`under
`
`declared
`42 U.S.C.
`
`outbreak
`COVID-19
`the
`in Executive
`§ 5121
`
`as
`
`national
`a
`31353.
`
`Order
`
`51.On
`
`202,
`
`March
`also
`
`7,
`
`2020,
`
`declaring
`
`New
`a state
`
`Governor
`York
`of emergency
`
`Andrew
`in response
`
`M. Cuomo
`issued
`to COVID-19.
`
`Executive
`
`Order
`
`52. Over
`
`the
`
`next
`
`few
`
`directed
`guideliñes
`regions
`
`individuals,
`
`pending
`15,
`
`May
`
`Governor
`
`months,
`businesses,
`New
`York's
`
`2020.
`
`Cuomo
`local
`and
`phased
`
`additional
`
`issued
`governments
`approach
`
`re-opeñiñg
`
`to
`
`executive
`adhere
`began
`that
`
`orders
`to
`
`in
`
`that
`interim
`select
`
`New
`
`53. Under
`operations
`their
`that
`which
`
`limits,
`
`York's
`subject
`
`are
`
`phased
`to
`
`employees,
`cannot
`
`customers,
`be waived
`
`re-opening
`various
`closures
`and
`visitors
`reason.
`
`for
`
`any
`
`plan,
`and
`
`all
`businesses,
`restrictions.
`
`entities,
`entities
`
`All
`
`comply
`
`with
`
`local,
`
`state,
`
`and
`must
`and
`
`other
`ensure
`federal
`
`54.All
`
`businesses,
`19 Health
`offered
`
`and
`a template
`
`including
`Safety
`that
`
`essential
`Plan.
`For
`companies
`
`businesses,
`large
`gatherings
`could
`use
`as
`
`are
`
`also
`such
`a sample.
`
`a COVID-
`to develop
`required
`the CDC has
`as weddings,
`
`5
`
`5 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`55.The
`to
`
`sample
`
`plan
`
`includes
`
`implement,
`
`including
`
`examples
`following:
`
`the
`
`of
`
`policies
`
`and
`
`procedures
`
`for
`
`these
`
`businesses
`
`"Consider
`local
`area
`
`spreading
`from
`virus
`
`limiting
`(e.g.,
`the
`areas
`
`If attendañce
`inform
`attendees
`whether
`they
`will
`participate.
`
`event
`
`attendance
`
`to staff
`
`community,
`
`city,
`
`town,
`
`and
`or
`
`attendees
`
`county)
`
`to
`
`who
`reduce
`
`live
`
`in the
`risk
`of
`
`with
`
`higher
`
`levels
`
`of COVID-19.
`
`is
`
`open
`in
`
`staff
`to
`advance
`
`and
`so
`
`from
`guests
`can make
`
`they
`
`other
`an
`
`communities.
`decision
`informed
`
`Develop
`help
`
`online
`reduce
`
`attendance
`number
`
`the
`
`options
`attendees
`
`of
`
`in addition
`at
`
`the
`
`in-perscñ
`to
`event.
`
`attendance
`
`to
`
`Develop
`
`a flexible
`
`refund
`
`policy.
`
`Designate
`related
`know
`
`a staff
`situations
`how to
`contact
`
`perscñ
`and
`this
`
`responsible
`concerns.
`person."
`
`for
`Make
`
`responding
`other
`sure
`
`to
`staff
`
`all
`
`and
`
`COVID-19
`
`attendees
`
`to Prevent
`
`the
`
`Spread
`
`of COVID-
`
`Tool
`added).
`
`Exhibit
`56.See
`19 at Events
`
`3, CDC Readiness
`and
`Gatherings,
`
`and
`Planning
`p. 2 (emphasis
`
`57.For
`
`County
`Type
`
`the
`
`Cannery,
`through
`Code:
`
`CT;
`
`at
`and
`
`Defendant
`least
`February
`Certificate
`
`PWV
`
`No.
`
`is
`
`licensed
`a
`2021:
`Serial
`28,
`898449.
`
`catering
`No.
`
`establishment
`Class
`
`2214483;
`
`in Oneida
`Code:
`
`246;
`
`58.As
`
`of
`
`July
`
`gathering
`
`2020,
`8,
`restrictions
`
`however,
`
`currently
`
`catering
`in effect
`
`services
`in each
`
`are
`region.
`
`subject
`
`to
`
`the
`
`non-essential
`
`59.
`
`In Oneida
`
`individuals,
`disiñfection
`
`County,
`and
`protocols
`
`non-essential
`
`businesses
`that
`
`the
`
`gatherings
`adhere
`must
`Department
`
`must
`all
`to
`of Health
`
`be
`social
`requires.
`
`limited
`
`to
`
`no more
`
`than
`
`distancing,
`
`cleaning,
`
`50
`and
`
`60.Moreover,
`Commissioner
`with
`states
`
`Cuomo's
`issue
`to
`transmissicñ
`
`Executive
`a travel
`rates
`
`Governor
`of Health
`significant
`the
`
`10,
`
`July
`reside)
`
`2020,
`are
`subject
`
`following
`to this
`
`states
`quarantine
`
`Order
`
`205
`
`directed
`
`advisory
`to
`quarantine
`locations
`
`requiring
`for
`
`all
`14
`
`where
`
`New
`
`the
`travelers
`upon
`days
`the
`
`Couple's
`
`York
`
`coming
`entry.
`
`State
`from
`of
`As
`guests
`
`(including
`requirement:
`
`Alabama
`
`Arkansas
`
`Arizona
`
`6
`
`6 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`California
`
`Delaware
`
`Florida
`
`Georgia
`
`lowa
`
`Idaho
`
`Kansas
`
`Louisiana
`
`Mississippi
`
`North
`
`Carolina
`
`Nevada
`
`Oklahoma
`
`South
`
`Carolina
`
`Tennessee
`
`Texas
`
`Utah
`
`61.The
`
`above
`
`list
`
`fluctuates
`
`regularly
`
`and
`
`includes
`
`newly-added
`
`states
`
`each
`
`week.
`
`62.Moreover,
`essential
`American
`
`the
`travel
`citizens'
`
`Department
`with
`Canada
`health
`and
`
`of Homeland
`and
`Mexico
`safety.
`
`Security
`across
`
`has
`all
`
`extended
`land
`ports
`
`its
`of
`
`ban
`
`entry
`
`on
`to
`
`non-
`
`all
`protect
`
`(Declaratory
`
`Judgment
`
`FIRST
`
`as
`
`to
`
`CAUSE
`Legality/Public
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Policy
`
`of Contract
`
`Performance)
`
`63.The
`
`foregoing
`
`paragraphs
`
`are
`
`incorporated
`
`hereiñ
`
`by
`
`reference.
`
`64.Under
`
`of
`
`to
`
`the
`
`C.P.L.R.
`N.Y.
`effect
`the
`to a justiciable
`
`§ 3001,
`a final
`
`"[t]he
`judgment
`
`controversy
`
`supreme
`as
`whether
`
`court
`may
`rights
`the
`further
`or not
`
`render
`other
`and
`relief
`
`a declaratory
`legal
`relations
`is or
`could
`be
`
`judgment
`of
`claimed."
`
`having
`parties
`
`65.A
`
`justiciable
`deemed
`
`void
`
`controversy
`as
`becoming
`
`exists
`illegal
`
`regarding
`or
`in violation
`
`whether
`of
`
`the
`public
`
`parties'
`
`contract
`
`policy
`
`to
`
`carry
`
`out
`
`should
`terms.
`its
`
`be
`
`parties'
`
`66.By
`
`declaring
`immediate
`uncertainties
`address
`
`the
`
`and
`
`the
`practical
`effect
`of
`the
`current
`nature
`and
`
`immediacy
`
`void,
`
`contract
`of
`influencing
`COVID-19
`
`the
`the
`
`Court's
`parties'
`
`determination
`
`conduct
`
`will
`have
`With
`accordingly.
`relief
`is appropriate
`obligations.
`rights
`and
`
`the
`the
`to
`
`pandemic,
`parties'
`the
`
`of
`
`declaratory
`respective
`
`Couple's
`67.The
`essential
`
`gathering
`therefore,
`
`wedding,
`(defined
`to
`
`subject
`
`and,
`
`non-
`
`a
`
`constitutes
`other
`social
`
`events)
`immediately
`
`are
`
`a
`
`large
`to
`
`celebration
`include
`
`the
`
`existing
`
`of
`
`their
`
`marriage,
`celebrations,
`Such
`
`restrictions
`
`or
`
`parties,
`restricticñs.
`
`7
`
`7 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`enforceable,
`are
`not waiving
`
`as
`
`the
`these
`
`of endangering
`risk
`for
`restrictions
`
`public's
`the
`reason.
`
`any
`
`health
`
`is so
`
`severe
`
`that
`
`agencies
`
`68.Since
`parties
`contractual
`
`requirements
`these
`pick
`cannot
`commitments
`
`and
`
`enforceable
`are
`which
`choose
`are
`
`currently
`
`by
`legal
`prohibited
`
`the
`law,
`obligations
`law
`
`by
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`comply
`adhere
`interest
`
`illegal.
`is
`to when
`of
`state.
`the
`
`The
`their
`
`to
`in the
`
`69.Compliance
`visitors
`public
`
`means
`to
`adhere
`from
`exposure
`
`Defendants
`that
`govemment
`directives
`to COVID-19.
`
`must
`
`ensure
`and
`
`mandatory
`
`its
`
`employees,
`guidelines
`
`customers,
`to
`protect
`
`and
`the
`
`70. Despite
`refusal
`detailed
`
`the Couple's
`to
`do
`so
`COVID-19
`
`requests
`repeated
`amounts
`to
`and
`
`Safety
`
`already
`Health
`
`for Defendants
`to address
`of
`a violation
`requirement
`the
`Plan
`re-opening.
`before
`
`these
`
`matters,
`implement
`
`to
`
`their
`
`a
`
`a
`
`if Defendants
`terms
`so
`Under
`
`71.Even
`or
`its
`sample.
`representative
`non-local
`
`to
`
`guests
`
`refund
`policy,
`confirmed
`
`(e)
`
`(d)
`its
`
`72.The
`
`did
`
`such
`
`a plan,
`the
`
`have
`contradict
`plainly
`an
`adequate
`plan,
`address
`pandemic-related
`to make
`risk-assessments
`reduced
`estimated
`social
`adherence
`
`the
`
`to
`
`they
`CDC's
`Defendants
`
`either
`
`refused
`guideline
`
`would
`
`(b)
`
`concerns,
`promptly,
`from
`count
`
`guest
`
`it with
`the Couple
`to share
`in
`included
`the
`procedures
`designated
`have
`(a)
`taken
`precautions
`to
`notify
`implemented
`flexible
`down
`and
`to 50
`
`(c)
`150
`and
`
`disinfecting
`
`a
`
`or
`less,
`standards.
`
`distancing,
`
`cleaning,
`
`a substantial
`
`portion
`land
`
`of
`the
`borders
`
`all
`
`Several
`
`be
`
`contract
`down
`for
`
`also
`from
`the
`
`contemplates
`Canada.
`foreseeable
`
`Meanwhile,
`future.
`
`York's
`identified
`
`mandatory
`in its most
`
`14-day
`recent
`
`quarantine
`travel
`advisory.
`
`driving
`crossings
`to New
`states
`
`Couple's
`prohibit
`guests
`would
`would
`
`they
`
`would
`guests
`all
`non-essential
`also
`be
`subject
`from
`be
`
`coming
`
`remaining
`because
`
`three
`
`guests,
`be
`
`traveling
`would
`
`times
`from
`either
`have
`quarantine.
`
`allotted
`the
`out-of-state.
`to
`
`illegally
`From
`
`to
`early
`non-essential
`
`vendors,
`
`and
`
`amount,
`To
`carry
`sneak
`
`most
`out
`over
`
`there,
`
`of
`the
`the
`parties
`the
`health
`the
`large.
`
`gathering
`local
`the
`
`threatening
`community
`
`at
`
`necessarily
`subjecting
`in law
`or
`
`public
`
`involves
`entire
`
`an
`
`region
`
`policy
`
`to
`
`violating
`to
`negate
`
`every
`
`nearly
`exposed
`antagonistic
`
`to
`
`being
`the
`
`73.The
`
`parties'
`
`contract
`
`anticipates
`
`the
`
`Couple,
`
`whom,
`contract
`Canadian
`would
`and
`
`have
`
`safety
`
`including
`as
`contemplated,
`border
`or
`to
`of
`
`arrive
`a prohibited,
`their
`themselves,
`
`host
`
`performance
`74.Since
`governmental
`a global
`effects
`
`pandemic,
`on
`the
`public's
`
`restriction
`
`under
`
`the
`possible
`is no
`there
`interests.
`
`150
`would
`attendees
`two
`weeks
`
`large,
`guests,
`
`contract
`and
`basis
`
`75.Such
`
`risks
`Plan
`
`Safety
`Defendants'
`
`comparison
`to the
`public
`
`further
`that
`interest
`to the
`that
`
`why
`
`explain
`requires
`in
`
`retaining
`government
`Defendants
`
`fines,
`would
`
`the
`businesses
`the
`
`CDC provides
`a model
`to
`implement
`the
`Couple
`criminal
`
`penalties,
`otherwise.
`
`$10,700
`civil
`face
`
`COVID-19
`flexible
`paid
`
`them
`
`prosecutions,
`
`Health
`and
`policies.
`pale
`liabilities
`
`refund
`would
`or
`
`in
`
`8
`
`8 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`76.In
`
`the
`
`agreement
`effect,
`transaction
`the
`makes
`this
`that
`parted
`payments
`such
`payments.
`
`they
`
`77.Based
`states
`guidance
`
`on
`the
`
`thereunder,
`
`the
`preceding
`governmental
`on
`
`public
`void
`as
`
`health
`a matter
`
`concerns,
`of
`law.
`
`is not
`only
`a nullity.
`with
`under
`
`paragraphs,
`restrictions
`
`illegal
`
`but
`
`also
`the
`
`As
`
`such,
`the
`contract,
`
`lacking
`Couple
`as
`
`in consideration.
`
`is entitled
`can
`
`nothing
`
`to
`pass
`
`Together,
`recover
`back
`in return
`for
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`presently
`render
`
`in
`
`the
`
`seeks
`
`effect,
`parties'
`
`a declaratory
`with
`along
`contract,
`
`that
`
`judgment
`public
`policy
`performance
`
`the
`and
`
`(Declaratory
`
`SECOND
`Judgment
`
`CAUSE
`OF ACTION
`as
`to Unenforceable
`
`Penalty)
`
`78.The
`
`foregoing
`
`paragraphs
`
`are
`
`incorporated
`
`herein
`
`by
`
`reference.
`
`79.Although
`the
`cancellation
`the
`damages.
`
`language
`
`policy
`
`there
`is unclear,
`is
`unenforceable
`
`is also
`as
`
`a justiciable
`
`a
`
`penalty
`
`controversy
`disproportionate
`
`or
`
`about
`
`whether
`liquidated
`
`to
`
`rely
`
`on
`
`a "cancellation
`
`policy"
`
`even
`
`though
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`80.Defendants
`has
`yet
`
`have
`cancel
`
`to
`
`continued
`their
`wedding.
`
`81.The
`
`of
`the
`heading
`"CANCELLATION
`PENALTIES
`
`WILL
`
`operative
`
`states:
`section
`-READ
`POLICY
`NOT BE CHANGED
`
`CAREFULLY
`FOR ANY REASON."
`
`AS
`
`THESE
`
`Exhibit
`82.See
`Defendant
`provision
`This
`if a couple
`loss
`
`1
`(emphases
`PWV would
`face
`contemplates
`desires
`
`in
`having
`a need
`to cancel.
`
`added).
`
`The
`book
`to
`to minimize
`
`acknowledged
`parties
`a replacement
`Defendant
`
`event
`PWV's
`
`that
`difficulties
`notice.
`on
`short
`risk
`of
`a potential
`
`83.The
`the
`of
`
`gradual
`to
`Couple
`their
`decision
`
`increase
`relinquish
`to cancel.
`
`in amounts
`various
`
`forfeited
`portions
`
`contemplates
`the
`contract
`
`of
`
`a willingness
`price
`based
`
`on
`the
`
`part
`the
`timeliness
`
`on
`
`of
`
`84.The
`
`language
`
`by
`loss
`
`stating
`of
`
`the
`revenue
`
`in subsection
`provision
`
`is
`
`and
`
`its
`
`ability
`
`3 contradicts
`"not
`a penalty
`cover
`
`to
`
`the
`but
`costs
`
`of
`other
`use
`an
`to
`attempt
`and
`overhead
`
`its
`
`"penalties"
`
`compensate
`expenses."
`
`in the
`heading
`PWV for
`
`the
`
`85.In
`
`reconciling
`enumerated
`deemed
`render
`
`the
`
`heading,
`actual
`any
`entire
`
`these
`
`provisions,
`100%
`the
`damages
`to
`cancellation
`
`policy
`
`these
`forfeiture
`be
`
`insufficiently
`ambiguous.
`
`inconsistencies
`
`clause,
`
`and
`foreseeable
`
`the
`
`between
`the
`acknowledgment
`to
`
`specify
`
`an
`
`penalty-
`
`that
`amount
`
`9
`
`9 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`the
`
`86.Under
`or expect
`or on March
`
`present
`circumstances,
`cancel
`to
`a need
`2, 2020
`
`(180
`
`their
`
`days
`
`there
`
`wedding,
`out).
`
`was
`no
`either
`
`for
`reason
`on August
`
`the
`
`30,
`
`Couple
`2019
`
`to either
`(365
`days
`
`intend
`
`out),
`
`87.Instead,
`
`ñecessary
`19 to
`be
`
`the
`
`earliest
`would
`a national
`
`possible
`until
`be
`
`not
`
`emergency,
`
`to
`
`date
`March
`within
`
`even
`
`13,
`169
`
`arguably
`when
`2020,
`of
`days
`the
`
`a cancellation
`suggest
`the
`President
`declared
`wedding.
`Couple's
`
`might
`COVID-
`
`be
`
`88.Defendants'
`
`interpretation
`
`of
`
`the
`
`meaning
`beyond
`
`possible,
`Couple's
`
`the
`
`broadly
`control,
`
`applying
`no matter
`
`cancellation
`policy
`100%
`forfeiture
`the
`how unforeseeable.
`
`gives
`
`the
`clause
`
`most
`to
`
`expansive
`cancellations
`
`89.In
`
`doing
`voluntarily
`
`so,
`
`Defendants
`
`relinquishing
`
`are
`the
`
`treating
`full
`contract
`
`such
`
`cancellation
`price.
`
`as
`
`though
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`would
`
`be
`
`90.Whether
`
`or
`clause
`the
`nature
`
`an
`an
`of
`
`early
`unenforceable
`the
`contract
`
`termination
`
`fee
`
`penalty
`the
`
`and
`
`represents
`is a question
`circumstances.
`
`an
`
`enforceable
`
`of
`
`law,
`
`giving
`
`damages
`liquidated
`ccñsideration
`due
`
`to
`
`by
`as
`
`the
`though
`
`cancellation
`
`able
`
`to
`
`policy
`book
`
`presumes
`a replacement
`
`Defendants
`that
`event.
`
`will
`
`continue
`
`loss
`91.The
`to operate
`
`anticipated
`usual
`as
`
`92.By
`
`seeking
`100%
`of
`estimated
`
`the
`
`enforce
`to
`contract
`the
`price,
`of $24,999.29.
`amount
`
`cancellation
`Defendants
`
`policy
`
`that
`believe
`
`calls
`
`they
`
`the
`
`for
`are
`
`Couple's
`entitled
`
`to
`
`forfeiture
`the
`
`initially
`
`of
`
`93.However,
`Defeñdañts
`August
`
`29,
`
`the
`
`Couple
`would
`2020.
`
`only
`able
`
`be
`
`agreed
`to
`provide
`
`to
`
`accept
`them
`
`this
`with
`
`cancellation
`the
`
`wedding
`
`policy
`they
`
`expecting
`bargained
`
`that
`on
`
`for
`
`94.Defeñdañts'
`
`to
`on
`
`hold
`their
`
`interpretation
`and
`a wedding,
`within
`promises
`
`would
`demand
`days
`
`allow
`effectively
`100% of
`the
`the wedding
`
`of
`
`them
`contract
`date.
`
`to
`
`change
`price
`as
`
`their
`
`long
`
`minds,
`as
`
`they
`
`refuse
`renege
`
`still
`
`180
`
`95.Based
`parties.
`
`on
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`an
`
`actual
`
`and
`
`justiciable
`
`controversy
`
`exists
`
`betwêên
`
`the
`
`96.Such
`or
`the
`the
`
`a forfeiture
`overhead
`event
`time
`
`clause
`expenses
`of a breach
`it was
`signed.
`
`cannot
`in
`and
`
`booking
`grossly
`
`compeñsate
`a replacement
`disproportionate
`
`Defendants
`
`event,
`to the
`
`for
`
`of
`a loss
`punish
`to
`but
`probable
`loss
`
`costs,
`revenue,
`Couple
`the
`anticipated
`
`in
`at
`
`97.Even
`whenever
`
`for
`
`a liquidated
`it
`is so
`
`damages
`clause,
`disproportionate
`
`plainly
`
`the
`
`stipulated
`injury.
`to the
`
`sum will
`
`be
`
`treated
`
`as
`
`a penalty
`
`10
`
`10 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`98.Since
`actual
`
`policy
`
`have
`Defendants
`Couple
`the
`unenforceable
`
`loss,
`is an
`
`proportion
`to
`attempted
`not
`to a declaration
`is entitled
`New York
`under
`
`penalty
`
`the
`this
`
`from
`law.
`
`forfeiture
`Court
`
`to
`provisions
`cancellation
`the
`
`that
`
`any
`
`99.Such
`parties'
`
`declaratory
`respective
`
`will
`relief
`conduct
`
`the
`have
`accordingly.
`
`immediate
`
`and
`
`practical
`
`effect
`
`of
`
`influencing
`
`the
`
`THIRD
`
`(Money
`
`CAUSE
`Had
`
`and
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Received)
`
`100.
`
`The
`
`foregoing
`
`paragraphs
`
`are
`
`incorporated
`
`herein
`
`by
`
`reference.
`
`101.
`
`Defendants
`intended
`
`they
`
`have
`
`to
`
`apply
`
`received
`toward
`
`$10,700
`least
`at
`their
`estimated
`
`in cash
`
`wedding
`
`payments
`expenses.
`
`from
`
`the Couple
`
`that
`
`102.
`
`of
`hour
`
`using
`for
`
`these
`
`to
`funds
`Instead
`additional
`a ceremony
`the
`event,
`or other
`itemized
`expense
`a shuttle
`service,
`a weapon
`as
`against
`the
`Couple
`to force
`global
`pandemic.
`
`provide
`
`the
`the
`fee,
`in the
`them
`to
`
`Couple
`of
`use
`
`contract,
`proceed
`
`the
`
`with
`150
`bridal
`Defendants
`with
`their
`
`buffet
`
`meals,
`a venue
`used
`the
`
`an
`
`fee,
`funds
`
`suite,
`
`wedding
`
`during
`
`a
`
`103.
`
`Defendants
`to
`provide
`
`having
`
`benefitted
`services
`
`from
`these
`of equivalent
`
`payments
`value
`
`by
`in return.
`
`receiving
`
`compensation
`
`without
`
`104.
`
`predatory
`capitalize
`
`on
`
`Permitting
`efforts
`to
`the
`pandemic
`
`use
`
`Defendants
`the
`existence
`and
`take
`
`these
`to keep
`of a global
`of
`advantage
`
`amounts
`health
`clients.
`
`would
`as
`
`crisis
`
`effectively
`an
`opportunity
`
`approve
`to
`
`105.
`
`Under
`Defendants
`have.
`
`principles
`to
`
`keep
`
`of
`the
`
`equity
`Couple's
`
`and
`
`good
`funds
`
`ccñscience,
`paid
`toward
`
`Court
`the
`a wedding
`
`should
`
`they
`
`can
`
`not
`no
`
`permit
`longer
`
`106.
`
`Defendants
`and
`
`risks,
`
`its
`
`have
`wicñgfully
`governmental
`
`wrongdoing
`
`on
`
`the
`
`Couple's
`
`withheld
`response
`part.
`
`the
`caused
`
`Couple's
`the
`
`money
`resulting
`
`even
`
`though
`
`circumstañces,
`
`COVID-19,
`not
`
`any
`
`107.
`
`In having
`that
`exists
`
`money
`without
`
`that
`
`rightfully
`express
`
`an
`
`debt
`
`belongs
`promise
`
`to
`
`the
`Couple,
`repay.
`
`to
`
`Defendants
`
`have
`
`created
`
`a
`
`108.
`
`As
`
`a result,
`have
`they
`
`debt
`
`law
`
`the
`owed
`
`implies
`to the
`
`such
`Couple.
`
`a promise
`
`and
`
`obligates
`
`Defendants
`
`to
`
`repay
`
`this
`
`CAUSE
`FOURTH
`Enrichment/Quantum
`
`(Unjust
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Meruit)
`
`109.
`
`The
`
`foregoing
`
`paragraphs
`
`are
`
`incorporated
`
`herein
`
`by
`
`reference.
`
`11
`
`11 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`110.
`
`111.
`
`112.
`
`Defendants'
`
`both
`
`express
`
`relaticñship
`implied
`
`and
`
`with
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`facilitated
`
`rights,
`
`duties,
`
`exchanges,
`
`a mechanism
`obligations.
`
`and
`
`for
`
`reliance
`
`on
`
`Under
`payments
`
`ability
`
`to
`
`this
`toward
`provide
`
`relaticñship,
`their
`said
`
`Defendants
`which
`
`wedding,
`services.
`
`induced
`
`they
`
`the
`planned
`
`Couple
`to
`
`to
`
`provide
`
`advance
`
`retain,
`
`notwithstanding
`
`cash
`their
`
`on
`
`they
`conflicts
`in
`
`Relying
`agreement
`issues
`Defendants
`
`or
`
`arrangements,
`
`Defendants'
`
`representations
`
`would
`would
`
`provide
`be
`incurred
`suffered
`
`cash,
`and
`
`wedding
`resolved
`travel
`costs
`
`other
`
`reasonably
`expenses,
`in the
`
`regarding
`services
`and
`and
`professicñally,
`from
`refrained
`interim.
`
`the
`the
`
`10% cash
`discount,
`implied
`inference
`that
`the
`Couple
`alternative
`
`making
`
`the
`
`any
`paid
`
`on
`
`the
`relative
`programs
`
`113.
`
`Based
`Defendants'
`
`assistance
`be
`against
`when
`recover
`
`equity
`are
`
`they
`merely
`
`unforeseeable
`access
`
`to
`for
`conscience
`equipped
`
`capacity
`
`as
`
`exclusively
`good
`and
`far
`more
`in their
`
`circumstances
`commercial
`
`businesses,
`to
`permit
`handle
`to
`individuals.
`
`beyond
`
`the
`
`liability
`similar
`and
`Defendants
`than
`loss
`
`the
`
`insurance,
`means
`retain
`to
`the
`Couple
`
`for
`
`Couple's
`control,
`governmental
`
`relief,
`these
`
`it would
`benefits
`
`seeking
`
`to
`
`114.
`
`For
`
`Couple
`
`and
`damages
`
`in
`
`addition
`in an
`
`failure
`apparent
`be
`determined
`
`of
`consideration,
`trial.
`
`at
`
`the
`
`these
`has
`
`reasons,
`suffered
`
`to
`amount
`
`the
`to
`
`(Breach
`
`of
`
`the
`
`FIFTH
`Covenant
`
`CAUSE
`OF ACTION
`of Good
`Faith
`
`and
`
`Fair
`
`Dealing)
`
`115.
`
`The
`
`foregoing
`
`paragraphs
`
`are
`
`incorporated
`
`herein
`
`by
`
`reference.
`
`116.
`
`Implicit
`course
`
`the
`
`parties'
`
`in the
`of
`performance.
`
`contract
`
`was
`
`a covenant
`
`of good
`
`faith
`
`and
`
`fair
`
`dealing
`
`in
`
`117.
`
`Among
`in action
`
`the
`
`fruits
`
`implicit
`this
`inaction
`that
`contract.
`
`the
`
`or
`of
`
`pledge
`would
`
`is an
`
`obligation
`
`effectively
`
`on Defendants
`or
`injure
`
`destroy
`
`to abstain
`the Couple's
`
`from
`right
`
`engaging
`to receive
`
`118.
`
`Where
`
`pandemic,
`
`arbitrarily
`unfortunate
`
`the
`the
`or
`
`contract
`agreement
`
`is
`
`silent
`included
`
`about
`
`an
`
`irrationally
`circumstances.
`
`in
`
`exercising
`
`who
`implicit
`discretion
`
`loss
`the
`bears
`that
`promise
`response
`
`in
`event
`the
`Defendants
`to
`these
`
`of
`will
`
`a
`
`global
`not
`act
`
`unexpected,
`
`119.
`
`By
`concerns,
`contact
`document
`among
`
`the
`
`any
`unilateral
`
`ignoring
`actively
`dismissing
`include
`Couple's
`the
`to
`be
`Defendants
`
`to
`
`others,
`
`Couple
`suggesticñs
`protections
`"signed
`breached
`
`the
`
`for months
`to
`
`covenant
`
`raised
`they
`cancel
`possibly
`for
`themselves
`contract,"
`and
`resorting
`faith
`of good
`
`as
`
`repeated
`
`questions
`
`or
`yet
`
`and
`the
`the
`
`postpone,
`
`revising
`misrepresenting
`personal
`to
`fair
`dealing.
`and
`
`attacks,
`
`12
`
`12 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`120.
`
`As
`damages
`
`a direct
`in an
`
`proximate
`and
`amount
`to
`
`be
`
`of
`
`result
`determined
`
`Defendants'
`
`at
`
`trial.
`
`breaches,
`
`the
`
`Couple
`
`has
`
`suffered
`
`SIXTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`(Fraud)
`
`121.
`
`The
`
`foregoing
`
`paragraphs
`
`are
`
`incorporated
`
`herein
`
`by
`
`reference.
`
`122.
`
`Defendants
`inflated
`protections
`contract."
`"signed
`
`misrepresented
`for
`themselves
`
`material
`facts
`in a document
`
`by
`
`presenting
`represented
`they
`
`forged,
`
`falsified,
`the
`Couple's
`
`as
`
`123.
`
`Defendants
`Defendants'
`address
`
`then
`
`dismissed
`actions
`
`or
`
`seeming
`
`ignored
`to
`give
`
`the
`the
`
`Couple's
`impression
`
`attempts
`it never
`
`confront
`to
`happened.
`
`or
`
`or
`
`124.
`
`The
`clause
`
`most
`the
`
`significant
`never
`Couple
`
`change
`agreed
`
`was
`to that
`
`Defendants'
`
`states
`
`as
`
`to
`
`force
`
`majeure
`
`(unforeseen
`
`disaster,
`
`"If
`due
`natural
`
`money
`within
`
`unilateral
`follows:
`
`addition
`
`of a force
`
`majeure
`
`any
`be
`
`your
`etc.)
`would
`paid
`calendar
`a situation.
`
`already
`same
`the
`such
`cancelled
`policy."
`
`for
`
`remedy
`event
`cancellation
`
`is
`
`by
`
`the
`
`like
`circumstances
`war,
`to a later
`be
`changed
`new date.
`to the
`Date
`by PWV.
`approved
`This
`will
`not
`be
`refunded
`would
`resort
`to
`
`disease,
`date,
`must
`is the
`and
`
`only
`if
`the
`normal
`
`our
`
`must
`wedding
`be
`transferred
`year
`unless
`Payments
`guest
`
`we
`
`125.
`
`Compare
`Defendants
`
`falsely
`Couple
`to
`use
`
`included
`would
`to justify
`
`Exhibit
`knew
`
`Cancellation
`
`revised
`
`Policy
`document
`
`with
`
`Exhibit
`1,
`included
`the
`that
`or misrepresented
`terms.
`as
`binding
`or doctored
`on
`terms
`these
`falsified
`rely
`or
`retention
`of
`overcharges
`unwarranted
`
`2,
`provisions
`provided
`They
`to solicit
`forced
`payments.
`
`Cancellation
`
`that
`the
`
`were
`intent
`performance
`
`Policy.
`either
`that
`the
`or
`
`126.
`
`The
`
`Couple
`Defendants'
`
`reasonably
`intent
`initial
`on
`the
`Defendants'
`
`about
`the
`
`clarity
`
`effects
`as
`
`to
`
`relied
`behind
`contract
`positions
`
`on
`
`these
`
`making
`they
`and
`
`misrepresentations
`such
`
`revisions,
`and making
`signed,
`expectations
`moving
`
`by
`negotiating
`exhaustive
`forward.
`
`continuing
`in good
`attempts
`
`inquire
`to
`faith
`as
`to seek
`
`to
`
`127.
`
`It was
`reasonable
`of
`legal
`or
`effects
`in the
`hopes
`
`of
`
`resolving
`
`for
`Defendants'
`
`the
`
`Couple
`revised
`the matter.
`
`pursue
`to
`document.
`
`these
`
`They
`
`efforts
`sought
`
`to
`
`ascertain
`an
`explanation
`
`any
`
`practical
`or
`
`clarity
`
`128.
`
`they
`
`reliance
`Couple's
`The
`offered
`Defendants
`
`was
`also
`explain
`to
`
`justifiable,
`their
`conduct
`
`considering
`or
`provide
`
`numerous
`the
`their
`side
`
`opportunities
`story.
`the
`
`of
`
`13
`
`13 of 15
`
`

`

`FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2020 08:26 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. EFCA2020-001266
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2020
`
`129.
`
`The
`
`the Couple
`them
`force
`
`t

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket