throbber
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONONDAGA
`COMMERCIAL DIVISION
`
`PRELIMINARY
`CONFERENCE
`STIPULATION AND
`
`ORDER
`
`Commercial Division
`Index No.: 2016—EF—2494
`
`RJI N0.: 33—17—0510
`
`PRESIDING JUSTICE: HON. ANTHONY J. PARIS
`
`1“,."
`
`i OSI RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC, st 211., at a].
`5
`
`I’1aintiffs
`
`v.
`
`1m: LLC d/b/a/ FACILITY MAINTENANCE
`
`1 '
`
`Defendant
`
`{113 1034061}
`
`

`

`(1) Appearances:
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff(s):
`
`Client's Name: 081 Restaurant Partners, LLC (“081”), and its affiliates Outback Steakhouse of
`
`Florida, LLC (“Outback”), Carrabba’s Italian Grill, LLC, (“Carrabas”) Bonefish Grill, LLC
`
`(“Bonefish”) , Bone'fish Grill of Florida, LLC (“Bonefish FL”), and OutbacldFleming’s, LLC
`Lead Counsel‘s Name: John G, Powers
`
`Firm Name and Address: Hancock Estabrook LLP, 1500 AXA Tower I, 100 Madison Street,
`
`,Syl‘agusenNY 13202
`
`'l‘elephone Number: (315) 565—4547
`
`Facsimile Number: (3L5) 565_—4647
`
`Email Address: jpowers@hancocklaw.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant(s):
`
`Client‘s Name: lPT, LLC d/b/a Facility Maintenance (“FM”)
`
`Lead Counsel's Name: Donald E. Frechette
`
`
`Firm Name and Address: Locke Lord LLP 20 Church Street, 20th Floor, Hartford, CT 06107
`
`Telephone Number: 860—525—5065
`
`Facsimile Number: 860—527—4198
`
`ljmail Address: donaldfrechetteQDlockelord.com
`
`(2)
`
`Pertinent Dates:
`
`:1. Date of Commencement: June 22, 2016
`
`b. Date of .loinder: N/A
`
`c. Rll Date: February 13, 2017
`
`Ll)(
`
`)
`
`Nature of Case:
`
`Fluvial?! 10 22 NYCRR 202,12(c)(],), provide a brief descriplion qf'thefactual and legal issues
`
`raised in [/76 pleadings.
`
`a.
`
`The legal theories and salient facts supporting plaintiffs’ claims are:
`
`{lel31034061}
`
`2
`
`

`

`Plaintiffs plead claims for breach of contract and breach ofthe implied covenant of good faith and
`fair dealing. Plaintiffs contend that among Defendant’s contractual obligations was the
`responsibility to accurately assess sales tax on work performed by Defendant’s vendors on
`Plaintiff’s behalf and to only invoice Plaintiffs for sales tax amounts actually due and owing.
`Plaintiffs contend that Defendants breached this obligation causing monetary injury to Plaintiffs in
`an amount exceeding $2 Million plus statutory interest. Plaintiffs also seek recovery of their
`attorneys’ fees under applicable contractual fee shifting provisions.
`
`Relief Demanded: Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial but not less than
`$2.1 million dollars; interest, costs and attorney’s fees
`
`’3 claims. lf issue has beenjoined, the legal theories and salient facts
`FM
`b. Defendant
`
`FM’s
`defenses, counterclaims and third—party claims are:
`supporting defendant
`
`
`
`
`Relief demanded:
`
`‘3 claims. If issue has beenjoined, the legal theories and salient facts
`‘5 defenses,
`
`
`Defendant
`c.
`supporting defendant
`counterclaims and third-party claims are
`
`
`
`
`
`Relief demanded:
`
`(4)
`
`Attorneys‘ Consultation:
`
`'l‘hc parties consulted in a good faith effort to reach agreement on the issues identified in
`Uniform Commercial Division Rule 8.* Agreement was reached as follows:
`
`
`
`AGREEMENT
`DATE OF
`‘
`ISSUE DISCUSSED
`CONSULTATION
`REACHED
`
`(Y or N)
`
`Resolution of the case
`6/15/16 to present
`N
`
`
`__ Fact discovery including methods, timing and
`scope
`
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lifxpem disclosure including designation, timing
`and scope
`
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`The USS OfADI{
`10/24/16
`(already
`
`conducted)
`Voluntary and informal exchange of information
`ongoing
`Y
`
`
`Confidentiality and privilege
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`{1131034 61}
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`ongoingThe scope, extent, order and form of production Y
`
`
`
`The anticipated cost and burden of data recovery
`and proposed initial allocation of such costs
`
`6/12/17
`
`Each side to
`bear
`their
`own costs
`
`* Concerning electronic discovery, see Item (8)d below.
`COMMENTS:
`
`(5)
`
`Impleader: Do you anticipate the need to add parties? lf so, who and when? NQ
`
`Note: Impleader must be completed no later than 15 days after the end ofthe last party
`
`deposition.
`
`(6)
`
`Early Disposition:
`
`a. This case is appropriate for early disposition by:
`
`i.
`
`the accelerated adjudication procedures of the Commercial Division of
`N/A
`the Supreme Court as set forth in Uniform Commercial Division Rule 9
`
`ADR (identify type and timing) Mediation was conducted on
`N/A
`ii.
`November 28, 2016.
`
`iii.
`
`N/A limited issue discovery in aid of an early dispositive motion or
`
`settlement (identify type and timing)
`
`
`
`iii.
`
`N/A
`
`dispositive motion that will be filed on or before
`
`iv.
`
`N/A
`
`other (identify type and timing)
`
`_
`
`
`This case is not appropriate for early disposition because: The parties already have
`b.
`pagieipatcd in AAA i'i’iediatiori,
`
`
`
`Confidentialitv Order:
`
`The court recognizes that most cases in the Commercial Division involve highly sensitive
`information. In such cases, the parties may be directed to enter into a Confidentiality Agreement
`that the court will "So Order." The parties are encouraged to use the model confidentiality
`agreement found at: http://www.iiycbar.org/pdf/report/ModelConfidentialitypdf
`
`The parties HAVE or X HAVE NOT entered into a Confidentiality Agreement.
`
`The parties X WILL or WILL NOT enter into a Confidentiality Agreement.
`
`If so, then state when: ASAJZ. Ifnot, then state why not:
`
`{113 1<)3-10e1 }
`
`4
`
`

`

`(8)
`
`Disclosure [See generally 22 NYCRR 202.70(g)]:
`
`It is hereby STIPULATED and ORDERED that disclosure shall proceed as follows
`pursuant to the CPLR and the Uniform Commercial Division Rules:
`
`21.
`
`Insurance Coverage shall be furnished on or before: N/A
`
`b. Bill of Particulars:
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Demand(s) for a bill of particulars shall be served on or before, if appropriate,
`September 1, 2017
`
`Response(s) to the demand(s) for a bill ofparticulars shall be served on or
`before: Response according to CPLR.
`
`0. Document Production:
`
`Initial demands for discovery and inspection shall be served on or before 14
`i.
`days from the date of service of Defendant’s Answer.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`Responses to the demands for discovery and inspection shall be served on or
`before: according to CPLR, or by agreement of the parties.
`
`The parties will provide a statement regarding the completeness of document
`production on or before: March 1, 2018
`
`iv.
`
`lt’documents are withheld are grounds of privilege, the parties agree to employ:
`
`a categorical privilege log
`
`
`a document by document privilege log (X) Note: Pursuant to
`Uniform Commercial Division Rule ] l—e, unless agreed to by the
`parties or otherwise authorized by the court: document production
`must be complete before the date setfor commencement of
`depositions; and no later than one month prior to the close offact
`discovery, each party must provide opposing counsel with a
`statement regarding the completeness of its documentproduction.
`
`COM M lEZN'l‘S: 1,,
`
`d. Electronic Discovery
`
`Will there be electronic discovery in the case?
`
`VYl'iS
`
`NO*
`
`X
`
`NOT SURE **
`
`{17131034061}
`
`’
`
`5
`
`

`

`*[fihere will be no ESI in [his case, then skip ahead to 8e.
`
`**If the parties are not sure whether Ihe case is reasonably likely to include ESI, then refer to
`Ihe non—exhaustive list of considerations provided in 22 NYCRR 202.12 (b) (1).
`
`i.
`
`Attorneys' Consultation
`
`The parties consulted in a good faith effort to reach agreement on the following ESI issues.
`Agreement was reached as follows:
`
`AGREEMENT
`
`DATE OF
`ISSUE DISCUSSED
`CONSULTATION
`REACHED
`
`(Y or N)
`
`Identification of potentially relevant
`types or categories ofESI and the
`
`relevant time frame
`4
`Disclosure oi" the applications and
`6/12/17
`Y
`
`manncljn which the ESI is maintained
`identification ol‘ potentially relevant
`sources of ESI and whether the ESI is
`
`6/12/17
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reasonably accessible
`rImplementation of a preservation plan
`6/12/17
`1Y
`
`for potentially relevant ESI
`Identification ofthe individual(s)
`_
`responsible for preservation ofESI
`ISSUE DISCUSSED
`DATE OF
`AGREEMENT
`
`
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`
`‘
`(Y or N)
`
`CONSULTATION
`
`REACHED
`
`The scope, extent, order and form of
`6/ 12/17
`Y
`
`“production of ESI
`Identification, redaction, labeling and
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`logging of privileged or confidential
`ESI
`
`
`Claw—back or other provisions for
`6/12/17
`Y
`
`privileged or protected ESI
`The scope or method for searching
`i and reviewing ESI
`‘ The anticipated cost and burden of
`data recovery and proposed initial
`
`allocation of such costs
`L
`
`6/12/17
`
`6/12/17
`
`Y
`
`Y
`
`ii. Directives concerning electronic discovery:
`
`(A) Preservation: [Uniform Commercial Division Rule 8(b)(i)—(v)]: Separately for each party,
`
`indicate whether a preservation plan has been created, a custodian for each computer/server has
`
`been identified, and an individual responsible the preservation ofrelevant ESI has been
`
`{ii3103406i}
`
`6
`
`

`

`designated. Do not list the names of the custodians or the designated individuals; state only the
`
`fact that it has been done or is in the process of being done.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant
`
`Defendant
`
`
`Yes
`No
`In process
`
`Yes
`No
`In process
`Yes In process No
`
`
`
`
`
`(B) Production [22 NYCRR 202.70(g)(8)(vi) and (iX)]: Indicate whether the parties have
`
`agreed on the scope and method for searching and reviewing ESI (i.e. the relevant search terms
`
`or technology—assisted review), the extent, order and form of production, and a projected
`
`production schedule. Do not list the actual terms of the review butjust the fact that it has been
`
`done or is in the process of being done.
`
`Agreement has been reached:
`
`Yes
`
`No X In process
`
`(C) Privilege Logs and Redaetions [Uniform Commercial Division Rule 8(b)(vii):). lfthe
`
`parties intend to treat ES] differently than other production (see Item (8)0. above), state how the
`
`parties will provide for the identification, redaction, and logging of privileged or otherwise
`confidential ESI:
`
`ESI shall be identified and logged by file name and directory cross reference and shall be converted
`to .pdf if redaction is required. Claw—Back Provisions [Uniform Commercial Division Rule
`8(b)(viii)]: State how the parties intend to deal with inadvertent production: The parties will agree
`to a claw back provision as part of a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement.
`
`(1)) Costs [Uniform Commercial Division Rule 8(b)(x)]: Unless agreed to by the parties
`
`or otherwise ordered by the conit, each party shall bear its own costs of production.
`
`iii.
`
`Judicial Intervention
`
`The parties anticipate the need forjudicial intervention regarding the following issues
`
`concerning the scope and methods of preserving and/or producing 1381: N/A
`
`iv.
`
`Additional Directives
`
`Set forth any additional directives or issues related to 1381: N/A
`
`e. lnterrogatories:
`
`Preliminary interrogatories shall be served on or before: 14 days from the date of
`i.
`service of Defendant’s Answer.
`
`ii.
`
`Claim/contention interrogatories shall be served on or before: October 15, 2017
`
`flote; P11787407” to Uni/arm Commercial Division Rule 1 [—62, unless agreed to by the parties or
`otherwise authorized by the court, interrogatories are limited to 25 in number, including subparts,
`and restricted to thefollowing topics: names ofwitnesses with
`
`{tours/tom}
`
`7
`
`

`

`knowledge ofinfozr‘mation material and necessary to the subject matter ofthe action, computation of
`each category of damage alleged, and the existence, custodian, location and general description of
`material and necessary document, including pertinent insurance agreements, and other physical
`evidence. At the conclusion of other discovery, and at least 30 days prior to the discovery cut—ofl date,
`interrogatories seeking the claims and contentions of the opposing party may be served unless the
`court has ordered otherwise.
`
`COMMENTS: ,
`
`
`
`ll.
`
`Depositions of Fact Witnesses
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`Depositions shall commence on or after fieptember l, 2017
`
`Choose (A) or (B) and (C):
`
`A.
`
`Deponent
`
`Date
`
`Place
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`Depositions of all parties shall be completed on or before: July 1, 2018
`
`C.
`
`Depositions ofall non—party fact witnesses shall be completed on or
`before July l, 20] 8
`
`Note: Pursuant to Uniform Commercial Division Rule 1 l—d, unless agreed to by the parties or
`otherwise authorized by the court, the number of depositions taken by plaintiffls or by defendants, or
`by third~par1y defendants, shall be limited to l0 and depositions shall be limited to 7 hours per
`deponent. See Uniform Commercial Division Rule 1 l—flor special rules regarding depositions of
`entities including identification ofindividuals and subject matter.
`
`In the event
`COMMENTS: At present, the parties believe that such limitations will be sufficient.
`additional, depositions become necessary the parties shall confer in good faith regarding such
`additional discovery, and seek court involvement only 1f necessary.
`
`0‘0'
`
`Fact Discovery shall be completed on or before: July 1, 2018
`
`h. Expert Disclosure:
`
`{inimiosi}
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`Plaintiff(s) X MAY or
`
`WILL NOT introduce expert testimony at trial
`
`Defendant FM X MAY or
`testimony at trial
`
`WILL NOT introduce expert
`
`Defendant
`
`
`_
`
`MAY orWlLL NOT introduce
`
`The parties shall complete expert disclosure on or before: October 1, 2018
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`iv.
`
`Note: Pursuant to Uniform Commercial Division Rule 13(c), if a party intends to introduce
`expert testimony at trial or in support ofa motionfor summary judgment, no later than 30 days
`prior to the completion offact discovery, the parties shall confer on a schedulefor expert
`disclosure ~- including the identification ofexperts, exchange of'reports, and depositions of
`tein/ying experts —- all ofwhich shall be completed no later than 4 months after the completion
`o/fact discover Unless agreed to by the parties or otherwise authorized by the court, expert
`disclosure must be accompanied by a written report, prepared and signed by the witness, if‘either
`(/1) the witness is retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case, or (B)
`the witness is a party’s employee whose duties regularly involve giving expert testimony. The
`report must contain: (/1) a complete statement of'all opinions the witness will express and the
`basis and the reasonsfor them; (B) the data or other information considered by the witness in
`forming the opinion(s),' (D) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support the opinion(s),'
`(1)) the witness’s qualifications, including a list ofall publications authored in the previous 10
`a list ofall other cases at which the witness testified as an expert at trial or by
`years; (E)
`during the previous/our years,“ and (F) a statement of the compensation to be paid to
`deposition
`the witness for the study and testimony in the case.
`
`Absent good cause, the court will preclude the use of expert disclosure not timely provided.
`
`COMMENTS:
`
`
`
`i.
`
`Other
`
`Disclosure:
`
`i.
`
`ii.
`
`iii.
`
`Names and addresses of all witnesses, statements and photographs shall be
`
`exchanged on or before: As requested in discovery
`
`Requests for admissions shall be served on or before: as needed
`Other (specify)
`
`COMMENTS:
`
`
`
`.1. Progress Reports:
`
`{113 ] 034001;
`
`

`

`i.
`
`ii.
`
`On March 1, 2018 the paities shall provide the court with a written report regarding the
`status of discovery specifically identifying what discovery has been completed and
`what discovery, if any, remains outstanding.
`
`/\ meeting place conference call is scheduled for March 8, 2018 at which times the
`parties shall report to the Court the status ofdiscovery. The court will provide counsel
`with call—in in formation one week prior to the conference call.
`
`(9) Motions — Generally:
`
`'l)laintil"f(s) anticipate making the following motions: Summary Judgment on liability and
`a.
`discrete issues of damages
`
`b.
`
`Defendant FM anticipates making the following motions: Summary Judgment
`
`e.
`
`Defendant
`
`anticipates making the following motions:
`
`
`filot‘c: Form of l’ap_‘rs
`
`_
`
`~
`
`—
`
`—
`
`The notice of motion or order to show cause shall include a statement
`
`ofthe precise relief sought
`All dispositive motions must include a copy of the pleadings
`Exhibit tabs are required
`
`— If a document to be annexed to an affidavit or affirmation is voluminous and only
`discrete portions are relevant to the motion, counsel shall attach only the pertinent
`excerpts and submit the full exhibit separately
`Memoranda of law shall not exceed 25 pages in length; reply memoranda of law
`shall not exceed 10 pages in length
`Sur—replies and post—argument submissions are not allowed without advance
`express permission of the Court.
`
`(10) Summarv Jud ‘ment and Other Disnositive Motions:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Unless otherwise authorized by the court, all dispositive motions shall be made no later
`
`than the 30th day after filing of the trial note of issue.
`
`P
`'ud 'ment, other than a motion for summar
`U on an motion for summar
`5
`/
`lieu ofa com alaint; there shall be a se )arat‘e, short and concise statement
`
`.
`
`'ud nnent in
`in numbered
`
`paragraphs, of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no
`genuine issue to be tried.
`
`{1131034061}
`
`10
`
`

`

`Papers opposing a motion for summaryjudgment shall include correspondingly
`numbered paragraphs responding to each numbered paragraph in the statement of the
`moving party and, if necessary, additional numbered paragraphs containing a separate
`short and concise statement of the material facts as to which that party contends there
`
`exists a genuine issue to be tried.
`
`Each numbered paragraph in the statement ofmaterial facts required ofthe moving
`party will be deemed admitted for purposes of the motion unless specifically
`controverted by a correspondingly numbered paragraph in the statement required of
`
`the opposing party.
`
`Each statement of material fact by the movant or opponent, including each statement
`controverting any statement of material fact, must be followed by citation to evidence
`submitted in support of or in opposition to the motion.
`
`(in
`
`Settlement Conference will be held on no earlier than October 1, 2018 (to be set by the Court).
`
`(12)
`
`l\' otc:
`
`’1
`J
`
`)
`
`(
`
`l
`
`Trial Note of Issue: Plaintiff shall file a note of issue/certificate ofreadiness on or
`before October 1, 2018
`
`Trial note of issue must befiled within 12 months ofthe date oflhe RRfiZingfor a
`
`Standard case or wit/71771 J 5 months off‘he RRfiZingfor a complex case.
`
`Trial:
`
`21‘
`
`Plaintifl'ts) anticipates the trial ofthis action will take 3—4 days
`
`Dcfendant(s) anticipates the trial ofthis action will take
`
`days
`
`A final pretrial conference will be held on November 12, 2018 (to be set by Court)
`
`The trial of this action will commence on November 26, 2018
`
`Note:
`
`All pre—trial filings and submissions required by Uniform Commercial Division Rules
`27, 28, 29, 3] and 32 (including motions in Iimine, indexed exhibit binder, witness list,
`
`identification of deposition testimony (with transcripts), pre—trial memorandum,
`requests to charge (with reference to PJI numbers or specific case citations) andjury verdict
`sheet) shall be filed and exchanged with opposing counsel at least 5 days before the final pre-
`trial conference.
`
`Failure to comply with any of these deadlines, rules or directives may result in the imposition of
`costs or sanctions or other action authorized by law.
`
`{Mitosioai}
`
`ll
`
`

`

`ey for Plai
`
`f1'(s)
`
`E.<þúe*
`
`Attomey for Defenclant(s)
`
`Attorney for Defendant(s)
`
`l)¡\'f'l':D:
`
`/t
`
`7
`
`SO OI{l)EttllD: I
`
`l-lon. Anthorry .1. Paris, JSC
`
`{ n3 r 03406. r }
`
`12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket